Current Level Of Asthma Control Research Articles

Severe asthma treatment patterns: A multicenter observational study in the Gulf region

BackgroundWhile crucial to the assessment and improvement of asthma control, insights on treatment practices in patients with severe diseases across Gulf nations are lacking. This observational study describes the treatment patterns of adolescents and adults with severe asthma across four countries of the Gulf region and evaluates current levels of asthma control; quality of life (QoL); exacerbation frequency; and the application of cellular, protein, and respiratory biomarkers in assessing asthma severity and inflammation. MethodsPatients (aged >12 years, body weight ≥40 kg) with clinician-diagnosed, severe asthma (guided by the 2018 Global Initiative for Asthma definition) were included in this cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study conducted in the four Gulf countries of Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Data on demographics, treatment patterns, and laboratory parameters (blood eosinophil count [BEC], levels of serum immunoglobulin E [IgE], and fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]) were extracted from the medical records of patients during a 12-month retrospective period and transcribed onto case report forms. At the Enrollment visit, patients assessed their asthma control and QoL with the self-administered Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)), respectively. ResultsAmong the 243 patients analyzed, (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age, 48.4 [13.9] years; female, 67.5%), the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) combination was the most prescribed asthma medication (n = 240; 98.8%). Most patients were classified as “uncontrolled,” (n = 173; 71.2%) and the majority (n = 206; 84.8%) experienced ≥1 exacerbation(s) in the preceding 12 months. The mean (SD) ACQ score was 2.1 (1.2), which indicated uncontrolled asthma, and the mean (SD) total AQLQ(S) score was 4.7 (1.4), suggesting “some limitation” in overall QoL. BECs during the 12-month period were elevated in most patients (>300 cells/μL [n = 183; 41.7%], 150–300 cells/μL [n = 138; 31.4%], <150 cells/μL [n = 118; 26.9%]), suggesting an eosinophilic asthma phenotype, although no standardized threshold by which to define eosinophilia has yet been confirmed. This study revealed that the biomarkers BEC, serum IgE, and FeNO concentrations were obtained inconsistently by the participating centers. ConclusionsDespite recommended ICS/LABA therapy being prescribed to most patients for their severe disease, the majority experienced uncontrolled asthma and exhibited elevated BECs. These findings indicate the need for enhanced treatment strategies to improve and sustain asthma control in the Gulf region.

Development and Validation of Personalized Prediction to Estimate Future Risk of Severe Exacerbations and Uncontrolled Asthma in Patients with Asthma, Using Clinical Parameters and Early Treatment Response

Current level of asthma control can be easily assessed by validated instruments, but it is currently difficult to assess individuals' level of future risk. Develop, and validate, a risk prediction score for level of future risk, including patient characteristics and information on early treatment response. We used data of 304 adult patients with asthma from a 12-month primary care randomized controlled trial with 3-monthly assessments. With logistic regression we modeled the association between the level of future risk and patient characteristics including early treatment response. Future risk was defined as Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score of 1.5 or more at 12 months or the experience of at least 1 exacerbation during the final 6 months. We developed a risk prediction score on the basis of regression coefficients. Performance of the risk prediction score improved, taking into account data on early treatment response (area under receiver-operating curve [AUROC]= 0.84) compared with a model containing only baseline characteristics (AUROC= 0.78). The score includes 6 easy-to-obtain predictors: sex, ACQ score and exacerbations in the previous year at baseline and at first follow-up, and smoking status and exacerbations in the previous 3 months (indicating early treatment response). External validation yielded an AUROC of 0.77. The risk prediction score classified patients into 3 risk groups: low (absolute risk, 11.7%), intermediate (47.0%), and high (72.7%). We developed and externally validated a risk prediction score, quantifying both level of current asthma control and the guideline-defined future risk. Patients' individual risk can now be estimated in an easy way, as proposed but not specified, by asthma management guidelines.

Trends of asthma control, disease management and perception in China

Objective: To evaluate the changes of asthma control, disease management and perception in recent years in China. Methods: We conducted 2 multi-center, cross-sectional surveys. Outpatient asthmatic patients from 10 cities in mainland China (2007-2008) and 30 central cities from 30 provinces in China (except Tibet)(2015-2016) were recruited respectively. Data of asthma control, disease management and perception from the 2 surveys were compared for 10 cities which took part in both of the 2 surveys. Chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. Results: The asthma control level improved from 28.7%(839/2 928) in 2007-2008 to 39.2%(533/1 361) in 2015-2016(P<0.01). The rate of emergency visits was 18.2%(248/1 362) in 2015-2016, which was lower than that in 2007-2008(33.9%, 1 032/3 044)(P<0.01). The rate of peak flow meter (PFM) usage was 17.9%(244/1 360) in 2015-2016, which was slightly lower than the PFM usage rate in 2007-2008(21.8%, 660/3 030)(P=0.004). 56.0%(763/1 362) of the patients used inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) + formoterol to control asthma when asthma symptoms deteriorated in 2015-2016, which was higher than the result of 2007-2008(31.8%, 803/2 524)(P<0.01). 71.1%(968/1 361) of the patients in 2015-2016 had a right perception on disease nature, while the result in 2007-2008 was 63.3%(1 889/2 986)(P<0.01). 61.6%(839/1 362) of the patients in 2015-2016 had a right perception on medication choice on daily-use first-line medication for chronic asthma, while the result in 2007-2008 was 51.0%(1 500/2 942)(P<0.01). Conclusion: The current level of asthma control and disease perception in China improved significantly in recent years, while the rate of PFM usage showed no significant improvement. Asthma action plan including PFM monitoring and asthma self-management should be further promoted nationwide.

Assessment of Asthma Control and Severity among Children According to Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines in Sulaimani City-Iraq

Background: Asthma is a common and potentially serious chronic disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients, their families and the community. Objective: Assessment of the level of asthma control and severity in asthmatic children in Sulaimani city according to the global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 82 patients who are known cases of asthma, aged 5 – 15 years , from 1st of March 2014 to 1st of August 2014. Results: Out of 82 patients in our study, 20.8%were classified as having intermittent asthma all of them have well controlled asthma, 42.7% of those classified as having mild persistent asthma 65.7% of them have well controlled asthma, 26.8% of those classified as having moderate persistent asthma 54.5% of them have partly controlled asthma, and 9.8%of those classified as having severe persistent asthma the majority of them 87.5% have uncontrolled asthma and none of them reached to the controlled asthma level according to GINA guidelines. Regarding the peak expiratory flow (PFT) we notice that 58.8% of asthmatic children who were classified as having intermittent severity, their PEF measurements ranged between 160- 250 l/min while those with severe persistent asthma 75% of them have readings between 50-150 l/min. Conclusion: Current levels of asthma control in the Sulaimani city fall far short of the goals specified in the GINA guidelines for asthma management. Also there is a strong correlation between PEF measurements and the level of asthma severity,

M7 Poor control of asthma in Uyo, South-Eastern Nigeria

Background The prevalence of asthma is increasing in the developing world. Asthma, management guidelines have been instituted to provide recommendations for the optimal control of asthma. This study evaluated the current level of asthma control as reported by the patients which may be a reflection of adherence to guidelines. Methods Asthma patients referred to a respiratory diseases clinic were recruited for the study. The asthma control test (ACT) was administered on the patients. Data was also obtained for medication use and disease monitoring. A total ACT score of less than 20 signified poor control. Results Seventy out of 78 patients completed the survey (89.7%). The average age of patients was 46 ± 18 years. The average ACT score was 14.4 ± 4.8 (mean ± SD). 82.9% of patients had poor control. 57.1% of patients who perceived their asthma to be well or totally controlled were objectively assessed to be poorly controlled. More than half of the patients used short acting β2 agonist (SABA) alone and only 20% used inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for maintenance therapy. Thirty eight patients made unscheduled emergency room visits in the past 12 months and 68.8% could not use their inhaler devises well. Emergency room visits (OR 9.5) and poor inhaler technique (OR 18.9) was independent predictors of poor asthma control. Conclusion The current level of asthma control among patients in Uyo is below guideline recommendations. Management of patients did not appear to follow guideline recommendations and patients tend to over-estimate their disease control.

Asthma control among patients in Uyo South-Eastern Nigeria

Background: The prevalence of asthma is increasing in the developing world. Asthma, management guidelines have been instituted to provide recommendations for the optimal control of asthma. This study evaluated the current level of asthma control as reported by the patients, which may be a reflection of adherence to guidelines. Materials and Methods: Asthma patients referred to a respiratory diseases clinic were recruited for the study. The asthma control test (ACT) was administered on the patients and data were also obtained for medication use and disease monitoring. A total ACT score of Results: Out of 78 patients, 70 completed the survey (89.7%). The average age of patients was 46 ± 18 years (mean ± standard deviation). The average ACT score was 14.4 ± 4.8 82.9% of patients had poor control. 57.1% of patients who perceived their asthma to be well or totally controlled were objectively assessed to be poorly controlled. More than half of the patients used short acting β2 agonist alone and only 20% used inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance therapy. Thirty eight patients made unscheduled emergency room visits in the past 12 months and 68.8% could not use their inhaler devises well. Emergency room visits (odds ratio [OR] 9.5) and poor inhaler technique (OR 18.9) was independent predictors of poor asthma control. Conclusion: The current level of asthma control among patients in Uyo is below guideline recommendations. Management of patients did not appear to follow guideline recommendations and patients tend to over-estimate their disease control.

Asthma Control Test (ACT): Comparison with Clinical, Functional, and Biological Markers of Asthma Control

Background. Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a simple tool for assessing the level of asthma control in clinical practice, and it has been validated in comparison with a general clinical assessment of asthma control, including forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1). Objective. To evaluate the relationship between ACT score and clinical and functional findings of asthma control and biomarkers of airway inflammation. Methods. A total of 68 asthmatic patients observed in our asthma clinic (33 regularly treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and 35 ICS-naïve) filled ACT questionnaire and underwent the following measurements: (a) FEV1 before and after salbutamol; (b) exhaled nitric oxide; (c) bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine; (d) sputum eosinophil count; and (e) daytime and nighttime symptoms, rescue salbutamol, and twice-daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) recording on a 4-week diary card. Results. ACT score significantly correlated with symptom score, rescue medication use, and PEF variability, but not with FEV1, FEV1 reversibility, and markers of airway inflammation, which could not distinguish controlled from uncontrolled patients according to ACT, regardless of ICS treatment. Conclusion. ACT score is a valid tool to simply assess the current level of asthma control in terms of symptoms, rescue medication use, and PEF variability. Pulmonary function and biomarkers of airway inflammation are not related to the clinical asthma control as assessed by ACT and may represent additional measurements potentially useful in asthma management.

Asthma insights and reality in the United Arab Emirates

BACKGROUND:The burden of asthma in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the extent to which guidelines are being followed for optimum asthma control are largely unknown. This survey assessed the current level of asthma control, the burden of the disease, and adherence to asthma guidelines by patients.METHODS:A face-to-face interview of 200 asthmatics in the UAE was conducted. In addition to the questionnaire administered by expert interviewers, each respondent self-completed an Asthma Control Test. The sample was stratified by region within the country and sampled proportionately.RESULTS:Sudden severe attacks of asthma were reported by 64% in the past year. Day time symptoms and night time symptoms were reported by 57.5% and 35.5%, respectively, in the past 4 weeks. Overall, 52.8% of the children and 17.1% of the adults missed school and work in the past year, respectively. The percentage of asthmatics that had emergency room visits within the past year was 27.5%, and 4% were hospitalized. Only 5.5% used inhaled corticosteroids in the past year and 47.5% were on short-acting beta-2 agonists. Only 17.8% ever owned a peak flow meter and only 30% ever had a lung function test. Only 17% had scheduled follow-up and 66% were followed-up by general practitioners.CONCLUSION:This survey shows that the current level of asthma control in the UAE is far from optimal. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the awareness among patients and update doctors about asthma control guidelines for attaining optimal asthma control, and thus reducing the burden of the disease.

Level Control of Asthma Patients in Chest Specialist Clinics

This survey aims to assess the current levels of asthma control as reported by patients attending chest specialist clinic by using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) questionnaire. Current levels of asthma control were assessed using the ACT questionnaire, and a brief instrument developed to assess asthma control in a clinical setting. 141 (100 females) patients aged 13 years and above were recruited from the chest clinic of Royal hospital, a tertiary hospital in the Sultanate of Oman. The ACT questionnaire was administered only from the second visit. The result showed that 61% of patients scored between "20 and 25" (well controlled), 17.7% of the patients scored between "15 and 19" (not well controlled), and the rest 21.3% scored between "5 and 14" (poorly controlled). More than 50% of the patients reported that their asthma had an impact in work, school or home Nocturnal symptoms were reported by 66% and the use of rescue medications by 70%. Patient perception of asthma control did not match their symptom severity as more than 65% considered their asthma controlled despite the fact that their symptoms limited their daily activities and disturbed their sleep. The current level of asthma control among the study patients falls far short of the goals for long-term asthma management and patients' perception of asthma control is different from their actual asthma control.

Socioeconomic, Family, and Pediatric Practice Factors That Affect Level of Asthma Control

Multiple issues play a role in the effective control of childhood asthma. To identify factors related to the level of asthma control in children receiving asthma care from community pediatricians. Data for 362 children participating in an intervention study to reduce asthma morbidity were collected by a telephone-administered questionnaire. Level of asthma control (well controlled, partially controlled, or poorly controlled) was derived from measures of recent impairment (symptoms, activity limitations, albuterol use) and the number of exacerbations in a 12-month period. Data also included demographic characteristics, asthma-related quality of life, pediatric management practices, and medication usage. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with poor asthma control and to explore the relationship between control and use of daily controller medications. Asthma was well controlled for 24% of children, partially controlled for 20%, and poorly controlled for 56%. Medicaid insurance, the presence of another family member with asthma, and maternal employment outside the home were significant univariable factors associated with poor asthma control. Medicaid insurance had an independent association with poor control. Seventy-six percent of children were reported by parents as receiving a daily controller medication. Comparison of guideline recommended controller medication with current level of asthma control indicated that a higher step level of medication would have been appropriate for 74% of these children. Significantly lower overall quality-of-life scores were observed in both parents and children with poor control. Despite substantial use of daily controller medication, children with asthma continue to experience poorly controlled asthma and reduced quality of life. Although Medicaid insurance and aspects of family structure are significant factors associated with poorly controlled asthma, attention to medication use and quality-of-life indicators may further reduce morbidity.

Asthma management pocket reference 2008*

Asthma is one of the most common chronic airways diseases worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing. Family doctors (sometimes called 'primary care physicians' or 'general practitioners') are frequently an asthma patient's first point of contact with healthcare systems. Disease management that follows evidence-based practice guidelines yields better patient results, but such guidelines are often complicated and may recommend the use of resources not available in the family practice setting. A joint expert panel of the World Organization of Family Doctors (Wonca), International Primary Care Airways Group (IPAG) and the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) offers support to family doctors worldwide by distilling the globally accepted, evidence-based recommendations from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) into this brief reference guide. This guide provides tools intended to supplement a thorough history taking and the clinician's professional judgment in order to provide the best possible care for patients with asthma. Diagnostic Questionnaires developed for children and adults specifically focus the physician's attention on key symptoms and markers of asthma. When questionnaire responses suggest a diagnosis of asthma, Diagnosis Guides then lead the clinician through a series of investigations commonly available in primary care to support the diagnosis. In patients >40 years who smoke, COPD is an important alternative diagnosis, and some key aspects of differential diagnosis are illuminated. According to GINA, the goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain control of the disease symptoms long-term. The physician must first assess the patient's current level of asthma control, then treat asthma in a stepwise manner to achieve and maintain symptom control. Both of these aspects are summarized in figures included in this guide. Finally, the guide also presents a flow chart summarizing management of asthma exacerbations in the acute care setting, and a glossary of asthma medications to assist the clinician in making medication choices for each individual patient. Finally, many patients with asthma also have concomitant allergic rhinitis, and this must be checked. The World Organization of Family Doctors has been delegated by WHO as the group that will be taking primary responsibility for education about chronic respiratory diseases among primary care physicians globally. This document will be a major resource in this educational program.

Asthma Control: Do Patients' and Physicians' Opinions Fit in with Patients' Asthma Control Status?

The aim of this study was to determine the level of asthma control and the concordance between physicians' and patients' opinions and the real patients' situation. A total of 777 subjects (55% female) with asthma were recruited. The study comprised a 4-week follow-up period, during which subjects completed a diary recording peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptoms, and use of rescue medication. At the end, both physicians and patients rated asthma control status. The level of control was evaluated using a composite measure. Agreement among subjective assessments of asthma control by patients and physicians and objective evaluation with the composite measure was assessed through kappa scores. A total of 518 (67%) patients had “not well-controlled asthma,” being the remaining “totally controlled” (8%) or “well-controlled” (25%). “Not well-controlled asthma” was more frequent in smokers (82%) than in ex-smokers (70%) or in non-smokers (62%; p = 0.0002). Kappa scores between patients' and physicians' opinions and the real patients' status were 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01–0.05) and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03–0.09), respectively. In conclusion, current level of asthma control is suboptimal for a majority (67%) of patients in Spain. Besides, asthma control is worse in smokers. Neither patients' nor physicians' opinions agree with patients' real situation. Both patients and physicians accept as normal a suboptimal status of their disease.

Poor perceptions and expectations of asthma control: Results of the International Control of Asthma Symptoms (ICAS) survey of patients and general practitioners

To assess current levels of asthma control and to identify barriers to optimal asthma management. A survey was conducted of 802 asthma patients (via computer-aided telephone interviewing) and 809 general practitioners (GPs; via the internet) from the UK, Italy, France, Germany, Spain, Canada and Australia. Over three-quarters (82%) of patients surveyed reported an absence of asthma control, with the vast majority (80%) experiencing subsequent lifestyle restrictions. Although most (58%) GPs questioned believed that total asthma control was possible, half (52%) agreed that their patients were not achieving best possible asthma control. Action is required to encourage patients to view their asthma more seriously and to be more proactive in reporting symptoms to their GP. These actions, coupled with greater prompting of patients by GPs about their asthma, should help to optimize asthma management.

Managing asthma in the real world.

Asthma treatment is suboptimal in many patients, with impacts on morbidity and mortality, healthcare resource utilisation and patients' quality of life. The reasons for this include the inherent variability of asthma and the unpredictability of exacerbations, which can range from mild to fatal. In addition, asthma can be difficult to diagnose, particularly in the very young and old. Although treatment guidelines are widely available and well publicised, surveys have identified a significant gap between treatment aims and current levels of asthma control. Patient adherence to inhaled corticosteroids is poor, and many patients rely on short-acting beta2-agonists. The reasons for this are complex but are believed to include poor perception by patients of their asthma severity, concerns about the safety and efficacy of medication and low treatment expectations. Patients appear to be unaware of the extent to which airway inflammation can be controlled and are therefore satisfied with poor asthma control, accepting a high level of symptoms. Increasing patient understanding of asthma and its treatment, allowing patients greater involvement in treatment decisions, increasing the role of asthma nurses and improved communication between physicians and patients may improve outcomes in patients with asthma.

Questionnaire-based analysis of the current level of asthma control and management in Niigata Prefecture, Japan: Changes from 1998 to 2000

It is very important to use antiinflammatory agents, including inhaled corticosteroids, in the management of asthma because bronchial inflammation is a fundamental component of bronchial asthma. Although management according to this strategy is recommended in several countries, the actual situation of asthmatic patients in Japan is poorly understood. To clarify the actual management of asthma in Japan, the present study was undertaken. In 1998, for 8 weeks from September through to October, questionnaires on asthma control and satisfaction in daily life were given to asthmatic patients. In addition, questionnaires regarding patient profiles and medication were given to the patients' physicians. The same questionnaires were repeated in 1999 and 2000. The information obtained from the same patients and their physicians who responded in each of the three years was used for analysis. We analyzed 840 cases. During this period, over 80% of patients used oral theophylline, although the percentage of patients using inhaled steroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists increased from 67.0 and 29.8% in 1998 to 75.1 and 34.2%, respectively, in 2000. Asthma control (including the presence of attacks and self-evaluation by each patient), asthma- related symptoms and sleep disturbance improved significantly. However, there was no improvement in satisfaction in daily life of asthmatic patients surveyed. Multiple-regression analysis revealed that self-evaluation of asthma control by each patient was significantly related to improvement in satisfaction in daily life. These results indicate that antiinflammatory agents, including inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists, contributed to improved asthma control, whereas oral theophylline is characteristically used in Niigata Prefecture, Japan. However, not all asthma-related problems, such as satisfaction in daily life, improved and self-evaluation of asthma control by patients may play a key role in improving their satisfaction in daily life.

Asthma control in the Asia-Pacific region: The asthma insights and reality in Asia-Pacific study

Background: Few data on asthma management are available for the Asia-Pacific region. Objective: This study examined asthma symptoms, health care use, and management in the Asia-Pacific region. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey, followed by administration of a questionnaire in a face-to-face setting in the respondents' homes in their language of choice. Urban centers in 8 areas were surveyed: China, Hong Kong, Korea, Malaysia, The Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, and Vietnam. Results: A population sample of 3207 respondents with physician-diagnosed asthma was identified by screening 108,360 households. Daytime asthma symptoms were reported by 51.4% of respondents, and 44.3% reported sleep disturbance caused by asthma in the preceding 4 weeks. At least 2 in every 5 respondents (43.6%) had been hospitalized, attended a hospital emergency department, or made unscheduled emergency visits to other health care facilities for treatment of asthma during the previous 12 months. Overall, 15.3% of respondents reported that they had required admission to the hospital for asthma treatment. Asthma severity correlated with the frequencies of hospitalizations and emergency visits for asthma in the past year. Even in those patients with severe persistent asthma, 34.3% regarded their disease as being well or completely controlled. Current use of an inhaled corticosteroid was reported by only 13.6% of respondents, and 56.3% used quick-relief bronchodilators. Absence from school and work in the past year was reported by 36.5% of children and 26.5% of adults. Conclusion: As reported for other regions, current levels of asthma control in the Asia-Pacific region fall markedly short of goals specified in international guidelines for asthma management. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:263-8.)

Association of Asthma Control with Health Care Utilization

Population-based disease management should be enhanced by good risk assessment models and instruments. We prospectively evaluated the ability of a simple measure of short-term asthma control (scored 0 to 4) to predict asthma 12-mo health care utilization (HCU). A total of 5,172 adult asthma patients completed a brief questionnaire in fall 1997 to assess current level of asthma control. We then evaluated HCU for calendar year 1998. Ninety-three percent had health plan eligibility in 1998 and were included in this analysis. Both acute and routine asthma utilization increased with increasing numbers of asthma control problems. Rates of acute care episodes were 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9, 4.3) times more likely for those with 3 to 4 control problems versus those with no control problems. Lesser, but statistically significant, increases were seen for those with two (relative risk [RR] = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.4, 2.2) or one (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1, 1.8) control problems. These patterns were similar for men and women, and diminished with increasing age. The asthma control index contributed significantly to prospective prediction models even after adjusting for administrative data such as medication use and prior HCU. These data reinforce the usefulness of measures of short-term asthma control both for the individual clinician and for those interested in population-based asthma management.

Clinical management of asthma in 1999: the Asthma Insights and Reality in Europe (AIRE) study

Asthma management guidelines provide recommendations for the optimum control of asthma. This survey assessed the current levels of asthma control as reported by patients, which partly reflect the extent to which guideline recommendations are implemented. Current asthma patients were identified by telephone by screening 73,880 households in seven European countries. Designated respondents were interviewed on healthcare utilization, symptom severity, activity limitations and asthma control. Current asthma patients were identified in 3,488 households, and 2,803 patients (80.4%) completed the survey. Forty-six per cent of patients reported daytime symptoms and 30% reported asthma-related sleep disturbances, at least once a week. In the past 12 months, 25% of patients reported an unscheduled urgent care visit, 10% reported one or more emergency room visits and 7% reported overnight hospitalization due to asthma. In the past 4 weeks, more patients had used prescription quick-relief medication (63%) than inhaled corticosteroids (23%). Patient perception of asthma control did not match their symptom severity; approximately 50% of patients reporting severe persistent symptoms also considered their asthma to be completely or well controlled. The current level of asthma control in Europe falls far short of the goals for long-term asthma management. Patients' perception of asthma control is different from their actual asthma control.