Curative Resection For Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Risk factors affecting delay of initiating adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer.

Delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported to lead to poor prognosis, but few studies have looked at associated factors. This study aimed to identify risk factors for delay in initiating AC. Data from 200 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection and AC for stage III CRC between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. AC was initiated more than 8weeks after surgery in 12.5% of patients (the delay group). Compared to those with no delay (the non-delay group), patients in the delay group had significantly higher rates of synchronous double cancers (2.3% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.001), preoperative bowel obstruction (10.3% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.003), laparotomy (56.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02), concomitant resection (2.9% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001), and postoperative complications (32.0% vs. 56.0%, p = 0.02), and a significantly longer length of hospital stay (median 12 vs. 30days, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, synchronous double cancers (odds ratio 10.2, p = 0.008), preoperative bowel obstruction (odds ratio 4.6, p = 0.01), concomitant resection (odds ratio 5.2, p = 0.03), and postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa (odds ratio 4.0, p = 0.03) were identified as independent risk factors for delay in initiating AC. Careful preoperative treatment planning for CRC patients with synchronous double cancers, preoperative bowel obstruction, and concomitant resection, and management for postoperative complication are necessary to avoid delay in initiating AC.

The association of cognitive coping style with patient preferences in a patient-led follow-up study among colorectal cancer survivors

IntroductionAmidst the rising number of cancer survivors and personnel shortages, optimisation of follow-up strategies is imperative, especially since intensive follow-up does not lead to survival benefits. Understanding patient preferences and identifying the associated patient profiles is crucial. Coping style may be a key determinant in achieving this. Our study aims to evaluate preferences, identify coping styles and their associated factors, and explore the association between coping style and patients’ preferences in colorectal cancer (CRC) follow-up.MethodsIn a prospective multicentre implementation study, patients completed the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory (TMSI) to determine their coping style. Simultaneously patients choose their follow-up preferences for the CRC trajectory regarding frequency of tumour marker determination, location of blood sampling, and manner of contact.ResultsA total of 188 patients completed the TMSI questionnaire after inclusion. A more intensive follow-up was preferred by 71.5% of patients. Of all patients, 52.0% had a coping style classified as ‘blunting’ and 34.0% as ‘monitoring’. Variables such as a younger age, female gender, higher educational level, and lower ASA scores were associated with having higher monitoring scores. However, there were no significant associations between follow-up preferences and patients’ coping styles.ConclusionThis study suggests that none of the provided options in a patient-led follow-up are unsuitable for patients who underwent curative surgery for primary CRC, based on coping style determined at baseline. Low-intensity surveillance after curative resection of CRC may, therefore, be suitable for a wide range of patients independent of coping styles.

1208 Surveillance Strategy Following Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer – What and When?

1208 Surveillance Strategy Following Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer – What and When?

Soluble CD26: From Suggested Biomarker for Cancer Diagnosis to Plausible Marker for Dynamic Monitoring of Immunotherapy.

Soluble CD26 (sCD26), a glycoprotein with dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP4) enzymatic activity, can contribute to early diagnosis of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas and has been studied, including for prognostic purposes, across various other types of cancer and disease. The latest research in this field has confirmed that most, though not all, serum/plasma sCD26 is related to inflammation. The shedding and/or secretion of sCD26 from different immune cells are being investigated, and blood DPP4 activity levels do not correlate very strongly with protein titers. Some of the main substrates of this enzyme are key chemokines involved in immune cell migration, and both soluble and cell-surface CD26 can bind adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme involved in the metabolism of immunosuppressor extracellular adenosine. Of note, there are T cells enriched in CD26 expression and, in mice tumor models, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes exhibited heightened percentages of CD26+ correlating with tumor regression. We employed sCD26 as a biomarker in the follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer for the early detection of tumor recurrence. Changes after treatment with different biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including Ig-CTLA4, were also observed in rheumatoid arthritis. Serum soluble CD26/DPP4 titer variation has recently been proposed as a potential prognostic biomarker after a phase I trial in cancer immunotherapy with a humanized anti-CD26 antibody. We propose that dynamic monitoring of sCD26/DPP4 changes, in addition to well-known inflammatory biomarkers such as CRP already in use as informative for immune checkpoint immunotherapy, may indicate resistance or response during the successive steps of the treatment. As tumor cells expressing CD26 can also produce sCD26, the possibility of sorting immune- from non-immune-system-originated sCD26 is discussed.

Osteosarcopenia: the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteopenia is predictive of prognosis and postoperative complications after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

To establish if osteosarcopenia is related to postoperative complications, prognosis, and recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) after curative surgery. The clinical data of 594 patients who underwent curative resection for CRC between January, 2013 and December, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively to examine the relationship between clinicopathological data and osteosarcopenia. The following definitions were used: sarcopenia, low skeletal muscle mass index; osteopenia, low bone mineral density on computed tomography at the level of the 11th thoracic vertebra; and osteosarcopenia, sarcopenia with osteopenia. Osteosarcopenia was identified in 98 patients (16.5%) and found to be a significant risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.53; p = 0.011). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the patients with osteosarcopenia were significantly lower than those of the patients without osteosarcopenia (OS: 72.5% and 93.9%, respectively, p < 0.0001; RFS: 70.8% and 92.4%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified osteosarcopenia as an independent prognostic factor associated with OS (hazard ratio 3.31; p < 0.0001) and RFS (hazard ratio 3.67; p < 0.0001). Osteosarcopenia may serve as a predictor of postoperative complications and prognosis after curative surgery for CRC.

Venous thromboembolism among Asian populations with localized colorectal cancer undergoing curative resection: is pharmacological thromboprophylaxis required? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

We compared the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among Asian populations with localized colorectal cancer undergoing curative resection with and without the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PTP). A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify relevant studies published from January 1, 1980 to February 28, 2022. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent primary tumor resection for localized nonmetastatic colorectal cancer; an Asian population or studies conducted in an Asian country; randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, or cohort studies; and the incidence of symptomatic VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and/or pulmonary embolism as the primary study outcomes. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. This study was registered in PROSPERO on October 11, 2020 (No. CRD42020206793). Seven studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 5 observational cohort studies) were included, encompassing 5,302 patients. The overall incidence of VTE was 1.4%. The use of PTP did not significantly reduce overall VTE incidence: 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-3.1%) versus 1.9% (95% CI, 0.3%-4.4%; P = 0.55). Similarly, PTP was not associated with significantly lower rates of symptomatic VTE, proximal deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism. The benefit of PTP in reducing VTE incidence among Asian patients undergoing curative resection for localized colorectal cancer has not been clearly established. The decision to administer PTP should be evaluated on a case-bycase basis and with consideration of associated bleeding risks.

Real-World Evidence of FOLFIRI Combined with Anti-Angiogenesis Inhibitors or Anti-EGFR Antibodies for Patients with Early Recurrence Colorectal Cancer After Adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX Therapy: A Japanese Claims Database Study.

Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant regimens (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin [FOLFOX/CAPOX]) are used after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, real-world evidence regarding treatment sequences and outcomes in patients with early recurrence CRC after adjuvant chemotherapy is limited. We aimed to describe the patient characteristics, treatment sequence, and overall duration of second-line (2L) therapy in patients with early recurrence CRC who received adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX/CAPOX) followed by folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) + anti-angiogenesis drugs (AA) or FOLFIRI + anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. This retrospective study analyzed Japanese administrative data from November 2014 to March 2023 of adult patients who underwent CRC resection surgery, started FOLFOX/CAPOX ≤3 months (mo) after surgery, and had early CRC recurrence. Early recurrence was defined as initiation of FOLFIRI+AA or FOLFIRI+anti-EGFR antibodies as 2L therapy, ≤12 mo of discontinuing adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence, median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD), i.e., duration between the start and end dates of 2L therapy (Kaplan-Meier method), and factors associated with 2L time to treatment discontinuation constituted the study outcomes (Cox regression model). Subgroup analyses were performed for timing of early CRC recurrence (≤6 mo and 6-12 mo) and tumor sidedness. Among the 832 selected patients (median age [minimum-maximum] 67 (24-86) years, 56.4% male), CAPOX (71.3%) was more commonly used than FOLFOX (28.7%) as adjuvant therapy. FOLFIRI+AA (72.5%) was used more commonly than FOLFIRI+anti-EGFR antibodies (27.5%) in 2L. AA and anti-EGFR antibodies groups had similar mTTD: 6.2 mo (95% confidence interval 5.8, 6.9) and 6.1 mo (95% confidence interval 5.2, 7.4). Age ≥70 years showed significant association with shorter 2L treatment duration (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0, 1.4; p = 0.03). The AA cohort's mTTD was numerically shorter in the ≤6 mo recurrence subgroup compared with the 6-12 mo recurrence subgroup (6.1 mo vs 8.1 mo); the anti-EGFR antibodies cohort had similar mTTD (5.8 mo vs 6.2 mo). The AA and anti-EGFR antibodies cohorts also had similar mTTD in the left-sided CRC subgroup (6.5 mo vs 6.2 mo), but not in the right-sided subgroup (5.6 mo vs 3.9 mo). This is the first administrative data-based real-world evidence on treatment sequence and outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC treated with FOLFIRI+AAs or FOLFIRI+ anti-EGFR antibodies after adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy in Japan. Both regimens had similar TTD, but relapse timing and tumor sidedness may influence their efficacy.

Correlation between spleen density and prognostic outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer after curative resection

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between spleen density and the prognostic outcomes of patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsThe clinical data of patients who were diagnosed with CRC and underwent radical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Spleen density was determined using computed tomography. Analysis of spleen density in relation to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) utilizing the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to screen for independent prognostic factors, and a nomogram was constructed to predict OS and DFS. Moreover, internally validated using a bootstrap resamplling method.ResultsTwo hundred twelve patients were included, of whom 23 (10.85%) were defined as having a diffuse reduction of spleen density (DROSD) based on diagnostic cutoff values (spleen density≦37.00HU). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that patients with DROSD had worse OS and DFS than those non-DROSD (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that DROSD, carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) > 37 U/mL, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage III-IV, laparoscopy-assisted operation and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score were independent risk factors for 3-year DFS. DROSD, CA199 > 37 U/mL, TNM stage III-IV, hypoalbuminemia, laparoscopy-assisted operation and ASA score were chosen as predictors of for 3-year OS. Nomograms showed satisfactory accuracy in predicting OS and DFS using calibration curves, decision curve analysis and bootstrap resamplling method.ConclusionPatients with DROSD who underwent curative resection have worse 3-year DFS and OS. The nomogram demonstrated good performance, particularly in predicting 3-year DFS with a net clinical benefit superior to well-established risk calculator.

Abstract 5072: Multi-omic, multi-scale characterisation of colorectal cancer defines spatiotemporal patterns of recurrence

Abstract Aim: Patients who undergo intended curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) have a 20-25% chance of metachronous recurrence, the site and timing of which are unpredictable and resistant to current treatment. The biological basis for such heterogeneous disease behavior remains to be elucidated. Bulk transcriptomic profiling and subsequently single-cell RNAseq have provided insight in the epithelial subtypes and immune microenvironment. Recently spatially resolved transcriptomic assessment allow molecular profiling of tissue while preserving tissue architecture. Utilizing ST technology we sought to perform deep characterization of a large cohort of patients with primary CRC with the intention to decipher the biological determinants of spatio-temporal patterns of recurrence. Methods: 750 patients who underwent resection of CRC with mature follow up were studied. Bulk transcriptomic, genomic and multiplex immune characterization was performed using a TMA format. Of these, 28 patients were assessed using single cell spatial transcriptomics (Nanostring CosMx Spatial Molecular Imager (SMI, 1000plex gene panel)), 120 tumors underwent regional whole transcriptome profiling of epithelium and TME (Nanostring GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler using FFPE tissue). We used image analysis and bioinformatics to integrate these complex datasets in over 120000 single-cells in the context of their spatial tissue architecture and clinicopatholgical outcome and recurrence data. Results: Using the CosMx SMI we characterized cells with complete topographic detail and defined 2 unique epithelial cell states defined. Each epithelial state had distinct spatial properties including cell size and morphology, average distance to nearest lymphocyte, neighboring cell types and stromal neighborhood. This epithelial signature was integrated in GeoMx samples and were found to predict recurrence (p&amp;lt;0.05). The Epithelial, Fibroblast and Immune GeoMx transcriptomic compartments were expanded and grouped using unsupervised clustering. Each compartment demonstrated groups of patients where specific spatially derived signatures could predict site and time of recurrence (p&amp;lt;0.05). Conclusions: By maintaining the tissue structure, we have directly measured cellular interactions and captured cells commonly missed during dissociative studies whilst defining novel molecular subtypes of CRC with clinical relevance. Novel platforms such as CosMx allow deeper characterization of unique cell types and cellular interactions that may pave the way for novel therapeutics and precision medicine for patients with CRC. Citation Format: Colin Stuart Wood, Joao Da Silva Filho, Andrew Cameron, Assya Legrini, Holly Leslie, Tengyu Zhang, Yoana Doncheva, Claire Kennedy-Dietrich, Matthias Marti, Joanne Edwards, Paul Horgan, Campbell Roxburgh, Colin Steele, Nigel Jamieson. Multi-omic, multi-scale characterisation of colorectal cancer defines spatiotemporal patterns of recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5072.

O156: Post-operative surveillance following curative resection of colorectal cancer in an elderly population

Abstract Introduction There are over 42,000 new cases of colorectal cancer in the UK each year with the highest incidence rates in those aged 85-89. Post-colorectal cancer surveillance aims to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, but its necessity and effectiveness remain debated especially in an elderly population. This study explores the relevance of computer tomography (CT) and colonoscopy surveillance in patients aged 75 and over who have undergone curative resection for colorectal cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on patients aged 75 and over who had undergone surgical resection of colorectal cancer between November 2014 and August 2021. Data on demographics, treatment, survival, and surveillance were gathered from electronic patient records. The primary outcome was adherence to follow-up colonoscopy and CT-scan surveillance following surgery. Results A total of 417 patients underwent colorectal cancer surgery, with 334 included for analysis. Twelve-month CT surveillance showed normal results in 91.8% of cases, while 24-month CT surveillance demonstrated normal findings in 88.7%. Only 52.4% had colonoscopy follow-up, with 53.7% showing normal results, 42.3% demonstrated benign polyps, and 1.1% had histologically proven cancer. Reasons for not undergoing colonoscopy included patient preference (19.1%) and frailty (28.7%). Conclusion This study reinforces the notion that colonoscopy surveillance in patients over 75 may have limited benefits. In an aging population, benefits of surveillance in terms of early detection of recurrence must be balanced against the risks of harm from the procedure, availability of further management, cost-effectiveness, and patients’ preference.

Cumulative Incidence, Risk Factors, and Overall Survival of Disease Recurrence after Curative Resection of Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study.

Population-based data on recurrent colorectal cancer are rare, but crucial for counseling patients and their physicians. This large nationwide, population-based study provides an up-to-date overview of the epidemiology of recurrent disease in patients with stage II and III primary colon and rectal cancer treated with surgical resection.

Cost-effectiveness of surveillance intervals after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Major guidelines consistently recommend 5years of postoperative surveillance for patients with colorectal cancer. However, they differ in their recommendations for examination intervals and whether they should vary according to disease stage. Furthermore, there are no reports on the cost-effectiveness of the different surveillance schedules. The objective of this study is to identify the most cost-effective surveillance intervals after curative resection of colorectal cancer. A total of 3701 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer at the National Cancer Center Hospital were included. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the five surveillance strategies with reference to the guidelines. Expected medical costs and quality-adjusted life years after colorectal cancer resection were calculated using a state-transition model by Monte Carlo simulation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years gained was calculated for each strategy, with a maximum acceptable value of 43 500-52 200 USD (5-6 million JPY). Stages I, II and III included 1316, 1082 and 1303 patients, respectively, with 45, 140 and 338 relapsed cases. For patients with stage I disease, strategy 4 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $26 555/quality-adjusted life year) was considered to be the most cost-effective, while strategies 3 ($83 071/quality-adjusted life year) and 2 ($289 642/quality-adjusted life year) exceeded the threshold value. In stages II and III, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for strategy 3 was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $18 358-22 230/quality-adjusted life year. In stage I, the cost-effectiveness of intensive surveillance is very poor and strategy 4 is the most cost-effective. Strategy 3 is the most cost-effective in stages II and III.

Peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with curative resection for stage II and III colorectal cancer: A multi-institutional prospective study.

11 Background: Although various prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer has been reported, the usefulness of intraoperative lavage cytology in patients with colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of intraoperative lavage cytology in patients with curative resection for pSage II-III colorectal cancer in a prospective multicenter study. Methods: The 20 member hospitals of the Japanese Society for the Cancer of the Colon and Rectum prospectively registered the patients diagnosed as stage II or III colorectal cancer preoperatively between 2013 and 2017. Among these patients, pStage II-III patients went through analysis. Lavage cytology was performed twice during surgery. The first procedure was performed right after laparotomy, and the second was performed right after specimen retrieval. The primary endpoint of this study was an effect of lavage cytology on 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with pStage II-III colorectal cancer. The secondary endpoint was an effect of lavage cytology on 5-year overall survival (OS) and peritoneal recurrence in patients with pStage II-III colorectal cancer. Results: A total of 1378 patients were eligible and went through analysis. The number of patients with pStage II and III colorectal cancer were 670 and 708, respectively. Among 1378 patients, 54 (3.9%) had positive cytology. The median follow-up period of the entire cohort was 5.3 years. In pStage II patients, the 5-year RFS rate with positive and negative cytology was 61.1% and 81.6%, respectively (P = 0.023). The 5-year OS rate of pStage II patients with positive and negative cytology was 67.1% and 91.7%, respectively (P = 0.0083). However, there was no difference in RFS and OS between patients with positive and negative cytology in pStage III patients. Thirty-three patients had peritoneal recurrence. The peritoneal recurrence rate was 11.8% and 1.5% in pStage II patients with positive and negative lavage cytology, respectively (P = 0.032). That was 10.5% and 2.5% in pStage III patients with positive and negative lavage cytology, respectively (P = 0.022). In total, 11.1% of patients with positive lavage cytology had peritoneal recurrence in this cohort. Conclusions: The pStage II colorectal cancer patients with negative cytology had better RFS and OS compared to those with positive cytology. Peritoneal lavage cytology was useful in predicting peritoneal recurrence after curative resection for pStage II-III colorectal cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000026070 .

Real-world evidence of FOLFIRI combined with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors or anti-EGFR antibodies for patients with early recurrence colorectal cancer after adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy in Japan: A retrospective observational study using administrative database.

110 Background: Oxaliplatin-containing regimens (FOLFOX or CAPOX) are the most common adjuvant treatments after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, real-world evidence (RWE) of treatment sequence/outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC after receiving adjuvant chemotherapy are limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was based on an administrative database in Japan. The primary objective was to describe the treatment sequence for patients with early recurrence CRC and treated by combination of FOLFIRI and anti-angiogenesis inhibitors (AAIs) or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) after adjuvant FOLFOX or CAPOX therapy. The study included patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection, started adjuvant chemotherapy ≤3 months (mo) after the first surgery, had early recurrence of CRC (defined as initiation of FOLFIRI + AAIs/anti-EGFR mAbs second line [2L] regimen) within 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy ended. Patient characteristics at baseline of 2L (60 days prior to 2L initiation) and treatment sequence were summarized descriptively; time to discontinuation (TTD) for adjuvant and 2L therapy were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors associated with TTD of 2L regimen. Results: The cohort included 832 patients: median (range) age was 67 (24-86) years, 56.4% males, 65.5% with left-sided CRC. Most patients received CAPOX (71.3%) as adjuvant therapy. Median (95% CI) duration of adjuvant therapy was 5.4 mo (5.3-5.5). As 2L therapy, 72.5% and 27.5% of patients received FOLFIRI + AAIs (AAIs group) and FOLFIRI + anti-EGFR mAbs (anti-EGFR group), respectively. Median TTD (95% CI) of the AAIs and anti-EGFR groups in 2L were 6.2 mo (5.8-6.9) and 6.1 mo (5.2-7.4), respectively. Among patients with recurrence within 6 mo (72.6%), the median TTD (95% CI) for AAIs and anti-EGFR groups were 6.1 mo (5.5- 6.5) and 5.8 mo (5.1-7.8), respectively. Among patients with recurrence during 6 to 12 mo (27.4%), the median TTD (95% CI) of AAIs and anti-EGFR groups were 8.1 mo (6.1-9.2) and 6.2 mo (4.6-8.0), respectively. Age ≥70 years was negatively associated with TTD of 2L, HR = 1.19 (95% CI: 1.02-1.39); p=0.03. Conclusions: This is the first RWE based on administrative data on treatment sequence/ outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC treated by FOLFIRI + AAIs/anti-EGFR mAbs after adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy in Japan. The treatment outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC were similar to previous clinical trials in 2L advanced CRC. The results suggested that these two 2L regimens had similar TTD; however, the timing of relapse may influence the efficacy of AAIs and anti-EGFR mAbs.

Optimal withdrawal time in initial surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery: comparison between anterior/low anterior resection and right hemicolectomy.

This study aimed to investigate the optimal withdrawal time (WT) for initial surveillance colonoscopy after curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) by comparing anterior/low anterior resection (AR/LAR) and right hemicolectomy (RHC) groups. This retrospective study analyzed 1,212 patients who underwent initial surveillance colonoscopy after CRC resection between 2015 and 2022. The patients were divided into the AR/LAR (n = 846) and RHC (n = 366) groups. The optimal WT was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and validated using logistic regression models. The adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates (ADR/ANDR) were evaluated based on the optimal WT. The optimal WT was 7 and 6 minutes in the AR/LAR and RHC groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, WT ≥7 and ≥6 minutes in the AR/LAR (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-3.24; P < 0.001) and RHC (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.59-4.39; P = 0.001) groups, respectively, were significant factors for adenoma detection. In the AR/LAR group, ADR was 41.5% for WT ≥7 minutes compared to 21.9% for WT <7 minutes (P < 0.001). In the RHC group, ADR for WT ≥6 minutes was 33.9% compared to 15.8% for WT <6 minutes (P < 0.001). The ANDR also significantly improved with longer WTs in both groups. This study suggests that a minimum WT of 7 and 6 minutes for AR/LAR and RHC patients, respectively, during the initial surveillance colonoscopy after CRC resection is optimal for maintaining a satisfactory ADR and ANDR. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring colonoscopic procedures according to the type of surgical resection.

A comparative analysis of different reduced-port laparoscopic surgical procedures after non-curative endoscopic resection for early colorectal cancer.

Surgery serves as a salvage procedure for non-curative resection of early-stage colorectal cancer under endoscopy. A standard method for performing additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early colorectal cancer has yet to be established. To enhance the understanding of different surgical outcomes by discussing additional treatment strategies following non-complete curative endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer. This retrospective study included 88 patients who were divided into three groups based on the surgical approach: conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS+1), and three-port laparoscopic surgery combined with natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (three-port NOSES). The study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes, safety, and postoperative recovery among these groups. The SILS+1 and three-port NOSES groups demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to the CLS group in terms of blood loss, complications, number of lymph node dissections, and length of bowel resection. However, the SILS+1 and three-port NOSES groups had advantages in terms of incision length (7.11 ±0.38, 4.24 ±0.33, 3.16 ±0.22, p < 0.001), postoperative pain (4.000 [3.0,5.0], 3.500 [3.0,4.0], 3.000 [3.0,4.0]; p = 0.003), cosmetic result (4.000 [3.8,5.0], 7.000 [7.0,8.0], 7.000 [7.0,8.0]; p < 0.001), and hospital stay (8.000 [7.0,9.0], 7.000 [6.3,8.0.], 7.000 [6.3,8.0]; p = 0.035). Different strategies of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery have been demonstrated to be effective and safe in additional surgery after non-curative ESD. These techniques have shown reduced pain and increased satisfaction among patients. Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery is expected to become the preferred treatment option for these patients.

Association between social background and implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancers, sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended following colorectal cancer resection based on risk of recurrence. In older patients, treatment decisions should consider recurrence rates and tolerability, as well as functional prognosis, residual disease, and social factors. This study aims to investigate factors, including social background, influencing implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. This multi-institutional prospective cohort study included 15 institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical study group for Clinical Oncology. We analyzed 159 older patients aged ≥ 80years, who underwent curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer between December 2013 and June 2018, as sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study. In total, 62 (39.0%) patients underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Four factors were significantly associated with its implementation: performance status < 2, Charlson Comorbidity Index < 2, prognostic nutritional index ≥ 40, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters. No significant difference was found in the backgrounds between complete and incomplete postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy patients. Performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, nutritional status, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters are possible factors influencing the implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients. To select appropriate treatment options, including postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, it is essential to consider physical condition and comorbidities of older patients, thoroughly explain the situation to their families, and establish a support system to enhance understanding of the available treatment options.

Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies.

This study aimed to assess recurrence patterns and related risk factors following curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center, including 2622 patients with stage I-III CRC who underwent curative resection between 2008 and 2018. Hazard rates of recurrence were calculated using a hazard function. The primary outcome was the peak recurrence time after curative resection and secondary outcomes were prognostic factors associated with recurrence. Over a median follow-up period of 53 months, the overall, locoregional and systemic recurrence rates were 8.9%, 0.7%, and 8.5%, respectively. Recurrence rates were significantly higher for rectal cancer (14.9% overall, 4.4% locoregionally, and 12.3% systemically) than for colon cancer (all p < 0.001). The peak recurrence time was 11 months, with variations in hazard rates and curves depending on the tumor location, stage, and risk factors. Patients with AL or CRM involvement exhibited a distinct pattern, with a high hazard rate in the early postoperative period. Understanding these recurrence patterns and risk factors is crucial for establishing effective postoperative surveillance strategies. Our findings suggested that short-interval surveillance should be considered during the first 2 years post-surgery, particularly for high-risk patients who should receive early attention.

A prospective, single-centre, randomized, double-blind controlled study protocol to study whether long-term oral metronidazole can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer

IntroductionFifteen to 25% of patients with colorectal cancer have combined liver metastases at the time of diagnosis, whereas an additional 15 to 25% will develop liver metastases after curative resection of primary colorectal cancer, with the vast majority (80–90%) of liver metastases unresponsive to curative resection at first. Colorectal cancer liver metastasis is also the leading cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated that intestinal flora, especially Fusobacterium nucleatum, plays a crucial role in the development of colorectal cancer liver metastasis, so we hypothesized that long-term metronidazole use could effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients.Methods/designThis study is a prospective, single-centre, randomized, double-blind controlled study in which 300 patients will be randomly assigned to the test group or the control group in a 1:1 allocation ratio. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that long-term oral antibiotics can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative liver metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee at the Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials (ChiECRCT20210229). The results of this study will be disseminated at several research conferences and as published articles in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100046201. Registered on July 05, 2021.

Impact of the preoperative SARC-F score on clinical outcomes following curative resection for colorectal cancer

Impact of the preoperative SARC-F score on clinical outcomes following curative resection for colorectal cancer