BackgroundCentralized surgery care improves results of curative resection in rare malignancies. Less is known of secondary effects of such centralization on all patients, including patients receiving palliative or no tumor treatment. This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate effects of centralization on survival and treatment decision in all gastric cancer patients in Sweden between 2006-2016. MethodsAll patients diagnosed with gastric cancer, including cardia cancer Siewert III, were identified using National Registry for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV) in Sweden. Patients diagnosed at a local hospital performing low-volume curative gastric cancer surgery before centralization were compared to patients in the same communities after curative cases were referred elsewhere. Survival differences were investigated with multivariate cox-regression models and probability of curative care with multivariate logistical regression. Results4547 patients diagnosed at 49 hospitals were included, whereof 28 stopped performing curative gastric cancer surgery during the study period. After centralization, 8 hospitals performed curative gastric cancer surgery, and the median overall survival increased from 7.9 to 9.1 months. Resection rates fell from 36% to 30%. Treatment recommendations made at multidisciplinary cancer conference increased from 23% to 80%, where any active tumor treatment (curative and palliative) recommendation increased from 68% to 73%. No significant difference in treatment strategy or time to surgery was found between the groups. No difference in overall survival was found between the groups. ConclusionDuring the centralization of gastric cancer surgery, survival, multidisciplinary treatment decisions and active treatment increased, with no detrimental effects on populations outside the major centers’ primary uptake areas.
Read full abstract