Cumulative Morphine Consumption Research Articles

Study on the Analgesic Efficacy of Femoral Nerve Block for Post-Hip Arthroscopy Pain.

Postoperative pain management is challenging for hip arthroscopy, and the effectiveness and specific protocols of femoral nerve block (FNB) in hip surgeries remain insufficient. Therefore, we designed this study to investigate the analgesic efficacy and optimal drug concentrations of FNB after hip arthroscopy. A total of 148 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included and randomly divided into three groups: 0.3% ropivacaine FNB group, 0.4% ropivacaine FNB group, and 0.4% ropivacaine intra-articular injection (IAI) group (positive control). The main outcomes included dynamic and static visual analog scale (VAS) scores at various time points postoperatively, total intraoperative remifentanil consumption, and cumulative consumption of morphine within 24h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included total intraoperative dexmedetomidine consumption, RASMAY sedation scores, and patients' satisfaction scores postoperatively. Both FNB and IAI anesthesia were shown to be safe for post-hip arthroscopy analgesia. Compared with IAI anesthesia, FNB showed no significant differences in analgesic effect within 12h postoperatively but had a better analgesic effect after 24h and lower remifentanil consumption intraoperatively. Group 0.4% ropivacaine showed lower dynamic VAS scores within the first 12h compared with 0.3% ropivacaine for FNB, however, there were no significant differences in patient satisfaction and sedation, and postoperative ambulation was delayed, indicating that the higher concentration of ropivacaine correlated with a longer time to ambulation. The IAI group had greater intraoperative opioid consumption and more side effects. Compared with IAI anesthesia, FNB can better alleviate post-hip arthroscopy pain and reduce opioid consumption. However, it requires specialized equipment and technical support and carries a certain risk of puncture. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2400091579).

The Effects of Intra-Operative Lidocaine Infusion on Post Operative Pain and Morphine Consumption Following Major Gynaecological Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia

<i>Introduction</i>: Major gynaecological surgeries are associated with considerable postoperative pain, which remains a challenge for many practitioners. Multimodal forms of analgesia significantly reduce the requirement of opioids for pain management. Despite its local anaesthetic effects, lidocaine infusion improves postoperative pain and morphine consumption following gynaecological surgeries. <i>Materials and methods</i>: Sixty patients were assigned randomly into 2 groups (A and B) with 30 patients per group. Group A received intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg at induction via a bolus injection and 1.5 mg/kg/hr in normal saline infusion from onset of surgery to the end of surgery, while the control group (Group B) received equal volume of normal saline at the same timelines. Pain scores were assessed postoperatively using the numerical rating scale and the cumulative morphine consumed postoperatively were also measured. <i>Results</i>: The mean pain scores were significantly higher in the Saline Group than in the Lidocaine group. The cumulative morphine consumption after 48 hours was significantly reduced in the study group 4.87 ± 1.80 mg vs 14.13 ± 4.10 mg (P<0.0001). Conclusion: The administration of a bolus dose (1.5 mg/kg) of intravenous lidocaine at induction and a continuous intravenous infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/hr from onset of surgery till skin closure reduced the postoperative pain intensity and morphine consumption in patients undergoing major gynaecological surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Postoperative Pain Control After ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia

Background: Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated. Purpose: To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device. Results: A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; P = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; P = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction. Registration: TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).

Incidence and influential factors of postoperative pruritus in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia

Background: Pruritus is a distressing symptom of systemic opioid analgesia that responds poorly to conventional antipruritus treatments. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative pruritus using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Methods: Opioid-naïve patients who underwent morphine-based IV-PCA for postoperative pain at a tertiary center between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2023, were included retrospectively. The primary outcome was pruritus within 72 h after surgery. Cumulative morphine consumption and pain numerical rating scores were measured to evaluate the potential impact of pruritus on postoperative pain control. Results: A total of 1,696 patients were enrolled, of whom 119 (7.0%) developed pruritus during the study period. Five independent factors for pruritus were identified, including intraoperative uses of hydroxyethyl starch solutions [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–0.43], lockout interval of IV-PCA (aOR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27–0.94, on base-2 logarithmic scale), droperidol addition to morphine solutions (aOR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.81), cumulative morphine dose (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.47–2.12, on base-2 logarithmic scale), and postoperative uses of antihistamines (aOR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.83–4.60) (c-statistic = 0.745). Patients with pruritus had higher postoperative morphine consumption (median: 67.5 mg, interquartile range: 38.3–94.0 vs. 38.0 mg, 21.0–65.4, p<0.0001) but similar pain intensity compared to those without pruritus. Conclusion: Increasing the lockout interval and the droperidol regimen may protect patients from morphine-induced pruritus after IV-PCA. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanisms underlying the anti-pruritus effects of hydroxyethyl starch.

Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique Intercostal Block Vs. Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate morphine consumption and pain scores 24h postoperatively to compare the effects of a bilateral External Oblique Intercostal (EOI) block with those of a Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Trough Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) block in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Fifty-eight patients aged between 18 and 65years of with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II-III were included in this randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were assigned into two groups either EOI block or M-TAPA block. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine consumption within the first postoperative 24h. Secondary outcomes were numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during activity, QoR-15 Patient Questionnaire scores, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), number of patients requiring rescue analgesic and antiemetics drugs, and complications. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of morphine consumption in the first 24h (EOI block; 10.74 ± 3.94mg vs. M-TAPA block; 11.67 ± 4.66mg, respectively). In addition, no significant difference between the two groups in the NRS and PONV scores, total QoR-15 scores, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics and antiemetics. EOI block and M-TAPA block showed similar effectiveness for morphine consumption within 24h postoperatively and in pain scores in LSG.

Effects of anterior quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, observational study

BackgroundThe study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effectiveness of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB3) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), both of which have been documented to provide relief during abdominal surgery.MethodsThis prospective observational study, conducted between February and July 2023, included 96 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients were divided into three groups: QLB3, ESPB, and control (no block) and received the corresponding nerve block in the preanesthetic room for regional block. Cumulative morphine consumption during the initial 24 h after PCNL, numerical rating scale resting/movement scores, intraoperative remifentanil usage, rescue analgesic requirements, time when the first analgesic was requested, and postoperative nausea and vomiting scores were documented and compared between the groups.ResultsTotal median morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was similar in the QLB3 and ESPB groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, 7 mg [(Q1-Q3) 7–8.5]; ESPB, 8 mg [6.5–9]; control, 12.5 [10–17]; P < 0.001). Similarly, median intraoperative remifentanil consumption did not differ between the block groups but was higher in the control group (QLB3, 1082 µg [IQR 805.5–1292.7]; ESPB, 1278 µg [940.2–1297.5]; control, 1561 µg [1315–2068]; P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving rescue analgesic medication was similar in the block groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, n = 9 [30%]; ESPB, n = 14 [46.7%]; control, n = 21 [70%]; P = 0.008).ConclusionsQLB3 and ESPB were adequate and comparable in providing postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after PCNL.Trial registrationThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05822492).

Comparison of erector spinae plane and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial

BackgroundTruncal blocks contribute to multimodal analgesia that enhances early recovery after caesarean delivery. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an established technique that offers somatic abdominal wall analgesia. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane technique that may offer additional visceral analgesic effects. This study hypothesized that ESP block would offer superior analgesic efficacy to TAP block in women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. MethodsSixty-six ASA physical status grade 1–3 (≥18 years) patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP (N = 33) or ESP blocks at the T9 vertebral level (N = 35). The primary outcome measure was 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic request, duration of block placement, numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and movement, effect of pain on activities of daily living (ADLs) and care for the infant, patient analgesic satisfaction, frequency and severity of opioid-related side effects. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in mean (95% CI) 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption between groups: 32.0 (27.0 to 37.0) mg with TAP versus 27.0 (19.9 to 34.0) mg with ESP (p = 0.16). The mean (SD) duration of block placement was longer for ESP than for TAP blocks (10.7 (2.2) minutes versus 9.0 (2.5) minutes; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. ConclusionThis study found similar postoperative opioid use and analgesic efficacy between ESP and TAP block after caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia.Trial Registration: South African National Clinical Trial Registry (DOH-27-102022-5278): https://sanctr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=8100, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202301645957324): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=24267.

Anterior quadratus lumborum block provided superior pain control and reduced opioid consumption in kidney transplantation: A randomized controlled trial.

The research aimed to assess the effectiveness of inside-out anterior quadratus lumborum (QL3) block and local wound infiltration in managing postoperative pain and total morphine dosage following kidney transplantation. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study; 46 end-stage renal disease patients undergoing kidney transplantation were randomly allocated into 2 groups: a QL group (n = 23) receiving 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine using the ultrasound-assisted inside-out technique before wound closure, while the local wound infiltration (LA) group (n = 23) receiving the same dose around the surgical wound and drain at the time of skin closure. The primary outcome measure was the numerical pain rating scale, with secondary outcomes including amount of morphine consumption at various postoperative time points (2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th hours). Patients in the QL group had significantly lower numerical rating scale scores at the 2nd and 4th hours, both at rest and during movement (P < .05). Although pain scores at rest and during movement at later time points were lower in the QL group compared to the LA group, these differences were not statistically significant. Cumulative morphine consumption at postoperative 4th, 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th hours was significantly lower in the QL group (P < .05). No patients experienced complications from the QL3 block. Ultrasound-assisted inside-out QL3 block significantly reduced postoperative pain levels at the 2nd and 4th hours, both at rest and during movement, and led to a reduction in cumulative morphine consumption from the 4th hour postoperatively, and persisting throughout the 24-hour period.

Single-bolus injection of local anesthetic, with or without continuous infusion, for interscalene brachial plexus block in the setting of multimodal analgesia: a randomized controlled unblinded trial

IntroductionPrevious trials favored a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block over a single injection for major shoulder surgery. However, these trials did not administer a multimodal analgesic regimen. This randomized, controlled...

Intermittent intravenous paracetamol versus continuous morphine in infants undergoing cardiothoracic surgery: a multi-center randomized controlled trial

BackgroundTo determine whether intermittent intravenous (IV) paracetamol as primary analgesic would significantly reduce morphine consumption in children aged 0–3 years after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.MethodsMulti-center, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial in four level-3 Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) in the Netherlands and Belgium. Inclusion period; March 2016–July 2020. Children aged 0–3 years, undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were eligible. Patients were randomized to continuous morphine or intermittent IV paracetamol as primary analgesic after a loading dose of 100 mcg/kg morphine was administered at the end of surgery. Rescue morphine was given if numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores exceeded predetermined cutoff values. Primary outcome was median weight-adjusted cumulative morphine dose in mcg/kg in the first 48 h postoperative. For the comparison of the primary outcome between groups, the nonparametric Van Elteren test with stratification by center was used. For comparison of the proportion of patients with one or more NRS pain scores of 4 and higher between the two groups, a non-inferiority analysis was performed using a non-inferiority margin of 20%.ResultsIn total, 828 were screened and finally 208 patients were included; parents of 315 patients did not give consent and 305 were excluded for various reasons. Fourteen of the enrolled 208 children were withdrawn from the study before start of study medication leaving 194 patients for final analysis. One hundred and two patients received intermittent IV paracetamol, 106 received continuous morphine. The median weight-adjusted cumulative morphine consumption in the first 48 h postoperative in the IV paracetamol group was 5 times lower (79%) than that in the morphine group (median, 145.0 (IQR, 115.0–432.5) mcg/kg vs 692.6 (IQR, 532.7–856.1) mcg/kg; P < 0.001). The rescue morphine consumption was similar between the groups (p = 0.38). Non-inferiority of IV paracetamol administration in terms of NRS pain scores was proven; difference in proportion − 3.1% (95% CI − 16.6–10.3%).ConclusionsIn children aged 0–3 years undergoing cardiac surgery, use of intermittent IV paracetamol reduces the median weight-adjusted cumulative morphine consumption in the first 48 h after surgery by 79% with equal pain relief showing equipoise for IV paracetamol as primary analgesic.Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05853263; EudraCT Number: 2015-001835-20.

Role of tramadol as an adjuvant in ultrasound-guided serratus anterior muscle block for modified radical mastectomy - A randomized control trial.

Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is associated with significant acute post-operative pain that may progress to chronic pain syndromes in 25-60% of patients. Serratus anterior muscle (SAM) block has proved to be an excellent analgesic option in patients undergoing MRM. Although many adjuvants have been utilized for the prolongation of analgesia, the role of tramadol in SAM has not been studied as yet. We hypothesize that the addition of tramadol to ropivacaine for SAM block may reduce morphine consumption in the post-operative period in patients undergoing elective MRM surgeries. The primary aim of the study was to compare cumulative post-operative morphine consumption over 24 h in patients receiving SAM block with or without tramadol. The secondary aims were to observe adverse events related to the procedure or medications. The other parameters recorded were non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse rate, respiratory rate, and nausea or vomiting. Patients scheduled to undergo MRM were randomly allocated by block randomization into two groups. The study group (Group T) received a SAM block with 0.25% ropivacaine (18 ml) with tramadol 100 mg while the control group (Group P) received a SAM block with 18 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine and 2 ml of saline. Patients were assessed for pain scores, analgesic requirement, time to first analgesic request, hemodynamic variables, and any side-effects at 30 min, 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h post-operatively. Cumulative morphine consumption over 24 h in the post-operative period was less in the group T (3.06 ± 1.53 mg vs 4.34 ± 1.53 mg; P 0.001). Time to the first analgesic requirement was more in group T (10.44 ± 5.04 h vs 6.11 ± 2.73 h; P < 0.001). Pain scores were significantly lower in the group T at all time points. Tramadol, when used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for SAM block reduces post-operative pain scores in the first 24 h and prolongs the time of first morphine requirement.

Comparison of the analgesic effect of oral morphine with that of intravenous morphine in pediatric patients: multicenter open-label randomized blinded prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND: Certain children with recurrent episodes of acute nociceptive pain experience chronic pain. In accordance with the recommendations of the World Health Organization, short-acting morphine is the main drug used to relieve severe pain and breakthrough pain. In published studies, morphine provided adequate analgesia in the majority (90%) of the patients; however, no such studies have compared the use of morphine tablets with a control group of pediatric patients.&#x0D; OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of morphine tablets at a dose of 5 mg and compare them with those of morphine given intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/mL in children with severe pain syndrome in the postoperative period.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter open randomized blind prospective clinical study was conducted in parallel groups of 100 patients aged 3–18 years with severe pain syndrome in the postoperative period between September 21, 2020, and December 15, 2022. Cumulative morphine consumption, visual analog scale analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction scores, and adverse events (AEs) / serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed.&#x0D; RESULTS: The comparative analysis of the average values of the total number of doses of an additional analgesic drug administered during treatment with the study drug (group 1)/comparison drug (group 2) in patients of different age groups (cohorts 1, 2, 3) did not reveal significant differences (p=0.05). This finding indicated the equal effectiveness of the used forms of drugs in both groups. Moreover, no significant differences were noted in the development of AEs associated with the study drug (group 1) compared with AEs of the reference drug (group 2) in patients of different age groups (cohorts 1, 2, 3); (p=0.05).&#x0D; CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of the study drug in tablets in comparison with an injection drug in children with severe pain syndrome.

Morphine Consumption and/or Numerical Scale in Pain Studies: Silverman Integrating Approach (SIA SCORE)

Introduction: Ligamentoplasty pain management is dynamic performance, demanding constant vigilance and adaptation. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of three techniques for knee ligamentoplasty using an integration score, the SIA score.&#x0D; Methods: The study included 165 patients undergoing primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. The first group, systemic analgesia (SA), received balanced systemic analgesia postoperatively for a minimum of five days, based on Paracetamol, Diclofenac, and a morphine PCA. In addition to the systemic analgesia already described, the second group, femoral analgesia (FA), will benefit from a femoral peri-nervous catheter in the crural position. The third intra-articular analgesia (IAA) group received, in addition to the same systemic analgesia, an infusion through an epidural catheter of 20 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by maintenance with 8 ml/h of the same local anesthetic via an electric syringe pump for 36 h. Cumulative morphine consumption was assessed, as well as pain at rest, using a numerical scale (EN) from 1 to 10 and an integration of these two parameters.&#x0D; Results: Morphine consumption was lower in the AF group. The lowest mean rank was in the AF group, followed by the AIA group, and the difference was statistically significant with an H = 6.89 and a p= 0.032. The difference was significant between the AS group and the AF group (p = 0.09); the other inter-group differences were not significant. 23.2% of patients had an AIS score between [-100, -200], and were in little pain and consumed little morphine (effective treatment); 14.2% of patients had an AIS score between [100, 200] and were in great pain and consumed a lot of morphine (morphine-resistant or very sensitive to pain).&#x0D; Conclusion: Analgesia in the femoral peri-nerve group was more effective, with a reduction in mean EN compared with the other two groups.

Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block or Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block and Postoperative Analgesia after Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: The management of postoperative pain following lumbar disc herniation (LDH) surgery is crucial for the quality of recovery. The effectiveness of multimodal analgesia plans increases when interfascial plane blocks are included. This study sought to compare the analgesic efficacy of preoperative ultrasound-guided TLIP (thoracolumbar interfascial plane) blocks and posterior QLBs (quadratus lumborum blocks) in patients undergoing LDH surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing elective LDH surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups: thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (Group T) and posterior quadratus lumborum block (Group Q). Block applications were performed 30 min before anesthesia induction. In the postoperative period, analgesia control was provided with a patient-controlled analgesia device. The patients’ 24 h cumulative opioid consumption was examined. Pain scores were evaluated in the 0th, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, and 24th hours. Results: The mean 24 h cumulative morphine consumption for patients was statistically insignificant when Groups T and Q were compared (9.14 ± 7.03 mg vs. 8.66 ± 6.58 mg, p = 0.788). Pain scores at rest and during movement as well as morphine consumption were similar between groups in the 0th, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, and 24th hours (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions: The study determined that the utilization of TLIP blocks and posterior QLBs prior to anesthesia induction yielded comparable outcomes in terms of reducing postoperative analgesic consumption and enhancing the efficacy of multimodal analgesia in individuals undergoing single-distance lumbosacral spine surgery under general anesthesia.

Pulmonary Lobectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer with Uniportal versus Three-Portal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Results from a Single-Centre Randomized Clinical Trial.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is a consolidated approach; however, there is no consensus on the number of ports leading to less postoperative pain. We compared early postoperative pain after uniportal and three-portal VATS lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC. In this randomized clinical trial, patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were randomly assigned to receive uniportal (U-VATS Group) or three-portal (T-VATS Group) VATS. The inclusion criteria were age ≤ 80 years and ASA < 4. The exclusion criteria were clinical T3, previous thoracic surgery, induction therapy, chest radiotherapy, connective tissue or vascular diseases, major organ failure, and analgesics or corticosteroids use. The postoperative analgesia protocol was based on NRS. Pain was measured as analgesic consumption; the secondary endpoints were intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate, surgical time, dissected lymph nodes, hospital stay, and respiratory function. Out of 302 eligible patients, 120 were included; demographics were distributed homogeneously. The mean cumulative morphine consumption (CMC) in the U-VATS Group after 7 days was lower than in the T-VATS Group (77.4 mg vs. 90.1 mg, p = 0.003). Intraoperative variables and postoperative complications were comparable. The 30-day intercostal neuralgia rate was lower in the U-VATS Group, without reaching statistical significance. Patients undergoing U-VATS showed a lower analgesic consumption compared with the T-VATS Group; analgesic consumption was moderate in both groups.

Erector spinae plane block for post-operative analgesia in thoracolumbar spine surgery: A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims: Thoracolumbar spine surgery is one of the most painful surgical procedures. This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effect of erector spinae plane (ESP) block on post-operative cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Methods: Seventy adults posted for thoracolumbar spine surgery were randomised into the control group [Number of patients (n)=35], who received general anaesthesia without any nerve block, and the intervention group (n = 35), who received bilateral ultrasound (US)-guided ESP block at the level of spine surgery with 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL after standard general anaesthesia. Along with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine, post-operative analgesia was standardised for both groups. Total morphine consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) score to evaluate pain, overall patient satisfaction, and any side effects were compared at 24 h. The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results: Post-operative total morphine consumption at 24 h was significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group [5.69 (1.549) versus 9.51 (1.634) mg; P &lt; 0.001]. Post-operative VAS scores were also significantly decreased in the intervention group at rest (P &lt; 0.001) and on movement (P &lt; 0.001). Patient satisfaction scores were more favourable in the intervention group [3.8 (0.4) versus 3.2 (0.6); P &lt; 0.001]. Post-operative nausea and vomiting were found more in the control group but were not significant (n = 14 versus 8; P = 0.127). Conclusion: US-guided ESP block significantly reduces post-operative morphine consumption and improves analgesia and patient satisfaction without adverse effects in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery.

Does Adding an IPACK Block to the Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block Improve the Quality of Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroplasty under Spinal Anesthesia? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a commonly performed orthopedic procedure, and is often accompanied by significant postoperative pain. The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB), similar to an anterior lumbar plexus block, is frequently used in hip surgeries. The interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block is a regional anesthesia technique that targets the posterior innervation of the knee capsule. This retrospective study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of SIFIB and SIFIB + IPACK on patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study revealed the data collected from a tertiary hospital. Patient data were gathered for individuals who underwent unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia during the period between 1 January 2023 and 1 September 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised patients falling within ASA class I-III, those following a standardized perioperative analgesia regimen, and individuals receiving opioids via a patient-controlled analgesia device (PCA) as part of their postoperative pain management strategy. Patients were grouped as SIFIB and SIFIB + IPACK according to the performed regional anesthesia technique. Results: In the study, the data of 88 patients in total, 61 in the SIFIB group and 27 in the IPACK group, were analyzed. The 24 h cumulative morphine consumption was similar in the SIFIB and SIFIB + IPACK groups (10.62 ± 6.58 mg vs. 12.55 ± 8.84 mg, respectively; p: 0.258). The NRS scores of the groups were similar in all time frames. Conclusions: Our study reveals that combining IPACK with SIFIB in the multimodal analgesia plan does not provide additional benefits in terms of postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing unilateral THA under spinal anesthesia.

Evaluation of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block in Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective, Randomized, Feasibility Study.

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures, and patients complain of severe pain in the postoperative period. The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB) works as an anteriorly applied lumbar plexus block and is frequently used in hip surgeries. In this study, we evaluated the effect of SIFIB in patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia. This study is a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded feasibility study conducted in a tertiary hospital. Eighty-six patients with ASA I-III were initially enrolled, and after exclusions, 80 patients were randomized into two equal groups (SIFIB and control groups). The standard multimodal analgesia was applied to the control group, while SIFIB was additionally applied to the block group. The study measured the morphine requirement in PCA and pain intensity using Numeric Rating Scores between the two groups. the 24-h cumulative morphine consumption was lower in Group SIFIB. Although there was a decrease in NRS at rest scores in the SIFIB group during some time periods, pain was moderate, and no differences in pain scores were recorded during exercise in all patients. In patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia, a single shot of SIFIB results in a significant reduction in the amount of morphine consumed in hours. This effect was most likely related to a decrease in pain at rest in the SIFIF group.

Comparative Study Between Systemic Balanced Analgesia, Continuous Femoral Perineural Analgesia and Continuous Intra-articular Analgesia for Primary Reconstruction Surgery of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee

Introduction. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of three techniques for knee ligamentoplasty and quadricipital deficit with a view to early physiotherapy. Hypothesis. Continuous intra-articular analgesia and well-managed systemic analgesia could replace continuous femoral peri-nerve analgesia in resource-limited countries. Material. - We included 165 patients undergoing primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. All patients underwent spinal anaesthesia. The first group, systemic analgesia (SA), received balanced systemic analgesia postoperatively for a minimum of five days, based on Paracetamol, Diclofenac and a morphine PCA. In addition to the systemic analgesia already described, the second group, femoral analgesia (FA), will benefit from a femoral peri-nervous catheter in the crural position. 20 ml of bupivacaine at 0.125% concentration is injected; maintenance is set up immediately with a continuous flow of 8 ml/h for 36 h. The third intra-articular analgesia (IAA) group received, in addition to the same systemic analgesia, an infusion through an epidural catheter of 20 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by maintenance with 8 ml/h of the same local anesthetic via an electric syringe pump for 36 h. Cumulative morphine consumption, pain estimation at rest and on mobilization using a numerical scale (EN) from 1 to 10, and quadriceps deficit were evaluated. Results. - Morphine consumption was lower in the AF group and the difference was statistically significant with an F = 3.539(2) and a p = 0.031. A mean difference of 6.12 ± 2.41 between the AS and AF groups with a significant p = 0.012, a mean difference of 1.67 ± 2.41 with a non-significant p = 0.49 between the AF and AIA groups and a mean difference of 4.45 ± 2.31 with a p = 0.056 at the limit of significance between the AS and AIA groups. Analgesia in the femoral peri-nerve group was more effective, with a reduction in mean EN compared with the other two groups. Efficacy was statistically significant at H4, then from H24 to H36 compared with systemic analgesia, but not significant compared with intra-articular analgésia. Intra-articular analgesia was only significantly effective compared with systemic analgesia at H36. Quadriceps muscle deficit is an incident specific to femoral blocks. Discussion. - This study suggests that a continuous intra-articular or even a well-conducted systemic analgesia provides satisfactory analgesia for knee ligamentoplasty, compared with a more effective femoral peri-nerve. The quadricipital lock absent in intra-articular treatment could be an advantage in speeding up functional recovery.

Analgesia for Knee Ligamentoplasty: Comparisons of Three Techniques using the Silverman Integrating Approach (SIA Score)

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of three techniques for knee ligamentoplasty using an integration score, the SIA score. Hypothesis. The use of a statistical approach to integrate data from pain scores and morphine consumption will identify four patient subgroups that may hamper the accuracy of the comparative study Material. - We included 165 patients undergoing primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. All patients underwent spinal anaesthesia. The first group, systemic analgesia (SA), received balanced systemic analgesia postoperatively for a minimum of five days, based on Paracetamol, Diclofenac and a morphine PCA. In addition to the systemic analgesia already described, the second group, femoral analgesia (FA), will benefit from a femoral peri-nervous catheter in the crural position. 20 ml of bupivacaine at 0.125% concentration is injected; maintenance is set up immediately with a continuous flow of 8 ml/h for 36 h. The third intra-articular analgesia (IAA) group received, in addition to the same systemic analgesia, an infusion through an epidural catheter of 20 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by maintenance with 8 ml/h of the same local anesthetic via an electric syringe pump for 36 h. We evaluated cumulative morphine consumption, pain estimation at rest using a numerical scale (EN) from 1 to 10, and an integration of these two parameters. Results. - The mean age was identical for all three groups, at around 30 years. Analgesia in the femoral peri-nerve group was more effective, with a reduction in mean EN compared with the other two groups. Morphine consumption was lower in the AF group. The lowest mean rank was in the AF group, followed by the AIA group, and the difference was statistically significant with an H = 6.89 and a p= 0.032. The difference was significant between the AS group and the AF group (p = 0.09); the other inter-group differences were not significant. 23.2% of patients had an AIS score between [-100, -200], and were in little pain and consumed little morphine (effective treatment); 14.2% of patients had an AIS score between [100, 200] and were in great pain and consumed a lot of morphine (morphine-resistant or very sensitive to pain). For the difference (ranked pain score - ranked morphine), 4.5% of cases had values between [- 100, - 200] and were therefore not very painful but consumed a lot of morphine (propensity), while 3.9% had values between [100, 200] and were therefore very painful but consumed little morphine (intolerant). Discussion. - This study suggests that the use of a statistical approach to integrating data from pain scores and morphine consumption, such as the Silverman Integrating Approach (SIA), will yield four patient subgroups that may hamper the accuracy of the comparative study, including the morphine-resistant subgroup and the propensity subgroup. Comparison of the means of the therapeutic efficacy group will eventually be more precise. Continuous femoral block really does provide added analgesia and morphine sparing, and should therefore be preferred wherever possible to intra-articular or systemic therapy.