Cumulative Local Tumor Progression Rates Research Articles

Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Lung Neoplasm: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

PurposeTo retrospectively investigate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation by analyzing results in patients with lung neoplasm accompanied by interstitial lung disease (ILD) on computed tomography (CT) in a multicenter study. Materials and MethodsPatients with lung neoplasm accompanied by ILD who underwent RF ablation between April 2002 and October 2017 at 7 institutions were investigated. Technical success rate and local tumor progression (LTP) of ablated tumors were evaluated. Adverse events including acute exacerbation of ILD were also evaluated. Univariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with acute exacerbation. ResultsForty-nine patients with 64 lung neoplasms (mean diameter, 22.6 mm; range, 4–58 mm) treated in 66 sessions were included. Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on CT was identified in 23 patients (47%). All patients underwent successful RF ablation. Acute exacerbations were seen in 5 sessions (8%, 7% with UIP pattern and 8% without) in 5 patients, all occurring on or after 8 days (median, 12 days; range, 8–30 days). Three of those 5 patients died of acute exacerbation. Treatment resulted in mortality after 5% of sessions, representing 6% of patients. Pleural effusion and fever ≥ 38°C after RF ablation were identified by univariate analysis (P = .0012 and P = .02, respectively) as significant risk factors for acute exacerbation. The cumulative LTP rate was 43% at 1 year. ConclusionsRF ablation appears feasible for patients with lung neoplasm complicated by ILD. Acute exacerbation occurred in 8% of patients with symptoms occurring more than 8 days after ablation and was associated with a 45% mortality rate.

TACE-assisted multi-image guided radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 5cm: a retrospective study.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with ablation alone often results in high rates of recurrence and metastasis, reaching up to 25.9% within two years. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)-assisted multi-image guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of stage Ia HCC according to the China liver cancer staging (CNLC). This study enrolled and analyzed a total of 118 patients diagnosed with HCC, each with a single nodular lesion no larger than 5cm, who received TACE-RFA as first-line therapy between February 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021. The median/mean follow-up period was 29.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.8-36.2 months] and 31.8 months (95% CI: 27.5-36.0 months), respectively. We assessed the treatment's effectiveness, potential complications, and survival rate. The technical success rate was 100% (118/118) after the initial treatment. Out of the total, 3 out of 118 patients (2.5%) developed local tumor progression (LTP) during the follow-up period. The median time for LTP was 29.0 months (95%CI: 21.9-36.1 months; mean: 31.5 months; range 1-92 months). At 1, 3, 5, and 7 years after treatment, the cumulative LTP rates were 0%, 4.6%, 4.6%, and 4.6%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 100%, 95.2%, 95.2%, and 95.2%, respectively. In total, 28 patients experienced minor Grade B complications, and no major complications or treatment-related mortality occurred. The treatment of CNLC stage Ia HCC using TACE-assisted multi-image-guided RFA was found to be both safe and feasible.

No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation Using Twin Cooled Wet Electrodes for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Locoregional Treatments.

To evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) using twin cooled wet (TCW) electrodes in patients experiencing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after undergoing locoregional treatments. We conducted a prospective, single-arm study of NT-RFA involving 102 patients, with a total of 112 recurrent HCCs (each ≤ 3 cm). NT-RFA with TCW electrodes was implemented under the guidance of ultrasonography (US)-MR/CT fusion imaging. If NT-RFA application proved technically challenging, conversion to conventional tumor puncture RFA was permitted. The primary metric for evaluation was the mid-term cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) observed post-RFA. Cumulative LTP rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to explore factors associated with LTP. Considering conversion cases from NT-RFA to conventional RFA, intention-to-treat (ITT; including all patients) and per-protocol (PP; including patients not requiring conversion to conventional RFA alone) analyses were performed. Conversion from NT-RFA to conventional RFA was necessary for 24 (21.4%) out of 112 tumors. Successful treatment was noted in 111 (99.1%) out of them. No major complications were reported among the patients. According to ITT analysis, the estimated cumulative incidences of LTP were 1.9%, 6.0%, and 6.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years post-RFA, respectively. In PP analysis, the cumulative incidence of LTP was 0.0%, 1.3%, and 1.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The number of previous locoregional HCC treatments (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.265 per 1 treatment increase; P = 0.004), total bilirubin (aHR, 7.477 per 1 mg/dL increase; P = 0.012), and safety margin ≤ 5 mm (aHR, 9.029; P = 0.016) were independently associated with LTP in ITT analysis. NT-RFA using TCW electrodes is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent HCC, with 6.0% (ITT analysis) and 1.3% (PP analysis) cumulative incidence of LTP at 2 and 3-year follow-ups.

Application and evaluation of hydrodissection in microwave ablation of liver tumours in difficult locations.

To investigate the safety and mid-term outcomes of hydrodissection-assisted microwave ablation (MWA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in various difficult locations. A total of 131 HCC patients who underwent ultrasound-guided MWA from March 2017 to March 2019 were included. Following ultrasound examination, patients with tumors at difficult locations were treated with hydrodissection-assisted MWA (hydrodissection group), while those with tumors at conventional locations received MWA (control group). Both groups were compared concerning baseline characteristics, ablation parameters, complete ablation rates, and complication rates. Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed local tumor progression and overall survival, with stratified analysis for different difficult locations (adjacent to gastrointestinal tract, diaphragm, and subcapsular tumors). Additionally, Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of different difficult locations on these outcomes. Complete ablation rates were similar between the hydrodissection and control groups (91.4% vs. 95.2%, P>0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in three patients, including liver abscess and biliary injury. No significant differences in major or minor complication rates were found between the groups (P>0.05). Local tumor progression was detected in 11 patients (8.4%) at the end of the follow-up period. Neither cumulative local tumor progression rate (P=0.757) nor overall survival rate (P=0.468) differed significantly between the groups. Stratified analysis showed no effect of tumor location difficulty on cumulative local tumor progression or overall survival. Tumor number and size served as independent predictors for overall survival, while minimal ablation margin ≤ 5mm independently predicted local tumor progression. In contrast, the tumor location was not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses corroborated the robustness of the models. Hydrodissection-assisted MWA for HCC in various difficult locations demonstrated safe and effective, with complete ablation and mid-term outcomes comparable to those for tumors in conventional locations.

Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Infeasible for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparative Study with General Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Outcomes.

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation (TACE + RFA) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) measuring ≤3 cm infeasible for ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous RFA. Twenty-four patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided TACE + RFA for single HCC between January 2012 and December 2016 were screened. To evaluate the TACE + RFA outcomes compared with those of US-guided RFA, 371 patients who underwent US-guided RFA during the same period were screened. We compared local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) between the two groups before and after propensity score (PS) matching, and performed univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for all patients. PS matching yielded 21 and 42 patients in the TACE + RFA and US-guided RFA groups, respectively. Cumulative LTP rates after PS matching were not significantly different between the two groups at 1 (0.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.072), 2 (10.5% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.701), and 5 years (16.9% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.531). IDR rates did not differ significantly between the two groups at 1 (20.6% vs. 10%, p = 0.307), 2 (25.9% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.999), or 5 years (49.9% vs. 53%, p = 0.838). Multivariable analysis showed that treatment type was not a significant factor for LTP or IDR. The outcomes of TACE + RFA for HCC were similar to those of general US-guided RFA. Fluoroscopy-guided TACE + RFA may be an effective treatment when US-guided RFA is not feasible.

Comparing Long-Term survival benefits of hepatocellular carcinoma between thermal ablation monotherapy and combined therapy with transarterial Chemoembolization: A propensity score matched study

PurposeTo compare the long-term survival benefits of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in thermal ablation (TA) monotherapy and TA combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using propensity score matching (PSM). Materials and MethodsBetween 1 January 2015 and 28 February 2021, 432 consecutive patients (357 men, 75 women; age range, 20–87 years) with HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0-B) underwent ultrasonography-guided percutaneous TA, which included radiofrequency ablation (n = 340) and microwave ablation (n = 92). The association between combined treatment of TACE prior to TA versus TA monotherapy and survival prognosis was evaluated, including (a) local tumor progression (LTP) by using a logistic regression model, and (b) disease-free survival (DFS) and (c) overall survival (OS) by using a Cox proportional hazards model according to propensity score matched data. ResultsAfter PSM, the final matched cohort consisted of 146 patients, with 73 receiving TA monotherapy and 73 receiving TA combined with TACE. The cumulative LTP rates did not show a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.960). Neither the DFS nor OS rate was significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.070 and P = 0.680, respectively). The multivariate analysis identified two significant findings. Firstly, ultrasound echo, minimal ablative margin, and high risk of tumor burden score were found to be associated with LTP. Secondly, the type of TA, Child-Turcotte-Pugh grade, ablation time, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. ConclusionThe differences in LTP, DFS, and OS rates of HCC patients were found to be statistically non-significant between TA monotherapy and TACE + TA groups. For HCC patients with BCLC stage 0-B, the combination treatment of TACE prior to TA may be not associated with long-term survival benefits relative to TA monotherapy.

Fusion imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation with artificial ascites or pleural effusion in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas: the feasibility rate and mid-term outcome

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility rate and the mid-term outcomes of fusion imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with artificial ascites or pleural effusion of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) based on tumor locations. Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 456 patients with single HCCs ≤4 cm were referred for RFA from April 2019 to April 2020. The tumor locations were classified into a conventional location (CL) and difficult location (DL, close to the diaphragm/heart/major vessels/bile ducts/gastrointestinal tract/kidneys). This study assessed the feasibility rate of CT/MRI-US fusion system-guided RFA with artificial ascites or pleural effusion and the therapeutic outcomes including technical success, technique efficacy, and local tumor progression (LTP) according to tumor location. Cumulative LTP rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: 235 of 456 (51.5%) patients had HCCs in DL. Ablation was feasible in 431 of 456 (94.5%) patients. The feasibility rate was significantly lower in DL group than in CL group (89.8% [211/235] vs. 99.5% [220/221], p < 0.001). The technical success and technique efficacy rates were 100% [211/211] vs. 99.5% [219/220] and 98.6% [208/211] vs. 100% [220/220] in DL and CL groups, respectively (p > 0.05). The estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP rates in DL group were 1.0%, 2.5%, and 2.5%, respectively, and were not significantly different from the 2.3%, 3.9%, and 3.9% observed in CL group (p = 0.456). Conclusion: Fusion imaging-guided RFA with artificial ascites or pleural effusion could decrease technically infeasible cases and provide comparable LTP rates for HCCs in DL to HCCs in CL.

Treatment Outcomes of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Effects of the Electrode Type and Placement Method.

To investigate the association among the electrode placement method, electrode type, and local tumor progression (LTP) following percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and to assess the risk factors for LTP. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 211 patients, including 150 males and 61 females, who had undergone ultrasound-guided RFA for a single HCC < 3 cm. Patients were divided into four combination groups of the electrode type and placement method: 1) tumor-puncturing with an internally cooled tip (ICT), 2) tumor-puncturing with an internally cooled wet tip (ICWT), 3) no-touch with ICT, and 4) no-touch with ICWT. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for LTP. The major RFA-related complications were assessed. Overall, 83, 34, 80, and 14 patients were included in the ICT, ICWT, no-touch with ICT, and no-touch with ICWT groups, respectively. The cumulative LTP rates differed significantly among the four groups. Compared to tumor puncturing with ICT, tumor puncturing with ICWT was associated with a lower LTP risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0-0.88, P = 0.034). However, the cumulative LTP rate did not differ significantly between tumor-puncturing with ICT and no-touch RFA with ICT (aHR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.03-1.62, P = 0.188) or ICWT (aHR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0-2.28, P = 0.294). An insufficient ablative margin was a risk factor for LTP (aHR = 6.13, 95% CI = 1.41-22.49, P = 0.019). The major complication rates were 1.2%, 0%, 2.5%, and 21.4% in the ICT, ICWT, no-touch with ICT, and no-touch with ICWT groups, respectively. ICWT was associated with a lower LTP rate compared to ICT when performing tumor-puncturing RFA. An insufficient ablation margin was a risk factor for LTP.

Predictive Value of Ablative Margin Assessment After Microwave Ablation for Local Tumor Progression in Medium and Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography Image Fusion Method Versus Side-by-Side Method.

This study aimed to explore the feasibility and predictive value for local tumor progression (LTP) of the computed tomography (CT)-CT image fusion method versus side-by-side method to assess ablative margin (AM) in hepatocellular carcinoma ≥3 cm in diameter. We selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ≥3 cm in diameter who underwent microwave ablation and had complete tumor ablation. We used the CT-CT image fusion method and side-by-side method to assess AM separately and divided the lesions into 3 groups: group I, minimum ablative margin (min-AM) <0 mm (the ablation zone did not fully cover the tumor); group II, 0 mm ≤ min-AM <5 mm; and group III, min-AM ≥5 mm. A total of 71 patients involving 71 lesions were included. The κ coefficient for the agreement between the CT-CT image fusion method and the side-by-side method in assessing min-AM was 0.14 (P = 0.028). Cumulative LTP rate was significantly different between groups by min-AM from the CT-CT image fusion method (P < 0.05) but not by min-AM from the side-by-side method (P = 0.807). Seventeen of the 20 LTP lesions were located at min-AM on fused CT images, with consistency rate of 85%. Compared with the side-by-side method, the CT-CT image fusion method is more accurate in assessing the AM of eccentrically ablated lesions and shows better predictive value for LTP. The min-AM based on CT-CT image fusion assessment is an important influencing factor for LTP.

Percutaneous ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a comparison between the outcomes of ultrasound guidance and CT guidance using propensity score matching.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of percutaneous ablation guided by ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) in colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM). This study included patients with CLOM treated with percutaneous ablation from January 2008 to January 2021 in this observational study. Only lesions visualized on both CT and US images were further analyzed according to whether patients' initial ablation treatments utilized US guidance or CT guidance. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival after propensity score matching (PSM). The LTP-free survival and treatment-related outcomes were compared between these two groups. PSM identified 116 patients from each group, with 269 and 238 lesions in the USguided and CT-guided groups, respectively. US-guided ablation had a shorter average procedure time and lower cost than CT-guided ablation (27.54±12.06 minutes vs. 32.70±13.88 minutes, P=0.003; $2,175.13±618.17 vs. $2,455.49±710.25, P=0.002). For patients >60 years of age, the cumulative LTP rate at 1 year was lower in the US-guided group than in the CT-guided group (17.8% vs. 25.1%, P=0.038). For patients with perivascular liver lesions, the cumulative LTP rate at 1 year was lower in the US-guided group (14.4% vs. 28.2%, P=0.040). For patients whose age is >60 years or who have perivascular liver lesions, USguided ablation is better than CT-guided ablation, with a shorter treatment time and lower costs when both ablation methods are feasible for patients.

Microwave ablation versus surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study of long-term therapeutic outcomes.

The therapeutic efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been well characterized. We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of MWA and surgical resection (SR) in patients with subcapsular HCC. This retrospective study comprised 321 patients with subcapsular HCC meeting the Milan criteria who received MWA (n = 99) or SR (n = 222). Local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM) to compare the therapeutic efficacy. In the total cohort, there were no significant differences in 5-year LTP rates (14.0% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.12), OS rates (70.7% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.63), and DFS rates (38.3% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.22) between the MWA and SR groups. After PSM, the cumulative LTP rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 9.7%, 14.0%, and 16.4% in the MWA group (n = 84) and 7.2%, 8.6%, and 10.6% in the SR group (n = 84), respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.31). Neither corresponding OS rates (96.4%, 84.8%, and 73.0% vs. 95.2%, 85.5%, and 72.1%, p = 0.89) nor DFS rates (76.0%, 52.6%, and 38.1% vs. 76.2%, 44.7%, and 32.3%, p = 0.43) were significantly different between the MWA and SR groups. Whereas MWA obtained fewer complications for both cohorts (both p < 0.05). MWA showed comparable long-term therapeutic outcomes to SR, and it might be an alternative curative option for subcapsular HCC within the Milan criteria. • Microwave ablation showed comparable local tumor progression, overall survival, and disease-free survival to surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria. • Microwave ablation obtained fewer complications and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Can "no-touch" radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma improve local tumor control? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but local tumor progression (LTP) has been a main limitation of RFA. This study aims to evaluate the LTP of percutaneous no-touch RFA (NtRFA) for HCC ≤ 5 cm and compare with conventional RFA (intratumoral puncture) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on percutaneous NtRFA for HCC ≤ 5 cm. The pooled proportions of the overall and cumulative incidence rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for LTP after NtRFA were assessed using a random-effects model. For studies comparing NtRFA with conventional RFA, relative risks (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) were meta-analytically pooled with LTP as the outcome. Twelve studies with 900 patients were included. The pooled overall rate of LTP after NtRFA was 6% (95% CI, 4-8%). The pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidence rates of LTP were 3% (95% CI, 2-5%), 5% (95% CI, 3- 9%), and 8% (95% CI, 6-11%), respectively. Compared to conventional RFA, the pooled RR and HR of LTP were 0.26 (95% CI, 0.16-0.41) and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11-0.70), respectively (both p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis including only randomized controlled studies also showed better local tumor control of NtRFA with HR of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.14-0.42). Percutaneous NtRFA is an effective treatment for HCC ≤ 5 cm with an overall LTP rate of 6% and provides lower LTP compared with conventional RFA. • The pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidence rates of local tumor progression after no-touch radiofrequency ablation for HCC ≤ 5 cm were 3% (95% CI, 2-5%), 5% (95% CI, 3-9%), and 8% (95% CI, 6-11%). • No-touch radiofrequency ablation had significantly lower rates of local tumor progression compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; relative risk, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16-0.41; p < 0.01, respectively).

CT-monitored minimal ablative margin control in single-session microwave ablation of liver tumors: an effective strategy for local tumor control

ObjectivesTo investigate the usefulness of minimal ablative margin (MAM) control by intra-procedural contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in microwave ablation (MWA) of liver tumors.MethodsA total of 334 consecutive liver tumors (240 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs] and 94 colorectal liver metastases [CRLMs]) in 172 patients treated with percutaneous MWA were retrospectively included. MAM of each tumor was assessed after expected ablation completion using intra-procedural CECT, allowing within-session additional ablation to any potentially insufficient margin. On immediate post-MWA MRI, complete ablation coverage of tumor and final MAM status were determined. The cumulative local tumor progression (LTP) rate was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. To identify predictors of LTP, Cox regression analysis with a shared frailty model was performed.ResultsIntra-procedural CECT findings prompted additional ablation in 18.9% (63/334) of tumors. Final complete ablation coverage of tumor and sufficient MAM were determined by MRI to be achieved in 99.4% (332/334) and 77.5% (259/334), and their estimated 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year LTP rates were 3.2%, 7.5%, and 12.9%; and 1.0%, 2.1%, and 6.9%, respectively. Insufficient MAM on post-MWA MRI, perivascular tumor location, and tumor size (cm) were independent risk factors for LTP (hazard ratio = 14.4, 6.0, and 1.1, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, and p = 0.011, respectively), while subcapsular location and histology (HCC vs CRLM) were not.ConclusionsIn MWA of liver tumors, intra-procedural CECT monitoring of minimal ablative margin facilitates identification of potentially suboptimal margins and guides immediate additional intra-session ablation to maximize rates of margin-sufficient ablations, the latter being a highly predictive marker for excellent long-term local tumor control.Key Points• In MWA of liver tumors, intra-procedural CECT can identify potentially suboptimal minimal ablative margin, leading to immediate additional ablation in a single treatment session.• Achieving a finally sufficient ablative margin through the MWA with intra-procedural CECT monitoring of minimal ablative margin results in excellent local tumor control.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in treatment of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases：a single-center experience

Purpose To investigate the local tumor control of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM). Materials and methods From March 2011 to December 2020, 23 patients with 39 NETLM treated with percutaneous RFA were studied. The study assessed the therapeutic outcomes after RFA, including the rates of technical success, technical efficacy, major complications, local tumor progression (LTP) and overall survival. Cumulative LTP rates were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results The technical efficacy rate was 91.3% (21/23) at one month after RFA. No major complication occurred in the treatment. LTP occurred in 50% (11/22) of patients who had complete ablation, with a median progression-free survival time of 15 months (1–61 months). Patients with Ki-67 < 5% had a longer progression-free survival than those with Ki-67 ≥ 5% (22.0 vs. 3.5 months, p<.001). Four patients, who had sporadic recurrent liver metastases, received 1-6 times of additional RFA after the initial treatment. Twenty patients were alive at the end of this study, except three patients withdrawn. The overall survival was at a median of 48 months (9–182 months). Conclusion RFA provides effective local tumor control with low morbidity and it can be applied repeatedly over years to control recurrence of NETLM. Patients with Ki-67 < 5% have better local tumor control with percutaneous RFA of NETLM.

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for subphrenic hepatocellular carcinoma.

PurposeRadiofrequency ablation is a curative treatment option for very early-stage or early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) for subphrenic tumors is technically challenging. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) has been used to overcome this disadvantage. This study compared the treatment outcomes between LRFA and PRFA for subphrenic HCC.MethodsThis retrospective study screened patients who underwent PRFA or LRFA for subphrenic HCC between 2013 and 2018. Therapeutic outcomes, including local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), extrahepatic metastasis (EM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between the two groups.ResultsThirty patients in the PRFA group and 23 patients in the LRFA group were included. LTP was observed in six patients in the PRFA group (20%), but in no patients in the LRFA group. The cumulative LTP rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 3.7%, 23.4%, and 23.4%, respectively, in the PRFA group and 0.0% in the LRFA group (P=0.015). The IDR, EM, and DFS rates were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.304, P=0.175, and P=0.075, respectively). The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96.6%, 85.7%, and 71.6%, respectively, in the PRFA group and 100%, 95.7%, and 95.7%, respectively, in the LRFA group (P=0.049).ConclusionLRFA demonstrated better therapeutic outcomes than did PRFA for subphrenic tumors in terms of LTP and OS. Therefore, LRFA can be considered as the first-line treatment option for subphrenic HCC.

Suppression of Local Tumor Progression in Perivascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Combination Therapy with Radiofrequency Ablation and Percutaneous Ethanol Injection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background and Aims: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has replaced percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) as the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, control of local tumor progression (LTP) remains a challenge in perivascular HCC. The aim of this study was to determine whether PEI added to RFA can reduce the LTP rate in perivascular HCC patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 167 patients, with 197 newly diagnosed HCC nodules with peritumoral vessels, who underwent either RFA plus PEI or RFA monotherapy as the first-line treatment between June 2001 and April 2015. Ethanol was injected inside the tumor close to the peritumoral vessels in the combination therapy group. Patients were matched 1:1 according to their propensity scores to reduce selection bias; cumulative LTP was then analyzed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Results: The two matched groups comprised 62 tumors each. The overall median follow-up period was 34 months (range, 1–140 months). In the RFA plus PEI group, the cumulative LTP rates were 5.7%, 15.5%, and 20.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively; in the RFA monotherapy group, the rates were 13.2%, 32.0%, and 40.2%, respectively. The rates were significantly lower in the RFA plus PEI group (p = 0.032). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that PEI combination treatment was significantly associated with a reduced risk of local HCC recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.93; p = 0.031). Discussion/Conclusion: The risk of LTP after RFA for perivascular HCC can be significantly reduced by injecting ethanol close to the peritumoral vessels.

Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.

Thermal ablation is now accepted as one of the curative treatments for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the efficacy of this treatment for subcapsular HCC is not well characterized. Therefore, we aimed to compare the outcomes of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with subcapsular HCC. In total, 195 patients with subcapsular HCC who met the Milan criteria and underwent MWA or RFA were included. Local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), recurrence beyond the Milan criteria (RBM), and complications of these patients were compared. After propensity score matching, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative LTP rates were 6.7%, 9.6%, and 11.4% in the MWA group, and 13.4%, 24.6%, and 29.1% in the RFA group, respectively (p = 0.006). The cumulative rates of RBM were lower in patients treated with MWA than in those treated with RFA (4.4% versus 12% at 1year; 14.5% versus 23.0% at 3years; and 37.4% versus 53.9% at 5years; p = 0.03). The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5years were 97.1%, 85.9%, and 73.4% in the MWA group, and 95.6%, 80.4%, and 61.4% in the RFA group, respectively (p = 0.36). The rate of major complications showed no significant difference between the MWA group and the RFA group (17.4% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.33). Compared to RFA, MWA showed better tumor control for subcapsular HCC within the Milan criteria. There was no difference in the incidence of major complications between the two groups. •Compared to radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation showed better local tumor control for patients with subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma. •Microwave ablation showed similar major complication rates for patients with subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma. •Microwave ablation may be preferred for patients with subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma when they need to receive thermal ablation.

Laparoscopic Hepatic Resection Versus Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation for Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinomas Smaller Than 3 cm: Analysis of Treatment Outcomes Using Propensity Score Matching.

ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic outcomes of laparoscopic hepatic resection (LHR) and laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) for single subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and MethodsWe screened 244 consecutive patients who had received either LHR or LRFA between January 2014 and December 2016. The feasibility of LRFA in patients who underwent LHR was retrospectively assessed by two interventional radiologists. Finally, 60 LRFA-feasible patients who had received LHR and 29 patients who had received LRFA as the first treatment for a solitary subcapsular HCC between 1 cm and 3 cm were finally included. We compared the therapeutic outcomes, including local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups before and after propensity score (PS) matching. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was also used to evaluate the difference in OS and RFS between the two groups for all 89 patients.ResultsPS matching yielded 23 patients in each group. The cumulative LTP and OS rates were not significantly different between the LHR and LRFA groups after PS matching (p = 0.900 and 0.003, respectively). The 5-year LTP rates were 4.6% and 4.4%, respectively, and OS rates were 100% and 90.7%, respectively. The RFS rate was higher in LHR group without statistical significance (p = 0.070), with 5-year rates of 78.3% and 45.3%, respectively. OS was not significantly different between the LHR (reference) and LRFA groups in multivariable analyses, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.12–1.54) (p = 0.818). RFS was higher in LHR (reference) than in LRFA without statistical significance in multivariable analysis, with an HR of 2.01 (0.87–4.66) (p = 0.102).ConclusionThere was no significant difference in therapeutic outcomes between LHR and LRFA for single subcapsular HCCs measuring 1–3 cm. The difference in RFS should be further evaluated in a larger study.

Long-term outcomes of combined transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation versus RFA monotherapy for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm: emphasis on local tumor progression

Purpose To compare the long-term outcomes of combined transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation (TACE-RFA) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) monotherapy for small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Methods A total of 248 patients with 329 HCC nodules who underwent TACE-RFA or RFA monotherapy as the only first-line treatment between January 2009 and December 2020 were included in this study. The technical success, complications, survival rate, and local tumor progression (LTP) rate were compared between the two treatments. Results The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were similar between the two groups (98.7%, 93.0% and 75.9% vs 97.4%, 88.0% and 77.4%; p = 0.444). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative LTP rates were significantly lower in the TACE-RFA group than in the RFA monotherapy group (2.9%, 9.2%, and 13.8% vs. 5.2%, 17.0%, and 21.0%; p = 0.043). Subgroup analyses suggested that TACE-RFA showed significantly lower LTP rates than RFA monotherapy for small HCC with tumor size>2cm (p = 0.008), subphrenic location (p = 0.021), and perivessel (p = 0.030). Furthermore, HCC with well-defined lipiodol deposition in the TACE-RFA group showed better local tumor control than the small HCC in the RFA monotherapy group (p = 0.013). There was no significant difference in the technical success rates (p = 0.064) and complication rates (p = 0.952) between the two groups. Conclusions TACE-RFA is superior to RFA monotherapy in providing local tumor control for small HCC with tumor size 2–3 cm in diameter, subphrenic location, perivessel and HCCs with well-defined lipiodol deposition by TACE before RFA.

Efficacy of Superselective Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Guidance Software for Hepatocellular Carcinoma within Three Lesions Smaller Than 3 cm.

Simple SummaryAlthough transarterial chemoebolization (TACE) is indicated for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a second choice, TACE for small HCC is frequently difficult and less effective because of less hypervascularity and the presence of tumor portions receiving a dual blood supply. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of superselective cTACE under guidance software for patients with HCC within three lesions smaller than 3 cm. By using TACE guidance software, 81.2% of HCC lesions could be completely embolized and the cumulative local tumor progression rates in 303 tumors at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 17.8, 27.8, 32.0, and 36.0%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates in 175 patients were 97.1 and 68.7, 82.8 and 34.9, 64.8 and 20.2, and 45.3 and 17.3%, respectively. Our results indicate the efficacy of superselective cTACE using guidance software for HCC within three lesions smaller than 3 cm.The indication of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has advanced to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A when surgical resection (SR), thermal ablation, and bridging to transplantation are contraindicated; however, TACE for small HCC is frequently difficult and ineffective because of less hypervascularity and the presence of tumor portions receiving a dual blood supply. Here, we report outcomes of superselective conventional TACE (cTACE) for 259 patients with HCCs within three lesions smaller than 3 cm using guidance software. Automated tumor feeder detection (AFD) functionality was applied to identify tumor feeders on cone-beam computed tomography during hepatic arteriography (CBCTHA) data. When it failed, the feeder was identified by manual feeder detection functionality and/or selective angiography and CBCTHA. Regarding the technical success in 382 tumors (mean diameter, 17.2 ± 5.9 mm), 310 (81.2%) were completely embolized with a safety margin (5 mm wide for HCC ≤25 mm and 10 mm wide for HCC >25 mm). In 61 (16.0%), the entire tumor was embolized but the safety margin was not uniformly obtained. The entire tumor was not embolized in 11 (2.9%). Regarding the tumor response at 2–3 months after cTACE in 303 tumors excluding those treated with combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or SR and lost to follow-up, 287 (94.7%) were classified into complete response, seven (2.3%) into partial response, and nine (3.0%) into stable disease. The mean follow-up period was 44.9 ± 27.6 months (range, 1–109) and the cumulative local tumor progression rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 17.8, 27.8, 32.0, and 36.0%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates in 175 patients, excluding those with Child–Pugh C class, who died of other malignancies, or who underwent combined RFA or hepatic resection, were 97.1 and 68.7, 82.8 and 34.9, 64.8 and 20.2, and 45.3 and 17.3%, respectively. Our results indicate the efficacy of superselective cTACE using guidance software for HCC within three lesions smaller than 3 cm.