Cue-based Feeding Research Articles

Barriers and Facilitators in Lactation Support for the Preterm Mother-Infant Dyad: An Integrated Approach.

Breastfeeding offers significant health benefits for both mothers and infants, particularly preterm infants, where it serves as a therapeutic strategy to reduce mortality and morbidities. However, breastfeeding practices are threatened globally by societal norms and systemic barriers at both micro and macro levels. This paper explores the complex interplay of these barriers and facilitators, focusing on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting. Preterm infants face specific feeding challenges due to immature physiological functions, yet evidence supports that strategies like cue-based feeding and individualized care can enhance feeding success and health outcomes. For mothers, initiating and maintaining lactation after preterm birth is critical but challenging, with early lactation support and achieving sufficient milk volume being key predictors of success. Partner support significantly influences lactation outcomes, although more inclusive research is needed for diverse family structures. In the NICU, a multidisciplinary approach to lactation care is vital, emphasizing the need for experienced staff and family-centered practices. NICU design, policies promoting parental presence, and adherence to Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative guidelines further support breastfeeding. This paper aims to provide directives for local breastfeeding policies through an integrated approach, considering societal attitudes and healthcare practices. The findings advocate for improved lactation support in NICUs, inclusive language and policies, and further research into diverse familial and gender roles in breastfeeding.

Cue-based feeding in the NICU-a pathway to earlier oral feeding of preterm infants.

To compare volume-driven and cue-based feeding of low birth weight preterm infants, regarding short-term outcomes, including transition to oral feeds, weight gain, and length of stay. This was a retrospective cohort study. Feeding and weight gain outcomes were compared between infants fed by volume-driven and cue-based feeds. The groups were subdivided by birth weight categories. The study group included 240 low birth weight preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestation, 120 infants fed by volume-driven feeding were compared to 120 infants fed by cue-based feeding. The groups were sub-analyzed by birth weight categories: <1,500 g and 1,500-2,500 g. Study groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics and neonatal morbidities. Infants fed by cue-based feeding were more likely to achieve full oral feeding faster and at an earlier gestational age. Infants with a birth weight <1,500 g were less likely to experience adverse respiratory episodes during cue-based feeding. Although the rate of weight gain was reduced in cue-based feeding in the heavier infant group, discharge weight, breastfeeding rates, and length of stay were comparable between the groups. Cue-based feeding results in faster transition to full oral feeding in very low birth weight preterm infants and at an earlier gestational age.

Effect of cue-based feeding on time to nipple feed and time to discharge in very low birth weight infants

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a cue-based feeding protocol in improving time to nipple feed and time to discharge in very low birth weight infants in a Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Demographic, feeding, and discharge data were recorded and compared between the two cohorts. The pre-protocol cohort included infants born from August 2013 through April 2016 and the post-protocol cohort included infants born from January 2017 through December 2019. 272 infants were included in the pre-protocol cohort and 314 infants in the post-protocol cohort. Both cohorts were statistically comparable in gestational age, gender, race, birthweight, prenatal care, antenatal steroid use, and rates of maternal diabetes. There were statistically significant differences between the pre- versus post-protocol cohorts in median post-menstrual age (PMA) in days at first nipple feed (PO) (240 vs 238, p = 0.025), PMA in days at full PO (250 vs 247, p = 0.015), and length of stay in days (55 vs 48, p = 0.0113). Comparing each year in the post-protocol cohort, for each outcome measure, a similar trend was noted in 2017 and 2018, but not in 2019. In conclusion, the cue-based feeding protocol was associated with a decrease in the time to first PO, time to full nipple feeds, and the length of stay in very-low-birthweight infants.

Development of a Foundation Protocol for Feeding Complex Care Neonates and Enablers and Barriers to Its Implementation

ABSTRACT A continuing quality improvement project was undertaken as part of a twelve-month Clinical Neonatal Research Fellowship. The project was to develop a cue-based feeding protocol for cardiac surgical neonates with the aim of decreasing the time taken to establish full oral feeds. The aim was expanded to include all complex care infants in NICU as infants with other diagnoses may also benefit from consistency in feeding practices addressing suck feed and also nutrition goals. A review of the literature identified that feeding challenges are not always directly related to an infant’s primary diagnosis. Feeding is not just an activity of daily living (oral milk feeding) but also a term used to describe a therapeutic intervention (enteral nutrition). There is potential mismatch between nutritional requirement, developmental readiness, and suck feed ability in all complex care infants. A six-stage flow diagram was developed that allows for multidisciplinary input. It is presented visually as “steps” increasing in height from left to right. Infant vital signs, hunger, and state cues inform decision-making around oral suck feeding. This includes the provision of “Feeding Associated Experiences.” Individualized variations can be incorporated including existing feeding related protocols. The project demonstrated that it is possible to develop an inclusive, whole of admission feeding protocol that addresses oral suck feed and nutrition goals for complex care infants. Implementation strategies for the project were adapted from a comparable project. A theoretical domains framework was used to identify enablers and barriers to its implementation that will be addressed beyond the Fellowship term. Enablers were the developmental care workplace culture, the protocol’s inclusiveness, a bed chart tool, and other visual references. Barriers to its success were the project unit’s physical environment, the existing developmental care framework, and competing documentation. Adapting implementation strategies used in a similar setting is no guarantee of success. Identifying unique enablers and barriers to implementation will support modification to practice and ongoing change in units caring for complex care infants.

Providing Equitable Postpartum Breastfeeding Support at an Urban Academic Hospital

ObjectiveTo equitably increase exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge among obstetrician/gynecologist resident service clients by 20% over 8 weeks. DesignThis quality improvement project used a plan–do–study–act format to implement interventions with patients and staff based on the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Run charts were used to evaluate intervention effects over time according to Institute for Healthcare Improvement criteria, and outcome data informed tests of change for subsequent cycles. Setting/Local ProblemPostpartum clients of an obstetrician/gynecologist resident service were found to be less likely to exclusively breastfeed compared to the hospital average (7% vs. 34%) at baseline. A baseline resident client survey (n = 20) showed that 75% believed it best to give human milk plus formula. ParticipantsOf 186 postpartum participants, 65% identified as breastfeeding at the time of birth (53% of Hispanic participants [n = 99], 52% of non-Hispanic Black participants [n = 44], and 73% of non-Hispanic White participants [n = 33]). Interventions/MeasuresThe World Health Organization’s revised Implementation Guidance for the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative provided the basis for all interventions, which included a prenatal infant feeding plan, postpartum educational video with teach-back, cue-based feeding log, breastfeeding education guidelines for postpartum nurses, and team engagement via huddles. Measures assessed whether each intervention met the intended goals. ResultsRates of exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge were 7% at baseline and 13% after implementation. Rates of exclusive breastfeeding among Black clients were 0% at baseline and 16% after implementation. Clients demonstrated Baby-Friendly knowledge (teach-back average, 89%) but continued to supplement with formula, most often related to supply concerns (65%). ConclusionIntentionally equitable implementation of the Baby-Friendly steps may ameliorate racial disparities in breastfeeding during the early postpartum period. Preparing families to exclusively breastfeed should begin prenatally.

Improving Time to Independent Oral Feeding to Expedite Hospital Discharge in Preterm Infants.

Achievement of independent oral feedings remains the most common barrier to discharge in preterm infants. Early oral feeding initiation may be associated with a lower postmenstrual age (PMA) at independent oral feeding and discharge. In preterm infants born between 25 and 32 weeks' gestation, our aim was to decrease the PMA at independent oral feedings and discharge by 1 week between June 2019 and June 2020. Following formation of a multidisciplinary team, the following plan-do-study-act cycles were targeted: (1) oral feeding initiation at <33 weeks' PMA, (2) cue-based feeding, and (3) practitioner-driven feeding in infants who had not yet achieved independent oral feedings by 36 weeks' PMA. Outcome measures included the PMA at independent oral feeding and discharge. Process measures included adherence to cue-based feeding assessments and PMA at oral feeding initiation. In total, 552 infants with a median gestational age of 30.3 weeks' (interquartile range 28.1-32.0) and birth weight of 1320 g (interquartile range 1019-1620) were included. The PMA at discharge decreased from 38.8 to 37.7 weeks during the first plan-do-study-act cycle, which coincided with an increase in the number of infants initiated on oral feeds at <33 weeks' PMA from 47% to 80%. The age at independent oral feeding decreased from 37.4 to 36.5 weeks' PMA. In preterm infants born between 25 and 32 weeks' gestation, earlier oral feeding initiation was associated with a decreased PMA at independent oral feeding and discharge.

Cue-based feeding and short-term health outcomes of premature infants in newborn intensive care units: a non-randomized trial

BackgroundFeedings based on behavioral cues is a method relying on infants’ behavioral expressions of readiness to feed. The objective of this interventional study was to determine the effect of cue-based feeding on the short-term health outcomes of preterm infants.MethodsThis quasi-experimental study utilized a historical or phase lag design. It involved 60 preterm infants admitted to an Iranian referral hospital’s Level III-Newborn Intensive Care Unit (NICU) from April 2017 until January 2018. The experimental group (n = 30) received a three-step intervention of offering behavioral-cue-based oral (BCBO) feedings: Step 1 – One BCBO feeding every 12 hours for 3 days; Step 2 - Two BCBO feedings every 12 h for 3 days; and Step 3 – All feedings as BCBO feedings for 3 days. The control group received standard care feedings. Group difference data were analyzed with SPSS version 16 using descriptive and inferential statistics.ResultsThe infants’ mean weight at time of discharge for the intervention and control groups were 1492.79 ± 21.65 g and 1395.71 ± 17.61 g (P = .003) respectively. The mean durations of achieving full oral feedings in the intervention and control groups were 17 ± 6 and 20 ± 11 days, respectively (P = .19). The mean frequencies of hypoxia were 1 ± 1.54 and 5 ± 9.31 respectively (P = .03) and of gavage feedings 725 ± 584 and 1846 ± 2097 respectively (P = .009). No apnea events were reported for the intervention group; the frequency of apnea in the control group was 1 ± 2.11 (P = .16).ConclusionThe findings indicate that cue-based feeding is beneficial for preterm infants. Therefore, it is recommended that nurses employ cue-based feeding in the NICU.Trial registrationIRCTID: IRCT20170828035962N2. Registered 27 may 2018 – Retrospectively registered, https://en.irct.ir/trial/27024.

Cue-based versus scheduled feeding for preterm infants transitioning from tube to oral feeding: the Cubs mixed-methods feasibility study.

There is a lack of evidence of the effect of cue-based feeding compared with scheduled feeding on important outcomes for preterm infants. The objectives were as follows: (1) to describe the characteristics, components, theoretical basis and outcomes of approaches to feeding preterm infants transitioning from tube to oral feeding; (2) to identify operational policies, barriers and facilitators, and staff and parents' educational needs in neonatal units implementing cue-based feeding; (3) to co-produce an intervention for feeding preterm infants in response to feeding cues; (4) to appraise the willingness of parents and staff to implement and sustain the intervention; (5) to assess associated costs of implementing cue-based feeding; (6) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a future trial; (7) to scope existing data-recording systems and potential outcome measures; and (8) to determine stakeholders' views of whether or not a randomised controlled trial of this approach is feasible. This was a mixed-methods intervention development and feasibility study comprising (1) a systematic review, case studies, qualitative research and stakeholder consensus; (2) the co-production of the intervention; (3) a mixed-methods feasibility study; and (4) an assessment of stakeholder preferences for a future evaluation. Three neonatal units in the UK (two level 3 units and one level 2 unit). Developmentally normal, clinically stable preterm infants receiving enteral feeds (n = 50), parents (n = 15 pre intervention development; n = 14 in the feasibility study) and health-care practitioners (n = 54 pre intervention development; n = 16 in the feasibility study). An evidence-informed multicomponent intervention comprising training, a feeding protocol, feeding assessment tools, supplementary training materials [including posters, a film and a narrated PowerPoint (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) presentation] and the 'Our Feeding Journey' document. The main outcome measures were recruitment and screening rates, infant weight gain, duration of the intervention, feeding outcomes, implementation outcomes (contextual facilitators and barriers, acceptability, adoption, appropriateness and fidelity) and stakeholder preferences for a future evaluation. The systematic review of 25 studies concluded that evidence in favour of cue-based feeding should be treated cautiously. The case studies and qualitative research highlighted contextual barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of cue-based feeding. The telephone survey found that many neonatal units are considering implementing cue-based feeding. We recruited 37% of eligible infants, and there was good retention in the study until discharge but a high loss to follow-up at 2 weeks post discharge. The mean number of days from intervention to transition to full oral feeding was 10.8, and the mean daily change in weight gain was 25 g. The intervention was acceptable to parents and staff, although there was dissatisfaction with the study documentation. Intervention training did not reach all staff. A cluster-randomised design with a composite outcome was suggested by stakeholders for a future study. The intervention was available only in English. Intervention training did not reach all staff. There was low recruitment to qualitative interviews and observations. Only a small number of medical staff engaged in either the training or the interviews. It is feasible to implement a cue-based feeding intervention with improved training and documentation. Further work is needed to assess the feasibility of a future trial, noting evidence of existing lack of equipoise. The next steps are to digitalise the intervention and conduct a survey of all neonatal units in the UK. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018097317 and ISRCTN13414304. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 74. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The Validity and Reliability of Early Feeding Skills Assessment and Cue-Based Feeding Scales for Preterm Infants

Background: One of the fundamental factors in infants’ readiness to discharge from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is attaining full oral feeding. Determining the infants’ development requires instruments to comprehensively assess the infants’ oral skills and the process of feeding. Objectives: This study aimed to measure the validity and reliability of Early Feeding Skill assessment (EFS) and the subscales of the cue-based feeding (Oral Feeding Readiness scale (OFRS) and Oral Feeding Quality scale (OFQS)). Methods: Participants consisted of 30 preterm infants born at gestational age (GA) ≤ 34 weeks in Dr. Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Infants were enrolled by convenience sampling. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Weighted Kappa were used to measure reliability, and Spearman and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to test convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The inter- and intra-rater reliability of all dimensions of EFS were good (ICC ranged from 0.77 to 0.95) except intra-rater reliabiltiy for the ability to maintain physiologic stability and ability to coordinate swallowing was moderate. The inter-rater reliability of the cue-based feeding scales was excellent (Weighted Kappa of &gt; 0.74). The intra-rater reliablity indicated good agreement for OFRS (Weighted Kappa = 0.73) and excellent agreement for OFQS (Weighted Kappa = 0.75). There was an inverse correlation between most subscales of EFS and cue-based feeding scales (P &lt; 0.05), except the ability to maintain physiologic stability and ability to coordinate swallowing dimensions (P &gt; 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the ability to maintain physiologic stability dimension and post menstrual age (PMA) (r = 38, (P &lt; 0.05) and between the oral feeding recovery assessment and GA (r = 0.37, (P &lt; 0.05). OFQS was inversely correlated with GA and PMA (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: EFS and cue-based feeding scales are valid and reliable scales to assess the oral feeding skills of preterm infants; however, using only one of these scales solely to evaluate infants’ feeding process is not enough.

Cue-Based Feeding as Intervention to Achieve Full Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants Primarily Managed with Bubble CPAP.

Cue-based feeding aims at matching introduction of per oral (PO) feeding with physiological readiness of preterm infants to facilitate PO intake and avoid oral aversion. It was claimed that cue-based feeding may lead to delay in the initiation or achieving full PO feeding in clinical setting primarily using bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The study aimed to examine the association of cue-based feeding with time of introduction and completing oral feeding in infants primarily managed with bubble CPAP. A retrospective analysis where outcomes of preterm infants ≤32 weeks' gestational age (GA) and ≤2,000 g birth weight (BW) were compared after a practice change from volume-based feeding advancement to cue-based feeding. Continuous variables were compared by using t-test and multilinear regression analysis to control for confounding variables. Of the 311 preterm infants who met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 194 were in the cue-based feeding group and 117 were in the volume-based advancement historical comparison group. There were no differences between groups regarding demographic or clinical variables. Postmenstrual age (PMA) of initial feeding assessment was less in the cue-based feeding group. Age of first PO feeding and when some PO was achieved every feed was mildly delayed in the cue-based feeding compared with comparison group, 34 (±1.3) versus 33.7 (±1.2) weeks, and 36.2 (±2.3) versus 36.0 (±2.4) weeks, (p < 0.01) respectively. However, the age of achieving full PO did not differ between groups, 36.8 (±2.2) versus 36.4 (±2.4) weeks (p = 0.13). There was no difference between groups regarding growth parameters at 36 weeks' PMA or at discharge. Similar results were obtained when examining subcategories of infants ≤1,000 g and 1,001 to 2,000 g. Cue-based feeding may not be associated with a delay in achieving full oral feeding or prolongation of the length of stay in preterm infants managed with CPAP. · Cue-based feeding matches introduction of PO feeding with physiological readiness.. · Cue-based feeding may not be associated with a delay in achieving full oral feeding in preterm infants.. · Cue-based feeding is not associated with prolongation of the length of stay in preterm infants.. · Cue based feeding in preterm infants managed with noninvasive bubble CPAP is examined..

Implementation of Cue-Based Feeding to Improve Preterm Infant Feeding Outcomes and Promote Parents’ Involvement

ObjectiveTo implement cue-based feeding for preterm infants and to assess its effects on time to achieve full oral feedings, length of stay, and parents’ involvement in the feeding process. DesignA quality improvement project with a pre–post evidence-based practice implementation design. SettingLevel III NICU in a quaternary hospital in the U.S. Northeast. ParticipantsMedical records of preterm infants from 23 0/7 weeks to 31 6/7 weeks gestational age who were eligible for initiation of oral feeding. Intervention/MeasurementsWe implemented cue-based feeding through staff education and training. We completed a retrospective review of the medical records of 82 preterm infants before implementation and 167 preterm infants after implementation for the outcomes of time to achieve full oral feedings, length of stay, and parents’ involvement in the feeding process. ResultsFor infants 23 0/7 weeks to 27 6/7 weeks gestation, time to achieve full oral feedings decreased by 7 days, length of stay decreased by 4.4 days, and parents’ involvement in the feeding process increased by 80% from before to after implementation. For infants 28 0/7 weeks to 31 6/7 weeks, time to achieve full oral feedings decreased by 6.6 days, length of stay decreased by 2.7 days, and parents’ involvement in the feeding process increased by 49% from before to after implementation. The organization saved $103,950 per year by decreasing length of stay. ConclusionsCue-based feeding decreased time to achieve full oral feedings, decreased length of stay, increased parents’ involvement in the feeding process, and resulted in cost savings for the institution.

Clinical Validation of the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale in Taiwan

PurposeA successful transition from gavage to full oral feeding is a decisive indicator for discharging premature infants from the neonatal intensive care unit. A clinically useful measure of oral feeding readiness would help nurses initiate implementation of the cue-based feeding model in Taiwan. The study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Traditional Chinese Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (TC-POFRAS). Design and methods81 preterm infants were enrolled and assessed by TC-POFRAS regarding their oral feeding readiness. This study included two phases. Phase 1 conducted a cross language validation procedure and item-level content validity indices (I-CVIs) for content validity were estimated. In phase 2, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency at each category and total scale levels were estimated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was estimated to explore the scale's performance. The optimal cut-off value of TC-POFRAS was identified by the best Youden's Index [maximum (sensitivity + specificity − 1)]. ResultsAll of the I-CVIs were 1.00. The whole Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.804 (95% CI = 0.736–0.862), and Cronbach's alpha values were between 0.538 (95% = 0.332–0.689) and 0.687 (95%CI = 0.572–0.781) for categories. The area under ROC was 92.2%, and an optimal cut-off value of TC-POFRAS was 29 (sensitivity: 0.938, specificity: 0.941). ConclusionsThe TC-POFRAS has been verified to be an effective and accurate instrument to determine the initiation of oral feeding in preterm infants. Practice implicationsThe TC-POFRAS is an appropriate and complementary assessment instrument for professionals to conveniently use in clinical practice.

Effectiveness of Cue-Based Feeding Versus Scheduled Feeding in Preterm Infants Using Comprehensive Feeding Assessment Scales: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: One of the most critical criteria in making ready an infant for discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is full oral feeding attainment. Objectives: The present study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of cue-based feeding in preterm infants. Methods: A randomized clinical trial study was designed to compare 37 preterm infants at a gestational age of ≤ 34 weeks in the cue-based feeding group (n = 18) and the scheduled feeding group (n = 19). All participants were evaluated by the Preterm Infant Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (PIOFRAS) and Early Feeding Skill (EFS) scale in four different stages. Outcome measures were weight (grams per day), duration of full oral feeding achievement, duration of hospitalization, postmenstrual age (PMA), and the score of PIOFRAS and EFS. A P-value of less than 0.05 has been considered statistically significant. Results: The duration of full oral feeding achievement was shorter in the cue-based feeding group (3.55 ± 1.24 vs 6.68 ± 2.00, P &lt; 0.001). Infants were discharged earlier in the cue-based feeding group (15.55 ± 5.38 vs 27.10 ± 7.90, P &lt; 0.001). The mean score of PIOFRAS only on the day of discharge in the cue-based feeding group was more than the scheduled feeding group (32.61 ± 1.14 vs 31.90 ± 0.87, P = 0.03). The score of EFS in each dimension was inconsistent in each stage, and differences were observed between two groups in the full oral feeding stage. Conclusions: Although PIOFRAS and EFS demonstrated no difference significantly in most of the stages of achievement in oral feeding between the cue-based feeding group and the scheduled feeding, the process of attainment of oral feeding and discharge from the hospital was more rapid in the cue-based feeding group.

Turkish Neonatal Nurses' Knowledge and Practices Regarding the Transition to Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study

PurposeNeonatal nurses play an important role in preterm infants' safe and successful transition to oral feeding. Little is known about neonatal nurses' knowledge and practices regarding the transition to oral feeding in preterm infants. The aim of this study was to determine neonatal nurses' knowledge levels and clinical practices related to the process of transitioning preterm infants to oral feeding. Design and methodThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 275 neonatal nurses working in the neonatal intensive care units of 9 different hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey. Data were collected using a participant demographic form and a questionnaire about the neonatal nurses' knowledge and practices regarding oral feeding. ResultsThe mean knowledge score of the nurses in this study was 64.7 out of 100 (SD = ±8.7; range = 40–87.5). Rates of correct responses were particularly low for items related to cue-based feeding, interventions to promote oral–motor development, non-nutritive sucking, and infant positioning for oral feeding. All of the NICU nurses participating in the study did not use the protocols developed for transitioning preterm infants to oral feeding. ConclusionsNurses need knowledge and practical training on evidence-based therapeutic interventions that promote oral feeding skills in preterm infants during the transition to oral feeding. The use of protocols developed for transitioning preterm infants to oral feeding is limited in NICUs. Practice ImplicationsIn order to facilitate safe and successful feeding, nurses should improve their knowledge and practical skills regarding the transition to oral feeding and evidence-based therapeutic interventions for preterm infants.

Promoting Infant Mental Health Through Evidence-Informed Interventions to Support Infant Feeding and the Transition to Parenthood: A Clinical Practice Example.

Infant mental health is influenced by many factors including the successful transition to parenthood and the feeding relationship with caregivers. Region of Peel – Public Health in Ontario, Canada promotes infant mental health through interventions that encourage cue-based feeding and responsive infant care that helps individual families meet their infant feeding goals and build a foundation of responsive parenting. Interventions have been developed to meet the needs of a large, ethnically diverse population. The use of a biodevelopmental framework identifying nutrition and the environment of relationships as important foundations of health provided key areas of focus for Nurturing the Next Generation, a public health strategic priority. Research evidence, literature syntheses, local research, and data informed the interventions. The promotion of a positive nursing practice environment supports the public health nurses who deliver these interventions. This framework of effective public health practice contributes to long-term health outcomes, including the promotion of mental health for infants, their families, and the population.

Impact of SIMPLE Feeding Quality Improvement Strategies on Aerodigestive Milestones and Feeding Outcomes in BPD Infants.

Delays with enteral and oral feeding milestones among premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) can be due to provider variation or infant-dependent factors. Our objectives with this study were to compare aerodigestive milestones and length of stay in BPD infants after implementing a quality improvement program to improve feeding outcomes. Using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement model for quality improvement, we implemented the simplified, individualized, milestone-targeted, pragmatic, longitudinal, and educational (SIMPLE) feeding strategy to enhance feeding and aerodigestive milestones among BPD infants. The key interventions addressed were as follows: (1) enteral feed initiation and advancement protocol; (2) oral feeding progression guidelines, optimization of respiratory support, feeding readiness scores, nonnutritive breastfeeding, and cue-based feeding; (3) active multidisciplinary collaboration; and (4) family-centered care. Comparisons were made between baseline (January 2009 to March 2010) and SIMPLE feeding strategy (May 2010 to December 2013) groups. Both groups included infants between 23 0/7 and 32 6/7 weeks' birth gestation, and ≤34 weeks' postmenstrual age at admission and discharge. The baseline group and SIMPLE feeding group included 92 patients and 187 patients, respectively. Full enteral feeding, first oral feeding, full oral feeding, and length of stay milestones were (all P < .05) achieved sooner in the SIMPLE feeding group. Although the overall prevalence of BPD in the 2 groups is similar, the incidence of moderate BPD has decreased (P < .05) and severe BPD has increased (P < .05) in the SIMPLE feeding group. SIMPLE feeding strategy advances postnatal maturation and acquisition of feeding milestones irrespective of the severity of BPD and impacts the length of stay, thereby lowering resource use.

Does the Infant-Driven Feeding Method Positively Impact Preterm Infant Feeding Outcomes?

Achievement of independent oral feeding is a major determinant of discharge and contributes to long lengths of stay. Accumulating evidence suggests that there is great variation between and within newborn intensive care units in the initiation and advancement of oral feeding. The Infant-Driven Feeding (IDF) method is composed of 3 behavioral assessments including feeding readiness, quality of feeding, and caregiver support. Each assessment includes 5 categories and is intended as a method of communication among caregivers regarding the infant's readiness and progression toward independent oral feeding. To identify and summarize the available evidence on the use of the IDF method at initiation of oral feeds, time to independent oral feedings, and length of stay in the newborn intensive care unit or level II nursery for preterm infants. Four databases including CINAHL, Medline/PubMed, Ovid Nursing, and Embase were searched for "infant guided feedings," "infant driven feeding," "cue-based feeding," and "co regulated feeding." The full text of 32 articles was reviewed to identify experimental, quasiexperimental, or retrospective design to assess the evidence related to cue-based feeding. There were no randomized control, quasi-experimental, or retrospective studies utilizing the IDF method. There were 3 quality improvement projects utilizing the IDF method. The findings were conflicting: 1 project found the IDF method favorable in the achievement of full oral feedings, 2 projects found the IDF method favorable for reducing length of stay, and 1 project did not find differences in initiation, achievement of oral feedings, or length of stay. There is scant evidence limited to quality improvement projects to support the use of the IDF method. Research is needed to empirically validate the IDF method and to inform practice related to the initiation and advancement of oral feeding for preterm infants.

Supporting Optimal Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants and Children With Congenital Heart Disease.

Improved survival has led to increased recognition of developmental delays in infants and children with congenital heart disease. Risk factors for developmental delays in congenital heart disease survivors may not be modifiable; therefore, it is important that lifesaving, high-technology critical care interventions be combined with nursing interventions that are also developmentally supportive. Implementing developmental care in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit requires change implementation strategies and widespread support from all levels of health care professionals. This manuscript reviews developmentally supportive interventions such as massage, developmentally supportive positioning, kangaroo care, cue-based feeding, effective pain/anxiety management, and procedural preparation and identifies strategies to implement developmentally supportive interventions in the care of infants and children with congenital heart disease. Improving developmental support for these infants and children at high risk for developmental delay may improve their outcomes and help promote family-centered care.

Getting to Full Feeds Faster in the Nicu Utilizing Cue-based Feeding

Getting to Full Feeds Faster in the Nicu Utilizing Cue-based Feeding

Cue-Based Feeding in the NICU

In NICU settings, caring for neonates born as early as 23 weeks gestation presents unique challenges for caregivers. Traditionally, preterm infants who are learning to orally feed take a predetermined volume of breast milk or formula at scheduled intervals, regardless of their individual ability to coordinate each feeding. Evidence suggests that this volume-driven feeding model should be replaced with a more individualized, developmentally appropriate practice. Evidence from the literature suggests that preterm infants fed via cue-based feeding reach full oral feeding status faster than their volume-feeding counterparts and have shorter lengths of stay in the hospital. Changing practice to infant-driven or cue-based feedings in the hospital setting requires staff education, documentation, and team-based communication.