While the article “To catch a WIMP” by Andrew Watson (Research News, 21 Mar., p. 1736) provides a useful overview of experimental ideas for searching for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), it could give a misleading impression of the relative merits of different techniques, as only a small minority of approximately 20 experiments described are likely to be capable of making a positive identification of the most favored particle candidate. Currently, the only theory that predicts a new weakly interacting massive particle and provides estimates of its range of mass and interaction rates is supersymmetry. The experimental challenge is to differentiate—to a precision of 0.1% to 1%—between low energy nuclear-recoil events from dark matter interactions and background electron-recoil events from gamma and beta decay. Only two of the techniques mentioned in the article appear to have such capability. One is the Ge detector of the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) collaboration, which simultaneously measures both thermal energy and ionization. The other is the planned liquid-xenon detector (the U.K. Dark Matter Collaboration—a University of California, Los Angeles-U.K. collaboration), which will simultaneously measure both scintillation and ionization. It is likely that larger detectors with even more powerful discrimination will be needed to prove conclusively the existence of WIMP dark matter. While this is a daunting task, the discovery of supersymmetric particles in the galactic dark matter could bring particle physics back to the realm of “small” experiments—analogous to the birth of particle physics in the early cosmic-ray studies.