At present, many test methods and models have been used to evaluate the fatigue performance of pavement materials. However, different test methods and material types have a significant impact on the fatigue result evaluation. Thus, to evaluate the fatigue characteristics of different pavement materials under diverse test methods, the strength and fatigue performance of three pavement materials were characterized through direct tension, uniaxial compression, and indirect tensile tests at multiple loading rates and stress levels. In this paper, three pavement materials, such as SBS-modified asphalt mixture (SBS-MAM), crumb rubber asphalt mixtures (CRAM), and cement-stabilized macadam (CSM), were tested. On this basis, the strength yield surface models related to loading rates and the fatigue normalized unified model of three pavement materials under various stress states were established. Comparing the differences among the three pavement materials' fatigue performance, the results show that the fatigue results of the three pavement materials were completely different under dissimilar test methods. The conventional fatigue equation cannot evaluate the influence of specimen size and stress state on fatigue performance. However, the fatigue normalization model established in this paper can settle these problems. It is also clear that the fatigue performance of CSM is superior to those of the other two mixtures when the stress level is small. However, the fatigue life of CSM is significantly more sensitive to the stress level than those of the other two mixtures. Based on the establishment and comparative analysis of the normalized models of fatigue characteristics of different pavement materials, the scientific conversion of pavement material fatigue to structural fatigue is realized, which provides sights into the anti-fatigue design of pavement structures.
Read full abstract