Development Of Cross-tolerance Research Articles

Inducible Gut-Specific Carboxylesterase SlCOE030 in Polyphagous Pests of Spodoptera litura Conferring Tolerance between Nicotine and Cyantraniliprole

Insecticides tolerance in herbivorous arthropods is associated with preadaptation to host plant allelochemicals. However, how plant secondary metabolites activate detoxifying metabolic genes to develop tolerance remains unclear. Herein, the tolerance of Spodoptera litura larvae to cyantraniliprole was increased after nicotine exposure. An S. litura α esterase, SlCOE030, was predominantly expressed in the midgut and induced after exposure to cyantraniliprole, nicotine, and cyantraniliprole plus nicotine. Drosophila melanogaster with ectopically overexpressed SlCOE030 enhanced cyantraniliprole and nicotine tolerance by 4.91- and 2.12-fold, respectively. Compared to UAS-SlCOE030 and Esg-GAL4 lines, the Esg > SlCOE030 line laid more eggs after nicotine exposure. SlCOE030 knockdown decreased the sensitivity of nicotine-treated S. litura larvae to cyantraniliprole. Metabolism assays indicated that recombinant SlCOE030 protein metabolizes cyantraniliprole. Homology modeling and molecular docking analysis demonstrated that SlCOE030 exhibits effective affinities for cyantraniliprole and nicotine. Thus, insect CarEs may result in the development of cross-tolerance between synthetic insecticides and plant secondary metabolites.

Stress history affects heat tolerance in an aquatic ectotherm (Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

The stress history of an ectotherm may be a pivotal predictor of how they cope with rapid spikes in environmental temperature. An understanding of how stressors in habitats and commercial operations affect ectotherm heat tolerance is urgently required so that management actions can be informed by thermal physiology. We hypothesised that brief exposure to mild stress would heighten tolerance to subsequent heat stress, indicative of a cross-tolerance interaction, whereas exposure to severe stress would reduce heat tolerance, reflecting a cross-susceptibility interaction. To test this hypothesis, we assessed how three acute stressors (salinity shock [10 or 33 ppt for 2 h]), air exposure (1 or 5 min) and crowding [95.6 kg m−3 for 2 h]), commonly experienced by fish, affected the heat tolerance (measured as critical thermal maximum, CTMAX) in juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Fish were exposed to one of the three stressors and left for 24 h of recovery prior to measuring CTMAX. Heat tolerance was improved by ∼0.6 °C in fish exposed to salinity shock (10 ppt) and air exposure (5 min) compared to unstressed controls, demonstrating cross-tolerance. However, the development of cross-tolerance was non-linear with stressor severity, and crowding stress had no effect on CTMAX. Together these results show that some forms of stress can heighten acute heat tolerance in ectotherms, but the development of cross-tolerance is highly specific to both stressor type and stressor severity.

Papel de los estímulos ambientales asociados a la droga en el desarrollo de tolerancia cruzada a los efectos de taquicardia de la nicotina y el alcohol en humanos

According to the Pavlovian conditioning model, drug tolerance is modulated by drug-associated environmental cues. This study evaluated the contribution of drug-associated cues in the development of cross-tolerance to the tachycardic effects of nicotine from tobacco and alcohol in human subjects. Forty undergraduate students were recruited for this experiment, and each student was randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions. Twenty students smoked nicotine-containing cigarettes in context A and placebo cigarettes in context B, and twenty students smoked nicotine-containing cigarettes in context B and placebo cigarettes in context A. A cross-tolerance test was carried out by dividing the subjects in each condition into two subgroups (n = 10). Each subgroup consumed alcohol in both contexts (A and B). The results of this experiment showed that cross-tolerance between nicotine and alcohol was exhibited only if the cross-tolerance test was carried out in the same context where tolerance had developed to the nicotine from tobacco. These results support the hypothesis that drug-associated environmental stimuli play a modulatory role in the development of cross-tolerance between nicotine from tobacco and alcohol.

Characterization of the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal DALDA peptides following bolus intrathecal delivery.

Background and aims We systematically characterized the potency and side effect profile of a series of small opioid peptides with high affinity for the mu opioid receptor. Methods Male Sprague Dawley rats were prepared with intrathecal (IT) catheters, assessed with hind paw thermal escape and evaluated for side effects including Straub tail, truncal rigidity, and pinnae and corneal reflexes. In these studies, DMT-DALDA (dDAL) (H-Dmt-D-Arg-Phe-Lys-NH2 MW=981), dDALc (H-Dmt-Cit-Phe-Lys-NH2 MW=868), dDALcn (H-Dmt-D-Cit-Phe-Nle-NH2 MW=739), TAPP (H-Tyr-D-Ala-Phe-Phe-NH2 MW=659), dDAL-TICP ([Dmt1]DALDA-(CH2)2-NH-TICP[psi]; MW=1519), and dDAL-TIPP (H-Dmt-D-Arg-Phe-Lys(Nε-TIPP)-NH2 were examined. In separate studies, the effects of approximately equiactive doses of IT DMT DALDA (10 pmol), morphine (30 nmol) and fentanyl (1 nmol) were examined on formalin-induced flinching at different pretreatment intervals (15 min - 24 h). Results (1) All agents resulted in a dose-dependent reversible effect upon motor function (Straub Tail>Truncal rigidity). (2) The ordering of analgesic activity (%MPE) at the highest dose lacking reliable motor signs after bolus delivery was: DMT-DALDA (80%±6/3 pmol); dDALc (75%±8/1 pmol); dDALcn (84%±10/300 pmol); TAPP (56%±12/10 nmol); dDAL-TICP (52%±27/300 pmol). (3) All analgesic effects were reversed by systemic (IP) naloxone (1 mg/kg). Naltrindole (3 mg/kg, IP) had no significant effect upon the maximum usable peptide dose. (4) Tolerance and cross-tolerance development after 5 daily boluses of DMT-DALDA (3 pmol) and morphine (30 nmol) revealed that both agents displayed a progressive decline over 5 days. (5) Cross-tolerance assessed at day 5 revealed a reduction in response to morphine in DMT-DALDA treated animal but not DMT-DALDA in the morphine treated animal, indicating an asymmetric cross-tolerance. (6) IT DMT-DALDA, morphine and fentanyl resulted in significant reductions in phase 1 and phase 2 flinching. With a 15 min pretreatment all drugs resulted in comparable reductions in flinching. However, at 6 h, the reduction in flinching after DMT-DALDA and morphine were comparably reduced while fentanyl was not different from vehicle. All effects on flinching were lost by 24 h. Conclusions These results emphasize the potent mu agonist properties of the DALDA peptidic structure series, their persistence similar to morphine and their propensity to produce tolerance. The asymmetric cross-tolerance between equiactive doses may reflect the relative intrinsic activity of morphine and DMT-DALDA. Implications These results suggest that the DALDA peptides with their potency and duration of action after intrathecal delivery suggest their potential utility for their further development as a spinal therapeutic to manage pain.

Role of thermal stress on development of cross tolerance to toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis in wild Culex quinquefasciatus

Impact of thermal stress on survival and development of cross tolerance to toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) in larvae of field collected Culex quinquefasciatus was evaluated. To assess the thermal stress, late third instar larvae were exposed to variable temperatures viz. 39°C, 40°C, 41°C, 42°C, 43°C, 44°C and 45°C. All larvae survived up to 60 minutes of exposure at 39°C whereas hundred percent larval mortality was observed after 180 minutes of exposure at 40°C, followed by 135 min exposure at 41°C, 70 min exposure at 42°C, 35 min exposure at 43°C, 15 min exposure at 44°C and 10 min exposure at 45°C respectively. To understand the efficacy, larvae were treated with various concentrations of Bti as per WHO protocol and it was observed that 5%, 23%, 70%, 73%, 81% and 100% larval mortality found after treatment at 0.5 ppm, 1.0 ppm, 1.5 ppm, 2.0 ppm, 2.5 ppm and 3.0 ppm respectively. Further, in order to assess the cross tolerance level to Bti, larvae pre-adapted at 39°C for 60 min, 90 min and 120 min duration were re-exposed to Bti solution of 1.0 and 1.5 ppm. Data indicated that the temperature pre-adapted larvae showed 2.6 and 1.5 fold less larval mortality than the non-adapted (control) larvae revealing thermal stress do play an important role in the development of cross tolerance to toxins of Bti in wild Culex quinquefasciatus.

The Two-Component System ChtRS Contributes to Chlorhexidine Tolerance in Enterococcus faecium.

Enterococcus faecium is one of the primary causes of nosocomial infections. Disinfectants are commonly used to prevent infections with multidrug-resistant E. faecium in hospitals. Worryingly, E. faecium strains that exhibit tolerance to disinfectants have already been described. We aimed to identify and characterize E. faecium genes that contribute to tolerance to the disinfectant chlorhexidine (CHX). We used a transposon mutant library, constructed in a multidrug-resistant E. faecium bloodstream isolate, to perform a genome-wide screen to identify genetic determinants involved in tolerance to CHX. We identified a putative two-component system (2CS), composed of a putative sensor histidine kinase (ChtS) and a cognate DNA-binding response regulator (ChtR), which contributed to CHX tolerance in E. faecium Targeted chtR and chtS deletion mutants exhibited compromised growth in the presence of CHX. Growth of the chtR and chtS mutants was also affected in the presence of the antibiotic bacitracin. The CHX- and bacitracin-tolerant phenotype of E. faecium E1162 was linked to a unique, nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism in chtR Transmission electron microscopy showed that upon challenge with CHX, the ΔchtR and ΔchtS mutants failed to divide properly and formed long chains. Normal growth and cell morphology were restored when the mutations were complemented in trans Morphological abnormalities were also observed upon exposure of the ΔchtR and ΔchtS mutants to bacitracin. The tolerance to both chlorhexidine and bacitracin provided by ChtRS in E. faecium highlights the overlap between responses to disinfectants and antibiotics and the potential for the development of cross-tolerance for these classes of antimicrobials.

Withdrawal from Chronic Nicotine Exposure Produces Region-Specific Tolerance to Alcohol-Stimulated GluA1 Phosphorylation.

Nicotine use increases alcohol drinking, suggesting that the combination of these drugs may produce synergistic effects in activating reward circuitry. Alternatively, use of either of these drugs may facilitate the development of cross-tolerance to the other to promote intake escalation. In this study, adult male Wistar rats were chronically exposed to room air or chronic, intermittent nicotine vapor, which has been shown to produce symptoms of nicotine dependence as evidenced by elevated nicotine self-administration and a host of somatic and motivational withdrawal symptoms. We examined regional neuroadaptations in nicotine-experienced versus nonexperienced animals, focusing on changes in phosphorylation of the AMPA glutamate channel subunit GluA1 in reward-related brain regions as excitatory neuroadaptations are heavily implicated in both alcohol and nicotine addiction. During withdrawal, nicotine exposure and alcohol challenge (1g/kg) interactively produced neuroadaptations in GluA1 phosphorylation in a brain region-dependent manner. Alcohol robustly increased protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of GluA1 at serine 845 in multiple regions. However, this neuroadaptation was largely absent in 3 areas (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal striatum, and central amygdala) in nicotine-experienced animals. This interactive effect suggests a molecular tolerance to alcohol-stimulated phosphorylation of GluA1 in the context of nicotine dependence. Nicotine may modify the rewarding or reinforcing effects of alcohol by altering glutamate signaling in a region-specific manner, thereby leading to increased drinking in heavy smokers.

Functional interaction and cross-tolerance between ethanol and Δ9-THC: Possible modulation by mouse cerebellar adenosinergic A1/GABAergic-A receptors

We have previously shown a functional motor interaction between ethanol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) that involved cerebellar adenosinergic A1 and GABAergic A receptor modulation. We now report the development of cross-tolerance between intracerebellar Δ9-THC and intraperitoneal ethanol using ataxia as the test response in male CD-1 mice. The drugs [Δ9-THC (20μg), N6-cyclohexyladenosine, CHA (12ng), muscimol (20ng)] used in the study were directly microinfused stereotaxically via guide cannulas into the cerebellum except ethanol. Δ9-THC, infused once daily for 5 days followed 16h after the last infusion by acute ethanol (2g/kg) and Rotorod evaluation, virtually abolished ethanol ataxia indicating development of cross-tolerance. The cross-tolerance was also observed when the order of ethanol and Δ9-THC treatment was reversed, i.e., ethanol injected once daily for 5 days followed 16h after the last ethanol injection by Δ9-THC infusion. The cross-tolerance appeared within 24–48h, lasted over 72h and was maximal in 5-day ethanol/Δ9-THC-treated animals. Finally, tolerance in chronic ethanol/Δ9-THC/-treated animals developed not only to ethanol/Δ9-THC-induced ataxia, respectively, but also to the ataxia potentiating effect of CHA and muscimol, indicating modulation by cerebellar adenosinergic A1 and GABAA receptors. A practical implication of these results could be that marijuana smokers may experience little or no negative effects such as ataxia following alcohol consumption. Clinically, such antagonism of ethanol-induced ataxia can be observed in marijuana users thereby encouraging more alcohol consumption and thus may represent a risk factor for the development of alcoholism in this segment of population.

Novel 3‐substituted rimonabant analogues lack Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol‐like abuse‐related behavioural effects in mice

Previous structure-activity relationship studies with analogues of the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant have demonstrated that a subset of these analogues with 3-substituent replacements of rimonabant's pyrazole core displayed cannabimimetic profiles seemingly independent of CB1 receptors. We sought to further evaluate these analogues in several behavioural models sensitive to detecting THC-like abuse liability. Selected analogues were tested in a battery of tests in mice to replicate previous findings. Cross-generalization tests were conducted in mice trained to discriminate either THC or O-6629 from vehicle. Rimonabant and its analogues were also evaluated in substitution and challenge tests. Finally, development of cross-tolerance between THC and O-6211 in the mouse test battery was assessed. O-6629 and O-6658 produced dose-dependent acute cannabimimetic activity in mice, but neither substituted for nor antagonized THC's discriminative stimulus. Cross-substitution was observed with O-6658 in mice discriminating O-6629, whereas rimonabant neither substituted for nor attenuated the O-6629 discriminative stimulus. THC and morphine did not generate O-6629-like responding. Cross-tolerance did not develop in mice repeatedly treated with THC when tested with O-6211 in the mouse test battery. While some overlap exists between the pharmacological profiles of THC and these 3-substituent rimonabant analogues, the effects are mediated by distinct neural targets. Notably, these analogues are unlikely to possess marijuana-like abuse liability in humans, but general abuse liability has not yet been determined. Efforts to determine the mechanism(s) of action of this seemingly unique class of compounds are underway.

Analysis of Tolerance and Behavioral/Physical Dependence during Chronic CB1Agonist Treatment: Effects of CB1Agonists, Antagonists, and Noncannabinoid Drugs

Behavioral studies of chronic CB(1) receptor activation may provide a pharmacological approach to understanding efficacy-related differences among CB(1) ligands as well as mechanistic commonalities between cannabinoid and noncannabinoid drugs. In the present studies, the effects of CB(1) agonists [(6aR,10aR)-3-(1-adamantyl)-6,6,9-trimethyl-6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydrobenzo[c]chromen-1-ol (AM411), 9β-(hydroxymethyl)-3-(1-adamantyl)-hexahydrocannabinol (AM4054), R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazinyl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate (WIN55,212.2), Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC), (R)-(+)-arachidonyl-1'-hydroxy-2'-propylamide (methanandamide)], CB(1) antagonists [5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-N-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A), 5-(4-alkylphenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-N-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM4113)], and dopamine (DA)-related [methamphetamine, (±)-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide (SKF82958), (R)-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH23390), (6aR)-5,6,6a,7-tetrahydro-6-propyl-4H-dibenzo[de,g]quinoline-10,11-diol (R-(-)-NPA), haloperidol] and opioid (morphine, naltrexone) drugs on scheduled-controlled responding under a 30-response fixed ratio schedule of stimulus-shock termination in squirrel monkeys were compared before and during chronic treatment with the long-acting CB(1) agonist AM411 (1.0 mg/kg per day, i.m.). Prechronic treatment with all drugs except naltrexone (1-10 mg/kg) produced dose-related decreases in responses rates. Dose-response re-determinations during chronic treatment revealed the following: 1) >250-fold (AM411, methanandamide) and >45-fold (AM4054, WIN55,212.2, Δ(9)-THC) rightward shifts in the ED(50) values for CB(1) agonists; 2) >100-fold and >20-fold leftward shifts in the ED(50) values for SR141716A and AM4113, respectively; and 3) approximately 4.8-fold and 10-fold rightward shifts in the ED(50) values for methamphetamine and the DA D(2) agonist R-(-)-NPA, respectively. Dose-response relationships for other DA-related and opioid drugs were unchanged by chronic CB(1) agonist treatment. Differences in the magnitude of tolerance among CB(1) agonists during chronic treatment may be indicative of differences in their pharmacological efficacy, whereas the enhanced sensitivity to behaviorally disruptive effects of CB(1) antagonists may provide evidence for CB(1)-related behavioral and/or physical dependence. Finally, the development of cross-tolerance to methamphetamine and R-(-)-NPA bolsters previous evidence of interplay between CB(1) and DA D(2) signaling mechanisms.

Cross-tolerance development to the prolongation of pentobarbitone-induced sleep by delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-hydroxy-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice.

Repeated administration (5 mg kg-1 day-1 i.v.) of delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol and its active metabolite, 11-hydroxy-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol caused tolerance to develop to their prolonging effect on pentobarbitone-induced sleep in mice. Reciprocal cross-tolerance also developed after seven daily doses of these cannabinoids. The magnitude of the tolerance developed by the metabolite was greater than that by delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol. The results suggest that 11-hydroxy-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol plays an important role both in the sleep-prolonging effect of delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol and its tolerance development.

Differential cross-tolerance development between single and repeated immobilization stress on the antinociceptive effect induced by β-endorphin, 5-hydroxytryptamine, morphine, and WIN55,212-2 in the inflammatory mouse pain mode

We have evaluated the possible underlying mechanisms of immobilization stress-induced analgesia (SIA) by behavioral cross-tolerance studies and molecular studies. In the behavioral studies, the cross-tolerance between single or repeated immobilization SIA and the antinociceptive effects of β-endorphin, morphine, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), or WIN55,212-2 were assessed. Both single and repeated (×7) immobilization stress significantly attenuated the β-endorphin and 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced antinociception in the 2nd phase of formalin response, respectively. However, these cross-tolerances disappeared in prolonged repetition of the stress (×14). Neither single nor repeated (×7 and ×14) immobilization stress affected the antinociceptive effect of morphine or WIN55,212-2 at all. We also found that immobilization stress activated hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene and β-endorphin expression. Since, it has potent inhibitory activity on the noxious stimuli-induced POMC expression, immobilization stress seemed to dissipate the POMC gene expression process. Meanwhile, we did not find any changes in the opioid receptors' (mu-, delta- and kappa-receptor) and the cannabinoid receptors' (CB1 and CB2) expressions in the midbrain regions elicited by single or repeated stress. These results suggested that a single immobilization stress activates the descending pain modulatory system, which is mainly mediated through endorphinergic and serotonergic activation. Moreover, the tolerance of SIA induced by repeated stresses may be due to the prolonged activation of these systems induced by repeated immobilization.

Role of mouse cerebellar nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α4β2- and α7 subtypes in the behavioral cross-tolerance between nicotine and ethanol-induced ataxia

We have demonstrated that nicotine attenuated ethanol-induced ataxia via nicotinic-acetylcholine-receptor (nAChR) subtypes α4β2 and α7. In the present study, ethanol (2g/kg; i.p.)-induced ataxia was assessed by Rotorod performance following repeated intracerebellar infusion of α4β2- and α7-selective agonists. Localization of α4β2 and α7 nAChRs was confirmed immunohistochemically. Cerebellar NOx (nitrite+nitrate) was determined flurometrically. Repeated intracerebellar microinfusion of the α4β2-selective agonist, RJR-2403 (for 1, 2, 3, 5 or 7 days) or the α7-selective agonist, PNU-282987 (1, 2, 3 or 5 days), dose-dependently attenuated ethanol-induced ataxia. These results suggest the development of cross-tolerance between ethanol-induced ataxia and α4β2 and α7 nAChR agonists. With RJR-2403, the cross-tolerance was maximal after a 5-day treatment and lasted 48h. Cross-tolerance was maximal after a 1-day treatment with PNU-282987 and lasted 72h. Pretreatment with α4β2- and α7-selective antagonists, dihydro-β-erythroidine and methyllycaconitine, respectively, prevented the development of cross-tolerance confirming α4β2 and α7 involvement. Repeated agonist infusions elevated cerebellar NOx 16h after the last treatment while acute ethanol exposure decreased it. Pretreatment with repeated RJR-2403 or PNU-282987 reversed ethanol-induced decrease in NOx. The NOx data suggests the involvement of the nitric oxide (NO)–cGMP signaling pathway in the cross-tolerance that develops between α4β2- and α7-selective agonists and ethanol ataxia. Both α4β2 and α7 subtypes exhibited high immunoreactivity in Purkinje but sparse expression in molecular and granular cell layers. Our results support a role for α4β2 and α7 nAChR subtypes in the development of cross-tolerance between nicotine and ethanol with the NO signaling pathway as a potential mechanism.

Selective changes in sensitivity to benzodiazepines, and not other positive GABAA modulators, in rats receiving flunitrazepam chronically

Tolerance and dependence can develop during chronic benzodiazepine treatment; however, cross tolerance and cross dependence to positive modulators acting at other sites on GABA(A) receptors might not occur. The current study evaluated changes in sensitivity to positive GABA(A) modulators during chronic treatment with the benzodiazepine flunitrazepam to determine whether cross tolerance and cross dependence varied as a function of site of action. Eight rats responded under a fixed ratio 20 schedule of food presentation. Dose-effect curves were determined before, during and after chronic treatment with one or two daily injections of 1 mg/kg of flunitrazepam. Prior to chronic treatment, benzodiazepines (flunitrazepam, midazolam), a barbiturate (pentobarbital), a neuroactive steroid (pregnanolone), and drugs with primary mechanisms of action at receptors other than GABA(A) receptors (morphine, ketamine) dose-dependently decreased responding. Twice daily treatment with flunitrazepam produced 9.5- and 23-fold shifts to the right in the flunitrazepam and midazolam dose-effect curves, respectively. In contrast, dose-effect curves for other drugs either were not changed or were shifted less than or equal to fourfold to the right. Decreased sensitivity to benzodiazepines and not to a barbiturate or a neuroactive steroid during chronic flunitrazepam treatment indicates that tolerance and cross tolerance developed only to benzodiazepines. Despite similar acute behavioral effects among positive GABA(A) modulators, the differential development of cross tolerance suggests that adaptations at GABA(A) receptors produced by chronic benzodiazepine treatment differentially affect positive modulators depending on their site of action; such differences might be exploited to benefit patients treated daily with positive GABA(A) modulators.

Lack of tolerance and morphine-induced cross-tolerance to the analgesia of chimeric peptide of Met-enkephalin and FMRFa

Chimeric peptide of Met-enkephalin and FMRFa (YGGFMKKKFMRFa-YFa), a κ-opioid receptor specific peptide, did not induce tolerance and cross-tolerance effects to its analgesic action on day 5 after pretreatment with either YFa or morphine for 4 days. However, pretreatment with YFa for 4 days led to the development of cross-tolerance to the analgesic effects of morphine and also 4 days of pretreatment of morphine resulted in the expression of tolerance to its own analgesic effects. Similar expression of tolerance and cross-tolerance were also observed when YFa was compared with the κ receptor agonist peptide dynorphin A(1–13) [DynA(1–13)]. Cross-tolerance effects between YFa and DynA(1–13) analgesia were also not observed on day 5. Interestingly, when YFa and DynA(1–13) were tested for their analgesic effects for 5 days, reduction in analgesia on day 3 was observed in case of DynA(1–13) whereas YFa maintained its analgesia for 5 days. Thus, chimeric peptide YFa may serve as a useful probe to understand pain modulation and expression of tolerance and cross-tolerance behavior with other opioids.

Behavioral Cross-Tolerance between Repeated Intracerebellar Nicotine and Acute Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-Induced Cerebellar Ataxia: Role of Cerebellar Nitric Oxide

We have previously demonstrated that acute intracerebellar nicotine or N-methyl-4-(3-pyridinyl)-3-buten-1-amine (RJR-2403), a selective alpha(4)beta(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist, dose dependently attenuates Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)THC)-induced ataxia. Presently, we have shown that intracerebellar nicotine (1.25, 2.5, and 5 ng; once daily for 5 days) and RJR-2403 (250, 500, and 750 ng; once daily for 5 days) significantly attenuate cerebellar Delta(9)-THC-induced ataxia dose dependently, suggesting the development of cross-tolerance between nicotine or RJR-2403 with Delta(9)-THC in male CD-1 mice. Intracerebellar RJR-2403 (750 ng) microinfused for 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days (once daily) significantly attenuated Delta(9)-THC-induced ataxia in the 3-, 5-, and 7-day treatment groups; optimal cross-tolerance was evident at day 5 and persisted till 36 h after the last RJR-2403 microinfusion. Intracerebellar microinfusion of hexamethonium (nAChR antagonist; 1 microg) or dihydro-beta-erythroidine hydrobromide (alpha(4)beta(2) nAChR antagonist; 500 ng) for 5 days 10 min before daily intracerebellar nicotine or RJR-2403 microinfusion virtually abolished cross-tolerance between nicotine or RJR-2403 and Delta(9)-THC, indicating nAChR participation. In addition, microinfusion of antagonists 10 min after daily intracerebellar nicotine or RJR-2403 failed to alter the cross-tolerance, suggesting possible involvement of downstream cerebellar second-messenger mechanisms. Finally, the cerebellar concentration of nitric oxide products [total sum of nitrite + nitrate (NO(x))] was increased after 5 days of intracerebellar nicotine or RJR-2403 treatment, which was decreased by acute intracerebellar Delta(9)-THC treatment. The "nicotine or RJR-2403 + Delta(9)-THC" treatments significantly increased cerebellar NO(x) levels compared with treatment with Delta(9)-THC alone, supporting a functional correlation between cerebellar nitric oxide production and cerebellar Delta(9)-THC-induced ataxia and suggesting participation of nitric oxide in the observed cross-tolerance between nicotine/RJR-2403 and Delta(9)-THC.

Persistent exercise attenuates nicotine- but not clonidine-induced antinociception in female rats

Exercise decreases the antinociceptive effects of opiate drugs. It has been hypothesized that the exercise-induced attenuation of opiate drug action is the result of the development of cross-tolerance between endogenous opioids released during exercise and exogenous opiates. The present study was designed to evaluate the role of exercise on non-opiate antinociception. Female Long–Evans rats were allowed ad lib access to running wheels. After 3 weeks, antinociceptive responses of animals were measured using the tail flick test following the administration of clonidine or nicotine. Nicotine and clonidine both produced dose-dependent increases in antinociceptive responses. Active animals were significantly less sensitive to nicotine-induced antinociception than inactive animals. There was no difference between the two groups in clonidine-induced antinociception. The results of these experiments suggest that exercise does not attenuate non-opioid, clonidine-induced antinociception. However, exercise does attenuate nicotine-induced antinociception. Therefore, the effect of persistent exercise on analgesic drugs is not specific to opiates.

Chronic exercise decreases sensitivity to mu opioids in female rats: Correlation with exercise output

Aerobic exercise stimulates the release of endogenous opioid peptides and increases nociceptive (i.e., pain) threshold in a naloxone-reversible manner. During chronic exercise, sensitivity to the antinociceptive effects of morphine and other mu opioids decreases, leading some investigators to propose that exercise may lead to the development of cross-tolerance to exogenously administered opioid agonists. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of chronic exercise on sensitivity to mu opioids, and to determine if changes in opioid sensitivity during chronic exercise are correlated with exercise output. Eight female rats were obtained at weaning and housed in standard laboratory cages that did not permit any exercise beyond normal cage ambulation. Following 6 weeks under these conditions, opioids possessing a range of relative efficacies at the mu receptor (morphine, levorphanol, buprenorphine, butorphanol) were examined in a warm-water, tail-withdrawal procedure. Under sedentary conditions, all opioids produced dose-dependent increases in tail-withdrawal latencies, and high levels of antinociception were observed for all drugs. Following these tests, rats were reassigned to exercise conditions and transferred to cages equipped with running wheels. Under these conditions, rats ran an average of 7154 rev/day (7869 m/day), with a range across rats from 4501 to 10,164 rev/day (4951–11,180 m/day). Sensitivity to all four opioids decreased significantly during the exercise period, resulting in 2- to 5-fold decreases in the potency of morphine, levorphanol and buprenorphine, and decreases in the effectiveness of buprenorphine and butorphanol. When rats were returned to sedentary conditions, sensitivity to all four opioids increased significantly and returned to that observed prior to the exercise period. For all drugs, there was a positive correlation between exercise output and changes in opioid sensitivity between sedentary and exercise conditions. These data suggest that chronic exercise decreases sensitivity to mu opioids in female rats, and that these changes in sensitivity are positively correlated with exercise output.

Possible role of mouse cerebellar nitric oxide in the behavioral interaction between chronic intracerebellar nicotine and acute ethanol administration: Observation of cross-tolerance

Many studies have reported cross-tolerance between nicotine and ethanol. Previously we demonstrated that intracerebellar nicotine attenuates ethanol-induced motor impairment. In this study, intracerebellar nicotine (0.625, 2.5, 5 ng; once daily for five days) significantly attenuated ethanol-induced motor impairment in a dose-dependent fashion suggesting the development of cross-tolerance between nicotine and ethanol in male CD-1 mice. Using the same paradigm, intracerebellar nicotine (5 ng) microinfused for 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 days significantly attenuated ethanol-induced motor impairment in all groups except the 1-day treatment group. Cross-tolerance, which developed optimally in 5-day nicotine treatment group, was reversible and detectable up to 40 h post-nicotine microinfusion. Intracerebellar microinfusion of hexamethonium (1 μg once daily for 5 days): (i) did not alter ethanol-induced motor impairment indicating no tonic nicotine receptor involvement; (ii) 10 min prior to daily intracerebellar nicotine treatment virtually abolished the cross-tolerance between nicotine and ethanol indicating nicotinic acetylcholine receptor participation; (iii) when microinfused 10 min after daily intracerebellar nicotine treatment, failed to abolish the cross-tolerance which suggested possible participation of downstream second messenger mechanisms. Chronic intracerebellar microinfusion of nicotine: (i) failed to attenuate acute pentobarbital (25mg/kg i.p.)-induced motor impairment; and (ii) produced no change in normal motor coordination when followed by saline injection. Finally, the cerebellar concentration of total nitric oxide products (nitrite+nitrate; NO x); (i) was increased after 5-day intracerebellar nicotine; (ii) was decreased by acute ethanol administration; and (iii) decreased due to acute ethanol administration which was opposed by chronic intracerebellar nicotine treatment. These results support a functional correlation between the cerebellar nitric oxide production and ethanol-induced motor impairment and suggest possible participation of nitric oxide as a factor in the observed cross-tolerance between nicotine and ethanol.

On the mechanism of cross-tolerance between morphine- and nicotine-induced antinociception: Involvement of calcium channels

The present study focused on the evaluation of a mechanism of nicotine-induced antinociception and cross-tolerance to antinociceptive effects between nicotine and morphine in mice. The results indicate that, at a dose of 3 mg/kg, nicotine produced a significant antinociception in the hot-plate test. Additionally, the L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel antagonists, nimodipine, verapamil and diltiazem (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg), as well as an opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (0.5 and 1 mg/kg), dose-dependently attenuated this nicotine-induced antinociception. In a second series of experiments, mice were treated with morphine (25 and 50 mg/kg) once daily, for 3 days. On the 4th day, the antinociceptive response of morphine (10 mg/kg) and nicotine (3 mg/kg) was measured. Tolerance to the effects of both drugs was observed only in mice pretreated with the highest dose of morphine. Furthermore, the administration of nimodipine, diltiazem, flunarizine (10 and 20 mg/kg), but not of verapamil (10 and 20 mg/kg) nor mecamylamine (1 and 2 mg/kg) prior to morphine injections, prevented this cross-tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine and nicotine. These findings support the hypothesis that similar opioid- and calcium-dependent mechanisms are involved in morphine- and nicotine-induced antinociception and in the development of cross-tolerance between these drugs.