Magnetization transfer, a well-known technique in NMR ( 1) , has recently become of interest in magnetic resonance imaging. This is largely due to the discovery by Wolf and Balaban that a new form of tissue-specific contrast, which they refer to as magnetization-transfer contrast (MTC), can be generated with the technique (2). While the detailed mechanism for MTC is an area of active research, current consensus is that the contrast is generated through cross relaxation between protons in the mobile water and immobile protons in macromolecules (3). Magnetization transfer is usually observed by RF irradiation at an offset frequency which results in the partial saturation of immobile protons in macromolecules and minimal energy absorption by the mobile water. Subsequently, the cross relaxation between the mobile and immobile protons results in a reduction of the longitudinal magnetization 44, on the mobile water protons. Although For&n and Hofhnan (I ) and Mann (4) derived formulas relating the mobile water M, reduction to the crossrelaxation rate constant in the 1960s and 1970s respectively, their formulas do not describe the functional dependence of magnetization transfer on offset frequency and RF irradiation power. Experimental results indicate that the magnitude of the magnetization-transfer effect can be controlled by these factors (2). A theoretical understanding of the problem is of fundamental importance to applications of the technique and should be especially useful in MRI applications. Recently, Grad and Bryant derived an expression for the cross-relaxation spectroscopy lineshape, from which one can determine the effect of offset frequency and RF irradiation power on magnetization transfer (5). However, they employed a truncated set of the coupled Bloch equations, and their results are valid only if the transverse magnetization of mobile water spins is negligible. This assumption may not be met in MRI experiments where the offset frequency is relatively small or where the RF irradiation power is large. In these cases Grad and Bryant’s lineshape expression will overestimate the degree of magnetization transfer. In the present work, a complete set of coupled Bloch equations is used to obtain the cross-relaxation spectroscopy lineshape. The result is more general than Grad and Bryant’s and reduces to their expression when the transverse magnetization of mobile water spins is negligible. The coupled Bloch equations for two cross-relaxed spins (e.g., via the dipole-dipole coupling) are