Cross-disciplinary Research Project Research Articles

Navigating the labyrinth of RI through a practical application — A case study in a cross-disciplinary research project

Responsible Innovation (RI) aims to enable research and innovation to take a more systematic approach to anticipating potential risks and consequences of planned research/innovative outputs. The Anticipation, Reflection, Engagement and Action (AREA) framework provides a flexible mechanism for organisations and researchers to align research and innovation with societal values, needs and challenges. However, its actual application may prove challenging for practitioners. In this paper, we describe how the AREA framework has been embedded in an interdisciplinary research project in the UK over the period of 2019–2021 through dedicated monthly RI workshops. To gain insights from this practice, we have collected qualitative data from discussions throughout the project and performed a systematic analysis of the logging practice itself. We discuss benefits and challenges associated with embedding an RI framework within an interdisciplinary research team, and present recommendations for future adoption of the AREA framework in a cross-disciplinary research setting.

Team science criteria and processes for promotion and tenure of Health Science University Faculty.

Although team science has expanded with far-reaching benefits, universities generally have not established criteria to recognize its value in faculty promotion and tenure. This paper recommends how institutions might weigh a faculty member's engagement in team science in the promotion and tenure process. Seventeen team science promotion and tenure criteria are recommended based on four sources - an evaluation framework, effectiveness metrics, collaborative influences, and authorship criteria. Suggestions are made for adaptation of the 17 criteria to committee guidelines, faculty team science portfolios, and the roles of individuals and institutions participating in large, cross-disciplinary research projects. Future research recommendations are advanced.

Restorative fashion: Collaborative research, benign design and the healing powers of the mutuba tree

The potential of a radically Indigenous and endangered textile to improve human well-being and environmental health is the subject of an ongoing cross-disciplinary and multi-faceted research project between the United Kingdom and Uganda. This article presents the researchers’ findings to date on Ugandan barkcloth, produced from the mutuba tree and part of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. Methods included fieldwork in Uganda, natural dye experiments, testing a biodesign strategy, textile laboratory testing and scientific laboratory testing of the unique antimicrobial properties of barkcloth. Although beginning with artistic, practice-based research, the group uncovers important knowledge that may provide significant medical science benefits. They identify the central role of the mutuba tree in restorative and agroforestry systems; create natural dyes that may confer barkcloth’s properties to other materials. Thus demonstrating barkcloth production as a truly slow fashion textile and well-making system that promotes the well-being of people and planet in multiple ways.

Methodological and Informational Support for Designing the «Philologist Automated Workplace» as an Element of Academic Ecosystem for Launching and Implementing Cross-Disciplinary Research Projects at the Interface of Social and Technical Sciences

A series of processes leading to dramatic changes in all aspects of our lives are ushering in the fourth industrial revolution, the foundation of which is the development of fast-growing digital technologies. Among these are big data, blockchain, artificial intelligence and neural networks, and the Internet of Things (IoT). In order to have an understanding of digital processes and their social effect, it is necessary to describe social systems and social sectors of the economy in new terms and through a new understanding of the impact of the technologies of the fourth industrial revolution. One element of such a description is the problem of developing and transforming an academic ecosystem to launch and implement interdisciplinary research projects at the intersection of the social and technical sciences. This article presents the results of methodological and informational support of designing the «Philologist Automated Workplace» as an element of academic ecosystem for launching and implementing interdisciplinary research projects at the intersection of socio-humanities and technical sciences, and formulates the following methodological recommendations for designing the concept of «Philologist Automated Workplace».

Establishing an Information Model for the «Philologist Automated Workplace» Concept for Launching and Implementing Cross-Disciplinary Research Projects at the Interface of Socio-Humanitarian and Technical Science

A series of processes leading to dramatic changes in all aspects of our lives are ushering in the fourth industrial revolution, the foundation of which is the development of fast-growing digital technologies. Among these are big data, blockchain, artificial intelligence and neural networks, and the Internet of Things (IoT). In order to have an understanding of digital processes and their social effect, it is necessary to describe social systems and social sectors of the economy in new terms and through a new understanding of the impact of the technologies of the fourth industrial revolution. One element of such a description is the problem of developing and transforming an academic ecosystem to launch and implement interdisciplinary projects at the intersection of the social and technical sciences. That is why we have developed the concept of the "Philologist Automated Workplace" as an element of the academic ecosystem for launching and implementing interdisciplinary research projects at the intersection of social and technical sciences.

Envisioning in participatory design processes for civic sense-making

Participatory design (PD) has been considerably broadening the gaze of the design discipline. This produced a huge impact on design processes, boosting the academic dialogue and engaging institutions as well as diverse forms of publics in give together form to the public sphere. Participatory processes can play an important role in reframing issues and reconfiguring behaviours in the common realm, opening the social imagination to boost citizenship awareness. In this paper, the authors investigate the potential role of narratives for PD activities as a key to interpret the cultural heritage and the social ecosystem of an urban settlement. They do so by supporting the development of a diffused capability of envisioning both a better present as well as a better future with and for citizens, leveraging design’s down-to-earth capacity to foresee possibilities for change. The potential of narratives for PD practices is investigated here by means of a situated and cross-disciplinary research project for the city of Ivrea (Italy), which served both to contextualise new ideas as well as to develop new techniques, pursuing the hybridisation of PD processes with storytelling and design fiction, and developing tools borrowed from science fiction, spatial design and narratology.

Language education professionals in multilingual ECEC institutions – Sprach-bildungsprofis in mehrsprachigen Kitas

AbstractThe cross-disciplinary research project ‘SprabiPiKs’ (‘Sprachbildungsprofis in mehrsprachigen Kitas’) – ‘Language education professionals in multilingual ECEC institutions’ – investigates a number of components related to the quality of interactions in multilingual early childhood education and care (ECEC). The project closely examines the interplay between the quality of interactions and pedagogical orientations on multilingualism, competencies of the professionals, and the conditions in ECEC facilities as well as in their neighbourhoods. To address the complexity, the sample consists of six childcare centres and their professionals. The project’s data collection method consists of interviews and group discussions with the professionals, videography of verbal interactions, and questionnaires on the conditions in the facilities and the neighbourhood. The objective is to contribute significantly to the understanding of the complex quality pattern in ECEC institutions from both an intercultural-educational and a linguistic perspective. Moreover, the project’s findings can be informative to enhance the quality of interactions with respect to the diverse linguistic backgrounds of children.

Blickar och betydelser

During the years 1795–1866 the Swedish national art collection, today’s Nationalmuseum, was on display at the Royal Palace in Stockholm at what was known as Kongl. Museum. This museum consisted of two sculpture galleries adjacent to the palace garden Logården and a paintings gallery and a few more rooms on the second floor. While the sculpture galleries are well known as well as reconstructed in situ, there has been much less research on the display of paintings at the museum. In the cross disciplinary research project »Virtual Museum at the Royal Palace» we are using a digital 3D model to reconstruct the display of paintings in the so-called smaller gallery of the palace, as it was displayed during the period. The reconstruction deals with two different hangings of the gallery, in 1795 and c. 1843, made by the curators Carl Fredric Fredenheim and Lars Jacob von Röök respectively. Our preliminary findings show that, contrary to earlier claims, the two hangings are rather different and constructed on quite different ideologies of museum display, something that is possible to see thanks to the method of using digital 3D-models as a basis for analysis.

Designing Collaborative Research: The Exploration of Common Purposes to Foster the Generation of Cross-Disciplinary Projects

AbstractDespite the increasing demand to develop cross-disciplinary research projects, designing collaborative research still prove to be difficult due to both scientific specialization and organizational issues. In this paper, we explore how innovative design dynamics can be developed between researchers to collectively build research projects that could become common purposes for collaboration. This work relies on a case study led with the newly formed Eco&Phy research team, who applied an innovative design process to initiate collaboration and design its scientific agenda for the next 5 years. This process was built based on both KCP and matching-building methodologies: it included an initialization phase, during which the team strategically chose topics to be explored, and exploration phases, during which researchers collectively developed new knowledge and concepts to build cross-disciplinary projects. At the end of the design process, the team had developed two new research lines that were integrated in its official agenda. In conclusion, the article discusses the relevance of design approaches to develop original collaborative research through dedicated innovation processes.

Patent-Bot

Patent-Bot is an artificial intelligence (AI) software program that learns language from the patent database to write original patents for submission to the United States Patent Office (USPTO). The program creates thousands of new patent summaries per second. Patent-Bot is itself a piece of intellectual property, which in turn exists to generate more intellectual property. Patent-Bot also invents new words in relation to its future concepts, which appear to test the current linguistic limits of innovation and communication. Patent-Bot was debuted as an interactive art installation in the Omnibus Filing exhibition at the Visual Arts Center, University of Texas at Austin. Omnibus Filing showcased artworks, inventions, prototypes and cross-disciplinary research projects undertaken by teams of scientists, artists and engineers. Patent-Bot has since exhibited at Piksel 17: A festival for Elektronisk Kunst og fri Teknologi, in Lydgalleriet, Bergen, Norway. The project is an ongoing collaboration between the authors spanning a variety of exhibition formats and modes of display.

A Collaborative Multidisciplinary and Without-Walls Research Curriculum in Global Health.

Longitudinal and collaborative global health research curricula to train a well-versed global health corps through skills building in assessment and evaluation are lacking. A without-walls research curriculum was offered to medical and public health students between 2007 and 2015. Mentored cross-disciplinary research projects were developed and implemented in partnership with communities. A multilevel mixed methods design, including semi-structured interviews, post-curriculum surveys, presentations, publications, postgraduation metrics, and feedback from project sites, evaluated educational outcomes. Students (N = 25; aged 27 ± 1.9 years; 90.5% female) participated in the studies in 12 countries, resulting in 26 national-level presentations and 24 peer-reviewed publications, including per student average and range of Institutional Review Board submission (0.95; 0-3), poster presentation (0.85; 0-3), oral presentation (0.65; 0-2), and peer-reviewed submission (1.05; 0-4). On average, the studies (40% mixed methods) lasted 2 years. Analyses and manuscript writing were the most challenging; data collection and presentations were the most rewarding. Majority of the participants strongly agreed with achieving skills in community engagement, interviewing techniques, research design and implementation, research dissemination, and career development. Interview themes included expectations and learning goals, effective mentorship, impact on career goals, and ethical learning. Mentorship qualities were accessibility, real-time problem solving, research expertise, advocate, and balancing guidance with independence. Project sites' feedback was overwhelmingly positive regarding the projects' impact. Postgraduation participants hold positions in humanitarian organizations, research programs serving the underserved, and primary care residencies, fellowships, and faculty. This experience illustrates the feasibility and effectiveness of mentored global health research and underlines the crucial link between community collaboration and scholarship for effective global health practice.

Situative Interdisciplinarity: Empirical Reflections on Ten Years of Cross-Disciplinary Research

Abstract Given the current call for interdisciplinarity, we reflect on pragmatic methodological implementations of collaborative research – by drawing on empirical evidence from two large-scale cross-disciplinary research projects and by theoretically framing them in trilingual contexts (German, French, and English). These are two major innovations compared to the existing body of literature in this domain. Our empirical analysis shows that multi-, inter- or trans-disciplinary collaboration is an oscillating process along a spectrum of cross-disciplinarity – spanning additive, converging and synthesizing work patterns, i.e. multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinarity. Such an umbrella-term avoids the common amalgamation of ‘interdisciplinarity’ as the overarching category (cross-disciplinarity of whatever form) and one of the relevant subcategories (the specific work form that a research team chooses). Concretely, if the majority of methods are developed through communal negotiation processes, then a truly interdisciplinary analysis of research results can only be guaranteed through recursive self-reflexive loops. Initial research questions may still be additive and interactions can oscillate during the project process between addition und tentative convergence. We label this process situative interdisciplinarity. Multi-, inter- and transdisciplinarity are thus subsumed as a processual entity: flexible, possibly hybrid subforms of cross-disciplinarity. It needs constant reactivation, framing, timing and mediation by project managers. The major challenge lies in the collaborative transfer of concepts, theories, methods and research subjects. This transfer requires translation, explication and transposition of the various disciplinary ‘languages’ and can only be converged in an open-minded, team-oriented and reflexive work environment.

Using design theory to foster innovative cross-disciplinary research: Lessons learned from a research network focused on antimicrobial use and animal microbes’ resistance to antimicrobials

Dealing with the major societal and research challenges related to antimicrobial use will require cross-disciplinary research and strong relationships between researchers and stakeholders. Design theories, such as the concept-knowledge (C-K) theory, can help spur the emergence of innovation. Here, our objective was to examine how the C-K theory could promote the development of novel, cross-disciplinary research projects on antimicrobial use and animal microbes’ resistance to antimicrobials. A French research network (R2A2; Réseau Recherche Antibiotiques Animal) was created whose goal was to foster cross-disciplinary research and scientific discussion on these topics. The R2A2 network hosted general meetings and thematic workshops, during which participants brainstormed using C-K diagrams. The network's performance was evaluated through the evolution of C-K diagrams, project creation, and participant interviews. R2A2 led to the creation of a minimum of eight research projects. The participants felt network events facilitated interactions and collaborations with researchers in different disciplines. The R2A2 network has opened new avenues of research into several important topics: antimicrobial use on farms, the environmental impacts of antimicrobials, animal immunity, and alternative treatments. The keys to its success were: (i) participant interest; (ii) the use of C-K design theory to encourage cross-disciplinary thinking; (iii) the aim of fostering several small projects rather than one large project; and (iv) network responsiveness to participant needs with regards to meeting and workshop topics. C-K theory served a key role in promoting cross-disciplinary thinking on topics at the interface between research and stakeholder interests.

A Thematic Analysis of Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management (IJIKM)

Aim/Purpose: This study investigates the research profile of the papers published in Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management (IJIKM) to provide silhouette information of the journal for the editorial team, researchers, and the audience of the journal. Background: Information and knowledge management is an interdisciplinary subject. IJIKM defines intersections of multiple disciplinary research communities for the interdisciplinary subject. Methodology: A quantitative study of categorical content analysis was used for a thematic analysis of IJIKM. One hundred fifty nine (159) papers published since the inauguration of the journal in 2006 were coded and analyzed. Contribution: The study provides synopsized information about the interdisciplinary research profile of IJIKM, and adds value to the literature of information and knowledge management. Findings: The analysis reveals that IJIKM disseminates research papers with a wide range of research themes. Among the research themes, Organizational issues of knowledge/information management, Knowledge management systems/tools, Information/knowledge sharing, Technology for knowledge/information management, Information/knowledge application represent the five main research streams of IJIKM. The total number of papers on organizational issues of knowledge/information management increased from 16% to 28% during the past 6 years. Statistical method was the most common research methodology, and summarization was the most common research design applied in the papers of IJIKM. The paper also presents other patterns of participant countries, keywords frequencies, and reference citations. Recommendations for Practitioners: Innovation is the key to information and knowledge management. Practitioners of information and knowledge management can share best practices with external sectors. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers can identify opportunities of cross-disciplinary research projects that involve experts in business, education, government, healthcare, technology, and psychology to advance knowledge in information and knowledge management. Impact on Society: Information and knowledge management is still a developing field, and readers of this paper can gain more understanding of the dissemination of the literature of information and knowledge management involved in all relevant disciplines. Future Research: A longitudinal study could follow up in the future to provide updated and comparative information of the research profile of the journal.

Organization studies of inequality, with and beyond Piketty

Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century did much to bring discussions of economic inequality into the intellectual and popular mainstream. This article indicates how business, management and organization studies can productively engage with Piketty’s book. It does this by deriving practical consequences from Piketty’s proposed division of intellectual labour in general and his account of ‘super-managers’ in particular. There are organizational specificities to inequality which Piketty’s framework does not address, however. His account of corporate governance, of tax avoidance policy and of financialization, in particular, requires significant conceptual and empirical supplementation. We argue that business, management and organizational scholars should contribute to the cross-disciplinary inequality research project which Capital in the 21st Century proposes not despite these limitations but because of them.

How mechanisms explain interfield cooperation: biological-chemical study of plant growth hormones in Utrecht and Pasadena, 1930-1938.

This article examines to what extent a particular case of cross-disciplinary research in the 1930s was structured by mechanistic reasoning. For this purpose, it identifies the interfield theories that allowed biologists and chemists to use each other's techniques and findings, and that provided the basis for the experiments performed to identify plant growth hormones and to learn more about their role in the mechanism of plant growth. In 1930, chemists and biologists in Utrecht and Pasadena began to cooperatively study plant growth. I will argue that these researchers decided to join forces because they believed to rely on each other's findings and methods to solve their research problems adequately. In the course of the cooperation, organic chemists arrived at isolating plant growth hormones by using a test method developed in plant physiology. This achievement, in turn, facilitated biologists' investigation of the mechanism of plant growth. Researchers eventually believed to have the means to study the relation between a substance's molecular structure and its physiological activity. The way they conceptualized the problem of identifying hormones and unraveling the mechanism of plant growth, as well as their actual research actions are compatible with the new mechanists' account of mechanism research. The study illustrates that focusing on researchers' mechanistic reasoning can contribute considerably to explaining the structure of cross-disciplinary research projects.

Management of a Complex Research Project in the Context of Implementing the University's Overall Strategy

Abstract The aim of the paper is to discuss the central issues associated with the implementation of a multidimensional research project in a university from a strategic management point of view. In the paper, it is argued that project management plays an important role in executing institutional strategy aimed at achieving research and academic excellence. The analysis provided in this paper is based on the academic literature review on some important strategic and project management concerns; it is also based on the author's experience as the leader of an international research project executed in Transport and Telecommunication Institute (Latvia) under the ERASMUS+ programme. The analysis performed in this paper allows the author to conclude that the challenges of managing a cross-disciplinary research project increase when the context is related to the complicated environment of a contemporary university. Within complex university settings, different inter-related strategies come into play for accomplishing competitive advantage of an educational organization, multidimensional research projects making their valuable contribution to achieving the university's strategic goals.

SEAmester – South Africa’s first class afloat

The Department of Science and Technology's (DST's) 10-year Global Change Grand Challenge programme requires platforms to 'attract young researchers to the region and retain them by exciting their interest in aspects of global change; while developing their capacity and professional skills in the relevant fields of investigation'. In addition, in July 2014, President Zuma officially launched Operation Phakisa and announced that a key target of this Oceans Economy initiative would be 'for the Department of Higher Education and Training to drive alignment between theoretical and workplace learning'. SEAmester - South Africa's recently established Class Afloat - achieves just that. SEAmester introduces marine science as an applied and cross-disciplinary field to students who have shown an affinity for core science disciplines. It identifies with government's National Development Plan on education, training and innovation - critical to South Africa's long-term development and investment in this sector. SEAmester has a long-term vision aimed at building capacity within the marine sciences by coordinating and fostering cross-disciplinary research projects and achieving this goal through a highly innovative programme. The strength of SEAmester is that postgraduate students combine theoretical classroom learning with the application of this knowledge through ship-based, and more importantly, hands-on research. The state-of-the-art research vessel, SA Agulhas II, provides an ideal teaching and research platform for this programme; its size, comfort and shipboard facilities allow large groups of students and lecturers to productively interact over a period of 10 days.

Managing a Cross-Disciplinary Research Project in a University: The Case of LEARNIT

Managing a Cross-Disciplinary Research Project in a University: The Case of LEARNIT

Strength in Numbers: A Model for Undergraduate Research Training and Education in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

This study describes a new approach to undergraduate science training that offers an alternate model to the national objective of scaling up scientific research interests and capabilities among undergraduate students. With this new focus, we seek to more effectively bring scientific research methods and experiences to larger numbers of students in non-elite educational circumstances. Our model has been designed and implemented, at the John Jay College and the Borough of Manhattan Community College, both of which are part of the City University of New York (CUNY), where we have a majority non-White and economically disadvantaged student body. We have successfully engaged large numbers of undergraduate students by linking multiple classes in the social and behavioral sciences to build collective cross-disciplinary research projects that give every enrolled student an opportunity to receive high-quality research training and create cumulative data sets over years that are cumulative, collaborative, and of professional value.