Critical Care Pharmacists Research Articles

The roles and patterns of critical care pharmacists: a literature review and practical operation model in China

Drug-related problems (DRPs) are prevalent in critically ill patients and may significantly increase mortality risks. The participation of critical care pharmacists (CCPs) in the medical team has demonstrated a benefit to healthcare quality. Research indicates that CCP medication order evaluations can reduce DRPs, while their participation in rounds can reduce adverse drug events and shorten hospital stays. Pharmacist medication reconciliation often proves more effective than physicians, and CCPs play a crucial role in antimicrobial management and reducing treatment costs. Despite these benefits, there is a noticeable lack of practical guidance for implementing CCP roles effectively. Their workflow heavily influences the efficiency of CCPs. Integrating results from the literature with our practical experience, we have detailed workflows and critical entry points that CCPs can refer to. Pharmacists should be proactive rather than passive consultants. Pre-round medication order evaluations are crucial for determining the depth of a pharmacist’s involvement in patient care. These evaluations should cover the following aspects: medication indication, dosage, treatment duration, detection of DRPs, implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring, dosing of sedatives and analgesics, and pharmaceutical cost containment. Beyond identifying medication issues, a primary task during rounds is gathering additional information and building trust with the medical team. Post-round responsibilities for CCPs include patient and caregiver education on medication, medication reconciliation for transitioning patients, and follow-up care for post-ICU patients. Establishing a rationalized and standardized workflow is essential to minimize daily work omissions and maximize the pharmacist’s value. A multidisciplinary pharmacist-led team can significantly promote the rational use of antibiotics. Participation in post-ICU outpatient follow-ups can reduce drug-induced injuries after discharge. This review provides a detailed overview of the tasks performed by CCPs before, during, and after medical rounds, serving as a valuable reference for establishing an efficient workflow for CCPs.

EXaminaTion of cRitical cAre PHArmacist pRoductivity MetricS (EXTRA‐PHARMS): The clinical pharmacist's perspective

AbstractBackgroundCritical care pharmacists are well‐established, valuable members of the intensive care unit interprofessional team with unique skills to perform comprehensive medication management in complex critically ill patients. However, standardized and consequential productivity metrics for critical care pharmacists have not been established.ObjectiveTo characterize the utilization and perception of contemporary critical care pharmacy productivity metrics utilized among individual institutions.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsAn electronic survey was distributed to critical care pharmacist members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Section and the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Critical Care Practice and Research Network.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe survey included 23 questions to assess institution demographics, individual respondent demographics, institution practices, and individual respondent perceptions about the value of critical care pharmacist productivity metrics.ResultsA total of 204 critical care pharmacists, largely from the United States, responded to the survey between July and November 2022. Institutional metrics captured by more than 50% of the respondents' institutions included order verification rate/number of orders verified (60%), number of clinical interventions (57%), and intravenous to enteral product interchanges (52%). Of these metrics, critical care pharmacists only agreed with the value of the number of clinical interventions, were indifferent to the value of intravenous to oral product interchanges, and disagreed with the value of order verification rate/number of orders verified.ConclusionsSignificant discrepancies exist between institutional productivity metric practices and their perceived value and utility among critical care pharmacists.

Effects of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention in a Saudi ICU: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study

Given their contributions to better patient outcomes, medication safety, and lower drug cost, critical care pharmacists are especially prepared to play a major role within the critical care interdisciplinary team in managing the therapeutic element. Consequently, this research set out to evaluate the ICU clinical pharmacist interventions' frequency, kind, and effect, as well as the acceptability of these interventions by the doctors who provide them. The research was prospective and cross-sectional in nature. Over the course of six months, from April 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023, data was collected daily from a minimum of 380 interventions. This research covered all patients hospitalized to the intensive care unit at Saudi Arabia throughout the specified time frame. Over the duration of the 6-month trial, 120 patients had a total of 500 interventions. Of these, 490 (98%) had physician approval for clinical pharmacist treatments. The majority of the recommendations (34.8%, or 174 out of 500) were related to safety concerns; among these, 48.27%, or 48 out of 174, were for medication cessation owing to extended duration, while 30.46%, or 53 out of 174, were for renal dosage modification. Coming up as a close second, another therapeutic intervention involving indication made up 22.8% (114/500). A total of 124 interventions, or 24.8 percent of the total, had some kind of cost-related component, according to the study's findings on cost-saving treatments. The results of this research showed that clinical pharmacists have the potential to improve quality treatment for critically ill patients and lower healthcare expenditures. Furthermore, it provides helpful information on the incorporation of clinical pharmacists in intensive care units, particularly in areas with limited resources.

Sensemaking through crisis: critical care pharmacist (CCP) leadership during COVID-19

Purpose The purpose of this study is to understand how critical care pharmacists (CCPs) coped during the COVID-19 crisis by investigating what sense-making and leadership processes were evident during the crisis. Design/methodology/approach Data from ten semi-structured interviews of lead CCPs across different National Health Service organisations in the UK was analysed through a thematic process. Findings The findings identified that strong pre-existing relationships and high levels of trust play a significant role in successfully navigating a crisis. Four sense-making processes seem important to building and maintaining these relationships and trust, namely, identifying cues for change; authoring and labelling; interpretation and storytelling; negotiation and deliberation. Originality/value The research also highlights the need for organisations to acknowledge the leadership roles undertaken by CCP teams and leverage this role by investing in leadership training, thereby increasing resilience and preparedness for future storms or crises on the horizon.

Effect of Inpatient Pharmacist-Led Medication Reconciliations on Medication-Related Interventions in Intensive Care Unit Recovery Centers.

Background: Critical care pharmacists complete comprehensive medication reviews in Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) patients at Intensive Care Unit Recovery Centers (ICU-RCs) to optimize medication therapies after hospital discharge. Inpatient pharmacists often complete medication reconciliations prior to hospital discharge, which could affect interventions at an ICU-RC. However, this association remains ill-described. Objective: The purpose of this study was to, in patients with PICS, describe the effect of an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on the number of clinical pharmacist interventions at the first ICU-RC visit. Methods: This was a post-hoc subgroup analysis of an international, multicenter cohort study of adults who had a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication reconciliation conducted in 12 ICU-RCs. Only patients' first ICU-RC visit was eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the number of medication interventions made at initial ICU-RC visit in PICS patients who had an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation compared to those who did not. Results: Of 323 patients included, 83 received inpatient medication reconciliations and 240 did not. No difference was observed in the median number of medication interventions between groups (2 vs 2, p = .06). However, a higher incidence of any intervention (86.3% vs 78.3%, p = .09) and dose adjustment (20.4% vs 9.6%; p = .03) was observed in the no medication reconciliation group. Only ICU Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was associated with an increased odds of medication intervention at ICU-RC visit (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.25, p < .01). Conclusion and Relevance: No difference in the total number of medication interventions made by ICU-RC clinical pharmacists was observed in patients who received an inpatient, pharmacist-led medication reconciliation before hospital discharge compared to those who did not. Still, clinical observations within this study highlight the continued importance and study of clinical pharmacist involvement during transitions of care, including ICU-RC visits.

Mapping the next steps for critical care pharmacists.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Critical care pharmacist perspectives on optimal practice models and prioritization of professional activities: A cross-sectional survey

Abstract Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) are essential members of the multidisciplinary critical care team. Professional activities of the CCP are outlined in a 2020 position paper on critical care pharmacy services. This study looks to characterize CCP perspectives for priorities in optimizing pharmacy practice models and professional activities. Methods This was a cross-sectional survey conducted from July 24 to September 20, 2023. A 41-question survey instrument was developed to assess 7 domains: demographics, CCP resource utilization, patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training and education, and professional development. This voluntary survey was sent to members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy’s Critical Care Practice and Research Network. The survey was open for a total of 6 weeks. Results There was a response rate of 20.7% (332 of 1,605 invitees), with 66.6% of respondents (n = 221) completing at least 90% of the survey questions. Most respondents were clinical specialists (58.2%) and/or practiced at an academic medical center (58.5%). Direct patient care, quality improvement and medication safety, and teaching and precepting were identified as the CCP activities of highest importance to CCPs. The CCP-to-patient ratios considered ideal were 1:11-15 (selected by 49.8% of respondents) and 1:16-20 (33.9% of respondents). The ideal percentage of time dedicated to direct patient care activities, as identified by survey respondents, was 50% (interquartile range, 40-50). Conclusion These findings highlight the professional activities viewed as having the highest priority by CCPs. Future research is needed to define optimal CCP practice models for the delivery of patient care in real-world settings.

Medication safety strategies in European adult, paediatric, and neonatal intensive care units: a cross-sectional survey

ObjectivesPatients in intensive care units (ICUs) are potentially more vulnerable to medication errors than patients admitted to general wards. However, little is known about medication safety strategies used in European...

Bridging the gap: Advocating for the advancement of critical care pharmacists and critical care pharmacy practice.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Don't sweat the small stuff: A SWOT analysis for critical care pharmacists, appreciation for the past, present and future of the profession, and a call for reflection.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Next generation of critical care pharmacist practice studies: Beyond essential.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Getting back on the curve: Reimagining individualized, sustainable residency training for the critical care pharmacist.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Defining the "ideal state": A primer on critical care pharmacy practice models.

Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) have been clearly established as value-added members of the interprofessional team, and their contributions positively impact patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite this, not every critically ill patient in the US receives care from a CCP and the model through which CCPs practice is variable, which has important implications. The purpose of this primer is to review current CCP models and discuss elements of the optimal CCP practice model. Current CCP practice models are defined, including the drug processing and dispensing model, clinical pharmacy specialist model, integrated pharmacy generalist model, and hybrid model, as well as unit-based vs service-based models. The optimal CCP practice model considers the Triple Domain of CCP workload, which includes direct patient care, indirect patient care, and professional service. Elements of the ideal CCP practice model including 24/7/365 CCP services, unit- vs service-based models, prescriptive authority, operational support, and CCP-to-patient ratio are discussed. Other vital elements include dedicated offline time, use of appropriate workload metrics, development of career ladders, opportunities for professional development, and providing wellness resources. The ideal CCP practice model must also be considered through the lens of the patient and medical team, the CCP, the institution, and professional organizations. Strategies for optimizing current CCP practice models are provided, and application of optimal CCP practice model elements is explored through 5 case studies. The optimal CCP practice model includes multiple elements and incorporates the viewpoints of patients, providers, CCPs, institutions, and professional organizations; this model will increase access of all ICU patients to CCPs, enhance the scope of CCP cognitive services, and ensure the economic sustainability of CCP practice while establishing CCP involvement in activities outside of patient care and in professional service.

From symptoms to solutions: A structured approach to alleviating burnout among critical care pharmacists.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention in the Intensive Care Unit, Wad Medani, Sudan: A Cross-Sectional, Prospective Study.

Critical care pharmacists are uniquely qualified to provide a key role within the critical care multi-disciplinary team in managing the aspect of therapy, given their contributions to improved patient outcomes, medication safety, and reduced cost of the drug. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the frequency, type, and impact of clinical pharmacist interventions in the Intensive Care Unit and their physicians' acceptance. This was a cross-sectional, prospective study. Data were gathered over six months (15th June 2023 to 15th December 2023) on a daily basis, with a minimum sample size of 384 interventions. All patients admitted to the ICU at Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Gezira State, Sudan during the study period were included. In general, a total of 510 interventions were made for 123 patients throughout the six months course of study. Among them, 493 (96.7%) clinical pharmacist interventions were agreed by physicians. Among categories of interventions, most of the recommendations were concerned about safety 34.11% (174/510), in which drug discontinuation due to long duration was the highest one 48.27% (48/174) followed by the renal dose adjustment 30.46% (53/174). Another clinical intervention involving indication accounted for 23.33% (119/510) in second place. Regarding the cost-saving interventions the study showed that, of the total number of interventions, 124 had a costrelated component, accounting for (24.31%) of the total interventions. Among all the interventions, the addition of drug, with a frequency of 103 (20.2%) was the most recurring intervention, followed by dosing at 100 (19.6%), and renal dose adjustment at 53 (10.4%). This study demonstrated how clinical pharmacists might enhance critical care patients' quality management while reducing the costs associated with medication and care. In addition, it contributes valuable insights into the integration of clinical pharmacists in ICU settings, especially in resource-limited environments.

Critical care pharmacy service provision and workforce in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centres: a multicentre cross-sectional survey.

There is good evidence describing pharmacy workforce and service provision in general critical care units. However, no data exist from adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centres. To describe workforce characteristics, pharmacy service provision, and pharmaceutical care activities in critical care units (CCUs) providing an adult ECMO service in the United Kingdom (UK) and compare to national staffing standards for CCUs. We conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional electronic survey inviting one pharmacy professional response per UK ECMO centre. We collated information on workforce, service provision, and pharmaceutical care activities provided by pharmacy teams in adult CCUs with an ECMO service. The survey response rate was 90.9%: representatives of 10/11 tertiary hospitals providing ECMO services responded. Median critical care pharmacist to critical care bed was 1:12.1 (IQR: 1:9.4-1:14.9). Most centres (90.0%) did not meet national standards for pharmacy professionals to critical care bed staffing ratios for weekday services. Total critical care beds covered by the critical care pharmacy team varied across the UK: median (IQR) - 45 (37-80) beds. Two centres funded pharmacist time for ECMO activity, and one centre funded a pharmacy technician post. Median peak ECMO activity was 4 ECMO patients in a single day (IQR: 3-5). Most respondents reported reduced pharmacy service at weekends compared to weekday, with limited on-site support. Most responding ECMO centres in the UK reported pharmacy staffing ratios below nationally agreed critical care standards. There was high variability in clinical pharmacy services to ECMO patients over 7days.

NHS England announces funded training places for critical care pharmacists

NHS England announces funded training places for critical care pharmacists

1198. More is not Merrier: Mitigating Meropenem Misuse in the ICU at an Academic Medical Center

Abstract Background Inappropriate use of carbapenems is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance. The intensive care unit (ICU) at Mayo Clinic Arizona had a higher meropenem (MER) days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days (PD) compared to other Mayo Clinic Enterprise sites, despite low rates of Pseudomonal resistance to narrower spectrum anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams. Methods A multidisciplinary team of infectious diseases (ID) and critical care medicine (CCM) physicians and pharmacists was created to reduce inappropriate use of MER in the ICU. The baseline rate of appropriateness was determined by evaluating all MER days in the ICU during Q4 2019 and Q4 2020. Each MER day was designated as appropriate or inappropriate based on pre-determined criteria after review by at least one ID and one CCM member. Discordant days were evaluated by the whole team to achieve consensus. The team provided education to the CCM department on the initiative, baseline data, and strategies to reduce inappropriate MER use. The active intervention included prospective audit and feedback of all patients on MER performed by the ID clinical pharmacists Mon-Fri 0700-1530 in Q4 2022. DOT/1000 PD was assessed for the pre-intervention and intervention periods. Results The baseline rate of inappropriate MER use in the ICU was 52% (442/846 days). The two most common reasons for inappropriate MER use in the baseline period were: susceptible organism for which a narrower agent could have been used (93/442, 21%), and infectious workup/cultures negative (89/442, 20%). During the intervention period, the inappropriate rate of MER use was reduced to 23%, below the pre-determined goal of 30%. The MER DOT/1000 PD in the baseline period were 103.9 (Q4 2019) and 151.5 (Q4 2020) versus 66.1 (Q4 2022) in the intervention period. There was no difference in ICU sepsis-related mortality in the pre-intervention vs intervention period (13.4 vs 0%, p=0.04). Conclusion A multidisciplinary team approach, including education and prospective audit and feedback, reduced inappropriate MER use in the ICU of an academic medical center from 52 to 23%. An associated decrease in MER DOT/1000 patient days was also observed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Evaluation of Critical Care Pharmacist Evening Services at an Academic Medical Center.

Purpose: Critical care pharmacists are considered essential members of the healthcare team; however, justification and recruitment of new positions, especially in the evening or weekend shifts, remains a significant challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate the number of interventions, type of interventions, and associated cost savings with the addition of 1 board certified critical care clinical pharmacist to evening shift. Methods: This was a prospective collection and characterization of 1 evening shift critical care pharmacist's clinical interventions over a 12-week period. Interventions were collected and categorized daily from 13:00 to 22:00 Monday through Friday. After collection was complete, cost savings estimates were calculated using pharmacy wholesaler acquisition cost. Results: Interventions were collected on 52 of 60 weekdays. A total of 510 interventions were collected with an average of 9.8 interventions accepted per day. The most common interventions included transitions of care, medication dose adjustment, and antibiotic de-escalation and the highest proportion of interventions occurred in the medical intensive care unit. An estimated associated cost avoidance of $66 537.80 was calculated for an average of $1279.57 saved per day. Additionally, 22 (4.1%) of interventions were considered high yield interventions upon independent review by 2 pharmacists. Conclusion: The addition of 1 board-certified critical care pharmacist to evening shift resulted in multiple interventions across several categories and a significant cost avoidance when calculated using conservative measures.

The use of electronic health record embedded MRC-ICU as a metric for critical care pharmacist workload.

A lack of pharmacist-specific risk-stratification scores in the electronic health record (EHR) may limit resource optimization. The medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score was implemented into our center's EHR for use by clinical pharmacists. The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate MRC-ICU as a predictor of pharmacist workload and to assess its potential as an additional dimension to traditional workload measures. Data were abstracted from the EHR on adult ICU patients, including MRC-ICU scores and 2 traditional measures of pharmacist workload: numbers of medication orders verified and interventions logged. This was a single-center study of an EHR-integrated MRC-ICU tool. The primary outcome was the association of MRC-ICU with institutional metrics of pharmacist workload. Associations were assessed using the initial 24-h maximum MRC-ICU score's Pearson's correlation with overall admission workload and the day-to-day association using generalized linear mixed-effects modeling. A total of 1205 patients over 5083 patient-days were evaluated. Baseline MRC-ICU was correlated with both cumulative order volume (Spearman's rho 0.41, P < .001) and cumulative interventions placed (Spearman's rho 0.27, P < .001). A 1-point increase in maximum daily MRC-ICU was associated with a 31% increase in order volume (95% CI, 24%-38%) and 4% increase in interventions (95% CI, 2%-5%). The MRC-ICU is a validated score that has been previously correlated with important patient-centered outcomes. Here, MRC-ICU was modestly associated with 2 traditional objective measures of pharmacist workload, including orders verified and interventions placed, which is an important step for its use as a tool for resource utilization needs.