Critical Care Air Transport Teams Research Articles

Feasibility Assessment of Rapid Response EEG in the Identification of Nonconvulsive Seizures During Military Medical Air Transport.

Traumatic brain injury often requires neurologic care and specialized equipment, not often found downrange. Nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) occur in up to 30% of patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury and is associated with a 39% morbidity and an 18% mortality. It remains difficult to identify at bedside because of the heterogeneous clinical manifestations. The primary diagnostic tool is an electroencephalogram (EEG) which is large, requires an external power source, and requires a specialized technician and neurologist to collect and interpret the data. Rapid response EEG (rr-EEG) is an FDA-approved device that is pocket sized and battery powered and uses a disposable 10-electrode headset. Prior studies have demonstrated the noninferiority of rr-EEG in the identification of NCSE and NCS as compared to conventional EEG in hospitals. An unanswered question is whether rr-EEG could be used in the identification of NCSE and NCS by medics. In conjunction with the Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) team, a simulation was created and implemented on a CCAT training mission. The simulation team included a neurology resident, who oversaw the simulation, a pulmonary critical care fellow, an intensive care unit nurse, and a respiratory therapy. A survey was provided before and after the simulation. The team was expected to review the rr-EEG to make clinical decisions during ground transport, takeoff, and landing. The neurology resident monitored and recorded the team's ability to distinguish between NCS and a normal EEG. In between, the neurology resident monitored the quality of the EEG for potential interference and loss of quality. The CCAT team was able to efficiently set up the rr-EEG on a patient manikin, correctly identify visual EEG wave forms of a patient in NCS, and utilize the proprietary audio program of a simulated patient in NCS. The team reported that the device was easily set up in the environment, and the data were interpretable despite vibration, aircraft auditory and electrical noise, and the ergonomics of the aircraft medical section. This pilot study has validated a potentially revolutionary technology in medical transport. The rr-EEG technology is measurably user-friendly and will improve patient outcomes. This device and simulation can reduce time to an EEG by hours to days allowing for immediate treatment and intervention, which can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality.

Divide and Save: A Critical Care Air Transport Team Case With Prolonged Field Care

ABSTRACT Critical care air transport teams (CCATTs) specialize in providing intensive medical and postoperative resuscitative care during air evacuations. In a 2014 mission, a seasoned CCATT was urgently deployed to evacuate 6 American service members with gunshot wounds. Despite only having 2 hours of premission preparation and no further injury or treatment details, CCATT secured additional equipment, medications, and blood supply. Upon arrival to a foreign nonmilitary hospital, they discovered that American ground commanders had lost trust in local medical capabilities. One patient experienced prolonged extremity tourniquet time and surgical delay. This led to acute renal failure, preventing immediate evacuation without continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Deviating from the standard procedure, the CCATT obtained permission to split their team. The CCATT nurse attended 5 stabilized patients during unregulated critical care air transport with plans to swiftly return with CRRT equipment for the critical sixth patient. The physician and respiratory therapist remained at the foreign hospital for 2 days to provide prolonged field care. This case demonstrates the evolving mission scope of CCATT, which may encompass ground triage, prolonged field care, unregulated movement, and atypical CCATT equipment such as CRRT, occasionally necessitating a split team construct. To adapt to these evolving needs, updated policies and training now incorporate these diverse CCATT concepts, emphasizing the importance of flexibility in en route critical care missions.

Identifying and Reducing Insulin Errors in the Simulated Military Critical Care Air Transport Environment: A Human Factors Approach.

During high-fidelity simulations in the Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) Advanced course, we identified a high frequency of insulin medication errors and sought strategies to reduce them using a human factors approach. Of 169 eligible CCAT simulations, 22 were randomly selected for retrospective audio-video review to establish a baseline frequency of insulin medication errors. Using the Human Factors Analysis Classification System, dosing errors, defined as a physician ordering an inappropriate dose, were categorized as decision-based; administration errors, defined as a clinician preparing and administering a dose different than ordered, were categorized as skill-based. Next, 3 a priori interventions were developed to decrease the frequency of insulin medication errors, and these were grouped into 2 study arms. Arm 1 included a didactic session reviewing a sliding-scale insulin (SSI) dosing protocol and a hands-on exercise requiring all CCAT teams to practice preparing 10 units of insulin including a 2-person check. Arm 2 contained arm 1 interventions and added an SSI cognitive aid available to students during simulation. Frequency and type of insulin medication errors were collected for both arms with 93 simulations for arm 1 (January-August 2021) and 139 for arm 2 (August 2021-July 2022). The frequency of decision-based and skill-based errors was compared across control and intervention arms. Baseline insulin medication error rates were as follows: decision-based error occurred in 6/22 (27.3%) simulations and skill-based error occurred in 6/22 (27.3%). Five of the 6 skill-based errors resulted in administration of a 10-fold higher dose than ordered. The post-intervention decision-based error rates were 9/93 (9.7%) and 23/139 (2.2%), respectively, for arms 1 and 2. Compared to baseline error rates, both arm 1 (P = .04) and arm 2 (P < .001) had a significantly lower rate of decision-based errors. Additionally, arm 2 had a significantly lower decision-based error rate compared to arm 1 (P = .015). For skill-based preparation errors, 1/93 (1.1%) occurred in arm 1 and 4/139 (2.9%) occurred in arm 2. Compared to baseline, this represents a significant decrease in skill-based error in both arm 1 (P < .001) and arm 2 (P < .001). There were no significant differences in skill-based error between arms 1 and 2. This study demonstrates the value of descriptive error analysis during high-fidelity simulation using audio-video review and effective risk mitigation using training and cognitive aids to reduce medication errors in CCAT. As demonstrated by post-intervention observations, a human factors approach successfully reduced decision-based error by using didactic training and cognitive aids and reduced skill-based error using hands-on training. We recommend the development of a Clinical Practice Guideline including an SSI protocol, guidelines for a 2-person check, and a cognitive aid for implementation with deployed CCAT teams. Furthermore, hands-on training for insulin preparation and administration should be incorporated into home station sustainment training to reduced medication errors in the operational environment.

Impact of Rank, Provider Specialty, and Unit Sustainment Training Frequency on Military Critical Care Air Transport Team Readiness.

The Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) Advanced Course utilizes fully immersive high-fidelity simulations to assess personnel readiness for deployment. This study aims to determine whether simple well-defined demographic identifiers can be used to predict CCAT students' performance at CCAT Advanced. CCAT Advanced student survey data and course status (pass/fail) between March 2006 and April 2020 were analyzed. The data included students' Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), military status (active duty and reserve/guard), CCAT deployment experience (yes/no), prior CCAT Advanced training (yes/no), medical specialty, rank, and unit sustainment training frequency (never, frequency less often than monthly, and frequency at least monthly). Following descriptive analysis and comparative tests, multivariable regression was used to identify the predictors of passing the CCAT Advanced course for each provider type. A total of 2,576 student surveys were analyzed: 694 (27%) physicians (MDs), 1,051 (40%) registered nurses (RNs), and 842 (33%) respiratory therapists (RTs). The overall passing rates were 92.2%, 90.3%, and 85.4% for the MDs, RNs, and RTs, respectively. The students were composed of 579 (22.5%) reserve/guard personnel, 636 (24.7%) with CCAT deployment experience, and 616 (23.9%) with prior CCAT Advanced training. Regression analysis identified groups with lower odds of passing; these included (1) RNs who promoted from Captain to Major (post-hoc analysis, P = .03), (2) RTs with rank Senior Airman, as compared to Master Sergeants (post-hoc analysis, P = .04), and (3) MDs with a nontraditional AFSC (P = .0004). Predictors of passing included MDs and RNs with CCAT deployment experience, odds ratio 2.97 (P = .02) and 2.65 (P = .002), respectively; and RTs who engaged in unit CCAT sustainment at least monthly (P = .02). The identifiers prior CCAT Advanced training or reserve/guard military status did not confer a passing advantage. Our main result is that simple readily available metrics available to unit commanders can identify those members at risk for poor performance at CCAT Advanced readiness training; these include RNs with rank Major or above, RTs with rank Senior Airman, and RTs who engage in unit sustainment training less often than monthly. Finally, MD specialties which are nontraditional for CCAT have significantly lower CCAT Advanced passing rates, reserve/guard students did not outperform active duty students, there was no difference in the performance between different RN specialties, and for MD and RN students' previous deployment experience was a strong predictor of passing.

Efficacy of a Single Day Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Training Course for Critical Care Air Transport Team Eligible Personnel.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced medical technology that is used to treat respiratory and heart failure. The U.S. military has used ECMO in the care of combat casualties during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom as well as in the treatment of patients during the recent Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. However, few Military Health System personnel have training and experience in the use of ECMO therapy. To address this dearth of expertise, we developed and evaluated an accelerated ECMO course for military medical personnel. To compare the efficacy of an accelerated ECMO course for Military Health System critical care teams. Seventeen teams, each consisting of a physician and nurse, underwent a 5-h accelerated ECMO course. Similar to our previous live-tissue ECMO training program (phases I and II), each team watched prerecorded ECMO training lectures. Subjects then practiced priming the ECMO circuit, cannulating ECMO, initiating ECMO, and correcting common complications on an ECMO simulation model. An added component to this phase III project included transportation and telemedicine consultation availability. Training success was evaluated via knowledge and confidence assessments, and observation of each team attempting to initiate ECMO on a Yorkshire swine patient model, transport the patient model, and troubleshoot complications with the support of telemedicine consultation when desired. Seventeen teams successfully completed the course. All seventeen teams (100%) successfully placed the swine on veno-arterial ECMO. Of those, 15 teams successfully transitioned to veno-arterial-venous ECMO. The knowledge assessments of physicians and nurses increased by 12.2% from pretest (mean of 62.1%, SD 10.4%) to posttest (mean of 74.4%, SD 8.2%), P < .0001; their confidence assessments increased by 41.1% from pretest (mean of 20.1%, SD 11.8%) to posttest (mean of 61.2%, SD 18.6%). An abbreviated 1-day lecture and hands-on task-trainer-based ECMO course resulted in a high rate of successful skill demonstration and improvement of physicians' and nurses' knowledge assessments and confidence levels, similar to our previous live-tissue training program. When compared to our previous studies, the addition of telemedicine and patient transportation to this study did not affect the duration or performance of procedures.

An automated content-based measure of closed loop communication among critical care air transport teams.

Successful teamwork is essential to ensure critical care air transport (CCAT) patients receive effective care. Despite the importance of team performance, current training methods rely on subjective performance assessments and do not evaluate performance at the team level. Researchers have developed the Team Dynamics Measurement System (TDMS) to provide real-time, objective measures of team coordination to assist trainers in providing CCAT aircrew with feedback to improve performance. The first iteration of TDMS relied exclusively on communication flow patterns (i.e., who was speaking and when) to identify instances of various communication types such as closed loop communication (CLC). The research presented in this paper significantly advances the TDMS project by incorporating natural language processing (NLP) to identify CLC. The addition of NLP to the existing TDMS resulted in greater accuracy and fewer false alarms in identifying instances of CLC compared to the previous flow-based implementation. We discuss ways in which these improvements will facilitate instructor feedback and support further refinement of the TDMS.

When a Critically Ill Child is Oceans Away From a PICU: A Military Pediatric CCAT Mission.

A 4-year-old former 26-week premature male presented to the U.S. Naval Hospital Guam emergency department in respiratory failure secondary to human metapneumovirus requiring urgent intubation. His condition was complicated by a bradycardic arrest requiring 15 minutes of resuscitation before the return of circulation. He was admitted to the adult intensive care unit and was managed via pediatric telecritical care from San Diego. He developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute renal failure, hypotension requiring multiple pressors, and fluid overload necessitating bilateral chest tubes and two peritoneal drains. A pediatric critical care air transport team departed San Antonio within 36 hours of activation and transported the patient via C-17 to Hawaii, performing a tail swap to a KC-135. Before takeoff, mechanical delays caused prolonged ground time and lack of temperature control resulted in patient's hyperthermia to reach 104.2°F despite the ice packing. The ambient temperature caused equipment malfunction (suction, handheld blood analyzer, and ventilator), necessitating manual bagging. Despite initial temperature challenges, the team removed 700 mL of peritoneal fluid and substantially reduced the patient's ventilator settings. After 22 hours of care, the team arrived with the patient to a civilian pediatric intensive care unit in CA, USA. Over several weeks, the patient made a full recovery. This pediatric critical care air transport mission highlights the complications intrinsic to air transport. Missions of this severity and length benefit from utilization of pediatric specialists to minimize morbidity and mortality. Highlighting the challenges related to preparation, air frame, and equipment malfunction should help others prepare for future pediatric air transports.

Utilization of the En Route Aeromedical Patient Movement Form by Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

Understanding usage patterns of current paper-based documentation can inform the development of electronic documentation forms for en route care. The primary objective was to analyze the frequency of use of each field within the 3899 L Patient Movement Record documented by en route Critical Care Air Transport Teams. Secondary objectives were to identify rarely utilized form fields and to analyze the proportion of verifiable major events documented within the 3899 L form. We performed a retrospective review of 3899 L patient movement records for patients transported via Critical Care Air Transport Teams from January 2019 to December 2019. Scanned 3899 L forms were manually transcribed into a Microsoft Access database for evaluation and analysis. Proportions were calculated for completed fields. Major vital sign event frequency was compared for checkbox fields versus the vital sign flow sheet for each patient. We performed descriptive analyses for the proportion of charts with completed documentation in each evaluated field and the proportion of flow sheet events documented in major event fields. We analyzed 130 records. Fourteen of 18 (77.8%) demographic fields had a 75% or greater completion ratio. Sections with the largest proportion of rarely or never utilized fields (<1.5% completed) were procedures (77.8% of fields) and major events (63.9% of fields). Major event checkboxes had low sensitivity for documented events in the flow sheet: Change in heart rate greater than 20% (1 of 28 patients); increase in the fraction of inspired oxygen requirement of greater than 10% (6 of 23 patients); decrease in mean arterial pressure of greater than 20% (1 in 12 patients); and temperature less than 35.6°C (1 in 13 patients). Many of the current 3899 L fields are highly utilized, but some 3899 L sections contain high proportions of rarely utilized fields. Major event checkboxes did not consistently capture events documented within the in-flight vital sign flow sheet.

A Descriptive Study ofCasualties Evacuated Out ofAfghanistan by Critical Care Air Transport Teams During the Withdrawal ofU.S. Troops.

The War in Afghanistan ended in August 2021. Evacuation from the country was a large effort during the last days of the conflict. During evacuation efforts at Kabul Hamid Karzai International Airport, a suicide bombing occurred necessitating emergent medical care for many injured troops and civilians. The U.S. Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) played a role in the medical care provided during the operations in Afghanistan. We report on in-flight events and interventions that took place during the final days of the Afghanistan withdrawal. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients requiring aeromedical evacuation from the Afghanistan theater of operations by CCATT from July 1 to August 30, 2021. From the CCATT patient care record, data abstractors collected patient characteristics, flight information, vital signs, laboratory values, in-flight interventions, and in-flight events in a study-specific electronic database. We performed descriptive analyses of patient characteristics and in-flight interventions. This study was approved by the San Antonio Institutional Review Board. Nine patients were included in this analysis. Seven out of nine patients were foreign nationals; the remaining two were U.S. Marines. Five patients suffered penetrating injuries from gunshot wounds and four suffered blast injuries. Six received intravenous narcotic analgesia. Four received intravenous sedatives, and four received antibiotics in flight. Two patients required chest tube management. One patient received blood. Three patients were in acute respiratory distress. Severe injuries were sustained during the withdrawal efforts at the end of the War in Afghanistan. Critical Care Air Transport Teams played a role in the care and evacuation of patients out of theater during this unique and unprecedented time. Even given the limitations associated with retrospective studies and a small sample size, information reported in this study can help inform future decisions, and aid in preparatory efforts for future operations, that may require medical care by CCATT.

The Ability ofMilitary Critical Care Air Transport Members to Visually Estimate Percent Systolic Pressure Variation.

Inappropriate fluid management during patient transport may lead to casualty morbidity. Percent systolic pressure variation (%SPV) is one of several technologies that perform a dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness (FT-DYN). Trained anesthesia providers can visually estimate and use %SPV to limit the incidence of erroneous volume management decisions to 1-4%. However, the accuracy of visually estimated %SPV by other specialties is unknown. The aim of this article is to determine the accuracy of estimated %SPV and the incidence of erroneous volume management decisions for Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) team members before and after training to visually estimate and utilize %SPV. In one sitting, CCAT team providers received didactics defining %SPV and indicators of fluid responsiveness and treatment with %SPV ≤7 and ≥14.5 defining a fluid nonresponsive and responsive patient, respectively; they were then shown ten 45-second training arterial waveforms on a simulated Propaq M portable monitor's screen. Study subjects were asked to visually estimate %SPV for each arterial waveform and queried whether they would treat with a fluid bolus. After each training simulation, they were told the true %SPV. Seven days post-training, the subjects were shown a different set of ten 45-second testing simulations and asked to estimate %SPV and choose to treat, or not. Nonparametric limits of agreement for differences between true and estimated %SPV were analyzed using Bland-Altman graphs. In addition, three errors were defined: (1) %SPV visual estimate errors that would label a volume responsive patient as nonresponsive, or vice versa; (2) incorrect treatment decisions based on estimated %SPV (algorithm application errors); and (3) incorrect treatment decisions based on true %SPV (clinically significant treatment errors). For the training and testing simulations, these error rates were compared between, and within, provider groups. Sixty-one physicians (MDs), 64 registered nurses (RNs), and 53 respiratory technicians (RTs) participated in the study. For testing simulations, the incidence and 95% CI for %SPV estimate errors with sufficient magnitude to result in a treatment error were 1.4% (0.5%, 3.2%), 1.6% (0.6%, 3.4%), and 4.1% (2.2%, 6.9%) for MDs, RNs, and RTs, respectively. However, clinically significant treatment errors were statistically more common for all provider types, occurring at a rate of 7%, 10%, and 23% (all P < .05). Finally, students did not show clinically relevant reductions in their errors between training and testing simulations. Although most practitioners correctly visually estimated %SPV and all students completed the training in interpreting and applying %SPV, all groups persisted in making clinically significant treatment errors with moderate to high frequency. This suggests that the treatment errors were more often driven by misapplying FT-DYN algorithms rather than by inaccurate visual estimation of %SPV. Furthermore, these errors were not responsive to training, suggesting that a decision-making cognitive aid may improve CCAT teams' ability to apply FT-DYN technologies.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Burn Casualties Transported by the US Army Burn Flight Team and US Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

The US Army Burn Center, the only burn center in the Department of Defense provides comprehensive burn care. The Burn Flight Team (BFT) provides specialized burn care during transcontinental evacuation. During Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom, burn injuries accounted for approximately 5% of all injuries in military personnel. To augment BFT capacity, US Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) mobilized to transport burn patients. The purpose of this study was to describe critically ill, burn injured patients transported to the US Army Burn Center by BFT or CCATT, to compare and contrast characteristics, evacuation procedures, in-flight treatments, patient injuries/illnesses, and outcomes between the two groups. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of CCATT and BFT patients, admitted to the burn ICU between January 1, 2001 and September 30, 2018. Patients with total body surface area burned (TBSA) >30% were evacuated by BFT, while CCATT evacuated patients with ≤ 30% TBSA. Ninety-seven patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 40 (41%) were transported by the BFT and 57 (59%) were transported by CCATTs. Compared with patients transported by CCATTs, patients transferred by the BFT had higher median TBSA and full-thickness burn size, higher prevalence of chest, back and groin burns, and higher prevalence of inhalation injury. BFT patients had increased hospital days (62 vs. 37; P = .08), ICU days (29 vs. 12; P = .003) and ventilator days (14 vs. 6; P < .001). TBSA was the only variable significantly associated with ARDS (aOR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.08; P = 0.04), renal failure (aOR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.11; P = .002), and mortality (aOR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.13; P = .001). Evacuation by the BFT was associated with increased ICU and ventilator days, increased mortality, and a greater risk for developing renal failure. The severity of injury/TBSA likely accounted for most of these differences.

Relevance of Deployment Experience and Clinical Practice Characteristics on Military Critical Care Air Transport Team Readiness: A Study of Simulation Construct Validity.

The Critical Care Air Transport Team (CCATT) Advanced course utilizes fully immersive high-fidelity simulations to train CCATT personnel and assess their readiness for deployment. This study aims to (1) determine whether these simulations correctly discriminate between students with previous deployment experience ("experienced") and no deployment experience ("novices") and (2) examine the effects of students' clinical practice environment on their performance during training simulations. Critical Care Air Transport Team Advanced student survey data and course status (pass/no pass) between March 2006 and April 2020 were analyzed. The data included students' specialty, previous exposure to the CCATT Advanced course, previous CCATT deployment experience, years in clinical practice (<5, 5-15, and >15 years), and daily practice of critical care (yes/no), as well as a description of the students' hospital to include the total number of hospital (<100, 100-200, 201-400, and >400) and intensive care unit (0, 1-10, 11-20, and >20) beds. Following descriptive analysis and comparative tests, multivariable regression was used to identify the predictors of passing the CCATT Advanced course. A total of 2,723 surveys were analyzed: 841 (31%) were physicians (MDs), 1,035 (38%) were registered nurses, and 847 (31%) were respiratory therapists (RTs); 641 (24%) of the students were repeating the course for sustainment training and 664 (24%) had previous deployment experience. Grouped by student specialty, the MDs', registered nurses', and RTs' pass rates were 92.7%, 90.6%, and 85.6%, respectively. Multivariable regression results demonstrated that deployment experience was a robust predictor of passing. In addition, the >15 years in practice group had a 47% decrease in the odds of passing as compared to the 5 to 15 years in practice group. Finally, using MDs as the reference, the RTs had a 61% decrease in their odds of passing. The daily practice of critical care provided a borderline but nonsignificant passing advantage, whereas previous CCATT course exposure had no effect. Our primary result was that the CCATT Advanced simulations that are used to evaluate whether the students are mission ready successfully differentiated "novice" from "experienced" students; this is consistent with valid simulation constructs. Finally, novice CCATT students do not sustain their readiness skills during the period between mandated refresher training.

Hemodynamic events during en route critical care for patients with traumatic brain injury.

Exposure to stressors of flight may increase risk of secondary insults among critically injured combat casualties wounded with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of hemodynamic events by phase of transport among patients with TBI transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT). We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of 477 adults with moderate to severe TBI, who required transport by CCATT to Germany from multiple hospitals in the Middle East between January 2007 and May 2014. We abstracted clinical data from handwritten CCATT medical records. Hemodynamic events included systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg and cerebral perfusion pressure <60 mm Hg. We calculated the proportion of patients experiencing hemodynamic events for each phase of flight. We analyzed 404 subjects after exclusions for catastrophic brain injury (n = 39) and missing timestamps (n = 34). Subjects had high Injury Severity Scores (median, 29; interquartile range [IQR], 21-35) and a median flight time of 423 minutes (IQR, 392.5-442.5 minutes). The median of documented in-flight vital signs was 8 measurements (IQR, 6.5-8 measurements). Documented systolic blood pressure in-flight events occurred in 3% of subjects during ascent, 7.9% during early flight, 7.7% during late flight, and 2.2% during descent, with an overall in-flight prevalence of 13.9%. Among patients with intracranial pressure monitoring (n = 120), documented cerebral perfusion pressure events occurred in 5% of subjects during ascent, 23% during early flight, 17% during late flight, and 5.8% during descent, with an overall in-flight prevalence of 30.8%. Documented hemodynamic events occurred during each phase of flight in severely injured combat casualties wounded with TBI, and episodic documentation likely underestimated the actual in-flight frequency of secondary insults. Prognostic and epidemiological; Level IV.

En Route Critical Care Evacuations From Rarely Utilized Partner Medical Treatment Facilities: A Case Series With Lessons Learned.

Retaining lessons learned from Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) missions is essential given the recent decrease in operational currency among CCAT personnel. The objective of this case series was to identify and analyze logistical lessons learned from recent critical care transports involving foreign medical treatment facilities with sufficient detail for the CCAT community to incorporate these lessons into future readiness and sustainment training. The provider from each mission submitted a mission narrative with lessons learned. A qualitative analysis of lessons learned described themes from the lessons, as well as similarities and differences from included missions. Three missions were reviewed and four distinct mission stages were identified: (1) pre-mission, (2) at U.S. aircraft, (3) away from U.S. aircraft, and (4) post-mission. Pre-mission lessons learned included the need for professional civilian attire for deployed CCAT teams and the limited availability of pre-mission clinical information. Lessons learned at the aircraft included the following: the need for flexible mission timelines, coordinate and pre-plan transitions with foreign medical teams when possible, and plan for difficult environmental conditions if flight line transfer is required. Lessons learned away from the aircraft included communication challenges between CCAT and the aircraft, contingency planning for narcotic transports, and equipment interoperability issues. Post-mission lessons learned included the need for written communication to disseminate information to the CCAT community. This case series described logistical challenges that present during transport missions involving foreign hospitals. This published series will enable dissemination to the en route care community for possible incorporation into future training.

Association of Hypocalcemia With Mortality of Combat Casualties With Brain Injury and Polytrauma Transported by Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

Hypocalcemia at hospital presentation is associated with increased mortality in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. The 2019 updates to the Joint Trauma System Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) Clinical Practice Guideline recommend calcium supplementation for ionized calcium (iCa) measurements <1.2 mmol/L. Ionized calcium goals for en route critical care (ERCC) following DCR are less defined, and the impact of in-flight hypocalcemia events among critically injured combat wounded is unknown. This study aimed to describe the association between hypocalcemia and mortality for combat-wounded with brain injury and polytrauma requiring transport by Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT). We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury transported by CCATT out of combat theater between January 2007 and May 2014. Additional inclusion criteria included polytrauma and at least one documented in-flight iCa measurement. We categorized exposures based on the minimum in-flight iCa measurement as severe hypocalcemia (iCa <0.9 mmol/L), hypocalcemia (iCa 0.9-1.11 mmol/L), and never hypocalcemic (iCa ≥1.12 mmol/L). The primary outcome measure was mortality. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between hypocalcemia and mortality. We analyzed 190 subjects, with a median age of 24 years (interquartile range [IQR] 21 to 29 years) and 97.7% male gender. Explosive injuries (82.1%) and gunshot wounds (6.3%) were the most common mechanisms of injury. The median injury severity score was 34 (IQR 27 to 43). During the flight, 11.6% of patients had severe hypocalcemia, and 39.5% had hypocalcemia. Among patients with any hypocalcemia measurement in-flight (n = 97), 41.2% had hypocalcemia on pre-flight iCa, 28.9% received blood products in-flight, and 23.7% received in-flight calcium supplementation. Only 32.4% of patients with hypocalcemia or severe hypocalcemia in the setting of vasopressor administration received in-flight calcium supplementation. There was no significant difference in mortality between severe hypocalcemia (9.1%), hypocalcemia (5.3%), and never hypocalcemic (3.2%) patients even after controlling for pre-flight variables. In-flight hypocalcemia events were common among critically ill combat-wounded polytrauma patients transported by CCATT but were not associated with differences in mortality. Future training should emphasize the need for calcium correction among ERCC patients requiring vasopressors. Future studies with larger sample sizes of patients receiving ERCC are needed to assess the association between in-flight calcium supplementation with clinical outcomes.

Evacuation Strategies for U.S. Casualties with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) with and without Polytrauma.

According to the Military Health System Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Center of Excellence, 51,261 service members suffered moderate to severe TBI in the last 21 years. Moderate to severe TBI in service members is usually related to blast injury in combat operations, which necessitates medical evacuation to higher levels of care. Prevention of secondary insult, and mitigation of the unique challenges associated with the transport of TBI patients in a combat setting are important in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with this injury. The primary goal of this study was a secondary analysis comparing the impact of time to transport on clinical outcomes for TBI patients without polytrauma versus TBI patients with polytrauma transported out of the combat theater via Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT). Our secondary objective was to describe the occurrence of in-flight events and interventions for TBI patients without polytrauma versus TBI with polytrauma to assist with mission planning for future transports. We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of 438 patients with TBI who were evacuated out of theater by CCATT from January 2007 to May 2014. Polytrauma was defined as abbreviated injury scale (AIS) of at least three to another region in addition to head/neck. Time to transport was defined as the time (in days) from injury to CCATT evacuation out of combat theater. We calculated descriptive statistics and examined the associations between time to transport and preflight characteristics, in-flight interventions and events, and clinical outcomes for TBI patients with and without polytrauma. We categorized patients into two groups, those who had a TBI without polytrauma (n = 179) and those with polytrauma (n = 259). Within each group, we further divided those that were transported within 1 day of injury, in 2 days, and 3 or more days. Patients with TBI without polytrauma transported in 1 or 2 days were more likely to have a penetrating injury, an open head injury, a preflight Glascow Coma Score (GCS) of 8 or lower, and be mechanically ventilated compared to those transported later. Patients without polytrauma who were evacuated in 1 or 2 days required more in-flight interventions compared to patients without polytrauma evacuated later. Patients with polytrauma who were transported in 2 days were more likely to receive blood products, and patients with polytrauma who were evacuated within 1 day were more likely to have had at least one episode of hypotension en route. Polytrauma patients who were evacuated in 2-3 days had higher hospital days compared to polytrauma with earlier evacuations. There was no significant difference in mortality between any of the groups. In patients with moderate to severe TBI transported via CCATT, early evacuation was associated with a higher rate of in-flight hypotension in polytrauma patients. Furthermore, those who had TBI without polytrauma that were evacuated in 1-2 days received more in-flight supplementary oxygen, blood products, sedatives, and paralytics. Given the importance of minimizing secondary insults in patients with TBI, recognizing this in this subset of the population may help systematize ways to minimize such events. Traumatic Brain Injury patients with polytrauma may benefit from further treatment and stabilization in theater prior to CCATT evacuation.

Development of a Critical Care Air Transport Team "Go Bag": Slimming Down ICU Capability to Augment Pararescue or Civilian Contract Medical Evacuation Personnel.

Critical Care Air Transport Team (CCATT) is a three-person United States Air Force (USAF) medical asset, typically providing intercontinental medical evacuation on large military aircraft. The CCATT equipment Allowance Standard (AS) weighs approximately 272 kg (600 lbs). In austere locations, CCATT teams may augment contract medical evacuation (CME) personnel or Pararescue (PJ) in small aircraft with limited space for medical equipment. It was unknown what deployed PJ and CME carry within their packouts. We sought to design a packout or "Go Bag," weighing less than 22.7 kg (50 lbs) and sourced from the CCATT AS, that a CCATT member could use to complement CME or PJ equipment to provide a higher level of care while limiting redundancy. Equipment lists were obtained from a CME and PJs from two separate USAF squadrons. The equipment lists were combined to provide a reference for development of a CCATT Go Bag. Three members of a deployed CCATT team independently generated a list of necessary equipment from the CCATT AS. The list was peer reviewed by a separate, deployed CCATT team. A Go Bag was developed with the supplies and equipment necessary for video laryngoscopy, ventilation, invasive pressure monitoring, basic laboratory capability, chest tube placement, ultrasound, and advanced pharmacologic interventions. The Go Bag weighed 18.3 kg (40.4 lbs). A separate respiratory bag weighing 1.1 kg (2.4 lbs) was attached directly to a ventilator. Intravenous pumps and cardiac monitoring equipment were notable ICU equipment excluded from the Go Bag. Major components of the CCATT AS can be reduced into a Go Bag and accompanying Ventilator Accessory Bag. This may benefit CCATT teams required to augment PJs or CME in small aircraft during prolonged field care scenarios.

TELE-ECMO FOR A YOUNG, ACTIVE DUTY SERVICEMEMBER IN A DOMESTIC COVID-19 HOTSPOT

TOPIC: Critical Care TYPE: Fellow Case Reports INTRODUCTION: Through the Joint Tele-Critical Care Network (JTCCN), the U.S. military has demonstrated that tele-critical care (TCC) services can facilitate the safe delivery of critical care beyond the consulting provider's level of training. While TCC has been described in a variety of scenarios, virtual health support of adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) management has not been previously reported. We present a case of a young, active duty servicemember with COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by acute hypoxemic respiratory failure refractory to conventional therapy who was cannulated for veno-venous ECMO and successfully managed for 72 hours with TCC support. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39 year-old male Active Duty Service Member (ADSM) presented to Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) with hypoxemic respiratory failure five days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. He was given supportive oxygen therapy, Remdesivir and dexamethasone. On hospital day nine, he was intubated for refractory hypoxemia and the ratio of arterial pO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio) one hour later was 74. Neuromuscular blockade and prone positioning were initiated. Three days later, the P/F ratio remained less than 100. A request to transfer the patient to a local partner facility for ECMO was declined due to lack of bed availability.The San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC) ECMO Team was consulted via TCC and the patient was placed on veno-venous ECMO, as personnel at NMCSD had previously undergone cannulation training. The NMCSD critical care team had round-the-clock secure video teleconferencing connection to the perfusionists and physician ECMO specialists at SAMMC during this time. After 72 hours of tele-ECMO management without complications, a U.S. Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Team safely transferred the patient 1,276 miles by fixed-wing aircraft to SAMMC for ongoing care. DISCUSSION: As the only certified ECMO center in the Department of Defense and one of the few centers in the world with global air transport capability, SAMMC has partnered with NMCSD to provide short-term ECMO care with TCC support. Previously, this capability had not been demonstrated over a period longer than a few hours. Because this patient's clinical decompensation occurred during the peak of the COVID-19 surge in Southern California, rapid transfer to a local ECMO center was not possible. In this case, JTCCN enabled the provision of lifesaving advanced cardiopulmonary support to an ADSM until aeromedical evacuation could be arranged. CONCLUSIONS: This case serves as proof-of-concept for a hub and spoke model of tele-ECMO support to global military medical facilities, demonstrating the potential to bring sophisticated lifesaving technology to medically-austere environments anywhere in the world. REFERENCE #1: Davis K, Perry-Moseanko A, Tadlock MD, Henry N, Pamplin J. Successful Implementation of Low-Cost Tele-Critical Care Solution by the U.S. Navy: Initial Experience and Recommendations. Mil Med. 2017 May;182(5):e1702-e1707. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00277. PMID: 29087914. REFERENCE #2: Read MD, Nam JJ, Biscotti M, Piper LC, Thomas SB, Sams VG, Elliott BS, Negaard KA, Lantry JH, DellaVolpe JD, Batchinsky A, Cannon JW, Mason PE. Evolution of the United States Military Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Transport Team. Mil Med. 2020 Dec 30;185(11-12):e2055-e2060. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa215. PMID: 32885813. REFERENCE #3: Badulak J, Antonini MV, Stead CM, Shekerdemian L, Raman L, Paden ML, Agerstrand C, Bartlett RH, Barrett N, Combes A, Lorusso R, Mueller T, Ogino MT, Peek G, Pellegrino V, Rabie AA, Salazar L, Schmidt M, Shekar K, MacLaren G, Brodie D. ECMO for COVID-19: Updated 2021 Guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). ASAIO J. 2021 Feb 26. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001422. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33657573. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by John Hunninghake, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Phillip Mason, source=Web Res onse No relevant relationships by Jeremy Pamplin, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Nick Rohrhoff, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Melissa Rosas, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Jesse Sherratt, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Robert Walter, source=Web Response

Descriptive Analysis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Air Medical Evacuations by Critical Care Air Transport Teams

ObjectivePreserving air medical evacuation capabilities for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) required innovation for en route care logistics, training, and equipment. The aim of this study was to describe characteristics and in-flight interventions for patients with suspected COVID-19 requiring air medical evacuation by US Air Force critical care air transport teams (CCATTs). MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients with suspected COVID-19 requiring air medical evacuation by CCATT from April 2020 to February 2021. We included patients with an available CCATT medical record and transport with COVID-19 infection isolation precautions. CCATT medical records were the data source, and we performed descriptive analyses of patient characteristics and in-flight interventions. ResultsWe reviewed 460 records and identified 16 patients for inclusion. The Transport Isolation System (50%) and Negatively Pressurized Conex (31%) were commonly used portable biocontainment units. The median patient age was 48.5 years, and 94% were male. All patients required oxygen supplementation, with 8 (50%) receiving mechanical ventilation. In-flight interventions among intubated patients (n = 8) included vasopressors (50%), paralytics (25%), and patient-ventilator asynchrony management (63%). ConclusionPatients with COVID-19 requiring CCATT transport were older than prior military en route care cohorts, and in-flight interventions for patient-ventilator asynchrony were commonly required during mechanical ventilation.

Transpacific Aeromedical Evacuation for a Ruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

ABSTRACTThe COVID-19 pandemic has altered preexisting patient treatment algorithms and referral patterns, which has affected neurosurgical care worldwide. Brain arteriovenous malformations are complex vascular lesions that frequently present with intracerebral hemorrhage. Care for these patients is best performed at large medical centers by specialists with high volumes. The authors describe the care of a patient who presented in extremis to a resource-limited, community-sized military treatment facility (MTF) in Southeast Asia. In the MTF, the patient underwent emergent neurosurgical therapy. However, given newly implemented restrictions enacted to mitigate COVID-19 spread, local transfer for definitive care to a tertiary care facility was not possible. In order to attain definitive care for the patient, a transpacific aeromedical evacuation augmented with a critical care air transport team was utilized for transfer to a tertiary care, teaching hospital. This case demonstrates the safe treatment of a patient with hemorrhagic arteriovenous malformations and postoperative management under limited conditions in an MTF outside the CONUS. Given the unique circumstances and challenges the pandemic presented, the authors feel that this patient’s outcome was only possible by leveraging all the capability military medicine has to offer.