Criteria For Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Research Articles

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract and the Need for Rescue Surgery-A Multicenter Analysis.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for early malignant lesions in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Its clinical results have been reported to be as good as surgery. The outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD have been reported to be as good as first-line surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of ESD in the upper GI tract and the outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD performed in Linz, Austria, between 2009 and January 2023. A total of 193 ESDs were included and divided into 104 esophageal ESD and 89 gastric ESD procedures. The criteria for curative ESD were in line with established guidelines' recommendations. For esophageal lesions, the mean lesion size was 40.3 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 56.7%. In the non-curative ESD, the rate of technical failure as the reason for non-curative ESD was 13.3% and the oncological failure rate was 86.7%. Only 48.7% of indicated rescue surgeries were performed. The main reason for not performing surgery was interdisciplinary consensus due to comorbidity. Perioperative complications Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3 occurred in 22.2% of cases with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0. In gastric lesions, the mean size was 39 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 69.7%. The rate of technical failure as a reason for non-curative ESD was 25.9% and the oncological failure rate was 74.1% for non-curative ESD. Rescue surgery was performed in 48.2% of indicated cases. The perioperative rate for major complications was 0. The outcome of ESD in the upper GI tract is in line with the published literature, and non-curative ESD does not worsen surgical outcomes. The available follow-up data are in line with the international published literature, showing a low rate of residual malignancy in surgical resection specimens. Therefore, the indication of rescue surgery for oncological failure remains challenging. Furthermore, the learning curve of ESD has shown a trend towards improving outcomes over time.

Endoscopic Diagnosis and Therapy for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer.

Epstein-Barr-virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) represents almost 7% of all GC and is a distinct subtype of GC with extreme DNA hypermethylation. EBVaGC is a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte-rich tumor with little lymph-node metastasis in its early stage and with a relatively favorable prognosis in its advanced stage. Using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, we recognize EBVaGC as a mainly depressed type with SMT-like protrusion in the upper part of the stomach near the gastric mucosal atrophic border or remnant stomach. The EBVaGC recognition rate of 21.4% with the endoscopic motif is not high, and further progress in endoscopic diagnosis of EBVaGC is needed. As less invasive endoscopic therapy, the extension of the criteria of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early EBVaGC with little lymph-node metastasis should be discussed. Endoscopic diagnosis of EBVaGC may be relevant for the selection of patients who could benefit from endoscopic treatment or chemotherapy.

Impact of endoscopy intervals on metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Comparison between 1 year and half-a-year.

Japanese guidelines recommend posttreatment endoscopy once or twice a year after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. However, the impact of endoscopy intervals on metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) remains unclear, especially the difference between 1-year and half-a-year intervals. We aimed to investigate this difference. This study retrospectively investigated 2429 patients who underwent gastric ESD between May 2001 and June 2019 at our hospital. Patients who developed MGC were classified based on those who underwent the previous endoscopy within at least 7 months (short-interval group) and within 8-13 months (regular-interval group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for possible confounders. The primary outcome was the proportion of MGC beyond curative ESD criteria established in the guidelines. A total of 216 eligible patients developed MGC. The short- and regular-interval groups included 43 and 173 patients, respectively. Overall, no patients in the short-interval group had MGC beyond curative ESD criteria, while 27 patients in the regular-interval group did. The proportion of MGC beyond curative ESD criteria was significantly lower in the short-interval group than in the regular-interval group before (P = 0.003) and after (P = 0.028) PSM. Although not significant, the short-interval group tended to have a higher stomach preservation rate than the regular-interval group (P = 0.093). Our study indicated a possible benefit of biannual surveillance endoscopy in the early post-ESD period.

Nomogram for pre-procedural prediction of non-curative endoscopic resection in patients with early gastric cancer

BackgroundNon-curative resection (non-CR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires additional surgery due to the possibility of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Therefore, it is important to accurately predict the risk of non-CR to avoid unnecessary preoperative procedures. Thus, we aimed to develop and verify a nomogram to predict the risk of non-CR prior to ESD.MethodsPatients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer (EGC) were divided into CR and non-CR groups based on the present ESD criteria. The pre-procedural factors, such as endoscopic features, radiologic findings, and pathology of the lesion, were compared between the groups to identify the risk factors associated with non-CR. A nomogram was developed using multivariate analysis, and its predictive value was assessed using an external validation group.ResultsAmong 824 patients, 682 were curative (82.7%) and 142 were non-curative (17.3%). By comparing two groups, endoscopic features including redness, whitish mucosal change, fold convergence, and large lesion size; histologic features such as moderately or poorly differentiated or signet ring cell carcinoma; and abnormal CT findings including non-specific lymph node enlargement and fold thickening were identified as significant predictors of non-CR. The nomogram was developed based on these predictors and showed good predictive performance in the external validation, with an area under the curve of 0.87.ConclusionsWe developed a nomogram to predict the risk of non-CR prior to ESD. These predictive factors in addition to the existing ESD criteria can help provide the best treatment option for patients with EGC.

Risks and benefits of additional surgery for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach meeting non-curative resection criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BackgroundAdditional surgery is recommended after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. However, it is not easy to recommend for tumors located in the upper third of the stomach, because it would be a total or proximal gastrectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the actual risks and benefits of additional gastrectomy for upper third tumors.MethodsWe reviewed the clinicopathological data of patients who underwent total or proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach between March 2002 and January 2021. The incidence of lymph node metastasis and postoperative complications were calculated, and risk factors for lymph node metastasis were identified using logistic regression analysis. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsA total of 523 patients underwent total or proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer; 379 of them had tumors meeting the non-curative resection criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection. The overall lymph node metastasis rate was 9.5%, and lymphovascular invasion was the only significant risk factor for lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001). The most common sites of lymph node metastasis were stations 1, 3, and 7, with their rates being 3.2%, 3.7%, and 3.2%, respectively. Overall and severe (Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher) postoperative complication rates were 21.1% and 14.0%, respectively, while postoperative mortality was 0.5% (2/379). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with and without lymph node metastasis were 96.1% and 81.1%, respectively (p = 0.076).ConclusionsBefore planning an additional gastrectomy after non-curative endoscopic resection for the upper third tumor, we should consider both the benefit of the 9.5% curability for lymph node metastasis and the risks of the 21% postoperative complications and 0.5% mortality.

Assessment of tumor extension to the ductal system of submucosal glands in patients with superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms: Implications for endoscopic resection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia (SESCN); however, local recurrence still occurs occasionally even in patients who meet the current curative criteria. Esophageal ducts of the submucosal gland may serve as a pathway for the spread of SESCN to a deeper layer. However, the clinical impact of ductal involvement (DI) in patients undergoing ESD has yet to be investigated. We consecutively enrolled patients with SESCN who were treated with ESD. The resected specimens were meticulously reviewed in multiple section slices for the presence and resected margins of DI, and their correlations with clinical factors were evaluated. A total of 210 lesions were analyzed, of which 78 (37.1%) presented with DI. The presence of submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and DI were indicators of worse prognosis (P<.05). Deep extended DIs were misdiagnosed as deep submucosal invasive cancer in 4 cases (2%). Of the 185 patients who met the criteria for curative ESD (ie, R0 resection and no deep submucosal invasion or LVI), 11 (5.9%) developed local recurrence/metastasis during a mean follow-up of 55.2months (range, 6 to 140) months. Compared with patients with without DI, patients with DI had worse recurrence-free survival (P=.008, log-rank test) and a higher local risk of recurrence (12.7% vs 2.5%) after curative ESD (hazard ratio, 4.20; P=.038). A precise histological assessment of DI in SESCN is crucial after ESD, given that DI is common and associated with worse outcome. Whether total removal of esophageal glands/ducts can improve outcome requires future study.

Reevaluation of the expanded indications in undifferentiated early gastric cancer for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUNDAlthough the criteria for the indication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for undifferentiated early gastric cancer (UD-EGC) have been recently proposed, accumulating reports on the non-negligible rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM) after indicated ESD raise questions on the reliability of the current criteria. AIMTo investigate the prevalence and risk factors of LNM in UD-EGC cases meeting the expanded indication for ESD.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 4780 UD-EGC cases that underwent surgical resection between January 2008 and February 2019 at Asan Medical Center, a tertiary university hospital in Korea. To identify the risk factors of LNM of UD-EGC meeting the expanded criteria for ESD, we performed a case-control study by matching the cases with LNM to those without at a ratio of 1:4. We reviewed the clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features of the cases to identify features with a significant difference according to the presence of LNM. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs).RESULTSOf the 4780 UD-EGC cases, 1240 (25.9%) were identified to meet the expanded indication for ESD. Of the 1240 cases, 14 (1.1%) cases had LNM. Among the various clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological features that were evaluated, mixed histology (tumors consisting of 10%-90% of signet ring cells) had a marginally significant association (P = 0.059) with the risk of LNM. Moreover, diffuse blurring of the muscularis mucosae (MM) underneath the tumorous epithelium, a previously unrecognized histologic feature, had a significant association with the absence of LNM (P = 0.028). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the blurring of MM was the only explanatory variable significantly associated with a reduced risk of LNM (OR: 0.12, 95%CI: 0.02-0.95; P = 0.045).CONCLUSIONThe risk of LNM is higher than expected when using the current expanded indication for UD-EGC. Histological evaluation could provide useful clues for reducing the risk of LNM.

Extragastric Metastasis of Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Lymphovascular Invasion and Negative Resected Margins.

Lymphovascular invasion is a criterion for non-curative resection in patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). We aimed to determine the rate of extragastric metastasis (EGM) and identify the predictors of EGM in patients with negative resection margins (R0 resection) and lymphovascular invasion in post-ESD pathology. A total of 2,983 patients underwent ESD for EGC. Among them, 110 had a pathology of R0 resection and positive lymphovascular invasion. Patients underwent additional gastrectomy (n=63) or further follow-up without gastrectomy (n=47). The 110 patients were assigned to one of the 3 groups according to ESD indications based on post-ESD pathology. The first group satisfied the absolute indication for ESD (n=18), the second group satisfied the expanded indications for ESD (n=34), and the last group satisfied the beyond indication (n=58). The number of occurrences of EGM in each group was 1 (5.6%), 3 (8.8%), and 3 (5.2%), respectively. The logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, and indication for ESD, showed that larger tumor size was associated with EGM (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.10; P=0.048). In contrast, ESD indication criteria did not affect EGM (P=0.349). Tumor size was the only predictive indicator for EGM in patients who underwent R0 resection and lymphovascular invasion on post-ESD pathology. Even patients with pathology corresponding to the absolute indication criteria of ESD had lymphovascular invasion, which means that they require additional gastrectomy due to the risk of EGM.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasms: A Latin American Cohort Study.

Background/AimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred technique for treating early gastric cancer (EGC). However, very few studies have been conducted in South America. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ESD for EGC. MethodsWe analyzed data from a prospective cohort from 2013 to 2020. A total of 152 superficial gastric neoplasms that fulfilled the absolute or expanded criteria for ESD were included. Outcomes were en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates, incidence of adverse events, and length of procedure. ResultsThe age of the enrolled patients was 68.4±11.3 years. The number of included patients based on the absolute and expanded indications was 150 and 2, respectively. En bloc, R0, and curative resections were achieved in 98.0%, 96.1%, and 89.5% of the cases, respectively. Bleeding and perforation were reported in 5.9% and 6.6% of the cases, respectively. Histopathological examination revealed low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in 13, 20, 117, and 2 cases, respectively. ConclusionsOur study shows that ESD performed by properly trained endoscopists in reference centers is safe and effective, with comparable therapeutic outcomes to those reported in the Eastern series.

Impact of Comorbidities, Sarcopenia, and Nutritional Status on the Long-Term Outcomes after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients Aged ≥ 80 Years.

Simple SummaryThe average human life expectancy is increasing worldwide, which is leading to increases in the proportion of elderly patients (≥80 years) with gastric cancer. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely regarded as a safe and effective treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC), even in aged or high-risk patients. We investigated the oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) by focusing on the impact of comorbidities, sarcopenia, and nutritional status. Over a median follow-up period of 70.5 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.5% and 77.1%, respectively; of the114 patients who died, only four (3.5%) were due to gastric cancer. A total of 173 (61.8%) had sarcopenia, and they had lower rates of 3-year (88.4% vs. 91.4%) and 5-year (73.1% vs. 84.0%; p = 0.046) OS than did those without sarcopenia. In multivariable analyses, prognostic nutritional index (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90–0.98; p = 0.002) and Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.37; p = 0.018) showed that ESD was a feasible and safe therapeutic method to use in elderly patients, whose long-term survival was significantly associated with nutritional status and comorbidities.Background/Aim: We investigated the oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) by focusing on the impact of comorbidities, sarcopenia, and nutritional status. Methods: Between 2005 and 2016, 280 patients aged ≥ 80 years with 289 EGCs underwent ESD at a tertiary care center. The short- and long-term survival outcomes were assessed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with survival, including clinicopathologic factors and abdominal muscle area measured by computed tomography. Results: The rates of en bloc, R0, and, curative resection were 99.3%, 90.0%, and 69.2%, respectively. The rates of post-ESD bleeding and perforation rates were 2.1% and 3.1%, respectively, and no cases showed significant life-threatening adverse events. Over a median follow-up period of 70.5 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.5% and 77.1%, respectively; of the114 patients who died, only four (3.5%) were due to gastric cancer. A total of 173 (61.8%) had sarcopenia, and they had lower rates of 3-year (88.4% vs. 91.4%) and 5-year (73.1% vs. 84.0%; p = 0.046) OS than did those without sarcopenia. In multivariable analyses, prognostic nutritional index (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90–0.98; p = 0.002) and Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.37; p = 0.018) were significant factors associated with overall survival. Conclusions: ESD was a feasible and safe therapeutic method to use in elderly patients, whose long-term survival was significantly associated with nutritional status and comorbidities. These results suggest the need for a possible extension of the curative criteria for ESD in elderly patients with EGC.

Quantifying early gastric cancer in Australia: What is the opportunity for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection?

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the recommended treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, there are challenges in attaining expertise in ESD in countries where the incidence of gastric cancer and proportion diagnosed at an early stage of disease are relatively low. This study aims to establish the proportion of gastric cancer meeting histological criteria for EGC, which may be suitable for ESD, in a Western population. Gastric cancers reported to the Victorian Cancer Registry between January 2011 and December 2016 were analyzed. EGC was defined as tumor confined to mucosa (T1a) or submucosa (T1b). Histology reports were analyzed using Japanese and European guidelines to identify potential ESD candidates. Criteria for extended ESD were based on grade of differentiation, tumor depth, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and ulceration. Twenty percent of 1217 gastric cancers was EGC (237 cases), with detailed histopathology reports suitable for evaluating ESD criteria recorded in 182 cases. Standard and extended ESD criteria were met in 46% (84/182) and 75% (132/182), respectively. Actual treatment of the 237 EGC was endoscopic in 14% (n=33) and surgery in 86% (n=204). Endoscopically treated EGCs were more likely to be stage T1a and located in the proximal stomach. EGCs represented 20% of reported gastric adenocarcinomas with the majority fulfilling criteria for ESD. ESD should be considered in the management algorithm and discussed at tumor board meetings involving interventional endoscopists. To increase utilization of ESD, systems need to be implemented to improve training, accreditation, and access to ESD.

Papillary Adenocarcinoma

Gastric papillary adenocarcinoma is one of the histological variants of gastric cancer that shows more aggressive clinicopathological behavior compared to tubular adenocarcinoma. Previous studies have reported higher lymphovascular and submucosal invasion rates for papillary adenocarcionoma than those of tubular adenocarcinoma. However, the current guidelines categorize papillary adenocarcinoma and tubular adenocarcinoma together as differentiated-type tumor and have recommended the same endoscopic submucosal dissection criteria. Thus, concerns have been raised regarding the appropriateness of the current policy. To validate the current guidelines, the lymph node metastasis rate from surgical specimen studies as well as the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for papillary adenocarcinomas need to be taken into consideration. In this review, I aimed to review the current understanding of the clinical and pathological features of papillary adenocarcinoma. In addition, I aimed to generate an integrated view regarding the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for papillary adenocarcinoma in order to evaluate the appropriateness of the current guidelines.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: a nationwide multi-center study.

Undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD EGC) shows lower curative resection rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Additional surgery is recommended after non-curative resection. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of ESD followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in UD EGC compared to those for surgery as initial treatment. We reviewed 1139 UD EGC patients who underwent ESD at 18 hospitals and 1956 patients who underwent surgery at two hospitals between February 2005 and May 2015. We enrolled 636 patients with non-curative ESD and 1429 surgery subjects beyond the curative ESD criteria. Among them, 133 patients with additional surgery after ESD (ESD + OP group) and 252 patients without additional surgery (ESD-only group) were matched 1:1 using propensity scores to patients with surgery as initial treatment (surgery group). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. Signet ring cell carcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) were observed in 939 and 1126 cases, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the surgery group than in the ESD + OP group, especially for PDA. However, RFS was shorter in the ESD-only group than those in the ESD + OP and surgery groups. RFS did not differ significantly between the ESD + OP and surgery groups. Compared to the surgery group, the ESD-only and ESD + OP groups had an overall hazard ratio for RFS of 3.58 (95% confidence interval 1.44-8.88) and 0.46 (0.10-2.20), respectively. ESD followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection showed comparable cancer-specific outcomes to initial surgery in UD EGC.

A case of synchronous intramucosal gastric carcinoma with multiple lymph node metastases

BackgroundIn Japan, the prevalence of synchronous multiple intramucosal gastric carcinoma is reported to be 5–15%. Here is a case of a synchronous small gastric carcinoma fulfilling the definite indication and curative criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection with multiple lymph node metastases.Case presentationA Japanese woman in her fifties with a history of endoscopic resection for mucosal poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was evaluated, with the UICC TNM classification stage being cT1aN0M0 cStageIA. She had undergone total gastrectomy with D1 + lymph node dissection. Histopathological examination revealed 16 individual sporadic lesions in the gastric body, with maximum diameter 3 mm and localization in the lamina propria. Twenty-seven nodes were resected, and metastasis of the carcinoma was revealed in 24 nodes.ConclusionsUndifferentiated intramucosal gastric cancer has a relatively high probability of lymph node metastasis; however, synchronous early lesions are often overlooked. Frequent follow-up examinations may increase the detection of multiple gastric cancers.

Characteristics of interval gastric neoplasms detected within two years after negative screening endoscopy among Koreans

BackgroundIn Korea, where gastric cancer is highly prevalent, biennial endoscopy is recommended among individuals over 40. Even under regular screening, some are still diagnosed at advanced stages. We aimed to identify characteristics of interval gastric neoplasms (IGNs) with rapid progression.ResultsNewly-diagnosed gastric neoplasms detected in screening endoscopy between January 2004 and May 2016 were reviewed. Among them, those who had previous endoscopy within 2 years were enrolled. Endoscopic findings, family history of gastric cancer, smoking, and H. pylori status were analysed. Totally, 297 IGN cases were enrolled. Among them, 246 were endoscopically treatable IGN (ET-IGN) and 51 were endoscopically untreatable IGNs (EUT-IGN) by the expanded criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Among EUT-IGNs, 78% were undifferentiated cancers (40/51) and 33% showed submucosal invasion (13/40). They were median 2.0 cm in size and more commonly located in the proximal stomach than ET-IGNs (70.6% vs. 41.9%, p < 0.001). EUT-IGN was independently related with age < 60 (OR, 2.09; 95%CI, 1.03–4.26, p = 0.042), H. pylori (OR, 2.81; 95%CI, 1.20–6.63, p = 0.018), and absent/mild gastric atrophy (OR, 2.67; 95%CI, 1.25–5.72, p = 0.011). Overall and disease-specific survival were not significantly different between the two groups, however EUT-IGN tended to have short disease-specific survival (overall survival, p = 0.143; disease-specific survival, p = 0.083).ConclusionsUniform screening endoscopy with two-year interval seems not enough for rapid-growing gastric neoplasms, such as undifferentiated cancers. They tended to develop in adults younger than 60 with H. pylori infection without severe gastric atrophy. More meticulous screening, especially for proximal lesions is warranted for adults younger than 60 with H. pylori infection before development of gastric atrophy.

Risk for lymph node metastasis in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma with submucosal invasion.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVGC) has been reported to be associated with a low risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, the curative criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for submucosal EBVGC (pT1b-EBVGC) remain unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the risk factors for LNM in pT1b-EBVGC. This was a retrospective multicenter study at five institutes in Japan. We reviewed medical records and extracted all pT1b-EBVGC cases that met the following criteria: (i) histologically proven submucosal gastric cancer; (ii) surgical or endoscopic resection between January 2000 and December 2016; and (iii) presence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in tumor cells verified by EBV-encoded small RNA in situ hybridization (EBER-ISH). The association between clinicopathological factors and LNM were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. A total of 185 pT1b-EBVGC cases were included in the analysis. LNM was found in nine cases (4.9%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that lymphatic invasion (OR 9.1; 95% CI 2.1-46.1) and submucosal invasion ≥4000μm (OR 9.2; 95% CI 1.3-110.3) were significant risk factors for LNM. When we focused on pT1b-EBVGC without lymphatic invasion and with submucosal invasion <2000μm, the rate of LNM was 0% (0/96, 95% CI 0-3.8%). Our findings indicated that lymphatic invasion and submucosal invasion ≥4000μm were significant risk factors for LNM. ESD could be an appropriate option for pT1b-EBVGC without lymphatic invasion and with submucosal invasion <2000μm.

Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis and Feasibility of Endoscopic Treatment in Ulcerative Early Gastric Cancer

BackgroundWhen the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is considered minimal in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective alternative to radical resection. This study aims to estimate the feasibility of ESD for EGC with ulceration.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from 691 patients who underwent gastrectomy for EGC with ulceration. Subsequently, a stratification system for lesions was created based on the expanded ESD criteria, and the associations between the subgroups and the rate of LNM were analyzed.ResultsLNM was confirmed in 16.5% (114/691) of patients. Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, sex, tumor size, macroscopic features, depth of invasion, tumor differentiation, Lauren type, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion were associated with LNM. Multivariate analysis showed that LVI [odds ratio (OR) = 16.761, P < 0.001], SM1 invasion (OR = 2.159, P = 0.028), and SM2 invasion (OR = 3.230, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for LNM. LNM occurred in undifferentiated mucosal tumors, with ulceration being 1.7% (2/116) when the lesion was smaller than 20 mm. Further stratification revealed that among lesions < 30 mm in size, undifferentiated tumors with SM1 invasion had a higher rate of LNM and a lower disease-free survival rate than differentiated tumors with SM1 invasion and tumors limited to the mucosal layer.ConclusionsDepth of invasion and LVI were strongly associated with LNM in ulcerative EGC. Endoscopic resection may be applicable for undifferentiated mucosal ulcerative EGC < 30 mm in size, and additional investigation is needed to evaluate its safety.

Total length of positive resection margins can predict remnant gastric cancer following endoscopic submucosal dissection

BackgroundPrediction of remnant tumor is important in determining subsequent treatment options for gastric cancer patients with positive resection margin (RM) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). MethodsBased on the assumption that pathologic factors, including the length and type of involved RM, could potentially predict residual tumor, we evaluated 451 ESD specimens in patients with early gastric cancer. ResultsOf 408 cases, 37 (9.1 %) showed positive RMs. RM involvement in gastric cancer ESD specimens was associated with extended or beyond ESD criteria, greater tumor size, poor differentiation, submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and upper third location. Among the 37 positive RM cases, residual tumor was present in seven (18.9 %). The presence of residual tumor was not significantly associated with any clinicopathologic parameters except for tumor size and RM status. The total length of the involved RM was the most significant factor associated with the presence of residual tumor (P < 0.008). A total length cut-off value of 6 mm yielded a sensitivity of 85.7 % and negative predictive value of 94.7 % for predicting remnant tumor at gastrectomy following ESD. ConclusionsIn conclusion, when the ESD specimen exhibits positive RM, a quantitative assessment of the involved RM should be included in the pathology report, as this can help the clinician predict remnant tumor and determine appropriate future treatment.

The impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenocarcinomas in the United States

Recent studies show promise for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the United States, but do not identify the potential impact of ESD among newly diagnosed gastric cancers. We utilize the Veterans Health Administration to identify cancers suitable for ESD, to define the role of ESD in the United States. Retrospective cohort study using the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry to identify patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection from 1995 to 2018. TNM stage was used to categorize those who would meet absolute vs expanded indications for ESD. Primary outcome was lymph node status. Secondary analysis was performed with death as outcome. Of 12,584 primary gastric cancers, 4735 (37.6%) were nonmetastatic gastric adenocarcinomas. Median age at diagnosis was 70.3 years, 4676 (98.8%) male. Total 2306 (48.7%) underwent surgical resection, of which 636 (27.6%) were T1 lesions or cancer in situ. Of these, 44 (6.9%) met absolute indications for resection, 99 (15.6%) met established expanded criteria, and 98 (15.4%) may meet expanded criteria. Half of all tumors in each group were proximal in location. Rate of lymph node positivity was: 4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-15.5% in absolute group; 8.1%; 95% CI: 3.6-15.3% in expanded group; 13.3%; 95% CI: 7.3-21.6 in those potentially meeting expanded criteria. Lymph nodes positivity was associated with death (hazard ratio 1.49; 95% CI: 1.36-1.62, P < 0.001). Less than 10% of T1 or in situ cancers meet absolute criteria for ESD. Those that meet expanded criteria had higher risk for lymph node metastases, particularly proximal tumors. Future studies should evaluate the safety of ESD in proximal gastric tumors.

Tu1509 PRE-PROCEDURAL FEATURES FOR PREDICTING THE RISK OF LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN GASTRIC CANCER

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a curative method for some cases of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, there are still some patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after ESD because of lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk. If an accurate predicting for the risk of LNM before ESD is possible, appropriate treatment strategy could be established at the timing of decision for ESD. We aimed to investigate pre-procedural features for predicting the risk of LNM in EGC. We collected the data of 889 patients who underwent ESD for EGC. Patients with non-curative resection due to LNM, positive vertical margin, lymphovascular invasion, or submucosal invasion in undifferentiated-type and submucosal invasion over 500μm in differentiated-type were assigned as non-curative resection group (n=143). Among curative resection patients, undifferentiated-type limited to mucosa and differentiated-type with submucosal invasion limited to 500μm, were assigned as a control group (n=746). We analyzed endoscopic, radiologic, pathologic, single patient classifier (SPC) genes features about the risk of LNM. Radiologic feature is fold thickening or perigastric lymph node enlargement on CT. SPC genes (GZMB WARS, SFRP4) were known to be associated with prognosis of gastric cancer. A larger size (>20mm, P=0.002), elevated morphology (I&IIa, P=0.006), the presence of tumor erythema (P<0.001), white mucosal change (P=0.005), fold convergence (P<0.001) and abnormal finding at CT (P=0.002) were associated with the risk of LNM. Moderate differentiated adenocarcinoma (OR=2.07, P=0.003), poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (OR=4.08, P<0.001) were increased the risk of LNM than well differentiated adenocarcinoma. 11 patients (1.2%) identified LNM after additive surgery. Almost patients (9/11) with LNM showed intermediate to high risk based on SPC genes. Several pre-procedural features were associated with the risk of LNM. Therefore, considering these features in addition to existing ESD criteria may be helpful in providing patients with the best treatment option.