This study aims to identify and appraise orofacial pain assessment tools designed to score pain in adults who cannot self-report and rate their suitability for dental practice. A protocolled systematic scoping review, in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methods was completed. A development panel (n=7) reviewed attributes of each tool for suitability for use in dental practice, using predefined criteria. Nine studies were included. Sample size ranged from n=22 to n=348; all participants were 65 years plus and had a cognitive impairment or dementia, excluding controls.Four tools were identified: Facial action coding system (FACS), mobilization-observation-behavior-intensity in dementia pain scale (MOBID I & II) and, orofacial pain scale-non-verbal individuals (OPS-NVI).Tools scored between two and thirteen out of twenty according to modified quality assessment criteria. No tool was deemed suitable for use in dental surgery, with the OPS-NVI scoring most favorably. No tools were deemed ideal for use within a dental clinic. Elements of some, particularly the OPS-NVI, may be adaptable for this purpose. Despite the difficulties dental practitioners face trying to assess pain in non-speaking patients, there was no suitable tool identified. Pathways need to be designed to facilitate inclusive orofacial pain assessment for those who cannot self-report pain.
Read full abstract