Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire Research Articles

Psychometric Properties of the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder

ABSTRACT Credibility and expectancy are important aspects of therapy/treatment processes. We aimed to perform cross-cultural validation and examine the psychometric properties of the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). Ninety-one patients with opioid use disorder from Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drug Addiction Treatment Program were included in the study. Sociodemographic data form, CEQ, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Attitudes Toward Seeking Psychological Professional Help Scale-Short Form (ATSPPHS-SF) were filled out by participants. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that CEQ has two factors in our sample, similar to the original version. Reliability analyses showed that CEQ has a high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Regarding convergent validity results, CEQ was correlated with ATSPPHS-SF. No significant correlation was found between CEQ and BDI and STAI regarding discriminant validity results. In conclusion, the Turkish version of CEQ is a valid, reliable scale and could be used in patients with opioid use disorder. In patients with opioid use disorder, we contributed to the addiction literature by adapting a short and effective survey that measures trust and expectation.

Feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of remote-delivered abbreviated mindfulness-based cognitive therapy interventions for patients with migraine and depressive symptoms.

This study was an open-label single-arm clinical trial evaluating the fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and clinical signal of abbreviated mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT-brief) delivered either via telephone (MBCT-T) or by video conferencing (MBCT-V) for people with migraine and comorbid depressive symptoms. Migraine is commonly comorbid with elevated depressive symptoms. MBCT reduces depressive symptoms and shows promise to reduce migraine-related disability. An abbreviated and remotely delivered version of MBCT could increase access to care. People with migraine and elevated depressive symptoms were recruited from a large urban health system. Participants were assigned in blocks of eight to receive an evidence-based MBCT-brief treatment, including eight weekly group classes and home practice delivered via telephone (MBCT-T) or video (MBCT-V); MBCT-T was randomly selected for the first block. Sessions were recorded and coded for treatment fidelity. Feasibility was assessed via session attendance (primary), homework completion, recruitment rate, and survey completion rate. Acceptability was assessed via the eight-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; primary), the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), the System Usability Scale (SUS), and items assessing survey acceptability. Participants completed the Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16-item (QIDS-SR16) at baseline, mid-treatment, and post-treatment. Feasibility and acceptability rates were compared to a priori benchmarks. Participants (n = 16) were all female with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 45 (13) years, the majority of whom identified as White (13/16, 81%) and non-Hispanic (14/16, 88%). The intervention met the a priori criteria set for therapist fidelity to treatment protocol (mean [SD] MBCT-Treatment Acceptability and Competence Scale Adherence score 2.9 [0.2]), feasibility (mean [SD] session attendance was 7.9/8 [0.3]), and acceptability (mean [SD] CSQ-8 score 28.8 [3.3]) for the entire sample and for each treatment arm. The usability of the remote-delivery system was high across study participants (mean [SD] SUS score 84.8 [11.0]). Survey procedures were broadly deemed acceptable, with at least 80% participants either endorsing "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" across all items. Using Wilcoxon tests, we observed significant reductions in both the HDI (pre-treatment median [interquartile range] score 63 [40, 70] vs. post-treatment 36 [26, 54], p = 0.004) and the QIDS-SR16 (pre-treatment median [interquartile range] score 8 [5, 13] vs. post-treatment 4 [3, 6], p = 0.003). We found that remotely delivered MBCT-brief for migraine and depressive symptoms was feasible and acceptable to patients in both the telephone and video modalities. Intervention was associated with significant post-treatment reductions in headache-related disability and depressive symptomatology, findings that must be interpreted cautiously in the absence of a control group.

Improved Functioning and Activity According to the International Classification of Functioning and Disability after Multidisciplinary Telerehabilitation for Post-COVID-19 Condition-A Randomized Control Study.

This study investigates the outcomes and feasibility concerning the functioning and activity of multidisciplinary group telerehabilitation for a post-COVID-19 condition. Recruitment for the group rehabilitation was announced three times during 2021 and 2022 through the COVID-19 patient organization in Sweden. The key inclusion criteria were remaining symptoms and functional impairments beyond 12 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection; medical assessment and treatment regarding comorbidities or new postinfection symptoms; the ability to use the Internet. Participants were randomized into a rehabilitation group or onto a waiting list using an Internet program. Multiple outcomes included self-scored questionnaires and physical tests before and after eight weeks, and at six months follow-up. Here, we present the self-scored outcomes on the International Classification of Functioning and Disability questionnaire (ICF, 22 body functions and 16 activity/participation categories) and breathing scales. Of the 164 participants who registered for the study, 67 (mean age 43, 78% women) participated in an eight-week group rehabilitation compared to 42 who served as waiting list controls (mean age 47, 88% women). At six months follow-up, 60 participants from the rehabilitation group and 21 from the waiting list completed the data. The results indicate that a larger number of ICF body functions and activity/participation categories had improved in the rehabilitation group after eight weeks and six months. Overall credibility, as assessed by the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire, was high, and the attrition rate in rehabilitation was low. The results indicate beneficial outcomes for multidisciplinary telerehabilitation in people suffering from a post-COVID-19 condition. Therefore, rehabilitation interventions should be further developed and implemented in clinical practice.

Treatment credibility as a mechanism of change in cognitive behavioral therapy: Effects on depression and anxiety.

This study aimed to provide evidence for treatment credibility (TC) as a potential mechanism of change in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Therefore, it focused on within-person effects that are free of the influence of stable characteristics and thus allow to exclude certain alternative explanations for the association under study. The sample included 1,423 patients receiving outpatient CBT, who presented a wide variety of psychiatric diagnoses (mostly affective and anxiety disorders). TC, depression, and anxiety were measured every fifth session from Session 5 to 25 using the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Symptom severity was assessed every session using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-11. Within- and between-person effects of TC, depression, and anxiety were analyzed using the latent curve model with structured residuals (LCM-SRs). In exploratory analyses, within-person effects of TC on next-session symptom severity were assessed using a modification of the LCM-SR. LCM-SRs exhibited excellent fit in main analyses. There were significant negative correlations of both intercepts and slopes (between-person level) of CEQ and PHQ-9 as well GAD-7. No significant cross-lagged effects (within-person level) were found over the five-session interval. However, session-wise analyses revealed significant cross-lagged effects of CEQ on Hopkins Symptom Checklist-11. This study is the first to find significant within-person effects of TC in session-wise analyses. This lends preliminary support to the notion of TC as a mechanism of change. The lack of significant findings at the five-session interval is discussed considering the specific design used in this study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Poster 235: The Role of Symptom Duration in Shaping Outcome Expectations of Patients Initiating Nonoperative Treatment for Meniscal Tear

Objectives: Nonoperative treatment represents a safe, guideline-based approach for meniscal injuries, but it is unclear why or how it works. It is often assumed that nonoperative treatments (e.g., physical therapy) exerts their effects (e.g., symptom relief) via technical procedures (e.g., exercise regimen) but a variety of nonspecific factors (e.g., expectations for treatment and its credibility) commonly part of any treatment (e.g., physical therapy, surgery, pharmacotherapy, behavior therapy, etc.) also influence outcomes. In general, patients who believe a treatment is believable, convincing or logical (credibility) and will be useful for relieving the symptoms for which they seek treatment (outcome expectancy) are more likely to achieve clinically meaningful change than patients with negative expectancies. Patients with low treatment credibility and outcome expectancies not only may be less likely to achieve treatment goals but may also be at greater risk for dropout. Despite evidence supporting their role in pharmacotherapy and behavior therapy, little research has been carried out in understanding the role of treatment credibility and expectancies in shaping successful treatment of rehabilitative treatments for meniscal tears. Utilizing baseline data collected from the Treatment of Meniscal Tears in Osteoarthritis trial we sought to assess treatment credibility and treatment expectancies for improvement of knee symptoms and their clinical and sociodemographic correlates. Given the strong influences of cognitive processes on pain as it persists, our a priori hypothesis was that expectations for symptom improvement would be greater for patients with shorter duration of knee symptoms than those with persistent knee symptoms. Methods: Participants included 126 patients (58 years old (range: 45-75), 51% women, 91% white) who rated credibility of treatment to which they were assigned and expectations for symptom improvement using a modified version of the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ-Meniscus Treatment) based on a psychometrically validated measure two weeks post randomization. Ratings were obtained after rationale for treatment was provided but before the full scope of therapy was implemented so as not to contaminate them by treatment response. Credibility ratings were calculated by taking the mean of the first three items of the CEQ to create an overall credibility rating (9-point scale). We adopted the practice of measuring expectancy by using the CEQ-MT that asks patients to rate, on a 0 to 100% scale (in 10-point increments), “By the end of treatment, how much improvement in knee symptoms do you think will occur?” We also examined expectancy items from the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Scale (MODEMS) that assess pretreatment expectations for relief of knee symptoms and their impact on activities of living (e.g., housework, sleep). Each item had a possible range of 1 (not likely) to 5 (extremely likely). Overall MODEMS symptom expectancy scores were calculated by taking the mean of the first 5 items. Results: Ninety-three percent of the participants completed the survey. On the CEQ-MT, average treatment credibility (Mean = 6.5) and expectancy ratings (Mean = 70%) were high. Similarly, the MODEMS expectancies were high, on average (Mean = 4.0). Expectancies for improvement and the extent to which treatment was deemed credible moderately correlated with each other ( r range 0.30 - 0.52, p<.05). Credibility but not outcome expectancy varied by race, with participants identifying as white reporting higher treatment average credibility scores, 5.2 and 6.5, p=.03, respectively. Credibility scores did not vary by knee pain duration. Patients experiencing knee pain for 0-2 months (i.e., acute) expected, on average, that a 76% improvement would occur by the end of therapy, compared with 64% for patients experiencing pain persisting 3 months and longer (i.e., chronic), p=.002. Similarly, mean MODEMS expectancy scores varied by pain duration, with acute patients reporting stronger expectancies of symptom reduction than their chronic counterparts (4.2 and 3.8, p=.002). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study that has sought to assess systematically baseline levels of perceived treatment credibility and expectations for improvement in a cohort of patient undergoing nonoperative therapy for meniscus tears. Our primary findings are treatment credibility varied by race and that treatment outcome expectancies differed significantly by pain duration (acute vs chronic). Understanding beliefs patients have about treatment is a clinically relevant research focus because they are among the most powerful “common factors” (i.e., those that are not specific to any one treatment but are shared across all) that can influence treatment outcomes above and beyond technical components of a therapy. Their role in contributing to the management of meniscus tear is unknown. Data from this study suggest that common factors such as treatment expectancy may be particularly operative in patients whose knee symptoms following meniscus injuries persists beyond the acute phase.

Placebo hypoalgesic and nocebo hyperalgesic effects in post-extraction patients-A cross sectional study.

Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that affects people's physical, mental, and social health. Patients at times present with postoperative pain with no clinical signs after the surgical dental procedures and adequate pharmacological management. This can be due to the amplified emotional component of the individual in their postoperative period. Hence, this study aimed to estimate the association between placebo, nocebo effects, and postoperative pain associated with tooth extraction procedures. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 301 patients attending the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for tooth extraction. Preoperatively, the expected postoperative pain score was recorded using the "Numerical Rating Scale" (NRS), Anxiety and Depression were assessed using the "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" (HADS), and Patients' expectancy regarding the treatment outcome was assessed using the "Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire" (CEQ). Observed postoperative pain scores at the 6th hour, 24th hour, and peak pain score of the day were recorded using the NRS. There were statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) found between expected and observed postoperative pain, preoperative anxiety and observed postoperative pain, preoperative depression and observed postoperative pain, placebo, nocebo effects, and observed postoperative pain. Our study showed a strong association between these variables suggesting that post-extraction pain is a multifaceted condition wherein pain expectation, preoperative anxiety, depression, and expectancy regarding the treatment outcome should be scrutinized before the extraction procedure.

Feasibility of Superimposed Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to the Gluteus Medius During a Resistance Training Program.

Gluteus medius (GMed) weakness is a common impairment seen across multiple lower-extremity pathologies. Greater GMed weakness is moderately associated with greater frontal plane motion, often termed dynamic knee valgus during functional tasks which may increase risk of lower-extremity injury. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) superimposed to targeted muscles has emerged in clinical practice; however, NMES superimposed to the GMed in unknown. It is essential to assess the safety, credibility, and expectancy of NMES superimposed to the GMed prior to implementation in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility, safety, credibility, and expectancy of improvement with a 2-week intervention with or without NMES to the GMed in females with dynamic knee valgus. Feasibility study. A total of 22 adult females with dynamic knee valgus (age = 21.8 [1.4]y, mass = 76.9 [18.8]kg, height = 1.7 [0.1]m) completed a 2-week intervention with NMES or a sham treatment superimposed to the GMed during all therapeutic exercises. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and completion rate, while safety was assessed by the total number of adverse events. Treatment credibility and expectancy was assessed with the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire. Mixed-measure analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis (P ≤ .05). Recruitment was completed in 5months with 100% completion rate and no adverse events. There was no difference in treatment credibility between groups (NMES = 23.7 [2.3], sham = 21.7 [3.4], P = .12); however, the NMES group demonstrated a greater expectancy score (NMES = 20.0 [3.8], sham = 15.9 [5.1], P = .045). Resistance training with NMES superimposed to the GMed is a feasible and safe intervention that resulted in greater expectance of success. Clinicians may consider superimposing NMES to the gluteal muscles when addressing muscle weakness in individuals with dynamic knee valgus.

The impact of psychosocial variables on initial presentation and surgical outcome for ulnar-sided wrist pathology: a cohort study with 1-year follow-up

AimsUlnar-sided wrist pain has historically been equated to lower-back pain of wrist surgery. Little is known about the relationship between psychosocial profile and the manifestation of ulnar-sided wrist pathology and their treatment outcomes. This study aimed to determine the impact of pain catastrophising, psychological distress, illness perception, and patients’ outcome expectations on patient-reported pain and hand function before and one year after surgery for ulnar-sided wrist pathology.Patients and MethodsWe included patients who underwent surgical treatment for ulnar-sided wrist pathology. Before surgery, patients completed the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), and Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). Pain and dysfunction were assessed before (n = 423) and one year after surgery (n = 253) using the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE). Hierarchical linear regression was used to assess the relationship between psychosocial factors and the preoperative PRWHE score, postoperative PRWHE score, and change in PRWHE.ResultsPsychosocial variables explained an additional 35% of the variance in preoperative PRWHE scores and 18% on postoperative scores. A more negative psychosocial profile was associated with higher (worse) preoperative PRWHE scores (PCS: B = 0.19, CI = [0.02–0.36]; B-IPQ Consequences: B = 3.26, CI = 2.36–4.15; and B-IPQ Identity, B = 1.88 [1.09–2.67]) and postoperative PRWHE scores (PCS: B = 0.44, CI = [0.08–0.81]) but not with the change in PRWHE after surgery. Higher treatment expectations were associated with a lower (better) postoperative PRWHE score (CEQ expectancy: B = -1.63, CI = [-2.43;-0.83]) and a larger change in PRWHE scores (B =|1.62|, CI = [|0.77; 2.47|]).ConclusionA more negative psychosocial profile was associated with higher pain levels and dysfunction preoperatively and postoperatively. However, these patients showed similar improvement as patients with a more feasible psychosocial profile. Therefore, patients should not be withheld from surgical treatment based on their preoperative psychosocial profile alone. Boosting treatment expectations might further improve treatment outcomes.Level of evidenceIII (Cohort study).

Acceptability and Feasibility of the Transfer of Face-to-Face Group Therapy to Online Group Chats in a Psychiatric Outpatient Setting During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Observational Study.

BackgroundAt the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, several mental health care providers were obliged to shut down outpatient services, including group therapy and psychoeducational sessions. The lockdown in many countries is a serious threat to people’s mental well-being, especially for individuals with severe mental illnesses. Discontinued outpatient treatments and disruption of daily routines are considered to be risk factors for destabilization of patients with mental illness.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptability, usability, and feasibility of a group chat program to replace cancelled face-to-face group sessions in an outpatient psychiatric department.MethodsParticipants (N=33) were recruited in the outpatient department of a large university medical center in Leipzig, Germany. Former face-to-face group participants were invited to take part in a therapist-guided group-chat for 4 weeks (8 sessions) and were asked to evaluate the program via self-administered standardized questionnaires at baseline (T0, preintervention), after every chat session (T1), and posttreatment (T2, after 4-6 weeks). The chat groups were specific to the following mental disorder diagnoses and based on the same therapeutic principles and techniques as the former face-to-face groups: anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Sociodemographic measures, attitudes toward the COVID-19 pandemic, depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), quality of life (abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment), treatment credibility/expectancy (Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire), and participants’ satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 [ZUF-8]) were measured.ResultsParticipants joined an average of 5 out of 8 offered chat sessions. Participation rates in the respective groups were highest in the ADHD group (8.6/11, 78%) and lowest in the anxiety group (3.7/9, 41%). The overall preintervention level of depressive symptoms was moderate and showed a slight, nonsignificant improvement at posttreatment (T0: mean 10.7, SD 5.5; T2: mean 10.2, SD 5.5). A similar result was observed regarding quality of life (T0: median 41.7-68.8; T2: median 50-70.3). Treatment credibility and expectancy scores were medium-high (T0: meancredibility 18.1, SD 3.8; meanexpectancy 11.2, SD 5.1; T2: meancredibility 17.1, SD 4.8; meanexpectancy 10.3, SD 5.8). Further, significant correlations were detected between posttreatment expectancy score and posttreatment PHQ-9 score (r=–0.41, P=.02), posttreatment physical quality of life (r=0.54, P=.001), and posttreatment psychological quality of life (r=0.53, P=.002). Overall, participants’ satisfaction with the program was very high, both after chat sessions and at posttreatment (ZUF-8: mean score 20.6, SD 1.0). Of all participants, a majority (27/31, 87%) rated the program as excellent/good and indicated they would recommend the group chat program to a friend in need of similar help (23/31, 74%).ConclusionsA therapist-guided group chat program to substitute outpatient group setting treatment during the COVID-19 lockdown was shown to be feasible, usable, and highly acceptable for participants. Web-based programs such as this one provide an easy-to-implement tool to successfully stabilize participants during a difficult time, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00021527; https://tinyurl.com/3btyxc2r

Portuguese validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in routine practice.

This study aimed to validate and explore the psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire (CEQ) for the Portuguese population in the context of routine practice. The sample includes 87 clients from a university psychotherapy clinic. All clients completed self-report measures to assess credibility and expectation (CEQ), as well as measures of general mental health, depressive symptoms and therapeutic alliance in session 1 and session 2. The exploratory analysis revealed the existence of two factors in CEQ for the Portuguese population, factor 1 credibility and factor 2 expectation. The measure demonstrated good internal consistency, test-retest reliability and good adjustment in the confirmatory analysis. In terms of convergent validity, no significant correlation was found between credibility and expectation and the therapeutic alliance. The results corroborate the CEQ psychometric qualities for the Portuguese population, also showing its applicability in a context of routine practice.

Induction of Efficacy Expectancies in an Ambulatory Smartphone-Based Digital Placebo Mental Health Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundThere is certain evidence on the efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions. However, the mechanisms of action remain unclear. Placebo effects contribute to the efficacy of face-to-face mental health interventions and may also be a potential mechanism of action in smartphone-based interventions.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether different types of efficacy expectancies as potential factors underlying placebo effects could be successfully induced in a smartphone-based digital placebo mental health intervention, ostensibly targeting mood and stress.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, controlled, single-blinded, superiority trial with a multi-arm parallel design. Participants underwent an Android smartphone-based digital placebo mental health intervention for 20 days. We induced prospective efficacy expectancies via initial instructions on the purpose of the intervention and retrospective efficacy expectancies via feedback on the success of the intervention at days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13. A total of 132 healthy participants were randomized to a prospective expectancy–only condition (n=33), a retrospective expectancy–only condition (n=33), a combined expectancy condition (n=34), or a control condition (n=32). As the endpoint, we assessed changes in efficacy expectancies with the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire, before the intervention and on days 1, 7, 14, and 20. For statistical analyses, we used a random effects model for the intention-to-treat sample, with intervention day as time variable and condition as two factors: prospective expectancy (yes vs no) and retrospective expectancy (yes vs no), allowed to vary over participant and intervention day.ResultsCredibility (β=−1.63; 95% CI −2.37 to −0.89; P<.001) and expectancy (β=−0.77; 95% CI −1.49 to −0.05; P=.04) decreased across the intervention days. For credibility and expectancy, we found significant three-way interactions: intervention day×prospective expectancy×retrospective expectancy (credibility: β=2.05; 95% CI 0.60-3.50; P=.006; expectancy: β=1.55; 95% CI 0.14-2.95; P=.03), suggesting that efficacy expectancies decreased least in the combined expectancy condition and the control condition.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first empirical study investigating whether efficacy expectancies can be successfully induced in a specifically designed placebo smartphone-based mental health intervention. Our findings may pave the way to diminish or exploit digital placebo effects and help to improve the efficacy of digital mental health interventions.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02365220; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02365220.

Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial on SISU, a software agent providing a brief self-help intervention for adults with low psychological well-being

IntroductionOnly a minority of people living with mental health problems are getting professional help. As digitalisation moves on, the possibility of providing internet/mobile-based interventions (IMIs) arises. One type of IMIs...

Patient Mindset and the Success of Carpal Tunnel Release.

Depression and pain catastrophizing are aspects of the patient's mindset that have been shown to be important in relation to the outcome of carpal tunnel release. However, other factors of the patient's mindset have been understudied, such as treatment expectations and illness perceptions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of these mindset aspects on outcome of carpal tunnel release, in addition to psychological distress and pain catastrophizing. A total of 307 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who visited outpatient hand surgery clinics and who completed online questionnaires regarding demographic and psychosocial characteristics and carpal tunnel syndrome severity were included. The patient mindset was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire, and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the relation between self-reported severity 6 months after carpal tunnel release, as measured with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and psychosocial aspects of mindset, adjusting for preoperative Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score, patient characteristics, and comorbidities. Independent associations with better self-reported outcome were found for higher treatment expectations (β = -0.202; p < 0.001) and illness comprehensibility (β = -0.223; p < 0.001). The additional explained variance in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores by the patient's mindset was 13.2 percent (psychological distress and pain catastrophizing together, 2.1 percent; treatment expectations and illness perceptions together, 11.1 percent). Treatment outcome expectations and comprehensibility of illness are both independently associated with the outcome of carpal tunnel release, showing the importance of these aspects of the patient's mindset for the outcome of carpal tunnel release. Risk, III.

Open-Label Placebo Treatment: Outcome Expectations and General Acceptance in the Lay Population

BackgroundMost physicians sometimes apply therapies without specific active ingredients. Although patients seem to judge such placebo treatments as acceptable under certain circumstances, deception is still an ethical problem. Open-label placebos (OLPs) might be a promising approach to solve this dilemma. This study compared general acceptance and outcome expectations of OLPs and deceptive placebos (DPs).MethodsIn an experimental online study, 814 participants read a case vignette of a person with insomnia receiving a pill. The participants were then randomly allocated into two groups, where the second part of the vignette described the pill as either a deceptive placebo (DP group) or as an open-label placebo (OLP group). The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) assessed outcome expectations after the first (pre-assessment) and the second (post-assessment) parts of the vignette. Treatment acceptance was measured at post-assessment. Data from 798 participants were analyzed by a mixed multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), t-tests, and post-hoc mediation analyses.ResultsThe MANOVA revealed a significant group main effect and a significant time × group interaction effect. At post-assessment, outcome expectations were higher in the DP group than in the OLP group. Acceptance of the placebo treatment was also higher in the DP group than in the OLP group. Mediation analyses confirmed that higher acceptance in the DP group was mediated by higher expectations.ConclusionsWhen laypersons read about placebo treatment, their outcome expectations toward DPs were higher than toward OLPs. Surprisingly, the application of DPs was rated as more acceptable than OLPs. This result might be explained by indirect effects of treatment expectations.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. Further insights into the measured concepts and their relationships

IntroductionTreatment credibility and patient expectancy of improvement have been increasingly considered in clinical research. ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to carry out the cross-cultural validation of a French-language version of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire (CEQ), to further document the psychometric properties of the CEQ, and to add to the empirical data concerning the concepts of credibility and expectancy. MethodsThe process followed up-to-date guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation and included extensive psychometric validation. Accurate translation and cross-cultural equivalence of the questionnaire's basic concepts were assessed by a multidisciplinary expert committee. Reliability and validity were evaluated in a cohort of 209 consecutive patients referred to health psychologists for psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. ResultsThe French CEQ was found to be well understood and acceptable. It demonstrated excellent reproducibility, consistency and factorial validity, confirming the 2-factor model separating credibility from expectancy of the original CEQ. The use of modern measurement methods indicated that the CEQ scales satisfy the important characteristics of unidimensionality and invariance across age and gender. ConclusionThe French CEQ can be used for French-speaking populations in various studies to evaluate both credibility and expectancy for improvement. However, the questionnaire's sensitivity to change should be further confirmed before it can be safely used in longitudinal studies. The study also confirms the close relation between credibility and expectancy but substantiates differences large enough to justify separate measurement of the two components of the questionnaire.

Patients' outcome expectations and their fulfilment in multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation.

Patients' expectations of the outcomes of rehabilitation may influence the outcomes and satisfaction with treatment. For stroke patients in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, we aimed to explore patients' outcome expectations and their fulfilment as well as determinants. The Stroke Cohort Outcomes of REhabilitation (SCORE) study included consecutive stroke patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility after hospitalisation. Outcome expectations were assessed at the start of rehabilitation (admission) by using the three-item Expectancy scale (sum score range 3-27) of the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). After rehabilitation, patients answered the same questions formulated in the past tense to assess fulfilment of expectations. Baseline patient characteristics were recorded and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) was measured at baseline and after rehabilitation. The number of patients with expectations unfulfilled or fulfilled or exceeded was computed by subtracting the admission and discharge CEQ Expectancy scores. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with outcome expectations and their fulfilment, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 165 patients (96 males [58.2%], mean (SD) age 60.2 years [12.7]) who completed the CEQ Expectancy instrument at admission (median score 21.6, interquartile range [IQR] 17.0-24.0); 79 completed it both at admission (median score 20.6, IQR 16.6-24.4) and follow-up (median score 20.0, IQR 16.4-22.8). For 40 (50.6%) patients, expectations of therapy were fulfilled or exceeded. No patient characteristic at admission was associated with baseline CEQ Expectancy score. Odds of expectation fulfilment were associated with low expectations at admission (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.83) and improved EQ-5D score (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-0.75). In half of the stroke patients in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, expectations were fulfilled or exceeded, most likely in patients with low expectations at admission and with improved health-related quality of life. More research into the role of health professionals regarding the measurement, shaping and management of outcome expectations is needed.

Patients' pre-operative general and specific outcome expectations predict postoperative pain and function after total knee and total hip arthroplasties.

Background and aims Previous studies have suggested there is an association between preoperative expectations about the outcome and outcomes of total knee and total hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA). However, expectations have been rarely examined on their clinical relevance relative to other well-known predictive factors. Furthermore expectations can be measured on a more generic level (e.g. does one expect their symptoms to improve after surgery) or on a more specific level (e.g. does one expect to be able to squat again after surgery). Aim of this study was to examine whether patients' general and specific preoperative outcome expectations predict function and pain 12-months after TKA/THA, when assessed as one of the candidate predictive variables alongside other relevant clinical and sociodemographic variables. Moreover, we explored whether a more generic or a more specific assessment of expectations would better predict outcome. Methods A prospective cohort study on consecutive TKA/THA patients, with assessments done preoperatively and 12-months postoperative. Primary outcomes were the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) activities of daily living (ADL) and pain subscale scores at 12-months. The pain subscales consist of nine-(KOOS) and 10-(HOOS) items and the ADL of 17 items. Patients' preoperative outcome expectations were measured with the credibility expectancy questionnaire (CEQ), which contains three items scored on a 0-9 scale and sum score 0-27 and the Hospital for Special Surgery expectations surveys (HSS expectation surveys) for 17(TKA) or 18(THA) outcomes on 0-4 scale. Other candidate predictors: preoperative pain and function as measured with HOOS/KOOS, sex, age, education level, body mass index, Kellgren/Lawrence score, preoperative mental health and treatment credibility as measured with CEQ. Eight prediction models were constructed using multivariate linear regression analysis with a backward selection procedure. Results The 146 TKA patients included in this study had a mean age of 66.9 years (SD 9.2) and 69% was female. The 148 THA patients had a mean age 67.2 (SD 9.5) and 57% was female. Mean outcomes: postoperative HOOS-ADL 84.3 (SD 16.6), pain 88.2 (SD 15.4), KOOS-ADL 83.9 (SD 15.8) and pain 83.6 (SD 17.1). CEQ-expectancy median was in THA 23 (IQR 21;24) and TKA 23 (IQR 20;24). HSS-expectation surveys function was for THA 21.0 (18.0;24.0) and 19.0 (14.0;22.0) in TKA. Patients' outcome expectations were consistently part of the combination of variables that best predicted outcomes for both TKA/THA 1-year post-operatively. Expectations alone explained between 17.0 and 30.3% of the variance in outcomes. The CEQ expectancy subscale explained more variance of postoperative function in TKA and of function and pain in THA as compared to the HSS expectation surveys. Conclusions In planning of surgical treatment, orthopedic surgeons should take a range of variables into account of which the patient's expectations about outcome of surgery is one. The CEQ expectancy subscale predicted outcomes slightly better as the HSS expectation surveys, but differences in predictive value of the two measurements were too small to prefer between the two. Future studies are advised to replicate these findings and externally validate the models presented.

Working alliance with an avatar: How far can we go with internet interventions?

ObjectiveTo examine the working alliance between users and an avatar and users' treatment expectations in an unguided Internet intervention for the treatment of insomnia. MethodsThe sample included participants from the treatment condition (N = 29) of a randomised controlled trial. The task and goal subscales of the Working Alliance Inventory Short Revised (WAI-SR) were applied in week three. Five items of the Bern Post-Session Report and one question about the extent to which users had missed a human therapist were administered after each session. Treatment expectations were measured with the Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was used as the primary outcome measure. ResultsThe mean scores for the WAI-SR task and goal subscales were relatively high (M = 3.24, SD = 0.79; M = 3.16, SD = 0.91, respectively). The mean score of the five Bern Post-Session Report items remained stable over time, but some users increasingly indicated that they missed a real therapist over the course of the intervention, with a strong linear effect (t(87) = 3.16, p < 0.01). ISI chance score was predicted by the mean score of the Bern Post-Session Report (b = −0.3.83, t(21.80) = −2.97, p < 0.01), missing a human therapist (b = −0.0.13, t(20.47) = −2.72, p = 0.01) and the CEQ (b = 0.18, t(19.03) = −2.69, p = 0.01), but not by WAI-SR task and goal subscales. ConclusionsResults indicate that users established a working alliance with the avatar. The affective bond remained stable over time, but towards the end of the intervention some users indicated that they missed having a human therapist. Affective bond and missing a real therapist predicted symptom change.

Feasibility of a cognitive strategy training intervention for people with Parkinson’s disease

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of a novel client-centered cognitive strategy training intervention for people with Parkinson’s disease (PD).Materials and methods: This was a case series of seven people with PD without dementia but with subjective cognitive decline. The intervention involved ≥5 treatment sessions at the participant’s home. Participant acceptance and engagement were assessed by the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), enjoyment and effort ratings, and homework completion. Logistical information was tracked, and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was an exploratory outcome measure. Data analysis was descriptive.Results: CEQ scores were positive and increased over time. CSQ scores were high (M = 30.8, SD = 0.75), with all participants rating all items positively. Almost all (95%) effort and enjoyment ratings were ≥3 (Much), and homework completion rates averaged 84% (SD = 18). Intervention duration was 6–15 weeks (M = 9.2, SD = 2.8), with treatment sessions averaging 1.7 h (SD = 0.5). Group and most individual COPM ratings improved ≥2 points.Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of the intervention for people with PD. It was acceptable, engaging, and promising in terms of its effect on self-identified functional cognitive problems.Implications for RehabilitationPeople with Parkinson’s disease (PD) without dementia can experience cognitive decline that negatively impacts function and quality of life.Strategy-based interventions that explicitly train for transfer may mitigate the negative functional consequences of cognitive decline in this population.We developed a client-centered cognitive strategy training intervention for people with PD. This small case series supports its feasibility, indicating that it is acceptable and engaging for people with PD and promising in terms of its effect on self-identified functional cognitive problems.

Motivation, expectations, and usability of a driven gait orthosis in stroke patients and their therapists

Background: In the development of efficacious driven gait orthoses (DGO), it is an added value to consider patients’ and therapists’ perspectives concerning robot-assisted gait training (RAGT). A better understanding of these issues may improve the process of care and outcome.Objectives: This study aimed to examine stroke patients’ motivation and expectations of RAGT, and therapists’ expectations and perspectives on the usability of RAGT. Additionally, the differences in expectations between stroke patients and their therapists were analyzed.Methods: A cross sectional, multi-center, three-group trial was conducted. Included were (1) stroke patients who have experience with RAGT (i.e. the stroke user group), (2) stroke patients who have no experience with RAGT (i.e. the stroke non-user group), and (3) therapists who have experience with RAGT (i.e. the therapist user group). The Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), and Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use Questionnaire (USE) were used. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were conducted.Results: In total, 46 subjects were assessed (stroke user group: n = 23, stroke non-user group: n = 14, therapist user group: n = 9). IMI subscale scores ranged from 42 to 88%. Mean credibility and expectancy ranged from 80 to 85% and 57 to 72%, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. USE subscale scores ranged from 61 to 72%.Conclusions: Stroke user group patients seem quite motivated to train with the DGO and both patients and therapists reasonably believe that this training could improve gait functioning. Therapists are moderately satisfied with the usability of the DGO, but there is room for improvement with respect to usefulness and ease of use.