Coxib Users Research Articles

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Incident Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

The association between the development of heart failure (HF) and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is not well established. Use of NSAIDs may increase the risk of incident HF. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that reported odds ratio, relative risk, hazard ratio, or standardized incidence ratio comparing risk of incident HF in NSAID users vs nonusers. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all NSAIDs and both subclasses (conventional NSAIDs and highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors [COXIBs]) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method. Seven studies with 7,543,805 participants were identified and included in our data analysis. Use of NSAIDs was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing HF, with a pooled RR of 1.17 (95% CI: 1.01-1.36). Subgroup analysis showed a significantly elevated risk among users of conventional NSAIDs (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15-1.57) but not users of COXIBs (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.16). A significantly elevated risk of incident HF was observed among users of NSAIDs.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been assigned a promising role in the chemoprevention of various malignancies. However, epidemiological data on the association between NSAID use and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) are limited. To explore whether patients regularly exposed to systemic NSAIDs are at a reduced risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), we conducted a population-based case-control analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a United Kingdom primary care database. We identified 65,398 patients with incident BCC and 7,864 patients with incident SCC diagnosed between 1995 and 2013 and matched 1 and 4 NMSC-free controls to each BCC and SCC case, respectively, on age, sex, general practice, calendar time and years of history in the database. We compared prior NSAID exposure between cases and controls using multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses controlling for several potential confounders. Overall, we found no association between NSAID use and BCC, but when looking exclusively at users of single NSAID substances there was a suggestion of a reduced BCC risk in regular users of aspirin and ibuprofen (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR]: 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.99 and adj. OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.78, respectively). The risk of SCC was slightly decreased in regular users of any NSAIDs (adj. OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.97), with the strongest risk reduction observed in current users of coxibs (adj. OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.62-0.95). These findings provide evidence that patients predisposed to NMSC might benefit from chemoprevention with NSAIDs.

Cyclo‐oxygenase‐2 inhibitors or nonselective NSAIDs plus gastroprotective agents: what to prescribe in daily clinical practice?

Two strategies for prevention of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) events for nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (nsNSAID) users are replacement of the nsNSAID by a cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor (coxib) or co-prescription of a gastroprotective agent (GPA). To identify whether and in whom either of these strategies should be preferred in daily practice. A nested case-control study was conducted using three European primary care databases. We selected a cohort including all naive nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% GPA adherence) and coxib users (without GPA use) aged ≥50 years. Cases with an UGI event (i.e. symptomatic UGI ulcer or bleeding) were matched to cohort members without an UGI event on age, sex and number of individual UGI risk factors (i.e. UGI event history, age ≥65 years, concomitant use of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or glucocorticoids) and calendar time. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI, while adjusting for potential confounders. Within the NSAID cohort (n = 617,220), 398 UGI cases were identified. The risk of UGI events was equivalent for coxib and nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% adherence) users (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 0.77-1.37). In concurrent glucocorticoid users, the risk of UGI events was significantly elevated for nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% adherence) compared with coxib users (OR: 9.01; 95%CI: 1.61-50.50). The risk of UGI events was similar in nsNSAID+GPA (≥80% adherence) and coxibs users. In patients concurrently using glucocorticoids, a significant increase in the risk of UGI events for nsNSAID+GPA users was observed and coxibs should be preferred.

Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and venous thromboembolism in women

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and risks might differ by type of NSAID. Compared with men, women have a higher incidence of VTE at younger age, and they more often use NSAIDs. To assess risks of VTE in young and middle-aged women in association with use of NSAIDs. In a nationwide case–control study (Thrombo Embolism Hormone Study) performed in Sweden 2003–2009, we included as cases 1433 women, 18 to 64 years of age with a first time VTE. Controls were 1402 randomly selected women, frequency matched by age. Information was obtained by telephone interviews and DNA analyses of blood samples. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for degree of immobilization, chronic disease, smoking, body mass index, use of hormonal contraception, hormone therapy or other NSAIDs. Use of NSAIDs was not associated with increased risks of VTE (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.80–1.19). The OR was 0.88 for propionic acid derivatives (95% CI 0.72–1.10), 1.18 for acetic acid derivatives (95% CI 0.82–1.70) and 1.76 for coxibs (95% CI 0.73–4.27). For users of acetic acid derivatives and coxibs, the ORs increased by cumulative dose. Carriership of the prothrombin gene mutation or factor V Leiden had only minor effects on the results. We found no increased risks of VTE in association with use of NSAIDs. Users of high cumulative doses of acetic acid derivatives and coxibs had the highest risks, suggesting a relationship with cyclooxygenase selectivity and dose.

High-dimensional versus conventional propensity scores in a comparative effectiveness study of coxibs and reduced upper gastrointestinal complications

High-dimensional propensity score (hd-PS) adjustment has been proposed as a tool to improve control for confounding in pharmacoepidemiological studies using longitudinal claims databases. We investigated whether hd-PS matching improved confounding by indication in a study of Cox-2 inhibitors (coxibs) and traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) and their association with the risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC). In a cohort study of new users of coxibs and tNSAIDs we compared the effectiveness of these drugs to reduce UGIC using hd-PS matching and conventional propensity score (PS) matching in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database. The unadjusted rate ratio (RR) of UGIC for coxib users versus tNSAID users was 1.21 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.61]. The conventional PS matched cohort based on 79 investigator-identified covariates resulted in a RR of 0.84 (0.56-1.26). The use of the hd-PS algorithm based on 900 empirical covariates further decreased the RR to 0.62 (0.43-0.91). A comparison of hd-PS matching versus conventional PS matching resulted in improved point estimates for studying an intended treatment effect of coxibs versus tNSAIDs when benchmarked against results from randomized controlled trials.

Adherence to Gastroprotective Agents and the Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Complications in Coxib Users

Background: Little is known about the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) protective effect of gastroprotective agents (GPAs) in COX-2-specific inhibitors (coxib)-users. Objectives: To study the association between GPA adherence and UGI complications among coxib-users. Methods: We used primary care data from the United Kingdom's (UK) General Practice Research Database , the Dutch (NL) Integrated Primary Care Information database, and the Italian (IT) Health Search/Thales Database. A case-control study was conducted within a cohort of coxib+GPA users aged ≥ 50 yrs. Episodes of coxib use were defined as a period of coxib use with gaps between subsequent prescriptions that were no longer than 100% of the duration of the previous coxib prescription. Patients could have more than one episode of coxib use during follow-up, but only if at least a 180-days NSAID-free period was present prior to the start of each episode. Cases with UGI complications (UGI bleeding and diagnosed symptomatic UGI ulcers) during or within 60 days after coxib use were matched to controls on age, gender, database, and calendar time. Adherence to GPAs was calculated over the most recent episode of coxib use prior to the index date as the proportion of coxib treatment days covered (PDC) by a GPA prescription. Adherence was expressed as a continuous variable as well as categorical (low (PDC 80%)). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Results: 98,940 coxib episodes were counted in the coxib user cohort (UK: 52,698; NL: 7,201, IT: 39,041). In 16,442 (16.6%) of the eligible coxib episodes a GPA was prescribed (UK: 21.2%; NL: 13.4%, IT: 11.0%). Of the GPA users, 7.2% had low adherence (PDC 80%). Overall, mean pooled adherence was 0.76±0.30 (UK: 0.79±0.29; NL: 0.85±0.27; IT: 0.66±0.30). Only 18% used coxibs >90 days. In those patients, mean adherence dropped to 0.65 ± 0.34. Within the coxib+GPA users, we identified 74 cases with an UGI complication (30 UGI bleedings and 44 (un)complicated UGI ulcers). Mean adherence (PDC) to GPA was 0.72±0.32 for UGI complication cases compared to 0.78±0.30 for controls. Among low adherers, the risk was 1.97 (95%CI 0.84-4.60) for all UGI complications, compared with high adherers. For every 10% decrease in adherence, the risk of all UGI complications increased by 9% (OR: 1.09, 95%CI: 1.001.18). Conclusions: The risk of UGI complications increased by 9% in all coxib users ≥ 50 years for every 10% decrease in adherence of GPAs. Patients benefit from GPAs in addition to coxibs to lower their increased risk of UGI complications.

Long Term Safety of an NSAID With Built-in Gastroprotection for Treatment of Pain and Inflammation Related to Oa and RA: Comparative Results From Blinded and Open Label One Year Safety Trials of a Single-Tablet Combination of Ibuprofen-Famotidine

Background: Little is known about the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) protective effect of gastroprotective agents (GPAs) in COX-2-specific inhibitors (coxib)-users. Objectives: To study the association between GPA adherence and UGI complications among coxib-users. Methods: We used primary care data from the United Kingdom's (UK) General Practice Research Database , the Dutch (NL) Integrated Primary Care Information database, and the Italian (IT) Health Search/Thales Database. A case-control study was conducted within a cohort of coxib+GPA users aged ≥ 50 yrs. Episodes of coxib use were defined as a period of coxib use with gaps between subsequent prescriptions that were no longer than 100% of the duration of the previous coxib prescription. Patients could have more than one episode of coxib use during follow-up, but only if at least a 180-days NSAID-free period was present prior to the start of each episode. Cases with UGI complications (UGI bleeding and diagnosed symptomatic UGI ulcers) during or within 60 days after coxib use were matched to controls on age, gender, database, and calendar time. Adherence to GPAs was calculated over the most recent episode of coxib use prior to the index date as the proportion of coxib treatment days covered (PDC) by a GPA prescription. Adherence was expressed as a continuous variable as well as categorical (low (PDC 80%)). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Results: 98,940 coxib episodes were counted in the coxib user cohort (UK: 52,698; NL: 7,201, IT: 39,041). In 16,442 (16.6%) of the eligible coxib episodes a GPA was prescribed (UK: 21.2%; NL: 13.4%, IT: 11.0%). Of the GPA users, 7.2% had low adherence (PDC 80%). Overall, mean pooled adherence was 0.76±0.30 (UK: 0.79±0.29; NL: 0.85±0.27; IT: 0.66±0.30). Only 18% used coxibs >90 days. In those patients, mean adherence dropped to 0.65 ± 0.34. Within the coxib+GPA users, we identified 74 cases with an UGI complication (30 UGI bleedings and 44 (un)complicated UGI ulcers). Mean adherence (PDC) to GPA was 0.72±0.32 for UGI complication cases compared to 0.78±0.30 for controls. Among low adherers, the risk was 1.97 (95%CI 0.84-4.60) for all UGI complications, compared with high adherers. For every 10% decrease in adherence, the risk of all UGI complications increased by 9% (OR: 1.09, 95%CI: 1.001.18). Conclusions: The risk of UGI complications increased by 9% in all coxib users ≥ 50 years for every 10% decrease in adherence of GPAs. Patients benefit from GPAs in addition to coxibs to lower their increased risk of UGI complications.

The Comparative Safety of Analgesics in Older Adults With Arthritis

The safety of alternative analgesics is unclear. We examined the comparative safety of nonselective NSAIDs (nsNSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (coxibs), and opioids. Medicare beneficiaries from Pennsylvania and New Jersey who initiated therapy with an nsNSAID, a coxib, or an opioid from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2005, were matched on propensity scores. We studied the risk of adverse events related to analgesics using incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards regression. The mean age of participants was 80.0 years, and almost 85% were female. After propensity score matching, the 3 analgesic cohorts were well balanced on baseline covariates. Compared with nsNSAIDs, coxibs (HR, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.62) and opioids (1.77; 1.39-2.24) exhibited elevated relative risk for cardiovascular events. Gastrointestinal tract bleeding risk was reduced for coxib users (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.35-1.00) but was similar for opioid users. Use of coxibs and nsNSAIDs resulted in a similar risk for fracture; however, fracture risk was elevated with opioid use (HR, 4.47; 95% CI, 3.12-6.41). Use of opioids (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.37-2.07) but not coxibs was associated with an increased risk for safety events requiring hospitalization compared with use of nsNSAIDs. In addition, use of opioids (HR, 1.87; 95 CI, 1.39-2.53) but not coxibs raised the risk of all-cause mortality compared with use of nsNSAIDs. The comparative safety of analgesics varies depending on the safety event studied. Opioid use exhibits an increased relative risk of many safety events compared with nsNSAIDs.

Co-prescription of gastroprotective agents in patients taking non-selective NSAIDs or COX-2 selective inhibitors: analysis of prescriptions

To evaluate the prevalence of co-prescription of GPAs (proton pump inhibitors - PPIs and H2-receptor antagonists) and non-selective NSAIDs or COXIBs in patients registered under the local health authority (LHA) of Bergamo, a city in the north of Italy. A drug utilization analysis was done using the Bergamo prescription Health Services Electronic Database. All patients aged 35 years or older who had received at least one prescription during 2004 for non-selective NSAIDs and/or COXIBs were divided into three groups: occasional, chronic and new users. Among chronic users, 44.8% were treated with non-selective NSAIDs, 11.6% with COXIBs, and 43.6% with both (mixed NSAIDs). For new users, non-selective NSAIDs were prescribed to 82.7%, COXIBs and mixed NSAIDs to 10.8% and 6.5%. PPIs were co-prescribed to 7.1% of COXIB users and 5.8% of non-selective NSAID occasional users. Among chronic users, the figures were 15.6% and 14%. For new users, prescriptions for COXIBs were associated with less use of GPA for patients who received the first and last prescription for NSAIDs and GPAs on the same day, while for patients who became chronic users COXIBs did not reduce the probability of co-prescription of a GPA: the number of co-prescribed medications and antithrombotics or corticosteroids were independent predictors of GPA use. COXIBs seem to be used in patients at high risk of GI toxicity. However, the fear of GI adverse reactions and the uncertain safety profile of COXIBs leads many physicians to boost the gastroprotection by prescribing a PPI.

Concordance between prescriber‐ and patient‐reported previous medical history and NSAID indication in the CADEUS cohort

Various data sources may be used in pharmacoepidemiological studies. When they cannot be obtained from valid databases, medical data must be obtained from physicians or patients. In the CADEUS study, both patients and their prescribers reported medical data allowing investigation of the concordance between these sources. CADEUS is a French national cohort study of traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and coxib users conducted between September 2003 and August 2004 in France that employed self-administered questionnaires to obtain medical data from patients and their prescribers. The Kappa statistic (kappa) was used to measure concordance between patients and prescribers in 18 530 pairs with regard to previous medical history and index NSAID indication. For previous medical history, the proportion of agreement ranged from 70.7 to 99.2% and concordance was: substantial (kappa = 0.61-0.80) for hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke and diabetes; moderate (kappa = 0.41-0.60) for angina pectoris, peripheral arterial disease and hypercholesterolaemia; fair (kappa = 0.21-0.40) for unstable angina, cardiac insufficiency, dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux and gastric ulcer; slight (kappa < 0.21) for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. For index NSAID indication, the proportion of agreement ranged from 84.3 to 99.4% and concordance was almost perfect (kappa = 0.81-1.00) for inflammatory rheumatism, flu-like symptoms, dysmenorrhoea and dental pain; substantial for arthritis, back pain and headache; moderate for osteoarticular pain. Concordance was better for specific or serious conditions both regarding previous medical history and indication. Prescriber or patient perception and understanding may reduce concordance for certain items.

Rofecoxib, but not celecoxib, increases the risk of thromboembolic cardiovascular events in young adults—a nationwide registry-based study

To examine the risk of thromboembolic cardiovascular events in users of coxibs and NSAIDs in a nationwide cohort. Data were synchronised from three nationwide databases, the Icelandic Medicines Registry (IMR), The Icelandic National Patient Registry (INPR) and the Registry for Causes of Death at Statistics Iceland (RCD), for prescriptions for NSAIDs or coxibs with respect to hospitalisation for unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction over a 3-year period. The Cox proportional hazards model and Poisson regression were used to analyse the data. A total of 108,700 individuals received prescriptions for NSAIDs or coxibs (ATC code M01A), of whom 78,539 received one drug only (163,406 person-years). Among those receiving only one drug 426 individuals were discharged from hospital with endpoint diagnoses. In comparison to diclofenac, the incidence ratios, adjusted for age and gender, were significantly higher for cerebral infarction (2.13; 95% CI 1.54-2.97; P < 0.001), for myocardial infarction (1.77; 95% CI 1.34-2.32; P < 0.001) and for unstable angina pectoris (1.52; 95% CI 1.01-2.30; P = 0.047) for patients who used rofecoxib. For naproxen users, the incidence ratio was 1.46 for myocardial infarction (95% CI 1.03-2.07; P = 0.03), but was reduced in ibuprofen users (0.63; 95% CI 0.40-1.00; P = 0.05). The youngest users of rofecoxib (< or =39 years) had the highest hazard ratio (HR) for cardiovascular events (8.34; P < 0.001), while those > or =60 years had a lower but still significantly elevated HR (1.35; P = 0.001). This Icelandic nationwide registry-based study amounting to 163,406 patient-years showed increased risk of cardiovascular events, i.e. cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris, among rofecoxib and naproxen users in comparison to diclofenac users. The added risk was most pronounced in young adults using rofecoxib.

Hospitalizations for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular events in the CADEUS cohort of traditional or Coxib NSAID users.

To assess hospital admission rates for gastrointestinal (GI) or cardiovascular (CV) events in real-life use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). CADEUS is a real-life population-based cohort study of 23 535 coxib (celecoxib or rofecoxib) and 22 919 traditional NSAID (tNSAID) users. Each hospitalization reported between index day (NSAID delivery) and questionnaire submission (median = 75 days) was explored using hospital discharge summaries. An expert committee validated blindly serious GI and CV events according to predefined criteria. Coxib users were older and had more GI history than tNSAID users. There were 21 hospitalizations for GI events, 12 in the coxib cohort and nine in the tNSAID cohort (respectively one and three upper GI haemorrhages and no ulcer perforations). Rates of GI events were 0.39 per 1000 patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18, 0.75] for tNSAID users and 0.51 per 1000 patients (95% CI 0.26, 0.89) for coxib users. There were 21 hospitalizations for CV events, 13 in the coxib cohort and eight in the tNSAID cohort. None was fatal. Rates of CV events were, respectively, 0.59 (95% CI 0.24, 1.22), 0.51 (95% CI 0.19, 1.11) and 0.35 (95% CI 0.15, 0.69) per 1000 patients for celecoxib, rofecoxib and tNSAIDs. GI or CV event rates were not different between products even for patients >60 years old. Hospitalization rates for GI bleeding were 10-20 times lower than expected from published randomized clinical trials, probably because of differences in drug usage and concomitant gastroprotection. CV event rates conformed to those expected from general population data. These results emphasize the necessity of developing population healthcare databases to explore such low event rates.

COX‐2 inhibitors: complex association with lower risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal events compared to traditional NSAIDs plus proton pump inhibitors

To compare hospitalization rates for serious upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) events between chronic and acute users of a traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAID) + proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and users of a COX-2 selective inhibitor (Coxib). The PHARMO Record Linkage System, including linked drug-dispensing and hospital records of approximately 3 million individuals in the Netherlands was used. We selected new Coxib or tNSAID users (01/01/2000-31/12/2004) with > or =1 year history before the first NSAID dispensing and > or =1 year follow-up ending at the first hospitalization for GI event (the outcome), last dispensing, or end of the study period. Chronic users were patients who used any NSAIDs for > or =60 days during the first year (n = 58 770); others were acute users (n = 538 420). Multivariate analysis was performed by Poisson regression adjusted for gender, age, and duration of follow-up, tNSAID and Coxib dose, NSAID/PPI adherence, use of other gastroprotective agents, anticoagulants, acetaminophen, corticosteroids, and cardiovascular disease. The cohort included 23 999 new tNSAIDs + PPI users and 25 977 new Coxib users, with main characteristics: mean +/- SD age 58.1 +/- 15.5 vs. 56.7 +/- 17.5; female 55.3% vs. 62.2%; duration of treatment (days): 137 +/- 217 vs. 138 +/- 179, respectively. Among acute users, adjusted hazard ratios (95% Confidence Interval) were 0.21 (0.14-0.32) for upper and 0.26 (0.16-0.42) for lower GI events, for Coxib versus tNSAIDs + PPI users. Among chronic users, these were 0.35 (0.22-0.55) for upper GI and 0.43 (0.25-0.75) for lower GI events. Coxib users had significantly lower rates of GI events. Further research should elucidate the possible impact of selection bias.

Subgroup analyses to determine cardiovascular risk associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and coxibs in specific patient groups

To explore the extent to which clinical characteristics influence the association between cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (coxibs) and/or nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in specific patient subgroups. There is substantial concern regarding the potential cardiovascular adverse effects of selective coxibs and nonselective NSAIDs, but many patients with arthritis experience important clinical benefits from these agents. The study population consisted of Medicare beneficiaries also eligible for a drug benefits program for older adults during the years 1999-2004. We calculated the relative risk (RR) for CVD events (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, congestive heart failure, and cardiovascular death) among users of coxibs or nonselective NSAIDs in the prior 6 months compared with nonusers. We assessed biologic interaction between these medication exposures and important patient characteristics. In the primary cohort, we identified 76,082 new users of coxibs, 53,014 new users of nonselective NSAIDs, and 46,558 nonusers. Compared with nonusers, the adjusted RR of CVD events for new users of each agent increased for rofecoxib (RR 1.22, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.14, 1.30) and decreased for naproxen (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67, 0.93). Several patient characteristics were found to increase the risk of CVD events among users of some agents in both the primary and secondary cohorts, including age >/=80 years, hypertension, prior MI, prior CVD, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic renal disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Rofecoxib and ibuprofen appeared to confer an increased risk in multiple patient subgroups. Many nonselective NSAIDs and coxibs are not associated with an increased risk of CVD events. However, several patient characteristics identify important subgroups that may be at an increased risk when using specific agents.

Evaluation of Risk Profiles for Gastrointestinal and Cardiovascular Adverse Effects in Nonselective NSAID and COX-2 Inhibitor Users

Newly approved drugs, in comparison with older drugs, are more often prescribed to patients who have not responded satisfactorily to established related drugs or as first-line therapy to patients with a high baseline risk for adverse outcomes (i.e. channelling). However, these patients are less likely to benefit from the prescribed drug and/or are more prone to adverse drug reactions. Therefore, it is difficult to unravel whether observed risks or increases in risk of new drugs are real, i.e. related to the pharmacology, or whether these are related to selective prescribing to patients who are more susceptible to adverse events because of some underlying risk factor(s). The channelling paradox may exist for cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors ('coxibs') instead of traditional nonselective NSAIDs in relation to both gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) safety. To evaluate the risk profiles for GI and CV adverse effects in nonselective NSAID and coxib new-user populations over time, in terms of a quantitative measure since the introduction of coxibs. This was a population-based cohort study using the Dutch pharmaceutical claims database (Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics). Eligible patients (>/=18 years) were those where the date of their first prescription (index date) of an NSAID (first-line [e.g. ibuprofen] or second-line [e.g. piroxicam] nonselective NSAID, COX-2 preferential NSAID or coxib) was between January 1999 and December 2003. For each patient, GI and CV risk profiles at index date were defined by a cumulative score derived from dispensing data (patient age, sex and history of medication use within 6 months of index date). Risk scores were categorized as low (score = 0), medium (1) or high (2+). Patients were recorded as switchers based on other NSAID use prior to the index date. Other information collected included the Chronic Disease Score (CDS). Crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for risk factors for each NSAID group versus first-line nonselective NSAID users as the reference cohort. The effect of calendar time was examined by plotting mean CV or GI risk score by quarter-year. Correlation between GI and CV scores was examined using the Pearson correlation coefficient (R). Data were stratified by patients' history of switching. The four cohorts comprised patients using: first-line nonselective NSAIDs (n = 42 750); second-line nonselective NSAIDs (n = 1771); COX-2 preferential NSAIDs (n = 3661) and coxibs (n = 4861) patients. New coxib users were most likely to have high GI and CV risk scores (OR 5.3 [95% CI 5.0, 5.6] and OR 2.2 [95% CI 2.1, 2.4], respectively). At the individual patient level, GI and CV risk profiles were moderately well correlated for all NSAID cohorts (R range 0.48 to 0.62). There was no remarkable change in mean GI or CV risk profile of patients over calendar time since the market introduction of coxibs. Of the four NSAID cohorts, new coxib users tended to have the highest numbers of GI and CV risk factors, with no obvious change over calendar time. There was also evidence of correlation between GI and CV risk scores. Thus, selective prescribing of coxibs applies to people with co-existing CV as well as GI risk factors. This is important when comparing the safety and/or efficacy of new therapies to existing therapies, and emphasizes the difficulties encountered by prescribers in assessing levels of risk when initiating coxib treatment.

Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Complications Among Users of Traditional NSAIDs and COXIBs in the General Population

Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Complications Among Users of Traditional NSAIDs and COXIBs in the General Population

Large‐scale stopping and switching treatment with COX‐2 inhibitors after the rofecoxib withdrawal

To compare treatment changes after the rofecoxib withdrawal with changes occurring normally and to re-assess 12 months afterwards. The PHARMO database comprised medication and hospital discharge records of over 3 million inhabitants in the Netherlands. The Study cohort included chronic coxib users with a coxib prescription on 30th September 2004; the Reference cohort others with a coxib prescription on 1st June 2004. Initial treatment changes were based on first new prescription since cohort entry. Twelve-month changes were studied within the Study cohort only. The Study cohort (n = 6974) and Reference cohort (n = 5393) had similar demographics, stratified on type of coxib. In the Study cohort, 3341 (48%) initially stopped coxibs, of whom 1121 (16%) stopped all analgesic, versus 13 and 5% in the Reference cohort (p < 0.001). Among 'other coxib' users 32% stopped coxibs, and 15% stopped all analgesics, versus 14% and 4%, p < 0.001 in the Reference cohort. Among those who stopped coxibs, 34% switched to non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (nsNSAID) without PPI, 21% to nsNSAID with PPI, and 45% stopped NSAID treatment (Reference cohort: 35, 20, and 44%, respectively). These rates for 'other coxib users' were: switching to nsNSAID without PPI 23% (Study Cohort) versus 35% (Reference Cohort), 13 versus 28%, and 64 versus 37% respectively (p < 0.001). Twelve months later, stopping NSAID increased to 43%, stopping all analgesics to 32%. Rheumatologists continued coxibs more frequently than other caregivers (87, 65, 54%, respectively). The rofecoxib withdrawal resulted in a large proportion of patients who discontinued analgesic treatment altogether regardless of original coxib therapy.

Risk of Peptic Ulcer Hospitalizations in Users of NSAIDs With Gastroprotective Cotherapy Versus Coxibs

The primary strategies to reduce the risk of serious gastropathy caused by traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are use of a coxib or concurrent use of a proton pump inhibitor or double-dose histamine-2 receptor antagonist. However, the relative clinical effectiveness of these therapeutic alternatives is understudied. We studied peptic ulcer hospitalizations in a cohort of Tennessee Medicaid enrollees between 1996 and 2004. To decrease potential "channeling" bias, the study included only new episodes of prescribed NSAID or coxib use and controlled for multiple baseline risk factors for upper gastrointestinal disease. There were 234,010 and 48,710 new episodes of NSAID and coxib use, respectively, with 363,037 person-years of follow-up and 1223 peptic ulcer hospitalizations. Current users of NSAIDs with no gastroprotective cotherapy had an adjusted incidence of peptic ulcer hospitalizations of 5.65 per 1000 person-years, 2.76 (95% confidence interval, 2.35-3.23) times greater than that for persons not currently using either NSAIDs or coxibs. This risk was reduced by 39% (16%-56%, 95% CI) for current users of NSAIDs with gastroprotective cotherapy and 40% (23%-54%) for current users of coxibs without such cotherapy. Concurrent users of NSAIDs and proton pump inhibitors had a 54% (27%-72%) risk reduction, very similar to the 50% (27%-66%) reduction for concurrent users of proton pump inhibitors and coxibs. These findings suggest that coprescribing a proton pump inhibitor with an NSAID is as effective as use of a coxib for reducing the risk of NSAID-induced gastropathy.

Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia, Renal Function, and Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug Use in an Ultraendurance Mountain Run

To study biochemical parameters and renal function in runners completing a 60 km mountain run and to investigate the incidence of exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH). To assess the effects of nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication (COXIBs) on these parameters. Observational cohort study. Kepler Challenge 60 km mountain run, Te Anau, New Zealand, December 2003. One hundred thirty-one of the 360 runners entered in the race were prospectively enrolled as volunteers on the day before the race. Subjects were weighed at race registration the day before the race and at the finish line. Blood was taken within 5 minutes of finishing and was analyzed for serum sodium, creatinine, urea, and potassium concentrations, and hematocrit. Participants were questioned about medication use in the 24 hours before and during the race (NSAIDs, COXIBs, other medications). Complete data sets were obtained on 123 runners. Five athletes were biochemically hyponatremic [(Na) 130-134 mM] and four were hypernatremic [(Na) 146-148 mM]. Hyponatremia was associated with a mean weight gain of 1.32 kg (range, -1.5 to 1.6 kg). Serum [Na] varied inversely with weight change. Estimated creatinine clearance did not vary with percent weight loss. Estimated creatinine clearance declined with increasing runner age. Sixty-five percent of runners did not use any medication, whereas 20% had used NSAIDs and 15% had taken COXIBs. There were no statistically significant differences between NSAID and COXIB users in any measured parameters or between all NSAID and COXIB users when compared with nonusers. Mild asymptomatic EAH was found to occur in 4% of the volunteer ultraendurance mountain runner study group and was associated with a mean weight gain of 1.32 kg (range, -1.5 to 1.6 kg) during the race. Seven percent gained weight but remained normonatremic, suggesting other compensatory mechanisms. Hypernatremia was found in 3% and was associated with a mean weight loss. Postrace serum sodium concentration varied inversely with percent weight change. Runners using any NSAID were more likely to become hyponatremic. Estimated creatinine clearance increased with increasing age. Elevated serum creatinine concentration at the end of the race returned to normal when remeasured the week after the race. Thirty-five percent of runners were found to use NSAIDs or COXIBs. The measures of weight change and of serum sodium, potassium, urea, and creatine concentration did not differ between NSAID and COXIB users or between all nonsteroidal antiinflammatory users and nonusers.

Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of Coxibs and Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs: High-Risk Subgroups and Time Course of Risk

Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of Coxibs and Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs: High-Risk Subgroups and Time Course of Risk