COVID-19 Infection In Cancer Patients Research Articles

Effective prevention of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients receiving antitumor drug therapy: a regional analysis

Background. The results of several multicenter studies indicate a high risk of severe COVID-19 and fatal outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including those with cancer. Effective prevention is critical to saving cancer patients' lives during the pandemic. Additional passive immunization with a combination of monoclonal antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 S protein in clinical studies showed a significant reduction in the risk of severe disease and death and a decrease in the frequency of hospitalizations. Real clinical practice shows the high efficiency of this approach in patients with oncological diseases receiving immunosuppressive therapy.
 Aim. To perform a comparative analysis of prevention effectiveness and COVID-19 severity in patients with solid malignant tumors receiving antitumor drug therapy.
 Materials and methods. The analysis included 100 vaccinated patients aged 22 to 84 with metastatic or inoperable solid tumors who received cytostatic therapy with or without a targeted agent. The median age was 56.5 years in Group 1 and 57.7 years in Group 2. In both groups, 32 (64%) patients had breast cancer, 10 (20%) had gastric, colon, and rectal cancers, 2 (4%) had lung cancer, 4 (8%), and 6 (12%) had reproductive cancers. In addition, Group 1 included 1 patient each with bladder and brain cancer. All were treated with antitumor drug therapy following clinical guidelines according to tumor localization.
 Results. The median number of received treatment lines of patients in Group 1 was 2.2, and 2.38 in Group 2. In Group 1, 42% of patients got infected, and 64% in Group 2. The combination of tixagevimab 150 mg + cilgavimab 150 mg monoclonal antibodies reduced the incidence of COVID-19 infection in any clinical form by 1.5-fold and hospitalizations by 1.3-fold. In Group 1, the rate of mild COVID-19 was higher; in Group 2, a higher risk of severe course was observed. In Group 1, viral pneumonia was 1.6-fold less common than in Group 2. Overall mortality in Group 1 was 6.5-fold lower than in Group 2. In Group 1, no COVID-19-related deaths were registered; in Group 2, the mortality rate was 8% (n=4). Mortality related to underlying disease in Group 2 was 3.5 times higher, and the risk of dying from the malignant tumor progression was 50% higher. In addition, in Group 2, 15% of deaths were related to cardiovascular diseases.
 Conclusion. Adding Evusheld to vaccinated patients significantly reduces the burden of COVID-19 infection in individuals with solid neoplasms who are receiving antitumor drug therapy. Patients receiving Evusheld at any stage of the underlying disease are less likely to have COVID-19, including severe infection, which requires hospitalization in an infectious hospital. The reduction in overall mortality in the Evusheld group suggests that COVID-19 affects overall survival in cancer patients. Evusheld reduced the risk of death in cancer patients from any causes: the progression of malignant tumors, COVID-19 infection, and other comorbidities.

Effect of definitive hypo-fractionated radiotherapy concurrent with weekly cisplatin in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

To mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients, it is recommended to utilize hypo-fractionated treatment schedules that aim to minimize the overall duration of treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine whether hypo-fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hypo-IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy was practical, effective, and could achieve acceptable tumor control rates for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We enrolled 62 patients with high-risk stage II, stage III, and IVA SCCHN who received hypo-IMRT (62.5 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks 2.5Gy/fraction with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2). Our primary endpoint was to assess acute toxicity, while our secondary endpoints were late toxicity, loco-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The percentages of grade 3 acute pain, dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia were 71%, 19.4%, 72.6%, and 41.9%, respectively. The rates of late xerostomia, dysphagia, dental complications, grade 3 pain, and grade 3 weight loss were 72.6%, 62.9%, 27.4%, 4.8%, and 4.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up time of 24 months, 2-year loco-regional control and overall survival were 87.1% and 83.9%, respectively. Disease-free survival was 100%, 89.5%, and 69% in stages II, III, and IV%, respectively, with a significant p-value of 0.024. This regimen was effective and relatively safe, with acceptable and tolerable acute and late toxicity. Given the reduced need for hospital visits, hypo-fractionated schedules may represent an alternative treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis on Chemosurveillance

COVID-19 infection and multiplication can be regulated with the aid of vaccines, immunosurveillance, and antiviral medications, such interferon and nucleoside analogs. The main concern with COVID-19 infection is the proliferation of the virus. However, there is no medication to treat pulmonary fibrosis, a life-threatening condition, once it has manifested. To treat critically ill patients with cancer and pulmonary fibrosis, it is imperative to develop cell differentiation agent (CDA) formulations that can kill cancer stem cells. Chemosurveillance for cancer patients no longer functions as intended. As a result, people with cancer are more likely to experience severe symptoms of pulmonary fibrosis. The harm to chemosurveillance caused by cancer treatments that focus on cell death, such as cytotoxic drugs, radiation, and immunotherapy, may gravely accelerate the development of fatal pulmonary fibrosis. To prevent the development of fatal pulmonary fibrosis symptoms, cancer patients should be advised against contracting COVID-19, but, if they do, targeted therapy should be their first choice. The purpose of this study was to highlight the significance of chemosurveillance in determining when fatal pulmonary fibrosis manifests after COVID-19 infection in cancer patients and to conceptualize CDA formulations that can be used to treat both pulmonary fibrosis and cancer. COVID-19 infection causes biological and immunological reactions that are similar to those of a wound, leading to the production of prostaglandins and tumor necrosis factor, which cause respiratory illness symptoms, such as fever and cough, and cachexia symptoms, respectively. This results in the breakdown of chemosurveillance, a natural defense mechanism that ensures optimal wound healing, thus further promoting the development of cancer and pulmonary fibrosis.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with genitourinary cancer.

7 Background: Cancer patients have increased risk for severe outcomes related to SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19), due to their increased vulnerability to infection, older age, and comorbidities in comparison to the general population. While multiple studies have been completed examining outcomes of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients overall, there has been limited investigation into the outcomes of COVID-19 infection in patients with genitourinary (GU) cancers. Methods: We completed a single institution retrospective study to examine the outcomes of adults with GU cancers and COVID-19 infection from March 10, 2020 to June 15, 2022. Baseline data included age, sex, BMI, type of malignancy, cancer status (stable or progressive disease, in remission), current and previous anticancer therapy received, and comorbidities. Results: Eighty-four patients with a GU cancer diagnosis and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. Seventy-nine (94%) were male and the median age was 64 years (range 24-91). Forty-four (52%) were non-Hispanic white, 28 (33%) were Hispanic, and 11 (13%) were African-American. Prostate cancer was the most common (n = 45), followed by renal cell carcinoma (n = 20), testicular (n = 9), bladder (n = 6), and penile cancer (n = 3). Eight patients had ≥2 episodes of COVID-19 infection. Sixty-three percent of patients were unvaccinated at the time of infection, while 37% of patients had breakthrough infection. Hospitalization was required for 39.3% (n = 33), with 4.8% (n = 4) requiring ICU admission. Of the patients requiring hospitalization, 26.2% (n = 22) died. Hospitalization was associated with having ≥2 comorbidities (OR 18.6 [95% CI, 3.1-111.8], p<0.01) and receiving active cancer treatment (OR 12.4 [95% CI, 1.92-79.7], p< 0.01). Mortality was associated with advanced age (OR 21.7 [95% CI, 1.40-341.7], p=0.03) and ≥2 comorbidities (OR 19.2 [95% CI, 3.02-122.5], p=0.02). Vaccination was negatively associated with both hospitalization (OR 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02-0.91], p=0.04) and mortality (OR 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.84], p=0.03). Conclusions: Among patients with GU cancer, advanced age and comorbidities are associated with adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infection; vaccination is protective. With the emergence of variants and waning immunity of vaccines, our findings highlight the importance of development and implementation of enhanced mitigation strategies in cancer patients, especially those undergoing active cancer treatment.

Identification of GINS1 as a therapeutic target in the cancer patients infected with COVID-19: a bioinformatics and system biology approach

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a series of biological changes in cancer patients which have rendered the original treatment ineffective and increased the difficulty of clinical treatment. However, the clinical treatment for cancer patients infected with COVID-19 is currently unavailable. Since bioinformatics is an effective method to understand undiscovered biological functions, pharmacological targets, and therapeutic mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients and to search the potential treatments.MethodsFirstly, we obtained the COVID-19-associated genes from seven databases and analyzed the cancer pathogenic genes from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, respectively. The Cancer/COVID-19-associated genes were shown by Venn analyses. Moreover, we demonstrated the signaling pathways and biological functions of pathogenic genes in Cancer/COVID-19.ResultsWe identified that Go-Ichi-Ni-San complex subunit 1 (GINS1) is the potential therapeutic target in Cancer/COVID-19 by GEPIA. The high expression of GINS1 was not only promoting the development of cancers but also affecting their prognosis. Furthermore, eight potential compounds of Cancer/COVID-19 were identified from CMap and molecular docking analysis.ConclusionWe revealed the GINS1 is a potential therapeutic target in cancer patients infected with COVID-19 for the first time, as COVID-19 will be a severe and prolonged pandemic. However, the findings have not been verified actually cancer patients infected with COVID-19, and further studies are needed to demonstrate the functions of GINS1 and the clinical treatment of the compounds.

Incidence and Outcome of COVID-19 Infection in Cancer Patients, A Long Term Study: An Experience From Pakistan

Incidence and Outcome of COVID-19 Infection in Cancer Patients, A Long Term Study: An Experience From Pakistan

456P Outcomes of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients: A single center study

Patients with cancer can be considered more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection with severe disease and higher mortality rate. This can be attributed to the weaker immune system as a consequence of the malignancy and its treatment. The present study was undertaken to estimate the rate of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients, assess the severity of COVID-19 infection and mortality in cancer patients while on anticancer therapy.

510P Long-term outcomes of COVID-19 infection in patients with solid tumors before vaccination

During the pandemic, there have been significant developments in the implementation of preventive measures, including follow up of COVID-19 infection and contact, increased testing capacity, and vaccination. On the other hand, the fluctuating course continues due to the COVID-19 variants. Cancer patients are among the groups most affected by the pandemic. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the long-term effects of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients before vaccination.

The Role of Lymphocyte Subsets, PD-1, and FAS (CD95) in COVID-19 Cancer Patients.

Lymphocytes are the main orchestrators that regulate the immune response in SARS-COV-2 infection. The exhaustion of T lymphocytes is a contributing factor to lymphopenia, which is responsible for the COVID-19 adverse outcome. However, it is still not demonstrated on a large scale, including cancer patients. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 83 SARS-CoV2 infected cancer patients, and 29 COVID-19 infected noncancer patients compared to 28 age-matched healthy controls. Lymphocyte subsets were assessed for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, PD-1, and CD95 using flow cytometry. The data were correlated to the patients' clinical features, COVID-19 severity and outcomes. Lymphopenia, and decreased CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were significantly observed in COVID-19 cancer and noncancer patients compared to the control group (p < 0.001, for all). There was a significantly increased expression of CD95 and PD-1 on the NK cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells in COVID-19 cancer and noncancer patients in comparison to the control group. The increased expression of CD95 on CD8+ T cells, as well as the increased expression of PD-1 on CD8+ T cells and NK cells are significantly associated with the severity of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients. The increased expression of CD95 and PD-1 on the CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells was observed significantly in nonsurviving patients and those who were admitted to the intensive care unit in COVID-19 cancer and noncancer patients. The increased expression of PD-1 and CD95 could be possible prognostic factors for COVID-19 severity and adverse outcomes in COVID-19 cancer and noncancer patients.

Clinical Post-SARS-CoV-2 Infection Scenarios in Vaccinated and Non-Vaccinated Cancer Patients in Three German Cancer Centers: A Retrospective Analysis

Simple SummaryThis study investigated SARS-CoV-2 infections and their impact on cancer in COVID-19 vaccinated (n = 49) and non-vaccinated (n = 84) cancer patients. A mild course of COVID-19 was documented more frequently in vaccinated cancer patients (49% vs. 29%), while the incidence of severe and critical courses occurred in approximately one-half of the non-vaccinated patients (22% vs. 42%). In comparison to non-vaccinated patients, admissions to intermediate and intensive care units and the need for non-invasive and invasive respiratory support were reduced by 71% and 50% among vaccinated patients. The median length of hospital stay was 11 days for non-vaccinated and 5 days for vaccinated patients. COVID-19 mortality was reduced by 83% in vaccinated patients. Finally, the median time from SARS-CoV-2 infection to restarting cancer therapy was 12 and 26 days among vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups, respectively. Our results provide evidence for the significant benefits of COVID-19 vaccines for cancer patients.COVID-19 vaccines have become an integral element in the protection of cancer patients against SARS-CoV-2. To date, there are no direct comparisons of the course of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients between the pre- and post-vaccine era. We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 infections and their impact on cancer in COVID-19 vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients from three German cancer centers. Overall, 133 patients with SARS-CoV-2 were enrolled in pre- and post-vaccine eras: 84 non-vaccinated and 49 vaccinated, respectively. A mild course of COVID-19 was documented more frequently in vaccinated patients (49% vs. 29%), while the frequency of severe and critical courses occurred in approximately one-half of the non-vaccinated patients (22% vs. 42%, p = 0.023). Particularly, patients with hematologic neoplasms benefited from vaccination in this context (p = 0.031). Admissions to intermediate- and intensive-care units and the necessity of non-invasive and invasive respiratory support were reduced by 71% and 50% among vaccinated patients, respectively. The median length of admission was 11 days for non-vaccinated and 5 days for vaccinated patients (p = 0.002). COVID-19 mortality was reduced by 83% in vaccinated patients (p = 0.046). Finally, the median time from SARS-CoV-2 infection to restarting cancer therapy was 12 and 26 days among vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups, respectively (p = 0.002). Although this study does not have enough power to perform multivariate analyses to account for confounders, it provides data on COVID-19 in non-vaccinated and vaccinated cancer patients and illustrates the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccines for these patients.

Outcome of cancer patients affected by COVID-19 in different settings.

e18709 Background: The mortality rate of cancer patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection has reached 25%. The time from symptom onset to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) was on average 10 days, with approximately 26% of patients requiring ICU admission. A higher mortality attributed to COVID-19 was seen in older patients, patients with certain cancer types, and patients with a higher Charslon comorbidity score. Moreover, male sex and leukopenia at diagnosis were associated with an increased risk of worse clinical outcomes. Furthermore, a study done at Memorial Sloan Kettering showed that patients with hematological malignancies had a worse prognosis than those with solid tumors. Our aim is to identify the predictive factors for ICU admission in the setting of positive COVID-19 infection in cancer patients. Differences in prognosis were compared between cancer and non-cancer patients admitted to the ICU due to COVID-19 infection. We also compared the overall outcome between patients with solid cancers and hematologic malignancies. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study based on chart review analysis conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC). 248 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021. The patient groups were (1) all cancer patients admitted to the COVID unit, (2) all cancer patients admitted to ICU, and (3) all other patients without cancer admitted to the ICU. The main outcomes were ICU admission and mortality. Results: 173 cancer patients were admitted to our institution for the management of COVID-19 with a mean age of 63 years. 52 patients (30%) required ICU admission and 50 patients (29%) died during hospital stay or 1 month following discharge. The time from symptom onset to ICU admission and death were 12.8 and 35 days, respectively. Patients admitted to the ICU were more likely to have anemia (Hb &lt; 8 g/dL) and thrombocytopenia (&lt; 50,000/mm3) on admission (p = 0.001). Age, male sex and history of smoking, diabetes or cardiopulmonary diseases were not associated with greater risk of ICU admission or death. Among cancer patients, those with uncontrolled disease at the onset of COVID-19 had greater risk of death from COVID-19 (p = 0.001). Cancer type, number of lines of treatment, history of radiation to the chest, recent cytotoxic therapy, and neutropenia were not associated with ICU admission or death from COVID-19. There was no statistical significance in mortality or disease progression between patients with solid or hematologic malignancies. Conclusions: Our data reaffirms previously reported findings of high mortality in cancer patients who contract COVID-19. In particular, patients with anemia, thrombocytopenia, and uncontrolled disease at diagnosis had unfavorable outcomes. Contrary to the literature, age, male sex, cancer type, and neutropenia were not predictive factors for mortality in cancer patients in the setting of COVID-19 infections.

Outcome and Prognostic Factors of COVID-19 Infection in Swiss Cancer Patients: Final Results of SAKK 80/20 (CaSA).

Simple SummaryThe characterization of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in COVID-19-infected cancer patients is important for health care authorities, policy makers and oncologists. We collected extensive data on COVID-19-infected cancer patients from 1 March 2020 over a one-year period. Among 455 patients included, death from COVID-19 infection occurred in 98 patients, resulting in a mortality rate of 21.5%. Age ≥ 65 years, non-curative disease, intensive care unit admission and oxygen requirement were particular and independent negative prognostic factors for death from COVID-19. COVID-19 severity and mortality in cancer patients remained high in a country (Switzerland) with a decentralized, high-quality, universal-acess health care system.Purpose: These are the final results of a national registry on cancer patients with COVID-19 in Switzerland. Methods: We collected data on symptomatic COVID-19-infected cancer patients from 23 Swiss sites over a one-year period starting on 1 March 2020. The main objective was to assess the outcome (i.e., mortality, rate of hospitalization, ICU admission) of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients; the main secondary objective was to define prognostic factors. Results: From 455 patients included, 205 patients (45%) had non-curative disease, 241 patients (53%) were hospitalized for COVID-19, 213 (47%) required oxygen, 43 (9%) invasive ventilation and 62 (14%) were admitted to the ICU. Death from COVID-19 infection occurred in 98 patients, resulting in a mortality rate of 21.5%. Age ≥65 years versus <65 years (OR 3.14, p = 0.003), non-curative versus curative disease (OR 2.42, p = 0.012), ICU admission (OR 4.45, p < 0.001) and oxygen requirement (OR 20.28, p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: We confirmed high COVID-19 severity and mortality in real-world cancer patients during the first and second wave of the pandemic in a country with a decentralized, high-quality, universal-access health care system. COVID-19-associated mortality was particularly high for those of older age in a non-curative disease setting, requiring oxygen or ICU care.

Outcomes of patients with cancer infected with SARS-CoV-2: results from the Ion Chiricuţă Oncology Institute series

BackgroundThe evolution of COVID-19 is a controversial topic in cancer patients. They have been designated by international organizations as a vulnerable population at greater risk for contracting SARS-CoV-2 and having a more severe clinical outcome.Patients and methodsActive screening at our institution became routine early in the pandemic. We have examined the clinical data of 341 cancer patients, with a positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test between April 2020 and February 2021, in the prevaccination era.ResultsDuring the infection, 40.5% remained asymptomatic, 27.6% developed a mild form, 20.5% had a moderate form, and 11.4% a severe/critical form of COVID-19 that led to death in 7.6% of cases. Treatment was adapted to disease severity according to national guidelines. In our series, the incidence of COVID-19 infection was lower in cancer patients compared with the general population (P < 0.001), however, the mortality rate was higher in cancer patients in comparison with the general population (7.6% versus 2.9%, P < 0.001). The prognostic factors were assessed by three distinct univariate and multivariate analyses: (i) evolution to a moderate or severe/critical clinical manifestation, (ii) clinical worsening (severe/critical form or death), and (iii) overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, the prognostic factors associated with the evolution to a moderate or severe/critical clinical manifestation were: performance status (PS) (P < 0.0001) and no active treatment in the previous 3 months (P = 0.031). Factors associated with clinical worsening were: PS (P < 0.0001), peripheral arterial disease (P = 0.03), and chronic liver disease (P = 0.04). Factors associated with impaired overall survival were PS (P < 0.0001), ischemic cardiac disease (P = 0.0126), chronic liver disease (P = 0.001), and radiotherapy (P = 0.0027).ConclusionOur series confirms a more severe evolution for COVID-19 infection in cancer patients, with PS as the most prominent prognostic factor in all three multivariate analyses. By active screening, efforts should be in place to keep cancer units as coronavirus-free sanctuaries.

The impact of hospital attendance on COVID-19 infection in cancer patients: an assessment of data from Guy's Cancer.

Objective: The authors monitored positivity rates of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 tests during the second wave of COVID-19 at Guy's Cancer Centre. Methods: Logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with asymptomatic COVID positivity rates between 1 December 2020 and 28 February 2021 (n = 1346). Results: Living 20–40 km and 40–60 km from the alpha variant was associated with a reduced chance of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test compared with 0–20 km (odds ratio [OR]: 0.20; CI: 0.07–0.53 and OR: 0.38; CI: 0.15–0.98, respectively). An increased number of tests was associated with an increased chance of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (OR: 1.10; CI: 1.04–1.16). Conclusion: The COVID-19 positivity rate of asymptomatic cancer patients is partly due to increased testing, with some contribution from the proximity of the patient population to the epicenter of the alpha variant.

The Impact of Routine Molecular Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Patients Receiving Anticancer Therapy: An Interim Analysis of the Observational COICA Study

Introduction: Cancer aggravates COVID-19 prognosis. Nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is particularly frequent in cancer patients, who need to attend hospitals regularly. Since March 2020, all cancer patients having access to the Oncology Unit at the “Andrea Tortora” Hospital (Pagani, Salerno – referred to as “the Hospital”) as inpatients or outpatients receiving intravenous therapy have been screened for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR nasal swab. The ongoing COICA (COVID-19 infection in cancer patients) study is an ambispective, multicenter, observational study designed to assess the prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients. The aim of the study presented here was to explore potential differences in COVID-19-related outcomes among screening-detected versus nonscreening-detected SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Methods: The COICA study enrolled cancer patients who had received any anticancer systemic therapy within 3 months since the day they tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR. The target accrual is 128 patients, and the study was approved by the competent Ethics Committee. Only the subgroup of patients enrolled at the Hospital was considered in this unplanned interim analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of screening-based versus nonscreening-based diagnosis. Results: Since March 15, 2020, until August 15, 2021, a total of 931 outpatients and 230 inpatients were repeatedly screened for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR nasal swab at the Hospital. Among these, 71 asymptomatic patients were positive on routine screening and 5 patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 outside the institutional screening. Seven patients died because of COVID-19. At univariate analysis, nonscreening- versus screening-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with significantly higher odds of O₂ therapy (OR = 16.2; 95% CI = 2.2–117.1; p = 0.006), hospital admission (OR = 31.5; 95% CI = 3.1–317.8; p = 0.003), admission to ICU (OR = 23.0; 95% CI = 2.4–223.8; p = 0.007), and death (OR = 8.8; 95% CI = 1.2–65.5; p = 0.034). Conclusion: Routine screening with RT-PCR may represent a feasible and effective strategy in reducing viral circulation and possibly COVID-19 mortality in patients with active cancer having repeated access to hospital facilities.

COVID-19 amongst cancer patients: An experience from Oman.

To evaluate the extent of coronavirus infection in cancer patients along with their demographics, laboratory findings and outcomes in a tertiary care setting. The study was conducted in Muscat, Oman, from March 24 to October 23, 2020. The data was collected from the cancer registry of the Directorate-General of Non-Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health, Oman. Data of inpatient coronavirus cases were retrieved from the electronic medical records system of the Royal Hospital, Muscat, all tertiary hospitals linked electronically to the registry and the coronavirus registry of Oman. The data of cancer patients infected with coronavirus was analysed and compared with non-cancer coronavirus-infected patients. Data was analysed using IBM SPSS 2019 v26. Of the 16,260 cancer patients, 77(0.47%) were infected with COVID-19 compared to 111,837(2.17%) in the national population. Mortality among cancer patients with COVID-19 was high 27(35.1%) compared to 1,147(1.03%) in the national population. Cancer patients with COVID-19 also had diabetes 15(20%), hypertension 20(26%), renal complications 15(20%) and cardiac issues 9(12%). Of the total, 32(41.6%) cancer patients with COVID-19 had received active cancer treatment within the preceding 4 weeks. The data on coronavirus infection outcome is emerging at a rapid pace focussing on the impact of underlying diseases, and the capacity of healthcare systems. Oncologists should customise cancer management, while cancer patients must practise social distancing, and seek prompt evaluation of suspicious symptoms.

1570P Outcome and prognostic factors of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients: Final results of SAKK 80/20

1570P Outcome and prognostic factors of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients: Final results of SAKK 80/20

COVID-19 infection in cancer patients: the effect of Hepatitis B immunization

Introduction: To investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with COVID-19 infections and evaluate the effect of hepatitis B immunization status on susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and mortality risk. Materials and methods: The records of 1,515 patients who presented to the Medical Oncology clinic between March 2020 and December 2020 were analysed retrospectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of cancer patients with (case group) and without (control group) COVID-19 infection were compared. Results: Of the 1,515 patients, 153 (10.1%) had been diagnosed with COVID-19, and the median age of cancer patients with COVID-19 infection was 53.9 (range; 18–82) years. The most common types of cancer were breast cancer (26.2%), gastrointestinal system cancers (22.3%), genitourinary-system cancers (16.5%) and lung cancer (15.5%). The presence of metastatic disease [hazard ratio (HR): 0.09, 95% CI (0.01–0.83), (p = 0.03)] and receipt of palliative chemotherapy in the cancer patients with COVID-19 infections [HR: 0.1, 95% CI (0.01–0.69), (p = 0.02)] were identified as prognostic factors in multivariate analysis as univariate analysis did not indicate palliative treatment as a prognostic factor. When the case group and control groups were compared in terms of hepatitis B immunization status (p = 0.24), no statistically significant difference was identified between the two groups. Furthermore, hepatitis B immunization status (p = 0.37) were not found to be associated with COVID-19-related mortality risk. Conclusion: Hepatitis B immunization status were not associated with the risk of COVID-19 transmission and mortality. The present study identified the presence of metastatic disease and palliative chemotherapy as negative and positive prognostic factors, respectively.

A retrospective evaluation of the value of COVID-19 screening and testing in patients with cancer: Aiming at a moving target

BackgroundDiagnosis of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients is critical to co-manage their underlying disease and infection appropriately. Our study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of screening patients with cancer for COVID-19 infection. MethodsAll oncology patients receiving care at Department of Oncology at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh were screened using the acute respiratory infection (ARI) survey. Nasopharyngeal and throat swap for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was performed on patients who have high ARI score (i.e. ≥ 4), or any patient requiring elective/emergency hospitalization, undergoing a procedure as well as screening asymptomatic patients receiving chemotherapy between April 1st and July 30, 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Descriptive and inferential analyses were done and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated considering the COVID-19 PCR as the gold standard. ResultsDuring the study period, a total of 473 patients were included with a median age was 56 years (14–104), 51% were female, 73% had solid tumors, and 66% received treatment within the last 3 months. These patients underwent 688 PCR tests along with ARI survey screening. Testing was done in the outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department setting in 41%, 40% and 19% of the patients, respectively. Majority of tests were screening of asymptomatic patients and only 23% were tested for suspected infections with ARI ≥ 4. A total of 54 patients (8%) had positive PCR for COVID-19 infection. The prevalence of infection varied from month to month ranging from 1.09% in April up to 19.70% in June and correlated with the average daily and active case load at a national level. The diagnostic yield of the ARI score also correlated with infection burden nationally. The PPV and NPV of the ARI as a screening tool was 18.24% (0–31.8) and 95.6% (86.36–98.86%) with the PPN fluctuating considerably in parallel with the prevalence of COVID-19 result. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of the ARI were 55.77% (0–70.59) and 79.4 (69.19–92), respectively. ConclusionThe yield of screening asymptomatic patients with cancer varies based on the community burden of COVID-19 infection. As universal screening can cause delays to patient care, it should be tailored based on the individual patient risks and infection burden in the region.

Acute thromboembolic events (TE) within 30 days of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients.

e18691 Background: Increased rates of TE have been reported in patients (pts) with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), even without prior predisposition to thrombosis. Patients with cancer are already predisposed to a hypercoagulable state. We aimed to assess whether COVID-19 further increased the risk of TE in pts with active cancer at Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY. Methods: The EMR of 90 cancer pts diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 15th to April 10th, 2020 were reviewed. COVID-19 testing was performed by PCR of nasal swab samples. Active cancer was defined as disease treated &lt;1 year. Reports of imaging studies performed &lt;30 days of the COVID-19+ test, either for new symptoms or for other reasons, were reviewed for new arterial (ATE) and/or venous thromboses (VTE). Patient were followed for 30 days from the date of COVID-19+ test for development of TE, hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Results: Of 90 pts, 11 (12.2%) were found to have 13 new TE within 30 days of COVID-19+ test, 8 (8.9%) arterial and 5 (5.6%) venous. Of the 8 ATE, 7 were new strokes and/or microvascular cerebral disease (MCD) and 1 was a spleen infarct (SI). Of the 5 VTE, 3 were deep venous thrombosis, 1 pulmonary embolism (PE) and 1 patient presented with a superficial VTE. Two patients had 2 new TE each; stroke/PE and MCD/SI, respectively. Peak D-dimer (DD) value was higher in the TE group; mean DD (SD), TE vs no TE, 7.1 (3.4) vs 6.4 (7) ug/mL, p=0.03. Pts on either prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) had less TE; AC vs no AC, 9.1% vs 90.9%, p=0.0003. Only 1 pt on Enoxaparin prophylaxis developed TE. Of the 20 pts on therapeutic AC, 25% were newly started due to concern for thrombosis; the rest were already receiving AC for other reasons. Mortality was higher in the TE group; HR, TE vs no TE, 2.6, 95% CI (1.2 - 5.6), p=0.009. There was no correlation of cancer type, disease stage (metastatic or not), administration of prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy, common comorbidities, patient setting (inpatient, ICU, outpatient, ED visit), LOS or ventilation status with increased incidence of TE. Conclusions: Pts with COVID-19 have high rates of TE, and this is true for our pts with cancer. A high incidence of ATE was noted. TE was associated with increased mortality.[Table: see text]