Reviewed by: Covenant: The Framework of God's Grand Plan of Redemption by Daniel I. Block Reed Lessing daniel i. block, Covenant: The Framework of God's Grand Plan of Redemption (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2021). Pp. vii + 680. $54.99. After fifty years of studying Israel's Scriptures, Block presents his magnum opus—calling his book a "Here I stand" account of his findings (p. xiv). Although in his index B. provides two pages of cited works, the vast majority of the book's footnotes reference only biblical texts. In other words, B. does not interact—at least overtly—with other OT scholarship. He writes, "My primary desire in producing this volume is to celebrate the grace of God in designing and implementing his grand plan of redemption and to invite conversation on the plan generally and in its details" (p. xiv). His meticulously organized presentation of covenants in the Bible, then, is the author's academic and personal confession of faith. Foundational to B.'s work is the fact that he rejects the idea that there are conditional and unconditional covenants. Instead, he proposes that covenant theology is better understood through the lens of function rather than duration. That is to say, biblical covenants are either missional/communal or administrative, and they undergird what B. calls the Bible's four movements: redemption's background (Genesis 1–2); the need for redemption (Genesis 3:1–11:26); God's agents of redemption (Genesis 11:27–Malachi 4:6); and the arrival and mission of the Redeemer (Matthew–Revelation). Each of B.'s investigations into these four movements begins with sections exploring missional/communal covenants and ends with a similar analysis of the Bible's administrative covenants. One of the strengths of B.'s work is his consistent probing of the historical and literary contexts that give rise to the Bible's different covenants. Along the way, he structures his discussions from what he calls the cosmic and Adamic covenants, the Israelite (or patriarchal) covenant, the Davidic covenant, and the NT covenant. Throughout the book, B. provides in-depth exegeses and word studies. For example, on p. 111 he gives the semantic spectrum of yārēʾ words: terror, fright, anxiety, awe, reverence, submission, allegiance, trust. The book includes forty-three diagrams and twenty-two tables. Block understands the Noahic covenant as God saying, "I will establish my covenant [with the cosmos] with you" (p. 16). This is the case, B. argues, because the entire universe needs restoration because of Adam's fall. "The narrator [of Genesis] is silent concerning a reciprocal sign of commitment from the second party, but clearly that party is the earth itself" (p. 39). The rest of the First Testament does not let this vision of creation's renewal die (e.g., Hos 4:1–3; Jer 31:35–36). The author further maintains that the grammar of Gen 6:18—literally, "to establish, confirm a covenant"—implies that a preexisting covenant is already in place. This is the covenant God made with Adam. Among other texts to make his point, B. points to Hos 6:7: "But like Adam they transgressed the covenant; there they dealt faithlessly with me" (ESV). Following Genesis 11, God's covenant with Adam decreases while his covenant with Abram/Abraham takes center stage. "Instead of a triangular relationship involving God, the earth, and all living creatures, this relationship involved God, Israel, and the land of Canaan" (p. 68). After divine dealings with the patriarchs, the term "covenant" appears twentyeight additional times in the Pentateuch—the most important ones come at Sinai (Exodus 19–24), where God ordains Israel into priestly service for the sake of the world. Exodus 32–Leviticus 26 renews and completes this covenant. Forty years later, as narrated in the Book of Deuteronomy, Moses reaffirms it with Israel on the plains of Moab. The piel verb [End Page 482] in Deut 1:5, bēʾēr, means "to put into effect." It was necessary, B. contends, to reinstitute Sinai because the new generation of Israelites had not participated in the earlier covenant ratification. Upon entering the promised land, Israel repeatedly failed to hold up its part of the...
Read full abstract