Costs Of Standard Care Research Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Early Intervention in Psychosis: A Modeling Study.

Programs for early intervention in psychosis have shown clinical efficacy. The authors aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early intervention programs compared with standard care for the treatment of first-episode psychosis in the United States. A decision-analytic model integrating published data on clinical efficacy, costs, and health utilities was developed to evaluate early intervention versus standard care over the lifetime of patients after their first psychotic episode. Model input data were derived from meta-analyses, clinical trials, and U.S. national data. The main outcomes included hospitalizations, employment rate, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime health care costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Compared with patients receiving standard care, patients in the early intervention strategy had 3.2 fewer hospitalizations and 2.7 more years of employment over the course of their remaining life expectancy. From a health care perspective, early intervention had an ICER of approximately $51,600 per QALY. From a societal perspective, early intervention saved costs (i.e., yielded greater health benefits and had lower costs compared with standard care). Results were sensitive to the effect of early intervention on suicide, cost of standard care, cost of early intervention, and the effect (relative risk) of early intervention on employment. A scenario analysis that excluded the effect (i.e., hazard ratio) of early intervention on suicide yielded an ICER of approximately $197,000 per QALY. These results suggest that it is economically beneficial to fund early intervention in psychosis programs in the United States. The findings indicate that early intervention in psychosis saves costs (from the societal perspective) and is cost-effective (health care sector perspective).

A cost-minimization analysis comparing teledermoscopy and face-to-face evaluations of suspicious skin lesions in Southern Denmark.

Skin cancers are common in European populations and generate considerable costs. In Denmark, patients with suspicious skin lesions will usually consult their general practitioner who may refer the patient to a dermatologist or plastic surgeon if necessary. However, it is also possible for the general practitioner to take and send dermoscopic and macroscopic photographs of the suspicious skin lesion for evaluation by a dermatologist, so-called teledermoscopy. This study aims to calculate and compare costs of teledermoscopy and standard care in the form of face-to-face evaluation by a dermatologist of suspicious skin lesions referred by general practitioners in the Region of Southern Denmark. A cost-minimization study was performed. Investment costs, costs in general practice, hospital-associated costs and patient costs were included to calculate the average cost per patient episode. The overall cost of teledermoscopy was €17.2-€23.1 higher than that of standard care. However, hospital-associated costs and patient costs were reduced. The total cost of teledermoscopy was slightly higher than the cost of standard care. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the number of preventable face-to-face evaluations and the distance to the dermatologist were the two factors that influenced costs the most.

Budget Impact Analysis of Sacubitril Valsartan in the Treatment of Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) in Indonesia Setting

Based on PARADIGM-HF Clinical Trials, LCZ696 a dual-acting sodium supramolecular complex currently known as sacubitril/valsartan was superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This analysis aimed to estimate the budget impact of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of HFrEF in Indonesia setting. A budget impact model estimated the impact with and without use of sacubitril/valsartan for a 5-year horizon (2020 – 2024). The local data inputted in the model were including age prevalence rates, drugs costs, HF hospitalization cost, and adverse events costs. The drug cost calculation of sacubitril/valsartan was from regular price, while drugs costs of standard care were mostly coming from e-catalogue price which was reimbursement cost. The budget impact was estimated from the difference budget in which the target population is treated with the current therapy (without sacubitril/valsartan) and the future scenario in which the target population is treated with sacubitril/valsartan based on a market penetration rate of 6%, 12%, 18%, 24%, and 31% in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years, respectively. Given the number of patients eligible for treatment was estimated as 86,594 in the first year and assumption of annual increase of HF prevalence was 1.1% based on population growth, about 1,350 deaths and 3,512 hospitalizations may be avoided over 5 years. The scenario of implementing sacubitril/valsartan for HF treatment had an impact of additional budget of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5% over 5-year horizon compared to current therapy strategy and cumulative budget impact as IDR 735 Billion over 5 years. This analysis provides an estimation of the impact of sacubitril/valsartan application in the treatment of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction as input for Indonesia healthcare payer in implementing the strategy for HF treatment.

Cost impact of procalcitonin-guided decision making on duration of antibiotic therapy for suspected early-onset sepsis in neonates

BackgroundsThe large, international, randomized controlled NeoPInS trial showed that procalcitonin (PCT)-guided decision making was superior to standard care in reducing the duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization in neonates suspected of early-onset sepsis (EOS), without increased adverse events. This study aimed to perform a cost-minimization study of the NeoPInS trial, comparing health care costs of standard care and PCT-guided decision making based on the NeoPInS algorithm, and to analyze subgroups based on country, risk category and gestational age.MethodsData from the NeoPInS trial in neonates born after 34 weeks of gestational age with suspected EOS in the first 72 h of life requiring antibiotic therapy were used. We performed a cost-minimization study of health care costs, comparing standard care to PCT-guided decision making.ResultsIn total, 1489 neonates were included in the study, of which 754 were treated according to PCT-guided decision making and 735 received standard care. Mean health care costs of PCT-guided decision making were not significantly different from costs of standard care (€3649 vs. €3616). Considering subgroups, we found a significant reduction in health care costs of PCT-guided decision making for risk category ‘infection unlikely’ and for gestational age ≥ 37 weeks in the Netherlands, Switzerland and the Czech Republic, and for gestational age < 37 weeks in the Czech Republic.ConclusionsHealth care costs of PCT-guided decision making of term and late-preterm neonates with suspected EOS are not significantly different from costs of standard care. Significant cost reduction was found for risk category ‘infection unlikely,’ and is affected by both the price of PCT-testing and (prolonged) hospitalization due to SAEs.

Cost-minimization analysis of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator in adult patients undergoing ICD explant procedures: Clinical and economic implications.

AimsPatients with permanently increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) can be protected by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). If an ICD must be removed due to infection, for example, immediate reimplantation might not be possible or indicated. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is an established, safe and effective solution to protect patients from SCD during this high‐risk bridging period. Very few economic evaluations on WCD use are currently available.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review to evaluate the available evidence of WCD in patients undergoing ICD explant/lead extraction. Additionally, a decision model was developed to compare use and costs of the WCD with standard therapy (in‐hospital stay). For this purpose, a cost‐minimization analysis was conducted, and complemented by a one‐way sensitivity analysis.ResultsIn the base case scenario, the WCD was less expensive compared to standard therapy. The cost‐minimization analysis showed a cost reduction of €1782 per patient using the WCD. If costs of standard care were changed, cost savings associated with the WCD varied from €3500 to €0, assuming costs for standard care of €6800 to €3600.ConclusionAfter ICD explantation, patients can be safely and effectively protected from SCD after hospital discharge through WCD utilization. Furthermore, the use of a WCD for this patient group is cost saving when compared to standard therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure for acute respiratory failure: decision analytic modelling using data from a feasibility trial

BackgroundStandard prehospital management for Acute respiratory failure (ARF) involves controlled oxygen therapy. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a potentially beneficial alternative treatment, however, it is uncertain whether this could improve outcomes and provide value for money. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prehospital CPAP in ARF.MethodsA cost-utility economic evaluation was performed using a probabilistic decision tree model synthesising available evidence. The model consisted of a hypothetical cohort of patients in a representative ambulance service with undifferentiated ARF, receiving standard oxygen therapy or prehospital CPAP. Costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated using methods recommended by NICE.ResultsIn the base case analysis, using CPAP effectiveness estimates form the ACUTE trial, the mean expected costs of standard care and prehospital CPAP were £15,201 and £14,850 respectively and the corresponding mean expected QALYs were 1.190 and 1.128, respectively. The mean ICER estimated as standard oxygen therapy compared to prehospital CPAP was £5685 per QALY which indicated that standard oxygen therapy strategy was likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY (67% probability). The scenario analysis, using effectiveness estimates from an updated meta-analysis, suggested that prehospital CPAP was more effective (mean incremental QALYs of 0.157), but also more expensive (mean incremental costs of £1522), than standard care. The mean ICER, estimated as prehospital CPAP compared to standard care, was £9712 per QALY. At the £20,000 per QALY prehospital CPAP was highly likely to be the most cost-effective strategy (94%).ConclusionsCost-effectiveness of prehospital CPAP depends upon the estimate of effectiveness. When based on a small pragmatic feasibility trial, standard oxygen therapy is cost-effective. When based on meta-analysis of heterogeneous trials, CPAP is cost-effective. Value of information analyses support commissioning of a large pragmatic effectiveness trial, providing feasibility and plausibility conditions are met.

Costs and quality of care optimization in the remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). A picture from Veneto, Northern Italy

Abstract Background Remote control/monitoring (RC/M) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is still underutilized, with a significant heterogeneity of use across and within countries. Not all models are equivalent in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Purpose This cost comparative study aimed to analyse different models of following patients with CIEDs in three districts (four implanting facilities) merged into the same administrative area, to assess the impact of RC/M on expenditure, and to propose a common practice with the objectives of standardisation of approach, optimisation of efficiency, and future capillary implementation of RC/M. Methods The workload related to CIED-patient follow-ups was assessed in four public hospitals reflecting three different models with different proportions of patients followed by RC/M and different modus operandi. All CIED-patients in charge were scrutinized at 31/08/2019. The workload analysis was based on one-year data, collected retrospectively. Costs were calculated in terms of nursing and physician hours and based on public tariffs. Five variables, identified as drivers of costs, were tested by the simulation model. The main outcome was a total expenditure and cost per patient followed by RC/M compared to the standard care (SC) (in-office only). Results A total of 6830 patients with CIEDs were followed, 34.8% by RC/M (five platforms, 19.7% high voltage devices). An additional 25.8% had monitorable devices. The proportion of RC/M-patients across centres was 63.3%, 60.6%, 51% and 2.65%. RC/M resulted more costly than SC in all hospitals. Modelling demonstrated the overall cost in the year 2018 to be €228,075. No single factor optimisation tested separately (number of transmissions, nursing time for each transmission revision, doctor time for transmission processing, nursing time for phone calls, time for single enrolment) was able to reduce the cost per patient below the cost of SC. Providing monitoring to all compatible patients increased the costs of total care to €248,785. After the optimisation of other factors, the additional benefit of extending RC/M to compatible devices was achieved, with the final result of a total expenditure of €128,181 and of €15.97 per RC/M-patient per year vs. €27.93 per SC-patient, below the reimbursement tariff of monitoring recently approved in Veneto (€25.55 per patient/year). Conclusion Real-world data from an unselected population confirmed the huge inconsistency in managing patients with CIEDs. RC/M was associated with a significant specific workload. RC/M may be cost-saving compared to the standard in-office follow-up; however, organisation needs to be optimised. Improvement can be achieved by implementing new standards for RC/M procedures using Lean Management tools. A common platform might be of help. Centralisation could represent a further step to ensure high quality service and to save money at the same time. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Using Loss of Heterozygosity to Manage Premalignant Oral Dysplasia in British Columbia, Canada.

Management of low-grade oral dysplasias (LGDs) is complicated, as only a small percentage of lesions will progress to invasive disease. The current standard of care requires patients to undergo regular monitoring of their lesions, with intervention occurring as a response to meaningful clinical changes. Recent improvements in molecular technologies and understanding of the biology of LGDs may allow clinicians to manage lesions based on their genome-guided risk. We used a decision-analytic Markov model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified care using a genomic assay. In the experimental arm, patients with LGDs were managed according to their risk profile using the assay, with low- and intermediate-risk patients given longer screening intervals and high-risk patients immediately treated with surgery. Patients in the comparator arm had standard care (biannual follow-up appointments at an oral cancer clinic). Incremental costs and outcomes in life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were calculated based on the results in each arm. The mean cost of assay-guided management was $8,123 (95% confidence interval [CI] $2,973 to $23,062 in 2013 Canadian dollars) less than the cost of standard care. This difference was driven largely by reductions in resource use among people who did not develop cancer. Mean incremental effectiveness was 0.18 LYG (95% CI 0.08 to 0.39) or 0.64 QALY (95% CI 0.46 to 0.89). Sensitivity analysis suggests that these findings are robust to both expected and extreme variation in all parameter values. Use of the assay-guided management strategy costs less and is more effective than standard management of LGDs. The findings of this study strongly suggest that the use of a risk-stratification method such as a genomic assay can result in improved quality-adjusted survival outcomes for patients with low-grade oral dysplasia (LGD). The use of such an assay in this study provides "precision medicine," allowing for a change in follow-up frequency or early intervention as compared with current standard care. As genomic technologies become more common in cancer care, it is hoped that such an assay, once validated, will become part of a new model for the standard management of LGDs in similar health systems.

Cost and health consequences of treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis with ursodeoxycholic acid

Long-term use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the recommended therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The lifetime effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of UDCA in PBC have, however, not been assessed. To estimate the health outcomes and lifetime costs of a Norwegian cohort of PBC patients on UDCA. Norwegian PBC patients (n = 182) (90% females; mean age 56.3 ± 8.9 years; Mayo risk score 4.38) who were included in a 5-year open-label study of UDCA therapy were subsequently followed up for up to 11.5 years. The lifetime survival was estimated using a Weibull survival model. The survival benefit from UDCA was based on a randomised clinical trial from Canada, comparing the effect of non-UDCA and UDCA. Survival and costs of standard care vs. standard care plus UDCA were simulated in a Markov model with death and liver transplantation as major events, invoking transition of a patient's state in the model. The gain in life expectancy for a PBC patient on UDCA compared with standard care was 2.24 years (1.19 years discounted). The lifetime treatment costs were EUR 151,403 and EUR 157,741 (EUR 102,912 and EUR 115,031 discounted) for patients with and without UDCA respectively. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated an 82% probability that UDCA entails both greater life expectancy and lower costs than standard care. The results of this study indicate that UDCA therapy is a dominant strategy as it confers reduced morbidity and mortality, as well as cost savings, compared with standard therapy.

Deployment of an mHealth Patient Monitoring Solution for Diabetes—Improved Glucose Monitoring Leads to Reduction in Medical Expenditure

Although there is ample evidence that improved glucose control prevents long-term complications of diabetes, few reports have addressed the effect of improved control on short-term healthcare costs. Methods: A mobile health (mHealth)-enabled glucose meter combined with a disease management call center was deployed in 143 employees as part of an employer-sponsored diabetes disease management intervention. The program cost was approximately $50 per member per month over and above the cost of standard care. Results: Overall, on an intention-to-treat basis, this program was associated with an annual reduction of $1,595 (95% confidence interval [CI] –$2,827 to +$181) per person in incurred medical claims. A subanalysis documented that those who actively participated in the program (50 %) incurred a year-over-year claims cost decrease of $3,384 (95 % CI $643 to $5,149) compared with an increase of $282 among those who did not participate. Conclusions: These findings suggest that even partial improvement of diabetes testing adherence within an employed population may result in substantial attenuation of employee medical expense. The reduction in healthcare costs, even when considering those who did not comply, outweighed the program costs by several-fold.

Total cost comparison of standard antenatal care with a weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women

To perform a cost comparison of a weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women with standard antenatal care, and to identify if there were differences in healthcare costs within the intervention group related to degree of gestational weight gain or degree of obesity at programme entry. A comparison of mean healthcare costs for participants of an intervention study at antenatal care clinics with controls in south-east Sweden. In total, 155 women in an intervention group attempted to restrict their gestational weight gain to <7 kg. The control group comprised 193 women. Mean costs during pregnancy, delivery and the neonatal period were compared with the costs of standard care. Costs were converted from Swedish Kronor to Euros (€). Healthcare costs during pregnancy were lower in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in total healthcare costs (i.e. sum of costs during pregnancy, delivery and the neonatal period) between the intervention group and the control group. Within the intervention group, the subgroup that gained 4.5-9.5 kg had the lowest costs. The total cost, including intervention costs, was € 1283 more per woman/infant in the intervention group compared with the control group (P=0.025). The degree of obesity at programme entry had no bearing on the outcome. The weight gain restriction programme for obese pregnant women was effective in restricting gestational weight gain to <7 kg, but had a higher total cost compared with standard antenatal care.

COMPARISON OF MOLECULAR AND CONVENTIONAL STRATEGIES FOR FOLLOWUP OF SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CANCER USING DECISION ANALYSIS

Patients with superficial bladder cancer require long-term surveillance for recurrence. We compared the cost of cystoscopy and cytology (standard care) to that of urinary markers (modified care) for patients with a history of superficial bladder cancer. We constructed a decision analysis model that compared the 2 strategies for a hypothetical followup interval of 3 years. Probabilities required for the decision tree were based on a cohort of 361 patients diagnosed with superficial bladder cancer from 1987 to 1997. Sensitivity analyses were used to determine whether test sensitivity and specificity would affect cost thresholds. Costs for each strategy were then applied to actual practice patterns. The cost of modified care ranged from $158 to $228 for each followup visit when using a urinary marker with a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 77%, respectively. The cost of standard care was $240 for each followup visit. Based on sensitivity analyses the probability of disease recurrence and urinary marker accuracy were important determinants of expected costs. Mean number of followup assessments for patients followed more than 3 years was 4.3, 2.2 and 1.5 for years 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Cumulative costs of modified care were lower than those of standard care. Urinary marker testing for followup of patients with superficial bladder cancer is less expensive than the standard method of cystoscopy and urinary cytology based on our model. Future studies will be required to consider other factors that could affect the cost advantage of urinary markers, including indirect costs, the psychosocial impact of testing and different surveillance frequencies.

Does hospital-at-home make economic sense? Early discharge versus standard care for orthopaedic patients.

Hospital-at-home has been promoted as a potentially effective means of replacing costly inpatient care with cheaper domiciliary care. We studied three hospital-at-home schemes in West London providing intensive home care for early discharge orthopaedic patients, comparing their costs with those of standard inpatient care. Although costs per day of hospital-at-home care were lower than those of inpatient care, the schemes appeared to increase the total duration of orthopaedic episodes, so that the costs of standard care, per episode, were lower than those of hospital-at-home. While hospital-at-home may offer considerable future potential, substitution of home care for inpatient care will not necessarily save resources.

Is Albumin-based Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Justifiable? An Evidence from a Cost-effectiveness Evaluation

Fluid and antimicrobial therapy are the essential parts of sepsis management. The type of fluid to resuscitate with is an unsettled issue in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of albumin-based resuscitation over crystalloids. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by extracting data from a database of Sina Hospital, Islamic Republic of Iran. A decision tree was constructed by using Tree Age Pro 2011. The patients were grouped based on the types of fluids used for resuscitation into crystalloid alone or crystalloid + albumin groups at the initial decision node. The patients were followed from the onset of severe sepsis and septic shock upto 28 days. The healthcare payers' perspective was considered in constructing the model. The cost was measured in US dollars and the effectiveness was measured by life years gained. The addition of albumin during resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock has an effectiveness gain of 0.09 life years and cost increment of 495.00 USD. The estimated ICER for this analysis was 5500.00 USD per life year gained. The probability that albumin is cost-effective at one GDP per capita is 49.5%. Albumin-based resuscitation is not cost-effective in Iran when a GDP per capita was considered for a life year gain. The cost-effectiveness was insensitive to the cost of standard care. We recomend the caustious use albumin as per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline.