Cost-effectiveness Acceptability Curves Research Articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis of procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography guided antibiotic prescriptions in primary care.

Antimicrobial resistance comes with high morbidity and mortality burden, and ultimately high impact on healthcare and social costs. Efficient strategies are needed to limit antibiotic overuse. This paper investigates the cost-effectiveness of testing patients with lower respiratory tract infection with procalcitonin, either at the point-of-care only or combined with lung ultrasonography. These diagnostic tools help detect the presence of bacterial pneumonia, guiding prescription decisions. The clinical responses of these strategies were studied in the primary care setting. Evidence is needed on their cost-effectiveness. We used data from a cluster-randomized bi-centric clinical trial conducted in Switzerland and estimated patient-level costs using data on resource use to which we applied Swiss tariffs. Combining the incremental costs of the two strategies and the reduction in the 28-days antibiotic prescription rate (APR) compared to usual care, we calculated Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER). We also used the Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve as an analytical decision-making tool. The robustness of the findings is ensured by Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis and scenario analysis. In the base case scenario, the ICER compared to usual care is $2.3 per percentage point (pp) reduction in APR for the procalcitonin group, and $4.4 for procalcitonin-ultrasound combined. Furthermore, we found that for a willingness to pay per patient of more than $2 per pp reduction in the APR, procalcitonin is the strategy with the highest probability to be cost-effective. Our findings suggest that testing patients with respiratory symptoms with procalcitonin to guide antibiotic prescription in the primary care setting represents good value for money.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of a housing and recovery program for people with severe and persistent mental illnesses and precarious housing

ABSTRACT The Doorway program supports people with Serious and Persistent Mental Illnesses (SPMIs) receiving care within Victoria’s public mental health system and who are precariously housed. This paper reports on its cost-effectiveness. The study design was difference-in-differences involving a Treatment-As-Usual comparison group (TAU) using deidentified client records. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of days of secure housing per participant during the study and pre-study periods. Similarly, health service usage was also extracted from participants’ records. The cost of public mental health service usage was then estimated, including using governmental published data. The program’s Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) and Cost-effectiveness Acceptability Curve were estimated using the bootstrap method. An ICER threshold of Australian $50,000 per additional person housed (hereafter A$) at 100% was set to determine cost-effectiveness and the probability of cost effectiveness at A$50,000. Mean total costs (secure housing and mental health service usage) were greater for the Doorway group compared to the TAU group (A$22,987). Mean percentage of days securely housed was also greater for the Doorway group (by 45.4%). The ICER value was A$50,613, the probability of this being 83.1%. The Doorway intervention was both more costly and more effective. Its cost-effectiveness approximated the pre-specified ICER threshold.

Economic evaluation of Be a Mom, a web-based intervention to prevent postpartum depression in high-risk women alongside a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPostpartum depression (PPD) poses significant challenges, affecting both mothers and children, with substantial societal and economic implications. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy interventions (iCBT) offer promise in addressing PPD, but their economic impact remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of Be a Mom, a self-guided iCBT intervention, compared with a waiting-list control among postpartum women at high risk of PPD. MethodsThis economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 14-month randomized controlled trial adopting a societal perspective. Participants were randomized to Be a Mom (n = 542) or a waitlisted control group (n = 511). Self-report data on healthcare utilization, productivity losses, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 4 and 12 months post-intervention. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were generated using nonparametric bootstrapping. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess result robustness. ResultsOver 14 months, Be a Mom generated a QALY gain of 0.0184 (0.0022, 0.0346), and cost savings of EUR 34.06 (−176.16, 108.04) compared to the control group. At a willingness to pay of EUR 20,000, Be a Mom had a 97.6 % probability of cost-effectiveness. LimitationsResults have limitations due to self-selected sample, potential recall bias in self-reporting, missing data, limited follow-up, and the use of a waiting-list control group. ConclusionsThis study addresses a critical gap by providing evidence on the cost-utility of an iCBT intervention tailored for PPD prevention. Further research is essential to identify scalable and cost-effective interventions for reducing the burden of PPD.

Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus: economic evaluation of the TOBOGM study, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial

A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) "Treatment Of BOoking Gestational diabetes Mellitus" (TOBOGM: 2017-2022) found that the diagnosis and treatment of pregnant women with early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) improved pregnancy outcomes. Based on data from the trial, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early GDM (from <20 weeks') among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy compared with usual care (no treatment until 24-28 weeks') from a healthcare perspective. Participants' healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and cost-effectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (cost-saving) [-5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI:-10.1%,-1.2%),-$1373 (95% CI:-$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000-99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95-109mg/dl [5.3-6.0mmol/L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191mg/dl [10.6mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162-199mg/dl [9.0-11.0mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [-7.8% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI:-14.6%,-0.9%),-$2795 (95% CI:-$6,638,-$533)]; the intervention was more effective and tended to be less costly [-8.9% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI:-15.1%,-2.6%),-$5548 (95% CI:-$16,740, $1547)] among women diagnosed before 14 weeks' gestation as well. Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Long-term follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention. National Health and Medical Research Council (grants 1104231 and 2009326), Region O¨rebro Research Committee (grants Dnr OLL-970566 and OLL-942177), Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of Vienna (project 15,205 and project 23,026), South Western Sydney Local Health District Academic Unit (grant 2016), and Western Sydney University Ainsworth Trust Grant (2019).

Self-Administered Acupressure for Probable Knee Osteoarthritis in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

The effects of self-administered acupressure (SAA) on knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain remain unclear. To evaluate the effectiveness of SAA taught via a short training course on reducing knee OA pain in middle-aged and older adults. This randomized clinical trial was conducted among community-dwelling individuals in Hong Kong who were aged 50 years or older with probable knee OA from September 2019 to May 2022. The intervention included 2 training sessions for SAA with a brief knee health education (KHE) session, in which participants practiced acupressure twice daily for 12 weeks. The control group (KHE only) received only education about maintaining knee health on the same schedule and duration. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at 12 weeks. Other outcomes included Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D), Timed Up and Go, and Fast Gait Speed tests. A total of 314 participants (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [4.5] years; 246 [78.3%] female; mean [SD] knee pain duration, 7.3 [7.6] years) were randomized into intervention and KHE-only groups (each 157). At week 12, compared with the KHE-only group, the intervention group had a significantly greater reduction in NRS pain score (mean difference [MD], -0.54 points; 95% CI, -0.97 to -0.10 points; P = .02) and higher enhancement in SF-6D utility score (MD, 0.03 points; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.01 points; P = .03) but did not have significant differences in other outcome measures. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve demonstrated a greater than 90% probability that the intervention is cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of 1 GDP per capita. In this randomized clinical trial, SAA with a brief KHE program was efficacious and cost-effective in relieving knee pain and improving mobility in middle-aged and older adults with probable knee OA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04191837.

Cost-effectiveness of the FindMyApps eHealth intervention vs. digital care as usual: results from a randomised controlled trial

Objectives Despite growing interest, the cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions for supporting quality of life of people with dementia and their caregivers remains unclear. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the FindMyApps intervention, compared to digital care-as-usual. FindMyApps aims to help people with dementia and their caregivers find and learn to use tablet apps that may support social participation and self-management of people with dementia and sense of competence of caregivers. Method A randomised controlled trial (Netherlands Trial Register NL8157) was conducted, including people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia and their informal caregivers (FindMyApps n = 76, digital care-as-usual n = 74). Outcomes for people with MCI/dementia were Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs), calculated from EQ-5D-5L data and the Dutch tariff for utility scores, social participation (Maastricht Social Participation Profile) and quality of life (Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit), and for caregivers, QALYs and sense of competence (Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire). Societal costs were calculated using data collected with the RUD-lite instrument and the Dutch costing guideline. Multiple imputation was employed to fill in missing cost and effect data. Bootstrapped multilevel models were used to estimate incremental total societal costs and incremental effects between groups which were then used to calculate Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were estimated. Results In the FindMyApps group, caregiver SSCQ scores were significantly higher compared to care-as-usual, n = 150, mean difference = 0.75, 95% CI [0.14, 1.38]. Other outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Total societal costs for people with dementia were not significantly different, n = 150, mean difference = €-774, 95%CI [–2.643, .,079]. Total societal costs for caregivers were significantly lower in the FindMyApps group compared to care-as-usual, n = 150, mean difference = € −392, 95% CI [−1.254, −26], largely due to lower supportive care costs, mean difference = €−252, 95% CI [−1.009, 42]. For all outcomes, the probability that FindMyApps was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €0 per point of improvement was 0.72 for people with dementia and 0.93 for caregivers. Conclusion FindMyApps is a cost-effective intervention for supporting caregivers’ sense of competence. Further implementation of FindMyApps is warranted.

Cost-effectiveness of methenamine hippurate compared with antibiotic prophylaxis for the management of recurrent urinary tract infections in secondary care: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial

ObjectivesTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of methenamine hippurate compared with antibiotic prophylaxis in the management of recurrent urinary tract infections.DesignMulticentre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.SettingEight centres in the UK, recruiting from June...

Economic evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme in Cumbria, UK.

The addition of fluoride to community drinking water supplies has been a long-standing public health intervention to improve dental health. However, the evidence of cost-effectiveness in the UK currently lacks a contemporary focus, being limited to a period with higher incidence of caries. A water fluoridation scheme in West Cumbria, United Kingdom, provided a unique opportunity to study the contemporary impact of water fluoridation. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation over a 5-6 years follow-up period in two distinct cohorts: children exposed to water fluoridation in utero and those exposed from the age of 5. Cost-effectiveness was summarized employing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER, cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained). Costs included those from the National Health Service (NHS) and local authority perspective, encompassing capital and running costs of water fluoridation, as well as NHS dental activity. The measure of health benefit was the QALY, with utility determined using the Child Health Utility 9-Dimension questionnaire. To account for uncertainty, estimates of net cost and outcomes were bootstrapped (10 000 bootstraps) to generate cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analysis performed with alternative specifications. There were 306 participants in the birth cohort (189 and 117 in the non-fluoridated and fluoridated groups, respectively) and 271 in the older school cohort (159 and 112, respectively). In both cohorts, there was evidence of small gains in QALYs for the fluoridated group compared to the non-fluoridated group and reductions in NHS dental service cost that exceeded the cost of fluoridation. For both cohorts and across all sensitivity analyses, there were high probabilities (>62%) of water fluoridation being cost-effective with a willingness to pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY. This analysis provides current economic evidence that water fluoridation is likely to be cost-effective. The findings contribute valuable contemporary evidence in support of the economic viability of water fluoridation scheme.

Economic evaluation of a trial exploring the effects of a web-based support tool for parents of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

To explore the cost-effectiveness of a web-based support tool for parents of children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. A multi-centred randomised controlled trial was conducted in paediatric rheumatology centres in England. The WebParC intervention consisted of online information about JIA and its treatment and a toolkit using cognitive-behavioural therapy principles to support parents manage their child's JIA. An economic evaluation was performed alongside the trial involving 220 parents. The primary outcome was the self-report Pediatric Inventory for Parents measure of illness-related parenting stress, with two dimensions; difficulty and frequency. These measures along with costs were assessed post intervention at 4 months and 12 months. Costs were calculated for healthcare usage using a UK NHS economic perspective. Data was collected and analysed on the impact of caring costs on families. Uncertainty around cost effectiveness was explored using bootstrapping and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. The intervention arm showed improved average Pediatric Inventory for Parents scores for the dimensions of frequency and difficulty, of 1.5 and 3.6 respectively at 4 months and. 0.35 and 0.39 at 12 months, representing improved PIP scores for the intervention arm. At both 4 and 12 month follow up the average total cost per case was higher in the control group when compared with the intervention arm with mean differences of £360 (95% CI £29.6 to £691) at 4 months and £203 (95% CI £16 to £390) at 12 months. The probability of the intervention being cost effective ranged between 49% and 54%. The WebParC intervention led to reductions in primary and secondary healthcare resource use and costs at 4 and 12 months. The intervention demonstrated particular savings for rheumatology services at both follow ups. Future economies of scale could be realised by health providers with increased opportunities for cost effectiveness over time. ISRCTN, ISRCTN13159730.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of expectant vs active management for treatment of persistent pregnancies of unknown location

BackgroundPersistent pregnancies of unknown location (PUL) are defined by abnormally trending serum human chorionic gonadotropin with nondiagnostic ultrasound. There is no consensus on optimal management. ObjectiveThis study was designed to assess the cost-effectiveness between three primary management strategies for persistent pregnancies of unknown location: (1) expectant management, (2) empirical two-dose methotrexate, (3) uterine evacuation followed by methotrexate, if indicated. Study DesignWe conducted a prospective economic evaluation performed concurrently with the Expectant versus Active Management for Treatment of Persistent Pregnancies of Unknown Location (ACT or NOT) multicenter randomized trial conducted from July 2014 to June 2019. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to expectant management, two-dose methotrexate, or uterine evacuation. The analysis was from the healthcare sector perspective with a 6-week time horizon following randomization. Costs were expressed in 2018 U.S. dollars. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the rate of salpingectomy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were generated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the analysis. ResultsMethotrexate had the lowest mean cost, $875, followed by expectant management $1085, and uterine evacuation $1902 (p=0.001). Expectant management had the highest mean QALY (0.1043) followed by methotrexate (0.1031) and uterine evacuation (0.0992) (p=0.0001). Salpingectomy rate was higher for expectant management compared to methotrexate (9.4% vs 1.2%; p=0.02) and expectant management compared to uterine evacuation (9.4% vs 8.1%; p=0.04). Uterine evacuation, with highest costs and lowest QALYs, was dominated by both expectant management and methotrexate. In the base case analysis, expectant management was not cost-effective compared to methotrexate at a willingness-to-pay of $150,000/QALY given an ICER of $175,083/QALY gained (95% CI, -$1,666,825-2,676,375). Threshold analysis demonstrated methotrexate administration would have to cost $214 (an increase of $16 or 8%) to favor expectant management. Expectant management would also be favorable in lower risk patient populations with rates of laparoscopic surgical management for ectopic pregnancy not exceeding 4% of pregnancies of unknown location. Based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, the probability expectant management was cost-effective compared to methotrexate at a willingness-to-pay of $150,000/QALY gained was 50%. Results were dependent on the cost of surgical intervention, and the expected rate of methotrexate failure. ConclusionManagement of pregnancies of unknown location with a two-dose methotrexate protocol may be cost-effective compared to expectant management and uterine evacuation. While uterine evacuation was dominated, expectant management versus methotrexate results were sensitive to modest changes in treatment costs of both methotrexate and surgical management.

Cost-utility analysis of sequential therapy with sorafenib followed by regorafenib versus single-line therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

529 Background: Regorafenib is the only licensed second-line therapy available for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that progress on first-line sorafenib in the UK. We evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of a sequence of treatment with sorafenib followed by regorafenib (SOR-REG) compared with licensed single-line therapies for which there is no clear sequencing options available, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATEZO+BEV), which has become the standard of care in first-line treatment, as well as lenvatinib (LEN), followed by best supportive care (BSC). Methods: Assuming a UK National Health Service and Social Services perspective, we developed a probabilistic individual-level semi-Markov model with states reflecting progression-free survival, progression following first-line treatment, further progression following second-line treatment, and death. First-line overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were informed by fractional polynomials network meta-analysis of published trials. Individual patient data from a phase 3 trial (RESORCE) on regorafenib and BSC informed OS and PFS in the second-line setting. Costs and utilities were sourced from published studies. Cost-effectiveness was summarized using incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), which could be positive or negative depending on direction of expected benefit associated with SOR-REG, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. Results: We found 1000 probabilistic samples and 1000 patients were sufficient for convergence. Lifetime costs were highest with ATEZO-BEV ([£80,963 [95% CI: £11,022, £97,369]), followed by SOR-REG (£38,373 [£31,064, £43,420]) and LEN (£37,351 [£5,020, £55,800]). Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were highest with ATEZO+BEV (1.021 [0.152, 1.239), followed by SOR-REG (0.942 [0.802, 1.057]) and LEN (0.755, [0.094, 1.092]). At a WTP threshold of £30,000 / QALY gained, SOR-REG had an INMB of £40,211 (95% CI -£2,099, £52,731) and £4,589 (-£8,044, £14,481) versus ATEZO+BEV and LEN, respectively. Conclusions: A sequence of SOR-REG for patients with advanced HCC is cost-effective at WTP thresholds of £30,000 / QALY gained due to lower lifetime costs and broadly comparable QALY gains with single-line ATEZO-BEV and LEN in the UK. Broader second-line treatment options are needed for patients receiving ATEZO+BEV and LEN as first-line therapies.

Cost-effectiveness of behavioral activation compared to treatment as usual for depressed older adults in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial

IntroductionDepression in older adults is associated with decreased quality of life and increased utilization of healthcare services. Behavioral activation (BA) is an effective treatment for late-life depression, but the cost-effectiveness compared to treatment as usual (TAU) is unknown. MethodsAn economic evaluation was performed alongside a cluster randomized controlled multicenter trial including 161 older adults (≥65 years) with moderate to severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Outcome measures were depression (response on the QIDS-SR), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and societal costs. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Cost and effect differences were estimated using bivariate linear regression models, and statistical uncertainty was estimated with bootstrapping. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed the probability of cost-effectiveness at different ceiling ratios. ResultsSocietal costs were statistically non-significantly lower in BA compared to TAU (mean difference (MD) -€485, 95 % CI -3861 to 2792). There were no significant differences in response on the QIDS-SR (MD 0.085, 95 % CI -0.015 to 0.19), and QALYs (MD 0.026, 95 % CI -0.0037 to 0.055). On average, BA was dominant over TAU (i.e., more effective and less expensive), although the probability of dominance was only 0.60 from the societal perspective and 0.85 from the health care perspective for both QIDS-SR response and QALYs. DiscussionAlthough the results suggest that BA is dominant over TAU, there was considerable uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness estimates which precludes firm conclusions.

Cost-effectiveness of testosterone treatment utilising individual patient data from randomised controlled trials in men with low testosterone levels.

Testosterone is safe and highly effective in men with organic hypogonadism, but worldwide testosterone prescribing has recently shifted towards middle-aged and older men, mostly with low testosterone related to age, diabetes and obesity, for whom there is less established evidence of clinical safety and benefit. The value of testosterone treatment in middle-aged and older men with low testosterone is yet to be determined. We therefore evaluated the cost-effectiveness of testosterone treatment in such men with low testosterone compared with no treatment. A cost-utility analysis comparing testosterone with no treatment was conducted following best practices in decision modelling. A cohort Markov model incorporating relevant care pathways for individuals with hypogonadism was developed for a 10-year-time horizon. Clinical outcomes were obtained from an individual patient meta-analysis of placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised studies. Three starting age categories were defined: 40, 60 and 75 years. Cost utility (quality-adjusted life years) accrued and costs of testosterone treatment, monitoring and cardiovascular complications were compared to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for selected scenarios. Ten-year excess treatment costs for testosterone compared with non-treatment ranged between £2306 and £3269 per patient. Quality-adjusted life years results depended on the instruments used to measure health utilities. Using Beck depression index-derived quality-adjusted life years data, testosterone was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <£20,000) for men aged <75 years, regardless of morbidity and mortality sensitivity analyses. Testosterone was not cost-effective in men aged >75 years in models assuming increased morbidity and/or mortality. Our data suggest that testosterone is cost-effective in men <75 years when Beck depression index-derived quality-adjusted life years data are considered; cost-effectiveness in men >75 years is dependent on cardiovascular safety. However, more robust and longer-term cost-utility data are needed to verify our conclusion.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Community-Based Telewellness Weight Loss Program

The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Koa Family Program, a community-based telewellness weight reduction intervention for overweight and obese women aged 21-45 years with low income. The Koa Family Program resulted in an approximately 8-pound weight loss as demonstrated in an RCT published previously. Estimates for the cost-effectiveness were derived from the prospective 25-week RCT including 70 women (25 kg/m2≤BMI<40 kg/m2). The analysis was from a program-funder perspective. Base case costs, as well as low and high scenario costs, were estimated from the services provided to intervention participants. The incremental costs were compared with the incremental effectiveness, with weight loss being the outcome of interest. Costs were in 2021 U.S. dollars. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the incremental net benefit. The statistical uncertainty was characterized using an incremental net benefit by willingness-to-pay plot and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The base case average cost per participant was $564.39. The low and high scenario average costs per participant were $407.34 and $726.22, respectively. Over the 25-week study timeframe, participants lost an average 7.7 pounds, yielding a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately $73 per extra pound lost. The probability that the Koa Family Program is cost-effective is 90%, assuming a willingness-to-pay of $115 for a 1-pound reduction, and is 95%, assuming a willingness-to-pay of $140. The Koa Family Program provides good value with cost-effectiveness in line with other weight-loss interventions. This is a striking finding given that the Koa Family Program serves a more vulnerable population than is typically engaged in weight loss research studies.

Cost-effectiveness of a primary healthcare intervention to treat male lower urinary tract symptoms: the TRIUMPH cluster randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) compared with usual care.DesignEconomic evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial from a UK...

Cost-effectiveness analysis of adult living-donor liver transplantation in Japan.

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a highly effective life-saving procedure; however, it requires substantial medical resources, and the cost-effectiveness of LDLT versus conservative management (CM) for adult patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) remains unclear in Japan. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis using the Diagnostic Procedure Combination (DPC) data from the nationwide database of the DPC research group. We selected adult patients (18years or older) who were admitted or discharged between 2010 and 2021 with a diagnosis of ESLD with Child-Pugh class C or B. A decision tree and Markov model were constructed, and all event probabilities were computed in 3-month cycles over a 10-year period. The willingness-to-pay per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was set at 5 million Japanese yen (JPY) (49,801 US dollars [USD]) from the perspective of the public health-care payer. After propensity score matching, we identified 1297 and 111,849 patients in the LDLT and CM groups, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for LDLT versus CM for Child-Pugh classes C and B was 2.08 million JPY/QALY (20,708 USD/QALY) and 5.24 million JPY/QALY (52,153 USD/QALY), respectively. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed the probabilities of being below the willingness-to-pay of 49,801 USD/QALY as 95.4% in class C and 48.5% in class B. Tornado diagrams revealed all variables in class C were below 49,801 USD/QALY while their ranges included or exceeded 49,801 USD/QALY in class B. Living-donor liver transplantation for adult patients with Child-Pugh class C was cost-effective compared with CM, whereas LDLT versus CM for class B patients was not cost-effective in Japan.

Cost-effectiveness of a tablet-based intervention to support social health in dementia: results from the FindMyApps randomized controlled trial

Objective:Scalable, cost-effective interventions to support social health in dementia are required to address growing prevalence in the face of healthcare workforce shortfalls. Until now, very few high quality studies have addressed the effectiveness of assistive technologies for social health in dementia, and almost none have evaluated the cost-effectiveness. Effectiveness of the FindMyApps intervention was investigated and an economic evaluation was undertaken.Method:A single-centre, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted, comparing the effectiveness of FindMyApps with a digital care as usual control intervention (normal tablet computer with general advice). Primary outcomes measured at baseline and three month follow-up were social participation and self-management of community-dwelling people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early stage dementia (MMSE 18-25), and sense of competence of their informal caregiver. Healthcare usage data was collected using a modified version of the RUD-lite instrument. Incremental costs and effectiveness associated with FindMyApps compared to the control intervention were estimated.Results:Data collection was completed in November 2022. Of 150 dyads randomized, follow-up data wereavailable from 128 dyads (14.7% loss to follow-up). The dataset has been cleaned and analyses are ongoing. Alongside main effects on primary outcomes, both a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost- utility analysis will be reported, from a societal and healthcare perspective. Cost and effect differences between FindMyApps and digital care as usual will be estimated with bivariate regression analyses and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be reported (the difference in the mean total costs between the groups divided by the difference in mean effect between the groups). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will demonstrate the probability that FindMyApps is cost-effective compared to digital care as usual.Conclusion:The results of this study establish the extent to which FindMyApps is effective and cost-effective for supporting social health in dementia. Implications for healthcare professionals, researchers and policymakers with respect to further implementation of FindMyApps are highlighted, as well as remaining uncertainty and directions for future research. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale (cost-)effectiveness evaluations with assistive technology, which should be replicated as gold-standard evidence for other technologies and health priorities.

Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted spinal surgery: A single-center retrospective study

ObjectiveRobotic-assisted spine surgeries (RASS) have been shown to enhance precision, reduce operative time, prevent complications, facilitate minimally invasive spinal surgery, and decrease revision surgery rates, leading to improved patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of RASS and non-robotic-assisted surgery for degenerative spine disease at a single center. MethodsThis retrospective study, including 122 patients, was conducted at a single center from March 2015 to February 2022. Patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery were assigned to the robot group, and patients who underwent non-robotic-assisted surgery were assigned to the non-robot group. Various data, including demographic information, surgical details, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness, were collected for both groups. The cost-effectiveness was determined using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with 1 or 2 levels of spinal instrumentation. The analysis was performed using STATA SE version 15 and TreeAge Pro 2020, with Monte Carlo simulations for the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. ResultsThe overall ICER was $22,572, but it decreased to $16,980 when considering cases with only 1 or 2 levels of instrumentation. RASS is deemed cost-effective when the willingness to pay is $3000–$4000 if less than 2 levels of the spine are instrumented. ConclusionsThe cost-effectiveness of robotic assistance becomes apparent when there is a reduced need for open surgeries, leading to decreased revision rates caused by complications such as misplaced screws or infections. Therefore, it is advisable to allocate healthcare budget resources to spine robots, as RASS proves to be cost-effective, particularly when only two or fewer spinal levels require instrumentation.

Cost-utility of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Italy.

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a device therapy for heart failure, based on the delivery of high-voltage biphasic impulses to the right ventricular septum during the myocardial absolute refractory period. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CCM therapy plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) vs. OMT alone in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. A Markov model with a lifespan time horizon was developed to assess the cost-utility using the FIX trials as main data sources. A deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were run to analyse the decision uncertainty in the model through cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) and cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier (CEAF). Value of information analysis was also conducted computing the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and the expected value of partial perfect information. The base case results showed that the CCM plus OMT option was highly cost-effective compared with OMT alone with an incremental cost-utility ratio of €7034/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The CEAC and CEAF illustrated that for all willingness to pay levels above €5600/QALY, tested up to €50000/QALY, CCM plus OMT alternative had the highest probability of being cost-effective. The EVPI per patient was estimated to be €124412 on a willingness to pay threshold of €30000/QALY. For patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, CCM therapy could be cost-effective when taking a lifetime horizon. Further long-term, post-approval clinical studies are needed to verify these results in a real-world context, particularly concerning the effect of CCM therapy on mortality.

Protocol for an economic evaluation of scalable strategies to improve mental health among perinatal women: non-specialist care delivered via telemedicine vs. specialist care delivered in-person

BackgroundPerinatal depression affects an estimated 1 in 5 women in North America during the perinatal period, with annualized lifetime costs estimated at $20.6 billion CAD in Canada and over $45.9 billion USD in the US. Access to psychological treatments remains limited for most perinatal women suffering from depression and anxiety. Some barriers to effective care can be addressed through task-sharing to non-specialist providers and through telemedicine platforms. The cost-effectiveness of these strategies compared to traditional specialist and in-person models remains unknown. This protocol describes an economic evaluation of non-specialist providers and telemedicine, in comparison to specialist providers and in-person sessions within the ongoing Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) trial.MethodsThe economic evaluation will be undertaken alongside the SUMMIT trial. SUMMIT is a pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial across five North American study sites (N = 1,226) of the comparable effectiveness of two types of providers (specialist vs. non-specialist) and delivery modes (telemedicine vs. in-person) of a behavioural activation treatment for perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms. The primary economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis. The outcome will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which will be expressed as the additional cost required to achieve an additional quality-adjusted life-year, as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument. A secondary cost-effectiveness analysis will use participants’ depressive symptom scores. A micro-costing analysis will be conducted to estimate the resources/costs required to implement and sustain the interventions; healthcare resource utilization will be captured via self-report. Data will be pooled and analysed using uniform price and utility weights to determine cost-utility across all trial sites. Secondary country-specific cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will also be completed. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted, and cost-effectiveness acceptability-curves will be generated, in all instances.DiscussionResults of this study are expected to inform key decisions related to dissemination and scale up of evidence-based psychological interventions in Canada, the US, and possibly worldwide. There is potential impact on real-world practice by informing decision makers of the long-term savings to the larger healthcare setting in services to support perinatal women with common mental health conditions.