Cost-conscious Care Research Articles

Empowering Medical Students to Practice High-Value Care

Over the last decade, initiatives like the Choosing Wisely campaign have promoted the practice of evidence-based, cost-conscious care. However, education surrounding value in medicine has been largely restricted to graduate-level medical education or post-clerkship undergraduate medical education. Here, we present a mixed-methods study evaluating pre-clerkship medical student engagement with and response to new value-based curricular initiatives to assess whether high-value care (HVC) can be introduced successfully earlier in training. Initiatives were introduced into the pre-clerkship clinical curriculum without major alterations to the established curricular structure. These comprised an annual event devoted to self-reflecting on HVC observed in prior and current clinical experiences and subsequent small-group facilitated discussion. Engagement with and response to these initiatives were analyzed for two whole-class cohorts using an abductive, progressive focusing approach complementing quantitative survey data. Baseline familiarity with HVC and post-event response to the annual event was higher and more positive, respectively, among responders from the Class of 2025 compared with those from the Class of 2024. Analysis of reflection essays revealed the emergence of five primary themes differentiating the two class years: (1) understanding HVC, (2) addressing barriers to HVC, (3) medical waste and underserved communities, (4) patient–physician relationship and value, and (5) self-reflection. Evaluation of thematic patterns in light of survey response data suggests that early clinical exposure combined with intentional self-reflection could promote engagement with HVC topics in a way that shapes students’ foundational understanding of the practice of medicine.

Increasing High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care Family Rounding Discussions Via an Educational Rounding Tool.

Family-centered rounds (FCR) are an important time to engage in high-value, cost-conscious care (HV3C) discussions. However, research suggests HV3C conversations occur in a minority of FCRs. Best-practice support tools can improve provider performance, but no research has evaluated whether an HV3C-focused tool may increase pediatricians' HV3C FCR discussions. This study aimed to assess if an educational and practice-based HV3C Rounding Tool's introduction would increase providers' HV3C FCR performance and competence. This study involved a hospitalist teaching service at a tertiary-care hospital. Evidence-based HV3C Rounding Tool and Quick Reference interventions were designed for use on FCRs, using a validated tool to measure baseline and postintervention HV3C performance. Underlying family, nursing presence/participation, and other factors' impacts upon HV3C performance were also explored. Anonymous baseline and postintervention surveys compared providers' perceived competence and comfort engaging families in HV3C discussions, as well as the tools' usefulness. Out of the 197 baseline and 157 intervention encounters recorded, the tools respectively increased from 3.8 to 5.8 HV3C performance measures addressed (P < .001), with 80% of performance measures showing significant improvement (P < .002). Aside from family presence for select performance measures, the tools had an independent, significant, positive effect upon HV3C performance. Users generally reported the tools as helpful and easy to use, noting significant increases in faculty role-modeling and trainee competence practicing HV3C. Introduction of HV3C Rounding and Quick Reference tools were generally perceived as helpful and beneficial, resulting in an increase of providers' HV3C discussions and care delivery during FCRs.

Implementing high-value, cost-conscious care: experiences of Irish doctors and the role of education in facilitating this approach

BackgroundAdopting high-value, cost-conscious care (HVCCC) principles into medical education is growing in importance due to soaring global healthcare costs and the recognition that efficient care can enhance patient outcomes and control costs. Understanding the current opportunities and challenges doctors face concerning HVCCC in healthcare systems is crucial to tailor education to doctors’ needs. Hence, this study aimed to explore medical students, junior doctors, and senior doctors’ experiences with HVCCC, and to seek senior doctors’ viewpoints on how education can foster HVCCC in clinical environments.MethodsUsing a mixed-methods design, our study involved a cross-sectional survey using the Maastricht HVCCC-Attitude Questionnaire (MHAQ), with a subset of consultants engaging in semi-structured interviews. Descriptive analysis provided insights into both categorical and non-categorical variables, with differences examined across roles (students, interns, junior doctors, senior doctors) via Kruskal-Wallis tests, supplemented by two-group analyses using Mann-Whitney U testing. We correlated experience with MHAQ scores using Spearman’s rho, tested MHAQ’s internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha, and employed thematic analysis for the qualitative data.ResultsWe received 416 responses to the survey, and 12 senior doctors participated in the semi-structured interviews. Overall, all groups demonstrated moderately positive attitudes towards HVCCC, with more experienced doctors exhibiting more favourable views, especially about integrating costs into daily practice. In the interviews, participants agreed on the importance of instilling HVCCC values during undergraduate teaching and supplementing it with a formal curriculum in postgraduate training. This, coupled with practical knowledge gained on-the-job, was seen as a beneficial strategy for training doctors.ConclusionsThis sample of medical students and hospital-based doctors display generally positive attitudes towards HVCCC, high-value care provision, and the integration of healthcare costs, suggesting receptiveness to future HVCCC training among students and doctors. Experience is a key factor in HVCCC, so early exposure to these concepts can potentially enhance practice within existing healthcare budgets.

Factors Associated with Medical Students' Attitudes About Cost-Conscious Care: A Mixed-Methods Multi-school Study.

Because physician practices contribute to national healthcare expenditures, initiatives aimed at educating physicians about high-value cost-conscious care (HVCCC) are important. Prior studies suggest that the training environment influences physician attitudes and behaviors towards HVCCC. To explore the relationship between medical student experiences and HVCCC attitudes. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of a multi-institutional survey. Medical students from nine US medical schools. A 44-item survey that included the Maastricht HVCCC Attitudes Questionnaire, a validated tool for assessing HVCCC attitudes, was administered electronically. Attitudinal domains of high-value care (HVC), cost incorporation (CI), and perceived drawbacks (PD) were compared using one-way ANOVA among students with a range of exposures. Open text responses inviting participants to reflect on their attitudes were analyzed using classical content analysis. A total of 740 students completed the survey (response rate 15%). Students pursuing a "continuity-oriented" specialty held more favorable attitudes towards HVCCC than those pursuing "technique-oriented" specialties (HVC sub-score = 3.20 vs. 3.06; p = 0.005, CI sub-score = 2.83 vs. 2.74; p < 0.001). Qualitative analyses revealed personal, educational, and professional experiences shape students' HVCCC attitudes, with similar experiences interpreted differently leading to both more and less favorable attitudes. Students pursuing specialties with longitudinal patient contact may be more enthusiastic about practicing high-value care. Life experiences before and during medical school shape these attitudes, and complex interactions between these forces drive student perceptions of HVCCC.

More problems, more money: Identifying and predicting high-cost rescue after colorectal surgery

BackgroundSuccessful rescue after elective surgery is associated with increased healthcare costs, but costs vary widely. Treating all rescue events the same may overlook targeted opportunities for improvement. The purpose of this study was to predict high-cost rescue after elective colorectal surgery. MethodsWe identified adult patients in the National Inpatient Sample (2016–2021) who underwent elective colectomy or proctectomy. Rescued patients were defined as those who underwent additional major procedures. Three groups were stratified: 1) uneventful recovery; 2) Low-cost rescue; 3) High-cost rescue. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to identify preoperative clinical predictors of high-cost versus low-cost rescue. ResultsWe identified 448,590 elective surgeries, and rescued patients composed 4.8 %(21,635) of the total sample. The median increase in costs in rescued patients was $25,544(p < 0.001). Median total inpatient costs were $95,926 in the most expensive rescued versus $34,811 in the less expensive rescued versus $16,751 in the uneventfully discharged(p < 0.001). When comparing the secondary procedures between the less expensive and most expensive rescued groups, the most expensive had an increased proportion of reoperation (73.4 % versus 53.0 %,p < 0.001). When controlling for other factors and stratification by congestive heart failure due to an interaction effect, a reoperation was independently associated with high-cost rescue (RR with CHF = 3.29,95%CI:2.69–4.04; RR without CHF = 2.29,95%CI:1.97–2.67). ConclusionsHigh-cost rescue after colorectal surgery is associated with disproportionately greater healthcare utilization and reoperation. For cost-conscious care, preemptive strategies that reduce reoperation-related complications can be prioritized.

A novel virtual course to teach medical students high-value decision-making.

Although a clinician's ability to employ high-value decision-making is influenced by training, many undergraduate medical education programmes lack a formal curriculum in high-value, cost-conscious care. We present a curriculum developed through a cross-institutional collaboration that was used to teach students at two institutions about this topic and can serve as a framework for other institutions to develop similar curricula. The faculty from the University of Virginia and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine created a 2-week-long online course to teach medical students the fundamentals of high-value care. The course consisted of learning modules, clinical cases, textbook studies, journal clubs and a competitive 'Shark Tank' final project where students proposed a realistic intervention to promote high-value clinical care. Over two-thirds of students rated the course's quality as excellent or very good. Most found the online modules (92%), assigned textbook readings (89%) and 'Shark Tank' competition (83%) useful. To evaluate the student's ability to apply the concepts learned during the course in clinical contexts, we developed a scoring rubric based on the New World Kirkpatrick Model to evaluate students' proposals. Groups chosen as finalists (as determined by faculty judges) were more likely to be fourth-year students (56%), achieved higher overall scores (p = 0.03), better incorporated cost impact at several levels (patient, hospital and national) (p = 0.001) and discussed both positive and negative impacts on patient safety (p = 0.04). This course provides a framework for medical schools to use in their teaching of high-value care. Cross-institutional collaboration and online content overcame local barriers such as contextual factors and lack of faculty expertise, allowed for greater flexibility, and enabled focused curricular time to be spent on a capstone project competition. Prior clinical experience amongst medical students may be an enabling factor in promoting application of learning related to high-value care.

‘But what if you miss something …?’: factors that influence medical student consideration of cost in decision making

ContextCost-conscious care is critical for healthcare sustainability but evidence suggests that most doctors do not consider cost in their clinical decision making. A critical step in changing this is understanding the barriers to encouraging behaviours and attitudes related to cost-conscious care. We therefore conducted a qualitative study to address the research question: what factors influence consideration of cost in emergency medicine (ED) clinical decision making?MethodsThis was a qualitative focus group study using patient vignettes to explore attitudes towards cost-conscious clinical decision making. Participants were Year 4 and Year 5 medical students from Singapore, a country with a fee-for-service healthcare system. After a data-driven initial data analysis, and to make sense of a multitude of factors impacting on cost conscious care, we selected Fishbein’s integrative model of behavioural prediction to underpin secondary data analysis.ResultsVia four focus groups with 21 participants, we identified five main themes relevant to the integrative model of behavioural prediction. These were: attitudes towards considering cost when managing a patient (e.g., “better safe than sorry”); normative beliefs (e.g., doing what others do, perceptions of patient wishes); efficacy beliefs (e.g., no authority to take decisions or challenge); skills and knowledge (e.g., little knowledge of costs), and environmental constraints (e.g., the nature of the healthcare system).DiscussionMedical students do not consider cost in their clinical decision making due to numerous factors, of which lack of knowledge of costs is but one. While some of the factors identified reflect those found in previous studies with residents and fully-trained staff, and in other contexts, theory driven analysis added value in that it facilitated a richer exploration of why students do not consider cost in clinical decision making. Our findings provide insight to inform how best to engage and empower educators and learners in teaching and learning about cost-conscious care.

Implementation of an educational intervention to improve medical student cost awareness: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundIn the context of rising healthcare costs, formal education on treatment-related financial hardship is lacking in many medical schools, leaving future physicians undereducated and unprepared to engage in high-value care.MethodWe performed a prospective cohort study to characterize medical student knowledge regarding treatment-related financial hardship from 2019 to 2020 and 2020–2021, with the latter cohort receiving a targeted educational intervention to increase cost awareness. Using Kirkpatrick’s four-level training evaluation model, survey data was analyzed to characterize the acceptability of the intervention and the impact of the intervention on student knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported preparedness to engage in cost-conscious care.ResultsOverall, N = 142 medical students completed the study survey; 61 (47.3%) in the non-intervention arm and 81 (66.4%) in the intervention arm. Of the 81 who completed the baseline survey in the intervention arm, 65 (80.2%) completed the immediate post-intervention survey and 39 (48.1%) completed the two-month post-intervention survey. Following the educational intervention, students reported a significantly increased understanding of common financial terms, access to cost-related resources, and level of comfort and preparedness in engaging in discussions around cost compared to their pre-intervention responses. The majority of participants (97.4%) reported that they would recommend the intervention to future students. A greater proportion of financially stressed students reported considering patient costs when making treatment decisions compared to their non-financially stressed peers.ConclusionsTargeted educational interventions to increase cost awareness have the potential to improve both medical student knowledge and preparedness to engage in cost-conscious care. Student financial stress may impact high-value care practices. Robust curricula on high-value care, including treatment-related financial hardship, should be formalized and universal within medical school training.

Patient advocacy in #EHJACVC: tackling acute cardiovascular care together.

‘The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease’—this famous and revolutionary quote by Sir William Osler1 has influenced and motivated generations of young healthcare providers to deliver thorough, integrated patient-centred care. Further than that, over the last decades, the focus of the medical field has shifted to recognizing the patient as an equal partner in the mutual interest and goal of improving health and wellbeing. Upon publication of their American College of Physicians (ACP) policy paper on measuring and achieving cost-conscious care,2 Dr Amir Qaseem, one of the authors and vice-president of ACP Clinical Policy stated ‘Physicians and patients need to work together to pursue care that improves health, avoids harms and eliminates wasteful practices’. Thankfully, patient involvement did not stop there, as patient organizations are now involved in discussions regarding health policy and delivery. Furthermore, patient representation in healthcare interest groups facilitates partnerships between medical systems and patients and their needs.3,4 The European Society of Cardiology’s (ESC) Patient Forum was found in 2018 and has flourished ever since (Figure 1).5,6 Since 2020, all guideline task forces have at least one patient representative involved, which ensures alignment between the Clinical Practice Guideline Committee and the Patient Forum. In addition, patient representatives have been involved in several ESC-lead committees and collaborations including patient-focused informational websites, surveys as well as educational and informational videos. Over the last years, patient representatives were actively participating in ESC congresses and important scientific publications.7–9

ASO Author Reflections: An Opportunity to Provide Cost-Conscious Care for Patients Undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

The substantial cost of care for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be augmented by changes in practice patterns. This report discusses the recent publication of the authors' group and their thoughts on cost-conscious cancer care.

Doctors as Resource Stewards? Translating High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care to the Consulting Room.

After many policy attempts to tackle the persistent rise in the costs of health care, physicians are increasingly seen as potentially effective resource stewards. Frameworks including the quadruple aim, value-based health care and choosing wisely underline the importance of positive engagement of the health care workforce in reinventing the system-paving the way to real affordability by defining the right care. Current programmes focus on educating future doctors to provide 'high-value, cost-conscious care' (HVCCC), which proponents believe is the future of sustainable medical practice. Such programmes, which aim to extend population-level allocation concerns to interactions between an individual doctor and patient, have generated lively debates about the ethics of expanding doctors' professional accountability. To empirically ground this discussion, we conducted a qualitative interview study to examine what happens when resource stewardship responsibilities are extended to the consulting room. Attempts to deliver HVCCC were found to involve inevitable trade-offs between benefits to the individual patient and (social) costs, medical uncertainty and efficiency, and between resource stewardship and trust. Physicians reconcile this by justifying good-value care in terms of what is in the best interest of individual patients-redefining the currency of value from monetary costs to a patient's quality of life, and cost-conscious care as reflective medical practice. Micro-level resource stewardship thus becomes a matter of working reflexively and reducing wasteful forms of care, rather than of making difficult choices about resource allocation.

Perspectives On Health Care Cost-Consciousness among Medical Students and Physicians

Introduction: Health care costs consciousness refers to care that aims to assess the benefits, harms and costs of interventions by the physicians. Rising health care costs have created an urgent need to improve physicians’ knowledge on health care costs for providing cost conscious care.&#x0D; Objectives: This study was done to assess and compare the knowledge and attitude towards health care cost consciousness of the undergraduate medical students and interns.&#x0D; Methodology: A Mixed Method study was done using a standardized questionnaire among 388 medical students and a Qualitative approach using In-depth interviews with 15 practicing physicians and a Focus group discussion to understand their perceptions on cost-conscious care and their opinions on introducing Cost-conscious curriculum for the medical students. Data analysed using a framework analytical approach and NVivo12.&#x0D; Results: 84% of the students agreed that all health personnel should be familiar with health care costs, 84.5% agreed that inclusion of the health care cost consciousness in medical curriculum is important for their carrier. The themes emerged identified the various perceptions, determinants on health care costs, cost-conscious decision making and their responsibility as a physician.&#x0D; Conclusion: The physicians and interns strongly suggested including a structured learning on Cost-Conscious Care as a part of medical education to educate and train the future physicians.

Residents' Reflections on Cost-Conscious Care after International Health Electives: A Single-Center Qualitative Study.

Estimates suggest 30% of health care expenditures are wasteful. This has led to increased educational interventions in graduate medical education (GME) training aimed to prepare residents for high value, cost-conscious practice. International health electives (IHE) are widely available in GME training and may be provide trainees a unique perspective on principles related to high value, cost-conscious care (HVCCC). The purpose of this study was to explore how trainee reflections on IHE experiences offer insight into HVCCC. The authors conducted an applied thematic analysis of narrative reflective reports of GME trainees' IHE experiences to characterize their perceptions of HVCCC. The Mayo International Health Program (MIHP) supports residents and fellows from all specialties across all Mayo Clinic sites. We included 546 MIHP participants from 2001 to 2020. The authors collected post-elective narrative reports from all MIHP participants. Reflections were coded and themes were organized into model for transformative learning during IHEs, focusing on HVCCC. GME trainees across 24 different medical specialties participated in IHEs in 73 different countries. Three components of transformative learning were identified: disorienting dilemma, critical reflection, and commitment to behavior change. Within the component of critical reflection, three topics related to HVCCC were identified: cost transparency, resource stewardship, and reduced fear of litigation. Transformation was demonstrated through reflection on future behavioral change, including cost-aware practice, stepwise approach to health care, and greater reliance on clinical skills. IHEs provide rich experiences for transformative learning and reflection on HVCCC. These experiences may help shape trainees' ideology of and commitment to HVCCC practices.

High Value Care Cost conscious: practicing habits and awareness among the doctors during clerkship

Aim: To evaluate the high value care cost conscious awareness among post administrative staff and doctors clinical. Study design: Cross sectional Survey. Place and duration of study: Shahida Islam Medical and Dental College and Hospital. From Jan 2021 to Dec 2021 Methodology: 50 doctors were recruited for conducting the proposed study and asked them to fill the questionnaire i.e., Maastricht HVCC Attitude Questionnaire (MHAQ) which was divided into three subscales such as high-value care, cost incorporation and perceived drawbacks. Moreover, job demands, and resources related questions were asked to resident respondents followed by the assessment of other stakeholders’ HVCCC attitudes. Data was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Following results have been noted during the research: HVCCC attitudes of faculty and administrators have been more positive than residents (p ≤ 0.05) whereas patients showed less positive behavior (p ≤ 0.05) than residents. Moreover, residents’ understanding for the HVCCC attitudes of faculty and patients was underestimated (p &lt; 0.001) and overestimated (p &lt; 0.001) respectively. It was observed that the increasing age was directly proportional to the positive attitudes towards HVCCC in both residents and faculty (p ≤ 0.05). While in patients’ lesser positive attitudes towards HVCCC was significantly associated (p &lt; 0.001) with lower perceived health quality. Direct relationship of the autonomy of residents perceived with their attitudes towards the HVCCC was also observed i.e., more independence means more positive attitudes. Conclusions: Attitudes towards HVCCC of the residents during course of residency vary due to their behavior and learning environment. Residents might misinterpret the faculty’s attitudes and patients attitudes as well. Faculty and administrators must be more supportive towards residents to enhance their capabilities through their experiences and knowledge of HVCCC and by giving them freedom in clinical practice. Keywords: HVCCC, residents, cost conscious care, clinical learning environment

Long-Term Impact of Global Pediatrics Curriculum, Experience, and Mentorship in Pediatric Residency.

ABSTRACT.Global health education is offered increasingly during residency training. The University of Minnesota has offered a global pediatrics track to residents since 2005. This study aimed to understand the impacts of a global pediatrics track on graduates’ career choices, skills, and current engagement in global health. An electronic survey was sent to 110 track graduates in February to April 2020. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and paired t-tests. Content analysis of written comments was conducted. The response rate was 62% overall, varying by question. Overall, 75% of responding graduates reported global pediatrics track participation affected their career choices. Eighty-four percent recalled plans to work in global health after graduation and 64% of respondents reported working in global health abroad or at home at the time of the survey. Incorporation of public health and global research represented the greatest percentage change in career plans from the time of enrollment to graduation (24% and 27%, respectively). Ninety-five percent of respondents reported that track participation improved their ability to elicit information about cultural beliefs and practices, and 86% reported improvement in cost-conscious care. An increase in global health knowledge and skills was the most common category of impact cited by respondents. Neonatal resuscitation, bubble continuous positive airway pressure, and homemade spacers for metered-dose inhalers were the most used global health-adapted skills. Our study found that graduates of the global pediatrics track perceive their participation affected their knowledge, skills, and attitudes positively, with the potential to improve clinical care and promote health equity locally and globally.

Does a Custom Electronic Health Record Alert System Improve Physician Compliance With National Quality Measures for Palliative Bone Metastasis Radiotherapy?

In an effort to promote cost-conscious, high-quality, and patient-centered care in the palliative radiation of painful bone metastases, the National Quality Forum (NQF) formed measure 1822 in 2012, which recommends the use of one of the four dose-fractionation schemes (30 Gy in 10 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, or 8 Gy in a single fraction). We investigated whether a custom electronic health record (EHR) alert system improved quality measure compliance among 88 physicians at a large academic center and institutional network. In March 2018, a multiphase alert system was embedded in a custom web-based EHR. Prior to a course of palliative bone radiation, the alert system notified the user of NQF 1822 recommendations and, once prescription was completed, either affirmed compliance or advised a change in treatment schedule. Rates of compliance were evaluated before and after implementation of alert system. Of 2,399 treatment courses, 86.5% were compliant with NQF 1822 recommendations. There was no difference in rates of NQF 1822 compliance before or after implementation of the custom EHR alert (86.0% before March 2018 v 86.9% during and after March 2018, P = .551). There was no change in rates of compliance following implementation of a custom EHR alert system designed to make treatment recommendations based on national quality measure guidelines. To be of most benefit, future palliative bone metastasis decision aids should leverage peer review, target a clear practice deficiency, center upon high-quality practice guidelines, and allow flexibility to reflect the diversity of clinical scenarios.

Teaching medical students to choose wisely through simulation.

The Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign aims to encourage dialog among physicians and patients about the costs and benefits of medical care. The purpose of the present study was to describe the implementation of the CW campaign among medical students in the pediatrics clerkship using different teaching strategies and to evaluate the students' perception and performance. A prospective, interventionist, open study with a control group was conducted. All sixth-year undergraduate medical students that were on their pediatric clerkship at the Emergency Department during the study period were invited to participate. The study consisted of two strategies: a remote video class about the CW initiative and in situ simulation training. By the end of the rotation, all participants were evaluated through an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). A total of 50 students were included, of which 24 watched only the online video (control group) and 26 were exposed to both the online video and the simulation scenarios (intervention group). Students in the intervention group had a significantly higher total score in the OSCE compared to students in the control group (median 90 vs 90; range 78-100 vs 50-100; p: 0.047). Median scores of behavioral items of the OSCE grouped together were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (median 60 vs 50; range 40-60 vs 20-60; p: 0.002).Conclusion: Simulation training about principles of the CW campaign had a greater impact on behavioral aspects of undergraduate students. This learning strategy was well accepted by participants. What is Known: • The Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign aims to encourage dialog among physicians and patients about the costs and benefits of medical care. • Teaching high-value and cost-conscious care to medical students is highly desired.. What is New: • Simulation training about principles of the CW campaign had a greater impact on behavioral aspects of undergraduate students.

ICRE Abstracts: Quality Improvement

ICRE Abstracts: Quality Improvement

National Quality Measure Compliance for Palliative Bone Radiation Among Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

There exists wide practice variability in palliative treatment schedules for bone metastases. In an effort to reduce variation and promote high-quality, cost-conscious care, the National Quality Forum (NQF) endorsed measure 1822 in 2012. This measure recommends the use of 30 Gy in 10 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, or 8 Gy in a single fraction for palliative radiation for bone metastases. We report on longitudinal compliance with this measure. Using the National Cancer Database, patients with metastatic thoracic non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 who received radiation therapy for bony sites of metastatic disease were identified. Treatment courses fitting 1 of the 4 recommended schedules under NQF 1822 were coded as compliant. Rates of compliance by patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. A total of 42,685 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Among all patients, 60.2% of treatment courses were compliant according to NQF 1822. Compliance increased over time and was highest for treatments to the extremity (69.8%), lowest for treatments to the skull or head (48.8%), and higher for academic practice (67.1%) compared with community (56.0%) or integrated network facilities (61.2%). On multivariable analysis, predictors of NQF 1822 compliance included year of diagnosis after 2011, treatment to an extremity, or treatment at an academic facility. Of noncompliant treatment courses, extended fractionation (≥11 fractions) occurred in 62.6% and was more common before 2012, in community practice, and for treatments of the skull or head. Among patients treated for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, compliance with NQF 1822 increased over time. Although extended fractionation constituted a majority of noncompliant treatment courses, a substantial proportion also involved shorter courses.

Toward High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care – Supporting Future Doctors to Adopt a Role as Stewards of a Sustainable Healthcare System

Phenomenon: In order to tackle the persistent rise of healthcare costs, physicians as “stewards of scarce resources” could be effective change agents, extending cost containment efforts from national policy to the micro level. Current programs focus on educating future doctors to deliver “high-value, cost-conscious care” (HVCCC). Although the importance of HVCCC education is increasingly recognized, there is a lag in implementation. Whereas recent efforts generated effective interventions that promote HVCCC in a local context, gaps persist in the examination of system factors that underlie broader successful and lasting implementation in educational and healthcare practices. Approach: We conducted a realist evaluation of a program focused on embedding HVCCC in postgraduate education by encouraging and supporting residents to set up “HVCCC projects” to promote HVCCC delivery. We interviewed 39 medical residents and 10 attending physicians involved in such HVCCC projects to examine HVCCC implementation in different educational and healthcare contexts. We held six reflection sessions attended by the program commissioners and educationalists to validate and enrich the findings. Findings: A realist evaluation was used to unravel the facilitators and barriers that underlie the implementation of HVCCC in a variety of healthcare practices. Whereas research activities regularly stop after the identification of facilitators and barriers, we used these insights to formulate four high-value, cost-conscious care carriers: (1) continue to promote HVCCC awareness, (2) create an institutional structure that fosters HVCCC, (3) continue the focus on projects for embedding HVCCC in practice, (4) generate evidence. The carriers support residents, attendings and others involved in educating physicians in training to develop and implement innovative HVCCC projects. Insights: Strategies to promote physician stewardship go beyond the formal curriculum and require a transformation in the informal educational system from one that almost exclusively focuses on medical discussions to one that also considers value and cost as part of medical decision-making. The HVCCC carriers propose a set of strategies and system adaptations that could aid the transformation toward a HVCCC supporting context.