Corticotropin-releasing Factor Antagonist Research Articles

Chemogenetic inhibition of corticotropin-releasing factor neurons in the central amygdala alters binge-like ethanol consumption in male mice.

Repetitive bouts of binge drinking can lead to neuroplastic events that alter ethanol's pharmacologic effects and perpetuate excessive consumption. The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system is an example of ethanol-induced neuroadaptations that drive excessive ethanol consumption. Our laboratory has previously shown that CRF antagonist, when infused into the central amygdala (CeA), reduces binge-like ethanol consumption. The present study extends this research by assessing the effects of silencing CRF-producing neurons in CeA on binge-like ethanol drinking stemming from "Drinking in the Dark" (DID) procedures. CRF-ires-Cre mice underwent surgery to infuse Gi/o-coupled Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADD) virus or a control virus into either the CeA or basolateral amygdala (BLA). Gi/o-DREADD-induced CRF-neuronal inhibition in the CeA resulted in a 33% decrease in binge-like ethanol consumption. However, no effect on ethanol consumption was seen after DREADD manipulation in the BLA. Moreover, CeA CRF-neuronal inhibition had no effect on sucrose consumption. The effects of silencing CRF neurons in the CeA on ethanol consumption are not secondary to changes in motor function or anxiety-like behaviors as assessed in the open-field test (OFT). Finally, the DREADD construct's functional ability to inhibit CRF-neuronal activity was demonstrated by reduced ethanol-induced c-Fos following DREADD activation. Together, these data suggest that the CRF neurons in the CeA play an important role in binge ethanol consumption and that inhibition of the CRF-signaling pathway remains a viable target for manipulating binge-like ethanol consumption. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Distal extracellular teneurin region (teneurin C-terminal associated peptide; TCAP) possesses independent intracellular calcium regulating actions, in vitro: A potential antagonist of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)

Teneurin C-terminal associated peptides (TCAP) are natural bioactive peptides that possess anxiety-reducing roles in animals, in vivo, and increase cell viability, in vitro. Although these peptides have some primary structural similarity to corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), they are derived from the distal extracellular region of the teneurin transmembrane protein where they may act as separate soluble peptides after auto-catalytic cleavage from the teneurin protein following interaction with the cognate teneurin receptor, latrophilin (ADGRL), or expressed as a separate mRNA. However, although the signal transduction mechanism of TCAP in neurons has not been established, previous studies indicate an association with the intracellular calcium flux. Therefore, in this study, we have characterized the TCAP-mediated calcium response in hypothalamic cell lines using single-cell calcium methods with pharmacological antagonists to identify potential calcium channels, in vitro. Under normal circumstances, TCAP-1 reduces cytosolic calcium concentrations by uptake into the mitochondria and efflux through the plasma membrane independently of the teneurins. In doing so, TCAP-1 could inhibit the potential ‘stress’ -inducing actions of CRF.

Regulatory Role of PFC Corticotropin-Releasing Factor System in Stress-Associated Depression Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Stress has a substantial role in formation of psychiatric disorders especially depression. Meanwhile, impairment of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is connected to the executive and cognitive deficits induced by the stress. Given the involvement of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in stress-related processes and knowing the fact that PFC hosts a lot of CRF receptors and CRF neurotransmissions, it can worth to look at the CRF as a potential treatment for the regulation of depression disorders induced by stress within PFC region. Here, for the first time we aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of intra-PFC CRF system in the modulation of depression dysfunction caused by the stress in clinical and preclinical models/studies. Qualified researches were combined utilizing a comprehensive search of six databases including Scopus, Pubmed, Web of Science, Sciencedirect, APA PsycNet, and Embase in April 2021 and were evaluated through proper methodological quality assessment tools. Results indicate that PFC has a remarkable role in the modulation for stress-induced depression and intra-PFC CRF receptors agonist and antagonist are very considerable for regulating these types of impairments. Specifically, elevation of both CRF immunoreactivity and gene expression were observed in human studies. In the animal studies, mostly immunoreactivity or excitatory/inhibitory currents of CRF within the PFC regulated depression dysfunction. In conclusion, reviewed studies show a positive attitude toward the CRF system in regulation of the stress-induced depression; however, obviously further investigations are required to get closer to the best treatment. Prefrontal cortex corticotropin-releasing factor system regulates stress-induced depression. CRFR1, Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor of type1; PFC, Prefrontal cortex; Minus (-) and Plus (+) signs, dysregulation and upregulation, respectively.

Corticotropin-releasing factor is involved in acute stress-induced analgesia and antipruritus.

Under the condition of stress, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) is activated and causes the secretion of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). Previous studies have demonstrated that CRF is involved in the regulation of pain and itch. Thus, it remains worthy to explore whether the desensitization of pain and itch under high-intensity acute stress (such as high fear and tension) is related to the sharp increase of CRF. Forced swimming was used to simulate acute stress. ELISA and pharmacological methods were conducted to observe the effects of forced swimming on acute pain or itch and the relationship between blood CRF content and itch or pain behavior. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of CRF was conducted to examine the effects of CRF on acute pain or itch. Intrathecal administration of CRF receptor agonist or antagonist was conducted to examine the receptor mechanisms of the regulatory role of CRF in pain and itch. ELISA experiment showed that the serum CRF in mice reached its peak within 5-10 min after acute stress (forced swimming). Behavioral data showed that the scratching behavior induced by itch agents decreased after acute swimming, while the mechanical pain threshold increased significantly. The inhibitory effect of acute stress on pain and itch is mediated by CRF receptor2 (CRFR2). Then, ICV injection of CRF was used to simulate the massive release of CRF under acute stress, and we observed that the scratching behavior induced by histamine or chloroquine was significantly inhibited after ICV injection of CRF. The above effects of CRF are mainly mediated by CRFR2. These results suggest that 5-10min after acute stress, a large amount of CRF is released into the blood from the hypothalamus, which significantly inhibits acute pain and itch by acting on CRFR2. ICV injection of CRF can replicate the antipruritus effects of acute stress. The present study investigated the mechanism of acute stress-induced analgesia and antipruritus and provided theoretical support for the treatment of pain and itch.

Off-label and investigational drugs in the treatment of alcohol use disorder: A critical review.

Compounds known to be successful in the treatment of alcohol use disorder include the aversive agent, Disulfiram, the glutamatergic NMDA receptor antagonist, Acamprosate, and the opioid receptor antagonists, Naltrexone and Nalmefene. Although all four are effective in maintaining abstinence or reduction of alcohol consumption, only a small percentage of patients receive pharmacological treatment. In addition, many other medications have been investigated for their therapeutic potential in the treatment of alcohol use disorder. In this review we summarize and compare Baclofen, Gabapentin, Topiramate, Ondansetron, Varenicline, Aripiprazole, Quetiapine, Clozapine, Antidepressants, Lithium, Neuropeptide Y, Neuropeptide S, Corticotropin-releasing factor antagonists, Oxytocin, PF-05190457, Memantine, Ifenprodil, Samidorphan, Ondelopran, ABT-436, SSR149415, Mifepristone, Ibudilast, Citicoline, Rimonabant, Surinabant, AM4113 and Gamma-hydroxybutyrate While some have shown promising results in the treatment of alcohol use disorder, others have disappointed and should be excluded from further investigation. Here we discuss the most promising results and highlight medications that deserve further preclinical or clinical study. Effective, patient-tailored treatment will require greater understanding provided by many more preclinical and clinical studies.

The Influence of Stress on Decision-Making: Effects of CRF and Dopamine Antagonism in the Nucleus Accumbens.

The actions of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the core of the nucleus accumbens including increasing dopamine release and inducing conditioned place preference in stress-naïve animals. However, following two-day, repeated forced swim stress (rFSS), neither of these effects are present, indicating a stress-sensitive interaction between CRF and dopamine. To ascertain the degree to which this mechanism influences integrated, reward-based decision making, we used an operant concurrent-choice task where mice could choose between two liquid receptacles containing a sucrose solution or water delivery. Following initial training, either a CRF or dopamine antagonist, α-helical CRF (9–41) and flupenthixol, respectively, or vehicle was administered intracranially to the nucleus accumbens core. Next, the animals underwent rFSS, were reintroduced to the task, and were retested. Prior to stress, mice exhibited a significant preference for sucrose over water and made more total nose pokes into the sucrose receptacle than the water receptacle throughout the session. There were no observed sex differences. Stress did not robustly affect preference metrics but did increase the number of trial omissions compared to their stress-naïve, time-matched counterparts. Interestingly, flupenthixol administration did not affect sucrose choice but increased their nosepoke preference during the inter-trial interval, increased trial omissions, and decreased the total nosepokes during the ITI. In contrast, microinjections of α-helical CRF (9–41) did not affect omissions or ITI nosepokes but produced interactions with stress on choice metrics. These data indicate that dopamine and CRF both interact with stress to impact performance in the task but influence different behavioral aspects.

Distal Extracellular Teneurin Region (Teneurin C-Terminal Associated Peptide; TCAP) Possesses Independent Intracellular Calcium Regulating Actions, in Vitro: A Novel Antagonist of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF)

Distal Extracellular Teneurin Region (Teneurin C-Terminal Associated Peptide; TCAP) Possesses Independent Intracellular Calcium Regulating Actions, in Vitro: A Novel Antagonist of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF)

Design, synthesis, structural optimization, SAR, in silico prediction of physicochemical properties and pharmacological evaluation of novel & potent thiazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidine corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonists

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is a 41-amino-acid neuropeptide secreted from the hypothalamus and is the main regulator of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis. CRF is the master hormone which modulates physiological and behavioral responses to stress. Many disorders including anxiety, depression, addictive disorders and others are related to over activation of the CRF system. This suggests that new molecules which can interfere with CRF binding to its receptors may be potential candidates for neuropsychiatric drugs to treat stress-related disorders. Previously, three series of pyrimidine and fused pyrimidine CRF1 receptor antagonists were synthesized by our group and specific binding assays, competitive binding studies and determination of the ability to antagonize the agonist-stimulated accumulation of cAMP (the second messenger for CRF receptors) were reported. In continuation of our efforts in this direction, in the current manuscript, we report the synthesis & biological evaluation of a new series of CRF1 receptor antagonists. Seven compounds showed promising binding affinity with the best two compounds (compounds 6 & 43) displaying a superior binding affinity to all of our previous compounds. Compounds 6 & 43 have only 4 times and 2 times less binding affinity than the standard CRF antagonist antalarmin, respectively. Thus, our two best lead compounds (compound 6 & 43) can be considered potent CRF receptor antagonists with binding affinity of 41.0 & 19.2 nM versus 9.7 nM for antalarmin.

Activation of CRF1 receptors expressed in brainstem autonomic nuclei stimulates colonic enteric neurons and secreto-motor function in male rats.

Hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor 1 (CRF1 ) plays a role in acute stress-related stimulation of colonic motor function. Less is known on CRF1 signaling in the brainstem. We investigate CRF1 expression in the brainstem and the colonic response to 4th ventricle (4V) injection of CRF and urocortin (Ucn) 2 (3 µg/rat) in chronically cannulated male rats. Transcripts of CRF1 wild-type 1a and splice variants 1c, 1e, 1f, 1o along with three novel variants 1a-2 (desK-110 in exon 5), 1p (-exon 7), and 1q (exon 5 extension) were identified in the pons and medulla. The area postrema, nucleus tractus solitarius, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, locus coeruleus, and Barrington's nucleus isolated by laser capture microdissection expressed 1a, 1a-2, and 1p but not 1q. Compared to 4V vehicle, 4V CRF induced fecal pellet output (FPO) and diarrhea that were blocked by the CRF antagonist, astressin-B. CRF2 agonist, Ucn2 had no effect on basal or CRF-induced FPO. CRF actions were correlated with the induction of c-Fos immunoreactivity in myenteric neurons of the proximal and distal colon (pC, dC) and submucosal neurons of dC. c-Fos immunoreactivity occurred in 39% and 37% of myenteric cholinergic and 7% and 58% of nitrergic neurons in the pC and dC, respectively. CRF1a and its splice variants are expressed in brainstem nuclei, and activation of CRF1 signaling at the level of the brainstem stimulates colonic secretory-motor function through activation of colonic enteric neurons.

Prefrontal corticotropin-releasing factor neurons impair sustained attention via distal transmitter release.

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) supports cognitive processes critical for goal-directed behavior. Although the PFC contains a high density of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) neurons, their role in cognition has been largely unexplored. We recently demonstrated that CRF neurons in the caudal dorsomedial PFC (dmPFC) of rats act to impair working memory via activation of local CRF receptors. However, there is heterogeneity in the neural mechanisms that support the diversity of PFC-dependent cognitive processes. Currently, the degree to which PFC CRF neurons impact other forms of PFC-dependent cognition is unknown. To address this issue, the current studies examined the effects of chemogenetic manipulations of PFC CRF neurons on sustained attention in male rats. Similar to working memory, activation of caudal dmPFC CRF neurons impaired, while inhibition of these neurons or global CRF receptor antagonism improved, sustained attention. However, unlike working memory, the sustained attention-impairing effect of PFC CRF neurons was not dependent on local CRF receptors. Moreover, CRF infusion into the caudal dmPFC or other medial PFC subregions had no effect on task performance. Together, these observations demonstrate that while caudal dmPFC CRF neurons impair both working memory and sustained attention, these actions involve distinct neural circuits (local CRF release for working memory and extra-PFC release for sustained attention). Nonetheless, the procognitive actions of systemically administered CRF antagonists across both tasks are similar to those seen with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-related treatments. Thus, CRF antagonists may have potential for use in the treatment of PFC cognitive dysfunction.

154 Evaluating the effects of prophylactic antibiotics on intestinal health in pigs given a corticotropin-releasing factor antagonist during weaning and transport

Abstract Prophylactic antibiotics improve intestinal health in pigs; however, it is unknown whether their efficacy interacts with a pig’s stress response following weaning and transport. The study objective was to determine whether a corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) antagonist would impact the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on improving intestinal health in transported weaned pigs. Mixed-sex pigs (n = 56; 5.70 ± 1.05 kg BW) were weaned (20.49 ± 0.64 d), a blood sample was taken, pigs were given an i.p. injection of saline (SAL) or a CRF antagonist (CRFA; 30 µg/kg BW; Astressin B), and then were transported for 12 h. Pigs were given a second and third i.p. injection at 6 and 12 h of transport, respectively. Following transport, 4 SAL and 4 CRFA pigs were blood sampled and euthanized. The remaining 48 pigs were individually housed and assigned to an antibiotic [A; chlortetracycline (441 ppm) + tiamulin (38.6 ppm)] or no antibiotic (NA) diet treatment balanced by injection treatment (n = 12 pigs/treatment combination). Blood was collected at 12 h and on d 3, 7, and 14 and pigs were euthanized on d 7 (n = 24) and d 14 (n = 24) post-weaning and transport. Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone was reduced overall (P = 0.05; 9.1%) in CRFA versus SAL pigs. On d 7, jejunal villus height was greater (P = 0.04; 33%) in A versus NA pigs. Jejunal zonula occludens-1 (58.8%) and ileal claudin-1 (100.5%) mRNA abundance tended to be increased (P = 0.09) in CRFA+NA versus SAL+NA pigs on d 7. On d 14, jejunal tumor necrosis factor-alpha mRNA abundance was reduced (P = 0.02; 29.9%) in A versus NA pigs and jejunal glucagon-like peptide-2 mRNA abundance was increased (P = 0.03) in CRFA+NA versus SAL+NA (48.4%) and SAL+A versus SAL+NA (55.8%) pigs. No intestinal health parameter differences were detected (P > 0.05) between CRFA+NA and SAL+A pigs. In conclusion, CRFA and A impacted weaned pig intestinal health measures at similar levels.

Discovery of a stable tripeptide targeting the N-domain of CRF1 receptor.

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its CRF1 receptor (CRF1R) play a central role in the maintenance of homeostasis. Malfunctioning of the CRF/CRF1R unit is associated with several disorders, such as anxiety and depression. Non-peptide CRF1R-selective antagonists have been shown to exert anxiolytic and antidepressant effects on experimental animals. However, none of them is in clinical use today because of several side effects, thus demonstrating the need for the development of other more suitable CRF1R antagonists. In an effort to develop novel CRF1R antagonists we designed, synthesized and chemically characterized two tripeptide analogues of CRF, namely (R)-LMI and (S)-LMI, having their Leu either in R (or D) or in S (or L) configuration, respectively. Their design was based on the crystal structure of the N-extracellular domain (N-domain) of CRF1R/CRF complex, using a relevant array of computational methods. Experimental evaluation of the stability of synthetic peptides in human plasma has revealed that (R)-LMI is proteolytically more stable than (S)-LMI. Based on this finding, (R)-LMI was selected for pharmacological characterization. We have found that (R)-LMI is a CRF antagonist, inhibiting (1) the CRF-stimulated accumulation of cAMP in HEK 293 cells expressing the CRF1R, (2) the production of interleukins by adipocytes and (3) the proliferation rate of RAW 264.7 cells. (R)-LMI likely blocked agonist actions by interacting with the N-domain of CRF1R as suggested by data using a constitutively active chimera of CRF1R. We propose that (R)-LMI can be used as an optimal lead compound in the rational design of novel CRF antagonists.

Electroacupuncture ameliorates corticotrophin-releasing factor-induced jejunal dysmotility in a rat model of stress.

Central injection of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) mimics the effect of stress on gastrointestinal (GI) responses, including inhibition of GI motility. This study was designed to explore the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on disordered jejunal motility in a rat model of stress induced by intracisternal (IC) injection of CRF. A stress model was established by IC injection of CRF in Sprague-Dawley rats. GI motility was evaluated by assessing gastric emptying (GE), gastrointestinal transit (GIT) and jejunal motility in vivo. EA was performed at ST36. The functional roles of CRF receptor subtype 1 and subtype 2 (CRFr1 and CRFr2) were examined by IC administration of the corresponding selective CRF antagonists. Protein expression of CRFr1 and CRFr2 in the hypothalamus and jejunum was detected by Western blotting. IC injection of CRF significantly inhibited GE, GIT and jejunal motility. EA treatment remarkably improved the disturbed GI motility. Intriguingly, the disordered jejunal motility induced by central CRF was abolished by IC injection of a selective CRFr2 antagonist, indicating the essential role of central CRFr2 in mediating the stress-induced jejunal motor disorder. EA at ST36 decreased central and peripheral expression of CRFr2, which might be one of the potential mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of EA on jejunal dysmotility in this rat model of stress. This study suggested that EA at ST36 could ameliorate disordered jejunal motility induced by stress, and that this might be associated with the down-regulation of CRFr2.

Hormonal Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: State of the Art.

Major depressive disorder is a common psychiatric disorder associated with marked suffering, morbidity, mortality, and cost. The World Health Organization projects that by 2030, major depression will be the leading cause of disease burden worldwide. While numerous treatments for major depression exist, many patients do not respond adequately to traditional antidepressants. Thus, more effective treatments for major depression are needed, and targeting certain hormonal systems is a conceptually based approach that has shown promise in the treatment of this disorder. A number of hormones and hormone-manipulating compounds have been evaluated as monotherapies or adjunctive treatments for major depression, with therapeutic actions attributable not only to the modulation of endocrine systems in the periphery but also to the CNS effects of hormones on non-endocrine brain circuitry. The authors describe the physiology of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA), hypothalamic-pituitary thyroid (HPT), and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axes and review the evidence for selected hormone-based interventions for the treatment of depression in order to provide an update on the state of this field for clinicians and researchers. The review focuses on the HPA axis-based interventions of corticotropin-releasing factor antagonists and the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone, the HPT axis-based treatments of thyroid hormones (T3 and T4), and the HPG axis-based treatments of estrogen replacement therapy, the progesterone derivative allopregnanolone, and testosterone. While some treatments have largely failed to translate from preclinical studies, others have shown promising initial results and represent active fields of study in the search for novel effective treatments for major depression.

Pharmacological Treatment of Methamphetamine/Amphetamine Dependence: A Systematic Review.

BackgroundStimulant drugs are second only to cannabis as the most widely used class of illicit drug globally, accounting for 68 million past-year consumers. Dependence on amphetamines (AMPH) or methamphetamine (MA) is a growing global concern. Yet, there is no established pharmacotherapy for AMPH/MA dependence. A comprehensive assessment of the research literature on pharmacotherapy for AMPH/MA dependence may inform treatment guidelines and future research directions.MethodsWe systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature via the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and SCOPUS for randomised controlled trials reported in the English language examining a pharmacological treatment for AMPH/MA dependence or use disorder. We included all studies published to 19 June 2019. The selected studies were evaluated for design; methodology; inclusion and exclusion criteria; sample size; pharmacological and (if included) psychosocial interventions; length of follow-up and follow-up schedules; outcome variables and measures; results; overall conclusions and risk of bias. Outcome measures were any reported impact of treatment related to AMPH/MA use.ResultsOur search returned 43 studies that met our criteria, collectively enrolling 4065 participants and reporting on 23 individual pharmacotherapies, alone or in combination. Disparate outcomes and measures (n = 55 for the primary outcomes) across studies did not allow for meta-analyses. Some studies demonstrated mixed or weak positive signals (often in defined populations, e.g. men who have sex with men), with some variation in efficacy signals dependent on baseline frequency of AMPH/MA use. The most consistent positive findings have been demonstrated with stimulant agonist treatment (dexamphetamine and methylphenidate), naltrexone and topiramate. Less consistent benefits have been shown with the antidepressants bupropion and mirtazapine, the glutamatergic agent riluzole and the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF-1) antagonist pexacerfont; whilst in general, antidepressant medications (e.g. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs]) have not been effective in reducing AMPH/MA use.ConclusionsNo pharmacotherapy yielded convincing results for the treatment of AMPH/MA dependence; mostly studies were underpowered and had low treatment completion rates. However, there were positive signals from several agents that warrant further investigation in larger scale studies; agonist therapies show promise. Common outcome measures should include change in use days. Future research must address the heterogeneity of AMPH/MA dependence (e.g. coexisting conditions, severity of disorder, differences between MA and AMPH dependence) and the role of psychosocial intervention.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40263-020-00711-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Molecular Basis for Hormone Recognition and Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptors.

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and the three related peptides urocortins 1-3 (UCN1-UCN3) are endocrine hormones that control the stress responses by activating CRF1R and CRF2R, two members of class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, we present two cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of UCN1-bound CRF1R and CRF2R with the stimulatory G protein. In both structures, UCN1 adopts a single straight helix with its N terminus dipped into the receptor transmembrane bundle. Although the peptide-binding residues in CRF1R and CRF2R are different from other members of class B GPCRs, the residues involved in receptor activation and G protein coupling are conserved. In addition, both structures reveal bound cholesterol molecules to the receptor transmembrane helices. Our structures define the basis of ligand-binding specificity in the CRF receptor-hormone system, establish a common mechanism of class B GPCR activation and G protein coupling, and provide a paradigm for studying membrane protein-lipid interactions for class B GPCRs.

The role of peripheral corticotropin-releasing factor signaling in a rat model of stress-induced gastric hyperalgesia

BackgroundFunctional dyspepsia (FD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder associated with persistent or recurrent upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms such as pain without any obvious pathological changes. Psychological and psychiatric factors might have a pathogenic role in FD. Changes in the sensation of stomach pain were determined after application of stress to adult rats. The involvement of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), Type 2 CRF receptor (CRF2) and inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) was also investigated in the gastric hyperalgesia observed in this model. ResultsRepeated water avoidance stress (WA-S) produced gastric hyperalgesia, with no obvious lesions in the gastric mucosa. Gastric hyperalgesia was inhibited by CRF and CRF2 antagonists, suggesting their involvement in gastric hyperalgesia observed after application of stress. Gastric hyperalgesia was inhibited by IL-6 neutralizing antibody. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated CRF, CRF2, urocortin (Ucn)1, and Ucn2-positive cells in the gastric mucosa. CRF2-positive cells increased after WA-S, compared to sham stress. CRF2 and Ucn2 were expressed in the mast cells in the gastric mucosa. ConclusionsCRF2 plays an important role in gastric hyperalgesia produced by stress. CRF2 signaling may be a useful therapeutic target for functional dyspepsia.

The importance of target binding kinetics for measuring target binding affinity in drug discovery: a case study from a CRF1 receptor antagonist program

In drug discovery, it is essential to accurately measure drug-target binding affinity. Here, we revisit the fact that target binding kinetics impact the measurement of affinity, using a case study: development of corticotropin-releasing factor antagonists. Slow dissociation of the drug-target complex results in affinity assays being far from equilibrium, which results in erroneous estimates of affinity. This scenario can impair prediction of human dosing, assessment of target selectivity, identification of high-affinity ligands and determination of SAR. We describe strategies to detect lack of equilibration in affinity assays and methods to correctly measure affinity of slowly dissociating compounds. These considerations will facilitate drug discovery by ensuring reliable measurement of drug-target binding affinity.

Pretreatment with a CRF antagonist amplifies feeding inhibition induced by fourth ventricular cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide

BackgroundPre-treatment with the corticotropin-releasing factor antagonist α-helical CRF9-41 prevents inhibition of gastric emptying by cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide at a dorsal hindbrain level, but its inhibition of sucrose intake is not affected. This is suggestive of separable underlying mechanisms of action in the caudal brainstem for cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide with regard to food intake and gastrointestinal functions. Here we further examine cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide—corticotropin-releasing factor receptor interactions in caudal brainstem controls of solid food intake. Injections of combinations of vehicle, cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide (0.5 μg or 1 μg) or α-helical CRF9-41 were given into the fourth cerebral ventricle of rats. Nocturnal solid food intake was recorded over 22 h.ResultsPre-treatment with α-helical CRF9-41 into the fourth ventricle significantly increased the responsivity to cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide on hypophagia. In a separate control experiment, α-helical CRF9-41 pre-treatment blocked CRF-induced food intake inhibition indicative of its antagonistic effectiveness.ConclusionsWe conclude that an endogenous Corticotropin-releasing factor agonist may modulate suppression of food intake caused by cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide at a dorsal hindbrain level in the absence of stress. A potential caudal brainstem mechanism whereby cocaine-and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide effects on food intake is attenuated via corticotropin-releasing factor receptor activity causing tonic inhibition, is suggested.

Concomitant Behavioral, Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Study in Real Time on the Role of CRF and CRF Antagonist(S) in Anxiety and Depression: Possible Association CRF + 5-HT Receptor Antagonists?

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) is involved in conditions of anxiety and stress: It stimulates the release of adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH). Also, catecholamines increase ACTH release, while serotonin (5-HT) increases both ACTH and CRF.