Introduction: Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) often undergo CT and CT angiography with the latter being done to identify vascular abnormalities for ICH etiology. It is unclear whether CTA yields are high enough to warrant routine use particularly for subcortical ICH, however. Methods: Retrospective chart review was done on the Loyola Stroke Database of ICH patients over the last 10 years. Data from CT, CTA (and other imaging modalities) regarding ICH size and location, as well as vascular abnormalities, were collected. Demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes were also recorded. Frequencies and percentages are reported to describe overall sample and bivariate associations. Univariate logistic regression estimated unadjusted effects of ICH type, age, hypertension (HTN), and other predictors on the logit of vascular abnormalities. Chi square values are reported for overall interaction effects. Stratified odds ratios (OR) are reported with 95% confidence intervals and p-values. Multivariable binary logistic regression estimated adjusted effects of ICH type on the logit of vascular abnormalities, after adjusting for covariates; OR are reported for adjusted effects. Results: Of 744 ICH cases analyzed, 376 were subcortical (50.54%) and 368 cortical (49.46%). Eighty-one had vascular abnormalities (10.89%); 46 of those being lesion-related (6.18%). Unadjusted odds of lesion-related vascular abnormalities were higher for cortical versus subcortical ICH (OR: 7.04; 95% CI: 3.09, 16.04; p < 0.01). Two-way interaction was non-significant for effects of ICH type and age (p = 0.76), ICH type and HTN (p = 0.68), age and hypertension (p = 0.09), and ICH type and ICH size (p = 0.93) on the logit of lesion-related vascular abnormalities. Thus, these effects did not co-vary significantly with respect to lesion-related vascular abnormalities. Odds of lesion-related vascular abnormalities are significantly higher for cortical versus subcortical ICH, after adjusting for age, HTN ICH size, and CTA (OR: 6.91; 95% CI: 2.93, 16.30; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Our analysis suggests there is decreased utility for CTA in subcortical compared to cortical ICH and CTA should probably not be performed routinely on subcortical ICH.