The Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) was enacted in the United States more than 25 years ago, and the water industry is now anticipating a proposal from the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to update those regulations in early 2019. The anticipated LCR revisions, along with recent and highly publicized drinking water lead events, have resulted in renewed interest in drinking water lead levels. In response, this special focus issue of Journal AWWA is dedicated to presenting current information on lead and copper in drinking water. Much has been learned about lead and copper corrosion control over the past two decades or so, thanks to research by academic and governmental investigators (especially at USEPA itself) and the practical experiences of water professionals at countless drinking water utilities. For example, little was known about the importance of particulate lead relative to soluble lead 25 years ago. Drinking water sampling strategies focused on first draw according to the LCR, yet now we understand the value of alternative sampling approaches to address different lead and copper objectives. Parameters such as the Langelier saturation index and calcium carbonate precipitation potential were previously considered viable lead corrosion control assessment options in the original guidance, yet their value is now questioned as they may actually prove misleading for lead control. The role that orthophosphates play in lead corrosion control compared with polyphosphates is better appreciated even if it is still not well understood. The role of pipe age in copper mineralogy and solubility has been explored, as has the connection between pipe scale analysis findings and metal release to drinking water, and corrosion mechanisms and making corrosion treatment changes are better understood. Despite recent progress, there is still much to learn. Research on lead and copper in water systems and their effects on human health is ongoing. As demonstrated by the original research published in this special issue of Journal AWWA, the drinking water industry seeks to further reduce lead and copper in drinking water. Special thanks goes to all of the authors who contributed to this issue of the Journal. Feature articles begin with a review by Cornwell (page 30) on how well the water industry has reduced lead levels since the LCR with a focus on current national levels. McTigue et al. (page 38) review AWWA's new standard on lead service line replacement. And Burlingame et al. (page 44) focus on utility efforts to help reduce lead in schools. There are several peer-reviewed research articles in this issue, as well, including the article by Roth et al. (page 15) on how blending source waters affects lead corrosion—an often-forgotten issue. The article by Deshommes et al. (page 28) discusses lead service line management and public perception. Lytle et al. (page 26) describe a model they developed based on laboratory and field data for estimating the impact of orthophosphate dose on copper reduction. Williams et al. (page 27) present details on what they have learned in designing a pipe rig system to evaluate corrosion control on harvested lead pipes. Finally, Bradley and Horscroft (page 29) describe their approach to using historical LCR and water quality data to evaluate corrosion control effectiveness.
Read full abstract