Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Research Articles

TCT-658 Impact of Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve on 5-Year Clinical Outcomes (The FFR SEARCH Study)

TCT-658 Impact of Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve on 5-Year Clinical Outcomes (The FFR SEARCH Study)

Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We aimed to investigate the relationship between post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) and clinical outcome using a systematic review with a study-level meta-analysis. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were systematically searched for articles with clinical follow-up reporting mean or median final post-PCI FFR. The main outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Meta-regression analyses were performed on mean post-PCI FFR values. A total of 62 studies with 12340 patients and 12923 stented vessels were included, with follow-ups ranging from 1 to 89 months. Post-PCI FFR was not continuously associated with the rate of 1-year MACE or 1-year TVR using meta-regression models accounting for heterogeneous follow-up lengths. For studies comparing high vs. low post-PCI FFR, low post-PCI FFR was associated with high risk ratio for MACE {1.97 [95% confidence interval (CI):1.45-2.67]}, all-cause death [1.59 (95% CI: 1.08-2.34)], MI [3.18 (95% CI: 1.84-5.50)], TVR [2.08 (95% CI: 1.63-2.65)] and angina status [2.50 (95% CI: 1.53-4.06)] using different optimal cut-off values spanning from 0.80 to 0.95. We found no clear continuous association between post-PCI FFR and clinical outcomes in this systematic study-level meta-analysis. In a subset of studies investigating binary classification, high post-PCI FFR was associated with a better clinical outcome than low post-PCI FFR.We investigated the relationship between post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) and rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR), using a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis, pooling 12340 patients from 62 studies. Mean post-PCI FFR was not continuously associated with a 1-year MACE rate accounting for heterogenous follow-up lengths. Still, the risk ratio favoured high post-PCI FFR for reduced MACE, all-cause death, MI, TVR, and better angina status using different cut-offs.

Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.

Objectives Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) computes fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Residual QFR estimates post‐percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) FFR. This study sought to assess the relationship of residual QFR with post-PCI FFR. Methods Residual QFR analysis, using pre-PCI ICA, was attempted in 159 vessels with post-PCI FFR. QFR lesion location was matched with the PCI location to simulate the performed intervention and allow computation of residual QFR. A post-PCI FFR < 0.90 was used to define a suboptimal PCI result. Results Residual QFR computation was successful in 128 (81%) vessels. Median residual QFR was higher than post-PCI FFR (0.96 Q1–Q3: 0.91–0.99 vs. 0.91 Q1–Q3: 0.86–0.96, p < 0.001). A significant correlation and agreement were observed between residual QFR and post-PCI FFR (R = 0.56 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.47, p < 0.001 for both). Following PCI, an FFR < 0.90 was observed in 54 (42%) vessels. Specificity, positive predictive value, sensitivity, and negative predictive value of residual QFR for assessment of the PCI result were 96% (95% confidence interval (CI): 87–99%), 89% (95% CI: 72–96%), 44% (95% CI: 31–59%), and 70% (95% CI: 65–75%), respectively. Residual QFR had an accuracy of 74% (95% CI: 66–82%) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71–0.86). Conclusions A significant correlation and agreement between residual QFR and post-PCI FFR were observed. Residual QFR ≥ 0.90 did not necessarily commensurate with a satisfactory PCI (post-PCI FFR ≥ 0.90). In contrast, residual QFR exhibited a high specificity for prediction of a suboptimal PCI result.

Highlights From the Circulation Family of Journals

Highlights From the <i>Circulation</i> Family of Journals

Postocclusional Hyperemia for Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Postocclusional hyperemia caused by balloon occlusion is a potential alternative method of inducing hyperemia for measuring post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve (FFR). The aim of this study was to investigate postocclusional hyperemia as a method of inducing hyperemia. FFR measured by postocclusional hyperemia (FFRoccl) caused by balloon occlusion after percutaneous coronary intervention was compared with FFR measured by drug-induced hyperemia (FFR measured by intravenous ATP; and FFR measured by intracoronary papaverine injection [FFRpap]) in 98 lesions from 98 patients. The hyperemia duration was also measured for FFRoccl and FFRpap. The correlation coefficient between FFRoccl, FFR measured by intravenous ATP (r=0.973; P<0.01), and FFRpap (r=0.975; P<0.01) showed almost identical values to those obtained for the correlation coefficient between FFR measured by intravenous ATP and FFRpap (r=0.967; P<0.01). No clear difference was observed on Bland-Altman analysis. Hyperemia duration was significantly longer with FFRoccl than with FFRpap (70±22 versus 51±25 s; P<0.01). Strong correlations were found between FFRoccl and FFR measured by intravenous ATP and FFRoccl and FFRpap. Hyperemia caused by FFRoccl was significantly longer than that caused by FFRpap.

TCT-134 Impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve measurement on procedural management and clinical outcomes: the REPEAT-FFR Study

TCT-134 Impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve measurement on procedural management and clinical outcomes: the REPEAT-FFR Study