Coronal Plane Alignment Research Articles

A Restriction Boundary-Based Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) Classification for Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Restriction Boundary-Based Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) Classification for Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty

Fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores pre-arthritic coronal alignment and achieves satisfactory functional outcomes: a retrospective study

PurposeThis study aimed to (1) analyze the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), (2) assess whether UKA can restore pre-arthritic coronal alignment by utilizing the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), and (3) evaluate the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and postoperative alignment following UKA.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 152 consecutive patients who underwent fixed-bearing medial UKA. A radiological analysis was conducted using an EOS imaging system. Postoperative alignment was classified as neutral (varus ≤ 3°), mild varus (3° < varus ≤ 7°), or marked varus (varus > 7°) based on the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA). The aHKA was calculated and the CPAK classification was used to categorize knee phenotypes. The PROMs were obtained both before and after the surgery.ResultsA total of 152 knees from 113 patients were included with a mean two-year follow-up. The mean difference between the postoperative mHKA and the estimated aHKA was 0.80° (90% CI 0.35 to 1.24; P = 0.003). Postoperatively, 63 (41.45%) of the 152 knees were in neutral group, 54 (35.53%) mild varus, and 35 (23.03%) marked varus. The neutrally aligned cohort did not exhibit significantly higher scores in range of motion, VAS, HSS, WOMAC, or FJS-12 scores compared to the mild or marked varus cohort (P = 0.205, 0.118, 0.076, 0.140, and 0.788, respectively) during the short-term follow-up.ConclusionNon-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing medial UKA can restore pre-arthritic coronal alignment and achieve satisfactory PROMs. Fixed-bearing medial UKA aims to restore the pre-arthritic alignment rather than achieving neutral mechanical alignment.

Impact of Aging and Knee Osteoarthritis on Lower Limb Alignment and CPAK Classification: Gender Differences in a Japanese Cohort.

Objective: This study investigates the impact of age and knee osteoarthritis (OA) on the coronal plane alignment of the lower extremity in Japanese males and females, utilizing the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification system. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 150 male and 150 female patients. Participants were divided into three groups according to age and OA progression. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured using standard digital long-leg radiographs. Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) were calculated, and the CPAK classification was performed to verify the distribution among the three groups. Results: The results showed increased varus alignment of the mean mLDFA correlated with OA in both genders and with aging in males. The mean mMPTA did not change in males but shifted toward varus in females with both aging and OA. Both genders demonstrated a constitutional varus alignment with the progression of osteoarthritis (males: 1.3 ± 2.4° to -3.5 ± 3.7°, p < 0.001; females: -1.2 ± 3.2° to -3.6 ± 2.9°, p < 0.001). However, this trend with aging was observed only in females (0.0 ± 2.5° to -1.2 ± 3.2°, p = 0.018). JLO maintained its apex distal position with aging and OA progression in all subjects. The study further revealed a notable transition from CPAK Type II to Type I with OA progression in both genders, additionally influenced by aging in females. Conclusions: Aging affects coronal alignment and CPAK classification differently across genders. With OA progression, there was a shift toward smaller aHKA, while JLO remained unchanged. Compared to other races, young Japanese people exhibit similar CPAK distributions, but distinct differences appear in OA-affected individuals, highlighting potential racial variations in CPAK classifications.

Windswept deformity of the knee: prevalence and predictive factors in osteoarthritic and healthy populations.

This study examined windswept deformity (WSD) of the knee, comparing prevalence and contributing factors in healthy and osteoarthritic (OA) cohorts. A case-control radiological study was undertaken comparing 500 healthy knees (250 adults) with a consecutive sample of 710 OA knees (355 adults) undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were determined for each knee, and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity, and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types were calculated. WSD was defined as a varus mHKA of < -2° in one limb and a valgus mHKA of > 2° in the contralateral limb. The primary outcome was the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between healthy and OA groups. Secondary outcomes were the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between constitutional varus and valgus CPAK types, and to explore associations between predefined variables and WSD within the OA group. WSD was more prevalent in the OA group compared to the healthy group (7.9% vs 0.4%; p < 0.001, relative risk (RR) 19.8). There was a significant difference in means and variance between the mHKA of the healthy and OA groups (mean -1.3° (SD 2.3°) vs mean -3.8°(SD 6.6°) respectively; p < 0.001). No significant differences existed in MPTA and LDFA between the groups, with a minimal difference in aHKA (mean -0.9° healthy vs -0.5° OA; p < 0.001). Backwards logistic regression identified meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy as predictors of WSD (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 10.0), p = 0.002; OR 11.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 89.3); p = 0.016; OR 41.6 (95% CI 5.4 to 432.9), p ≤ 0.001, respectively). This study found a 20-fold greater prevalence of WSD in OA populations. The development of WSD is associated with meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy. These findings support WSD being mostly an acquired condition following skeletal maturity.

DOES CHANGE IN CORONAL PLANE ALIGNMENT OF THE KNEE CLASSIFICATION FOLLOWING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY INFLUENCE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AND SURVIVORSHIP? A REVIEW OF 1,062 CASES WITH TEN YEARS’ FOLLOW-UP

Restoration of native Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotype is a strategy suggested to achieve better satisfaction. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of changes in CPAK classification on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and survivorship in a large cohort of manual mechanically aligned (MA) cemented TKAs.A retrospective analysis of 1062 consecutive cemented TKAs using MA philosophy at a single institution. Pre- and post-operative hip-knee-ankle radiographs were classified using the CPAK classification. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and patient satisfaction (4-point-Likert scale) were collected prospectively. Implant survival data was obtained from our national arthroplasty database. We compared the outcomes of patients who maintained or changed their CPAK classification following TKA. Satisfaction was analysed using chi-square test, and OKS was analysed using Mann-Whitney test.Pre-operatively, most patients were CPAK type-I (38.8%). 85.5% of patients changed their CPAK type post-operatively, with CPAK type-V observed in 41.2% of these. Significantly better satisfaction (p=0.033) and OKS (p=0.021) were observed at one-year follow-up in patients who changed CPAK type, although the difference was below OKS minimally important clinical difference. There was no difference in satisfaction (p=0.73) and OKS (p=0.26) at one year between CPAK-V and non-V classifications. Post-operative CPAK type had no correlation with satisfaction and OKS. 12 TKAs (1.1%) were revised within 10 years (3 septic).In this large cohort of MA-TKA, excellent survivorship was observed at 10 years, with no demonstrable difference in outcome related to the final CPAK phenotype or change in phenotype.

The Distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification in a Sample of Spanish Southeast Osteoarthritic Population: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Background and Objectives: The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification is a pragmatic distribution of nine phenotypes for coronal knee alignment that can be used on healthy and arthritic knees. Our study aimed to describe the CPAK distributions in a Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population and compare them to other populations’ published alignment distributions. Method and Materials: Full-leg standing X-rays of the lower limb from 528 cases originating from the so-called Vega Alta del Segura (southeast of the Iberian Peninsula) were retrospectively analysed. We measured the mechanical hip–knee–ankle, lateral distal femoral, and medial proximal tibial angles. We calculated the arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle and the joint line obliquity to classify each case according to the criteria of the CPAK classification. Results: Based on the aHKA result, 59.1% of the cases were varus (less than −2°), 32.7% were neutral (0° ± 2°), and 8.2% were valgus (greater than +2°). Based on the JLO result, 56.7% of the cases had a distal apex (less than 177°), 39.9% had a neutral apex (180° ± 3°), and 3.4% had a proximal apex (greater than 183°). The most common CPAK distribution in our Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population was type I (30.7%), followed by type IV (25.9%), type II (21%), type V (11.2%), type III (5%), type VI (2.8%), type VII (2.4%), type VIII (0.6%), and type IX (0.4%). Conclusions: We described the distribution according to the CPAK classification in a sample of the osteoarthritic population from southeastern Spain. In our sample, more than 75% of the patients were classified as type I, II, and IV.

Gender, BMI, and Age-Related Variations in Lower Limb Alignment Parameters and CPAK Phenotypes in Chinese Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Research on the distribution of and the variation in coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) in the Chinese osteoarthritis population is limited. We aimed to establish the CPAK classification based on the characteristics of lower limb alignment in the Chinese osteoarthritis population. We also investigated variations in lower limb alignment parameters and CPAK phenotypes based on gender, body mass index (BMI), and age. A retrospective study was conducted on a total of 944 knees diagnosed with osteoarthritis in 479 patients from January 2017 to December 2023. A scatterplot was used to describe the distribution of the CPAK classification, and the differences in lower limb alignment parameters and the CPAK classification were compared across genders (male, female), ages (middle-aged/<65 years, elderly/≥65 years), and BMI categories (normal/<25 kg/m2, overweight and obese/≥25 kg/m2) using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. The average arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity (JLO) were -3.03° ± 5.69° and 174.45° ± 4.29°, respectively. There was a higher prevalence of constitutional varus alignment in males and the overweight or obese group, while constitutional valgus alignment was more common in females and the normal BMI group (p < 0.05). Additionally, females had a greater apex distal JLO than males (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in lower limb alignment parameters among different age groups (p > 0.05). Although there were variations in alignment parameters across different genders and BMI categories in the knee osteoarthritis population, the predominant CPAK classifications were type I (38.03%), followed by type II (20.02%) and type IV (17.06%). The most common CPAK types were I, II, and IV, and they were not influenced by gender, BMI, or age, indicating that the CPAK classification can reliably reflect constitutional alignment. A better understanding of native alignment variability can aid in providing patient-specific recommendations when considering orthopedic alignment strategies.

Variability of three-dimensional knee morphology cannot be effectively assessed using a coronal plane knee alignment classification in total knee arthroplasty patients.

Optimal reproduction of the native three-dimensional (3D) alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) influences outcomes; however, much of the modern TKA alignment research, such as the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK), focuses only on coronal alignment. Tibial, femoral and tibiofemoral measurements on the axial and sagittal planes were evaluated for their relationship to the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint-line obliquity (JLO). These 3D anatomical measurements are also evaluated across CPAK groups. A retrospective analysis of the 360 Med Care computed tomography (CT) database was performed. Patient CT scans were segmented and landmarked. Linear regression analysis compared 12 axial and sagittal plane measurements (representing tibial, femoral and tibiofemoral rotation, tibial slope and femoral flexion) with both aHKA and JLO. Nonparametric tests assessed these anatomical measurements across the different CPAK groups, while Cohen's delta (d) determined the effect size. With a sample size of 7450 osteoarthritic knees, significant but weak relationships (r < 0.30) were observed between all 12 anatomical measurements and both aHKA and JLO. Tibiofemoral rotations between Insall's axis and both the posterior condylar and the surgical transepicondylar axes demonstrated large effect sizes (d > 0.80). However, trivial to small effect sizes (d < 0.50) were broadly observed across the 12 axial and sagittal measurements, underscoring their limited clinical significance. While useful for describing coronal knee anatomy, CPAK phenotypes fail to differentiate tibial, femoral and tibiofemoral rotation, tibial slope or femoral flexion-crucial aspects of 3D surgical planning. Therefore, more comprehensive knee phenotyping solutions are required to guide individualised TKA alignment strategies. Level II.

Pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.

The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification has been developed to predict individual variations in inherent knee alignment. The impact of preoperative and postoperative CPAK classification phenotype on the postoperative clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains elusive. This study aimed to examine the effect of postoperative CPAK classification phenotypes (I to IX), and their pre- to postoperative changes on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A questionnaire was administered to 340 patients (422 knees) who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) between September 2013 and June 2019. A total of 231 patients (284 knees) responded. The -Knee Society Score 2011 (KSS 2011), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 (KOOS-12), and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were used to assess clinical outcomes. Using preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior full-leg radiographs, the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) were calculated and classified based on the CPAK classification. To investigate the impact on PROMs, multivariable regression analyses using stepwise selection were conducted, considering factors such as age at surgery, time since surgery, BMI, sex, implant use, postoperative aHKA classification, JLO classification, and changes in aHKA and JLO classifications from preoperative to postoperative. The preoperative and postoperative CPAK classifications were predominantly phenotype I (155 knees; 55%) and phenotype V (73 knees; 26%), respectively. The change in the preoperative to postoperative aHKA classification was a significant negative predictive factor for KOOS-12 and FJS-12, while postoperative apex proximal JLO was a significant negative predictive factor for KSS 2011 and KOOS-12. In primary TKA for OA, preoperative and postoperative CPAK phenotypes were associated with PROMs. Alteration in varus/valgus alignment from preoperative to postoperative was recognized as a negative predictive factor for both KOOS-12 and FJS-12. Moreover, the postoperative apex proximal JLO was identified as a negative factor for KSS 2011 and KOOS-12. Determining the target alignment for each preoperative phenotype with reproducibility could improve PROMs.

UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL ALIGNMENT CORRECTION TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS? THE ROLE OF KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT. STATE OFF THE ART REVIEW

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is in many ways the ultimate kinematic operation as the express aim is to resurface the diseased side of the joint and restore pre-arthritic alignment and balance while maintaining integrity of both cruciate ligaments. An increasing body of knowledge relates the outcomes of UKA to pre-arthritic anatomy rather than an arbitrarily defined neutral. The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification provides a validated technique for calculating pre-arthritic limb alignment (the Arithmetic Hip-Knee-Ankle Ankle (aHKA)) and Joint Line Obliquity (JLO) and will enable a greater understanding of the interactions between pre-arthritic anatomy, choice of prosthetic position and outcomes. When pre-arthritic alignment is not taken into consideration a post-operative limb alignment of mild to moderate varus for medial UKA and moderate valgus for lateral UKA appears produces the best outcomes. When pre-arthritic anatomy is taken into account superior results have been reported with restoration of pre-arthritic limb alignment and joint line obliquity. Restriction boundaries have yet to be clearly defined for tibial component coronal and Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angles when applying this new paradigm, but existing evidence would suggest a 60 varus limit for the tibial coronal angle may be a reasonable starting point. Lateral UKA has inherent differences in terms of tibial component positioning and ligament balance targets. Mobile bearing UKA demands a three-dimensional understanding of the effect of implant position on bearing stability. Modification of technique is necessary to produce anatomic tibia component angles with equipment designed for mechanical alignment. Robotic technology allows accurate understanding of pre-arthritic anatomy, precise reproduction of patient specific virtual planning, equally precise manipulation of soft tissue balance and future research using these platforms likely to further clarify in terms of ideal patient specific component and limb alignment targets.

Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Medial Femoral Condyle in Patients With Varus and Nonvarus Alignment

Background: Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is an effective technique for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee. Coronal-plane malalignment leads to increased contact forces within a compartment and subsequently the cartilage repair site and may lead to higher failure rates. However, the magnitude of the effect of coronal-plane malalignment on graft survivorship and clinical outcomes has not been well characterized. Purpose: To evaluate how varus malalignment affects graft survival and patient-reported outcomes after isolated OCA transplantation of the medial femoral condyle (MFC). Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 70 patients (74 knees) who underwent primary OCA transplantation of the MFC between 2005 and 2019 were identified from a prospectively collected single-surgeon cartilage registry with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Coronal-plane alignment was evaluated utilizing standing hip-to-ankle radiographs. OCA failure, defined as removal of the graft or conversion to arthroplasty, and reoperations were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively using the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, modified Merle d’Aubigné–Postel score, and overall patient satisfaction score. Results: The mean mechanical tibiofemoral angle for patients with varus alignment was 3.9° of varus (range, 1.1° to 8.9°) and for patients with nonvarus alignment it was 0.02° of valgus (range, 3.6° varus to 4.6° valgus). Graft survivorship was 95.3% in the varus group and 95.8% in the nonvarus group (P = .918) at 5 years postoperatively. Reoperations after OCA transplantation occurred in 14.0% of the varus group and 22.6% of the nonvarus group (P = .336). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee total score improved from 45.2 preoperatively to 74.8 at latest follow-up in the varus group and from 40.5 preoperatively to 72.3 at latest follow-up in the nonvarus group. Patient satisfaction was >85%. Conclusion: Patients undergoing isolated OCA transplantation of the MFC had high rates (>90%) of graft survivorship and significant improvements in pain and function. Patients with mild preexisting varus malalignment were found to have no difference in the failure rate or clinical outcomes compared with patients with nonvarus alignment.

Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis.

This study conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the imaging and functional outcomes of patient-specific instrument-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (P-UKA), robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA), and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA). A comprehensive search was performed on five electronic databases and major orthopedic journals as of September 24, 2023. We included randomized controlled studies featuring at least two interventions of P-UKA, R-UKA, or C-UKA. Primary outcomes encompassed the deviation angle of hip-knee-ankle angle, as well as the coronal and sagittal plane alignment of femoral and tibial components. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), surgery time, revision rate, and complication rate. Bayesian framework was employed for risk ratio (RR) or mean deviation (MD) analysis, and treatment hierarchy was established based on rank probabilities. This NMA included 871 knees from 12 selected studies. In sagittal plane, R-UKA exhibited a significantly reduced deviation angle of femoral component compared to P-UKA (MD: 4.16, 95% CI: 0.21, 8.07), and of tibial component in comparison to C-UKA (MD: -2.45, 95% CI: -4.20, -0.68). Notably, the surgery time was significantly longer in R-UKA than in C-UKA (MD: 15.98, 95% CI: 3.11, 28.88). However, no significant differences were observed in other outcomes. Compared with P-UKA or C-UKA, R-UKA significantly improves the femoral and tibial component alignment in the sagittal plane, although this does not translate into discernible differences in functional outcomes. Comprehensive considerations of economic and learning costs are imperative for the judicious selection of the appropriate procedure.

Femoral and tibial phenotypes of varus alignment in a Southeast Asian arthritic population: a descriptive study.

Knowledge of femoral and tibial morphology is important for patient-specific surgery in both joint reconstruction and preservation procedures. Studies evaluating morphological variance in femoral and tibial alignments in Asian populations are scarce. This is the first descriptive study evaluating the femoral and tibial phenotypes of varus alignment in a Southeast Asian population. Long-leg coronal standing radiographs of 2021 limbs were obtained, and the hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle and joint line convergence angle were measured. Joint line obliquity was calculated, and the knees were classified according to the Coronal Plane Alignment of Knee (CPAK) classification. Descriptive analyses on alignment parameters and demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity and body mass index [BMI]) were performed and entered into a linear regression model. The highest frequency of limb alignment in the population was found to be CPAK type I (52.71%, n = 1003). Tibial varus was the largest contributor of varus malignment. Of the varus knees (n = 1247), varus deformity was found solely in the tibia (68.60%), solely in the femur (2.07%) and was contributed by both the femur and the tibia (4.97%). In the linear regression model, BMI was found to be a strong determinant for femoral varus (P = 0.004) and joint line incongruence (P < 0.001). The findings of this study will be important to surgeons during planning for joint preservation procedures (such as corrective osteotomies) and joint arthroplasties to restore alignment.

Effect of Preoperative Coronal Plane Alignment on Actual Versus Predicted Alignment Using Patient Specific Instrumentation in Total Ankle Replacement

Alignment in total ankle replacement is important for success and implant survival. Recently there has been the introduction and adoption of patient specific instrumentation for implantation in total ankle replacement. Current literature does not evaluate the effect of preoperative deformity on accuracy of patient specific instrumentation. A retrospective radiographic analysis was performed on 97 consecutive patients receiving total ankle replacement with patient specific instrumentation to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of the instrumentation. Subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of preoperative deformity. All surgeries were performed by fellowship trained foot and ankle surgeons without industry ties to the implants used. Preoperative and postoperative films were compared to plans based on computerized tomography scans to assess how closely the plan would be implemented in patients. Overall postoperative coronal plane alignment was within 2° of predicted in 87.6% (85 patients). Similarly, overall postoperative sagittal plane alignment was within 2° of predicted in 88.7% (86 patients). Tibial implant size was accurately predicted in 81.4% (79 patients), and talus implant size was correct in 75.3% (73 patients). Patients with preoperative varus deformity had a higher difference between predicted and actual postoperative alignment compared to valgus deformity (1.1° compared to 0.3°, p=0.02). A higher average procedure time was found in varus patients, and more adjunctive procedures were needed in patients with varus or valgus deformity, but these were not significant, p>0.5. Surgeons can expect a high degree of accuracy when using patient specific instrumentation overall, but less accurate in varus deformity.

Radiological Assessment of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Phenotypes in the Romanian Population.

Background: The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification system has been developed as a comprehensive framework delineating nine coronal plane phenotypes, based on arithmetic hip-knee angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of knee phenotypes in the Romanian population using the CPAK classification, encompassing both osteoarthritic and healthy cohorts. Methods: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study, analyzing data from 500 knees with osteoarthritis and 500 healthy knees that met the inclusion criteria. Demographic data were collected, and radiological parameters including lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), aHKA, and JLO were measured. Knee phenotypes were categorized using the CPAK classification. Results: In the osteoarthritic cohort, the most prevalent CPAK phenotype was type I (42.4%), characterized by varus alignment and an apex distal joint. Conversely, in the healthy population, CPAK type II, indicating neutral alignment and an apex distal joint, was the most prevalent phenotype (39.0%). CPAK types VII, VIII, and IX were rare. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate similarities in knee phenotypes compared to other populations, with some minor differences and particularities. The CPAK classification proves to be a valuable tool in assessing knee tyalignment.

Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty does not yield uniform outcomes across all coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes.

Patient dissatisfaction rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reported in the literature reach 20%. The optimal coronal alignment is still under debate. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes in different coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes undergoing mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. The hypothesis was that knees with preoperative varus arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) would achieve inferior clinical outcomes after surgery compared to other aHKA categories. Additionally, another objective was to assess CPAK phenotypes distribution in the study population. A retrospective selection was made of 180 patients who underwent MA TKA from April 2021 to December 2022, with a 1-year follow-up. Coronal knee alignment was classified according to the CPAK classification. Clinical outcome evaluations were measured using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short Form Survey 12and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Differences in clinical outcomes were considered statistically significant with a p value <0 .05. Patients with varus aHKA achieved significantly inferior outcomes at final follow-up compared to other aHKA categories in KSS pt. 1 (79.7 ± 17.2 vs. 85.6 ± 14.7; p = 0.028), OKS (39.2 ± 9.2 vs. 42.2 ± 7.2; p = 0.019) and FJS (75.4 ± 31.0 vs. 87.4 ± 22.9; p =0 .003). The most common aHKA category was the varus category (39%). The most common CPAK phenotypes were apex distal Types I (23.9%), II (22.8%)and III (13.3%). MA TKA does not yield uniform outcomes across all CPAK phenotypes. Varus aHKA category shows significantly inferior results at final follow-up. The most prevalent CPAK categories are varus aHKA and apex distal JLO, with phenotypes I, IIand III being the most common. However, their gender distribution varies significantly. Level IV.

Evaluation of the effect of vascularized fibula graft harvesting on coronal plane alignment and functional outcomes of the lower limb

Recent studies on fibular osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis and possible subsequent biomechanical changes have attracted increasing attention to the topic. Existing studies have focused mainly on proximal fibular osteotomy with short follow-up periods. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in the alignment of the coronal plane of the ankle and knee joints in patients who underwent vascularized fibula graft harvest (VFGH). The evaluation was based on functional outcomes and radiological measurements.In the comparison between the VFGH side and the contralateral side, no significant differences in the knee inclination (KI) or talar inclination (TI) angle, knee medial clear space (K-MCS) or ankle medial clear space (A-MCS) distance were noted. However, a significant difference in the hip knee (HKA) angle was observed between the operated and nonoperated sides (0.3° ± 1.8° and 1.5° ± 1.9°, respectively [p = 0.019]). Statistically significant differences in both the knee society score (KSS) and the AOFAS scores were found between the ipsilateral donor limb and the contralateral healthy limb. Although the contralateral healthy side had better clinical scores than the VFGH side, the outcomes of the VFGH side were still satisfactory or excellent.

Increased prevalence of valgus constitutional alignment subtypes in a South African arthritic population group using the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification

BackgroundKnee alignment philosophies and patient specific models to improve patient reported outcomes are gaining increasing attention. The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification describes nine knee phenotypes and then proposes surgical alignment strategies to achieve constitutional alignment. The CPAK classification has been validated in Australian, European, Asian and North American population groups. To date no African data has been analyzed using CPAK. MethodsA total of 344 arthritic patients (608 knees) with appropriate long leg radiographs were classified based on the CPAK type. Measurements included mechanical hip-knee-angle(mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and the derived calculations of joint line obliquity (JLO) and arithmetic hip-knee-angle (aHKA). ResultsThe sample population was 77.9% (n = 268) female with a mean age of 68.4 ± 9.2 years. The most common CPAK types in order were type 3 (n = 174; 28.6%), type 2 (n = 155; 25.5%), type 1 (n = 94; 15.5%) and type 6 (n = 80; 13.2%). The most common limb alignment types were valgus (CPAK types 3,6,9; 41.8%). ConclusionThis study, which investigated arthritic patients from a single institution in South Africa, shows a divergence of CPAK phenotypic knee patterns relative to other international studies, with much higher proportions of valgus phenotypes (3 and 6). This regional difference should be further investigated in other South African and African population samples and used to adapt the surgical strategies employed by local surgeons.

Large angular correction of arithmetic coronal alignment is associated with residual lateral laxity after total knee arthroplasty in varus knees for Japanese patients.

One of the most common types of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) is type I, which is characterised by varus alignment and apex distal joint line obliquity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of changes in arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) with both postoperative joint laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with CPAK type I following mechanical alignment (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Of 111 consecutive knees in 92 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA, 80 knees (72.0%) with CPAK type I phenotype preoperatively were evaluated. All TKAs were performed to achieve neutral MA by a medial stabilising gap balancing technique. Pre- to postoperative change in aHKA was defined as ΔaHKA. The 80 CPAK type I knees were divided into a larger ΔaHKA group (>7°) and a smaller ΔaHKA group (≤7°). PROMs, including the Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score-12, were assessed before and 2 years after surgery. Pre- and postoperative joint laxity was assessed using a Telos arthrometer. Twenty-two knees showed a larger ΔaHKA, and postoperative lateral joint laxity in varus stress was significantly greater in these patients than in those with a smaller ΔaHKA (6.8° vs. 4.5°, p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between the groups in PROMs (p = n.s.). Postoperative lateral laxity was associated with larger aHKA changes than smaller aHKA changes in CPAK type I knees after TKA. However, no statistically significant differences in PROMs were found according to the amount of change in aHKA. Level III.

Kinematic Alignment Achieves a More Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasty Than Mechanical Alignment among CPAK Type I Patients: A Simulation Study

Background: There is no consensus on whether mechanical alignment (MA) or kinematic alignment (KA) should be chosen for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) Type I with a varus arithmetic HKA (aHKA) and apex distal joint line obliquity (JLO). The aim of this study was to investigate whether MA or KA is preferable for soft tissue balancing in TKA for this phenotype. Method: This prospective cohort study included 64 knees with CPAK Type I osteoarthritis that had undergone cruciate-retaining TKA. Using optical tracking software, we simulated implant placement in the Mako system before making the actual bone cut and compared the results between MA and KA. Extension balance (the difference between medial and lateral gaps in extension) and medial balance (the difference in medial gaps in flexion and extension) were examined. These gap differences within 2 mm were defined as good balance. Achievement of overall balance was defined as an attainment of good extension and medial balance. The incidence of balance in each patient was compared with an independent sample ratio test. Results: Compared with the MA group, the KA group achieved better soft tissue balance in extension balance (p &lt; 0.001). A total of 75% of the patients in the KA group achieved overall balance, which was greater than the 38% achieved in the MA group (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: In robot-assisted TKA for CPAK Type I osteoarthritis, KA achieved knee balance during extension without soft tissue release in a greater percentage of patients than MA.