Coronal Fast Low Angle Shot Research Articles

Accuracy and longitudinal reproducibility of quantitative femorotibial cartilage measures derived from automated U-Net-based segmentation of two different MRI contrasts: data from the osteoarthritis initiative healthy reference cohort

ObjectiveTo evaluate the agreement, accuracy, and longitudinal reproducibility of quantitative cartilage morphometry from 2D U-Net-based automated segmentations for 3T coronal fast low angle shot (corFLASH) and sagittal double echo at steady-state (sagDESS) MRI.Methods2D U-Nets were trained using manual, quality-controlled femorotibial cartilage segmentations available for 92 Osteoarthritis Initiative healthy reference cohort participants from both corFLASH and sagDESS (n = 50/21/21 training/validation/test-set). Cartilage morphometry was computed from automated and manual segmentations for knees from the test-set. Agreement and accuracy were evaluated from baseline visits (dice similarity coefficient: DSC, correlation analysis, systematic offset). The longitudinal reproducibility was assessed from year-1 and -2 follow-up visits (root-mean-squared coefficient of variation, RMSCV%).ResultsAutomated segmentations showed high agreement (DSC 0.89–0.92) and high correlations (r ≥ 0.92) with manual ground truth for both corFLASH and sagDESS and only small systematic offsets (≤ 10.1%). The automated measurements showed a similar test–retest reproducibility over 1 year (RMSCV% 1.0–4.5%) as manual measurements (RMSCV% 0.5–2.5%).DiscussionThe 2D U-Net-based automated segmentation method yielded high agreement compared with manual segmentation and also demonstrated high accuracy and longitudinal test–retest reproducibility for morphometric analysis of articular cartilage derived from it, using both corFLASH and sagDESS.

Relationship between knee pain and the presence, location, size and phenotype of femorotibial denuded areas of subchondral bone as visualized by MRI

Conflicting associations between imaging biomarkers and pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been reported. A relation between pain and denuded areas of subchondral bone (dABs) has been suggested and this study explores this relationship further by relating the presence, phenotype, location and size of dABs to different measures of knee pain. 633 right knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) (250 men, age 61.7±9.6yrs, BMI 29.4±4.7kg/m(2)) were included. Manual segmentation of the femorotibial cartilage plates was performed on 3T coronal fast low angle shot with water excitation (FLASHwe) images. dABs were defined as areas where the subchondral bone was uncovered by cartilage. The following measures of pain were used: weightbearing-, non-weightbearing-, moderate-to-severe-, infrequent- and frequent knee pain. Using pain measures from subjects without dABs as a reference, those with at least one dAB hada 1.64-fold higher prevalence ratio [PR, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-2.18] to have frequent and 1.45-fold higher for moderate-to-severe knee pain (95% CI 1.13-1.85). Subjects with dABs in central subregions had a 1.53-fold increased prevalence of having weightbearing pain (95% CI 1.20-1.97), especially when the central subregion was moderately (>10%) denuded (PR 1.81, 95% CI 1.35-2.42). Individuals with cartilage-loss-type dABs had a slightly higher prevalence (PR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27) of having frequent knee pain compared to individuals with intra-chondral-osteophyte-type dABs. This study supports a positive relation between femorotibial dABs and knee pain, especially when the dABs are located centrally (i.e., in weightbearing regions) or when the respective central subregion is moderately denuded.

Comparison between different implementations of the 3D FLASH sequence for knee cartilage quantification

To compare several sequence implementations of the 3D FLASH sequence in the context of quantitative cartilage imaging. Test-retest coronal fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequences with water excitation were acquired in knees of 12 healthy participants, using two 1.5 T scanners from the same manufacturer. On one of the scanners, the FLASH was additionally compared with a FLASH VIBE, 75% with 100% slice resolution, a non-selective with a conventional spatial pulse, and "asymmetric echo allowed" with "not allowed". Implementations of the FLASH showed systematic differences of up to 3.3%, but these were not statistically significant. Precision errors were similar between protocols, but tended to be smallest for the FLASH VIBE with 100% slice resolution (0.6-6.7%). In the medial tibia cartilage volume and thickness differed significantly (P < 0.01; 6.2 and 5.9%) between the two scanners. Using a validated FLASH sequence, one can reduce slice resolution to 75% and allow asymmetric echo without sacrificing precision, in order to reduce the total acquisition time. However, in longitudinal studies, the scanner and the specific sequence implementation should be kept constant between baseline and follow-up, in order to avoid systematic off-sets in the measurements.

Comparison of 1-year vs 2-year change in regional cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis results from 346 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

To compare femorotibial cartilage thickness changes over a 2- vs a 1-year observation period in knees with radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA). One knee of 346 Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) participants was studied at three time points [baseline (BL), year-1 (Y1), year-2 (Y2) follow-up]: 239 using coronal fast low angle shot (FLASH) and 107 using sagittal double echo at steady state (DESS) MR imaging. Changes in cartilage thickness were assessed in femorotibial cartilage plates and subregions, after manual segmentation with blinding to time-point. The standardized response mean (SRM) of total joint cartilage thickness over 2 years was modestly higher than over 1 year (FLASH: -0.44 vs -0.32/-0.28 [first/second year]; DESS: -0.42 vs -0.39/-0.18). For the subregion showing the largest change per knee (OV1), the 2-year SRM was similar or lower (FLASH: -1.20 vs -1.22/-1.61; DESS: -1.38 vs -1.64/-1.51) than the 1-year SRM. The changes in total joint cartilage thickness were not significantly different in the first and second year (FLASH: -0.8% vs -0.7%; DESS: -1.3% vs -0.8%) and were negatively correlated. Analysis of smallest detectable changes (SDCs) revealed that only few participants displayed significant progression in both consecutive periods. The location of the subregion contributing to OV1 in each knee was highly inconsistent between the first and second year observation period. The SRM of region-based cartilage thickness change in OA is modestly larger following a 2-year vs a 1-year observation period, while it is relatively similar when an OV-approach is chosen. Structural progression displays strong temporal and spatial heterogeneity at an individual knee level that should be considered when planning clinical trials.

Sensitivity to change of cartilage morphometry using coronal FLASH, sagittal DESS, and coronal MPR DESS protocols – comparative data from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI)

The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) is targeted at identifying sensitive biomarkers and risk factors of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) onset and progression. Quantitative cartilage imaging in the OAI relies on validated fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequences that suffer from relatively long acquisition times, and on a near-isotropic double echo steady-state (DESS) sequence. We therefore directly compared the sensitivity to cartilage thickness changes and the correlation of these protocols longitudinally. Baseline (BL) and 12 month follow-up data of 80 knees were acquired using 1.5 mm coronal FLASH and 0.7 mm sagittal DESS (sagDESS) sequences. In these and in 1.5 mm coronal multi-planar reconstructions (MPR) of the DESS the medial femorotibial cartilage was segmented with blinding to acquisition order. In the weight-bearing femoral condyle, a 60% (distance between the trochlear notch and the posterior femur) and a 75% region of interest (ROI) were studied. The standardized response mean (SRM = mean change/standard deviation of change) in central medial femorotibial (cMFTC) cartilage thickness was -0.34 for coronal FLASH, -0.37 for coronal MPR DESS, -0.36 for sagDESS with the 60% ROI, and -0.38 for the 75% ROI. Using every second 0.7 mm sagittal slice (DESS) yielded similar SRMs in cMFTC for the 60% and 75% ROI from odd (-0.35/-0.36) and even slice numbers (-0.36/-0.39), respectively. BL cartilage thickness displayed high correlations (r > or = 0.94) between the three protocols; the correlations of longitudinal changes were > or = 0.79 (Pearson) and > or = 0.45 (Spearman). Cartilage morphometry with FLASH and DESS displays similar longitudinal sensitivity to change. Analysis of every second slice of the 0.7 mm DESS provides adequate sensitivity to change.

Impact of coil design on the contrast‐to‐noise ratio, precision, and consistency of quantitative cartilage morphometry at 3 Tesla: A pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative

Phased-array (PA) coils generally provide higher signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) than quadrature knee coils. In this pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) we compared these two types of coils in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), precision, and consistency of quantitative femorotibial cartilage measurements. Test-retest measurements were acquired using coronal fast low-angle shot with water excitation (FLASHwe) and coronal multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) of sagittal double-echo steady state with water excitation (DESSwe) at 3T. The precision errors for cartilage volume and thickness were <or=2.6% for the quadrature coil and <or=2.3% for the PA coil with FLASHwe, and <or=2.3%/<or=2.5% with DESSwe. The precision for aggregate medial and lateral cartilage measures was significantly higher than that for single plates, independently of coil and sequence. The PA coil measurements did not always fully agree with the quadrature coil measurements, and some differences were significant. The higher CNR of the PA coil did not translate directly into improved precision of cartilage measurement; however, summing up cartilage plates within the medial and lateral compartment reduced precision errors.