Corepressor Peptide Research Articles

PPARγ Corepression Involves Alternate Ligand Conformation and Inflation of H12 Ensembles.

Inverse agonists of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) have emerged as safer alternatives to full agonists for their reduced side effects while still maintaining impressive insulin-sensitizing properties. To shed light on their molecular mechanism, we characterized the interaction of the PPARγ ligand binding domain with SR10221. X-ray crystallography revealed a novel binding mode of SR10221 in the presence of a transcriptionally repressing corepressor peptide, resulting in much greater destabilization of the activation helix, H12, than without corepressor peptide. Electron paramagnetic resonance provided in-solution complementary protein dynamic data, which revealed that for SR10221-bound PPARγ, H12 adopts a plethora of conformations in the presence of corepressor peptide. Together, this provides the first direct evidence for corepressor-driven ligand conformation for PPARγ and will allow the development of safer and more effective insulin sensitizers suitable for clinical use.

Biochemical and structural basis for the pharmacological inhibition of nuclear hormone receptor PPARγ by inverse agonists

Recent studies have reported that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) pathway is activated in approximately 40% of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This led us to investigate pharmacological repression of PPARγ as a possible intervention strategy. Here, we characterize PPARγ antagonists and inverse agonists and find that the former behave as silent ligands, whereas inverse agonists (T0070907 and SR10221) repress downstream PPARγ target genes leading to growth inhibition in bladder cancer cell lines. To understand the mechanism, we determined the ternary crystal structure of PPARγ bound to T0070907 and the corepressor (co-R) peptide NCOR1. The structure shows that the AF-2 helix 12 (H12) rearranges to bind inside the ligand-binding domain, where it forms stabilizing interactions with the compound. This dramatic movement in H12 unveils a large interface for co-R binding. In contrast, the crystal structure of PPARγ bound to a SR10221 analog shows more subtle structural differences, where the compound binds and pushes H12 away from the ligand-binding domain to allow co-R binding. Interestingly, we found that both classes of compound promote recruitment of co-R proteins in biochemical assays but with distinct conformational changes in H12. We validate our structural models using both site-directed mutagenesis and chemical probes. Our findings offer new mechanistic insights into pharmacological modulation of PPARγ signaling.

Abstract C53: Liver X receptor ligand targets glutamine metabolism in pancreatic cancer

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most prevalent form of pancreatic cancer. It is predicted to become the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030. PDAC has a poor survival rate of 5 years with a 7% success rate. Current treatments include nontargeted highly toxic chemotherapeutic agents. More than 95% of PDAC patients have activating mutations of Kristen RAt Sarcoma virus (KRAS) gene, and it is known to drive metabolic reprogramming that increases cancer cell survival and resistance against the chemotherapeutic drugs. KRAS promotes noncanonical consumption of glutamine by upregulating the expression of glutaminase 1 (GLS1) enzyme. This, in turn, supports PDAC growth and survival by maintaining redox homeostasis and also by replenishing citric acid cycle intermediates. Liver X receptor beta (LXRβ), a nuclear receptor, is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that is ubiquitously expressed in all tissues. It plays an important role in maintaining cholesterol, lipid, and glucose homeostasis under normal physiologic conditions. Agonist-bound LXRβ activates the transcription of genes involved in lipogenesis, reverse cholesterol transport, and glucose metabolism. Our group has previously shown that LXRβ is expressed in PDAC tissues, and treatment with GW3965, an LXRβ agonist, reduced PDAC proliferation. However, LXRβ agonists have adverse side effects of increasing liver and circulating triglycerides. This study identified a novel ligand of LXRβ 1E5, which significantly reduced PDAC cell proliferation. 1E5 decreased the basal expression of LXRβ target genes such as sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1c) and ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1 (ABCA1). It also increased the binding of co-repressor peptides such as nuclear receptor co-repressor (NCoR) and silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT) to the LXRβ ligand binding domain, whereas it decreased the binding of the co-activator peptide as demonstrated by the time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer (TR-FRET) assay, thereby inhibiting the transcriptional activity of LXRβ. Therefore, 1E5 acts as an LXRβ inverse agonist. Furthermore, the metabolomics study revealed that 1E5 disrupts glutamine metabolism in PDAC cells by downregulating the glutamine, aspartate, and alpha-ketoglutarate levels in cells. Gene expression analysis showed that it significantly downregulated GLS1 expression. These results demonstrate that the novel inverse agonist is a candidate agent in the treatment of PDAC by targeting glutamine metabolism. Citation Format: Shivangi Srivastava, Scott Widmann, Chin-Yo Lin. Liver X receptor ligand targets glutamine metabolism in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Science and Clinical Care; 2019 Sept 6-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(24 Suppl):Abstract nr C53.

Ligand Binding Induces Agonistic-Like Conformational Adaptations in Helix 12 of Progesterone Receptor Ligand Binding Domain.

Progesterone receptor (PR) is a member of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily and plays a vital role in the female reproductive system. The malfunction of it would lead to several types of cancers. The understanding of conformational changes in its ligand binding domain (LBD) is valuable for both biological function studies and therapeutically intervenes. A key unsolved question is how the binding of a ligand (agonist, antagonist, or a selective modulator) induces conformational changes of PR LBD, especially its helix 12. We applied molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to explore the conformational adaptations of PR LBD with or without a ligand or the co-repressor peptides binding. From the simulations, both the agonist progesterone (P4) and the selective PR modulator (SPRM) asoprisnil induces agonistic-like helix 12 conformations (the “closed” states) in PR LBD and the complex of LBD-SPRM is less stable, comparing to the agonist-liganded PR LBD. The results, therefore, explain the partial agonism of the SPRM, which could induce weak agonistic effects in PR. We also found that co-repressor peptides could be stably associated with the LBD and stabilize the LBD in a “semi-open” state for helix 12. These findings would enhance our understanding of PR structural and functional relationships and would also be useful for future structure and knowledge-based drug discovery.

Ternary crystal structure of human ROR\u03b3 ligand-binding-domain, an inhibitor and corepressor peptide provides a new insight into corepressor interaction

Retinoic acid-related orphan receptor gamma (RORγ) plays pivotal roles in autoimmune diseases by controlling the lineage of interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing CD4+ T cells (Th17 cells). Structure-based drug design has proven fruitful in the development of inhibitors targeting the ligand binding domain (LBD) of RORγ. Here, we present the crystal structure of a novel RORγ inhibitor co-complex, in the presence of a corepressor (CoR) peptide. This ternary complex with compound T reveals the structural basis for an inhibitory mechanism different from the previously reported inverse agonist. Compared to the inverse agonist, compound T induces about 2 Å shift of helix 5 (H5) backbone and side-chain conformational changes of Met365 on H5. These conformational changes correlate to reduced CoR peptide binding to RORγ-LBD in the presence of compound T, which suggests that the shift of H5 is responsible. This crystal structure analysis will provide useful information for the development of novel and efficacious drugs for autoimmune disorders.

PPARγ in Complex with an Antagonist and Inverse Agonist: a Tumble and Trap Mechanism of the Activation Helix

SummaryPeroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor and target for antidiabetics that increase insulin sensitivity. Owing to the side effects of PPARγ full agonists, research has recently focused on non-activating ligands of PPARγ, which increase insulin sensitivity with decreased side effects. Here, we present the crystal structures of inverse agonist SR10171 and a chemically related antagonist SR11023 bound to the PPARγ ligand-binding domain, revealing an allosteric switch in the activation helix, helix 12 (H12), forming an antagonist conformation in the receptor. H12 interacts with the antagonists to become fixed in an alternative location. Native mass spectrometry indicates that this prevents contacts with coactivator peptides and allows binding of corepressor peptides. Antagonists of related nuclear receptors act to sterically prevent the active configuration of H12, whereas these antagonists of PPARγ alternatively trap H12 in an inactive configuration, which we have termed the tumble and trap mechanism.

Probing Dominant Negative Behavior of Glucocorticoid Receptor β through a Hybrid Structural and Biochemical Approach.

Glucocorticoid receptor β (GRβ) is associated with glucocorticoid resistance via dominant negative regulation of GRα. To better understand how GRβ functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of GRα at a molecular level, we determined the crystal structure of the ligand binding domain of GRβ complexed with the antagonist RU-486. The structure reveals that GRβ binds RU-486 in the same ligand binding pocket as GRα, and the unique C-terminal amino acids of GRβ are mostly disordered. Binding energy analysis suggests that these C-terminal residues of GRβ do not contribute to RU-486 binding. Intriguingly, the GRβ/RU-486 complex binds corepressor peptide with affinity similar to that of a GRα/RU-486 complex, despite the lack of helix 12. Our biophysical and biochemical analyses reveal that in the presence of RU-486, GRβ is found in a conformation that favors corepressor binding, potentially antagonizing GRα function. This study thus presents an unexpected molecular mechanism by which GRβ could repress transcription.

A genetically selected cyclic peptide inhibitor of BCL6 homodimerization

We report an inhibitor of the homodimeric protein-protein interaction of the BCL6 oncoprotein, identified from a genetically encoded SICLOPPS library of 3.2 million cyclic hexapeptides in combination with a bacterial reverse two-hybrid system. This cyclic peptide is shown to bind the BTB domain of BCL6, disrupts its homodimerization, and subsequent binding of the SMRT2 corepressor peptide.

From RORγt Agonist to Two Types of RORγt Inverse Agonists.

Biaryl amides as new RORγt modulators were discovered. The crystal structure of biaryl amide agonist 6 in complex with RORγt ligand binding domain (LBD) was resolved, and both "short" and "long" inverse agonists were obtained by removing from 6 or adding to 6 a proper structural moiety. While "short" inverse agonist (8) recruits a corepressor peptide and dispels a coactivator peptide, "long" inverse agonist (9) dispels both. The two types of inverse agonists can be utilized as potential tools to study mechanisms of Th17 transcriptional network inhibition and related disease biology.

Conformational Diversity of the Helix 12 of the Ligand Binding Domain of PPARγ and Functional Implications

Nuclear hormone receptors (NR) are transcription factors that activate gene expression in response to ligands. Structural and functional studies of the ligand binding domains (LBD) of NRs revealed that the dynamics of their C-terminal helix (H12) is fundamental for NR activity. H12 is rigid and facilitates binding of coactivator proteins in the agonist-bound LBD. In the absence of ligand, H12 exhibits increased flexibility. To provide a comprehensive picture of the H12 conformational equilibrium, extensive molecular dynamics simulations of the LBD of the PPARγ receptor in the presence or absence of ligand, and of coactivators and corepressor peptides, were performed. Free-energy profiles of the conformational variability of the H12 were obtained from more than four microseconds of simulations using adaptive biasing-force calculations. Our results demonstrate that, without ligand, multiple conformations of the H12 are accessible, including agonist-like conformations. We also confirm that extended H12 conformations are not accessible at ordinary temperatures. Ligand binding stabilizes the agonist H12 conformation relative to other structures, promoting a conformational selection. Similar effects are observed with coactivator association. The presence of corepressor peptides stabilizes conformations not allowed in the ligand-free, Rosiglitazone-bound or coactivator-bound LBDs. Corepressor binding, therefore, induces a conformational transition in the protein. Nevertheless, initial stages of corepressor dissociation could be induced by the ligand as it stabilizes the H12 in agonist form. Therefore, the present results provide a comprehensive picture of the H12 motions and their functional implications, with molecular resolution.

Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Human CAR Inverse Agonists

Constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), along with pregnane x receptor (PXR), is an important metabolic sensor in the hepatocytes. Like all other nuclear receptors (NRs), CAR works in concert with coregulator proteins, coactivators, and corepressors which bind to the NRs. The main basis for the receptor to distinguish between coactivators and corepressors is the position of the C-terminal helix 12 (H12), which is determined by the bound NR ligand. CAR, having constitutive activity, can be repressed or further activated by its ligands. Crystal structure of human CAR bound to an agonist and a coactivator peptide is available, but no structural information on an inverse agonist-bound human CAR and a corepressor exists. In our previous molecular dynamics (MD) studies, no corepressor peptide was included. Therefore, probably due to the strong interactions which keep the relatively short H12 of CAR in the active position, the structural changes elicited by inverse agonists were very subtle, and H12 of CAR seemed to more or less retain its active conformation. Here, we have run a series of MD simulations to study the movement of H12 in the presence of both activating and repressing ligands as well as a corepressor peptide. The presence of the corepressor on the coregulator surface of CAR induced a clear shift of H12 of the inverse agonists-bound CAR. In general, H12 moved toward H10 and not away from the ligand binding domain, as seen in some other NRs. However, H12 of CAR is short enough that this movement seems to be adequate to accommodate the binding of the corepressor.

The oligomeric state of thyroid receptor regulates hormone binding kinetics

We previously reported that mutations in the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) surface that mediates dimer and heterodimer formation do not alter affinity for cognate hormone (triiodothyronine (T(3))) yet dramatically enhance T(3) association and dissociation rates. This study aimed to show that TR oligomeric state influences binding and dissociation kinetics. We performed binding assays using marked hormone ((125)I-T(3)) and TRs expressed and purified by different methods. We find that T(3) associates with TRs with biphasic kinetics in solution; a rapid step (half-life ±0.1 h) followed by a slower second step (half-life ±5 h) and that purification of monomers suggests that biphasic kinetics are due to the presence of monomers and dimers in our preparations. In support of this idea, incubation of TR ligand binding domain monomers with corepressor peptide induces dimer formation and decreases association rates and T(3) binds to, and dissociates from, a TRβ mutant that only forms dimers (TRβD355R) with slow single-phase kinetics. In addition, heterodimer formation with retinoid X receptors also influences ligand binding kinetics. Together, these results suggest that the dimer/heterodimer surface is allosterically coupled to the hormone binding pocket and that different interactions at this surface exert different effects on ligand binding that may be relevant for TR actions in the cell.

A Designed Cell-Permeable Aptamer-Based Corepressor Peptide Is Highly Specific for the Androgen Receptor and Inhibits Prostate Cancer Cell Growth in a Vector-Free Mode

The repression of the androgen receptor (AR) activity is a major objective to inhibit prostate cancer growth. One underlying mechanism for efficient hormone therapy is based on corepressors that inactivate the AR. In line with this, castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with malfunction or reduced corepressor action. To overcome this, the overexpression of endogenous corepressors, however, affects many other transcription factors. Therefore, an AR-specific corepressor could be of advantage. Using a yeast peptide aptamer two-hybrid screen with the full-length human AR, we identified a short amino acid-stretch that binds specifically to the human AR in yeast and in mammalian cells and not to the closely related progesterone or glucocorticoid receptors. Furthermore, fused to a silencing domain, this aptamer-based corepressor (AB-CoR) exhibits corepressor activity by inhibiting both the AR-mediated transactivation and expression of the AR target gene PSA. Furthermore, stable expression of the AB-CoR inhibits growth of human LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Moreover, we generated a cell-permeable AB-CoR by fusing a protein transduction domain to establish a vector-free transport system. Treatment of LNCaP cells with the bacterially expressed and affinity-purified cell-permeable AB-CoR peptide resulted in a significant inhibition of both AR-mediated transactivation and prostate cancer cell proliferation. Thus, generation of a novel AR-specific aptamer-based corepressor may present a vector-free inhibition of AR-dependent prostate cancer growth as a novel approach.

Cloning of cDNA and prediction of peptide structure of Plzf expressed in the spermatogonial cells of Labeo rohita

The promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (Plzf) gene containing an evolutionary conserved BTB (bric-a-brac/tramtrack/broad complex) domain plays a key role in self-renewal of mammalian spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) via recruiting transcriptional co-repressors. Little is known about the function of Plzf in vertebrate, especially in fish species. To gain better understanding of its role in fishes, we have cloned Plzf from the testis of Labeo rohita (rohu), a commercially important freshwater carp. The full-length cDNA contains an open reading frame (ORF) of 2004 bp translatable to 667 amino acids (aa) containing a conserved N-terminal BTB domain and C-terminal C 2H 2-zinc finger motifs. L. rohita Plzf, which is phylogenetically related to Danio rerio counterpart, abundantly expressed in spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). A three-dimensional (3D) model of BTB domain of Plzf protein was constructed by homology modeling approach. Molecular docking on this 3D structure established a homo-dimer between two BTB domains creating a charged pocket containing conserved aa residues: L33, C34, D35 and R49. Thus, Plzf of SSC is structurally and possibly functionally conserved. The conserved aa residues in the cleft resulting from Plzf BTB self-association are likely to be the binding platform for interaction with recruited co-repressor peptides. The identified Plzf could be the first step towards exploring its role in rohu SSC behavior.

The X-ray Structure of RU486 Bound to the Progesterone Receptor in a Destabilized Agonistic Conformation

Here we describe the 1.95 A structure of the clinically used antiprogestin RU486 (mifepristone) in complex with the progesterone receptor (PR). The structure was obtained by taking a crystal of the PR ligand binding domain containing the agonist norethindrone and soaking it in a solution containing the antagonist RU486 for extended times. Clear ligand exchange could be observed in one copy of the PR ligand binding domain dimer in the crystal. RU486 binds while PR is in an agonistic conformation without displacing helix 12. Although this is probably because of the constraints of the crystal lattice, it demonstrates that helix 12 displacement is not a prerequisite for RU486 binding. Interestingly, B-factor analysis clearly shows that helix 12 becomes more flexible after RU486 binding, suggesting that RU486, being a model antagonist, does not induce one fixed conformation of helix 12 but changes its positional equilibrium. This conclusion is confirmed by comparing the structures of RU486 bound to PR and RU486 bound to the glucocorticoid receptor.

Characterization of ligands for thyroid receptor subtypes and their interactions with co-regulators

Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are nuclear receptors that are activated by thyroid hormone ligands and co-regulator proteins. Two receptor subtypes, TRα and TRβ, have been suggested to play a role in numerous physiological functions. However, specificity of receptor subtype function and co-regulator interaction is unclear due to the lack of TR subtype-specific ligands. Five TR ligands were evaluated for their selectivity and interaction with the TR subtypes. A multiplex assay was used to identify co-regulator peptide interaction, and biochemical assays were used to characterize ligand–receptor specificity. In the biochemical assay, rank order ligand potencies were similar in the presence of co-activator peptides, SRC1-2 and SRC3-2, and the co-repressor peptide, NCoR1-2, with T3 and Triac potencies greater in the presence of the co-repressor. The potency of Tetrac was similar regardless of the co-regulator used while T4 and rT3 demonstrated selectivity for TRα subtype. The rank order among TR ligands at either receptor subtype in the biochemical assay correlated with the multiplex assay. These assays can be used to identify new ligands that can provide further insight into TR biology.

Structure of a BCOR Corepressor Peptide in Complex with the BCL6 BTB Domain Dimer

The transcriptional corepressors BCOR, SMRT, and NCoR are known to bind competitively to the BCL6 BTB domain despite the fact that BCOR has no detectable sequence similarity to the other two corepressors. We have identified a 17 residue motif from BCOR that binds directly to the BCL6 BTB domain and determined the crystal structure of the complex to a resolution of 2.6 A. Remarkably, the BCOR BCL6 binding domain (BCOR(BBD)) peptide binds in the same BCL6 binding site as the SMRT(BBD) peptide despite the lack of any significant sequence similarity between the two peptides. Mutations of critical BCOR(BBD) residues cause the disruption of the BCL6 corepression activities of BCOR, and a BCOR(BBD) peptide blocks BCL6-mediated transcriptional repression and kills lymphoma cells.

Crystal Structure of Human Estrogen-related Receptor α in Complex with a Synthetic Inverse Agonist Reveals Its Novel Molecular Mechanism

Inverse agonists of the constitutively active human estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha, NR3B1) are of potential interest for several disease indications (e.g. breast cancer, metabolic diseases, or osteoporosis). ERRalpha is constitutively active, because its ligand binding pocket (LBP) is practically filled with side chains (in particular with Phe(328), which is replaced by Ala in ERRbeta and ERRgamma). We present here the crystal structure of the ligand binding domain of ERRalpha (containing the mutation C325S) in complex with the inverse agonist cyclohexylmethyl-(1-p-tolyl-1H-indol-3-ylmethyl)-amine (compound 1a), to a resolution of 2.3A(.) The structure reveals the dramatic multiple conformational changes in the LBP, which create the necessary space for the ligand. As a consequence of the new side chain conformation of Phe(328) (on helix H3), Phe(510)(H12) has to move away, and thus the activation helix H12 is displaced from its agonist position. This is a novel mechanism of H12 inactivation, different from ERRgamma, estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, and ERbeta. H12 binds (with a surprising binding mode) in the coactivator groove of its ligand binding domain, at a similar place as a coactivator peptide. This is in contrast to ERRgamma but resembles the situation for ERalpha (raloxifene or 4-hydroxytamoxifen complexes). Our results explain the novel molecular mechanism of an inverse agonist for ERRalpha and provide the basis for rational drug design to obtain isotype-specific inverse agonists of this potential new drug target. Despite a practically filled LBP, the finding that a suitable ligand can induce an opening of the cavity also has broad implications for other orphan nuclear hormone receptors (e.g. the NGFI-B subfamily).

The Use of in Vitro Peptide Binding Profiles and in Silico Ligand-Receptor Interaction Profiles to Describe Ligand-Induced Conformations of the Retinoid X Receptor α Ligand-Binding Domain

It is hypothesized that different ligand-induced conformational changes can explain the different interactions of nuclear receptors with regulatory proteins, resulting in specific biological activities. Understanding the mechanism of how ligands regulate cofactor interaction facilitates drug design. To investigate these ligand-induced conformational changes at the surface of proteins, we performed a time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay with 52 different cofactor peptides measuring the ligand-induced cofactor recruitment to the retinoid X receptor-alpha (RXRalpha) in the presence of 11 compounds. Simultaneously we analyzed the binding modes of these compounds by molecular docking. An automated method converted the complex three-dimensional data of ligand-protein interactions into two-dimensional fingerprints, the so-called ligand-receptor interaction profiles. For a subset of compounds the conformational changes at the surface, as measured by peptide recruitment, correlate well with the calculated binding modes, suggesting that clustering of ligand-receptor interaction profiles is a very useful tool to discriminate compounds that may induce different conformations and possibly different effects in a cellular environment. In addition, we successfully combined ligand-receptor interaction profiles and peptide recruitment data to reveal structural elements that are possibly involved in the ligand-induced conformations. Interestingly, we could predict a possible binding mode of LG100754, a homodimer antagonist that showed no effect on peptide recruitment. Finally, the extensive analysis of the peptide recruitment profiles provided novel insight in the potential cellular effect of the compound; for the first time, we showed that in addition to the induction of coactivator peptide binding, all well-known RXRalpha agonists also induce binding of corepressor peptides to RXRalpha.

The Ligand-Dependent Interaction of Mineralocorticoid Receptor with Coactivator and Corepressor Peptides Suggests Multiple Activation Mechanisms

We investigated the coregulator (coactivator and corepressor) interactions with the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) that lead to activation and inhibition of the receptor in the presence of agonist and/or antagonist. Our results indicate that MR ligand binding domain (LBD) interacts strongly with only a few specific coactivator peptides in the presence of the agonist aldosterone and that these interactions are blocked by the antagonist eplerenone. We also discovered that cortisol, the preferred physiological ligand for the glucocorticoid receptor in humans, is a partial MR agonist/antagonist, providing a possible molecular explanation of the tissue-selective effects of glucocorticoids on MR. However, when we examined the coactivator and corepressor peptide interactions in the presence of cortisol, we found that MR bound with cortisol or aldosterone interacted with the same set of peptides. Thus, the partial agonism shown by cortisol is unlikely to be the result of differential interaction with known coactivators and corepressors. On the other hand, we have identified coactivator binding groove mutations that are critical for cortisol activation but not for aldosterone activation, suggesting that the two steroids induce different MR LBD conformations. In addition, we also show that cortisol becomes full agonist when S810L mutation is introduced in the LBD of MR. Interestingly, MR antagonists, such as eplerenone and progesterone, become partial agonist/antagonist of S810L but are still able to recruit LXXLL peptides to the mutant receptor. Together, these findings suggest a model to explain the MR activation by various ligands.