Core Entrustable Professional Activities Research Articles

Assessing readiness: the impact of an experiential learning entrustable professional activity-based residency preparatory course

ABSTRACT As medical schools move to integrate the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (EPAs) into curricula and address the transition from student to resident, residency preparatory courses have become more prevalent. The authors developed an experiential learning EPA-based capstone course for assessment to determine impact on learner self-assessed ratings of readiness for residency and acquisition of medical knowledge. All fourth-year students from the classes of 2018–2020 completed a required course in the spring for assessment of multiple EPAs, including managing core complaints, performing basic procedures, obtaining informed consent, and providing patient handoffs. Learners selected between three specialty-based parallel tracks – adult medicine, surgery, or pediatrics. Students completed a retrospective pre-post questionnaire to provide self-assessed ratings of residency preparedness and comfort in performing EPAs. Finally, the authors studied the impact of the course on knowledge acquisition by comparing student performance in the adult medicine track on multiple choice pre- and post-tests. Four hundred and eighty-one students were eligible for the study and 452 (94%) completed the questionnaire. For all three tracks, there was a statistically significant change in learner self-assessed ratings of preparedness for residency from pre- to post-course (moderately or very prepared: adult medicine 61.4% to 88.6% [p-value < 0.001]; surgery 56.8% to 81.1% [p-value < 0.001]; pediatrics 32.6% to 83.7% [p-value 0.02]). A similar change was noted in all tracks in learner self-assessed ratings of comfort from pre- to post-course for all studied EPAs. Of the 203 students who participated in the adult medicine track from 2019–2020, 200 (99%) completed both the pre- and post-test knowledge assessments. The mean performance improved from 65.0% to 77.5% (p-value < 0.001). An experiential capstone course for the assessment of EPAs can be effective to improve learner self-assessed ratings of readiness for residency training and acquisition of medical knowledge.

American Dental Education Association Compendium Entrustable Professional Activities Workgroup report.

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are discrete clinical tasks that can be evaluated to help define readiness for independent practice in the health professions and are intended to increase trust in the dental graduate. EPAs provide a framework that bridges competencies to clinical practice. This report describes the work of the American Dental Education Association (ADEA) Compendium EPA Workgroup to develop a list of EPAs for dental education and supportive resources, including specifications and a glossary. Preliminary work including literature and resource review, mapping of existing competencies, and review of other health professions' EPAs informed the development of our EPAs list. Workgroup members achieved consensus using a modified Delphi process. A Qualtrics survey using a validated rubric for the assessment of EPAs as described in peer-reviewed literature was used. Dental educators, including academic deans, were surveyed for feedback on the content and format of the EPAs. Based on findings in the literature analysis of existing EPAs and competencies in health professions, a list of EPAs was developed along with a description of specifications. The EPA workgroup (nine members from multiple institutions) used the Delphi process in receiving feedback from various experts. A list of 11 core EPAs was vetted by dental educators including academic deans (n=∼23), and the process of development was reviewed by EPAs experts outside dental education. A glossary was developed to align language. These EPAs define the scope of dental practice. This report represents Phase 1 of the EPA framework development and vetting process. Future directions will include a broader vetting of the EPA list, faculty development, and national standardized technology that support this work to optimize implementation.

An Analysis of Workplace-Based Assessments for Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency: Does Type of Clinical Assessor Influence Level of Supervision Ratings?

The authors describe use of the workplace-based assessment (WBA) coactivity scale according to entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and assessor type to examine how diverse assessors rate medical students using WBAs. A WBA data collection system was launched at Oregon Health and Science University to visualize learner competency in various clinical settings to foster EPA assessment. WBA data from January 14 to June 18, 2021, for medical students (all years) were analyzed. The outcome variable was level of supervisor involvement in each EPA, and the independent variable was assessor type. A total of 7,809 WBAs were included. Most fourth-, third-, and second-year students were assessed by residents or fellows (755 [49.5%], 1,686 [48.5%], and 918 [49.9%], respectively) and first-year students by attending physicians (803 [83.0%]; P < .001). Attendings were least likely to use the highest rating of 4 (1 was available just in case; 2,148 [56.7%] vs 2,368 [67.7%] for residents; P < .001). Learners more commonly sought WBAs from attendings for EPA 2 (prioritize differential diagnosis), EPA 5 (document clinical encounter), EPA 6 (provide oral presentation), EPA 7 (form clinical questions and retrieve evidence-based medicine), and EPA 12 (perform general procedures of a physician). Residents and fellows were more likely to assess students on EPA 3 (recommend and interpret diagnostic and screening tests), EPA 4 (enter and discuss orders and prescriptions), EPA 8 (give and receive patient handover for transitions in care), EPA 9 (collaborate as member of interprofessional team), EPA 10 (recognize and manage patient in need of urgent care), and EPA 11 (obtain informed consent). Learners preferentially sought resident vs attending supervisors for different EPA assessments. Future research should investigate why learners seek different assessors more frequently for various EPAs and if assessor type variability in WBA levels holds true across institutions.

A Modified Delphi Consensus Approach to Define Entrustable Professional Activities for Neurocritical Care Advanced Practice Providers.

To define consensus entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for neurocritical care (NCC) advanced practice providers (APPs), establish validity evidence for the EPAs, and evaluate factors that inform entrustment expectations of NCC APP supervisors. A three-round modified Delphi consensus process followed by application of the EQual rubric and assessment of generalizability by clinicians not affiliated with academic medical centers. Electronic surveys. NCC APPs (n = 18) and physicians (n = 12) in the United States with experience in education scholarship or APP program leadership. None. The steering committee generated an initial list of 61 possible EPAs. The panel proposed 30 additional EPAs. A total of 47 unique nested EPAs were retained by consensus opinion. The steering committee defined six core EPAs addressing medical knowledge, procedural competencies, and communication proficiency which encompassed the nested EPAs. All core EPAs were retained and subsequently met the previously described cut score for quality and structure using the EQual rubric. Most clinicians who were not affiliated with academic medical centers rated each of the six core EPAs as very important or mandatory. Entrustment expectations did not vary by prespecified groups. Expert consensus was used to create EPAs for NCC APPs that reached a predefined quality standard and were important to most clinicians in different practice settings. We did not identify variables that significantly predicted entrustment expectations. These EPAs may aid in curricular design for an EPA-based assessment of new NCC APPs and may inform the development of EPAs for APPs in other critical care subspecialties.

Implementation and faculty perception of outpatient medical student workplace-based assessments.

There is growing interest in use of entrustable professional activity (EPA)-grounded workplace-based assessments (WBAs) to assess medical students through direct observation in the clinical setting. However, there has been very little reflection on how these tools are received by the faculty using them to deliver feedback. Faculty acceptance of WBAs is fundamentally important to sustained utilisation in the clinical setting, and understanding faculty perceptions of the WBA as an adjunct for giving targeted feedback is necessary to guide future faculty development in this area. Use of a formative EPA-grounded WBA was implemented in the ambulatory setting during the paediatrics clerkship following performance-driven training and frame-of-reference training with faculty. Surveys and semi-structured interviews with faculty members explored how faculty perceived the tool and its impact on feedback delivery. Faculty reported providing more specific, task-oriented feedback following implementation of the WBA, as well as greater timeliness of feedback and greater satisfaction with opportunities to provide feedback, although these later two findings did not reach significance. Themes from the interviews reflected the benefits of WBAs, persistent barriers to the provision of feedback and suggestions for improvement of the WBA. EPA-grounded WBAs are feasible to implement in the outpatient primary care setting and improve feedback delivery around core EPAs. The WBAs positively impacted the way faculty conceptualise feedback and provide learners with more actionable, behaviour-based feedback. Findings will inform modifications to the WBA and future faculty development and training to allow for sustainable WBA utilisation in the core clerkship.

Next steps for workplace-based assessments of entrustable professional activities.

Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine (FIU-HWCOM) participated in the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) implementation pilot. Entrustment decision processes based on data from workplace-based assessments (WBAs) were piloted. Outcomes illustrated challenges including variability across EPAs with regards to learner level alignment and feasibility of data collection in the form of WBAs. In addition, students reported discomfort requesting WBA completion by preceptors and dissatisfaction with associated feedback. To guide future directions, we conducted a survey of third-year students to better understand their experience with and perceptions of WBAs used to evaluate EPAs at FIU-HWCOM. Survey response was 96% (n= 107/112). Most (84%) reported that WBAs were not valuable to their development and that preceptors often did not complete WBAs in a timely fashion. Many (47%) reported not receiving verbal feedback. Most students (78%) used language in written responses demonstrating confusion between the EPAs and the WBAs used to assess them. The use of WBAs to assess EPAs did not have its intended impact at FIU-HWCOM. For future classes, WBA forms will consist of paper cards with questions directly assessing performance of skills aligned with EPAs 1, 5 and 6 only. To continue to promote feedback, students will be required to collect WBAs on all clerkships, but the number of required WBAs will be less than prior and no entrustment decisions will be made.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for medical radiation technologists in Taiwan: a nationwide experience

BackgroundCompetency-based medical education (CBME) is an outcomes-oriented approach focused on developing competencies that translate into clinical practice. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) bridge competency assessment and clinical performance by delineating essential day-to-day activities that can be entrusted to trainees. EPAs have been widely adopted internationally, but not yet implemented for medical radiation professionals in Taiwan.Materials and methodsA nationwide consensus process engaged 97 experts in radiation technology education representing diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, and nuclear medicine. Preliminary EPAs were developed through the focus group discussion and the modified Delphi method. The validity of these EPAs was evaluated using the QUEPA and EQual tools.ResultsThrough iterative consensus building, six core EPAs with 18 component observable practice activities (OPAs) in total were developed, encompassing routines specific to each radiation technology specialty. QUEPA and EQual questionnaire data verified these EPAs were valid, and of high quality for clinical teaching and evaluation.ConclusionThe consensus development of tailored EPAs enables rigorous competency assessment during medical radiation technology education in Taiwan. Further expansion of EPAs and training of clinical staff could potentially enhance care quality by producing competent professionals.

How well do workplace-based assessments support summative entrustment decisions? A multi-institutional generalisability study.

Assessment of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency requires direct observation through workplace-based assessments (WBAs). Single-institution studies have demonstrated mixed findings regarding the reliability of WBAs developed to measure student progression towards entrustment. Factors such as faculty development, rater engagement and scale selection have been suggested to improve reliability. The purpose of this investigation was to conduct a multi-institutional generalisability study to determine the influence of specific factors on reliability of WBAs. The authors analysed WBA data obtained for clerkship-level students across seven institutions from 2018 to 2020. Institutions implemented a variety of strategies including selection of designated assessors, altered scales and different EPAs. Data were aggregated by these factors. Generalisability theory was then used to examine the internal structure validity evidence of the data. An unbalanced cross-classified random-effects model was used to decompose variance components. A phi coefficient of >0.7 was used as threshold for acceptable reliability. Data from 53 565 WBAs were analysed, and a total of 77 generalisability studies were performed. Most data came from EPAs 1 (n = 17 118, 32%) 2 (n = 10 237, 19.1%), and 6 (n = 6000, 18.5%). Low variance attributed to the learner (<10%) was found for most (59/77, 76%) analyses, resulting in a relatively large number of observations required for reasonable reliability (range = 3 to >560, median = 60). Factors such as DA, scale or EPA were not consistently associated with improved reliability. The results from this study describe relatively low reliability in the WBAs obtained across seven sites. Generalisability for these instruments may be less dependent on factors such as faculty development, rater engagement or scale selection. When used for formative feedback, data from these instruments may be useful. However, such instruments do not consistently provide reasonable reliability to justify their use in high-stakes summative entrustment decisions.

Designing the Future of Medical Education: The EPA Framework as a Catalyst to Inform Family Planning and Reproductive Health Fellowship Training Program in Ethiopia Medical Education: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Method Study.

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are tasks or responsibilitieswithin a specific field that can be given to a learneronce they are competent to perform them independently. EPAs are being used in various specialty programs and serving as valuable tool to inform educational program. However, due to disparities in professional practice between different contexts, the automatic transfer of a set of core EPAs is not feasible. Hence, our study aims to develop an EPA framework to inform the Family Planning and Reproductive Health Fellowship Program in the local context of Ethiopia. We employed an exploratory mixed-method design, which involved the collection of qualitative data using the Nominal Group Technique and quantitative data through a nationwide survey in all residency training institutions across the country. Qualitative data analysis involved several steps, including compiling a list of tasks, removing duplicate tasks, reviewing EPAs using criteria and an equal rubric tool. For quantitative data analysis, descriptive statistics, validity index analysis, and intra-class correlation coefficients, were used. Seven senior panelists were able to propose a total of 57 EPAs, with 17 remaining after qualitative data analysis. The panelist evaluated the relevance of each EPA in the second phase. As a result, 17 EPAs received a content validity index of >0.83, indicating satisfactory relevance. In the national survey, experts reached a high level of final agreement regarding the relevance and representativeness of all 17 EPAs (ICC = 0.815, 95% CI [0.0.756,0.865], p.0001). The final set of 17 end-of-training EPAs is valid, acceptable and representative of the discipline, and they can be used as a framework to inform Family planning and Reproductive Health Fellowship Program in Ethiopian medical education once these core EPA statements are described in sufficient detail. This can contribute to raise the quality of training and hence the quality of patient care.

An Appy That Needs Epi: An Atypical Presentation of Anaphylaxis.

An Appy That Needs Epi: An Atypical Presentation of Anaphylaxis.

Development of Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Indonesian Undergraduate Medical Education: The Experience of Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Indonesia has implemented Competency-Based Education (CBE) since 2006 based on a national standard for physician competencies. This study aimed to develop Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Indonesian undergraduate medical programs to remedy the challenge of translating competencies into professional activities in CBE. Two rounds of modified Delphi were employed in October-November 2022. The research subjects selected were (i) experts in medicine such as internal medicine, surgery, medical education, etc., and (ii) medical teachers in the preclinical/clinical stage for two years or more. Fifteen experts were involved in both Delphi rounds. The first Delphi instrument referring to literature frameworks included 34 professional activities for individual healthcare tasks and 17 for family-community medicine/public health. The second Delphi instruments used were based on the first-round results. After the first Delphi, 31 individual healthcare tasks and all family-community medicine/public health tasks reached a consensus. One expert suggested two additional family-community medicine/public health activities. The second Delphi instrument listed the percentage of agreement for individual healthcare tasks and family-community medicine/public health tasks, including the two additional activities. After the second-round of Delphi, two individual healthcare tasks and one family-community medicine/public health task had not reached a consensus However, 94.7% of activities were still acceptable as Core EPAs in family-community medicine and public health services. In conclusion, developing EPAs for undergraduate medical programs using two rounds of the Delphi method resulted in 32 individual medical service activities and 18 family medicine-community/public health tasks. These core EPAs were expected to facilitate the translation of competencies into professional activities.

Should Obtaining Informed Consent Be Considered an Entrustable Professional Activity? Insights From Whether and How Attendings Entrust Surgical Trainees.

Because residents are frequently delegated the task of obtaining consent early in their training, the American Association of Medical Colleges describes "obtaining informed consent" as a core entrustable professional activity (EPA) for medical school graduates. However, prior studies demonstrated that residents frequently perform this task without receiving formal instruction or assessment of competency. This study sought to understand how attending physicians decide to delegate obtaining informed consent for surgical procedures to trainees. The authors conducted a survey of attending surgeons at a university-based health care system of 6 affiliated teaching hospitals (October-December 2020) to collect data about current entrustment practices and attendings' knowledge, experience, and attitudes surrounding the informed consent process. Summary statistics and bivariate analyses were applied. Eighty-five attending surgeons participated (response rate, 49.4%) from diverse specialties, practice types, and years in practice. Fifty-eight of 85 (68.2%) stated they "never" granted responsibility for the consent conversation to a trainee and 74/81 (91.4%) reported they typically repeated their own consent conversation whenever a trainee already obtained consent. The most common reasons they retained responsibility for consent were ethical duty (69/82, 84.1%) and the patient relationship (65/82, 79.3%), while less than half (40/82, 48.8%) described concerns about trainee competency. Reflecting on hypothetical clinical scenarios, increased resident competency did not correspond with increased entrustment (P = 0.27 - 0.62). Nearly all respondents (83/85, 97.7%) believed residents should receive formal training, however, only 41/85 (48.2%) felt additional training and assessment of residents might change their current entrustment practices. Attendings view informed consent as an ethical and professional obligation that typically cannot be entrusted to trainees. This practice is discordant with previous literature studying residents' perspectives. Furthermore, resident competency does not play a predominant role in this decision, calling into question whether informed consent can be considered an EPA.

Reimagining Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Undergraduate Medical Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.

The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and its extensive potential for integration into many aspects of health care signal a transformational shift within the health care environment. In this context, medical education must evolve to ensure that medical trainees are adequately prepared to navigate the rapidly changing health care landscape. Medical education has moved toward a competency-based education paradigm, leading the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to define a set of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) as its practical operational framework in undergraduate medical education. The AAMC's 13 core EPAs for entering residencies have been implemented with varying levels of success across medical schools. In this paper, we critically assess the existing core EPAs in the context of rapid AI integration in medicine. We identify EPAs that require refinement, redefinition, or comprehensive change to align with the emerging trends in health care. Moreover, this perspective proposes a set of "emerging" EPAs, informed by the changing landscape and capabilities presented by generative AI technologies. We provide a practical evaluation of the EPAs, alongside actionable recommendations on how medical education, viewed through the lens of the AAMC EPAs, can adapt and remain relevant amid rapid technological advancements. By leveraging the transformative potential of AI, we can reshape medical education to align with an AI-integrated future of medicine. This approach will help equip future health care professionals with technological competence and adaptive skills to meet the dynamic and evolving demands in health care.

Developing entrustable professional activities for general dentistry at the University of North Carolina.

As part of curriculum innovation, the University of North Carolina (UNC) Adams School of Dentistry identified core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) that graduates must demonstrate for practice readiness. This paper describes the development of the UNC EPAs and the perceptions of the general dentistry faculty. Upon establishing a blueprint of knowledge, skills, and attitudes of UNC graduates, using a distributed leadership approach, faculty teams developed EPAs focused on the patient care process. The American Dental Education Association Compendium of Clinical Competency Assessments and Commission on Dental Accreditation Standards informed the team's work. Perceptions of the assessment framework were examined using a questionnaire completed by 13 general dentistry faculty considering the importance, accuracy, and agreement of each EPA, associated domains of competence, and encounter management on a 6-point rating scale. Distributed leadership was a useful strategy in EPA development to disperse decision-making and build ownership. Through multiple iterations, four EPAs (assessment, plan of care, collaborative care, and provision of care) with associated sub-EPAs emerged. EPAs included a description, required knowledge and skills, and rubrics for assessment. The general dentistry faculty reported a high level of importance, accuracy, and agreement with EPAs, domains of competence, and encounter management. EPAs provide a standardized manner to describe the comprehensive work dentists perform, shifting away from individual competencies. The UNC EPAs provide the foundation for longitudinal measures of competence preparing graduates for independent practice. With limited EPAs frameworks available in dentistry, we aim to inform the development and implementation of EPAs across dental education.

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for undergraduate medical education – development and exploration of social validity

BackgroundThe development of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as a framework for work-based training and assessment in undergraduate medical education has become popular. EPAs are defined as units of a professional activity requiring adequate knowledge, skills, and attitudes, with a recognized output of professional labor, independently executable within a time frame, observable and measurable in its process and outcome, and reflecting one or more competencies. Before a new framework is implemented in a specific context, it is valuable to explore social validity, that is, the acceptability by relevant stakeholders.AimThe aim of our work was to define Core EPAs for undergraduate medical education and further explore the social validity of the constructs.Method and materialIn a nationwide collaboration, EPAs were developed using a modified Delphi procedure and validated according to EQual by a group consisting of teachers nominated from each of the seven Swedish medical schools, two student representatives, and an educational developer (n = 16). In the next step, social validity was explored in a nationwide survey. The survey introduced the suggested EPAs. For each EPA, the importance of the EPA was rated, as was the rater’s perception of the present graduates’ required level of supervision when performing the activity. Free-text comments were also included and analyzed.ResultsTen Core EPAs were defined and validated. The validation scores for EQual ranged from 4.1 to 4.9. The nationwide survey had 473 responders. All activities were rated as “important” by most responders, ranging from 54 to 96%. When asked how independent current graduates were in performing the ten activities, 6 to 35% reported “independent”. The three themes of the free text comments were: ‘relevant target areas and content’; ‘definition of the activities’; and ‘clinical practice and learning’.ConclusionTen Core EPAs were defined and assessed as relevant for Swedish undergraduate medical education. There was a consistent gap between the perceived importance and the certainty that the students could perform these professional activities independently at the time of graduation. These results indicate that the ten EPAs may have a role in undergraduate education by creating clarity for all stakeholders.

Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology

ObjectivesTo develop and validate European entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal (HB/GI) diagnostic imaging.Materials and methodsBoth European Society of Radiology and national curricula in HB/GI diagnostic radiology were thoroughly reviewed, resulting in preliminary EPAs drafted by a pilot group of expert radiologists in 2 different countries. Each EPA was fully described with 7 components (Specification/limitations; Potential risks of failing; Relevant domains of competence; Required experience, knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; Assessment information sources to assess progress and ground a summative entrustment decision; Entrustment for which level of supervision is to be reached; and Expiration date). The modified Delphi method with 3 Delphi rounds was chosen for validation. Content validity index (CVI) and median values were used for validation.ResultsThere were 15 preliminary EPAs, some of them divided according to 2 levels: resident and fellow level. The 37 members of the Delphi group were based in 2 different European countries with a background experience of 10 represented countries. Subsequent to the first Delphi round, 6 EPAs were accepted (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4), 6 needed major revisions (CVI 0.7–0.79, median ≥ 4), 3 were rejected (CVI < 0.7) and 1 was added. After the second Delphi round, both the 6 revised EPAs and the additional one met the validation criteria (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4). Finally, 13 EPAs were validated during the 3rd Delphi round with an agreement percentage of 95–100%.ConclusionThis study creates and validates EPAs for sub-specialised HB/GI diagnostic imaging.Critical relevance statementThirteen EPAs for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal diagnostic imaging were created with a strong methodology, and as a first example set in sub-specialised diagnostic imaging, they provide a template for others to be created.Key points• The competence-based teaching in medical studies has recently been reintroduced through EPAs.• Thirteen EPAs have been developed for hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal sub-specialised diagnostic imaging.• These EPAs were validated using a Delphi modified method and provide a template for other to be created.Graphical abstract

Descriptive survey of pharmacy students’ self-evaluation of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPE) and practice readiness using entrustable professional activities

Objective: To evaluate pharmacy students’ self-identified levels of entrustability before and after their advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPE). Methods: Third and fourth-year pharmacy students completed a Qualtrics survey where they were asked to self-identify their entrustability level (scale of I–V) on each of the fifteen core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for pharmacy graduates. Results: A total of 249 third-year students completed the APPE-readiness survey in the Fall of 2017–2019, and 106 fourth-year students completed the practice-readiness survey in the Spring of 2018. The highest entrustability level in both surveys was “create a written plan for continuous professional development”. The lowest reported entrustability levels in both surveys were: “Oversee the pharmacy operations…”, “Maximise the appropriate use of medications…,” and “Establish patient-centred goals and create a plan…”. The largest area of change from pre-APPE to post-APPE was overseeing pharmacy operations, with an increase of 26%. The average pre-APPE entrustment level was 3.72, increasing to 4.2 in the practice readiness portion. The percentage of students self-reporting below an entrustment level of 3 in the practice-readiness survey ranged from 0–0.99%. Conclusion: Pharmacy students increased their self-reported level of entrustability over all 15 EPA domains from pre-APPE to post-APPE year.

Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Entry-Level Physical Therapist Competencies: Update by Academy of Cardiovascular &amp; Pulmonary Physical Therapy Task Force

Purpose: Competency-based education and creation of profession-based entrustable professional activities are current trends in physical therapist (PT) education. The purpose of this project is to determine the current entry-level PT competencies for cardiovascular &amp; pulmonary (CVP) physical therapy. Methods: The Academy of Cardiovascular &amp; Pulmonary Physical Therapy Competency Task Force was established to update and expand previous competencies. A mixed method approach of Subject Matter Expert (SME) consensus (modified Delphi process) and a broader survey process was used to develop these entry-level competencies. With SME guidance, a modified version of the levels of competence, None-to-Proficient, was adopted based on previous competency work by the American Council of Academic Physical Therapy. Results: Twenty-nine SME members engaged in the consensus process, and 268, 194, 305, and 222 respondents completed the 4 surveys, respectively. Six hundred fifty-one competency items were rated across most Commission on the Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education Standard 7 Curriculum areas, following the patient–client management model. Conclusions: These competencies establish specific expected levels of knowledge, skills, and behaviors essential for entry-level CVP PT practice. Adopting these competencies will help lay the groundwork for future competency-based PT education and aid in the development of the physical therapy profession's core entrustable professional activities.

Evaluating the Quality of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for New Pharmacy Graduates.

This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Core Entrustable Professional Activities (Core EPAs) for New Pharmacy Graduates according to standards outlined in competency-based education literature utilizing the Queen's EPA Quality (EQual) rubric. A cohort of pharmacists with EPA expertise rated Core EPA quality with the EQual rubric and provided recommendations for revisions. A generalizability study determined the reliability of the EQual ratings with pharmacist users. Nine pharmacists responded (4.4%). Most EPAs (9/15) did not reach the overall cut-off score, indicating low quality. EPAs 1 through 5 and EPA 14 (fulfill a medication order) were deemed high quality. EPA 12 (use evidence-based information to advance patient care) scored the lowest at 3.47 (SEM 0.29). EPA 14 scored the highest at 4.60 (SEM 0.14). EPA 15 (create a written plan for continuous professional development) was the only EPA to fail to reach the cut-off across all EQual domains. EPAs in the Patient Care Provider Domain received significantly higher ratings than other EPAs. On average, three respondents recommended revision for each. Most comments aligned with the EPA's EQual rubric performance. The generalizability study analysis revealed excellent reliability (G = 0.80). Determining EPA quality utilizing objective measurement tools should drive EPA development and revisions to more accurately reflect the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of pharmacists on the healthcare team.

National consensus on entrustable professional activities for competency-based training in anaesthesiology.

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) are specialty specific tasks or responsibilities, combining the clinical workplace and the long-demanded competency-based medical education. The first step to transform time-based into EPA-based training is to reach consensus on core EPAs that describe sufficiently the workplace. We aimed to present a nationally validated EPA-based curriculum for postgraduate training in anaesthesiology. Using a predefined and validated list of EPAs, we applied a Delphi consensus approach, involving all German chair directors of anaesthesiology. We then conducted a subsequent qualitative analysis. Thirty-four chair directors participated in the Delphi survey (77% response) and twenty-five completed all the questions (56% overall response). Reflected by the intra-class-correlation, the consensus on the importance (ICC: 0.781, 95% CI [0.671, 0.868]) and the year of entrustment (ICC: 0.973, 95% CI [0.959, 0.984]) of each EPA reached high levels of agreement among the chair directors. The comparison of data assessed in the preceding validation and present study showed excellent and good levels of agreement (ICC entrustment: 0.955, 95% CI [0.902, 0.978]; ICC importance: 0.671, 95% CI [-0.204, 0.888]). The adaptation process, based on the qualitative analysis, resulted in a final set of 34 EPAs. We present an elaborate, fully described and nationally validated EPA-based curriculum, reflecting a broad consensus among different stakeholders of anaesthesiology. We hereby provide a further step towards competency-based postgraduate anaesthesiology training.