Core Binding Factor Beta Research Articles

Regulation of Skeletal Development and Maintenance by Runx2 and Sp7.

Runx2 (runt related transcription factor 2) and Sp7 (Sp7 transcription factor 7) are crucial transcription factors for bone development. The cotranscription factor Cbfb (core binding factor beta), which enhances the DNA-binding capacity of Runx2 and stabilizes the Runx2 protein, is necessary for bone development. Runx2 is essential for chondrocyte maturation, and Sp7 is partly involved. Runx2 induces the commitment of multipotent mesenchymal cells to osteoblast lineage cells and enhances the proliferation of osteoprogenitors. Reciprocal regulation between Runx2 and the Hedgehog, fibroblast growth factor (Fgf), Wnt, and parathyroid hormone-like hormone (Pthlh) signaling pathways and Dlx5 (distal-less homeobox 5) plays an important role in these processes. The induction of Fgfr2 (Fgf receptor 2) and Fgfr3 expression by Runx2 is important for the proliferation of osteoblast lineage cells. Runx2 induces Sp7 expression, and Runx2+ osteoprogenitors become Runx2+Sp7+ preosteoblasts. Sp7 induces the differentiation of preosteoblasts into osteoblasts without enhancing their proliferation. In osteoblasts, Runx2 is required for bone formation by inducing the expression of major bone matrix protein genes, including Col1a1 (collagen type I alpha 1), Col1a2, Spp1 (secreted phosphoprotein 1), Ibsp (integrin binding sialoprotein), and Bglap (bone gamma carboxyglutamate protein)/Bglap2. Bglap/Bglap2 (osteocalcin) regulates the alignment of apatite crystals parallel to collagen fibrils but does not function as a hormone that regulates glucose metabolism, testosterone synthesis, and muscle mass. Sp7 is also involved in Co1a1 expression and regulates osteoblast/osteocyte process formation, which is necessary for the survival of osteocytes and the prevention of cortical porosity. SP7 mutations cause osteogenesis imperfecta in rare cases. Runx2 is an important pathogenic factor, while Runx1, Runx3, and Cbfb are protective factors in osteoarthritis development.

Abstract 5589: CBFB::MYH11 expression activates Trp53 in myeloid cells, which inhibits cell growth and sensitizes cells to cytarabine

Abstract CBFB::MYH11 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a subset of Core Binding Factor AML initiated by an oncofusion in which Core Binding Factor Beta (CBFB) is fused to the C-terminus of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain 11 (MYH11). CBFB::MYH11 AML has a high cure rate with conventional anthracycline/cytarabine induction and high-dose cytarabine consolidation in patients under the age of 60, and remains chemosensitive after multiple relapses; the mechanisms underlying chemosensitivity are unknown. TP53 is a key regulator of DNA damage response and apoptosis, and TP53-mutated AML is often chemoresistant. Large sequencing studies have revealed only rare co-occurrence of TP53 mutations with CBFB::MYH11. We initially used CBFB::MYH11 as a negative control for an unrelated study of TP53 function and unexpectedly found striking synergy. While expression of CBFB::MYH11 in WT murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) induced a low-penetrance (~20%), long latency (~6 months) myelomonocytic AML, expression of CBFB::MYH11 in Trp53-/- HSPCs induced AML with 100% penetrance and a median latency of 8 weeks. CBFB::MYH11-induced AMLs arising in Trp53-/- cells were similar by morphology and flow cytometry phenotype. We validated these findings in a second model, using a conditional Trp53flox/flox x Vav1-Cre model in which Trp53 is inactivated in HSPCs, with nearly identical results. Trp53-/- cells transduced with Empty Vector did not develop AML, but did develop T cell lymphoma with a median latency of 16 weeks, similar to prior studies. Trp53 deficiency also cooperated with RUNX1::RUNX1T1, the other Core Binding Factor oncofusion, to induce a high-penetrance (100%) and short latency AML (median latency 10 weeks); consistent with prior data, RUNX1::RUNX1T1 expression alone in Trp53 WT cells was insufficient to induce AML. To determine whether Trp53 influences the chemosensitivity of CBFB::MYH11 expressing cells, we performed cytarabine dose-response experiments. While CBFB::MYH11-transduced WT HSPCs were very sensitive to cytarabine (relative to EV), sensitivity was reduced in CBFB::MYH11-transduced Trp53-/- cells, suggesting that CBFB::MYH11-induced chemosensitivity is, at least in part, mediated by the TP53 pathway. To determine whether CBFB::MYH11 expression results in upregulation of key TP53 pathway genes, we transduced WT HSPCs with EV or CBFB::MYH11, transplanted cells into WT mice, harvested bone marrow at 3 months, and performed RNA-Seq. Key TP53 pathway genes were upregulated, including Bbc3/Puma, Bax, Cdkn1a/p21, and Trp53 (all 2.6-4.6-fold, p≤0.05). These data suggest that the chemosensitivity and the favorable prognosis of CBFB::MYH11 AML may be due to the direct activation of the TP53 pathway by CBFB::MYH11. Similar studies are underway with RUNX1::RUNX1T1-transduced cells to determine whether TP53 is relevant for the chemosensitivity of that CBF AML as well. Citation Format: Ryan B. Day, Julia A. Hickman, Casey D. Katerndahl, Sai Mukund Ramakrishnan, Christopher A. Miller, Timothy J. Ley. CBFB::MYH11 expression activates Trp53 in myeloid cells, which inhibits cell growth and sensitizes cells to cytarabine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5589.

Abstract A145: CBFβ supports global protein translation in osteosarcoma and may provide a new therapeutic target

Abstract Background: Core binding factor beta (CBFβ) is a binding partner to the RUNX family of DNA binding transcription factors (RUNX1-3) and acts as a transcriptional co-activator by allosterically increasing their affinity for DNA. RUNX2 is the master regulator of bone growth and differentiation, and its binding to CBFβ is of particular interest to osteosarcoma (OS) research. Notably, increased expression of each is correlated with poor disease-free and overall survival in numerous sarcomas. CBFβ’s transcriptional role is well-understood but recent research in breast cancer cells proposes a non-canonical role in the regulation of protein translation, influencing translation of hundreds of mRNA transcripts via binding with heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNPK). The binding of CBFβ to hnRNPK or RUNX1 is reportedly mutually exclusive, suggesting possible interplay between the two roles. We hypothesize that CBFβ regulates protein translation in OS, participating in the translation of RUNX2 and other oncoproteins, promoting a malignant phenotype. Furthermore, we propose that disrupting its translational role may result in an antitumor effect. While CBFβ’s transcriptional activities are well-characterized, we endeavored to isolate its translational role and investigate its contribution to OS. Methods: CRISPR/Cas9 was used to generate a CBFβ knockout (KO) U2OS cell line, while site-directed mutagenesis of CBFβ and lentiviral transduction of U2OS CBFβ KO cells was used to generate cell lines expressing FLAG-tagged wild type (WT) mutant CBFβ. Western Blotting (WB) was used to assess changes in protein expression and subcellular localization while RUNX2 mRNA expression was measured via qPCR and RNAseq. CBFβ’s interacting partners were identified by Immunoprecipitation Mass Spectrometry (IP-MS). Cellular electro-thermal shift assay was used to evaluate influences of CBFβ mutations on RUNX2 and hnRNPK binding. The Click-IT system followed by WB and IP-MS were used to assess global protein translation and synthesis rates of specific proteins, respectively. Results: CBFβ and hnRNPK interact in U2OS cells and loss of CBFβ leads to a decrease in global protein translation. This results in decreased RUNX2 protein, but not mRNA, expression. Re-introduction of WT CBFβ caused RUNX2 protein levels to recover while expression of CBFβ with key mutations in the binding interface abrogated this effect. Importantly, we observed this was not due to direct protection of RUNX2 from proteasomal degradation by WT CBFβ. We identified a cohort of proteins that appear to be translationally regulated by CBFβ and investigated the impact of CBFβ mutations on its translational activities and RUNX2 binding. We also identified a list of putative CBFβ protein-protein interactions in human OS cells that are altered by these mutations. Conclusions: CBFβ appears to participate in protein translation in OS, regulating the expression of numerous oncoproteins including RUNX2. Key mutations in CBFβ designed to interrupt RUNX2 binding also affect this non-canonical activity of CBFβ. Citation Format: Nicholas A Oldberg, Dayn R Godinez, Luke A Wittenburg. CBFβ supports global protein translation in osteosarcoma and may provide a new therapeutic target [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A145.

Highlights from Recent Cancer Literature.

Highlights from Recent Cancer Literature.

Runx2 regulates chromatin accessibility to direct the osteoblast program at neonatal stages.

SUMMARYThe transcriptional regulator Runx2 (runt-related transcription factor 2) has essential but distinct roles in osteoblasts and chondrocytes in skeletal development. However, Runx2-mediated regulatory mechanisms underlying the distinctive programming of osteoblasts and chondrocytes are not well understood. Here, we perform an integrative analysis to investigate Runx2-DNA binding and chromatin accessibility ex vivo using neonatal osteoblasts and chondrocytes. We find that Runx2 engages with cell-type-distinct chromatin-accessible regions, potentially interacting with different combinations of transcriptional regulators, forming cell-type-specific hotspots, and potentiating chromatin accessibility. Genetic analysis and direct cellular reprogramming studies suggest that Runx2 is essential for establishment of chromatin accessibility in osteoblasts. Functional enhancer studies identify an Sp7 distal enhancer driven by Runx2-dependent binding and osteoblast-specific chromatin accessibility, contributing to normal osteoblast differentiation. Our findings provide a framework for understanding the regulatory landscape encompassing Runx2-mediated and cell-type-distinct enhancer networks that underlie the specification of osteoblasts.

Dominant Negative Mutants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viral Infectivity Factor (Vif) Disrupt Core-Binding Factor Beta-Vif Interaction.

Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing catalytic polypeptide-like 3 family members (APOBEC3s) are host restriction factors that inhibit viral replication. Viral infectivity factor (Vif), a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) accessory protein, mediates the degradation of APOBEC3s by forming the Vif-E3 complex, in which core-binding factor beta (CBFβ) is an essential molecular chaperone. Here, we screened nonfunctional Vif mutants with high affinity for CBFβ to inhibit HIV-1 in a dominant negative manner. We applied the yeast surface display technology to express Vif random mutant libraries, and mutants showing high CBFβ affinity were screened using flow cytometry. Most of the screened Vif mutants containing random mutations of different frequencies were able to rescue APOBEC3G (A3G). In the subsequent screening, three of the mutants restricted HIV-1, recovered G-to-A hypermutation, and rescued APOBEC3s. Among them, Vif-6M showed a cross-protection effect toward APOBEC3C, APOBEC3F, and African green monkey A3G. Stable expression of Vif-6M in T lymphocytes inhibited the viral replication in newly HIV-1-infected cells and the chronically infected cell line H9/HXB2. Furthermore, the expression of Vif-6M provided a survival advantage to T lymphocytes infected with HIV-1. These results suggest that dominant negative Vif mutants acting on the Vif-CBFβ target potently restrict HIV-1. IMPORTANCE Antiviral therapy cannot eliminate HIV and exhibits disadvantages such as drug resistance and toxicity. Therefore, novel strategies for inhibiting viral replication in patients with HIV are urgently needed. APOBEC3s in host cells are able to inhibit viral replication but are antagonized by HIV-1 Vif-mediated degradation. Therefore, we screened nonfunctional Vif mutants with high affinity for CBFβ to compete with the wild-type Vif (wtVif) as a potential strategy to assist with HIV-1 treatment. Most screened mutants rescued the expression of A3G in the presence of wtVif, especially Vif-6M, which could protect various APOBEC3s and improve the incorporation of A3G into HIV-1 particles. Transduction of Vif-6M into T lymphocytes inhibited the replication of the newly infected virus and the chronically infected virus. These data suggest that Vif mutants targeting the Vif-CBFβ interaction may be promising in the development of a new AIDS therapeutic strategy.

Decoupling the Transcriptional and Translational Roles of Core Binding Factor Beta to Identify Novel Therapeutic Targets in Osteosarcoma

Core binding factor beta (CBFβ) functions as a binding partner to the RUNX family of DNA binding transcription factors (RUNX1‐3) and acts as a transcriptional co‐activator by allosterically increasing their DNA binding. According to The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) and Genotype‐Tissue Expression (GTEx) datasets, high CBFβ expression is correlated with poor disease‐free and overall survival across 17 cancer types, including sarcomas. Of particular interest to osteosarcoma (OS) research is the interaction of CBFβ with RUNX2, the master regulator of bone growth and differentiation, also dysregulated in aggressive OS and implicated in chemoresistance. Recent research supports a non‐canonical role of CBFβ as a regulator of protein translation initiation. In breast cancer cells, this translation‐associated activity occurs via interactions with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNPK) and allows CBFβ to influence translation of hundreds of mRNA transcripts. Binding of CBFβ to hnRNPK or RUNX1 appears mutually exclusive, suggesting possible competition between these two roles.We hypothesized that CBFβ plays a role in the translation of RUNX2 and RUNX2‐target gene mRNAs in OS and that disruption of this role may result in an antitumor effect. The intertwined nature of the two roles of CBFβ hampers study of each in OS. Thus, we aimed to decouple them to identify which presents the most viable therapeutic target in OS.Using CRISPR/Cas9 we generated a CBFβ knockout (KO) U2OS cell line and evaluated RUNX2 protein and mRNA levels via western blot (WB) and qRT‐PCR, respectively. Cycloheximide chase assay and proteasome inhibition were used to evaluate RUNX2 stability and degradation, respectively. Interactions between CBFβ and RUNX2 or hnRNPK were assessed via co‐immunoprecipitation. Site‐directed mutagenesis (SDM) of CBFβ and transfection of U2OS CBFβ KO cells with FLAG tagged CBFβ mutants was used to prevent RUNX2‐CBFβ interaction. WB was used to evaluate changes in subcellular CBFβ localization. Global, as well as protein‐specific, changes in de novo protein synthesis were evaluated using the Click‐IT system. Finally, in silico modeling was used to design a peptide that mimics a 10 amino acid sequence on RUNX2 in the CBFβ binding interface, which was then evaluated in vitro using a recombinant RUNX2‐CBFβ pulldown assay.Our results demonstrate that loss of CBFβ leads to reduced RUNX2 protein expression without changes in RUNX2 mRNA levels. RUNX2 protein half‐life is not reduced in CBFβ nor does proteasome inhibition rescue RUNX2 protein levels. CBFβ interacts with hnRNPK in OS cells, and through this binding may perform a role in oncoprotein translation in OS, specifically modulating protein levels of RUNX2. SDM of CBFβ identified important residues for RUNX2 binding, which when targeted via a peptide resulted in a nearly 50% reduction in CBFβ and RUNX2 interaction. Ribosome footprinting combined with RNAseq and immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry utilizing WT U2OS, CBFβ mutants and peptide‐inhibited cells will provide further information on the translational role of CBFβ and potential therapeutic targets in OS.

MiR-153-3p inhibited osteogenic differentiation of human DPSCs through CBFβ signaling.

Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) have multilineage differentiation potential and especially show a great foreground in bone regeneration engineering. The mechanism of osteogenic differentiation of DPSCs needs to be explored exactly. As a kind of endogenous and non-coding small RNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in many biological processes including osteogenic differentiation. However, the mechanism of miR-153-3p in osteogenic differentiation of DPSCs is still unknown. Core-binding factors-beta (CBFβ) is a non-DNA-binding factor that combines with the runt-related transcription factor family transcription factors to mediate their DNA-binding affinities, and plays a critical role in regulating osteogenic differentiation. In this study, we explored the mechanisms of miR-153-3p and CBFβ in DPSC osteogenesis. The expression of miR-153-3p and CBFβ was tested under the osteogenic condition, and the influence led by changing the expression of miR-153-3p or CBFβ had also been detected. A luciferase reporter assay confirmed that miR-153-3p directly targeted to CBFβ. The osteogenic markers, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), were tested in protein level or mRNA level. ALP and Alizarin red staining were used to detect the osteoblast activity and mineral deposition. In osteogenic condition, the expressions of CBFβ and osteogenic markers were upregulated, whereas that of miR-153-3p was downregulated. miR-153-3p negatively regulated the osteogenic differentiation, and overexpression of CBFβ could offset the negative effect of miR-153-3p. Our findings provided a novel strategy for DPSC application in treatment of bone deficiencies and facilitated bone regeneration.

Core-binding factor beta is required for osteoblast differentiation during fibula fracture healing

BackgroundGrowing evidence has implicated core-binding factor beta (Cbfb) as a contributor to osteoblast differentiation, which plays a key role in fracture healing. Herein, we aimed to assess whether Cbfb affects osteoblast differentiation after fibula fracture.MethodsInitially, we established a Cbfb conditional knockout mouse model for subsequent studies. Immunohistochemical staining was conducted to detect the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and collagen II in the fracture end. Next, we isolated and cultured osteoblasts from specific Cbfb conditional knockout mice for BrdU analysis, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, and von Kossa staining to detect osteoblast viability, differentiation, and mineralization, respectively. Western blot analysis and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) were used to detect the expression of osteoblast differentiation-related genes.ResultsThe Cbfb conditional knockout mice exhibited downregulated expression of PCNA and collagen II, reduced ALP activity, and mineralization, as well as diminished expression of osteoblast differentiation-related genes. Further, Cbfb knockout exerted no obvious effects on osteoblast proliferation.ConclusionsOverall, these results substantiated that Cbfb could promote fibula fracture healing and osteoblast differentiation and thus provided a promising therapeutic target for clinical treatment of fibula fracture.

The p53/miR-145a Axis Promotes Cellular Senescence and Inhibits Osteogenic Differentiation by Targeting Cbfb in Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

The osteogenic differentiation capacity of senescent bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is reduced. p53 not only regulates cellular senescence but also functions as a negative regulator in bone formation. However, the role of p53 in MSCs senescence and differentiation has not been extensively explored. In the present study, we investigated the molecular mechanism of p53 in MSCs senescence and osteogenic differentiation. We found that p53 was upregulated during cellular senescence and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs respectively induced by H2O2 and BMP9. Similarly, the expression of p53-induced miR-145a was increased significantly. Furthermore, Overexpression of miR-145a in MSCs promoted cellular senescence and inhibited osteogenic differentiation. Then, we identified that p53-induced miR-145a inhibited osteogenic differentiation by targeting core binding factor beta (Cbfb), and the restoration of Cbfb expression rescued the inhibitory effects of miRNA-145a. In summary, our results indicate that p53/miR-145a axis exert its functions both in promoting senescence and inhibiting osteogenesis of MSCs, and the novel p53/miR-145a/Cbfb axis in osteogenic differentiation of MSCs may represent new targets in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Characterization of an A3G-VifHIV-1-CRL5-CBFβ Structure Using a Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry Pipeline for Integrative Modeling of Host–Pathogen Complexes

Structural analysis of host–pathogen protein complexes remains challenging, largely due to their structural heterogeneity. Here, we describe a pipeline for the structural characterization of these complexes using integrative structure modeling based on chemical cross-links and residue–protein contacts inferred from mutagenesis studies. We used this approach on the HIV-1 Vif protein bound to restriction factor APOBEC3G (A3G), the Cullin-5 E3 ring ligase (CRL5), and the cellular transcription factor Core Binding Factor Beta (CBFβ) to determine the structure of the (A3G-Vif-CRL5-CBFβ) complex. Using the MS-cleavable DSSO cross-linker to obtain a set of 132 cross-links within this reconstituted complex along with the atomic structures of the subunits and mutagenesis data, we computed an integrative structure model of the heptameric A3G-Vif-CRL5-CBFβ complex. The structure, which was validated using a series of tests, reveals that A3G is bound to Vif mostly through its N-terminal domain. Moreover, the model ensemble quantifies the dynamic heterogeneity of the A3G C-terminal domain and Cul5 positions. Finally, the model was used to rationalize previous structural, mutagenesis and functional data not used for modeling, including information related to the A3G-bound and unbound structures as well as mapping functional mutations to the A3G-Vif interface. The experimental and computational approach described here is generally applicable to other challenging host–pathogen protein complexes.

Allosteric interference in oncogenic FLI1 and ERG transactions by mithramycins

ETS family transcription factors of ERG and FLI1 play a key role in oncogenesis of prostate cancer and Ewing sarcoma by binding regulatory DNA sites and interfering with function of other factors. Mithramycin (MTM) is an anti-cancer, DNA binding natural product that functions as a potent antagonist of ERG and FLI1 by an unknown mechanism. We present a series of crystal structures of the DNA binding domain (DBD) of ERG/FLI1 culminating in a structure of a high-order complex of the ERG/FLI1 DBD, transcription factor Runx2, core-binding factor beta (Cbfβ), and MTM on a DNA enhancer site, along with supporting DNA binding studies using MTM and its analogues. Taken together, these data provide insight into allosteric mechanisms underlying ERG and FLI1 transactions and their disruption by MTM analogues.

Inhibition of Vif-Mediated Degradation of APOBEC3G through Competitive Binding of Core-Binding Factor Beta

Vif counteracts the host restriction factor APOBEC3G (A3G) and other APOBEC3s by preventing the incorporation of A3G into progeny virions. We previously identified Vif mutants with a dominant-negative (D/N) phenotype that interfered with the function of wild-type Vif, inhibited the degradation of A3G, and reduced the infectivity of viral particles by increased packaging of A3G. However, the mechanism of interference remained unclear, in particular since all D/N Vif mutants were unable to bind Cul5 and some mutants additionally failed to bind A3G, ruling out competitive binding to A3G or the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex as the sole mechanism. The goal of the current study was to revisit the mechanism of D/N interference by Vif mutants and analyze the possible involvement of core binding factor beta (CBFβ) in this process. We found a clear correlation of D/N properties of Vif mutants with their ability to engage CBFβ. Only mutants that retained the ability to bind CBFβ exhibited the D/N phenotype. Competition studies revealed that D/N Vif mutants directly interfered with the association of CBFβ and wild-type Vif. Furthermore, overexpression of CBFβ counteracted the interference of D/N Vif mutants with A3G degradation by wild-type Vif. Finally, overexpression of Runx1 mimicked the effect of D/N Vif mutants and inhibited the degradation of A3G by wild-type Vif. Taken together, we identified CBFβ as the key player involved in D/N interference by Vif.IMPORTANCE Of all the accessory proteins encoded by HIV-1 and other primate lentiviruses, Vif has arguably the strongest potential as a target for antiviral therapy. This conclusion is based on the observation that replication of HIV-1 in vivo is critically dependent on Vif. Thus, inhibiting the function of Vif via small-molecule inhibitors or other approaches has significant therapeutic potential. We previously identified dominant-negative (D/N) Vif variants whose expression interferes with the function of virus-encoded wild-type Vif. We now show that D/N interference involves competitive binding of D/N Vif variants to the transcriptional cofactor core binding factor beta (CBFβ), which is expressed in cells in limiting quantities. Overexpression of CBFβ neutralized the D/N phenotype of Vif. In contrast, overexpression of Runx1, a cellular binding partner of CBFβ, phenocopied the D/N Vif phenotype by sequestering endogenous CBFβ. Thus, our results provide proof of principle that D/N Vif variants could have therapeutic potential.

Structural basis of antagonism of human APOBEC3F by HIV-1 Vif.

HIV-1 Vif promotes degradation of the antiviral APOBEC3 (A3) proteins through the host ubiquitin-proteasome pathway to enable viral immune evasion. Disrupting Vif-A3 interactions to reinstate the A3-catalyzed suppression of HIV-1 replication is a potential approach for antiviral therapeutics. However, the molecular mechanisms by which Vif recognizes A3 proteins remain elusive. Here we report a cryo-EM structure of the Vif-targeted C-terminal domain of human A3F in complex with HIV-1 Vif and its cellular cofactor CBFβ, at 3.9 Å resolution. The structure shows that Vif and CBFβ form a platform to recruit A3F, revealing a direct A3F-recruiting role of CBFβ beyond Vif stabilization, and captures multiple independent A3F-Vif interfaces. Together with our biochemical and cellular studies, our structural findings establish the molecular determinants that are critical for Vif-mediated neutralization of A3F and provide a comprehensive framework of how HIV-1 Vif hijacks the host protein degradation machinery to counteract viral restriction by A3F.

The interaction between RUNX2 and core binding factor beta as a potential therapeutic target in canine osteosarcoma.

Osteosarcoma remains the most common primary bone tumour in dogs with half of affected dogs unable to survive 1 year beyond diagnosis. New therapeutic options are needed to improve outcomes for this disease. Recent investigations into potential therapeutic targets have focused on cell surface molecules with little clear therapeutic benefit. Transcription factors and protein interactions represent underdeveloped areas of therapeutic drug development. We have utilized allosteric inhibitors of the core binding factor transcriptional complex, comprised of core binding factor beta (CBFβ) and RUNX2, in four canine osteosarcoma cell lines Active inhibitor compounds demonstrate anti-tumour activities with concentrations demonstrated to be achievable in vivo while an inactive, structural analogue has no activity. We show that CBFβ inhibitors are capable of inducing apoptosis, inhibiting clonogenic cell growth, altering cell cycle progression and impeding migration and invasion in a cell line-dependent manner. These effects coincide with a reduced interaction between RUNX2 and CBFβ and alterations in expression of RUNX2 target genes. We also show that addition of CBFβ inhibitors to the commonly used cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs doxorubicin and carboplatin leads to additive and/or synergistic anti-proliferative effects in canine osteosarcoma cell lines. Taken together, we have identified the interaction between components of the core binding factor transcriptional complex, RUNX2 and CBFβ, as a potential novel therapeutic target in canine osteosarcoma and provide justification for further investigations into the anti-tumour activities we describe here.

HDAC1 Is a Required Cofactor of CBFβ-SMMHC and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Inversion 16 Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a neoplastic disease characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation and accumulation of immature myeloid cells. A common mutation in AML is the inversion of chromosome 16 [inv (16)], which generates a fusion between the genes for core binding factor beta (CBFB) and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain gene (MYH11), forming the oncogene CBFB-MYH11. The expressed protein, CBFβ-SMMHC, forms a heterodimer with the key hematopoietic transcription factor RUNX1. Although CBFβ-SMMHC was previously thought to dominantly repress RUNX1, recent work suggests that CBFβ-SMMHC functions together with RUNX1 to activate transcription of specific target genes. However, the mechanism of this activity or a requirement for additional cofactors is not known. Here, we show that the epigenetic regulator histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) forms a complex with CBFβ-SMMHC, colocalizes with RUNX1 and CBFβ-SMMHC on the promoters of known fusion protein target genes, and that Hdac1 is required for expression of these genes. These results imply that HDAC1 is an important component of the CBFβ-SMMHC transcriptional complex, and that leukemia cells expressing the fusion protein may be sensitive to treatment with HDAC1 inhibitors. Using a knock-in mouse model expressing CBFβ-SMMHC, we found that in vivo treatment with the HDAC1 inhibitor entinostat decreased leukemic burden, and induced differentiation and apoptosis of leukemia cells. Together, these results demonstrate that HDAC1 is an important cofactor of CBFβ-SMMHC and a potential therapeutic target in inv (16) AML. IMPLICATIONS: This report describes a novel role for HDAC1 as a cofactor for the leukemogenic fusion protein CBFβ-SMMHC and shows that inhibitors of HDAC1 effectively target leukemia cells expressing the fusion protein in vivo.

Clues for two-step virion infectivity factor regulation by core binding factor beta.

Lentiviruses threaten human and animal health. Virion infectivity factor (Vif) is essential for the infectivity of most lentiviruses, except for the equine infectious anaemia virus (EIAV). Vif promotes viral infectivity by recruiting a Cullin-based E3 ligase to induce the degradation of a class of host restriction factors, named APOBEC3. Core binding factor beta (CBF-β) is necessary for several primate lentiviral Vif functions, including HIV-1 Vif. Although much progress has been made in understanding the contribution of CBF-β to Vif function, the precise mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, we found that an interaction with CBF-β altered the oligomerization and subcellular distribution pattern and increased the stability of two primate lentiviral Vifs, HIV-1 Vif and Macaca simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac) Vif. Moreover, using a CBF-β loss-of-function mutant, we demonstrated that the interaction between CBF-β and Vif was not sufficient for Vif assistance; a region including F68 in CBF-β was also required for the stability and function of Vif. For the first time, this study separates the binding and regulating processes of CBF-β when it is promoting Vif function, which further extends our understanding of the biochemical regulation of Vif by CBF-β.

Alveolar Macrophages Prevent Lethal Influenza Pneumonia By Inhibiting Infection Of Type-1 Alveolar Epithelial Cells.

The Influenza A virus (IAV) is a major human pathogen that produces significant morbidity and mortality. To explore the contribution of alveolar macrophages (AlvMΦs) in regulating the severity of IAV infection we employed a murine model in which the Core Binding Factor Beta gene is conditionally disrupted in myeloid cells. These mice exhibit a selective deficiency in AlvMΦs. Following IAV infection these AlvMΦ deficient mice developed severe diffuse alveolar damage, lethal respiratory compromise, and consequent lethality. Lethal injury in these mice resulted from increased infection of their Type-1 Alveolar Epithelial Cells (T1AECs) and the subsequent elimination of the infected T1AECs by the adaptive immune T cell response. Further analysis indicated AlvMΦ-mediated suppression of the cysteinyl leukotriene (cysLT) pathway genes in T1AECs in vivo and in vitro. Inhibition of the cysLT pathway enzymes in a T1AECs cell line reduced the susceptibility of T1AECs to IAV infection, suggesting that AlvMΦ-mediated suppression of this pathway contributes to the resistance of T1AECs to IAV infection. Furthermore, inhibition of the cysLT pathway enzymes, as well as blockade of the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors in the AlvMΦ deficient mice reduced the susceptibility of their T1AECs to IAV infection and protected these mice from lethal infection. These results suggest that AlvMΦs may utilize a previously unappreciated mechanism to protect T1AECs against IAV infection, and thereby reduce the severity of infection. The findings further suggest that the cysLT pathway and the receptors for cysLT metabolites represent potential therapeutic targets in severe IAV infection.

HDAC1 Cooperates with CBFβ-SMMHC in Regulating Gene Expression in Inversion 16 Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The fusion of the genes for core binding factor beta and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (CBFB-MYH11) is the recurrent mutation found in inversion 16 (inv(16)) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The expressed fusion protein, CBFβ-SMMHC, binds to the transcriptional regulator RUNX1, and this interaction is required for leukemogenesis. Recent data shows CBFβ-SMMHC and RUNX1 are associated with promoters of both transcribed and repressed genes, implying that the CBFβ-SMMHC:RUNX1 complex directly regulates target gene expression. However, it is not known whether other transcriptional co-factors are also required for this activity.Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) removes acetyl groups from histone tails to regulate the accessibility of chromatin to transcriptional machinery. It is recruited to chromatin by transcription factors, including RUNX1. HDAC1 also colocalizes with RUNX1 and CBFβ-SMMHC to promoter regions in ME-1 cells, a human inv(16) cell line. Based on this, we hypothesized that HDAC1 could bind to the RUNX1: CBFβ-SMMHC complex and plays a role in transcriptional regulation in inv(16).To test if CBFβ-SMMHC and HDAC1 form a complex, we transfected COS-7 cells with expression plasmids for HDAC1-FLAG and CBFβ-SMMHC and performed immunoprecipitations (IP) with nuclear extracts. IP with anti-MYH11 showed an interaction between HDAC1 and CBFβ-SMMHC, as did IP with anti-FLAG. Importantly, we found that HDAC1 and CBFβ-SMMHC co-immunoprecipitate in mouse leukemia cells from our knockin model which expresses CBFβ-SMMHC from the endogenous CBFβ promoter (CBFβ-SMMHC+). Confirming the specificity of this interaction, we found that IP with anti-MYH11 in ME-1 cells shows HDAC1 interaction, but the same IP in the t(8;21) AML cell line Kasumi-1 did not show HDAC1 interaction even though similar levels of HDAC1 are expressed.We next tested whether RUNX1 mediates the interaction between CBFβ-SMMHC and HDAC1. We performed IP experiments using a CBFβ-SMMHC mutant lacking RUNX1 binding (CBFβ-SMMHCN63K,N104K,Δ179-221). This mutant was co-immunoprecipitated with HDAC1, but not RUNX1, indicating that CBFβ-SMMHC’s interaction with HDAC1 does not require RUNX1. We tested a construct lacking the c-terminal 95 amino acids, CBFβ-SMMHCΔC95, the domain known to interact with the related protein, HDAC8. We found that HDAC1 immunoprecipitated with CBFβ-SMMHCΔC95, suggesting that HDAC1 binds to a unique region of CBFβ-SMMHC.To test if HDAC1 plays a role in CBFβ-SMMHC-mediated gene expression, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitations on mouse CBFβ-SMMHC+ primary leukemia cells with antibodies against HDAC1, RUNX1, and MYH11, followed by real-time PCR for the promoter regions of three CBFβ-SMMHC target genes: MPO, CSF1R, and CEBPD. We observed all three proteins enriched on the target gene promoters as compared to immunoglobulin controls. This indicates that HDAC1 localizes with CBFβ-SMMHC and RUNX1 on target gene promoters in mouse primary leukemia cells. To test if HDAC1 is required for expression of these target genes, we used shRNA to knockdown Hdac1 expression. Mouse CBFβ-SMMHC+ leukemia cells were transduced with one of 2 different shRNAs against Hdac1 or with a control construct. We found that expression of all three genes was decreased with Hdac1knockdown, implying that HDAC1 is required for CBFβ-SMMHC induced changes in gene expression. These results also suggest that HDAC1 may have a role in transcriptional activation for certain genes, which is in contrast to its traditional role as a transcriptional repressor.These findings imply that HDAC1 activity is required for the maintenance of CBFβ-SMMHC expressing leukemia cells, and that HDAC1 inhibitors may be effective against inv(16) AML. To test this possibility we performed colony-forming assays using mouse leukemia cells grown in the presence of two different HDAC inhibitors, entinostat which is specific for HDAC1, and vorinostat, a nonspecific HDAC inhibitor. Our preliminary results indicate that both entinostat and vorinostat reduce the ability of primary CBFβ-SMMHC+ mouse leukemia cells to form colonies as compared to the vehicle control, while having minimal effects on growth of normal hematopoietic cells. In summary, we demonstrated that HDAC1 forms a complex with CBFβ-SMMHC and is required for its regulation of target gene expression, and that HDAC inhibitors may be effective for the treatment of inv(16) AML patients. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

TAFII250 Is Critical in AML1-ETO Mediated Leukemogenesis

Background: Rearrangement between chromosome 8 and 21 is the most frequently observed chromosomal translocation. In AML patients, it leads to the formation of a novel fusion protein AML1-ETO. AML1-ETO functions as a transcriptional regulator to suppress myeloid differentiation and to promote self-renewal of hematopoiesis stem cells, which are of importance in leukemia development. However, AML1-ETO has no enzymatic function, thus targeting AML1-ETO directly is technically difficult. TAFII250, a largest subunit of the transcription factor IID complex (TFIID) serves to bring other components of basal transcription machinery to the preinitiation complex during the transcription initiation. And TAFII250 also plays a crucial role in the expression of genes involved in cell cycle and apoptosis. Yet despite the importance of these processes, there is no direct evidence implicating TAFII250 in cancer development. We have reported that acetylation of AML1-ETO on lysine 43 is critical for AML1-ETO mediated leukemogenesis and used a peptide pulldown strategy to identify proteins that preferring interact with acetylated AML1-ETO and identified TAFII250. Here, we are going to report the functions of TAFII250 in AML1-ETO induced leukemogenesis.Methods: We used Kasumi-1 and SKNO-1 cell lines derived from t(8; 21)AML patients, and a mouse AML1-ETO exon 9a (AE9a) expressing cell line developed from bone marrow cells of mice injected with bone marrow cells infected with AE9a to perform in vitro and in vivo studies.Results: We demonstrate that TAFII250 associates with AML1-ETO in AML cells through its bromodomain recognizing acetylated lysine 43 on AML1-ETO. The knockdown of TAFII250 completely abolished the proliferation of AML1-ETO expressing cells and has little influence on cell growth of non AML1-ETO expressing cells K562 and CD34+ cells. In addition, when we examined cleaved caspase 3 and PARP by western and measured annexin-V through flow cytometry, we found that the deficiency of TAFII250 induces apoptosis in AML1-ETO expressing cells. Further, the co-immunoprecipitation assay revealed that the deficiency of TAFII250 blocks the binding of AML1-ETO to CBFb (core binding factor beta subunit) and the recruitment of AML1-ETO at the promoter regions of a subset of its target genes. Consequently, loss of TAFII250 interferes with the expression of these genes. The depletion of TAFII250 also has negative effect on the self-renewal of leukemic cells, promoting their differentiation. Most importantly, the loss of TAFII250 severely impairs leukemia development in AE9a expressing cells.Conclusions: Together, these results reveal an essential role of TAFII250 in AML1-ETO mediated leukemogenesis and imply that TAFII250 might be a therapeutic target for AML1-ETO expressing AMLs. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.