Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Research Articles

Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictor of Prognosis In Patient with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction that Treated With Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor: A Prospective Cohort Study in Aceh,

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) and inflammation are related. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-I) and Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors (ARNI) can reduce inflammation by lowering neutrophil counts. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple marker of inflammation. There is a lack of studies showing that NLR can predict prognosis in patients with HFrEF, and further investigation is needed.Objectives: Investigating whether NLR could be a prognostic indicator for mortality and rehospitalization in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction receiving treatment with ACE-I or ARNI.Methods: A prospective observational cohort study with double-blind methods was conducted at Zainal Abidin General Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Two groups, ACE-I and ARNI, each comprised 40 participants. Initially, blood sampling was performed to determine NLR. Participants were observed weekly for three months for prognosis outcomes (death and rehospitalization). After three months, the remaining participants were invited for re-evaluation of the NLR.Results: This study found that pre-treatment NLR had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.454 (95% CI: 1.266-1.670, p < 0.001). The risk ratio of abnormal pre-treatment NLR for rehospitalization was 6.56 in the ACE-I group and 8.33 in the ARNI group. Nevertheless, both ACE-I (p = 0.014) and ARNI (p = 0.032) decreased NLR levels.Conclusions: High NLR could be as a predictor of prognosis in patients with heart failure with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction that treated with ACE-I or ARNI, also ACE-I and ARNI could reduce NLR levels.

Guideline-directed antihypertensive medication use among young adult participants with uncontrolled hypertension at enrollment in the MyHEART study.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for heart disease, heart failure and stroke. Lifestyle changes are recommended as first-line treatment for management of high blood pressure for young adults, when 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score is < 10%. If lifestyle changes alone do not control blood pressure, then providers have access to four classes of first-line blood pressure lowering agents to treat hypertension, when other contra-indications are not present. This is a cross-sectional, retrospective, secondary analysis performed of the MyHEART trial on study participants at enrollment to determine they were prescribed anti-hypertensive medication. Of those prescribed medications, we aimed to determine the frequency first-line medications including thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics, angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and calcium channel blockers were prescribed. This analysis categorized participants into four medication status categories: no antihypertensive medication, prescribed only first-line antihypertensives, prescribed only non-first-line antihypertensives, and prescribed a combination of first-line and non-first-line antihypertensives. Participant clinical and sociodemographic factors by medication use were evaluated. Linear regression models were fit to determine the association between antihypertensive medication and blood pressure. At enrollment, 157/311 (50.5%) participants were not on antihypertensives. Of the 154 on antihypertensives, reported use included monotherapy 97/154 (63.0%), combined therapy 57/154 (37.0%), only first-line antihypertensive 111/154 (72.0%), and only non-first-line antihypertensives 21/154 (13.6%), and combination of first-line and non-first-line antihypertensives 22/154 (14.2%). Antihypertension medication use varied based on age (p < 0.001), sex (p = 0.008), race (p = 0.001), body mass index (BMI) kg/m2 (p = 0.016), anxiety and/or depression (p = 0.048), diabetes (p = 0.007), and sodium intake (p = 0.042). Participants with only first-line medications had lower in-office systolic (-4.66 mmHg, CI -8.31 to -1.02, p = 0.013) and diastolic (-3.51 mmHg, CI -6.30 to -0.71, p = 0.015), and lower ambulatory diastolic (-2.12 mmHg, CI -4.15 to -0.09, p = 0.041) blood pressure than those without antihypertensives. Among MyHEART study participants, all of which had uncontrolled hypertension, 50.5% were not on an antihypertensive at enrollment. This finding supports the call to improve management of blood pressure earlier in life to potentially contribute to the reduction of long-term cardiovascular disease. Of the participants who were prescribed blood pressure medication, providers prescribed guideline-based antihypertensive therapy the majority of the time, however, this study indicates there may be an opportunity to increase the use of first-line, guideline-based antihypertensives, regardless of age, sex, or type of hypertension to lower long-term cardiovascular risk. https://www. gov Identifier: NCT03158051, registered 5-15-2017. IRB approval obtained: IRB # 2017 - 0372.

Abstract 4122247: Impact of serum chloride levels for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background: As previous reports of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) as a prognostic marker of mortality in heart failure (HF) patients included those with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, little is known about the risk factors of VA among patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), especially those without previous VA. The prognostic role of electrolyte abnormalities has been highlighted in HF patients. This study evaluated the impact of serum chloride levels for VA and all-cause death in patients with HF who underwent CRT without VA before CRT implantation. Methods: From the retrospective cohort of 397 HF patients (age 63+/-13, male 74%) who undergoing CRT implantation between 2010 and 2020, this study enrolled 175 patients (82% implanted CRT with a defibrillator) without a previous history of VA (sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) of ventricular fibrillation (VF)). We studied the impact of serum chloride levels before CRT implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as VA, VA with ICD therapy and sudden cardiac death. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results: During median follow-up of 35 months, 53 patients (30%) experienced VA. Patients with VA had a tendency toward high LVESV (172ml vs. 150ml, p&lt;0.09) and low left ventricular ejection fraction (26 vs. 29, p&lt;0.09), and significantly reduced rate of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (30% vs. 70%, p&lt;0.05) at the time of CRT implantation. The rate of CRT responders was significantly higher in patients without VA than with VA (59% vs. 40%, p&lt;0.05). The cut-off value of chloride for VA was determined to be 102mEq/l using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The patients with chloride ≤102mEq/l had significantly higher rates of VA (41% vs. 25%, log-rank p&lt;0.05) and mortality (33% vs. 18%, log-rank p&lt;0.05) (Figure). By multivariate cox analysis, the level of chloride had an independent predictive value of VA in patients with CRT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08 per 1mEq/l decrease, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.16, p&lt;0.05) (Table). Conclusions: The chloride level had a predictive value for VA after CRT implantation in HF patients without previous VA. The management of electrolytes, including chloride, might be important for preventing fatal arrhythmia in patients with HF undergoing CRT implantation.

Abstract 4131412: Effects of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition And Afterload Reduction in Single Ventricle Patients Prior To Fontan: Not What You Might Think

Introduction: Pts with single ventricle (SV) after bidirectional Glenn (BDG) are placed on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) to reduce afterload, improve ventricular performance and allow for decreased systemic to pulmonary collateral flow (APC). No large scale data exists to support ACEI use in BDG pts to accomplish this. We hypothesized that ACEI may not perform as predicted. Goals: To determine if ACEI use in BDG pts decreases APC and improves ventricular function. Methods: Single center retrospective study of all BDG pts who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) from 2010 to present. Demographics, medication, ventricular function and flow data were collected. Pts included were &gt;1 year old and on ACEI for &gt;3 months prior to CMR. Wilcoxon and Fisher Exact tests were used. Significance P&lt;0.05 Results: Of the 320 BDG pts (median 2.8 years old) studied, 137 (43%) were treated with ACEI. See table for all data. There was no difference in age, sex, medications (except for ACEI) or body surface area (BSA) between both groups. APC as a % of aortic flow and APC/BSA were not different between those treated with ACEI compared to those who were not, whether right (RV) or left ventricle (LV) dominant. There was no correlation of APC with time on ACEI or ACEI dosage. Ejection fraction (EF) was lower and end-diastolic volume (EDV) was higher in BDG on ACEI for the entire group and RVs. Although LV EDV was higher with those on ACEI, LV EF was the same for those on ACEI and those who weren’t (graph). APC as a % of aortic flow and APC/BSA positively correlated with EDV (rho 0.25-0.34, P&lt;.001). There was no difference in atrioventricular valve regurgitation between those on ACEI and those who were not (median 5 vs 6% respectively). As a surrogate for cerebral blood flow (CBF), superior vena caval (SVC) flow was lower for those on ACEI compared to those who were not. Conclusion: BDG pts treated with ACEI did not demonstrate decreased APC or improved ventricular performance. There is a suggestion that ventricular performance may be worse on ACEI. CBF is decreased in BDG on ACEI using SVC flow as a surrogate. This suggests that ACEI use in SV pts at the BDG stage is not indicated and should be discouraged.

Abstract 4138024: Identifying the Medications with the Greatest Reduction in Mortality in Coronary Artery Dissection

Introduction: Coronary artery dissection (CD) is a potentially fatal complication, usually arising either spontaneously or iatrogenically. Therefore, identifying treatment methods that reduce mortality is of great importance. The American College of Cardiology recommendations stipulate that patients who have experienced CD may benefit from beta-blocker therapy, as beta-blockers have been shown to reduce the incidence of recurrent CD. Currently, there is little published data in support of beta-blockers providing mortality reduction for CD. Given the significant risk of mortality from CD, we aimed to test the veracity of these recommendations using a retrospective multicenter study as well as having a main objective of exploring means to lower mortality in CD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort that identified 2,104 patients diagnosed with CD. We extracted the data from across 16 West Florida hospitals in between the years of 2017-2022. Our patients were identified and stratified based on common lab values and cardioprotective medications they were taking. Chi-square and binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for mortality. The odds ratio estimate for mortality was our primary outcome with attention given to factors that were associated with an increased or decreased likelihood of mortality in patients with CD. Results: Patients on beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) were the only variables that were statistically significant. Out of 2,104 patients, 1,562 patients were on beta-blockers (74.2%), and 921 were on an ACEi/ARB (43.8%). Our data revealed that the odds ratio for mortality in patients with CD while on beta blockers was 0.375 (p-value 0.0009, confidence interval 0.210-0.669), and while on ACEi/ARBs was 0.447 (p-value 0.0077, confidence interval 0.247-0.808). These results indicate a significant reduction in mortality in patients who are taking beta-blockers and/or ACEi/ARB medications after being diagnosed with CD. Conclusion: Our data can be viewed as supportive of the current recommendation for the primary use of beta-blockers in patients with spontaneous CD, as well as suggesting angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as possible additional therapies

Clinical profiles and shortterm outcomes of women with peripartum and dilated cardiomyopathies

Background: We aimed to compare the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, rate of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), heart failure hospitalization and allcause mortality of women with peripartum and dilated cardiomyopathies (PPCM and DCM respectively) in Nigeria. Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal study and a total of 130 patients (65 for each group) were recruited consecutively and followed up for 6 months. Results: PPCM patients were younger, but the DCM patients had higher frequency of atrial fibrillation and complete left bundle branch block, higher mean left atrial and LV dimensions, higher LV filling pressures, and worse renal dysfunction, respectively, at baseline. At the end of the 6month followup, 15 female DCM vs 21 PPCM patients (p=0.684) had achieved LVRR, 13 DCM vs 11 PPCM patients (p=0.098) were hospitalized for heart failure, and 10 DCM vs 5 PPCM patients (p=0.098) had died. The odds for achieving LVRR was independently increased by systolic blood pressure (SBP) &gt;100 mmHg and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion &gt;16 mm at baseline in PPCM patients, and by use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors at baseline in female DCM patients. The odds for mortality were increased by tachycardia and pericardial effusion and reduced by the use of loop diuretics at baseline in DCM patients, and SBP &lt;90 mmHg at baseline increased it by 9fold in PPCM patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest that women with DCM and PPCM differ significantly in their demographic and clinical characteristics, and predictors of clinical outcomes.

Impact of Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on response to PD1/L1 inhibitors in patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundThe renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), traditionally associated with blood pressure and fluid regulation, also plays a role in tumorigenesis. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASI), including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), have been shown to improve outcomes in various malignant neoplasms. In metastatic urothelial cancer, the use of RAASI have been associated with higher rates of tumor regression in patients receiving immunotherapy (IO) with PD1/L1 inhibitors. This is thought to be due to RAASI-induced downregulation of TGF-beta, for which increased expression is a known mechanism of PD1/L1 inhibitor resistance. We hypothesized that concurrent RAASI in patients with mRCC receiving IO is associated with increased tumor regression. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC receiving IO as a first- or second-line therapy from 2016-2023 at the University of Virginia. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the impact of concurrent RAASI on tumor regression. The primary endpoint was any regression of tumor on imaging. ResultsData were available for 128 patients with mRCC who received IO as a first- (n=91, 71.0%) or second- (n=37, 28.9%) line treatment. Patients who received RAASI during IO were more likely to have tumor regression compared to patients who were not on concurrent RAASI (OR 3.84 [95% CI 1.81-8.47, p=<0.001). This held true regardless if patients received IO as a first-line (OR 2.83 [95% CI 1.2-6.94], p=0.0173) or second-line (OR 9.5 [95% CI 1.89-73.1], p=0.005) treatment. ConclusionsOur hypothesis generating study suggests that in our mRCC population, concurrent use of RAASI in patients receiving IO was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of tumor regression. These findings highlight the potential therapeutic advantage of RAASI in combination with IO for mRCC patients. Further exploration of this association is warranted in prospective studies to improve treatment outcomes for this patient population. MicroAbstractRenin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASI) have been shown to improve outcomes in various malignancies. In this retrospective, single-center study, we found that concurrent use of RAASI in patients with mRCC receiving IO is associated with a significantly increased likelihood of tumor regression. Our findings suggest the potential therapeutic advantage of RAASI in combination with IO for mRCC patients.

Significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patient with arterial hypertension during antihypertensive treatment with perindopril and atorvastatin

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular events and serves as a justified goal for antihypertensive therapy. The article presents follow-up of a 60-year-old female with AH, hyperlipidemia, and discovered of LVH on the data of electrocardiography and echocardiography. In addition to the SokolowLyon and Cornell voltage criteria, the baseline echocardiographic examination revealed and increase in thickness of the ventricular septum and the left ventricular (LV) posterior wall, an increase in LV myocardial mass and LV myocardial mass index. The patient was recommended to take a drug of the class of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors perindopril and atorvastatin. The patient regularly received therapy and periodically underwent repeated echocardiographic examinations. After 40 months follow-up there are a significant decrease in septal hypertrophy (from 1.22 to 0.76 cm, -37.7%), LV posterior wall (from 1.05 to 0.49, -53.3%), as well as LV myocardial mass (from 197.9 to 96 g, -51.5%) and LV myocardial mass index (from 111.18 to 59.11 g/ m2, -51.5%). Thus, during the entire period of follow-up, the LV mass decreased almost twice. There was a decrease in the size of the left atrium, the relative wall thickness, with the same parameters of LV volumes, characteristics of systolic and diastolic function. Among the favorable factors contributing to significant LVH regression, high adherence to treatment, the efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and the possible antihypertrophic influence of atorvastatin are discussed.

The role of beta blockers in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases

Beta-blockers are used to treat various cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and chronic heart failure. They act by suppressing the effects of catecholamines through various pathways and affect heart rate, strength, and renin release, providing antihypertensive and anti-ischemic effects. The individual effects of various drugs on clinical outcomes in this group were determined according to characteristics of the patient, underlying disease, and type of beta-blocker used. In recent years, beta-blockers have faced a serious obstacle when new guidelines on hypertension suggest their use as second-line therapy after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and slow calcium channel blockers in the absence of clear indications. In fact, these recommendations were based on meta-analyses that showed that beta-blockers have fewer beneficial effects on overall mortality, cardiovascular events, and brain stroke. In addition, according to currently available data, the appointment of beta-blockers for diseases such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and stable coronary heart disease can cause more harm than good outcomes. Bisoprolol is a beta-blocker with the highest selectivity for beta1-adrenergic receptors, which determines the rare frequency of side effects that develop because of its use. This review presents current data on the use of beta-blockers for treating cardiovascular diseases, with an emphasis on the use of bisoprolol.

5-year valve academic research consortium-3 outcomes and predictors of mortality in a 10-year Asian transcatheter aortic valve implantation registry

Abstract Background Transaortic valvular implantation (TAVI) has revolutionised the management of aortic stenosis (AS). Uptake in Asia has caught up in recent years, after an initial lag due to expensive cost, limited subsidies, and scarce accessibility. Hence, longitudinal outcomes of TAVI remain largely unknown in Asian patients. Purpose This study aims to present the 5-year mortality endpoints in an Asian cohort followed up over a decade. Methods 253 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis status post TAVI were retrospectively enrolled at a tertiary academic hospital from 2010-2021. The main outcomes were defined as short-term (30-day), mid-term (1-year) and long-term (5-year) all-cause mortality. Baseline demographics, procedural findings and clinical outcomes were analysed. Kaplan-Meier curves and multiple Cox regression analyses were constructed. Results The mean age was 75.2 + 10.2 years. 120 (47.4%) patients were female and 167 (66%) were Chinese. 168 patients (66.7%) received balloon-expandable valves, 80 patients (31.7%) underwent self-expandable valves, and 4 patients (1.6%) had mechanical-expandable valves. Malignancy was associated with worse short-term mortality at 30-days (HR 3.65, p = 0.054), while pulmonary disease and previous stroke were associated with worse long-term mortality at 5-years (HR 2.27, p = 0.012 and HR 2.02, p = 0.064). Worse all-cause mortality at 30-days, 1-year and 5-years were associated with high NT-Pro BNP levels (HR 1.04, p = 0.046; HR 1.05, p = 0.002 and HR 1.04, p &amp;lt; 0.001), the presence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (HR 4.32, p = 0.056; HR 4.48, p = 0.006 and HR 2.43, p = 0.023) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (HR 6.19, p = 0.006; HR 6.77, p &amp;lt; 0.001 and HR 2.09, p = 0.008). Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score (HR 1.11, p = 0.001; HR 1.13, p &amp;lt; 0.001 and HR 1.12, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) III endpoints of acute kidney injury (AKI) (HR 6.68, p = 0.047, HR 10.8, p &amp;lt; 0.001 and HR 6.99, p &amp;lt; 0.001), cardiogenic shock (HR 26.3, p &amp;lt; 0.001, HR 12.0, p &amp;lt; 0.001 and HR 4.29, p = 0.011) and structural complications (HR 40.3, p &amp;lt; 0.001, HR 18.1, p &amp;lt; 0.001 and HR 5.18, p = 0.008) were associated with worse all –cause mortality at time-points of 30-days, 1-year and 5-years respectively. On multivariate analyses adjusted for comorbidities and outcomes, STS score and structural complications were independent predictors of 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.16; p = 0.003, HR 1.09, p = 0.003 and HR 1.10, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and (HR 62.7, p &amp;lt; 0.007; HR 18.9, p &amp;lt; 0.001 and HR 10.6, p = 0.001) respectively. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use was protective of survival within 1-year (HR 0.37, p = 0.022). Conclusions STS score and VARC III endpoints of structural complications were reliable predictors of all-cause mortality in Asian patients with TAVI. ACE inhibitor and ARB use was protective against mortality at 1-year.Cox regression analysesKaplan-Meier curves

Long-term continuation to pharmacological treatment for secondary prevention after a myocardial infarction: a register study

Abstract Background Pharmacological treatment for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is crucial to prevent new events. Several studies report inconsistence and need for improvement of pharmacological treatment. Study follow-up is often less than 10 years and showing that continuation to drug treatment decreases with time. Objective To study long-term follow-up of nationally guideline recommended medical therapy (GDMT) for secondary prevention after a myocardial infarction. Method The study population consisted of individuals aged 18-84 years, who were hospitalized for a MI between January 2006 and December 2022 and were followed up to 16 years. The study subjects were identified through the National Inpatient Register and linked to the Prescribed Drug Register. Four classes of drugs were analyzed: antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, lowering therapy, betablockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Time-updated survival analyses were used to investigate the relationship between continuation of preventive pharmacological treatment and mortality and recurrent MI after an acute MI. Results A total number of 139 413 individuals (mean age 69.1±10.6) were included and 33.3% were female. At baseline 51.2% had hypertension, 21.5% diabetes mellitus and 15.2% heart failure. All prescriptions of GDMT were decreased significantly after hospitalization after MI and during first years and remained plateau (figure 1). During follow-up 55487 persons died (39.8%, event rate 5.81 per 100 person years [95% CI 5.76-5.86]). Medication with antiplatelets/anticoagulantia, ACEi/ARB and statins decreased risk of all cause-mortality and myocardial infarction [HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.79-0.86], p-value &amp;lt;0.001, HR 0,79 [95% CI 0.77-0.83], p-value &amp;lt;0.001, HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.67-0.73], p-value &amp;lt;0.001) respectively. Conclusion Pharmacological treatment as a part of secondary prevention remained greatly underutilized both shortly and during long-term after MI. Usage of antiplatelets or antigulantia, ACEi or ARB and statins decreased the risk of all-cause mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction.

Prognostic determinants in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction after a first hospitalisation for acute heart failure. COMFE registry

Abstract Introduction The clinical characteristics and determinants for prognosis of patients with a first hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF &amp;lt;40%) are poor described and show heterogeneous results that need major investigation. Purpose The aim of our study was to identify the clinical characteristics, prognosis and their main determinants in a prospective registry of patients with HF and reduced LVEF with a first hospital admission for acute heart failure, prognosis and their main determinants in a prospective registry in these patients. Methods We carried out a prospective registry in 2 University Hospitals of patients admitted to cardiology department due to first-time HF hospitalisation with reduced LVEF. 231 admitted consecutively between March 2021 and September 2022 were included, with a mean follow-up of 381 days. Continuous variables were represented as median (interquartile range) and categorical variables as percentage %. A multivariate logistic regression was performed in which age, sex, comorbidities, treatment, rhythm at discharge and improvement in LVEF were included; and using the Wald method, the predictors of rehospitalization and/or death were identified. Data were analysed using SPSS v. 25.0. Results The main baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The population had a median age of 71 years, 75% were men, with a high prevalence of arterial hypertension (HBP) (69%) and hyperlipidemia (57%). Quadruple therapy (Na-Glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor [SGLT2i], Beta-Blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA] and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI], angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEi] or Angiotensin-II receptor blocker [ARB]) was achieved in 57% at discharge. The dynamics of NTproBNP was studied from admission to completed up-titration, observing an average reduction of 37% and 32% met the criteria for improved LVEF after. The etiology is described in Figure 1a, with ischemic heart disease being the most represented (31%). Multivariate Cox regression for the combined event of readmission/death from any cause showed that treatment with SGLT2i (OR 0,48 [CI 95%: 0,23-0,98 p:0,04]) and Beta-Blocker (OR 0,35 [CI 95%: 0,14-0,87 p:0,02]) at discharge and improved LVEF (OR 0,33 [CI 95%: 0,15-0,72 p:0,006]) were protective predictors against the event; but diabetes mellitus (DM) was a predictor of a worse prognosis (OR 2,9 [CI 95%: 1,52-5,5 p:0,001]) Fig. 1b. Conclusions Patients with a first admission for HF with reduced LVEF constitute a heterogeneous clinical group. Improvement in LVEF after drug up-titration and treatment with SGLT2i and Beta-blocker are independently associated with a better prognosis. Our findings may have implications for their clinical management.Table 1Figure 1

What does routinely-collected electronic health record data tell us about the use of heart failure medication among older people in Wales? Making progress but could do better

Abstract Background European Society of Cardiology 2021 guidelines recommend 4 pillars of treatment to reduce mortality for those with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): pillar 1) angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), pillar 2) beta-blocker (BB), pillar 3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), pillar 4) sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). When there is heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), guidelines recommend diuretics to alleviate congestion and treatment of risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Prior to 2021, United Kingdom guidelines did not include SGLT2i. Purpose To examine how HF treatment is recorded in routinely-collected electronic health record (EHR) data for older people in Wales, and to explore how that has changed since 2015. Methods We conducted a retrospective, population-level, observational study using linked anonymised EHR data in Wales (2015-22). 737,230 individuals were aged 65y+ in the study period (21.5% of population in 2022). Of these, 65,010 had a code for heart failure in their primary or secondary care records. We excluded 13,990 individuals with fewer than 12 months data pre- or post-diagnosis. We looked forward, from HF diagnosis, for codes associated with specific medications. Results The final cohort comprised 51,020 individuals aged 65y and over with a diagnosis of heart failure between 2015-2022. Incidence and prevalence of heart failure increased across the study period (1.4-1.5% and 8.5-9.1% respectively). Preceding cardiovascular diagnoses included hypertension (69.5%), atrial fibrillation (36.7%), myocardial infarction (30.5%), coronary artery disease (25.7%), and valve disease (17.7%). Diabetes (41.7%), chronic kidney disease (30.9%) and cancer (26.4%) were the most common comorbidities. The subtype of HF (HFrEF or HFpEF) was only evident in 5,850. Treatments recorded most often were loop diuretics, ACE-I, and BB (Table 1). SGLT2i codes increased in 2020/2021(Figure 1). At 10-12 months post diagnosis, the proportion with simultaneous pillar combinations was; 27.4% 1 + 2, 12.5% 1, 2 + 3, and only 2% 1, 2, 3 + 4. Conclusions In Wales, there is a need to improve the coding of HF subtype in primary care records. We suggest interpreting data with the assumption that approximately half of the cohort are likely to have HFrEF. While the cohort proportion on ACE-I or beta-blockers may be appropriate, the proportion with more than 1 simultaneous pillar of treatment recorded appears low. The use of SGLT2i in codes is increasing. These results are important in evaluating health service delivery and in establishing baseline data from which to monitor improvements.

Sex-differences in prescription patterns of secondary prevention pharmacotherapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a 20-year perspective

Abstract Background Recent studies have demonstrated sex-related differences in secondary prevention pharmacotherapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), although guidelines recommend the same preventive approach in both women and men. Purpose This study extends earlier work by examining temporal trends of prescribing practices of secondary prevention medications using contemporary data from a long-term period in Switzerland, with particular regard to sex inequalities. Methods For the purpose of this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS) Plus registry, optimal medical therapy (OMT) was defined as the combination of all five guideline-recommended medications in AMI at discharge: aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, lipid-lowering drugs, beta blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 34'612 patients (men n=25’913, 75%) hospitalised with AMI between 2003 and 2022 were included in the analysis. The mean age was 66±13 years and women were on average 7 years older than men. Despite having more comorbidities, women benefited less frequently from OMT than men (51% vs. 60%) across all age groups (all p&amp;lt;0.001), with the greatest gap occurring in patients &amp;lt;50 years of age. Within the 20-year study period, significant increases over time were observed in the singular prescription of all OMT components, except for beta blockers (p=0.2). This translated into a marked increase in OMT prescription irrespective of age and sex (from 36% to 60%), mainly due to greater prescription of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, from 71% to 91%) and lipid-lowering drugs (LLD, from 69% to 93%). The sex-related gap in OMT disfavoring women showed a uctuating trend over the years (getting reduced from 14% in 2003 to 0.7% in 2016 to widen again to 12% in 2022) whereas there was a continuous narrowing over time regarding the combination of DAPT plus LLD, from 18% to 10% at the beginning and the end of the observation, respectively (Figure 1). In multivariable analysis, age (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.98-0.99, p&amp;lt;0.001) and female sex (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.85-0.95, p&amp;lt;0.001) were independent predictors of deficient OMT prescription, while the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention was identified as the strongest positive predictor favoring it (OR 4.85, 95%CI 4.49-5.24, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion Although there has been a gradual increase in the prescription of OMT over time among both women and men, concerning sex disparities disfavoring women, and particularly young women, remained. Targeted programs to reduce sex-related differences in secondary prevention care are warranted.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors : a potential cardioprotective agent?

Abstract Background Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are one of the cornerstones in the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF) , regardless the ejection fraction (EF) or the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). Other types of medications used in the treatment of heart failure , like angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or beta-blockers (BB) have shown some degree of cardioprotection in high risk patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy, but data on SGLT2i are very limited. Purpose To examine the possible differences in the development of anthracycline cardiotoxicity in diabetic patients receiving SGLT2i compared to those who don’t. Methods We retrospectively analysed the data from the oncological as well as hematological patients of our hospital. Group 1 (SGLT2) included patients with cancer who received anthracycline treatment and diabetes on treatment with SGLT2i. Group 2 (control) included patients with cancer who received anthracycline treatment and diabetes but with treatment other than SGLT2i. We recorded the basic demographic parameters, the development of cardiotoxicity (heart failure incidence, heart failure admissions, new cardiomyopathy [&amp;gt;10% decline in ejection fraction to &amp;lt;50%], and clinically significant arrhythmias) as well as the abnormal levels of troponin I (tnI) and natriuretic peptides (NTproBNP). Results Age, sex, ethnicity, cancer type, cancer stage, and other cardiac risk factors were similar between groups. The mean duration of the follow up was 2 years. In the SLT2 group were included 86 patients and in the control group 97. The rates of the cardiotoxicity events were recorded as follow : (SGLT2 vs control) Heart failure (7.4% vs 31.9%, p&amp;lt;0.01), heart failure admissions (3.4% vs 12.3%, p&amp;lt;0.05), new cardiomyopathy (6.1% vs 27.2%, p&amp;lt;0.05), arrhythmias (2.7% vs 24.3%, p&amp;lt;0.01), abnormal tnI levels (4.2% vs 14.7% , p&amp;lt; 0.01), abnormal NTproBNP levels (6.4% vs 30.9%, p&amp;lt;0.01) Conclusions SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with lower rate of cardiac events among patients with cancer and DM who were treated with anthracyclines. Further studies are needed in order to test the possible cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients at high cardiac risk treated with anthracyclines.

Comorbidities, pharmacologic interventions, and mechanical interventions associated with mortality in isolated diastolic left heart failure: lessons from a national database.

Diastolic heart failure may be noted in paediatric patients with CHD, cardiomyopathy, or malignancies requiring chemotherapy, but the available data are scarce, and often derived from adult trials or based on theoretic or anecdotal evidence. Data between 2016 and 2021 were obtained from Pediatric Health Information System database. Patients <18 years of age with isolated diastolic heart failure admitted to ICU at some point during admission were included. They were divided into patients with and without inpatient mortality. Patients' demographics, comorbidities using ICD-10 codes, and pharmacologic interventions were also recorded. Univariate analysis was done in demographics, comorbidities, pharmacologic interventions, and mechanical interventions between admissions with and without mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was done for inpatient mortality and multivariable linear regression was done for total hospital length of stay in survivors. Isolated diastolic heart failure comprised 0.5% of critically ill paediatric patients. A total of 121 (5%) experienced mortality among the 2,273 admissions in the final analyses. Milrinone and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor were found to be associated with decreased mortality. Increasing age and diuretics were associated with decreased total hospital length of stay in survivors. In the cohort studied, isolated diastolic left heart failure has a 5% mortality. Several comorbidities and interventions are associated with increased mortality with milrinone and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors being associated with decreased risk of mortality. When only admissions with survival to discharge are considered, older age and diuretics are associated with lower total hospital length of stay.

Understanding the benefits of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and influence of hyperkalaemia on their prescription: a UK survey of healthcare professionals' views and practice

Abstract Background Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and they should be increased to the maximally tolerated dose. However, their use is often hindered by hyperkalaemia leading to discontinuation or down titration. Purpose Assess perceptions of primary and secondary healthcare professionals regarding benefits of RAASi according to indication and, in the context of developing hyperkalaemia, to identify barriers to optimal utilisation, and to explore options for improving management protocols, specifically in HFrEF. Methods An electronic survey was distributed in primary and secondary care setting in Hampshire, UK, to evaluate knowledge about benefits of RAASi, clinical response to varying level of potassium (K+), and decision-making using several clinical scenarios. Hyperkalaemia was graded into mild (serum K+ 5.5 – 5.9 mmol/L), moderate (serum K+ 6.0 – 6.4 mmol/L) or severe (serum K+ ≥ 6.5 mmol/L). Results Between November 2021 and January 2023, 300 questionnaires were completed by 274 (91%) physicians (varying grades of seniority), 22 (7%) non-medical prescribers, and 4 (1%) pharmacists. 80% were working in secondary care across different specialities (31 working in cardiology and 15 in nephrology). The majority were aware of prognostic benefit of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in patients with HFrEF although this was lower for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) (Fig 1). Fewer than 2/3 of respondents were aware of impact of ACEi on symptoms. In the presence of mild hyperkalaemia, 75% and 88% of healthcare professionals would stop or reduce ACEi and MRA, respectively. In moderate or severe hyperkalaemia, this increased to 96% and 97%, respectively (Fig 2A-B). When considering the scenario of a patient with HFrEF who had ACEi stopped due to K+ 5.9 mmol/L, the potassium at which the responder would consider re-starting the ACEi ranged from 77% when potassium level &amp;lt; 5.5 mmol/L to 1% in moderate or severe hyperkalaemia (Fig 2C). 74% of healthcare professionals were familiar with local hyperkalaemia management protocol and 93% supported dedicated training on RAASi dose adjustment and hyperkalaemia management. Conclusion This survey, across a broad range of healthcare professionals, shows uncertainties around knowledge of benefits of RAASi in patients with HFrEF and there is sizeable variation in the prescribing response to degrees of hyperkalaemia. Given the voluntary nature of the survey, it is plausible that these data are biased towards individuals with greater understanding. Regardless, there is a need for continued education with a goal of improving patient-centred care.

Pregnancy protection in women of child-bearing age prescribed ACE inhibitors, ARBs or statins - A nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Cardiometabolic disorders, including hypertension, type-2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia are increasingly prevalent among younger people. Consequently, women of child-bearing age may be prescribed renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and statins. Both angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are known teratogens. Statins are considered possibly teratogenic. In Denmark, ACEIs and ARBs have a ‘Do not use’ recommendation in pregnancy while statins ‘Should not be used’ in pregnancy. Previous studies have reported widespread use of RAS inhibitors without concomitant contraception among women of child-bearing age. This study investigated the situation in Denmark. Purpose To examine prescribing patterns of RAS inhibitors and statins alongside use of concomitant contraception among women of child-bearing age in Denmark. Methods Using nationwide Danish registers, women aged 15–50 years initiating ACEIs, ARBs and statins during 1995–2021 were identified and use of concomitant contraception was evaluated. Contraception was categorized as oral pill, implant, intrauterine device (IUD), or non-use. The duration of protection was assumed to be 1 year for oral contraceptives, 2 years for implants and 4 years for IUDs. Where multiple types of contraceptives were retrieved by individual patients, they were categorized as taking the contraceptive retrieved most recently. Data on non-prescription contraceptives were unavailable, e.g., condoms. Women unable to conceive due to infertility were excluded. Results 79 547 women (median age: 44 years; [interquartile range (IQR): 39–47]) on ACEIs, 64 326 women (median age: 44 years [IQR: 38–48]) on ARBs, and 71 499 women (median age: 45 years [IQR: 40–48]) on statins were included (Figure 1). Correspondingly, 69.1%, 62.8%, and 73.5% were not on contraceptives when starting treatment. Among women prescribed contraception: 70.2%/56.2%/63.1% were on oral contraceptives, 25.3%/30.9%/26.6% had IUDs and 4.5%/12.9%/10.3% had implants, respectively (Figure 1). Younger patients aged 15–29 years were least likely to be unprotected with 41.8%/29.7%/33.4% being unprotected. Among women aged 25 to 35 years the percentage of unprotected women was 51.3%/41.1%/47.7%. Older patients were more likely to have IUDs. Conclusion Substantial numbers of women of child-bearing age were prescribed ACEIs, ARBs and statins from 1995–2021. Most were not prescribed contraceptives. The lack of prescribed pregnancy protection was prevalent even among the youngest women aged 15–29 years and women aged 25 to 35 years, who are the most likely to become pregnant—inferring a potential risk of teratogenic exposure during pregnancy (Figure 2). Subsequent studies should investigate the extent of exposure to ACEIs, ARBs, and statins during pregnancy and the impact of the exposure on pregnancy outcomes.Figure 1 Contraceptive useFigure 2 Study rationale

Clinical characteristics and burden of non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a real-world survey in Italy and Spain

Abstract Background Research describing non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM) and the associated burden of illness is sparse. Purpose This research aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with nHCM and the associated clinical and societal burden of illness in Italy (IT) and Spain (ES). Methods Data were from the Adelphi HCM Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection in IT and ES (July 2022–January 2023). Ethics approval was obtained from the Pearl Institutional Review Board. Cardiologists provided data on patient demographics, employment, clinical characteristics, symptoms, support needs and treatment for up to ten consecutively consulting adult HCM patients. Patients voluntarily completed a survey containing the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23 (KCCQ). Analyses were descriptive and the mean [SD] was summarized for continuous variables. Results Overall, 112 cardiologists provided data for 483 patients with nHCM from IT (243) and ES (240). The mean age [SD] was 54.3 [14.1] and 58.0 [16.0], with 66.3% and 61.7% of patients being male, in IT and ES respectively. Eighty-four percent and 92.1% of patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) II, 14.8% and 7.1% were NYHA III, and 1.2% and 0.8% were NYHA IV, in IT and ES respectively. Among patients who completed the KCCQ, the mean [SD] KCCQ-clinical summary score was 84.9 [12.9] in IT and 81.8 [20.7] in ES. Regarding work-related impact, 30.8% (IT) and 16.7% (ES) of patients had taken time off work due to nHCM in the last three months, and 41.6% (IT) and 48.4% (ES) were not working full-time, of which 5.6% (IT) and 11.0% (ES) were not working full time due to nHCM. Additionally, 17.6% and 18.2% of patients experienced a delayed diagnosis in IT and ES respectively, with 24.0% (IT) and 25.0% (ES) having multiple delays to diagnosis. The most common symptoms reported by physicians were dyspnoea when active (83.7%), palpitations (29.3%) and fatigue (25.7%). The most prevalent concomitant conditions were hypertension (20.5%), anxiety (18.6%), and atrial fibrillation (18.4%). In IT and ES, respectively, 77.8% and 74.2% of patients were currently prescribed treatment for nHCM. The most frequently prescribed treatments were beta-blockers (83.3%), diuretics (32.1%) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (20.5%), alone or in combination. In IT and ES respectively, 14.4% and 18.8% of patients required caregiver support, at a mean [SD] of 46.3 [52.4] and 44.2 [47.5] hours per week. Conclusions While the majority of patients with nHCM were classified as NYHA II, a considerable clinical and societal burden is evident. Burden was demonstrated by the high prevalence of symptoms, comorbidities, disruptions to employment and the requirement for caregiver support among these patients, highlighting the need for new treatment and management approaches to enhance health outcomes and reduce societal impact.

Temporal trends and regional differences of initial oral antiarrhythmic drug options in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation: a report from the GLORIA-AF registry

Abstract Background New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are commonly used for treating such patients. However, whether there are temporal changes and regional differences in the choice of AADs in direct acting non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) era is less studied. Purpose The present study aimed to analyze the temporal trends and regional differences of initial oral AAD options in patients with new-onset AF in the GLORIA-AF registry, based on a proposed modernized classification of AADs in 2018 (Circulation, 2018, PMID: 30354657). AADs involved in the present study included traditional Vaughn-Williams Class I to Class IV AAD, Class IId AAD (digoxin), and Class VII AAD, which acts on the upstream of arrhythmia including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, angiotensin receptor blocker, and stains. Methods Temporal changes regarding the AAD use between the two phases of GLORIA-AF and regional differences of AADs choice were investigated. Factors associated with the choice of different AADs were established by multivariate logistic regression. Results Among the 36,617 participants in the GLORIA-AF registry, 33,208 (90.7%) were prescribed with AADs: 74.0% were rate control and 10.2% were rhythm control, and among the prescribed AADs, single and dual AADs were used in 73.3% and 24.9%, respectively. Moreover, 70.5% patients received upstream target modulators (Class VII AAD). Class IIa AADs (beta-blockers) were the most commonly prescribed AAD and slightly increased from Phase II (60.58%) to Phase III (62.91%) while the use of Class IId AAD (e.g. digoxin) decreased regardless of single or combined use. AADs use varied significantly among regions but the temporal trends and regional differences were similar with that of the overall cohort. Age, gender, comorbidities, admission signs, region, and concomitant medications (e.g. anticoagulants) were associated with the choices of different AADs. Conclusions In the DOAC era, new-onset AF patients receiving AAD commonly included upstream therapy. Rate control was still the dominant strategy for patients with new-onset AF but the use of Class IId AAD significantly decreased with the increased use of Class IIa AAD. The choice of AADs demonstrated significant regional differences and concomitant anticoagulants played important roles.Temporal trends in GLORIA-AFComparisons of AADs use in GLORIA-AF