Conversion Surgery For Gastric Cancer Research Articles

Reliability of computed tomography to determine the eligibility of conversion surgery for gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

259 Background: Although gastric cancer (GC) with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis is diagnosed as stage IV and basically treated with chemotherapy, it can be the candidate of conversion surgery when PAN metastasis was limited in localized area as oligometastatic status. Recently, we reported that pathological complete response at PAN (pCR at PAN) after chemotherapy was a good surrogate marker in conversion surgery for GC with PAN metastasis. However, it is difficult to predict pCR at PAN before surgery. Computed tomography (CT) is a standard procedure for clinical diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in GC.This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of CT to predict pCR at PAN after chemotherapy. Methods: The study examined patients who received radical gastrectomy with D2 and PAN dissection after chemotherapy for gastric cancer with PAN metastasis (#16a2/b1) from 2004 to 2020. PAN greater than 10mm in long axis was diagnosed as clinically positive. Patients were classified into 2 groups as pPAN-CR and pPAN-nonCR according to the pathological diagnosis of PAN. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for PAN diagnosis were retrospectively investigated. Moreover, the relationship between shrinkage ratio at PAN and pathological diagnosis was also investigated. Results: A total of 46 patients were examined in the present study. The number of pPAN-CR and pPAN-nonCR patients were 31 and 15, respectively. 5-year overall survival rate was 76% in pPAN-CR and 0% in pPAN-nonCR patients. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PAN were 52.2%, 60.0%, 48.4%, 36.0%, and 28.6%, respectively. Median shrinkage ratio of PAN was 38% (-20%-88%) in pPAN-CR and 40% (-20%-75%) in pPAN-nonCR patients. There was no statistically significant relationship between shrinkage ratio and pathological diagnosis of PAN ( p=0.655). Conclusions: CT diagnosis for PAN after chemotherapy was not reliable. The indication of conversion surgery for GC with PAN metastasis should not be determined based on the size and shrinkage of PAN.

Long-term survival of HER2 positive gastric cancer patient with multiple liver metastases who obtained pathological complete response after systemic chemotherapy: A case report.

Introduction and importanceAdvanced gastric cancer with liver metastasis is classified as stage IV disease and is generally treated with systemic chemotherapy. Despite recent advances in chemotherapy regimens, the prognosis for gastric cancer with liver metastasis is poor. Recent studies reported the effectiveness of upfront chemotherapy followed by conversion surgery for gastric cancer with liver metastasis. Here, we report a case of an advanced stage IV gastric cancer with liver metastasis treated with upfront systemic chemotherapy followed by conversion surgery, which resulted in pathological complete response and good prognosis.Case presentationA 79-year-old man diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases. He underwent systemic chemotherapy with capecitabine, cisplatin, and trastuzumab. After 14 courses of chemotherapy, the primary tumor and liver metastases shrank, suggesting a partial response. We performed distal gastrectomy with D2 dissection plus lateral hepatic segment resection. Pathological examination revealed no residual tumor cells in the primary or metastatic sites, which indicated a pathological complete response. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8. Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy was started on postoperative day 46 and given for 1 year. The patient has been alive and recurrence-free for approximately 5 years after surgery.ConclusionThis case shows the possibility of conversion surgery after systemic chemotherapy for stage IV advanced gastric cancer with liver metastasis.

Clinical Significance of Conversion Surgery for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Dissemination: A Retrospective Study

Objective: Although chemotherapy has been clinically recommended as the initial treatment for patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer, poor prognosis has been noted among the same patients. However, the prognostic significance of conversion surgery after chemotherapy remains unclear. The present study therefore aimed to assess the clinical impact of conversion surgery among patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 93 patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer undergoing chemotherapy between February 2002 and October 2019 were retrospectively enrolled and subsequently divided into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD groups based on tumor response to chemotherapy. Results: Among the included patients, 17 developed distant metastases at another site besides peritoneal dissemination. Based on tumor response, 24 and 69 patients were determined to have PD and non-PD, respectively, with the former having significantly poorer prognosis than the latter (p < 0.0001). A total of 19 patients underwent conversion surgery after chemotherapy, with the presence or absence of conversion surgery being significantly correlated with age, first-line chemotherapy regimen, and tumor response (p = 0.0134, p = 0.0337, and p = 0.0024, respectively). Patients in the non-PD group who underwent conversion surgery or chemotherapy alone had 3-year overall survival rates of 55.6 and 6.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified conversion surgery alone as an independent prognostic factor in the non-PD group (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our retrospective study demonstrated that conversion surgery for gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination might improve the prognosis of responders who developed no peritoneal dissemination after chemotherapy.

Indication and Prognostic Significance of Conversion Surgery in Patients with Liver Metastasis from Gastric Cancer

Objective: Chemotherapy is generally recommended as the first-line standard treatment in patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer. However, the clinical impact of surgical treatment remains unclear in responders after chemotherapy. The present study aimed to investigate the tumor response and prognosis after chemotherapy and to assess the clinical indication of conversion surgery in responders. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 44 patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer who were treated with chemotherapy between February 2002 and January 2019. These patients were classified into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD groups according to tumor response. Results: Among the 44 patients, 7 and 26 had peritoneal dissemination and ≥5 had metastatic liver nodules. Additionally, 15 and 29 patients had PD and non-PD, respectively. Surgical treatment was significantly correlated with tumor response (p < 0.0321). Prognostic differences between the PD and non-PD groups were significant (p < 0.0001). Moreover, gastrectomy and hepatectomy were significantly correlated with the number of liver metastases (≥5 vs. <5, respectively) in the non-PD group (p = 0.0025 and p = 0.0169, respectively). The 3-year survival rates among patients with non-PD undergoing both gastrectomy and hepatectomy (n = 6), gastrectomy alone (n = 7), and nonsurgical treatments (n = 16) were 100, 66.7, and 0%, respectively (p = 0.0026). Multivariate analysis identified peritoneal dissemination as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.0225). Conclusion: Our preliminary results suggest that conversion surgery for gastric cancer with liver metastasis might be clinically indicated in chemotherapy responders with <5 metastatic liver nodules and without peritoneal dissemination.

CONVERSION SURGERY FOR STAGE IV GASTRIC CANCER. LITERATURE REVIEW AND OWN EXPERIENCE

Metastatic gastric cancer is associated with poor prognosis despite of advances in chemotherapy and surgery. According to current clinical guidelines surgical treatment for stage IV gastric cancer patients is indicated only for urgent complications. New approach for the management of patients with initially unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer includes primary systemic chemotherapy and following surgical resection if the patients are able to undergo complete resection. This approach is known as conversion surgery. In the review with presentation of own experience the results of conversion surgery for gastric cancer with distant metastases of various localization (liver, paraaortic lymph nodes and peritoneum) were reported. These results allow to define indications for this treatment strategy. 15 conversion surgery cases are presented, 12 of them were combined with HIPEC or PIPAC. Median progression-free survival was 18 months. Conclusion: literature analysis and own experience have shown that conversion surgery after chemotherapy increases the overall survival of patients with oligometastatic gastric cancer who underwent complete resection as compared with palliative chemotherapy. However the clear selection criteria for conversion surgery are needed from randomized controlled trials.

Conversion Surgery for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis Based on the Diagnosis of Second-Look Staging Laparoscopy

BackgroundPatients with positive peritoneal cytology (CY1) or peritoneal dissemination (P1) have significantly poor prognosis. We performed pre-therapeutic staging laparoscopy (SL) to diagnose peritoneal metastasis for patients with advanced gastric cancer. When peritoneal metastasis disappears by chemotherapy for patients with CY1 or P1, we have intention to perform conversion surgery (CS). This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of CS for such patients. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer (large type 3, type 4, serosa-invasion) who underwent SL between 2005 and 2014. Disappearance of peritoneal metastasis was confirmed by second-look SL. ResultsCY0P0, CY1P0, and P1 were found in 56, 26, and 33 patients, respectively. In patients with CY1P0, 12 patients (66.7%) underwent CS (R0) as peritoneal cytology turned negative. All cases received S-1-based regimens, with median five treatment courses. The survival of patients with CS was significantly longer than those without CS (median survival time (MST); 41 vs. 11 months, respectively, P < 0.001). We observed no difference in overall survival between patients who underwent CS and patients with CY0P0 at the first SL (P = 0.913). All patients with P1 received chemotherapy. As peritoneal metastasis of five patients (15.2%) disappeared by chemotherapy, those patients underwent the CS (R0). The survival of patients who underwent CS was significantly longer than those who did not (MST; 31 vs. 10 months, respectively, P = 0.034). ConclusionThis study suggests that conversion surgery contributes to improvement in survival of patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Conversion surgery for gastric cancer: A cohort study from a western center

BackgroundAdvanced unresectable gastric cancer has a dismal prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent induction chemotherapy ± gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Material and methodsAll patients referred to our center with a clinical diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced or stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma between April 2005 and August 2016 were included in the study. Cox regression was performed to find independent prognostic factor among the considered variable. ResultsThe cohort included 73 patients: 16 had best supportive care, 35 chemotherapy alone and 22 chemotherapy plus radical surgery. Thirty-three patients underwent surgery after chemotherapy. Twenty-two patients had R0 surgery, while the remaining 11 had only an exploratory procedure. Nine patients (40.9%) underwent gastrectomy plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Three patients out of 22 developed postoperative complications with a Clavien-Dindo grade above 2. Median survival was 50 months for patients who had chemotherapy plus surgery while it was 14 and 3 for those who had chemotherapy alone and best supportive care, respectively (p < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis performed on the whole cohort identified only radical conversion surgery as an independent factor positively associated with survival (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05–0.29, p < 0.0001). ConclusionConversion gastrectomy, when R0 could be achieved, is associated with long survivals and it is the most important prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further studies are needed to define the ideal patient who can really benefit from this treatment.

Successful conversion surgery for gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases treated after S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy: a case report

BackgroundGastric cancer with multiple liver metastases have poor prognosis. Recently, stage IV gastric cancer patients who respond well to systemic chemotherapy can be treated by gastrectomy. We herein report a case of advanced gastric cancer with liver metastases who was successfully downstaged by systemic chemotherapy and underwent conversion surgery.Case presentationA 60-year-old male patient was diagnosed with gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases [cT3N3M1, stage IV]. After 18 courses of S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy (S-1 administered orally (80 mg/m2/day) twice a day for 21 consecutive days and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) infused on day 8), marked regression of liver metastasis was achieved, and we performed open total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. The patient was discharged from the hospital 10 days after the operation. Histopathological examination revealed no malignant cells in the lymph nodes [ypT1bN0M0, stage IA]. S-1 as the adjuvant chemotherapy was administered for 12 months, and the patient is alive without a recurrence for 33 months after surgery.ConclusionsConversion surgery may improve the poor prognosis of gastric cancer.