Conventional External Beam Radiation Research Articles

Dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful vertebral metastases: A randomized phase 3 trial.

The purpose of this randomised study was to determine whether dose-intensified stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for painful vertebral metastases results in increased rates of pain improvement compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) (control) 6 months after treatment. This randomized, controlled phase 3 trial was conducted between November 2016 and January 2023, when it was stopped early. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had one or two painful, stable, or potentially unstable vertebral metastases; and had a life expectancy of 1 year or longer according to the investigator's estimates. Patients received 48.5 grays (Gy) in 10 fractions (with epidural involvement) or 40 Gy in five fractions (without epidural involvement) in the SBRT group and 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in five fractions in the cEBRT group, respectively. The primary end point was an improvement in the pain score at the treated site by at least 2 points (on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 points) at 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol basis. Of 214 patients who were screened for eligibility, 63 were randomized 1:1 between SBRT (33 patients with 36 metastases) and cEBRT (30 patients with 31 metastases). The median age of all patients was 66 years, and 40 patients were men (63.5%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 6-month proportion of patients who had metastases with pain reduction by 2 or more points was significantly higher in the SBRT group versus the control group (69.4% vs. 41.9%, respectively; two-sided p=.02). Changes in opioid medication intake relative to baseline were nonsignificant between the groups. No differences were observed in vertebral compression fracture or adverse event rates between the groups. Dose-intensified SBRT improved pain score more effectively than cEBRT at 6 months.

The use of carbon fiber/polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) in pedicle screw fixation for spinal neoplasms-potential advantages in postoperative imaging and radiotherapy planning.

Titanium pedicle screw fixation complicates postoperative care in patients with spinal neoplasms due to postoperative imaging artefacts and dose perturbation. This study aims to measure the benefits of using carbon fiber/polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) pedicle fixation compared to titanium in postoperative imaging, radiotherapy planning and delivery for spinal neoplasms treated with conventional external beam radiotherapy with a commercial treatment planning system. The properties of CF/PEEK pedicle fixation systems were compared to titanium in radiotherapy dose planning accuracy and postoperative computed tomography (CT) image quality. Dose profiles through the screw, tulip and longitudinal axis of the screw were acquired with radiochromic films and compared to a collapsed cone algorithm simulation, to measure dose agreement. The image quality of postoperative CTs were compared by defining four regions of interest around the vertebrae and screws in water phantom models and previous planning CTs, and comparing calculated artefact indexes (AIs). CF/PEEK screws have non-inferior dosimetric prediction accuracy up to 50 mm beneath the screw for collapsed-cone algorithm planning systems. There is a statistically significant reduction in the absolute difference between calculated and measured dose at a depth of 2 mm beneath the screw. There is minimal attenuation with CF/PEEK relative to the surrounding dose, extending to 50 mm beneath the screw. There is a statistically significant improvement in CT imaging quality with reduced AIs in CF/PEEK fixation compared to titanium in both model and patient CT plans. CF/PEEK pedicle fixation can provide benefits in postoperative imaging and photon radiotherapy planning and delivery to patients with spinal neoplasms.

Early Experience With Two-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Spinal Metastases.

Spinal metastases are common in metastatic cancer, affecting around 40% of patients. The primary treatment involves radiation therapy, transitioning from conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for its superior, durable response. While spine SBRT has gained popularity in the United States, Level I evidence supporting it over EBRT is limited to a Canadian trial using a 2-fraction SBRT regimen. We present our findings from one of the earliest US experiences of 2-fraction spine SBRT for spinal metastases. A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic spine cancer receiving 2-fraction spine SBRT at a single center was conducted. Patients received treatment based on Level 1 evidence (24Gy in 2 fractions). Follow-up records were assessed for local control outcomes and toxicity. Twenty patients since August 2022 have been treated with 2-fraction spine SBRT. Most patients were treated at 1 (45%) or 2 (40%) spinal levels, with the thoracic (55%) and lumbar (50%) spine being the most common locations. Common primary sites included the lung (30%), breast (20%), esophagus (15%), and prostate (10%). The rate of local control was 100%, while the rate of vertebral compression fracture was 15%. No esophageal or bowel toxicity occurred, and no fractures required intervention. These findings suggest that 2-fraction spine SBRT is safe and effective, consistent with existing Level I evidence. Our local control rate exceeding 95% aligns with the literature, indicating the feasibility and achievability of implementing this approach in the United States over a short period of time.

Separation Surgery for Metastatic Spine Tumors: How Less Became More

Abstract Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is an increasingly common clinical entity in cancer patients and is associated with significant morbidity and neurologic sequalae. Management of MESCC has undergone many significant paradigms shifts over the past 50 years and was at times managed exclusively with either surgery or radiation. Historically, aggressive surgical techniques to achieve en bloc or intralesional gross tumor resections were pursued but were associated with significant morbidity and poor tumor control rates when combined with conventional external beam radiation. However, improvements in radiation treatment delivery in the form of stereotactic body radiation therapy have allowed for the safe delivery of high dose conformal photon beam radiation providing histology-independent ablative responses. This shifted the goals of surgery away from maximal tumor resection towards simple spinal cord decompression with reconstitution of the thecal to create a tumor target volume capable of being irradiated within the constraints of spinal cord tolerance. This new approach of creating space between the thecal sac and the tumor was termed separation surgery and when combined with postoperative SBRT is referred to as hybrid therapy called hybrid therapy. Herein, we will describe the evolution of the management of MESCC, the technique of separation surgery and its outcomes, and finish with an illustrative case example.

Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases

Conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are commonly used treatment options for relieving metastatic bone pain. The effectiveness of SBRT compared with cEBRT in pain relief has been a subject of debate, and conflicting results have been reported. To compare the effectiveness associated with SBRT vs cEBRT for relieving metastatic bone pain. A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on June 5, 2023. Additionally, results were added from a new randomized clinical trial (RCT) and additional unpublished data from an already published RCT. Comparative studies reporting pain response after SBRT vs cEBRT in patients with painful bone metastases. Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Data were extracted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Overall and complete pain response at 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy, according to the study's definition. Relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each study. A random-effects model using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied for meta-analysis. There were 18 studies with 1685 patients included in the systematic review and 8 RCTs with 1090 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 7 RCTs, overall pain response was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints in clinical trials (ICPRE). The complete pain response was reported in 6 RCTs, all defined according to the ICPRE. The ITT meta-analyses showed that the overall pain response rates did not differ between cEBRT and SBRT at 1 (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30), 3 (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.47), or 6 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96-1.54) months. However, SBRT was associated with a higher complete pain response at 1 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01), 3 (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.78), and 6 (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.91) months after radiotherapy. The PP meta-analyses showed comparable results. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with painful bone metastases experienced similar overall pain response after SBRT compared with cEBRT. More patients had complete pain alleviation after SBRT, suggesting that selected subgroups will benefit from SBRT.

Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionation external beam radiotherapy in intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer

BackgroundProstate cancer is the second most common malignancy in men, and its incidence is increasing which is attributed to increased screening programs. The treatment options of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy is becoming more popular lately due to better understanding of the radiobiology of prostate cancer and favorable logistics.ObjectiveTo compare the toxicity and efficacy of hypofractionated versus conventional fractionation external beam radiotherapy in patients with intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer treated in Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital and Research Center, Lahore (SKMCH & RC).MethodologyWe retrospectively conducted this study on histopathologically confirmed 114 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment from January 2013 till December 2018. These patients were treated with radical radiotherapy along with hormonal therapy as per indication. Data was collected from electronic hospital system and analyzed by SPSS version 23.Results114 patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 68 years (61–75). 88% of patients had stage III-IVA disease at the time of diagnosis. Mean PSA and GS was 33 ± 39 SD and 7 ± 0.9 SD respectively. 89% (n = 102) received radiotherapy with 69% of patients receiving dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions. Among patients who received hypofractionated dose, 86% (n = 61) of them were categorized as high risk and 14% (n = 10) were intermediate risk, whereas among conventional group 90% (n = 28) were high risk patients and 10% (n = 3) were of intermediate risk. In hypofractionated dose group, 14% (n = 10) developed grade 2 proctitis and 8% (n = 6) developed grade 2 cystitis, in contrast to conventional dose group in which only 3 patients (5%) developed grade 2 GI toxicity and 2 patients (2.9%) had grade 2 GU toxicity. However, these toxicities and their grade were clinically insignificant when compared with the dose groups (p = 0.11). 5 year overall survival for hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional dose was 100% and 90% respectively with 95% Cl and p value of 0.3 (clinically insignificant), whereas 5 year disease free survival was 100% and 75% for hypofractionation versus conventional EBRT respectively with 95% CI and p value of 0.04 (clinically significant).ConclusionHypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer has better disease free survival at the expense of higher risk for proctitis and cystitis but no difference in overall survival as compared to conventional dose of radiation.

An Economic Analysis of SC24 in Canada: A Randomized Study of SBRT Compared With Conventional Palliative RT for Spinal Metastases

Purposexx.xx was a multicenter randomized controlled phase 2/3 trial conducted in Canada and Australia. Patients with painful spinal metastases were randomized to either 24 Gy/2 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or 20 Gy/5 conventional external beam radiotherapy (CRT). The study met its primary endpoint demonstrating superior complete pain response rates (CRR) at 3 months following SBRT (35%) vs CRT (14%). SBRT planning and delivery is resource intensive. Given its benefits in xx.xx, we performed an economic analysis to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of SBRT compared to CRT. MethodsThe trial recruited 229 patients. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a Markov model taking into account observed survival, treatments costs, including retreatment, and quality of life (QoL) over the lifetime of the patient. The EORTC-QLU-C10D was used to determine QoL values. Transition probabilities for outcomes were from available patient data. Health system costs were from the Canadian health care perspective and based on 2021 Canadian dollars (CDN). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed as the ratio of incremental cost to quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Impact of parameter uncertainty was investigated using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTSThe base case for SBRT compared to CRT had an ICER of $9,040CDN per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER was most sensitive to variations in the utility assigned to the “No local failure” ($5,457CDN to $241,051CDN per QALY), adopting low and high estimates of utility) and the cost of the SBRT (ICERs ranging from $7,345 to $123,361CDN per QALY). It was more robust to variations in assumptions around survival and the response rate. ConclusionsSBRT is associated with higher upfront costs compared to CRT. The ICER shows that, within the Canadian health care system, SBRT with 2 fractions is likely to be cost-effective relative to CRT.

A Comparative Study of the Toxicities and Local Recurrence of Conventional External Beam Radiotherapy versus Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer amongst women, which is treated by a multi-modality approach consisting of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Objective: The aim of the study is to compare the early and late treatment toxicities and the local recurrence following Conventional and Hypofractionated External Beam Radiotherapy in breast cancer patients after surgery. Methods: A randomized study was conducted for two years including 150 patients. The patients were divided into two arms, with Arm-A receiving a total dose of 50Gy/25# and the Arm-B receiving 40Gy/16#. Results: Early and late treatment toxicities were comparable in both the arms, except for skin toxicity which was more in the hypofractionated arm (Arm-B). Local Recurrence was observed in Arm-A in 1 patient at Month 17 of follow-up, and in Arm-B at Month 13 in 1 patient and at Month 21 in 1 patient. Conclusion: Hypofractionated radiotherapy given over a short period of time is comparable to Conventional fractionation radiotherapy without any significant statistical difference in terms of toxicities or local recurrence; with an added advantage of reduced treatment time, reduced duration of hospital stays, better patients’ compliance and reduced cost of treatment.

Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases

Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.

Dosimetric Comparison of Conventional Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Proton Beam Therapy for Palliation of Thoracic Spine Metastases Secondary to Breast or Prostate Cancer.

The aim of this planning study was to compare the dosimetric outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Proton Beam Therapy (PBT), and conventional External Beam Radiation Therapy (cEBRT) in the treatment of thoracic spinal metastases originating from breast or prostate cancer. Our study utilized data from 30 different treatment plans and evaluated target coverage and doses to vital organs at risk (OARs), such as the spinal cord, heart, esophagus, and lungs. The results showed that VMAT and PBT achieved superior target coverage and significantly lower doses to the spinal cord compared to cEBRT (target: median PTVD95%: 75.2 for cEBRT vs. 92.9 and 91.7 for VMAT (p < 0.001) and PBT (p < 0.001), respectively; spinal cord: median Dmax%: 105.1 for cEBRT vs. 100.4 and 103.6 for VMAT (p < 0.001) and PBT (p = 0.002), respectively). Specifically, VMAT was notable for its superior target coverage and PBT for significantly lower doses to heart, lungs, and esophagus. However, VMAT resulted in higher lung doses, indicating potential trade-offs among different techniques. The study demonstrated the relative advantages of VMAT and PBT over traditional RT in the palliative treatment of spinal metastases using conventional fractionation. These findings underscore the potential of VMAT and PBT to improve dosimetric outcomes, suggesting that they may be more suitable for certain patient groups for whom the sparing of specific OARs is especially important.

A new Chinese standard for testing of quality control in medical proton/heavy ion beam radiotherapy equipment

With the development of social economy and radiotherapy technique, proton/heavy ion radiotherapy has been applied widely to clinical practices. At present, there are at least 29 hospitals in China at various stages of planning, construction, commissioning or clinical operation of medical proton/heavy ion beam radiotherapy equipment. Compared with common radiotherapy accelerators used in conventional external beam radiotherapy, the proton/heavy ion therapy system has more stringent requirements for quality control so as to achieve an optimum therapeutic effect. In order to protect the health rights of patients undergoing radiotherapy, to facilitate the relevant administrative supervision departments to carry out standard-based approval and routine supervision and to promote the development of related medical undertakings, the standard for testing of quality control for medical proton/heavy ion beam radiotherapy equipment is drafted to fill the gap in this regard in China and even worldwide. The standard contains five indicators and corresponding testing methods for radiological protection and safety and 16 indicators for quality control of equipment performance. The standard is a mandatory standard and is based on the relevant Chinese legal requirements for the testing of radiotherapy equipment, so all the indicators listed in the standard shall be tested. During the drafting of the standard, the opinions from hospitals that are currently using proton/heavy ion medical accelerators for radiotherapy purpose and from the related equipment manufacturers were taken into account. The draft standard was revised with reference to these opinions and the feasibility of the related quality control requirements. The official version of the standard was released on March 7, 2023, and implementation is scheduled to begin on March 1, 2024.

A critical appraisal of the four systematic reviews and meta-analysis on stereotactic body radiation therapy versus external beam radiotherapy for painful bone metastases and where we go from here.

Radiotherapy is an important treatment modality for pain control in patients with bone metastases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which allows delivering a much higher dose per fraction while sparing critical structures compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT), has become more widely used, especially in the oligometastatic setting. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the pain response rate of SBRT and cEBRT for bone metastases have shown conflicting results, as have four recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses of these trials. Possible reasons for the different outcomes between these reviews include differences in methodology, which trials were included, and the endpoints examined and how they were defined. We suggest ways to improve analysis of these RCTs, particularly performing an individual patient-level meta-analysis since the trials included heterogeneous populations. The results of such studies will help guide future investigations needed to validate patient selection criteria, optimize SBRT dose schedules, include additional endpoints (such as the time to onset of pain response, durability of pain response, quality of life (QOL), and side effects of SBRT), and better assess the cost-effectiveness and trade-offs of SBRT compared to cEBRT. An international Delphi consensus to guide selection of optimal candidates for SBRT is warranted before more prospective data is available.

Gadolinium-Based Nanoparticles Sensitize Ovarian Peritoneal Carcinomatosis to Targeted Radionuclide Therapy.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy (5-y overall survival rate, 46%). OC is generally detected when it has already spread to the peritoneal cavity (peritoneal carcinomatosis). This study investigated whether gadolinium-based nanoparticles (Gd-NPs) increase the efficacy of targeted radionuclide therapy using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-trastuzumab (an antibody against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). Gd-NPs have radiosensitizing effects in conventional external-beam radiotherapy and have been tested in clinical phase II trials. Methods: First, the optimal activity of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-trastuzumab (10, 5, or 2.5 MBq) combined or not with 10 mg of Gd-NPs (single injection) was investigated in athymic mice bearing intraperitoneal OC cell (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive) tumor xenografts. Next, the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of 5 MBq of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-trastuzumab with Gd-NPs (3 administration regimens) were evaluated. NaCl, trastuzumab plus Gd-NPs, and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-trastuzumab alone were used as controls. Biodistribution and dosimetry were determined, and Monte Carlo simulation of energy deposits was performed. Lastly, Gd-NPs' subcellular localization and uptake, and the cytotoxic effects of the combination, were investigated in 3 cancer cell lines to obtain insights into the involved mechanisms. Results: The optimal [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-trastuzumab activity when combined with Gd-NPs was 5 MBq. Moreover, compared with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-trastuzumab alone, the strongest therapeutic efficacy (tumor mass reduction) was obtained with 2 injections of 5 mg of Gd-NPs/d (separated by 6 h) at 24 and 72 h after injection of 5 MBq of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-trastuzumab. In vitro experiments showed that Gd-NPs colocalized with lysosomes and that their radiosensitizing effect was mediated by oxidative stress and inhibited by deferiprone, an iron chelator. Exposure of Gd-NPs to 177Lu increased the Auger electron yield but not the absorbed dose. Conclusion: Targeted radionuclide therapy can be combined with Gd-NPs to increase the therapeutic effect and reduce the injected activities. As Gd-NPs are already used in the clinic, this combination could be a new therapeutic approach for patients with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Insurance Denial of Care for Randomized Controlled Trial-Eligible Patients: Incidence and Success Rate of Peer-To-Peer Authorization in Allowing Patients to Remain Trial-Eligible.

Insurance denials for clinical trials serve as a pertinent barrier for patients to remain trial-eligible, thus hindering the development of therapies and the overall advancement of health care. We present results from an ongoing oncology randomized clinical trial regarding insurance denials and peer-to-peer authorization (P2PA) success rate in allowing patients to remain trial-eligible. The ongoing Spine Patient Optimal Radiosurgery Treatment for Symptomatic Metastatic Neoplasms Phase II trial randomizes spine cancer patients to treatment with spine radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Trial-eligible patients during the first 3 months of enrollment are examined to determine whether the option of SBRT was denied by their insurance. Advocacy for overcoming SBRT denial in P2PA centered on SBRT being recommended as a preferred treatment modality in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and the recent level I evidence demonstrating the advantages of SBRT over EBRT for symptomatic spine cancer. Of 15 trial-eligible patients, 3 (20%) experienced insurance denials for SBRT. P2PA resulted in the reversal of denials in all 3 patients, allowing each to remain trial-eligible for randomization between SBRT and cEBRT. Despite a clinical oncologic treatment modality for which recent Level 1 evidence is available, the insurance denial rate was 20%. A vigilant P2PA strategy focusing on highlighting National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the supporting Level 1 evidence resulted in a very high rate of reversing initial denial.

Comparison of Hounsfield units and vertebral bone quality score for the prediction of time to pathologic fracture in mobile spine metastases treated with radiotherapy.

Spine metastases are commonly treated with radiotherapy for local tumor control; pathologic fracture is a potential complication of spinal radiotherapy. Both Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) on MRI have been argued to predict stability as measured by odds of pathologic fracture, although it is unclear if there is a difference in the predictive power between the two methodologies. The objective of the present study was to examine whether one methodology is a better predictor of pathologic fracture following radiotherapy for mobile spine metastases. Patients who underwent radiotherapy (conventional external-beam radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, or intensity-modulated radiation therapy) for mobile spine (C1-L5) metastases at a tertiary care center were retrospectively identified. Details regarding underlying pathology, patient demographics, and tumor morphology were collected. Vertebral involvement was assessed using the Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) system. Bone quality of the non-tumor-involved bone was assessed on both pretreatment CT and MRI. Univariable analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of fracture, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to identify significant predictors of time to pathologic fracture. Stepwise Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of time to fracture. One hundred patients were included (mean age 62.7 ± 11.9 years; 61% male), of whom 35 experienced postradiotherapy pathologic fractures. The most common histologies were lung (22%), prostate (21%), breast (14%), and renal cell (13%). On univariable analysis, the mean HUs of the vertebrae adjacent to the fractured vertebra were significantly lower among those experiencing fracture; VBQ was not significantly associated with fracture odds. Survival analysis showed that average HUs ≤ 132, nonprostate pathology, involvement of ≥ 3 vertebral body segments on the WBB system, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 7, and the presence of axial pain all predicted increased odds of fracture (all p < 0.001). Cox regression found that HUs ≤ 132 (OR 2.533, 95% CI 1.257-5.103; p = 0.009), ≥ 3 WBB vertebral body segments involved (OR 2.376, 95% CI 1.132-4.987; p = 0.022), and axial pain (OR 2.036, 95% CI 0.916-4.526; p = 0.081) predicted increased fracture odds, while prostate pathology predicted decreased odds (OR 0.076, 95% CI 0.009-0.613; p = 0.016). Sensitivity analysis suggested that an HU threshold of ≤ 132 and a SINS of ≥ 7 identified patients at increased risk of fracture. The present results suggest that bone density surrogates as measured on CT, but not MRI, can be used to predict the risk of pathologic fracture following radiotherapy for mobile spine metastases. More extensive vertebral body involvement and the presence of mechanical axial pain additionally predict increased fracture odds.

Treatment of ambulatory patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Approximately 10% of patients with spinal metastases develop metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), which left undiagnosed and untreated can lead to the loss of ambulation. Timely diagnosis and efficient multidisciplinary treatment are critically important to optimize neurological outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the most efficient treatment for ambulatory patients with MESCC. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of mobile patients with MESCC in terms of outcomes described as local control (LC), ambulatory function, quality of life (QOL), morbidity, and overall survival (OS). Overall, 54 papers (4101 patients) were included. A trend toward improved LC with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) was demonstrated: random effects modeling 1-year LC rate 86% (95% CI 84%-88%) versus 81% (95% CI 74%-86%) (p > 0.05), respectively, and common effects modeling 1-year LC rate 85% (95% CI 82%-87%) versus 76% (95% CI 74%-78%) (p < 0.05). Surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, either cEBRT or SBRT, showed no significant benefit in either LC (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.19) or ambulatory function (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.83-2.74) compared with radiotherapy without surgery. There was a significant benefit of surgery compared with cEBRT regarding QOL, and furthermore SBRT alone provided long-term improvement in QOL. The type of treatment was not a significant predictor of OS, but fully ambulatory status was significantly associated with improved OS (HR 0.46-0.52, relative risk 1.79-2.3). Radiation-induced myelopathy is a rare complication of SBRT (2 patients [0.1%] in the included papers). The morbidity rate associated with surgery was relatively high, with a 10% wound complication rate and 1.6% hardware-failure rate. SBRT is an extremely promising treatment modality being integrated into treatment algorithms and provides durable LC. In mobile patients with MESCC, surgery does not improve LC, survival, or ambulatory function; nonetheless, there is a significant benefit of surgery in terms of QOL. In patients with MESCC without neurological deficit, the role of surgery is still debatable as studies demonstrate good LC for patients who undergo SBRT without preceding surgery. However, surgery can provide safe margins for the administration of the ablative dose of SBRT to the entire tumor volume within the constraints of spinal cord tolerance. Further randomized controlled trials are needed on the benefit of surgery before SBRT in mobile patients with MESCC. With the excellent results of separation surgery and SBRT, the role of highly invasive vertebrectomy is diminishing given the complication rate and morbidity of these procedures.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Posterior Element Only Spinal Metastases: Outcomes and Validation of Recommended Clinical Target Volume Delineation Practice

Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) results in improved local control and pain response compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy. Consensus stipulates MRI-based delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) is critical and is based on spine segment sector involvement. The applicability of these contouring guidelines to metastases confined to the posterior elements is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the patterns of failure, as well as the safety of treating posterior element metastases when the vertebral body was intentionally excluded from the CTV. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of 605 patients and 1412 spine segments treated with spine SBRT was performed. Only treated segments involving the posterior elements alone were included for the analyses. The primary outcome was local failure, as per SPINO recommendations, and secondary outcomes included patterns of failure, toxicities. Clinical and tumor factors were reported with descriptive statistics. The cumulative risk of local failure was estimated using the Fine-Gray method, accounting for death before local failure as a competing risk. A total of 24/605 patients and 31/1412 segments within the database were treated to the posterior elements only. Local failure occurred in 11/31 segments. The cumulative rate of local recurrence was 9.7% at 12 months and 30.8% at 24 months. Amongst local failures, the most common histologies were renal cell carcinoma (36.4%) and non-small cell lung cancer (36.4%). At baseline, 4/11 (36.4%) segments with local failure (36.4%) had epidural disease and 8/11 (72.7%) had paraspinal disease. Most local failures were treated in the de novo setting (8/11, 72.7%). 6/11 (54.5%) failed exclusively within treated CTV sectors and 5/11 (45.5%) with both treated and adjacent untreated sectors. Of these five, four had disease progression within the untreated vertebral body. No failures occurred exclusively within the untreated vertebral body. One patient (4.2%) experienced a grade 4 skin toxicity and one patient (4.2%) developed an iatrogenic Grade 1 vertebral compression fracture. Posterior element alone metastases are rare. Our analyses support SBRT consensus contouring guidelines such that the vertebral body can be excluded from CTV in spinal metastases confined to the posterior elements.

Fracture rate after conventional external beam radiation therapy to the spine in multiple myeloma patients

Background ContextConventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) is used in multiple myeloma (MM) to treat severe pain, spinal cord compression, and disease-related bone disease. However, radiation may be associated with an increased risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), which could substantially impair survival and quality of life. Additionally, the use of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in MM is debated in MM. PurposeTo determine the incidence of VCFs after cEBRT in patients with MM and to assess the applicability of the SINS score in the prediction of VCFs in MM. Study DesignRetrospective multicenter cohort study. Patient SampleMM patients with spinal myeloma lesions who underwent cEBRT between January 2010 and December 2021. Outcome MeasuresFrequency of new or progressed VCFs and subdistribution hazard ratios for potentially associated factors. MethodsPatient and treatment characteristics were manually collected from the patients’ electronic medical records. Computed tomography (CT) scans from before and up to 3 years after the start of radiation were used to score radiographic variables at baseline and at follow-up. Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the SINS score to predict the postradiation VCF rate. ResultsA total of 127 patients with 427 eligible radiated vertebrae were included in this study. The mean age at radiation was 64 years, and 66.1% of them were male. At the start of radiation, 57 patients (44.9%) had at least one VCF. There were 89 preexisting VCFs (18.4% of 483 vertebrae). Overall, 39 of 127 patients (30.7%) reported new fractures (number of vertebrae (n)=12) or showed progression of existing fractures (n=36). This number represented 11.2% of all radiated vertebrae. Five of the 39 (12.8%) patients with new or worsened VCFs received an unplanned secondary treatment (augmentation [n=2] or open surgery [n=3]) within 3 years. Both the total SINS score (SHR 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54–2.03; p<.001) and categorical SINS score (SHR 10.83; 95% CI 4.20–27.94; p<.001) showed an independent association with higher rates of new or progressed VCFs in adjusted analyses. The use of bisphosphonates was independently associated with a lower rate of new or progressed VCFs (SHR 0.47 [95% CI 0.24–0.92; p=.027]). ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that new or progressed VCFs occurred in 30.7% of patients within 3 years, in a total of 11.2% of vertebrae. The SINS score was found to be independently associated with the development or progression of VCFs and could thus be applied in MM for fracture prediction and possibly prevention.

El enfoque de NOMS para los tumores metastásicos: integración de nuevas tecnologías para mejorar los resultados

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: neurological status, Oocologic tumor behavior, mechanical stability and systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

A FIRST REPORT ON OUTCOMES OF STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR POSTERIOR ELEMENT ONLY SPINAL METASTASES AND VALIDATION OF RECOMMENDED CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION PRACTICE

Abstract Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) improves local control and pain response compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy. Consensus stipulates MRI-based delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) and is based on spine segment sector involvement. The applicability to metastases limited to the posterior elements remains to be validated. We aimed to determine the patterns of failure and safety of treating posterior element metastases when the vertebral body (VB) was intentionally excluded from the CTV. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of 605 patients and 1412 spine segments treated with spine SBRT was performed. Only treated segments involving the posterior elements alone were included. The primary outcome was local failure and secondary outcomes included patterns of failure, toxicities. RESULTS: 24/605 patients and 31/1412 segments were treated to the posterior elements only. Local failure occurred in 11/31 segments. The cumulative rate of local recurrence was 9.7% at 12 months and 30.8% at 24 months. Amongst local failures, the most common histologies were renal cell carcinoma (36.4%) and non-small cell lung cancer (36.4%) and 73% had baseline paraspinal disease extension. 6/11 (54.5%) failed exclusively within treated CTV sectors and 5/11 (45.5%) with both treated and adjacent untreated sectors. 4/5 cases had recurrent disease extending into the VB, but no failure was observed exclusively within the VB. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior element alone metastases are rare. Our analyses support SBRT consensus contouring guidelines such that the VB can be excluded from CTV in spinal metastases confined to the posterior elements.