Conventional Elephant Trunk Research Articles

Luminal shape and aortic remodelling after total arch replacement for type A aortic dissection: conventional and frozen elephant trunks.

This study was performed to assess postoperative aortic remodelling (AR) after total arch replacement (TAR) for acute type A aortic dissection (AAD) with a frozen elephant trunk (FET) or conventional elephant trunk (cET). Furthermore, the shape of the residual true lumen (TL) was analyzed based on elliptical Fourier analysis (EFA) and evaluated as a predictor of AR. This study involved patients who underwent TAR with a cET or FET for AAD from December 2006 to January 2023 at five institutions. AR was assessed at the levels of the 4th thoracic vertebra (Th4), Th7, Th10, and above the coeliac trunk. The shape of the residual TL at all four levels was analyzed based on EFA to calculate shape patterns as principal component (PC) values. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed for adjustment between the groups. In total, 180 patients (88 with cET and 92 with FET) were enrolled. The complete AR rate, defined as false lumen remodelling throughout the entire descending thoracic aorta, was significantly higher in the FET than cET group (63.4% vs 32.0%, P = 0.0013). The IPTW-adjusted Fine-Gray regression model revealed that the mean PC2 (hazard ratio, 0.22; P < 0.001) and PC3 (hazard ratio, 0.24; P = 0.009) of the four levels were independent predictors of complete AR. In AAD repair, the AR rate was significantly higher with use of the FET than cET. The shape patterns of the residual TL can be an important reference for predicting postoperative AR.

Two-stage hybrid surgical repair for aortic arch pathology with a shaggy aorta: a case report

BackgroundThe surgical treatment strategy for aortic arch pathology with a shaggy aorta must be determined on a case-by-case basis because of the risk of catastrophic complications, such as brain infarction and spinal cord injury.Case presentationThis report describes the surgical case of two saccular aneurysms of the arch and abdominal aorta associated with a shaggy aorta in a 63-year-old man who underwent total arch replacement and secondary thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Considering the risk of embolization during endovascular therapy, graft replacement for the abdominal aortic aneurysm was initially performed. On postoperative day 28, total arch replacement with the conventional elephant trunk was performed using the functional brain isolation technique, which involves manipulating places far from the atherosclerotic burden, such as arterial inflow for cardiopulmonary bypass and unclamping of neck vessels. On postoperative day 7 after total arch replacement, thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed across the conventional elephant trunk in the nondiseased descending aorta. No postoperative complications, such as cerebrovascular failure, paraplegia, or embolization to abdominal viscera or lower extremities, occurred. The patient remained asymptomatic.ConclusionsThe present case suggests that total arch replacement with the conventional elephant trunk and secondary thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be an effective alternative for aortic arch pathology with a shaggy aorta. The strategy for surgical treatment in patients with aortic arch pathologies with a shaggy aorta must be judged on a case-by-case basis, considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, and preoperative evaluation using transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography angiography, to eliminate potential determinants of intraoperative stroke.

The Fate of Conventional Elephant Trunk in the Frozen Elephant Trunk Era.

Conventional elephant trunk (cET) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) are two distinct approaches to the surgical treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. With the advent and growing uptake of endovascular technologies, FET is becoming increasingly popular for its potential to be performed as a single-stage operation with better aortic remodeling and less risk of graft kinking than the traditional two-stage cET procedure. However, FET has been associated with a higher risk of spinal cord ischemia and its use in patients with connective tissue disorder remains controversial. The current review aimed to reflect on recent evidence surrounding the application of cET and FET to different types of aortic pathology in both acute and elective settings. Another scope of this review was to compare the characteristics of the currently available FET commercial devices on the global market. Our findings highlight that when the pathology is confined to the proximal descending aorta, such as in Dsine, intervention is often single-staged and false lumen (FL) thrombosis is achieved with good effect. FET remains limited by spinal cord injury and applicability in patients with connective tissue disorder, although some groups have started to circumvent associated complications, likely due to growing surgical expertise. Many other aortic diseases do require second-stage intervention, and even in these cases, there appears to be lower in-hospital mortality when using FET over cET. This is possibly due to the higher rate of endovascular completion facilitated by the completed landing zones created during FET. FET is trending toward becoming the universal treatment modality for extending repair to the descending aorta.

Impact of Frozen and Conventional Elephant Trunk on Aortic New-Onset Thrombus and Inflammatory Response.

(1) Aim: The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the impact of frozen elephant trunk (FET) and conventional elephant trunk (CET) on aortic mural thrombus. The secondary endpoint was to investigate the incidence of persistent inflammatory response (IR) in the form of post-implantation syndrome (PIS) or persistent fever without infection focus after FET and CET, respectively, as well as the risk factors associated with its occurrence. (2) Methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational study of 57 consecutive patients treated with FET and CET between April 2015 and June 2020 was performed. Demographics, procedural data, perioperative laboratory exams as well as vital parameters were recorded. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography angiography (CTA) scans were analyzed with a dedicated software. IR was defined as the presence of continuous fever (>38°, lasting > 24 h) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count > 12 × 1000/µL) developing after surgery in the absence of an infection focus. (3) Results: Fifty-seven consecutive patients (mean age 58.4 ± 12.6 years, 36.8% females) treated with FET (66.6%) or CET (33.3%) for acute aortic dissection (56.1%), post-dissection-aneurysm (19.2%) or aortic aneurysm (24.5%) were included. The median thrombus volume on CTA preoperatively was 10.1 cm3 (range 2–408 cm3). After surgery, the median new-onset mural thrombus was 9.7 cm3 (range 0.2–376 cm3). Nineteen (33.3%) patients developed IR; patients with IR were significantly younger (p = 0.027), less frequently of female gender (p = 0.003) and more frequently affected from acute dissection (p = 0.002) and stayed in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly longer (p = 0.033) than those without IR. Postoperatively, the volume of new-onset thrombus was significantly greater in the IR group (84.4 vs. 3.2 cm3, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: In the context of CET and FET, the persistent inflammatory response occurred in 33.3% of the patients with persistent fever without infection focus. IR was associated with a higher volume of new-onset thrombus and significantly prolonged ICU stay. Further studies to investigate these observations are needed.

The frozen elephant trunk procedure: indications, outcomes and future directions.

The treatment of complex multi-segment disease concomitantly affecting the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta is technically challenging. Until the 1990s, such extensive pathology was addressed by median sternotomy for aortic arch replacement followed by a traumatic thoraco-abdominal incision for reconstruction of the descending aorta as a single- or two-stage procedure. The advent of the conventional elephant trunk procedure by Borst in 1983 simplified the second-stage of this procedure by eliminating the need for clamping of the descending thoracic aorta. However, graft-related complications and the considerable inter-stage mortality were significant limitations associated with the conventional elephant trunk procedure. The emergence of endovascular technology and availability of dedicated arch prostheses culminated in a major paradigm change with the introduction of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) concept by Kato and colleagues in the mid-1990s. This one-stage procedure permits concurrent total aortic arch replacement with antegrade delivery of a descending aortic stent-graft which itself functions as a proximal landing zone to facilitate prospective endovascular intervention to treat residual or de novo disease in the more distal aorta. The frozen elephant technique has been applied extensively in acute aortic dissection to restore true lumen patency, occlude descending aortic intimal tears and promote false lumen thrombosis, as well as for chronic degenerative arch aneurysms. The Thoraflex Hybrid and E-vita Open are the two most common commercially available hybrid FET prostheses. This review aims to discuss the development, indications, surgical technique, currently available prostheses, clinical outcomes and future directions regarding the FET procedure.

Mortality and neurologic complications after repair of aortic arch pathology with elephant trunk procedures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique was developed as an alternative to the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for the repair of complex aortic arch pathology. However, short term results between these different procedures are sparsely described. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare short term outcomes between FET and cET in the repair of aortic arch pathology. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies comparing performance of FET and cET procedures in patients with aortic arch pathology. The primary outcome of interest was early mortality, defined as 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, and spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Meta-analysis utilizing the random-effects model was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software, version 5.4. Ten studies, comprising 1481 patients with aortic arch pathology, were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant reduction of early mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.97) in the FET group. For neurologic outcomes, no significant differences were noted in stroke risk between both groups (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.83-1.75), but an increased risk of SCI was present in FET patients (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.05-4.10). FET appears to be associated with a significant lower early mortality, at costs of greater SCI risk. Larger studies are needed to provide confident recommendations towards preferential use of either procedure.

The great vessel freeze-out: A meta-analysis of conventional versus frozen elephant trunks in aortic arch surgery.

BackgroundThe optimal treatment strategy for complex aortic arch and proximal descending aortic pathologies remains controversial. Despite the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique's increasing popularity, its use over the conventional elephant trunk (CET) remains a matter of physician preference and outcomes are varied.MethodsThis meta‐analysis of available comparative studies of FET versus CET sought to examine differences in survival, reintervention, and adverse events. The following databases were searched from inception—May 2020: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Studies retrieved were then screened for eligibility against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria with a protocol registered on Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/hrfze/.ResultsThe search identified 1911 citations, with five studies included. The resultant meta‐analysis included 313 CET and 292 FET cases. FET had lower perioperative mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.42; 0.60], p < .001) and improved 1‐year survival compared to CET (hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% CI: [0.42; 0.95], p = .03). There were no significant differences in rates of overall or open reinterventions following FET versus CET, but FET did yield a significantly higher rate of endovascular reintervention (RR: 2.32, 95% CI: [1.17; 4.61], p = .03). No significant differences were observed in the incidences of postoperative stroke, spinal cord injury, or renal failure between groups.ConclusionsThe FET technique yields superior rates of perioperative and medium‐term survival with no significant increase in overall reinterventions. There was no significant difference in the rate of spinal cord injury between groups, providing further large‐scale evidence that the FET is an acceptable, safe alternative to the CET.

"Why is frozen elephant trunk better than classical elephant trunk?"

The treatment of complex aortic arch disease, in chronic or acute setting, has always represented a fascinating challenge for the heart surgeon also because, often, the involvement of the aortic arch is associated with a simultaneous involvement of the ascending aorta and of the proximal portion of the descending thoracic aorta. In recent years, there have been many surgical and/or endovascular techniques and approaches in a single step or multiple steps proposed with the aim of treating and simplifying these complex conditions. The first procedure available for this purpose was the conventional elephant trunk technique, proposed by the German surgeon Hans Borst, back in 1983. In the following years, the technique has undergone modifications, up to what is nowadays considered its most modern evolution, represented by the frozen elephant trunk which allows managing the proximal descending thoracic aorta using the antegrade release of a self-expandable stent graft. In this review article, we try to analyze the advantages and drawbacks of both techniques from clinical and practical points of view.

How Will the Elephant Trunk Technique Evolve in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair?

Since Dr Borst first introduced the elephant trunk (ET) procedure for repair of extensive aortic aneurysms in 1982, this approach has undergone several technical modifications and achieved improved surgical outcomes during the past 4 decades. However, with the advent of endovascular and hybrid therapies, especially the spread of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique, the role of the conventional ET technique in the repair of diffuse aortic aneurysms has been obfuscated with constant doubts and questions.

Total Aortic Arch Replacements With a 4 Branched Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) Graft in Acute Aortic Dissection (DeBakey type I)

Total Aortic Arch Replacements With a 4 Branched Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) Graft in Acute Aortic Dissection (DeBakey type I)

Short- and mid-term outcomes of the frozen elephant-trunk procedure for degenerative aortic arch aneurysm.

The frozen elephant-trunk (FET) procedure is used widely in total aortic arch replacement (TAR) surgery; however, its safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes compared with those of the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for degenerative aneurysms are unclear. Between July, 2011 and August, 2019, 126 patients underwent elective total aortic arch replacement at our institution. We compared the short- and mid-term outcomes of 60 patients who underwent the FET procedure (FET group) with those of 66 patients who underwent cET (cET group). The in-hospital mortality rate tended to be lower in the FET group than in the cET group (p = 0.12). There were two cases of paraplegia (3.3%) in the FET group and in none in the cET group. The all-cause mortality at the 3-year follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.31). The FET group required more unexpected interventions at the surgical site in the mid-term period. FET was associated with a shorter operative time and lower surgical mortality than cET. Although the mid-term total aortic arch replacement outcomes of FET were acceptable, careful imaging observation is necessary because reinterventions were required more frequently.

Frozen Elephant Trunk for Aortic Arch Reconstruction is Associated with Reduced Mortality as Compared to Conventional Techniques

To examine the perioperative outcomes following aortic arch repair using frozen elephant trunk (FET) vs conventional elephant trunk (ET) techniques. Between 2002 and 2018, 390 patients underwent aortic repair with elephant trunk reconstruction at 9 centers: 172 patients received a FET (mean age: 65+/-13 years, 30% female, 37% aortic dissection) and 218 patients received an ET (mean age: 63+/-13 years, 37% female, 43% aortic dissection). Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality; stroke; and spinal cord injury (SCI). In-hospital mortality rate was 11% (n = 43) overall, 9% (n = 15) for FET and 13% (n = 28) for ET. Post-operative stroke occurred in 13% (n = 49) overall, 13% (n = 22) for FET and 12% (n = 27) for ET. The rate of post-operative SCI was 3% (n = 13) overall, 5.0% (n = 9) for FET and 2.0% (n = 4) for ET. When compared to ET, the propensity score analysis confirmed FET to be associated with lower mortality (adjusted risk difference -7.0% (95% CI -13.0 to -1.0), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the propensity score-adjusted risk difference for stroke between FET and ET (-0.7%, 95% CI -7.4% to 6.1%, P = 0.85), nor for SCI (3.3%, 95% CI -0.4% to 7.0%, P = 0.085) On multivariable analysis, FET was associated with lower odds of mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.95, P = 0.04), and had similar odds of stroke (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.41-1.70, P = 0.62) and SCI (OR 2.83, 95% CI 0.83-9.60, P = 0.1). FET repair is associated with lower in-hospital mortality as compared to conventional ET, and results in similar risk of stroke and spinal cord injury. Further investigation is warranted.

Methods and Results of the Brain and Visceral Organs Protection During the Correction of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch Aneurysm or Isolated Aortic Arch Aneurism

The ascending aorta and aortic arch aneurysm surgical correction is the most difficult problem of cardiovascular surgery due to the necessity of management of the main disease and adequate protection of the brain and visceral organs.&#x0D; The aim. To present the methods and results of protection of the central nervous system and visceral organs during the correction of the ascending aorta and aortic arch aneurysm or isolated aortic arch aneurism.&#x0D; Materials and methods. During 1994–2018, we operated 419 patients with the ascending aorta and aortic arch aneurysm (or isolated aortic arch aneurism).&#x0D; Diagnosis of aneurysms was based on clinical data, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, X-ray examination, aortography.&#x0D; All operations were performed under general anesthesia, through the median sternotomy using cardiopulmonary bypass. Valve-sparing technique with aortic valve resuspension/aortic valve plasty and semi-arch/arch replacement was used in 288/9 (68.7%) patients. Bentall operation with semi-arch/arch replacement was used in 86/9 (20.5%) patients. Other operations accounted for 45 (10.7%) patients.&#x0D; Results. The history of the development of aortic aneurysms treatment options is briefly overviewed in the paper. Diagnostic methods are mentioned, but the main method today is computed tomography. Initial status of the patients was severe. All operations were performed through median sternotomy using cardiopulmonary bypass. The following techniques were used for surgical treatment of aneurysms: 1) valve-sparing technique with aortic valve resuspension/ plasty and semi-arc/arch replacement was used in 288/9 (68.7%) patients. In this group there were 8 Yacoub operations, 6 David operations. In 7 patients, plication of one of the leaflets was performed in case of aortic valve prolapse. 3 patients underwent strengthening of the free edge of the leaflets and 4 patients underwent plasty by the patch in case of leaflet fenestrations; 2) Bentall operation with semi-arch/arch replacement was used in 86/9 (20.5%); 3) others: isolated arch in 15 (3.6%); Wheat operation + arch in 9 (1.0%); aortic arch plasty in 4 (1.0%); Elephant trunk (conventional Elephant trunk) + TEVAR was used in 17 (4.1%) patients. The brain protection was performed differently at each of the two stages in our surgical experience. The best result was achieved at the last stage. The number of postoperative complications decreased from 34.4% to 8.4% and hospital mortality from 17.2% to 5.3%, respectively. Also, a modern endovascular method – hybrid operations Elephant trunk + TEVAR – was used in 17 (4.1%) patients with good immediate result.&#x0D; Conclusions.&#x0D; 1. At type A aortic dissection (DeBakey type I) the operation of choice is supracoronary ascending aortic replacement with a semi-arch (arch) replacement of the aorta.&#x0D; 2. Accumulation of surgical experience, team training, improvement of methods of protection of the brain and visceral organs allowed to reduce the number of postoperative complications from 34.4% to 8.4% and hospital mortality from 17.2% to 5.3%.

The frozen elephant trunk technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection: preliminary results.

Our goal was to determine the early and midterm outcomes after total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique compared to those of the conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 49 patients had total arch replacement for acute retrograde type A aortic dissection. Patients were divided into the conventional ET (n = 17) and FET (n = 32) groups. The false lumen status was evaluated using enhanced computed tomography (CT) 1 week postoperatively. The diameter of the downstream aorta was evaluated annually using CT. The median follow-up period was 29 months. Preoperative data and neurological complications were not significantly different in the 2 groups. The diameter and length of the ET prosthesis were significantly larger and longer in the FET group. The overall early mortality rate was 10.2% (5/49) with no differences between the 2 groups. The mean follow-up period was significantly longer in the conventional ET group. The rates of freedom from aortic events at 3 years were significantly lower in the FET group. At the level of the distal arch, postoperative false lumen patency was significantly lower and the follow-up aortic diameter was significantly smaller in the FET group. The FET technique facilitates false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodelling at the distal arch level, with fewer adverse aortic events during the follow-up period with acceptable early outcomes; however, these findings are exploratory and require investigation.

Minimally Invasive Aortic Arch Repair: Technical Considerations and Mid-Term Outcomes.

Reports of minimal invasive aortic arch surgery are scarce. We reviewed our experience with minimal access aortic arch surgery performed through an upper mini-sternotomy, with emphasis on details of operative technique and early and mid-term outcomes. The medical records of 123 adult patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years), who underwent primary elective minimal access aortic arch surgery in two aortic referral centers, were reviewed. The most common indication was degenerative aortic arch aneurysm in 92 (75%) patients. Standard operative and organ protection techniques used in all patients were upper mini-sternotomy, uninterrupted antegrade cerebral perfusion, and moderate systemic hypothermia (27.4 ± 1°C). Sixty-eight (55%) patients received partial aortic arch replacement; the remaining 55 (45%) patients received total arch replacement, further extended with either a frozen elephant trunk in 43 (35%) patients or a conventional elephant trunk procedure in nine (7%) patients. No conversion to full sternotomy was required. New permanent renal failure occurred in one (0.8%) patient, stroke in two (1.6%), and spinal cord injury in four (3.3%) patients. Early mortality was observed in four (3.3%) patients. At five years, survival was 80 ± 6% and freedom from reoperation was 96 ± 3%. Minimal invasive aortic arch repair through an upper mini-sternotomy can be safely performed, with early and mid-term outcomes well comparable to series performed through a standard median sternotomy.

One-stage aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection: using a Vasoring and a conventional elephant trunk graft.

We used a vascular ring connector (Vasoring) and a conventional elephant trunk graft for complete repair in open surgery for type A aortic dissection. This report described the immediate and mid-term results of this new technique. We used a rigid titanic ring as a stent in the vascular graft for rapid sutureless anastomosis in the reconstruction of type A aortic dissection. A total of 65 consecutive patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent open surgery performed by a single surgeon from November 2007 to February 2017. All patients underwent aortic reconstruction with vascular grafts and Vasorings (21 patients in the ascending aorta and 44 patients in the total aortic arch). For total aortic arch replacement, we implanted the conventional vascular graft in the proximal descending thoracic aorta as an elephant trunk graft. Concomitant procedures included the Bentall procedure (9 patients), the David operation (6 patients), coronary artery bypass grafting (9 patients), heart transplantation (1 patient), mitral valve replacement (2 patients) and endovascular aortic repair (1 patient). The mean duration of postoperative endotracheal intubation was 17.0 ± 11.8 h. The average blood loss was 520 ± 743 ml, and 25% of patients required no blood transfusion. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6%. The combined use of the vascular ring connector and the conventional elephant trunk graft may reduce bleeding and pump time, stop the blood flow in the false lumen and allow the 1-stage total arch replacement to be performed safely. The conventional elephant trunk graft is free from stent graft-induced new entry.

Total aortic arch replacement using elephant trunk or frozen elephant trunk technique: a case-control matching study.

Surgical management of aortic arch diseases is one of the most challenging issues in cardiovascular surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome after frozen elephant trunk (FET) with conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique. Out of a total of 551 patients after thoracic aortic surgery, we analyzed 70 consecutive patients, who underwent aortic arch replacement with ET or FET technique between 2001 and 2017 in our institution. The patients were case-control matched in regard to such variables as age, sex, presence of an acute aortic dissection and necessity for concomitant procedures. The analysis included 25 patient pairs. Among the 25 FET patients, eleven patients were female, the median age was 69, 15 (60%) patients had an aortic dissection and thirteen needed various concomitant procedures. In the second group, treated with conventional ET technique, 10 (40%) patients were female, the median age was 66 years, thirteen presented with an aortic dissection and 16 (64%) underwent concomitant procedures. These and other characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. In-hospital mortality was statistically similar: 5 (20%) in the FET group vs. 8 (32%) for ET group (P=0.52). The incidence of stroke, acute renal failure and postoperative bleeding was comparable. The length of stay in the intensive care unit did not differ between the cohorts (P=0.258). Predictors of in-hospital mortality were length of the operation, bleeding postoperatively, and acute renal failure. The one-year survival rates were higher in the FET cohort compared to the conventional approach (60% vs. 38%), however without statistical significance. In regard to the short- and mid-term outcome, there were only slight differences between both techniques. In patients with extensive aneurysmal aortic disease, conventional ET and FET procedures seem to be associated with acceptable satisfactory mid-term outcome.

OC51 NEW TECHNIQUE IN TYPE I ACUTE AORTIC DISSECTION FOR ARCH STABILIZATION AND FUTURE LANDING ZONE CREATION WITHOUT ARCH REPLACEMENT: THE SALERNO CANOE TECHNIQUE

Background and Aim: We present a simplified elephant trunk procedure to treat type I acute aortic dissections. This technique transfers the anastomotic site of a modified elephant trunk prosthesis from zone 3 to zone 0 (before anonymous trunk). Methods: From November 2015 to April 2018, 38 patients underwent an ascending aorta replacement for type I acute aortic dissection. In order to stabilize the arch and prepare a future landing zone, after the reconstruction of proximal and distal dissected aortic walls using inside and outside felt strips, we introduce into the aortic arch a Dacron prosthesis resected to create a “fenestration” under the supra-aortic branch vessels. The distal part of this prosthesis is left free floating into the descending aorta. The concave arch was also anchored to the prosthesis and through a catheter placed distally into the tube graft we perfused the thoracic aorta. Having the prosthesis a final shape of a canoe, we named the procedure “the Salerno Canoe Technique”. Results: Five patients died (13.2%). We observed a 5% reduction compared to our previous mortality. In one patient severe abdominal hypoperfusion due to secondary hypertensive false lumen was successful treated by an endovascular thoracic prosthesis landed proximally into the “canoe prosthesis”. Conclusions: Compared to conventional elephant trunk technique this procedure is simpler and less circulatory arrest time-consuming (only mean 12 min increase respect to ascending aorta replacement alone). It allows an extensive arch stabilization, a safe perfusion of the descending thoracic aorta and a landing zone for future endovascular procedures.

Single-centre experience with the frozen elephant trunk technique in 251 patients over 15 years†

Our goal was to present our 15-year experience (2001-2015) with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique. A total of 251 patients (82 with aortic aneurysms, 96 with acute aortic dissection type A, 4 with acute type B dissections, 52 with chronic aortic dissection type A, 17 with chronic type B dissection and 67 redo cases) underwent FET implantation with either the custom-made Chavan-Haverich (n = 66), the Jotec E-vita (n = 31) or the Vascutek Thoraflex hybrid (n = 154) prosthesis. The cases were assigned to an early period (2001-2011) and a contemporary period (2012-present). Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, circulatory arrest time and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time were 241 ± 72, 125 ± 59, 56 ± 30 and 81 ± 34 min, respectively. Incidence of rethoracotomy for bleeding, stroke, spinal cord injury, prolonged ventilatory support (>96 h) and long-term dialysis were 18, 14, 2, 24 and 2%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 11% (in acute aortic dissection type A, 12%). Of the 2 patients with graft infections, 1 died and the other had a protracted hospital stay. There were 49 second-stage procedures in the downstream aorta: either open surgical [n = 25 (thoraco-abdominal, n = 15; descending, n = 6; infrarenal, n = 4)] or transfemoral endovascular (n = 23). Elective thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair R implantation was successful in all 23 cases. FET results are comparable with those of the published results of the conventional elephant trunk technique. FET is an ideal landing zone for subsequent transfemoral endovascular completion. Patients with graft infections may have dismal results.

Hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysms: a comprehensive review.

Open total arch replacement (TAR) has become safer with refinements in cerebral protection techniques. The frequent extension of aortic arch aneurysms into the descending thoracic aorta customarily requires a two-staged conventional elephant trunk procedure, carrying relatively high mortality and morbidity risks and high rates of rupture in the interval between the two open surgeries. The technical demands and invasive nature of TAR has therefore precluded many high-risk patients from being surgical candidates for aneurysm repair. As a result, hybrid techniques and approaches to the aortic arch have become common since the adoption of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and advancement in the commercial grafts that are available. The results of hybrid aortic arch repairs have been encouraging, though with higher rates of re-interventions than TAR and variable reported rates of stroke and spinal cord ischemia. The aim of this publication is to review the current literature on hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysms.