Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Research Articles

Inflammation and platelet reactivity during adjunctive colchicine versus aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitor

BackgroundIn patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the use of anti-inflammatory therapy with colchicine is associated with a reduction of recurrent ischemic events. The mechanisms of such findings are not fully elucidated.ObjectivesTo investigate the effects of colchicine versus aspirin on inflammation and platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI.MethodsThis observational study compared laboratory measurements in ACS patients receiving single antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor or prasugrel plus colchicine (MACT) (n = 185) versus conventional dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus ticagrelor or prasugrel (n = 497). The primary outcome was the frequency of high residual inflammation, defined as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥2 mg/L at 1 month post-PCI. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed for the primary outcome, including multivariable adjustment, propensity-score matching, and inverse-probability weighted methods.ResultsOne month after PCI, patients treated with MACT had significantly lower levels of hs-CRP compared to those treated with DAPT (0.6 [0.4–1.2] vs. 0.9 [0.6–2.3] mg/L, p < 0.001). The frequency of high residual inflammation was also lower in the MACT group (10.8% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.001) (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.33 [0.20–0.54], p < 0.001). This effect was consistent across sensitivity analyses. There was no difference in platelet reactivity between MACT and DAPT (49.6 ± 49.0 vs. 51.5 ± 66.4 P2Y12 reaction unit [PRU] measured by VerifyNow, p = 0.776).ConclusionIn ACS patients undergoing PCI, MACT was associated with a lower rate of high residual inflammation without increasing platelet reactivity compared to conventional DAPT.Clinical trial registrationNCT04949516 for MACT pilot trial and NCT04650529 for Gyeongsang National University Hospital registry.

Clopidogrel with indobufen or aspirin in minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack: a randomized controlled clinical study

BackgroundIschemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) are the most prevalent cerebrovascular diseases. The conventional antiplatelet drugs are associated with an inherent bleeding risk, while indobufen is a new antiplatelet drug and has the similar mechanism of antiplatelet aggregation as aspirin with more safety profile. However, there have been no studies evaluating the combination therapy of indobufen and clopidogrel for antiplatelet therapy in cerebrovascular diseases.ObjectiveThe CARMIA study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a new dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of indobufen and clopidogrel comparing with the conventional dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA.MethodsAn open-label randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at a clinical center. We randomly assigned patients who had experienced a minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 72 h of onset, or within 1 month if they had intracranial stenosis (IS), to receive either indobufen 100 mg twice daily or aspirin 100 mg once daily for 21 days. For patients with IS, the treatment duration was extended to 3 months. All patients received a loading dose of 300 mg clopidogrel orally on the first day, followed by 75 mg once daily from the second day to 1 year. We collected prospective data using paper-based case report forms, and followed up on enrolled patients was conducted to assess the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA, mRS score, NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score, and any bleeding events occurring within 3 month after onset.ResultsWe enrolled 202 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. After applying the criteria, 182 patients were eligible for data analysis. Endpoint events (recurrence of ischemic stroke/TIA, myocardial infarction, or death) were observed in 6 patients (6.5%) receiving aspirin and clopidogrel, including 4 (4.3%) with stroke recurrence, 1 (1.1%) with TIA recurrence, and 1 (1%) with death. In contrast, no endpoint events were reported in the indobufen and clopidogrel group (P = 0.029). The group of patients receiving indobufen and clopidogrel exhibited significantly lower modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) compared to the aspirin and clopidogrel group (common odds ratio 3.629, 95% CI 1.874–7.036, P < 0.0001). Although the improvement rate of NIHSS score in the indobufen and clopidogrel group was higher than that in the aspirin and clopidogrel group, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Bleeding events were observed in 8 patients (8.6%) receiving aspirin and clopidogrel, including 4 (4.3%) with skin bleeding, 2 (2.2%) with gingival bleeding, 1 (1.1%) with gastrointestinal bleeding, and 1 (1.1%) with urinary system bleeding. On the other hand, only 1 patient (1.1%) in the indobufen and clopidogrel group experienced skin bleeding (P = 0.035).ConclusionThe combination of indobufen and clopidogrel has shown non-inferior and potentially superior effectiveness and safety compared to aspirin combined with clopidogrel in patients with minor ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA in the CARMIA study (registered under chictr.org.cn with registration number ChiCTR2100043087 in 01/02/2021).

Adjunctive cilostazol in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial

Abstract Background/Aims Previous studies showed that triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT), involving the addition of cilostazol to conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin + clopidogrel), has better clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than that with DAT; however, the optimal duration of TAT has not yet been determined. Methods Altogether, 985 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) were prospectively enrolled in 14 medical centers in Korea. We randomly assigned patients into three groups: DAT (aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months), TAT 1M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 1 month), and TAT 6M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for six months). The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as the composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or repeat revascularization. Results The primary endpoint was not different among the three groups (8.8% in the DAT, 11.0% in the TAT 1M, and 11.6% in the TAT 6M; hazard ratio for TAT 1M vs. DAT, 1.302; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.792–2.141; p=0.297; hazard ratio for TAT 6M vs. DAT, 1.358; 95% CI, 0.829–2.225; p=0.225). With in-hospital outcomes, more bleeding events occurred in the TAT group than in the DAT group (1.3% vs. 4.7% vs. 2.6%, p=0.029) without significant differences in major bleeding. Besides, the TAT groups had higher incidence of headache (0% vs. 1.6% vs. 2.6%, p=0.020). Conclusions The addition of cilostazol to the DAT did not reduce the incidence of 1-year MACE compared to that with DAT alone. Instead, it may be associated with an increased risk of cumbersome side effects such as in-hospital bleeding and headaches.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

It remains unknown whether the recent trend of short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy can simply be applied to patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. conventional DAPT in patients undergoing complex PCI and non-complex PCI (PROSPERO: CRD42022335723). Primary endpoint was the 1-year Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE). Among 5,323 screened studies, six randomized trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria. A total of 10,588 complex PCI patients (5,269 vs. 5,319 patients) and 25,618 non-complex PCI patients (12,820 vs 12,798 patients) were randomly assigned to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. conventional DAPT. In complex PCI patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of NACE than conventional DAPT [Odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63–0.91, P = 0.003], whereas in non-complex PCI patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a trend toward lowering the risk of NACE (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72–1.02, P = 0.09). This meta-analysis across randomized trials demonstrated that a strategy of short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduces the risk of 1-year NACE in patients undergoing complex PCI.

De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis.

Conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention comprises aspirin with a potent P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2Y12) inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) for 12 months. Although this approach reduces ischaemic risk, patients are exposed to a substantial risk of bleeding. Strategies to reduce bleeding include de-escalation of DAPT intensity (downgrading from potent P2Y12 inhibitor at conventional doses to either clopidogrel or reduced-dose prasugrel) or abbreviation of DAPT duration. Either strategy requires assessment of the ischaemic and bleeding risks of each individual. De-escalation of DAPT intensity can reduce bleeding without increasing ischaemic events and can be guided by platelet function testing or genotyping. Abbreviation of DAPT duration after 1-6 months, followed by monotherapy with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor, reduces bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients at high bleeding risk, particularly those without high ischaemic risk. However, these two strategies have not yet been compared in a head-to-head clinical trial. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the evidence base for these treatment approaches, provide guidance on the assessment of ischaemic and bleeding risks, and provide consensus statements from an international panel of experts to help clinicians to optimize these DAPT approaches for individual patients to improve outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based triple antiplatelet therapy compared with clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial

Previous studies reported that compared to conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT; aspirin+clopidogrel), triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT), involving the addition of cilostazol to DAT, had better clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the optimal duration of TAT is yet to be determined. In total, 985 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) were prospectively enrolled in 15 PCI centers in South Korea and China. We randomly assigned patients into 3 groups: DAT (aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months), TAT 1M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 1 month), and TAT 6M (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol for 6 months). The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. The primary endpoint did not differ among the 3 groups (8.8% in DAT, 11.0% in TAT 1M, and 11.6% in TAT 6M; hazard ratio for TAT 1M vs DAT, 1.302; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.792-2.141; P=.297; hazard ratio for TAT 6M vs DAT, 1.358; 95% CI, 0.829-2.225; P=.225). With respect to in-hospital outcomes, more bleeding events occurred in the TAT group than in the DAT group (1.3% vs 4.7% vs 2.6%, P=.029), with no significant differences in major bleeding events. Additionally, the TAT group had a higher incidence of headaches (0% vs 1.6% vs 2.6%, P=.020). The addition of cilostazol to DAT did not reduce the incidence of 1-year MACEs compared with DAT alone. Instead, it may be associated with an increased risk of drug intolerance and side effects, including in-hospital bleeding and headaches.

Adjunctive Cilostazol in Patients With High Residual Platelet Reactivity After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center, Prospective Study (ADJUST-HPR).

Cilostazol as an adjunct to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) postcoronary stenting may further reduce vascular occlusion risks. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of cilostazol on high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients undergoing drug-eluting coronary stent implantation. In a randomized, open-label, single-center, prospective study, the degree of platelet inhibition by cilostazol 100 mg twice daily was assessed on top of conventional DAPT compared with standard clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin combination in poststent patients with HRPR. HRPR was defined as P2Y12 units (PRU) > 240 as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. In addition, the platelet activity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and Multiplate electrode analyzer (MEA). The total of 148 patients were screened, and HRPR was observed in 64 (43.2%). Those were randomized for DAPT versus triple therapy (TAPT). After 30 days, TAPT group exhibited significantly lower rate of HRPR when assessed by all 3 devices (VerifyNow: 40.0 vs. 66.7% P = 0.04, LTA: 6.7 vs. 30.0% P = 0.02, MEA: 10.0 vs. 30.0% P = 0.05 L all vs. DAPT). Also, higher absolute mean difference in TAPT versus DAPT group after 30 days (VerifyNow: 71.3 ± 38.2 vs. 24.6 ± 40.2 P < 0.001, LTA: 23.9 ± 15.1 vs. 9.4 ± 11.8 P < 0.001, MEA: 9.3 ± 12.9 vs. 2.4 ± 17.3 P = 0.08) was observed. Cilostazol in addition to standard DAPT reduces the incidence of HRPR and diminishes further platelet activity in poststent patients. Whether this favorable laboratory finding will affect clinical outcomes requires an adequately powered randomized trial.

Efficacy and safety of low dose aspirin plus clopidogrel in the treatment of elderly patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.

As one of the most common causes of stroke, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (sICAS) is a great threat to public health, and its financial burden is substantial, with annual direct high medical costs particularly in China. Currently, the long-term use of conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as the primary modality of treatment for sICAS decreases the risk of stroke recurrence but increases the risk of bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose aspirin plus clopidogrel for the treatment of sICAS in the elderly population. This randomized, controlled study included 181 older patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke (IS) attributed to sICAS, who were recruited between April 2015 and November 2020. The 90 patients assigned to the low dose therapy group included aspirin, 75 mg, plus clopidogrel, 50 mg, daily for 90 and 91 patients assigned to the conventional group included aspirin, 100 mg, plus clopidogrel, 75 mg, daily for 90 days (aspirin or clopidogrel alone daily thereafter) were included in this intention-to-treat analysis. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in this trial. One hundred eighty-one eligible elderly patients with sICAS were enrolled in this trial. The median age was 70 years ranged 60-83 years. Seventy-five participants were with TIA and 106 with IS. The median time of follow-up was 30 months ranged 1-36 months. Ninety patients were assigned randomly to the low dose group and 91 patients to the conventional group. The rate of primary, secondary and composite efficacy were not significantly different between the low dose and conventional group (P > 0.05). The rate of composite safety outcome was 7.8% (7/90) in the low dose group, which was lower than 17.6% (16/91) in the conventional group (χ2 = 3.921, P = 0.048). At the time of last follow-up, 17 (9.4%) of 181 patients developed GI injuries, which occurred in four (4.4%) of 90 patients in the low dose group and in 13 (14.3%) of 91 patients in the conventional group (χ2 = 4.058, P = 0.044). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in six (18.2%) of 33 patients with severe sICAS and in 22 (38.6%) of 57 patients with moderate sICAS (χ2 = 4.064, P = 0.044) in the low dose group. In this study, the safety of low dose aspirin combined with clopidogrel proved to be equally efficient and significantly safer than those of conventional dose within 24 months in elderly patients with sICAS. However, the small size of this study limits the validity of the results. Further larger longitudinal and randomized controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the role of low dose DAPT in the patients with sICAS.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a feasible alternative treatment for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the modern era. Clinical trials have shown that it could lower the risk of bleeding complications without increased ischemic events as compared to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, the efficacy and safety of this novel approach among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are controversial because they have a much higher risk for recurrent ischemic events. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel approach among patients with ACS. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with 12-month DAPT in ACS patients who underwent PCI with stent implantation. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other three websites were searched for data from the earliest report to July 2022. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding events. The secondary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 21,034 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The quantitative analysis showed a significant reduction in major or minor bleeding events in patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy as compared with standard DAPT(OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46-0.75, p < 0.0001) without increasing the risk of MACCE (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.86-1.13, p = 0.82). The NACE was favorable in the patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.93, p = 0.002). Of note, the overall clinical benefit of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was quite different between ticagrelor and clopidogrel. The incidence of NACE was significantly lower in ticagrelor monotherapy as compared with DAPT (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.91), but not in clopidogrel monotherapy (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.79-1.63). Both clopidogrel and ticagrelor monotherapy showed a similar reduction in bleeding complications (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.94; OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44-0.83, respectively). Although statistically insignificant, the incidence of MACCE was numerically higher in clopidogrel monotherapy as compared with standard DAPT (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.99-2.28, p = 0.06). Based on these findings, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with ticagrelor would be a better choice of medical treatment for ACS patients after PCI with stent implantation in the current era.

Abstract 11472: De-Escalation of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the superiority of treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) uniform de-escalation strategy (i.e., switching from potent P2Y 12 inhibitors to clopidogrel one month after the event). However, it remains unclear if this strategy would be effective in elderly patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the available DAPT strategies, including the uniform de-escalation strategy, in ACS patients older than 65. Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to December 2021 for RCTs or subgroup analyses investigating DAPT strategies for elderly ACS patients (age ≥65 years) and conducted a network meta-analysis. The endpoint was net clinical benefit outcome, defined as a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding. The P-score was used to rank the treatments. Results: Seven RCTs with 5,079 patients were included. The uniform de-escalation strategy was associated with a better net clinical benefit outcome (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [0.41-0.92]) compared with DAPT using potent P2Y 12 inhibitors, and it was similarly effective compared with other DAPT strategies. There was no significant heterogeneity ( I 2 =0%; p =0.82) or inconsistency ( p =0.40). The uniform de-escalation strategy was ranked as the most effective strategy (by P score) superior to DAPT using clopidogrel or low-dose prasugrel. Conclusions: The uniform de-escalation strategy was an effective strategy for older ACS patients. Compared with conventional DAPT using potent P2Y 12 inhibitors, this strategy decreased the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding events.

Indobufen or Aspirin on Top of Clopidogrel After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation (OPTION): A Randomized, Open-Label, End Point-Blinded, Noninferiority Trial.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin as a background therapy has become the standard care after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, some adverse noncardiac effects limited the use of aspirin in clinical practice. Thus, evaluation of pharmacological alternatives to aspirin is attractive. Previous data indicated that indobufen could lessen the unwanted side effects of aspirin while retaining the antithrombotic efficacy, but its combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor still lacks randomized clinical trial evidence. In this randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial, patients with negative cardiac troponin undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either indobufen-based DAPT (indobufen 100 mg twice a day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months) or conventional DAPT (aspirin 100 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d for 12 months). The primary end point was a 1-year composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis, or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. The end points were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee. Between January 11, 2018, and October 12, 2020, 4551 patients were randomized in 103 cardiovascular centers: 2258 patients to the indobufen-based DAPT group and 2293 to the conventional DAPT group. The primary end point occurred in 101 patients (4.47%) in the indobufen-based DAPT group and 140 patients (6.11%) in the conventional DAPT group (absolute difference, -1.63%; Pnoninferiority<0.001; hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94]; P=0.015). Cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and stent thrombosis were observed in 0.13%, 0.40%, 0.80%, and 0.22% of patients in the indobufen-based DAPT group and 0.17%, 0.44%, 0.83%, and 0.17% of patients in the conventional DAPT group (all P>0.05). The occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events was lower in the indobufen-based DAPT group compared with the conventional DAPT group (2.97% versus 4.71%; hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.46-0.85]; P=0.002), with the main decrease in type 2 bleeding (1.68% versus 3.49%; hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.70]; P<0.001). In Chinese patients with negative cardiac troponin undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation, indobufen plus clopidogrel DAPT compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel DAPT significantly reduced the risk of 1-year net clinical outcomes, which was driven mainly by a reduction in bleeding events without an increase in ischemic events. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-IIR-17013505.

De-Escalation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prevail over Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with potent P2Y12 inhibitor is the cornerstone of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management. Balancing the effects of different strategies of antiplatelet therapy including DAPT de-escalation, potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, and conventional DAPT is a hot topic. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase through October 2021 to identify various DAPT strategies in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for treatment of ACS patients after undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES). The network meta-analysis was performed to investigate the net clinic benefit of the DAPT de-escalation, potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, as well as conventional DAPT. The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events, defined as a composite of major bleeding and cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or target-vessel revascularization. The secondary outcomes include major adverse cardiac events and trial-defined major or minor bleeding. Results: A total of 14 RCTs with 63,982 patients were included. The DAPT de-escalation was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome compared with potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (De-escalation vs monotherapy odds ratio (OR): 0.72 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55–0.96), and other antiplatelet strategies (De-escalation vs clopidogrel + aspirin OR: 0.49 95% CI: 0.39–0.63; De-escalation vs prasugrel + aspirin OR: 0.76 95% CI: 0.59–0.98; De-escalation vs ticagrelor + aspirin OR: 0.76 95% CI: 0.55–0.90). There were no statistical differences in the incidence of bleeding (DAPT de-escalation vs P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy OR: 0.73 95% CI: 0.47–1.12) and major adverse cardiac events (DAPT de-escalation vs P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy OR: 0.79 95% CI: 0.59–1.08) between DAPT de-escalation and potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. Conclusions: This network meta-analysis showed that DAPT de-escalation would reduce the net adverse clinical events, compared with potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, for ACS patients undergone PCI treatment.

High-Dose Clopidogrel versus Ticagrelor in CYP2C19 intermediate or poor metabolizers after percutaneous coronary intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

For patients after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), clopidogrel combined with aspirin is a conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) method. Because the genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19gene leads to clopidogrel resistance, guidelines for antiplatelet recommendations in CYP2C19 of ultrarapid metabolizers (UM), extended metabolizers (EM) and poor metabolizers (PM) are clear. However, there is no clear recommendation as to whether ticagrelor or double dose clopidogrel is the best antiplatelet regimen for CYP2C19 of intermediate metabolizers (IM). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor (combined with aspirin) and high-dose clopidogrel (combined with aspirin) in patients after PCI with CYP2C19loss-of-function (LOF) alleles. We searched the following databases to select RCTs of comparing ticagrelor with high-dose clopidogrel in patients after PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles: CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Clinical trials, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), platelet function and TIMI bleeding event were defined as the outcomes. revman 5.3software was used to perform meta-analysis. A total of 14 RCTs with 2351 patients were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed that compared with high-dose clopidogrel, ticagrelor had reduced incidence of MACEs (OR=0.32, 95% Cl: 0.23-0.44, p<0.00001), stent thrombosis (OR: 0.24, 95%CI: 0.13-0.44, p<0.00001), myocardial infarction OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.22-0.80, p=0.008), revascularization (OR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.10-0.82, p=0.02) and unstable angina (OR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.29-0.77, p=0.003) in patients after PCI with CYP2C19 LOF alleles. A subgroup analysis showed that ticagrelor reduced the risk of MACEs compared with high-dose clopidogrel regardless of the type of metabolizer. Compared with high-dose clopidogrel, ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of MACE with longer follow-up period (more than 3months) without increasing the risk of bleeding (OR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.53-1.49, p=0.30), while elevated dyspnoea (OR: 5.62, 95%CI: 3.07-10.28, p<0.00001). For patients carrying CYP2C19 LOF alleles after PCI, ticagrelor may be better than high-dose clopidogrel in reducing the risk of MACEs, while dyspnoea incidents should be alerted.

Abstract 12823: Efficacy, Optimal Duration and Safety of Adjunctive Cilostazol in Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents; a Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label, Phase 4 Trial

Background: Previous studies showed that the triple antiplatelet therapy (TAT) which is an addition of cilostazol on the top of conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT, aspirin + clopidogrel) was associated with better clinical outcomes in ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients as compared with DAPT but the optimal duration of TAT was not determined yet. Method: A total 985 patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) were prospectively enrolled in 14 medical centers in Korea. We randomly assigned patients into 3 groups of DAT (aspiring and clopidogrel) for 12 months, TAT (aspirin, clopidogrel and cilostazol) for 1month or 6months. The primary end point was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, bleeding events and each component of primary end point. Results: The primary end point was not different among the 3 groups (8.4% in the DAT, 11.0% in the TAT for 1month, 11.3% in the TAT for 6 months, p=0.427). However, incidence of cardiac death was significantly higher in TAT groups (0.3% vs 2.5% vs 1.3%, respectively, p=0.047). Regarding in-hospital outcomes, higher bleeding events occurred in TAT groups than DAT group (0.3% vs 3.2% vs 1.9%, p=0.027) without significant difference in major bleeding. Conclusion: TAT strategy with cilostazol on the top of DAT did not associated with reduced incidence of 1-year MACE as compared with DAT but may be associated with increased cardiovascular death and bleeding risk. Whether routine additional use of cilostazol for STEMI patients would be beneficial need further studies with larger study population.

GPVI inhibition by glenzocimab synergistically inhibits atherosclerotic plaque-induced platelet activation when combined with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy

Abstract Introduction Aspirin and a potent platelet P2Y12 inhibitor, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, are not always sufficient to prevent thrombus formation in patients with ST-elevation MI (STEMI), leading to “slow flow” or “no reflow” effects after stenting. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, such as eptifibatide, may help in this setting, but are not used routinely due to their bleeding risk. GPVI has critical roles in thrombosis and a minimal role in haemostasis. Here we tested whether depletion of GPVI has effects on thrombus formation after MI in an animal model and investigated the effects of a novel platelet GPVI inhibitor, glenzocimab (a Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody), on platelet activation and thrombus formation when combined with aspirin and ticagrelor. Methods We used intravital microscopy in a murine model of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ischaemia-reperfusion injury to investigate microvascular thrombosis. We investigated the antithrombotic effects of adding glenzocimab (previously known as ACT017) to blood from healthy donors and 20 patients with ACS treated with aspirin and ticagrelor. We compared the effect of glenzocimab with the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide ex-vivo. We stimulated platelets with collagen and atherosclerotic plaque material that was sourced from patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. We investigated effects on platelet aggregation, spreading, signalling, adhesion, thrombin generation, thrombus formation and clot stability ex vivo. Results Genetic depletion of GPVI in an animal model of myocardial infarction reduced microvascular thrombosis. Ex vivo, aspirin and ticagrelor partially inhibited atherosclerotic plaque-induced platelet aggregation (assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry) by 48% compared to control (34±3 vs. 65±4 U; P&amp;lt;0.001; Figure 1). Atherosclerotic plaque-induced platelet aggregation, adhesion, secretion and activation were critically dependent on platelet GPVI activation and were potently inhibited by glenzocimab. Glenzocimab alone reduced atherosclerotic plaque-induced platelet aggregation by 75% compared to control (16±4 vs. 65±4 U; P&amp;lt;0.001; Figure 1) and by over 95% when combined with aspirin and ticagrelor (3±1 vs 65±4 U; P&amp;lt;0.001; Figure 1). Furthermore, glenzocimab provided multiple synergistic antithrombotic effects when added to the blood of aspirin and ticagrelor-treated patients with ACS ex vivo. Glenzocimab and the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, eptifibatide, had many similar antithrombotic effects but glenzocimab had less effect on mechanisms of general haemostasis compared to eptifibatide, as assessed by ROTEM (Figure 2). Conclusions The addition of glenzocimab to aspirin and ticagrelor provides synergistic inhibition of multiple critical mechanisms of atherothrombosis. Glenzocimab and the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, eptifibatide, share many similar antithrombotic effects, although glenzocimab has less impact on mechanisms involved in haemostasis compared to eptifibatide. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Academy of Medical Sciences UK Clinical Lecturer Starter GrantRoyal Embassy of Saudi Arabia

Clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban combined with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI

Challenges remain for clinicians over balancing the efficacy of active antithrombotic therapy and simultaneous bleeding reduction in patients. The clinical data of 347 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively analyzed. On the basis of the given tirofiban, the patients were assigned into three different dose groups: high dose group (group H), medium dose group (group M), and low dose group (group L). The tirofiban efficacy was evaluated in terms of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) parameters and lab endpoints, including platelet count and function. The tirofiban safety was assessed by the occurrence of bleeding events. The patients were followed up for 1 month after the PCI. No significant difference in MACE events was evident among these groups (p > 0.05). Groups H and M reported an obvious reduction in platelet count (p < 0.05 for both) and an increased platelet inhibition rate (p < 0.05 for both). Group H showed a higher rate of total bleeding events than the other groups (Group H vs. Group M: 34.4% vs. 16.5%; Group H vs. Group L: 34.4% vs. 10.3%; p < 0.05 for both). A proper administration of a low dose of tirofiban may be a superior alternative in treating ACS patients, which can produce a similar favorable clinical outcome and a decrease in bleeding complication.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy versus conventional dual antiplatelet therapy or aspirin monotherapy in acute coronary syndrome

Background and Aims: Controversy remains regarding the optimal antiplatelet therapy regimen in patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and aspirin monotherapy in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

External validation of the GRACE risk score 2.0 in the contemporary all‐comers GLOBAL LEADERS trial

This study aimed to assess the predictive ability of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score 2.0 in contemporary acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, and its relation to antiplatelet strategies. The predictive value of the GRACE risk score in the contemporary ACS cohort and the appropriate antiplatelet regimen according to the risk remain unclear. This is a subgroup analysis of the all-comers, randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial, comparing ticagrelor monotherapy versus conventional dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The GRACE risk score 2.0 with 1-year mortality prediction was implemented. The randomized antiplatelet effect was assessed in predefined three GRACE risk-groups; low-risk (GRACE <109), moderate-risk (GRACE 109-140), and high-risk (GRACE >140). The GRACE risk score was available in 6,594 out of 7,487 ACS patients among whom 1,743, 2,823, and 2,028 patients were classified as low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk, respectively. At 1 year, all-cause mortality occurred in 120 patients (1.8%). The discrimination ability of the GRACE model was moderate (C-statistic=0.742), whereas 1-year mortality risk was overestimated (mean predicted mortality rate: 3.9%; the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square: 21.47; p=0.006). There were no significant interactions between the GRACE risk strata and effects of the ticagrelor monotherapy on ischemic or bleeding outcomes at 1 year compared to the reference strategy. The GRACE risk score 2.0 is valuable in discriminating high risk ACS patients, however, the recalibration of the score is recommended for better risk stratification. There is no significant differences in efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy across the three GRACE risk strata.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials

Controversy remains regarding the optimal antiplatelet regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and aspirin monotherapy in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Data on 4,453 patients were pooled from SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE randomized trials. Antiplatelet therapy regimens were categorized as P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT), conventional DAPT (12-month or longer DAPT), and aspirin monotherapy (aspirin monotherapy after 6-month DAPT). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke). Inverse-probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) analysis was performed. At 1 year, patients in the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy had a comparable risk of MACCE compared with those in the conventional DAPT (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.655; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.393 to 1.094; p = 0.106), and tended to have a lower risk of MACCE than those in the aspirin monotherapy (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.606; 95% CI, 0.347 to 1.058; p = 0.078). The adjusted hazard for the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5 bleeding was significantly lower in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy than in conventional DAPT (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.341; 95% CI, 0.190 to 0.614; p < 0.001) and in aspirin monotherapy (IPTW-adjusted HR, 0.359; 95% CI, 0.182 to 0.708; p = 0.003). In conclusion, among patients with ACS undergoing PCI, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT reduced risk of bleeding compared with conventional DAPT and aspirin monotherapy after 6-month DAPT without increasing MACCE.

1-Year Safety of 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Aspirin or P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitor Monotherapy Using a Bioabsorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent.

This study evaluated the safety of 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after implantation of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) and compared P2Y12inhibitor with aspirin monotherapy 3 months after DAPT.Methods and Results:Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using BP-SES were enrolled and followed for 1 year. Patients with a history of stent thrombosis were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), definite or probable stent thrombosis, and severe bleeding at 12 months. The BP-SES arm of the CENTURY II trial was used as a conventional DAPT group for comparison. After DAPT, patients were maintained on either aspirin (n=846) or a P2Y12inhibitor (n=674 patients).In all, 1,695 patients were enrolled in the study across 65 centers. The primary endpoint occurred in 4.3% of patients at 1 year. After propensity score adjustment, the incidence of the primary endpoint was not inferior in those receiving DAPT for 3 months compared with conventional DAPT (5.5%; Pnon-inferiority<0.0001). The incidence of the primary endpoint and severe bleeding did not differ between the aspirin and P2Y12inhibitor monotherapy groups. After adjustment, 3-month DAPT was not inferior to longer DAPT after BP-SES implantation in terms of net adverse clinical events. There was no difference in bleeding and thrombotic events between P2Y12inhibitor and aspirin monotherapy after 3 months DAPT.