Conventional Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Research Articles

Increased adoption of IL-1 pathway inhibition and the steroid-sparing paradigm shift: temporal trends in recurrent pericarditis treatment from the RESONANCE patient registry

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a chronic autoinflammatory disease mediated by IL-1 that requires long-term treatment. While the 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines position IL-1 pathway inhibition only after corticosteroids, complications associated with long-term steroid use underscore the importance of steroid-sparing strategies. Rilonacept, an IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap, is the only FDA-approved treatment for RP (available since April 2021). RESONANCE, an ongoing 5-year non-interventional US registry of patients (pts) with RP, has collected real-world data from pts cared for by cardiologists with a focus on pericardial disease, with a goal of informing contemporary RP clinical management. Purpose Analysis of temporal trends in RP management from RESONANCE. Methods From a database cut-off (DCO) on 21 December 2023, patient demographics and disease characteristics are reported for 242 active RP pts (excluding RHAPSODY prior participants) at 20 US sites (median [Q1:Q3] 2.1 [1.5:2.6] years and 556 patient-years [PY] of observation). Complete medication class use data were available for 239 pts (total 546 PY). Proportional medication class use prior to initiating rilonacept was analyzed annually across the observation period. Results Mean (standard deviation) age at DCO was 50.2 (16.6) years; 58.1% were female. Median [Q1:Q3] disease duration at DCO from index pericarditis episode was 3.1 [2.2:5] years. Median [Q1:Q3] number of prior recurrences at enrollment was 3 [2:5]. Prior to rilonacept availability, NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin represented the highest proportion of treatment (73% of PY); steroid use was 9% of PY, IL-1 pathway inhibition (anakinra) was 13% of PY, and conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were 0.46% PY (no RP-specific treatment was 5% of PY) (Fig 1). In the years since rilonacept availability, proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use has increased, from 13% of PY in 2020-21 to 26% of PY in 2023, driven by an increase in rilonacept use (6%, 13%, 16% of PY in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively). Over that same period, proportional NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin use (57%-63% of PY) has been consistently 6-times more than proportional steroid use (10%-11% of PY). Among pts who initiated rilonacept (n=81), similar proportions transitioned from NSAIDs/Colchicine/Aspirin as from corticosteroids (Fig 2), a robust trend observed each year. Of those pts transitioning from corticosteroids, 1/3 had used corticosteroids for <30 days and 1/3 for >6 months. Conclusions Real-world data from the RESONANCE registry reveal a temporal shift in RP management in US centers with RP-focused cardiologists, with increased proportional IL-1 pathway inhibition use since rilonacept availability in 2021. Advancing beyond 2015 guideline recommendations, IL-1 pathway inhibition is often being used as steroid-sparing treatment, i.e., after colchicine instead of chronic corticosteroids.

Pregnancy Outcomes from a Multidisciplinary Obstetric-Medicine/Rheumatology Clinic in the United States: A Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.

At Women & Infants Hospital in Providence, Rhode Island, the Specialty Care in Pregnancy clinic combines obstetric-medicine internists with rheumatologists to care for pregnant patients with rheumatologic conditions. These clinics are scarce, with only three known similar clinics in the United States. This study aims to characterize the population cared for in this clinic, identify interventions, and analyze pregnancy outcomes for the birthing parents and newborns. A five-year retrospective chart review was performed from January 1st, 2016, through December 31st, 2021. Of 81 patients, 62% had a clinically diagnosed rheumatic disorder. Of 87 patient visits, which included preconception, prenatal, and postpartum encounters, 54% of patients were taking conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, and 17% were taking biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. New medications were started in 52% of patients. A total of 52% of pregnancies resulted in live births, with 2% resulting in miscarriages. Prematurity occurred in 19% of newborns, and 9% had intrauterine growth restriction. Our study illustrates the benefits of multidisciplinary care in patients with rheumatologic disorders during their prenatal and perinatal periods. The expertise from both the obstetric-medicine internists and rheumatologists was critical in making complex decisions that weighed the benefits of therapy against potential risks for the fetus. Our multidisciplinary approach resulted in doubling of the number of patients initiating disease modifying therapy and increased prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine and/or aspirin therapy, as recommended by current guidelines. Additional multidisciplinary clinics of this type would help coordinate care among physicians who frequently treat these high-risk, unique patients and open the door for more research of this understudied population.

Factors associated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug initiation for rheumatoid arthritis in underserved patient groups in England and Wales, UK: a national cohort study

Quantifying health-care inequality is essential to addressing the imbalance in outcomes attributable to age, sex, race or ethnicity, and multimorbidity. In this study, we analysed differences in the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis within the universal health-care system of England and Wales, UK. An observational cohort study was conducted using the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) dataset. We included all patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were enrolled in NEIAA between May 8, 2018, and April 30, 2022, and who had 12-month follow-up data available. Modified Poisson regression was used to explore factors associated with the initiation of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs within 12 months of initial rheumatology assessment. The factors evaluated included age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (index of multiple deprivation), smoking status, and relevant comorbidities (lung disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and depression). NEIAA is supported by people with lived experience of rheumatoid arthritis, who contributed to study design and the interpretation of findings. 6098 patients in NEIAA had new diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis and available follow-up data. The mean age was 59·2 years (SD 14·9); 3912 (64·2%) patients were women and 2186 (35·8%) were men. 6047 (99·2%) patients had available ethnicity data, of whom 5215 (86·2%) were White, 152 (2·5%) were Black, 478 (7·9%) were Asian, and 202 (3·3%) were of mixed or other ethnicities. 508 (8·3%) of 6098 patients initiated biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs within 12 months. Patients younger than 40 years were more likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than individuals older than 65 years (multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 2·41 [95% CI 1·83-3·19]; p<0·0001). Asian individuals were less likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than White individuals (0·52 [0·36-0·76]; p=0·0007), which persisted after adjustment for socioeconomic status, comorbidities, baseline disease severity, and the initial response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. These differences were evident for Asian women but not Asian men. Black individuals were more likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than White individuals (1·54 [1·10-2·16]; p=0·012), which became non-significant after adjusting for baseline disease severity and autoantibody status. The initiation of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs for patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis varies markedly by ethnicity and age in the universal health-care system of England and Wales. This study demonstrates the importance of providing tailored information and ensuring equitable access to high-quality care for underserved patient groups. The one-size-fits-all approach must be reconsidered if health disparities are to be mitigated effectively. Sandoz UK.

Tofacitinib for child-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can cause diverse clinical manifestations in multiple organ systems. Child-onset SLE (cSLE) is associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality than adult-onset SLE. The traditional treatments for SLE (glucocorticoids, antimalarials, conventional and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) often have significant adverse effects and may not fully control disease activity. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor that inhibits the JAK-STAT pathway and has the potential to reduce SLE severity. cSLE patients who received tofacitinib and had at least one follow-up visit were retrospectively examined. Case histories, laboratory test results, and treatment regimens were analyzed at disease onset, initiation of tofacitinib treatment, and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after starting tofacitinib. We examined 9 patients with refractory cSLE. All patients were female and the average age at diagnosis was 10.67 years. At initiation of tofacitinib, the average age was 13.28 years and the average disease duration was 2.62 years. Four patients experienced alleviation of symptoms and reduced their daily prednisone dosages; one of them also discontinued cyclosporine A and two of them also discontinued belimumab. The other 5 patients experienced no apparent benefit. Tofacitinib may provide clinical benefits for some patients with refractory cSLE, and can also allow reduction in the glucocorticoid dosage. Tofacitinib has the potential as an adjunctive treatment for some patients with cSLE.

Efficacy of formic acid in combination with cDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis.

The immune system of the body mistakenly targets its own joints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune disease that causes pain, inflammation, and damage. The complexity of RA often requires the simultaneous use of several different management strategies. This study examines the potential enhancement of conventional RA treatments, specifically conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs), by the addition of formic acid, a naturally occurring substance that may possess anti-inflammatory properties. A total of 90 children diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were examined at our hospital from 2020 to 2022. We segregated them into two cohorts, each consisting of 45 children. One cohort was administered conventional rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments, referred to as cDMARDs, which specifically included methotrexate and leflunomide. The other group was administered the standard treatments in addition to a low dosage of a specialized medication known as all-trans retinoic acid. We conducted follow-up assessments on the children at 6 months and 1-year post-treatment. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments by assessing the subjective reports of the children and their physicians, analyzing the outcomes of medical examinations, and examining diagnostic images, such as X-rays. Furthermore, we took measures to ensure the safety of the treatments. Among the cohort exclusively administered cDMARDs, approximately 26.7% exhibited significant improvement, 24.4% demonstrated moderate improvement, and 6.7% displayed minor improvement after a duration of 6 months. Approximately 57.8% of the children in this group experienced positive outcomes as a result of the treatment. The group that received retinoic acid also demonstrated superior outcomes. Approximately one-third (33.3%) of the participants demonstrated significant improvement, while another one-third showed moderate improvement. Additionally, 11.1% of the participants displayed minor improvement after a period of six months. Upon comparing the two groups, it was observed that the group receiving retinoic acid demonstrated a significantly superior outcome (p<0.05). Overall, the incorporation of all-trans retinoic acid alongside conventional treatments for children with RA appears to enhance their efficacy.

Exploring the effect on primary endpoints in trials testing targeted therapy interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-epidemiological study on the appropriate use of a core outcome set

ObjectivesTo explore which core domain is best associated with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response in trials assessing the effect of targeted interventions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsA meta-epidemiological...

Tocilizumab for cystoid macular edema secondary to retinitis pigmentosa

PurposeTo describe the effect of tocilizumab (TCZ) on cystoid macular edema (CME) and retinal vascular leakage (RVL) in retinitis pigmentosa (RP).MethodsRetrospective case series.ResultsWe present 2 cases of RP with marked inflammatory features in the form of CME and RVL. There was initial diagnostic uncertainty with posterior uveitis. Both patients were treated with corticosteroids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs), and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) for the inflammatory features with partial and inconsistent treatment response. When treatment was switched to intravenous (IV) TCZ, dramatic reduction in CME and RVL were observed in both patients. Diagnosis of RP was eventually made based on findings of ancillary tests (macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, visual fields, full-field electroretinogram). Genetic testing led to a molecular diagnosis of EYS-related autosomal recessive RP in patient 1, while patient 2 had negative gene panel results.ConclusionsIV TCZ can be an effective treatment option in RP-related CME and RVL. Whether this treatment strategy has an effect on prognosis remains to be established, but it is possible considering chronic CME-related retinal damage is a major driver of central vision loss in RP.

Review of Janus Kinase Inhibitors as Therapies for Noninfectious Uveitis.

Uveitis remains one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, with different etiologies requiring separate approaches to treatment. For over a decade, oral, topical, and local injection of corticosteroids as well as systemic conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have remained the most effective treatment for noninfectious uveitis (NIU). Systemic administration of antitumor necrosis factor-α and other biological DMARDs have been used for treating cases that responded inadequately to conventional treatments. Unfortunately, some refractory patients still suffer from frequent attacks despite the combination of multiple treatments. Recently, there has been promising evidence for Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors as the next-generation therapy for NIU. The JAK/signal transducers and activators of the transcription (STAT) signaling pathway mediate the downstream events involved in immune fitness, tissue repair, inflammation, apoptosis, and adipogenesis by binding various ligands, such as cytokines, growth hormones, and growth factors. The mutation or loss of JAK/STAT components is implicated in autoimmune diseases, thus inhibition of such pathways has been an important area of research in therapeutic development.1 In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors for the management of NIU, with evidence from current trials and case reports.

Drug-induced lung disease: a narrative review.

Drug-induced lung disease (DILD) encompasses a broad, highly heterogeneous group of conditions that may occur as a result of exposure to numerous agents, such as antineoplastic drugs, conventional or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, antiarrhythmics, and antibiotics. Between 3% and 5% of prevalent cases of interstitial lung diseases are reported as DILDs. The pathogenesis of lung injury in DILD is variable, multifactorial, and often unknown. Acute presentation is the most common, can occur from days to months after the start of treatment, and ranges from asymptomatic to acute respiratory failure. The CT patterns are varied and include ground-glass opacities, organizing pneumonia, and diffuse alveolar damage. Notably, there are no clinical manifestations or CT patterns specific to DILD, which makes the diagnosis quite challenging and necessitates a high index of suspicion, as well as the exclusion of alternative causes such as infection, cardiac-related pulmonary edema, exacerbation of a preexisting ILD, and neoplastic lung involvement. Discontinuation of the offending medication constitutes the cornerstone of treatment, and corticosteroid treatment is usually necessary after the onset of clinical manifestations. The prognosis varies widely, with high mortality rates in severe cases. A history of medications related to pulmonary toxicity in patients with new-onset respiratory symptoms should prompt consideration of DILD as a potential underlying cause.

Erosion regression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after upadacitinib-a pilot study using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

To evaluate whether inhibition of Janus kinases (JAK) 1 could lead to erosion repair on high-resolution peripheral quantitative computer tomography (HR-pQCT) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This was a prospective, non-randomized pilot study. We enrolled 20 adult patients with active RA with ≥1 bone erosion on HR-pQCT. They were given upadacitinib 15 mg once daily for 24 weeks. HR-pQCT of the metacarpophalangeal joint was performed at baseline and 24-week. The serum bone biomarkers level was evaluated before and after treatment. Twenty age-and-sex matched RA patients from another study treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were included as active controls. Nineteen patients in the upadacitinib group completed the study procedures. After 24 weeks, despite similar improvement in disease activity, a reversed trend in the mean erosion volume change on HR-pQCT was observed comparing the upadacitinib and active control group (upadacitinib group: -0.23 ± 3.26mm3 vs control group: 1.32 ± 6.05mm3, p= 0.131). A greater proportion of erosions in the upadacitinib group demonstrated regression (27% vs 12%, p= 0.085). Using general estimating equation (GEE), the use of upadacitinib was significantly associated with erosion regression (OR: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.00-13.00, p= 0.049) after adjusting for the difference in disease duration. The serum levels of bone resorption markers reduced after upadacitinib treatment. No new safety signal was noted. Despite a similar improvement in RA disease activity after upadacitinib compared with csDMARDs, a differential regression of erosion on HR-pQCT was observed in patients received upadacitinib. The potential role of JAK1 inhibition in erosion repair should be investigated.

Effect of abatacept versus conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

To compare the effects of abatacept and conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the progression and development of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). This multi-center retrospective study included RA patients receiving abatacept or csDMARDs who underwent at least two pulmonary function tests and/or chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We compared the following outcomes between the groups: progression of RA-ILD, development of new ILD in RA patients without ILD at baseline, 28-joint Disease Activity Score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), and safety. Longitudinal changes were compared between the groups by using a generalized estimating equation. The study included 123 patients who were treated with abatacept (n = 59) or csDMARDs (n = 64). Nineteen (32.2%) and 38 (59.4%) patients treated with abatacept and csDMARDs, respectively, presented with RA-ILD at baseline. Newly developed ILD occurred in one patient receiving triple csDMARDs for 32 months. Among patients with RA-ILD at baseline, ILD progressed in 21.1% of cases treated with abatacept and 34.2% of cases treated with csDMARDs during a median 21-month follow-up. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were comparable between the two groups. However, the abatacept group showed a more significant decrease in DAS28-ESR and glucocorticoid doses than csDMARDs group during the follow-up. The safety of both regimens was comparable. Abatacept and csDMARDs showed comparable effects on the development and stabilization of RA-ILD. Nevertheless, compared to csDMARDs, abatacept demonstrated a significant improvement in disease activity and led to reduced glucocorticoid use.

Budget impact of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in Argentina.

To analyze the budget impact of upadacitinib (UPA) 15 mg + methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with an inadequate response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARD-IR) from the perspective of social security and the private health sector in Argentina. A budget impact analysis model was developed for a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 adults with health insurance coverage who were diagnosed with RA over a 5-year time horizon. The model parameters were obtained through literature review and validated by local experts. The costs are expressed in 2024 US dollars (USD). The introduction of UPA 15 mg + MTX for the treatment of moderate-to-severe RA and cDMARD-IR resulted in minimal increase, with a five-year total cumulative incremental cost of USD 1,855 for social security and USD 1,812 for the private health sector, representing 2% of the total budget. The acquisition cost of UPA was the most influential variable in the sensitivity analysis. The introduction of UPA 15 mg + MTX for the treatment of moderate-to-severe RA and cDMARD-IR can provide an effective treatment option with a minimal increase in costs for the healthcare system in Argentina, which is especially important in developing countries where health system budgets are more limited. Providing evidence-based estimates is a valuable tool for informing healthcare policies and can help policymakers make informed decisions about the allocation of healthcare resources to improve patient outcomes while also managing costs.

Hepatitis B reactivation in PsA patients: an SLR and meta-analysis for IL-17, IL-23 and JAK inhibitors.

Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) constitutes a side effect of the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Even though HBVr risk of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents has long been established, the risk of targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs and anti-interleukin (anti-IL) agents remains largely unknown. We conducted a SLR (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE) and metanalysis to examine the HBVr risk for the following: anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and JAK-inhibitors in patients with chronic HBV infection (HBsAg presence or detectable HBV-DNA) and in patients with prior HBV infection (HBcAb-positive and HBsAg-negative). Meta-analysis was performed using both the fixed and random effects method and was conducted using the R computing language. Overall, our study revealed a low HBVr risk of < 6% in all agents; the risk was significantly higher for people having chronic compared with those with resolved HBV (14,4% vs 5.1%, respectively p< 0.01). There was no difference among different drugs in the HBVr rates [anti-IL-17: 4% (95% CI: 1-9%), anti-IL-12/IL-23: 2% (95% CI: 0-5%), JAK-inhibitors: 4% (95% CI: 1-8%), anti-IL23: 0%]. Of note, HBVr rate reached 28% in patients with chronic HBV who did not receive anti-viral treatment. For patients with resolved hepatitis the respective percentage was 4.7%. Overall, our meta-analysis shows that patients with chronic HBV receiving anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and JAK-inhibitors have significant risk for HBVr, especially if they are not under anti-viral treatment. In contrast, resolved HBV seems to offer minor risk for HBVr even without anti-viral treatment.

From Psoriasis to Psoriatic Arthritis: Decoding the Impact of Treatment Modalities on the Prevention of Psoriatic Arthritis.

Biologic therapies are licensed for both psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with some electronic medical record data suggest that IL (Interleukin)-23 blockers might be more protective in PsA prevention than TNF blockers; however, the findings have been inconsistent. Higher Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores have also been linked to an increased PsA risk. To clarify these unresolved issues we investigated biologic agents, methotrexate, phototherapy, and topical therapy for PsA prevention in patients with psoriasis. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 58,671 patients with psoriasis from the Israeli Meuhedet Health Services Organization database was evaluated for incident PsA. Patients were categorized on the basis of treatment: group1, topical therapy; group2, phototherapy; group3, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs; methotrexate); group4, biologic DMARDs which was also stratified according to biologic class. The PsA incidence rate was lower in the biologic agents' group versus the methotrexate group (HR 0.46 [95%CI 0.35-0.62]). The incidence rates per 100 person-years varied across biologic treatment groups, with the anti‑IL‑12/23 or anti‑IL‑23p19 group at 4.57, the anti-IL-17 group at 4.35, and the TNF inhibitor group at 2.55. No differences were found between various biological agents in terms of preventing PsA. The phototherapy group exhibited a higher PsA development rate than the topical therapy group (HR 1.85 [95%CI 1.65-2.07]). Biological agents are more effective than methotrexate in reducing incident PsA in patients with psoriasis. This lower rate of PsA on topical therapy compared to phototherapy supports the importance of psoriasis severity as a risk factor.

Sacroiliitis in familial Mediterranean fever: A rare joint involvement of the disease.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a monogenic autoinflammatory disease characterised by recurrent episodes of fever and polyserositis. Sacroiliac joint involvement is rare in FMF patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographic, clinical, laboratory and imaging findings of patients with FMF who developed sacroiliitis. The files of paediatric patients aged 0-18 years who were followed up with a diagnosis of FMF were retrospectively reviewed. FMF patients with evidence of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. Among 1062 FMF patients, 22 (12 males; median age 8.5) (2.1%) of them were found to have sacroiliitis. FMF was diagnosed before sacroiliitis in nine (40.9%) patients and after in 13 (59.1%) patients. The most common symptom in patients with sacroiliitis was low back pain (n = 21, 95.5%). In MEFV gene analysis, M694V was found in 16 (72.7%) patients and was the most common mutation. MRI showed evidence of sacroiliitis in all patients. All patients were using colchicine. Patients with FMF-associated sacroiliitis, remission was achieved with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 12 (54.5%), conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in six (27.3%) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in four (31.8%). Four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis when colchicine incompatible and four (31.8%) patients experienced sacroiliitis while using biologic agents for colchicine-resistant FMF. FMF-associated sacroiliitis should be considered especially in patients with M694V mutation if they have symptoms such as low back pain. Colchicine-resistant FMF patients should be evaluated for sacroiliitis symptoms at each visit.

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to biological treatments: results through 5 years from the SELECT-BEYOND study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over 5 years among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a long-term extension (LTE) of the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial.MethodsPatients refractory to...

Impact of conventional and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on arterial lesions in Takayasu arteritis.

The definition of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) remission and disease activity is still unclear. Vascular imaging is an essential tool for following-up patients. Herein, we aimed to compare the evolution of vascular lesions (ie vessel wall thickening and stenosis) under conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) relatively to biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) in TAK patients followed with the same CT angiography modalities. We compared 75 lines of therapy in TAK patients who received cDMARDs (n = 40 lines) and bDMARDs (n = 35 lines) using CT angiography. We established 1-3 main target vessels with vessel wall thickening and/or stenosis. Every targeted vessel had its thickness and its lumen diameter measured at the initiation of immunosuppressive treatment and at 12 months. We observed an overall reduction of arterial wall thickness in 73% of cases and 31% had >25% of wall thickness relative decrease. Using a linear mixed effects model, first line immunosuppressive therapy (p= 0.012) and bDMARDs relatively to cDMARDs (p= 0.026) were independently associated with vessel wall thickness reduction in TAK. Thirty-eight percent of the stenotic vessels had a > 25% relative increase in lumen diameter under immunosuppressive therapy. The relative increase >25% in lumen diameter was noted in 56% vs 17% with bDMARDs compared with cDMARDs. Immunosuppressive treatments can reduce arterial wall thickness and widen lumen diameter in TAK. bDMARDs seems to be more effective than cDMARDs to improve arterial lesions in TAK.

Cost-Effectiveness of Biosimilars vs Leflunomide in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to methotrexate, a treatment sequence initiated with biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) provides better clinical efficacy compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs recommended by current treatment guidelines; but its cost-effectiveness evidence remains unclear. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the treatment sequence initiated with biosimilar DMARDs after failure with methotrexate vs leflunomide and inform formulary listing decisions. This economic evaluation's cost-effectiveness analysis was performed at a Hong Kong public institution using the Markov disease transition model to simulate the lifetime disease progression and cost for patients with RA, using monetary value in 2022. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the internal validity of the modeling conclusion. Participants included patients diagnosed with RA from 2000 to 2021 who were retrieved retrospectively from local electronic medical records to generate model input parameters. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2023 to March 2024. The model assesses 3 competing treatment sequences initiated with biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13), biosimilar adalimumab (ABP-501), and leflunomide; all used in combination with methotrexate. Lifetime health care cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of the simulated cohort. In total, 25 099 patients with RA were identified (mean [SD] age, 56 [17] years; 19 469 [72.7%] women). In the base-case analysis, the lifetime health care cost and QALYs for the treatment sequence initiated with leflunomide were US $154 632 and 14.82 QALYs, respectively; for biosimilar infliximab, they were US $152 326 and 15.35 QALYs, respectively; and for biosimilar adalimumab, they were US $145 419 and 15.55 QALYs, respectively. Both biosimilar sequences presented lower costs and greater QALYs than the leflunomide sequence. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (US$/QALY) comparing biosimilar infliximab sequence vs leflunomide sequence and biosimilar adalimumab sequence vs leflunomide sequence ranged from -15 797 to -8615 and -9088 to 10 238, respectively, all below the predefined willingness-to-pay threshold (US $48 555/QALY gain). In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of treatment sequence initiated with leflunomide, biosimilar infliximab, and biosmilar adalimumab being cost-effective out of 10 000 iterations was 0%, 9%, and 91%, respectively. In this economic evaluation study, the treatment sequences initiated with biosimilar DMARDs were cost-effective compared with the treatment sequence initiated with leflunomide in managing patients with RA who experienced failure with the initial methotrexate treatment. These results suggest the need to update clinical treatment guidelines for initiating biosimilars immediately after the failure of methotrexate for patients with RA.

Silymarin Supplementation in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Outcomes of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Background and Objectives: Coadministration of natural products to enhance the potency of conventional antirheumatic treatment is of high interest. This study aimed to assess the impact of administration of silymarin (a nutritional supplement) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis under treatment with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Materials and Methods: One-hundred and twenty-two patients diagnosed with active rheumatoid arthritis and treated with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were randomly assigned to either control or intervention groups; the latter was supplemented with silymarin (300 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Indicators of disease activity, inflammatory markers, disease activity and disability indices, European League Against Rheumatism responses, fatigue, depression, and anxiety scores were determined at baseline and week 8. Results: Silymarin supplementation significantly reduced the number of tender and swollen joints, duration of morning stiffness, severity of pain, disease activity and disability indices, European League Against Rheumatism responses, levels of fatigue, depression, and anxiety. According to our results, silymarin substantially improved patients' general condition. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence for the benefits of silymarin supplementation to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

CO20 Treatment Regimens and Persistence in Colombian Patients Diagnosed With Rheumatologic Diseases After Failure of Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

CO20 Treatment Regimens and Persistence in Colombian Patients Diagnosed With Rheumatologic Diseases After Failure of Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs