Conventional Catheter-directed Thrombolysis Research Articles

Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) poses a significant risk to patient health, with treatment options varying in efficacy and safety. Ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USCDT) has emerged as a potential alternative to conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for patients with intermediate to high-risk APE. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of USCDT versus conventional CDT in patients with intermediate to high-risk APE. This observational retrospective study was conducted at the Armed Forces Hospital, Al-Hada, Taif, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), on 135 patients diagnosed with APE and treated with either USCDT or CDT (58 underwent CDT, while 77 underwent USCDT). The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the right ventricle to the left ventricle (RV/LV) diameter ratio.Secondary outcomes included changes in pulmonary artery systolic pressure and the Miller angiographic obstruction index score. Safety outcomes focused on major bleeding events. Both USCDT and CDT significantly reduced RV/LV diameter ratio (from 1.35 ± 0.14 to 1.05 ± 0.17, P < 0.001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) (from 55 ± 7 mmHg to 38 ± 7 mmHg, P < 0.001) at 48- and 12-hours post-procedure, respectively, with no significant differences between treatments. However, USCDT was associated with a significantly lower rate of major bleeding events compared to CDT (0% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.008). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that USCDT was associated with a 71.9% risk reduction of bleeding (OR = 0.281, 95% CI = 0.126 - 0.627, P = 0.002). USCDT is a safe and effective alternative to CDT for the treatment of intermediate to high-risk APE, as it significantly reduces the risk of major bleeding.

Comparison of Balloon-Occluded Thrombolysis with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Patients of Budd-Chiari Syndrome with Occluded Direct Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

Objectives Direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS) stent placement is an effective treatment for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS); however, thrombotic occlusion of DIPS stent remains a cause of concern. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel technique of balloon-occluded-thrombolysis (BOT) for occluded DIPS stent, and compare it with the conventional catheter-directed-thrombolysis (CDT). Methods In this retrospective study, the hospital database was searched for BCS patients who underwent DIPS revision for thrombotic stent occlusion between January 2015 and February 2021. Patients were divided into CDT group and BOT group. The groups were compared for technical success, total dose of thrombolytic agent administered, duration of hospital stay, and primary assisted stent patency rates at 1- and 6-month follow-up. Results CDT was performed in 12 patients, whereas 21 patients underwent BOT. Complete recanalization was achieved in 66.7% (8 of 12) patients of CDT group as compared to 81% (17 of 21) patients of BOT group (nonsignificant difference, p = 0.420). BOT group had a short hospital stay (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 3.5 ± 1.0 days) and required less dose of thrombolytic agent ([2.2 ± 0.4]x10 5 IU versus [8.3 ± 2.9]x10 5 IU of urokinase) as compared to the CDT group and both differences were statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Further, 6-month patency rate was higher in BOT group as compared to CDT group ( p = 0.024). Conclusion The novel BOT technique of DIPS revision allows longer contact time of thrombolytic agent with the thrombi within the occluded stent. This helps in achieving fast recanalization of thrombosed DIPS stent with a significantly less dose of thrombolytic agent required, thus reducing the risk of systemic complications associated with thrombolytic administration.

Retracted: Solitaire™ Stent Thrombectomy System in the Treatment of Acute Lower-Limb Ischemia: Comparisons in Safety and Effectiveness with Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Therapy.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/6997221.].

Central Venous Catheter as a Novel Approach to Postoperative Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

ABSTRACT Background and aims Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) along with postoperative thrombolysis (POT) has been the standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT). However, commonly used catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) approaches for POT carry certain disadvantages, including the need for a sheath, inferior comfortability, and catheter-related complications. Therefore, we propose a new simplified method of POT using a central venous catheter (CVC). Methods The retrospective study analyzed patients with IFDVT who underwent POT using CVC from January 2020 to August 2021. The treatment modalities included filter placement, thrombus removal, iliac vein obstruction release, postoperative CVC thrombolysis, filter retrieval, and adequate full course anticoagulation. Results A total of 39 patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent PMT surgery with a procedure success rate of 100%. In the post-PMT CVC thrombolysis, the puncture sites were located in the below-knee vein, including 58.97% in the peroneal vein. The mean duration of CVC-directed thrombolysis was 3.69 ± 1.08 days, and the total urokinase dose was 2.27 ± 0.71 MIU. A total of 37 patients (94.87%) had successful thrombolysis with a length of hospital stay of 5.82 ± 2.21 days. During CVC-directed thrombolysis, only four minor bleeding complications occurred, two of which were indwelling catheter-related. During the 12-month follow-up period, the patency rate and post-thrombotic syndrome incidences were 97.44% and 2.56%, respectively. Conclusion Thrombolysis through a CVC is a feasible, safe, and effective POT method, and could be an alternative to the conventional CDT approach for patients with IFDVT.

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis vs Anticoagulation in Patients With Acute Intermediate-High–risk Pulmonary Embolism

The optimal treatment of intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains unknown. To assess the effect of conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (cCDT) plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation monotherapy in improving echocardiographic measures of right ventricle (RV) to left ventricle (LV) ratio in acute intermediate-high-risk PE. The Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis vs Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Intermediate-High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism (CANARY) trial was an open-label, randomized clinical trial of patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, conducted in 2 large cardiovascular centers in Tehran, Iran, between December 22, 2018, through February 2, 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to cCDT (alteplase, 0.5 mg/catheter/h for 24 hours) plus heparin vs anticoagulation monotherapy. The proportion of patients with a 3-month echocardiographic RV/LV ratio greater than 0.9, assessed by a core laboratory, was the primary outcome. The proportion of patients with an RV/LV ratio greater than 0.9 at 72 hours after randomization and the 3-month all-cause mortality were among secondary outcomes. Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5) was the main safety outcome. A clinical events committee, masked to the treatment assignment, adjudicated clinical outcomes. The study was prematurely stopped due to the COVID-19 pandemic after recruiting 94 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [2.5] years; 27 women [29%]), of whom 85 patients completed the 3-month echocardiographic follow-up. Overall, 2 of 46 patients (4.3%) in the cCDT group and 5 of 39 patients (12.8%) in the anticoagulation monotherapy group met the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06-1.69; P = .24). The median (IQR) 3-month RV/LV ratio was significantly lower with cCDT (0.7 [0.6-0.7]) than with anticoagulation (0.8 [0.7-0.9); P = .01). An RV/LV ratio greater than 0.9 at 72 hours after randomization was observed in fewer patients treated with cCDT (13 of 48 [27.0%]) than anticoagulation (24 of 46 [52.1%]; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.80; P = .01). Fewer patients assigned to cCDT experienced a 3-month composite of death or RV/LV greater than 0.9 (2 of 48 [4.3%] vs 8 of 46 [17.3%]; OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-1.03; P = .048). One case of nonfatal major gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in the cCDT group. This prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial of patients with intermediate-high-risk PE was hypothesis-generating for improvement in some efficacy outcomes and acceptable rate of major bleeding for cCDT compared with anticoagulation monotherapy and provided support for a definitive clinical outcomes trial. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05172115.

Solitaire™ Stent Thrombectomy System in the Treatment of Acute Lower-Limb Ischemia: Comparisons in Safety and Effectiveness with Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Therapy.

Objective The study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Solitaire™ AB Stent System (ev3 Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) for the treatment of acute lower extremity ischemia (ALLI) compared with conventional catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with ALLI treated in the Department of Interventional Radiology at the First Hospital of Nanjing from January 2017 to April 2020 divided into a conventional (CDT) group (n = 106) and a percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) group (n = 55) according to the procedure. PMT was performed using the Solitaire™ AB stent system. The combined clinical outcomes of mortality, major amputation, recurrent ischemia, and major morbidity were compared between the two groups. Results Of the 161 patients, 128 (79.5%) did not have a composite clinical outcome after 12 months of follow-up, namely, 78 CDT patients and 50 PMT patients, with significant differences in composite clinical outcome (26.4% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.010) and mortality (19.8% vs. 7.3%, P = 0.037) between them. Thrombolytic drug dose (19.34 ± 5.93 vs. 13.55 ± 6.54 mg, P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (8.29 ± 3.91 vs. 5.49 ± 1.18 days, P = 0.003) were significantly lower in the PMT group. Conclusion PMT with the Solitaire™ AB Stent System is safer and more effective in treating patients with Rutherford stage I-IIB ALLI, with the advantage of rapid opening of obstructed vessels, shorter thrombolysis time, reduced thrombolytic dose, and improved blood flow to the infrapopliteal vessels.

Comparison of outcomes and complications in conventional versus ultrasound-accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis for treatment of pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acute submassive a massive pulmonary embolism are known as leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in emergency departments. Choosing the optimal type of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treatment of pulmonary embolism presents a quandary to the practitioners. To the best of our knowledge, there is no meta-analysis comparing superiority of conventional CDT and ultrasound-accelerated catheter directed thrombolysis (USACDT). Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare conventional CDT with USACDT regarding clinical outcomes and safety profile. A systematic literature search of previous published studies comparing conventional CDT with USACDT regarding clinical outcomes and safety profile was carried out in the electronic databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to December 2021. Data were analyzed by comprehensive meta-analysis software (CMA, version 3). The meta-analysis included nine studies with a total of 705 patients. Our meta-analysis showed that there is no significant difference between two groups with respect to pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (SMD: -0.084; 95% CI: -0.287 to 0.12; p: 0.41), RV/LV (SMD: -0.003; 95% CI: -0.277 to 0.270; p: 0.98), and Miller score (SMD: -0.345; 95% CI: -1.376 to 0.686; p: 0.51). Similarly, we found no statistically significant differences between two groups regarding major and minor bleeding (p > .05). Our meta-analysis showed that when compared with USACDT, conventional CDT provides similar clinical and hemodynamic outcomes or safety for treatment of pulmonary embolism without the need for very expensive technologies. However, randomized clinical trials are required to further investigate cost-effectiveness of USACDT in comparison with conventional CDT.

Endovascular revascularization strategies using catheter-based thrombectomy versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia

BackgroundAcute limb ischemia (ALI) is an important clinical event threatening both life and the affected limbs, but the optimal treatment for ALI remains undefined. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy approaches via either catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT).MethodsA total of 98 patients (mean age 69.7 years, 60 male) who underwent endovascular intervention for ALI from January 2015 to July 2019 were included. Of these, 57 were treated with primary CBT via a large-bore catheter, an AngioJet catheter or Rotarex catheter, and/or underwent low-dose CDT, and 41 were treated with primary CDT. The safety and effectiveness of CBT compared to conventional CDT and other various endovascular techniques were evaluated.ResultsMore Rutherford IIb patients were treated with primary CBT (68.4%) than CDT (26.8%; P < .001). Patients who underwent primary CDT achieved a higher technical success rate than those who underwent primary CBT in a shorter procedure time (P < .001), whereas 42.1% of patients who underwent CBT did not need adjunctive CDT. The duration and dosage of adjunctive CDT in the CBT group were significantly decreased compared with those in the primary CDT group (both P < .001), and the CBT group achieved a shorter in-hospital length of stay (P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated with AngioJet and Rotarex catheters achieved slightly lower dosages, shorter CDT durations and shorter in-hospital stay lengths than those treated with large-bore catheters (P > .05). Clinical success was estimated to be achieved in 98.2% of patients who underwent CBT, which is similar to the 97.6% estimated in those who underwent primary CDT (P = 1.000), and this finding was similar among the CBT subgroups. Patients who underwent CBT had a higher procedure-related distal embolization rate and economic cost than those who underwent primary CDT (P < .05), but it had slightly fewer complications than those who underwent primary CDT (P = .059), especially minor complications (P = .036). The freedom from amputation at 6 and 12 months for CBT and CDT was assessed (93.0% vs 90.2% respectively, P = .625; 89.5% vs 82.9%, respectively, P = .34,). Comparable limb salvage was found for different techniques of large bore catheters, AngioJet catheters and Rotarex catheters. The Kaplan-Meier table analysis also showed similar limb salvage rates between groups.ConclusionsEndovascular treatment of ALI with the use of catheter-based therapies is an effective modality that can reduce the requirement for thrombolysis, with expected reductions in hemorrhagic complications, but at the risk of remediable distal emboli and increased economic cost. It has a similar clinical outcome to conventional CDT alone. Different CBT techniques have comparable efficacy but different adverse event profiles.

Repeat angiography in patients undergoing conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for submassive pulmonary embolism: a large single-center experience

Purpose Few studies have examined conventional catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for the treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Moreover, angiographic resolution of thrombus burden following CDT has infrequently been characterized. This study describes a single-center experience treating submassive PE with CDT while utilizing repeat angiography to determine treatment efficacy. Methods A retrospective analysis of 140 consecutive patients who underwent CDT for submassive PE from December 2012 to June 2019 was performed. Angiographic resolution of thrombus burden after CDT was reported as high (>75%), moderate (51-75%), low (26-50%), or insignificant (≤25%). All angiograms were reviewed by two interventional radiologists. Secondary endpoints included reduction in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and clinical outcomes. Bleeding events were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse event criteria. Results CDT was performed in 140 patients with a mean rtPA dose of 25.3 mg and a mean treatment time of 26.0 hours. Angiographic resolution of thrombus burden was high in 70.0%, moderate in 19.3%, low in 5.7%, and insignificant in 3.6%; in 2 patients (1.4%) repeat angiography was not performed. Systolic PAP was reduced (47 vs. 35 mmHg, p Conclusion In patients with submassive PE undergoing CDT, angiographic resolution of thrombus burden is a safe and directly observable metric that can be used to determine procedural success. In this study, CDT with repeat angiography was associated with a 5.7% bleeding event rate and thirty-day mortality of 1.4%.

Comparison of ultrasound-accelerated versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Recent in vitro and clinical studies have shown that ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USACDT) can accelerate thrombolysis. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of USACDT with conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with deep vein thrombosis. A systematic search of the following electronic databases was performed from their dates of inception to 20 June 2020: MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. All randomized controlled trials that directly compared the complications and efficacy of USACDT and conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with deep vein thrombosis were identified. The statistical analysis was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software. Finally, 18 studies with a total of 597 participants were included in our meta-analysis according to the eligibility criteria. Pooled proportion of USACDT success in patients with deep vein thrombosis was 87.8% (18 studies; 95% CI: 83.1-91.3). Success rate was significantly higher in USACDT treatment than in conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment (seven studies; OR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.69-5.16; P < 0.01)). Although the mean infusion time was higher in catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment compared to USACDT treatment, this difference was not statistically significant (three studies; MD: -1.46; 95% CI: -3.25-0.32; P = 0.10). Moreover, pooled rate of complications was lower in USACDT than catheter-directed thrombolysis which was not statistically significant (seven studies; OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.13-1.76; P = 0.27). This meta-analysis revealed that USACDT significantly increased the success rate of thrombolysis compared to conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis. Furthermore, USACDT was associated with lower rate of complication and infusion time. Taken together, these findings confirm the superiority of this novel intervention over conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis in treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis.

Evaluation of Fibrinogen Levels during Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) on plasma fibrinogen levels (PFLs) in the setting of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and the relationship between PFL and hemorrhagic complications. Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of CDT procedures between 2009 and 2019 identified 147 CDT procedures for massive or submassive PE (55.8% males; age, 56.5 ± 14.8 years; 90.5% submassive). All patients received therapeutic anticoagulation during CDT with unfractionated heparin (UFH) (69.4%) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, 30.6%) infusion. CDT was performed with ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) catheters (n = 98), conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CCDT) catheters (n = 34), or a combination of both (n = 15). ResultsThere was a decrease (P = .007) of 15.1 ± 69.4 mg/dl from the initial PFL (376.1 ± 122.7 mg/dl) to the final PFL (361 ± 118.7 mg/dl), which was measured after a mean of 24.1 ± 11.7 hours with a mean tPA dose of 28.3 ± 14.2 mg. The fibrinogen nadir was 327.6 ± 107.1 mg/dl measured 13.4 ± 10.3 hours after initiation of thrombolysis. Of patients with hemorrhagic complications (n = 6), initial, final, and nadir PFL were not significantly lower (P = .053, P = .081, and P = .086, respectively) than the remainder of the cohort. No significant difference was noted in initial and final PFL between the LMWH and UFH groups (P = .2 and P = .1, respectively) or between the CCDT and USAT groups (P = .5 and P = .9, respectively). The UFH group had a lower nadir PFL than the LMWH group (P = .03). ConclusionsDespite a significant drop in PFL during CDT for acute PE, this was not associated with hemorrhagic complications. These findings were not affected by the choice of anticoagulant or catheter delivery system.

Aspiration Thrombectomy versus Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis as First-Line Treatment for Noniatrogenic Acute Lower Limb Ischemia

PurposeTo examine the efficacy, safety, and procedural costs of percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy (PAT) as a first-line treatment for noniatrogenic acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) compared with conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Materials and MethodsAll patients who underwent endovascular intervention for ALI from January 2015 to August 2017 were included. Fifteen patients were treated with the use of primary PAT and 27 patients were treated with the use of primary CDT. The primary end point was complete thrombus clearance with improvement in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score. Adjunctive treatment for thrombus removal was considered to indicate technical failure. Treatment of underlying chronic disease was not considered to indicate technical failure. Procedural costs for each patient were calculated by itemizing all disposable equipment, facility overheads, and staff costs. ResultsOf the 15 primary PAT patients, technical success was achieved in 8 (53%); the remaining 7 (47%) required adjunctive CDT. Of the 27 primary CDT patients, technical success was achieved in 25 (89%); the remaining 2 (11%) required adjunctive PAT. There were 4 complications in the primary PAT group: 2 were procedure related and of a minor grade. There were 8 complications in the primary CDT group: All were procedure-related, including 2 major groin/retroperitoneal hemorrhage and 1 death from intracranial hemorrhage. Limb salvage was attained in all patients. There were no significant differences in average procedural costs per patient between the 2 groups. ConclusionsFirst-line use of PAT for endovascular treatment of ALI can reduce the need for CDT, with no significant cost difference.

Early clinical outcomes of a novel rheolytic directional thrombectomy technique for patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with first-generation techniques is often incomplete and adjunctive conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is required in more than half of patients to achieve venous patency. From the prospective Bern Venous Stent Registry, we investigated rates of primary treatment success, primary patency, and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) from 40 consecutive patients (mean age 51 ± 19 years, 45 % women) with acute iliofemoral DVT, treated with a novel directional RT technology and stent placement. Overall, 24 patients were treated for native-vessel iliofemoral DVT (11 with single-session RT, 13 with bail-out RT after failed CDT) and 16 for iliofemoral stent thrombosis. Pulse-spray thrombolysis (r-tPA 10 mg) was performed in 29 (73 %) patients. The mean follow-up duration was 193 ± 132 days (minimum 90 days). Overall, primary treatment success of RT was 95 %; only two patients required adjunctive CDT to restore patency. In 24 patients with native-vessel DVT, six-month primary patency was 92 % (95 %CI 75-99 %), and 23 patients (96 %) were free from the PTS according to the Villalta score. In 16 patients with stent thrombosis, six-month primary patency was 63 % (95 %CI 35-85 %) and 50 % were free from PTS. Except for transient macroscopic haemoglobinuria in all patients, no other side effects were recorded. In patients with iliofemoral DVT of native or stented vessels, RT followed by stent placement appears to be effective and safe. The novel technique enables single-session DVT treatment in the majority of patients without the need for prolonged CDT.

Ultrasound‐assisted versus conventional catheter‐directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: 1‐year follow‐up data of a randomized‐controlled trial

Background In patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) aims to prevent the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). Adding intravascular high-frequency, low-power ultrasound energy to CDT does not seem to improve the immediate thrombolysis results but its impact on clinical outcomes at 12 months is not known. Patients/Methods In this randomized-controlled trial, 48 patients (mean age 50 ± 21 years; 52% women) with acute IFDVT were randomized to conventional CDT (n = 24) or ultrasound-assisted CDT (USAT; n = 24). In both groups, a fixed-dose thrombolysis regimen (20 mg r-tPA over 15 h) was used, followed by routine stenting of residual venous obstruction. At 12 months, PTS and venous disease severity (Villalta score and revised Venous Clinical Severity Score [rVCSS]), disease-specific quality of live (QOL; CIVIQ-20) and duplex-sonographic outcomes were assessed. Results Among the 45 surviving patients, 40 (89%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 76-96%) patients were free from PTS (defined as Villalta score < 5 points; 83%, 95% CI 61-95% in the USAT and 96%, 95% CI 77-100% in the CDT group), with a similar mean total Villalta score of 2.3 ± 2.9 vs. 1.7 ± 1.6, and a mean total rVCSS of 3.0 ± 3.5 vs. 2.7 ± 2.9 in the USAT and the CDT groups, respectively. Both groups had good disease-specific QOL with a CIVIQ-20 score of 29.4 ± 11.8 vs. 26.1 ± 7.8, respectively. Primary (100% vs. 92%) and secondary (100% vs. 96%) iliofemoral patency rates and presence of femoro-popliteal venous reflux (39% vs. 33%) were similar in both groups. Conclusion The addition of intravascular ultrasound energy to conventional CDT for the treatment of acute IFDVT did not have any impact on relevant clinical or duplex sonographic outcomes, which were favorable in both study groups. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier:NCT01482273.

Role of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in Management of Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis.

The treatment for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is challenging, as the use of anticoagulation alone can be insufficient for restoring venous patency and thus lead to prolongation of acute symptoms and an increased risk of chronic complications, including venous insufficiency and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). In these cases, earlier and more complete thrombus removal can ameliorate acute symptoms and reduce long-term sequelae. Endovascular therapies involving the use of pharmacologic, mechanical, and combined pharmacomechanical modalities have been developed to achieve these goals. The most frequently used of these techniques, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), involves the infusion of a thrombolytic agent through a multiple-side-hole catheter placed within the thrombosed vein to achieve high local doses and thereby break down the clot while minimizing systemic thrombolytic agent exposure. Randomized controlled trial results have indicated decreased PTS rates and improved venous patency rates in patients treated with CDT compared with these rates in patients treated with anticoagulation. The use of newer pharmacomechanical techniques, as compared with conventional CDT, reduces procedural times and thrombolytic agent doses and is the subject of ongoing investigations. Endovascular thrombus removal techniques offer a means to improve venous valvular function and decrease the risk of debilitating long-term complications such as PTS and are a promising option for treating patients with iliofemoral DVT. (©)RSNA, 2016.

EkoSonic Thrombolysis as a Therapeutic Adjunct in Venous Occlusive Disease.

The use of ultrasound waves in conjunction with local thrombolysis may accelerate clot resolution and serve as an important therapeutic adjunct in the treatment of venous occlusive disease. Our goal was to provide a larger sample population over a 5-year period to evaluate our experience with the EkoSonic endovascular system (EKOS, EKOS Corporation, Bothell, WA). We suspected that ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (UAT) using EKOS would provide excellent thrombolysis and midterm patency rates with minimal thrombolytic complications. A retrospective study was conducted to provide a case series with UAT using EKOS. Data were collected over a 5-year period. Primary end points included degree of thrombolysis. Secondarily, we analyzed thrombolytic usage, complication rates, and midterm patency, over a 1-year period. A total of 48 limbs were treated with UAT. Forty cases were diagnosed as acute, whereas the remaining 8 were chronic. Complete thrombolysis was successful in 38/48 (79%) of patients, and partial thrombolysis was accomplished in 10/48 (21%) of patients. Overall mean infusion time was 22.4 hours ±3.6. There were a total of three complications (6%), all of which were minor bleeding. One-year patency was shown to be 87% with no signs of valvular reflux. UAT using EKOS demonstrated effective rates of thrombolysis with very few complications. In addition, our 1-year patency rates were comparable to published data using conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis. UAT provides lytic therapy by utilizing the benefits of ultrasonic waves to help augment the fibrinolytic process. Our institution currently favors the use of EKOS as the treatment of choice in patients that are appropriate thrombolytic candidates.

Ultrasound-assisted versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

For patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, it remains unclear whether the addition of intravascular high-frequency, low-power ultrasound energy facilitates the resolution of thrombosis during catheter-directed thrombolysis. In a controlled clinical trial, 48 patients (mean age 50 ± 21 years, 52% women) with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis were randomized to receive ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (N = 24) or conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (N = 24). Thrombolysis regimen (20 mg r-tPA over 15 hours) was identical in all patients. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of thrombus load reduction from baseline to 15 hours according to the length-adjusted thrombus score, obtained from standardized venograms and evaluated by a core laboratory blinded to group assignment. The percentage of thrombus load reduction was 55% ± 27% in the ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis group and 54% ± 27% in the conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis group (P = 0.91). Adjunctive angioplasty and stenting was performed in 19 (80%) patients and in 20 (83%) patients, respectively (P > 0.99). Treatment-related complications occurred in 3 (12%) and 2 (8%) patients, respectively (P > 0.99). At 3-month follow-up, primary venous patency was 100% in the ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis group and 96% in the conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis group (P = 0.33), and there was no difference in the severity of the post-thrombotic syndrome (mean Villalta score: 3.0 ± 3.9 [range 0-15] versus 1.9 ± 1.9 [range 0-7]; P=0.21), respectively. In this randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treated with a fixed-dose catheter thrombolysis regimen, the addition of intravascular ultrasound did not facilitate thrombus resolution. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01482273.

Mechanical Thrombectomy with Trerotola Compared with Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is safe and effective in reducing thrombus burden. MT utilizing a percutaneous thrombectomy device confers a great advantage because it may reduce both the dose of the thrombolytic agent and the overall procedure time compared with a conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). We examined the results of MT using the Trerotola device and evaluated factors affecting patient outcome. This retrospective study was performed using data from a database of patients who had undergone treatment for an acute iliofemoral DVT from January 2005 to December 2011, at 2 institutions. The patients' clinical characteristics and procedures were compared, and the outcomes of treatment with the Trerotola in the MT group were compared with those obtained with CDT. There were a total of 98 DVTs (left 76; right 22) in 90 patients (34 men); 53 DVTs were treated with MT and 45 with CDT. There were no statistical differences in the clinical characteristics among the MT with CDT, MT only and CDT group. Inferior vena cava filters were placed in 93 DVTs (95%), and iliac vein stenting was used in 64 (65%). Symptom improvement was seen in 78% (18 limbs) of the MT group, 80% (24 limbs) of the MT with CDT group, and 71% (32 limbs) of the CDT group (P = 0.498). The procedure time was shorter in the MT with CDT group (18.2 ± 8.2 hr) or in the MT only group (2.7 ± 2.0 hr) compared with the CDT group (29.3 ± 9.4 hr; P < 0.001). Urokinase dose was lower in MT only (0 million units) or in the MT with CDT group (5.13 ± 3.72 million units) than in the CDT group (7.51 ± 4.54 million units; P < 0.001). There was no difference in complications during the procedures or in primary patency rate during the follow-up period (mean 16.0 ± 19.1 months; range: 0-78 months). MT with the Trerotola device for acute iliofemoral DVT required shorter procedure times and lower urokinase doses than conventional CDT, while providing the same results.

Catheter-Based Reperfusion Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism

Case Presentation: A 76-year-old man with a history of hemicolectomy for colon cancer 10 days previously was admitted because of syncope and severe shortness of breath. On physical examination, the patient was hemodynamically unstable, with a systolic arterial pressure of 80 mm Hg, a heart rate of 124 beats per minute, and distended jugular veins. He was agitated and unable to speak full sentences. His respiratory rate was 28 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation was 80% on room air. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a filling defect of the left main pulmonary artery, complete occlusion of the left lower lobe pulmonary artery, nonobstructive filling defects of the right lower lobe pulmonary artery, and right ventricular enlargement (right-to-left ventricular dimension ratio of 1.4) (Figure 1). The hemodynamic situation remained unchanged after initiation of treatment with oxygen, intravenous unfractionated heparin, and normal saline. Figure 1. Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomogram from the first case. Left, Complete occlusion of the left lower lobe pulmonary artery (large arrow) and nonobstructive filling defect in the right lower lobe pulmonary artery (small arrow). Right, The subannular right-to-left ventricular dimension ratio was obtained from the reconstructed 4-chamber view.1 Right (47.3 mm) and left (33.9 mm) ventricular dimensions were measured perpendicular to the interventricular septum and 1 cm above the atrioventricular annulus plane. The right-to-left ventricular dimension ratio was calculated as 1.4. Case Presentation: A 55-year-old woman suddenly developed acute shortness of breath 3 weeks after resection of a meningioma. On physical examination, the patient appeared hemodynamically stable, with a systolic arterial pressure of 100 mm Hg, a heart rate of 96 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 18 breaths per minute, and an oxygen saturation of 89% while receiving 3 L of oxygen via face mask. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography confirmed subtotal filling defects in both main pulmonary …

Single-session endovascular treatment for symptomatic lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a feasibility study

The risk of complications and discomfort in patients who undergo prolonged infusion of a thrombolytic agent is significant when conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis is used to treat lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). To evaluate the feasibility and safety of single-session endovascular treatment for symptomatic lower extremity DVT. Single-session endovascular treatment for lower extremity DVT was performed on 29 limbs in 26 patients diagnosed with acute DVT in our institution. Nine patients were male and 17 female, with a mean age of 64 years (range 28-82 years). At 5-10 min after the locoregional injection of the thrombolytic agent (urokinase) via a 5-Fr catheter to soften the thrombus, aspiration thrombectomy was performed with a large-bore sheath. In patients with an underlying anatomical stenosis or obstruction, combined angioplasty with or without stent placement was performed immediately after the complete removal of the thrombus. We then evaluated the technical and clinical outcomes of the procedure, along with any complications or recurrences of DVT. Technical success was achieved in 24 procedures (82.8%) of single-session endovascular treatment for lower extremity DVT, and clinical success was achieved in 22 (75.9%) of these single-session procedures. Additional catheter-directed thrombolysis procedures were performed on five limbs after repeated aspiration thrombectomies failed to completely remove thrombi in those limbs. Stenotic or occlusive lesions were revealed in 24 limbs and percutaneous angioplasty procedures with or without stent placement were performed in these cases. No major complications resulted from the procedure. Single-session endovascular treatment is a feasible technique that provides acceptable technical and clinical success with excellent safety for treating symptomatic lower extremity DVT.