Conventional Arthroplasty Research Articles

Clinical Trends and Outcomes in Technology-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background/Objectives: In recent years, there has been a widespread focus on implementing technology in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to further improve precision and outcomes. This study aimed to identify recent trends in the utilization, clinical variables, and rate of adverse events for technology-assisted THA (TA-THA) and compare the outcomes to those of conventional THA. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database queried data on THA patients (CPT 27130) from 2015 to 2020. Technology assistance was identified with CPT 20985, 0054T, and 0055T. Matched cohorts were created to compare clinical comorbidities and adverse events. Results: This analysis included 219,216 conventional THAs and 2258 cases utilizing TA-THA. The number and percentage of surgeries utilizing technology, as well as the average operative time, consistently rose from 2015 to 2019, with all declining in 2020. Length of stay decreased yearly from 2015 to 2019, with an increase in 2020. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events by year. Matched cohort analysis demonstrated that TA-THA led to longer operative times (102.6 ± 35.6 vs. 91.6 ± 37.4 min, p < 0.001) and a shorter average length of stay (1.6 ± 1.4 vs. 2.0 ± 1.9 days, p < 0.001). Transfusion rates were higher in the TA-THA cohort (6.0% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.013). Conclusions: The usage of TA-THA increased from 2015 to 2019, with declines during 2020. TA-THA led to longer operative times, increased transfusion rates, and no difference in the incidence of adverse events compared to conventional arthroplasty. These findings demonstrate that TA-THA is growing in popularity without a significant improvement in short-term complication rates.

Revision total elbow arthroplasty: a primer for exam candidates

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has a relatively high revision rate compared to conventional joint arthroplasties (4–7% at 5 years). The cause for revision is most commonly implant loosening. A thorough work-up with history, examination, bloods, radiographs and joint tissue or fluid samples are all required to rule out peri-prosthetic infection. Patient factors and soft tissue management must be considered before revising a TEA to ensure the best outcome and longevity of the revised implant. Surgical strategies for TEA revision include single or two-stage revision, bearing exchange, bone windows and strut grafts.

Does robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restore native joint line more accurately than with conventional instruments?

The study's primary aim is the restoration of native joint line in patients having robotic-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty and conventional unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Literature in the past has demonstrated that reducing the joint line can result in greater failure rates. This is a prospective cohort investigation of patients who had medial UKA between March 2017 and March 2022.All patient's pre-operative and post-operative radiological joint line assessments were examined by two observers by Weber's methods. Robotic-assisted UKA performed with hand-held image-free robots was compared to conventional UKA groups. The distal position of the femoral component was higher in Group B utilizingconventional tools than in Group A employing robotic-assisted UKA. This positional difference was statistically significant. The mean difference among the pre-operative and post-operative joint lines in Group A was 1.6 ± 0.49 (range 0.8mm-2.4mm), while it was 2.47 ± 0.51 (range 1.6mm-3.9mm) (p 0.005) in Group B. In Group A, a greater percentage of the subjects (64%) attained a femoral component position within two millimetersfrom the joint line, whereas just 18% in Group B did. When compared with the conventional UKA technique, the meticulous attention to detail and planning forligament rebalancing when using the robotic-assisted UKA technique not solely enhancesurgical precision for implant placing but additionally provides excellent native joint line restoration and balancing. For validation of its longevity and survivability, the cohort must be tracked for a longer period of time.

A low-dose biplanar X-ray imager has RSA level precision in total knee arthroplasty.

The low radiation biplanar X-ray imager (EOS imaging, Paris, France) scans patients in a weight-bearing position, provides calibrated images, and limits radiation, an asset for serial radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies. RSA in vivo precision values have not been published for this type of imaging system, thus the goal of this study was to assess the precision of RSA in vivo utilizing a low radiation biplanar imager. At a mean of 5 years post-surgery (range 1.4-7.5 years), 15 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) participants (mean age 67 years at the time of imaging, 12 female, 3 male) with RSA markers implanted during index surgery were scanned twice at the same visit in the EOS imager. Precision of marker-based analysis was calculated by comparing the position of the implant relative to the underlying bone between the 2 examinations. The 95% limit of precision was 0.11, 0.04, and 0.15 mm along the x, y, and z axes, respectively and 0.15°, 0.20°, and 0.14° around the same axes. This precision study has shown an in vivo RSA precision of ≤ 0.15 mm and ≤ 0.20°, well within published uniplanar values for conventional arthroplasty RSA, with the added benefit of weight-bearing imaging, a lower radiation dose, and without the need for a reference object during the scan.

Comparison of conventional and robotic knee arthroplasty results: A retrospective observational study.

This study aimed to determine whether a standard anesthetic protocol consisting of combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in conjunction with controlled hypotensive anesthesia (CHA), which was used for conventional total knee arthroplasty (cTKA), could provide equally effective anesthetic conditions for robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Data were collected from the medical records of 113 patients (median age=67 years; age range=55-84) who underwent elective unilateral cTKA (n=52) or rTKA (n=61) without a tourniquet from 2021 to 2023. The primary outcome measure was the rate of patients whose anesthetic method did not provide adequate motor and sensory block during the surgery and had to be converted to general anesthesia. The secondary outcome measure was to compare perioperative variables, including pain scores, analgesic consumption, blood loss, transfusions, and complications. In 6 patients (11.5%) in group rTKA, it was required to convert CSEA to general anesthesia at 160-180 minutes due to the pain at the operative knee and/or to the movement of the operative leg during surgery compared to none / zero in group cTKA (P=.008). Motor and sensory blocks terminated earlier than the total surgery time in those patients. Mean total surgery time was significantly higher in group rTKA than in group cTKA (151.25 ± 24.51 (120-240) minutes vs. 116.72 ± 4.99 (105-125) minutes, P < .001). Total surgery times tended to decrease gradually in group rTKA after the 11th case, indicating a learning curve for surgical performance. Conversion to general anesthesia was required only in 1 patient after the 11th case compared to the previous 5 patients. Mean pain scores and rescue analgesic consumption were higher in group rTKA at postoperative 0 hour and between 0 and 4 hours (P < .05) but similar at the following time points (P > .05). Blood loss, transfusion, and complication rates were similar (P > .05). Hospital discharge times were higher in group rTKA (P < .05). Although our standard CSEA protocol failed due to the regression of motor and sensory block during surgery in 11.5% of patients in rTKA, the CSEA technique combined with controlled hypotensive anesthesia provided similar anesthetic conditions in the remaining patients in group rTKA as in group cTKA. The CSEA may be considered an effective and safe anesthetic method for rTKA if interventions are applied to extend the duration of the CSEA for this novel surgical technique. Level III, Therapeutic Study.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Conventional Versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

This study aims to compare the outcomes and advantages of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using conventional surgical techniques with those conducted using robotic-assisted methods in terms of operation time, Oxford knee score, range of motion, tourniquet time, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis index. We performed a literature search through five databases, namely, PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, from inception until July 3, 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohorts comparing conventional TKA with robotic-assisted TKA were included. The risk of bias of the included RCTs was determined using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the National Institutes of Health tool for cohort studies. We conducted a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.4. To analyze continuous data, we calculated the mean difference (MD) along with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). By synthesizing data from a comprehensive analysis, the study unveiled noteworthy distinctions between robotic-assisted arthroplasty and conventional arthroplasty across critical parameters. First, a substantial alteration in the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was observed, with the robotic-assisted approach demonstrating a significant difference (MD = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.25-1.43, p = 0.005). Second, in terms of operative time, a notable reduction in surgical duration was noted with conventional TKA (MD = 16.85, 95% CI = 8.08-25.63, p = 0.0002). The assessment of tourniquet time exhibited a significantly longer duration for robotic-assisted arthroplasty (MD = 35.70, 95% CI = 27.80-43.61, p < 0.001). Our findings indicate that conventional TKA outperforms robotic-assisted TKA, primarily due to its shorter operative and tourniquet times, along with a more favorable change in the HKA angle. However, it is worth noting that robotic-assisted TKA showed a slight advantage in pain outcomes, although this advantage was not statistically significant. To gain a more comprehensive understanding, we recommend conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial that directly compares both TKA methods. This trial should evaluate costs and long-term outcomes while ensuring consistent follow-up durations among studies. Such an approach would greatly assist orthopedic decision-making and contribute to improved TKA outcomes.

Robotic Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Robotic-assisted surgery is a computer-controlled technique that may improve the accuracy and outcomes of unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a partial knee replacement surgery. The purpose of a meta-analysis about robotic-assisted versus conventional surgery for unicompartmental TKA is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods based on the current evidence. Our meta-analysis can help inform clinical decisions and guidelines for surgeons and patients who are considering unicompartmental TKA as a treatment option. We searched four online databases for studies that compared the two methods until March 2023. We used RevMan software to combine the data from the studies. We calculated the mean difference (MD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome, which are statistical measures of the difference and the uncertainty between the two methods. We included 16 studies in our analysis. We found that robotic-assisted surgery had a better hip-knee-ankle angle, which is a measure of how well the knee is aligned, than conventional surgery (MD = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.16-1.56). We also found that robotic-assisted surgery had a better Oxford Knee score, which is a measure of how well the knee functions, than conventional surgery (MD = 3.03, 95% CI = 0.96-5.110). This study compared the results of conventional and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in 12 studies. We concluded that robotic-assisted surgery may have some benefits over conventional surgery in terms of alignment and function of the knee. However, we did not find any significant difference between the two methods in terms of other outcomes, such as pain, range of motion, health status, and joint awareness. Therefore, we suggest that more research is needed to confirm these results and evaluate the long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery.

Technological Innovations in Shoulder Replacement: Current Concepts and the Future of Robotics in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been rapidly evolving over the last several decades, with innovative technological strategies being investigated and developed in order to achieve optimal component precision, joint alignment and stability, preserve implant longevity, and improve patient outcomes. Future advancements such as robotic-assisted surgeries, augmented reality, artificial intelligence, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and other peri/preoperative planning tools will continue to revolutionize TSA. Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a novel and increasingly popular alternative to the conventional arthroplasty procedure in the hip and knee but has not yet been investigated in the shoulder. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review of the literature on the evolution and projected trends of technological advances and robotic assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. A narrative synthesis method was employed for this review, rather than a meta-analysis or systematic review of the literature. This decision was based on two primary factors: (1) the lack of eligible, peer-reviewed studies with high quality level of evidence available for review on robotic-assisted shoulder arthroplasty, and (2) a narrative review allows for a broader scope of content analysis, including a comprehensive review of all technological advances-including robotics-within the field of TSA. A general literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. These databases were queried by two independent reviewers from database inception through November 11, 2022, for all articles investigating the role of robotics and technology-assistance in total shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria included studies describing "shoulder arthroplasty" and "robotics". After exclusion criteria were applied, four studies on robotic-assisted TSA were described in the review. Given the novelty of this technology and limited data on robotics in TSA, these studies consisted of a literature review, non-validated experimental biomechanical studies in sawbones models, and preclinical proof-of-concept cadaveric studies using prototype robotic technology primarily in conjunction with patient specific instrumentation (PSI). The remaining studies described the technological advancements in TSA, including PSI, computer-assisted navigation (CAS), artificial intelligence, machine learning, and virtual/augmented/mixed reality. Although not yet commercially available, robotic-assisted TSA confers the theoretical advantages of precise humeral head cuts for restoration of proximal humerus anatomy (RPHA), more accurate glenoid preparation, and improved soft-tissue assessment in limited early studies. The evidence for the use of robotics in THA and TKA demonstrates improved component accuracy, more precise radiographic measurements, and improved early/mid-term patient-reported and functional outcomes. While no such data currently exists for shoulder arthroplasty given that the technology has not yet been commercialized, the lessons learned from robotic hip and knee surgery in conjunction with its rapid adoption suggests robotic-assisted TSA is on the horizon of innovation. By achieving a better understanding of the past, present and future innovations in TSA through this narrative review, orthopedic surgeons can be better prepared for future applications.

Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: historical perspectives and current innovations.

Robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) has emerged as a successful approach for optimizing implant positioning accuracy, minimizing soft tissue injury, and improving patient-reported outcomes. The application of RAUKA is expected to increase because of its advantages over conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. This review article provides an overview of RAUKA, encompassing the historical development of the procedure, the features of the robotic arm and navigation systems, and the characteristics of contemporary RAUKA. The article also includes a comparison between conventional unicompartmental arthroplasty and RAUKA, as well as a discussion of current challenges and future advancements in the field of RAUKA.

3D Planning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A New Approach to More Precise Surgery

Introduction: The objective of this work was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the results of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the management of coxarthrosis, the influence of certain factors on the results compared to conventional arthroplasty, its limits and its complications. Methods: We conducted a review of the literature concerning the interest of 3D planning in total hip prosthesis. Results: In terms of functional results, a clear clinical improvement was noted, in particular thanks to the relatively short duration of the operation and especially thanks to the hospitalization time of an average of 5 days. The survival rate of the prostheses was 100%. The radiographic results were also satisfactory with a markedly improved Harris functional score, a very close leg length with an overall inclination angle of 38 compared to 45 for the conventional prosthesis. Conclusion: Our study confirmed the data in the literature concerning the results of computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty, and supported the advantages and disadvantages of this technique.

FOCAL RESURFACING OF THE KNEE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

AbstractIntroductionActive, middle-aged patients with symptomatic cartilage or osteochondral defects can find themselves in a treatment gap when they have failed conservative measures but are not yet eligible for conventional arthroplasty. Data from various cohort studies suggests that focal knee resurfacing implants such as HemiCAP, UniCAP, Episealer or BioBoly are cost-effective solutions to alleviate pain, improve function and delay or eliminate the need for conventional replacement. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in order to(i) evaluate revision rates and implant survival of focal resurfacing; (ii) explore surgical complications; and (iii) evaluate various patient reported clinical outcome measures.MethodologyPubMED, Cochrane Library and Medline databases were searched in February 2022 for prospective and retrospective cohort studies evaluating any of the available implant types. Data on incidence of revision, complications and various patient reported outcome measures was sourced.ResultsA total of 24 unique studies were identified with a total of 1465 enrolled patients. A revision rate of 12.97% over a 5.9 year weighted mean follow-up period was observed across all implant types. However, in one series a Kaplan-Meir survival as high as 92.6% at a 10-year follow-up period was noted. A statistically significant improvement was documented across multiple subjective clinical outcomes scores. There was a low reported incidence of post-operative complications such as aseptic loosening or deep wound infection.ConclusionsFocal femoral resurfacing appears to be a viable treatment option for focal symptomatic chondral lesions in patients beyond biological reconstruction, with low revision rates and high patient satisfaction.

Short-term outcomes following 159 stemmed pyrolytic carbon shoulder hemiarthroplasties and how they compare with conventional hemiarthroplasties and total shoulder arthroplasties in patients younger than 60 years with osteoarthritis: results from the New Zealand National Joint Registry.

Despite the increasing use of pyrolytic carbon (pyrocarbon) hemiarthroplasty (PyCHA), clinical data reporting on its outcomes remain scarce. To date, no studies have compared the outcomes of stemmed PyCHA vs. conventional hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in young patients. The primary aim of this study was to report on the outcomes of the first 159 stemmed PyCHAs performed in New Zealand. The secondary aim was to compare the outcomes of stemmed PyCHA vs. HA and aTSA in patients aged <60 years with osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that stemmed PyCHA would be associated with a low revision rate. We further hypothesized that in young patients, PyCHA would be associated with a lower revision rate and superior functional outcomes compared with HA and aTSA. Data from the New Zealand National Joint Registry were used to identify patients who underwent PyCHA, HA, and aTSA between January 2000 and July 2022. The total number of revisions in the PyCHA group was determined, and the indications for surgery, reasons for revision, and types of revision were recorded. In patients aged <60 years, a matched-cohort analysis was performed comparing functional outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). The revision rate of PyCHA was compared with that of HA and aTSA, calculated as revisions per 100 component-years. In total, 159 cases of stemmed PyCHA were performed and 5 cases underwent revision, resulting in an implant retention rate of 97%. Among patients aged <60 years with shoulder osteoarthritis, 48 underwent PyCHA compared with 150 who underwent HA and 550 who underwent aTSA. Patients treated with aTSA had a superior OSS compared with PyCHA and HA patients. The difference in the OSS between the aTSA and PyCHA groups exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 4.3. There was no difference in revision rates between the groups. This study represents the largest cohort of patients treated with PyCHA and is the first to compare stemmed PyCHA with HA and aTSA in young patients. In the short term, PyCHA appear to be a promising implant with an excellent implant retention rate. In patients aged <60 years, the revision rate is comparable between PyCHA and aTSA. However, aTSA remains the implant of choice to optimize early postoperative function. Further studies are required to elucidate the long-term outcomes of PyCHA, particularly how they compare with those of HA and aTSA in young patients.

Hip joint function and reconstruction of the anterior femoral offset in patients with short stem vs. conventional THA

In cases where mobility and joint function are impaired after implantation of a THA, weakening of hip movement in both extension/flexion and adduction/abduction may play a role due to shortening of the physiological lever arm of the hip muscles. Mechanical factors of influence include the lateral femoral offset, which affects the lever arm, and the antetorsion angle of the hip prosthesis, which affects the anterior femoral offset. This study aimed to investigate the effect of an altered antetorsion angle of the implant on the hip moments and gait patterns of the patient. For this study, 13 patients with a conventional stem on one side and a calcar-guided short stem implanted on the contralateral side were included. To determine the maximum hip moment, tests were performed on a dynamometer in extension/flexion and adduction/abduction in addition to gait analysis. As a control, a comparison was made with data from a reference group of 30 healthy subjects. Both implants showed similar symmetry indices. There was a significant difference between the implants for adduction moments (p < 0.001). The ratios between the directions of moments showed no significant differences. The joint function measured by isokinetic measurements and gait analysis remains comparable to the healthy control group after short stem arthroplasty, but shows slight changes after conventional stem arthroplasty.

ACCURACY OF ACETABULAR ALIGNMENT USING INERTIAL AND OPTICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS DURING HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Navigation in total hip arthroplasty has been shown to improve acetabular positioning and can decrease the incidence of mal-positioned acetabular components. The aim of this study was to assess two surgical guidance systems by comparing intra-operative measurements of acetabular component inclination and anteversion with a post-operative CT scan.We prospectively collected intra-operative navigation data from 102 hips receiving conventional THA or hip resurfacing arthroplasty through either a direct anterior or posterior approach. Two guidance systems were used simultaneously: an inertial navigation system (INS) and optical navigation system (ONS). Acetabular component anteversion and inclination was measured on a post-operative CT.The average age of the patients was 64 years (range: 24-92) and average BMI was 27 kg/m2 (range 19-38). 52% had hip surgery through an anterior approach. 98% of the INS measurements and 88% of the ONS measurements were within 10° of the CT measurements. The mean (and standard deviation) of the absolute difference between the post-operative CT and the intra-operative measurements for inclination and anteversion were 3.0° (2.8) and 4.5° (3.2) respectively for the ONS, along with 2.1° (2.3) and 2.4° (2.1) respectively for the INS. There was significantly lower mean absolute difference to CT for the INS when compared to ONS in both anteversion (p&lt;0.001) and inclination (p=0.02).Both types of navigation produced reliable and reproducible acetabular cup positioning. It is important that patient-specific planning and navigation are used together to ensure that surgeons are targeting the optimal acetabular cup position. This assistance with cup positioning can provide benefits over free-hand techniques, especially in patients with an altered acetabular structure or extensive acetabular bone loss.In conclusion, both ONS and INS allowed for adequate acetabular positioning as measured on postoperative CT, and thus provide reliable intraoperative feedback for optimal acetabular component placement.

Accuracy of acetabular component alignment with surgical guidance systems during hip arthroplasty

Navigation in total hip arthroplasty has been shown to improve acetabular positioning and can decrease the incidence of mal-positioned acetabular components. This study aimed to assess two surgical guidance systems by comparing intra-operative measurements of acetabular component inclination and anteversion with a post-operative CT scan. We prospectively collected intra-operative navigation data from 102 hips receiving conventional THA or hip resurfacing arthroplasty through either a direct anterior or posterior approach. Two guidance systems were used simultaneously: an inertial navigation system (INS) and an optical navigation system (ONS). Acetabular component anteversion and inclination were measured on a post-operative CT. The average age of the patients was 64years (range: 24-92) and the average BMI was 27kg/m2 (range 19-38). 52% had hip surgery through an anterior approach. 98% of the INS measurements and 88% of the ONS measurements were within 10° of the CT measurements. The mean (and standard deviation) of the absolute difference between the postoperative CT and the intra-operative measurements for inclination and anteversion were 3.0° (2.8) and 4.5° (3.2) respectively for the ONS, along with 2.1° (2.3) and 2.4° (2.1) respectively for the INS. There was a significantly lower mean absolute difference to CT for the INS when compared to ONS in both anteversions (p<0.001) and inclination (p=0.02). We found that both inertial and optical navigation systems allowed for adequate acetabular positioning as measured on postoperative CT, and thus provide reliable intraoperative feedback for optimal acetabular component placement. Therapeutic Level II.

Dynamic finite element analyses to compare the influences of customised total talar replacement and total ankle arthroplasty on foot biomechanics during gait.

Objective, Total talar replacement (TTR) using a customised talus prosthesis is an emerging surgical alternative to conventional total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for treating ankle problems. Upon satisfying clinical reports in the literature, this study explored the advantages of TTR in restoring foot biomechanics during walking compared with TAA through computational simulations.Methods, A dynamic finite element foot model was built from the MRIs of a healthy participant and modified into two implanted counterparts (TTR and TAA) by incorporating the corresponding prosthetic components into the ankle joint. Twenty bony parts, thirty-nine ligament/tendon units, nine muscle contractors, and bulk soft tissue were included in the intact foot model. The TTR prosthesis was reconstructed from the mirror image data of the participant's contralateral talus and the TAA prosthesis was modelled by reproducing the Scandinavian ankle replacement procedure in the model assembly. The model was meshed with explicit deformable elements and validated against existing experimental studies that have assessed specific walking scenarios. Simulations were performed using the boundary conditions (time-variant matrix of muscle forces, segment orientation, and ground reaction forces) derived from motion capture analyses and musculoskeletal modelling of the participant's walking gait. Outcome variables, including foot kinematics, joint loading, and plantar pressure were reported and compared among the three model conditions.ResultsLinear regression indicated a better agreement between the TTR model and intact foot model in plots of joint motions and foot segment movements during walking (R2 ​= ​0.721–0.993) than between the TAA and intact foot (R2 ​= ​0.623–0.990). TAA reduced talocrural excursion by 21.36%–31.92% and increased (MTP) dorsiflexion by 3.03%. Compared with the intact foot, TTR and TAA increased the midtarsal joint contact force by 17.92% and 10.73% respectively. The proximal-to-distal force transmission within the midfoot was shifted to the lateral column in TTR (94.52% or 210.54 ​N higher) while concentrated on the medial column in TAA (41.58% or 27.55 ​N higher). The TTR produced a plantar pressure map similar to that of the intact foot. TAA caused the plantar pressure centre to drift medially and increased the peak forefoot pressure by 7.36% in the late stance.ConclusionThe TTR better reproduced the foot joint motions, segment movements, and plantar pressure map of an intact foot during walking. TAA reduced ankle mobility while increasing movement of the adjacent joints and forefoot plantar pressure. Both implant methods changed force transmission within the midfoot during gait progression.The translational potential of this article Our work is one of the few to report foot segment movements and the internal loading status of implanted ankles during a dynamic locomotion task. These outcomes partially support the conjecture that TTR is a prospective surgical alternative for pathological ankles from a biomechanical perspective. This study paves the way for further clinical investigations and systematic statistics to confirm the effects of TTR on functional joint recovery.

Implant migration and functional outcome of Reverse Shoulder Lateralized Glenosphere Line Extension System: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundInferior scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The most efficient technique to avoid inferior scapular notching has been reported to be lateralization of the glenoid offset. This study aims to compare radiological and functional outcomes of the DELTA Xtend® Reverse Shoulder System Lateralized Glenosphere Line Extension (intervention group) with the Standard DELTA Xtend® Reverse Shoulder System (control group). We hypothesize that the lateralization improves the patient outcome by decreasing the risk of inferior scapular notching without increasing the risk of migration and loosening of glenoid component.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, all Danish citizens with rotator cuff arthropathy or degeneration of the glenohumeral joint with severe posterior wear and allocated for a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at the department of orthopaedic surgery at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, will be considered for participation. The exclusion criteria are as follows: below 50 years of age, cognitive or linguistic impairment, insufficient glenoid bone stock, previous fracture in the upper extremity and autoimmune-mediated inflammatory arthritis. There will be included a total of 122 patients of which 56 will participate in the radiostereometric analysis. This number of patients allows 20% to drop out. The co-primary outcomes are the pattern and magnitude of the migration of the glenoid component assessed by radiostereometric analysis and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index. The secondary outcomes are inferior scapular notching, patient-reported and functional outcomes (Oxford shoulder score, Constant-Murley score and pain), side effects and complications, changes in bone mineral density and economy. The included patients will be examined before the surgery, within 1 week and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after.DiscussionNo previous studies have compared the conventional reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a randomized controlled trial regarding migration and functional outcome. Furthermore, radiostereometric analysis has not been used to evaluate the migration of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a randomized controlled trial. This study intends to determine which treatment has the most optimal outcome for the benefit of future patients with an indication for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Trial registrationThe study has been notified to Pactius and has approval number P-2021-231. Furthermore, the study will be registered on Clinicaltrials.gov before starting the inclusion.

Patient Interest in Robotic Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Exponential: A 10-Year Google Trends Analysis.

BackgroundThe use of robotics in arthroplasty continues to increase. Patient demand, patient expectations, and patient-directed marketing by industry and care providers each likely contributes to its increasing popularity. Trends in patient interest have not been well described. We used the online Google Trends tool to analyze trends in national public interest toward robotic and nonrobotic arthroplasty between 2011 and 2021.Material and methodsGoogle Trends online was queried for search terms related to nonrobotic hip and knee arthroplasty in addition to robotic hip, robotic knee, and general robotic arthroplasty between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021.ResultsGoogle Trends Data demonstrated a significant linear increase in online searches related to nonrobotic total knee and hip arthroplasty. Online search volume for robotic hip arthroplasty was significant and linear, while that of robotic knee arthroplasty was significant and exponential. When combined, robotic joint arthroplasty demonstrated an exponential trend over the 10-year period. This increase was noted to be statistically significant when compared with nonrobotic arthroplasty search volume.ConclusionOur study demonstrates that public interest in robotic total joint arthroplasty has increased significantly from 2011 through 2020. When compared with online search volume for conventional arthroplasty, this increasing growth is statistically significant. Public interest in robotic arthroplasty is anticipated to continue to increase, and care providers should be aware of this trend that impacts patient perceptions and expectations. Despite significant growth in interest for robotic arthroplasty, there is incomplete evidence supporting its use over nonrobotic arthroplasty. Additional high-quality studies are needed to inform provider decision-making and appropriately guide public interest in robot-assisted arthroplasty.

59 Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement Surgery &amp; Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Aim An increasing proportion of knee arthroplasties are performed using robotic-assisted surgical techniques. While these techniques are associated with shorter lengths of stay, better patient outcomes and lower revision rates, the increase in intra-operative time and requirement for extra instrumentation, such as array pins, may lead to an increased risk of infection. Therefore, this review reports summary rates of surgical site infection (SSIs) in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasties. Method The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane and CINAHL databases were searched from 2004 to November 2020 to reflect modern robotic surgical practice. The primary outcome was overall number of SSIs that occurred within one year of the primary operative procedure, which was sub-classified into either deep or superficial and pin-site infections. Risk of bias was assessed via the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Conventional Q and I2 tests for heterogeneity were performed with subsequent meta-analysis using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Results From 1052 studies identified, 17 were included, of which 13 were deemed to have an overall ‘low’ risk of bias. This review included 4400 unicompartmental and 1883 total knee arthroplasties. The summary rate of overall SSIs within one year of primary robotic knee arthroplasty was 0.568% (SE=0.183, 95% CI=0.209–0.927). This rate fell to 0.154% (SE=0.069, 95% CI=0.018–0.290) for deep infections and 0.347% (SE=0.109, 95% CI=0.133–0.561) for superficial and pin-site infections. Conclusions The rates of surgical site infection were found to be low in robotic knee arthroplasty, however, further research is required to compare outcomes with conventional knee arthroplasty.

Comparison of Robotic and Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Robotic-arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RUKA) was developed to increase the accuracy of bone alignment and implant positioning. This retrospective study explored whether RUKA has more favorable overall outcomes than conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (CUKA). A total of 158 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis were recruited, of which 85 had undergone RUKA with the Mako system and 73 had undergone CUKA. The accuracy of component positioning and bone anatomical alignment was compared using preoperative and postoperative radiograph. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using questionnaires, which the patients completed preoperatively and then postoperatively at six months, one year, and two years. In total, 52 patients from the RUKA group and 61 from the CUKA group were eligible for analysis. The preoperative health scores and Kellgren–Lawrence scores were higher in the RUKA group. RUKA exhibited higher implant positioning accuracy, thus providing a superior femoral implant angle, properly aligned implant placement, and a low rate of overhang. RUKA also achieved higher accuracy in bone anatomical alignment (tibial axis angle and anatomical axis angle) than CUKA, but surgical time was longer, and blood loss was greater. No significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes of the two procedures.