Control Of Chromosome Segregation Research Articles

Developmental signals control chromosome segregation fidelity during pluripotency and neurogenesis by modulating replicative stress

Human development relies on the correct replication, maintenance and segregation of our genetic blueprints. How these processes are monitored across embryonic lineages, and why genomic mosaicism varies during development remain unknown. Using pluripotent stem cells, we identify that several patterning signals—including WNT, BMP, and FGF—converge into the modulation of DNA replication stress and damage during S-phase, which in turn controls chromosome segregation fidelity in mitosis. We show that the WNT and BMP signals protect from excessive origin firing, DNA damage and chromosome missegregation derived from stalled forks in pluripotency. Cell signalling control of chromosome segregation declines during lineage specification into the three germ layers, but re-emerges in neural progenitors. In particular, we find that the neurogenic factor FGF2 induces DNA replication stress-mediated chromosome missegregation during the onset of neurogenesis, which could provide a rationale for the elevated chromosomal mosaicism of the developing brain. Our results highlight roles for morphogens and cellular identity in genome maintenance that contribute to somatic mosaicism during mammalian development.

Meiosis-specific decoupling of the pericentromere from the kinetochore.

The primary constriction site of the M-phase chromosome is an established marker for the kinetochore position, often used to determine the karyotype of each species. Underlying this observation is the concept that the kinetochore is spatially linked with the pericentromere where sister-chromatids are most tightly cohered. Here, we found an unconventional pericentromere specification with sister chromatids mainly cohered at a chromosome end, spatially separated from the kinetochore in Peromyscus mouse oocytes. This distal locus enriched cohesin protectors, such as the Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) and PP2A, at a higher level compared to its centromere/kinetochore region, acting as the primary site for sister-chromatid cohesion. Chromosomes with the distal cohesion site exhibited enhanced cohesin protection at anaphase I compared to those without it, implying that these distal cohesion sites may have evolved to ensure sister-chromatid cohesion during meiosis. In contrast, mitotic cells enriched CPC only near the kinetochore and the distal locus was not cohered between sister chromatids, suggesting a meiosis-specific mechanism to protect cohesin at this distal locus. We found that this distal locus corresponds to an additional centromeric satellite block, located far apart from the centromeric satellite block that builds the kinetochore. Several Peromyscus species carry chromosomes with two such centromeric satellite blocks. Analyses on three Peromyscus species revealed that the internal satellite consistently assembles the kinetochore in both mitosis and meiosis, whereas the distal satellite selectively enriches cohesin protectors in meiosis to promote sister-chromatid cohesion at that site. Thus, our study demonstrates that pericentromere specification is remarkably flexible and can control chromosome segregation in a cell-type and context dependent manner.

Chromosome Division in Early Embryos-Is Everything under Control? And Is the Cell Size Important?

Chromosome segregation in female germ cells and early embryonic blastomeres is known to be highly prone to errors. The resulting aneuploidy is therefore the most frequent cause of termination of early development and embryo loss in mammals. And in specific cases, when the aneuploidy is actually compatible with embryonic and fetal development, it leads to severe developmental disorders. The main surveillance mechanism, which is essential for the fidelity of chromosome segregation, is the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC). And although all eukaryotic cells carry genes required for SAC, it is not clear whether this pathway is active in all cell types, including blastomeres of early embryos. In this review, we will summarize and discuss the recent progress in our understanding of the mechanisms controlling chromosome segregation and how they might work in embryos and mammalian embryos in particular. Our conclusion from the current literature is that the early mammalian embryos show limited capabilities to react to chromosome segregation defects, which might, at least partially, explain the widespread problem of aneuploidy during the early development in mammals.

Activity of MukBEF for chromosome management in E. coli and its inhibition by MatP.

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes share conserved structures and serve a common role in maintaining chromosome architecture. In the bacterium Escherichia coli, the SMC complex MukBEF is necessary for rapid growth and the accurate segregation and positioning of the chromosome, although the specific molecular mechanisms involved are still unknown. Here, we used a number of in vivo assays to reveal how MukBEF controls chromosome conformation and how the MatP/matS system prevents MukBEF activity. Our results indicate that the loading of MukBEF occurs preferentially on newly replicated DNA, at multiple loci on the chromosome where it can promote long-range contacts in cis even though MukBEF can promote long-range contacts in the absence of replication. Using Hi-C and ChIP-seq analyses in strains with rearranged chromosomes, the prevention of MukBEF activity increases with the number of matS sites and this effect likely results from the unloading of MukBEF by MatP. Altogether, our results reveal how MukBEF operates to control chromosome folding and segregation in E. coli.

Activity of MukBEF for chromosome management in E. coli and its inhibition by MatP

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes share conserved structures and serve a common role in maintaining chromosome architecture. In the bacterium Escherichia coli, the SMC complex MukBEF is necessary for rapid growth and the accurate segregation and positioning of the chromosome, although the specific molecular mechanisms involved are still unknown. Here, we used a number of in vivo assays to reveal how MukBEF controls chromosome conformation and how the MatP/matS system prevents MukBEF activity. Our results indicate that the loading of MukBEF occurs preferentially on newly replicated DNA, at multiple loci on the chromosome where it can promote long-range contacts in cis even though MukBEF can promote long-range contacts in the absence of replication. Using Hi-C and ChIP-seq analyses in strains with rearranged chromosomes, the prevention of MukBEF activity increases with the number of matS sites and this effect likely results from the unloading of MukBEF by MatP. Altogether, our results reveal how MukBEF operates to control chromosome folding and segregation in E. coli.

BUB-1 and CENP-C recruit PLK-1 to control chromosome alignment and segregation during meiosis I in C. elegans oocytes.

Phosphorylation is a key post-translational modification that is utilised in many biological processes for the rapid and reversible regulation of protein localisation and activity. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK-1) is essential for both mitotic and meiotic cell divisions, with key functions being conserved in eukaryotes. The roles and regulation of PLK-1 during mitosis have been well characterised. However, the discrete roles and regulation of PLK-1 during meiosis have remained obscure. Here, we used Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes to show that PLK-1 plays distinct roles in meiotic spindle assembly and/or stability, chromosome alignment and segregation, and polar body extrusion during meiosis I. Furthermore, by a combination of live imaging and biochemical analysis we identified the chromosomal recruitment mechanisms of PLK-1 during C. elegans oocyte meiosis. The spindle assembly checkpoint kinase BUB-1 directly recruits PLK-1 to the kinetochore and midbivalent while the chromosome arm population of PLK-1 depends on a direct interaction with the centromeric-associated protein CENP-CHCP-4. We found that perturbing both BUB-1 and CENP-CHCP-4 recruitment of PLK-1 leads to severe meiotic defects, resulting in highly aneuploid oocytes. Overall, our results shed light on the roles played by PLK-1 during oocyte meiosis and provide a mechanistic understanding of PLK-1 targeting to meiotic chromosomes.

Mitotic Checkpoint Imbalances in Familial Cancer

Numerical chromosomal aberrations are highly frequent in cancer cells. However, tumor-associated mutations in regulators of the mitotic machinery that controls chromosome segregation are rather rare. By sequencing families with hereditary cancer, Chen and colleagues report two novel heterozygous mutations in CDC20, a coactivator of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) and a target of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) that prevents chromosome missegregation during mitosis. CDC20 mutations result in partial SAC functionality and segregate with tumor susceptibility in families with aneuploid ovarian cancers and other malignancies. The expression of these mutations in a knock-in mouse model accelerates the development of Myc-induced lymphomas and mortality, strongly supporting the notion that partial dysfunction of mitotic regulators may have profound implications in spontaneous and hereditary cancer. See related article by Chen et al., p. 3499.

NAT10 regulates mitotic cell fate by acetylating Eg5 to control bipolar spindle assembly and chromosome segregation.

Cell fate of mitotic cell is controlled by spindle assembly. Deficient spindle assembly results in mitotic catastrophe leading to cell death to maintain cellular homeostasis. Therefore, inducing mitotic catastrophe provides a strategy for tumor therapy. Nucleolar acetyltransferase NAT10 has been found to regulate various cellular processes to maintain cell homeostasis. Here we report that NAT10 regulates mitotic cell fate by acetylating Eg5. NAT10 depletion results in multinuclear giant cells, which is the hallmark of mitotic catastrophe. Live-cell imaging showed that knockdown of NAT10 dramatically prolongs the mitotic time and induces defective chromosome segregation including chromosome misalignment, bridge and lagging. NAT10 binds and co-localizes with Eg5 in the centrosome during mitosis. Depletion of NAT10 reduces the centrosome loading of Eg5 and impairs the poleward movement of centrosome, leading to monopolar and asymmetrical spindle formation. Furthermore, NAT10 stabilizes Eg5 through its acetyltransferase function. NAT10 acetylates Eg5 at K771 to control Eg5 stabilization. We generated K771-Ac specific antibody and showed that Eg5 K771-Ac specifically localizes in the centrosome during mitosis. Additionally, K771 acetylation is required for the motor function of Eg5. The hyper-acetylation mimic Flag-Eg5 K771Q but not Flag-Eg5 rescued the NAT10 depletion-induced defective spindle formation and mitotic catastrophe, demonstrating that NAT10 controls mitosis through acetylating Eg5 K771. Collectively, we identify Eg5 as an important substrate of NAT10 in the control of mitosis and provide K771 as an essential acetylation site in the stabilization and motor function of Eg5. Our findings reveal that targeting the NAT10-mediated Eg5 K771 acetylation provides a potential strategy for tumor therapy.

Centrosome maturation - in tune with the cell cycle.

Centrosomes are the main microtubule-organizing centres, playing essential roles in the organization of the cytoskeleton during interphase, and in the mitotic spindle, which controls chromosome segregation, during cell division. Centrosomes also act as the basal body of cilia, regulating cilium length and affecting extracellular signal reception as well as the integration of intracellular signalling pathways. Centrosomes are self-replicative and duplicate once every cell cycle to generate two centrosomes. The core support structure of the centrosome consists of two molecularly distinct centrioles. The mother (mature) centriole exhibits accessory appendages and is surrounded by both pericentriolar material and centriolar satellites, structures that the daughter (immature) centriole lacks. In this Review, we discuss what is currently known about centrosome duplication, its dialogue with the cell cycle and the sequential acquisition of specific components during centriole maturation. We also describe our current understanding of the mature centriolar structures that are required to build a cilium. Altogether, the built-in centrosome asymmetries that stem from the two centrosomes inheriting molecularly different centrioles sets the foundation for cell division being an intrinsically asymmetric process.

Heat shock factor 1 suppression induces spindle abnormalities and sensitizes cells to antimitotic drugs

BackgroundHeat shock factor 1 (HSF1) is the master regulator of the heat shock response and supports malignant cell transformation. Recent work has shown that HSF1 can access the promoters of heat shock proteins (HSPs) and allow HSP expression during mitosis. It also acts as a mitotic regulator, controlling chromosome segregation. In this study, we investigated whether the transactivation activity of HSF1 is required for the assembly of mitotic spindles.ResultsOur results showed that phosphorylation of HSF1 at serine 326 (S326) and its transactivation activity were increased during mitosis. Inhibition of the transactivation activity of HSF1 by KRIBB11 or CCT251263 during mitosis significantly increased the proportion of mitotic cells with abnormal spindles. It also hampered the reassembly of spindle microtubules after nocodazole treatment and washout by impeding the formation of chromosomal microtubule asters. Depletion of HSF1 led to defects in mitotic spindle assembly, subsequently attenuating cell proliferation and anchorage-independent cell growth (AIG). These HSF1 depletion-induced effects could be rescued by ectopically expressing wild-type HSF1 or a constitutively active mutant (∆202-316, caHSF1) but not the S326A or dominant negative (∆361-529, dnHSF1) mutants. In addition, overexpression of HSP70 partially reduced HSF1 depletion-induced spindle abnormalities. These results indicate that HSF1 may support cell proliferation and AIG by maintaining spindle integrity through its transactivation activity. Furthermore, inhibition of HSF1 transactivation activity by KRIBB11 or CCT251236 can enhance diverse anti-mitosis drug-induced spindle defects and cell death.ConclusionsThe increased transactivation activity of HSF1 during mitosis appears to be required for accurate assembly of mitotic spindles, thereby supporting cell viability and probably AIG. In addition, inhibition of the transactivation activity of HSF1 may enhance the mitotic errors and cell death induced by anti-mitosis drugs.

Cell-cycle phospho-regulation of the kinetochore.

The kinetochore is a mega-dalton protein assembly that forms within centromeric regions of chromosomes and directs their segregation during cell division. Here we review cell cycle-mediated phosphorylation events at the kinetochore, with a focus on the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the insight gained from forced associations of kinases and phosphatases. The point centromeres found in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae are one of the simplest such structures found in eukaryotes. The S. cerevisiae kinetochore comprises a single nucleosome, containing a centromere-specific H3 variant Cse4CENP-A, bound to a set of kinetochore proteins that connect to a single microtubule. Despite the simplicity of the budding yeast kinetochore, the proteins are mostly homologous with their mammalian counterparts. In some cases, human proteins can complement their yeast orthologs. Like its mammalian equivalent, the regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore is complex: integrating signals from the cell cycle, checkpoints, error correction, and stress pathways. The regulatory signals from these diverse pathways are integrated at the kinetochore by post-translational modifications, notably phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, to control chromosome segregation. Here we highlight the complex interplay between the activity of the different cell-cycle kinases and phosphatases at the kinetochore, emphasizing how much more we have to understand this essential structure.

A fraction of barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF) associates with centromeres and controls mitosis progression

Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF) is a conserved nuclear envelope (NE) component that binds chromatin and helps its anchoring to the NE. Cycles of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation control BAF function. Entering mitosis, phosphorylation releases BAF from chromatin and facilitates NE-disassembly. At mitotic exit, PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation restores chromatin binding and nucleates NE-reassembly. Here, we show that in Drosophila a small fraction of BAF (cenBAF) associates with centromeres. We also find that PP4 phosphatase, which is recruited to centromeres by CENP-C, prevents phosphorylation and release of cenBAF during mitosis. cenBAF is necessary for proper centromere assembly and accurate chromosome segregation, being critical for mitosis progression. Disrupting cenBAF localization prevents PP2A inactivation in mitosis compromising global BAF phosphorylation, which in turn leads to its persistent association with chromatin, delays anaphase onset and causes NE defects. These results suggest that, together with PP4 and CENP-C, cenBAF forms a centromere-based mechanism that controls chromosome segregation and mitosis progression.

Killing two birds with one stone: how budding yeast Mps1 controls chromosome segregation and spindle assembly checkpoint through phosphorylation of a single kinetochore protein.

During mitosis, the identical sister chromatids of each chromosome must attach through their kinetochores to microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles. This process, referred to as chromosome biorientation, is essential for equal partitioning of the genetic information to the two daughter cells. Defects in chromosome biorientation can give rise to aneuploidy, a hallmark of cancer and genetic diseases. A conserved surveillance mechanism called spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) prevents the onset of anaphase until biorientation is attained. Key to chromosome biorientation is an error correction mechanism that allows kinetochores to establish proper bipolar attachmentsby disengaging faulty kinetochore-microtubule connections. Error correction relies on the Aurora B and Mps1 kinases that also promote SAC signaling, raising the possibility that they are part of a single sensory device responding to improper attachments and concomitantly controlling both their disengagement and a temporary mitotic arrest. In budding yeast, Aurora B and Mps1 promote error correction independently from one another, but while the substrates of Aurora B in this process are at least partially known, the mechanism underlying the involvement of Mps1 in the error correction pathway is unknown. Through the characterization of a novel mps1 mutant and an unbiased genetic screen for extragenic suppressors, we recently gained evidence that a common mechanism based on Mps1-dependent phosphorylation of the Knl1/Spc105 kinetochore scaffold and subsequent recruitment of the Bub1 kinase is critical for the function of Mps1 in chromosome biorientation as well as for SAC activation (Benzi et al. EMBO Rep, 2020).

Ensemble-Level Organization of Human Kinetochores and Evidence for Distinct Tension and Attachment Sensors

SummaryKinetochores are multi-protein machines that form dynamic attachments to microtubules and control chromosome segregation. High fidelity is ensured because kinetochores can monitor attachment status and tension, using this information to activate checkpoints and error-correction mechanisms. To explore how kinetochores achieve this, we used two- and three-color subpixel fluorescence localization to define how proteins from six major complexes (CCAN, MIS12, NDC80, KNL1, RZZ, and SKA) and the checkpoint proteins Bub1, Mad1, and Mad2 are organized in the human kinetochore. This reveals how the outer kinetochore has a high nematic order and is largely invariant to the loss of attachment or tension, except for two mechanical sensors. First, Knl1 unravels to relay tension, and second, NDC80 undergoes jackknifing and loss of nematic order under microtubule detachment, with only the latter wired up to the checkpoint signaling system. This provides insight into how kinetochores integrate mechanical signals to promote error-free chromosome segregation.

Investigating Oncogenic Roles of Long Intergenic Non‐Protein Coding RNA 461 (LINC00461) in HDAC6‐Mediated Glioblastoma Malignancy

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most complex, difficult‐to‐treat, aggressive, and lethal type of brain tumor. Thus, studies are urgently needed to determine the molecular mechanisms of GBM malignancy and develop novel concepts for treating the disease. According to our previous study, the selective histone deacetylase 1, 2, 6 (HDAC1, 2, 6) inhibitor MPT0B291 prevents the development of temozolomide (TMZ) resistance in GBM cells and prolongs the survival of mice bearing orthotopic GBM xenografts. Although HDACs are known to regulate the balance of lysine acetylation on histones and nonhistone substrates, the role of HDACs in regulating long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) affecting GBM malignancy remains unclear. By performing microarray analysis, we identified an evolutionary conserved lncRNA LINC00461 that was clearly reduced by MPT0B291 in both TMZ‐resistant GBM cells and stem‐like tumorspheres. Additionally, we found that LINC00461 depletion suppressed GBM cell proliferation via G1 phase arrest. Because the miRNA‐411‐5p/topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) axis is known as a target of LINC00461 for controlling chromosome segregation during mitosis, we examined the TOP2A levels and verified that both MPT0B291 treatment and LINC00461 silencing caused dramatic decreases in TOP2A expression. Furthermore, we identified the interaction between HDAC6 and subunit 6 of CCR4‐NOT exoribonuclease complex (CNOT6), an acetylation‐activated deadenylase that promotes RNA degradation. In conclusion, this study will increase the understanding of the role of LINC00461 in GBM malignant properties and reveal whether targeting the HDACs/CCR4‐NOT/LINC00461 axis and its downstream effectors with a selective inhibitor is an effective therapeutic strategy against GBMs.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106‐6601‐003‐112_15060508367900001 & 107‐6601‐004‐112_15553117427110001).

Meiosis-Specific Functions of Kinesin Motors in Cohesin Removal and Maintenance of Chromosome Integrity in Budding Yeast.

Kinesin motors provide the molecular forces at the kinetochore-microtubule interface and along the spindle to control chromosome segregation. During meiosis with two rounds of microtubule assembly-disassembly, the roles of motor proteins remain unexplored. We observed that in contrast to mitosis, Cin8 and Kip3 together are indispensable for meiosis. While examining meiosis in cin8Δ kip3Δ cells, we detected chromosome breakage in the meiosis II cells. The double mutant exhibits a delay in cohesin removal during anaphase I. Consequently, some cells fail to undergo meiosis II and form dyads, while some, as they progress through meiosis II, cause a defect in chromosome integrity. We believe that in the latter cells, an imbalance of spindle-mediated force and the simultaneous persistence of cohesin on chromosomes cause their breakage. We provide evidence that tension generated by Cin8 and Kip3 through microtubule cross-linking is essential for signaling efficient cohesin removal and the maintenance of chromosome integrity during meiosis.

A stochastic model for protein localization in Caulobacter crescentus bacterium

Caulobacter crescentus bacterial cells use a minimal three component Par partition system to segregate DNA during asymmetric division. Precise division plane placement is tightly controlled by MipZ protein gradients that are thought to interact with Par proteins. How these complex protein interactions generate precise measurements in the face of stochastic fluctuations is of significant interest. Here, we first developed a detailed computational model used to study key interactions between Par and MipZ proteins that control chromosome segregation. In addition, we developed a minimal intermittent-search model that captured key ParB/ParA interactions in support of chromosome copy movement. Lastly, we found the competition between ParA and MipZ proteins for ParB complex binding sites to be sufficient in order to generate experimentally observed MipZ bipolar gradients. Our models provide a framework to study how the movement of the DNA copy could communicate with the division site placement proteins in Caulobacter crescentus cells.

Downregulation of lumican enhanced mitotic defects and aneuploidy in lung cancer cells

ABSTRACT Lumican is overexpressed in lung cancer cells and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of tumorigenesis and regulation of cancer cell invasion. Lumican is robustly associated with the binding of p120-catenin protein to modulate cell metastasis. However, its role in cancer cell proliferation is still unclear. This study investigated the effect of lumican on the cell division including mitosis and cytokinesis in non-small lung cancer cells. We found that the downregulation of lumican prolonged the doubling time of cells and retarded the cell growth in H460 and A549 cells. Along with tubulin, lumican localized to the mitotic spindle and centrosome during the metaphase-anaphase stage. The cell cycle was retained in the G2/M phase after the downregulation of lumican. Interestingly, lumican was found to play important roles in central spindle and midbody formation during cytokinesis. Lumican interacted with the midbody-associated proteins such as MKLP1, Aurora B, and ECT2. Notably, the downregulation of lumican decreased the level of MKLP1 accompanied by the retention of midbody-residual that resulted in multi-nucleated cells. Downregulation of lumican promoted the chromosome missegregation and the increment of the bi-/multinucleated cells. The results of this study indicated that lumican associated with tubulin is crucial for spindle fiber formation and midbody assembly in cell division. Downregulation of lumican displayed the defects in mitotic spindle assembly/dynamics and improper kinetochore-microtubules attachment that led to increase aneuploidy. This emerging property of lumican is suggested to tightly control chromosome segregation during cell division in lung cancer cells. Abbreviations: ESCRT: endosomal sorting complex required for transport; PRC1: protein regulator of cytokinesis 1; Nci: negative control siRNA; Lumi: lumican siRNAs; MKLP1: mitotic kinesin-like protein 1; H460LD and A549LD: H460 and A549 cell lines with less expressed lumican

Aneuploidy-inducing gene knockdowns overlap with cancer mutations and identify Orp3 as a B-cell lymphoma suppressor.

Aneuploidy can instigate tumorigenesis. However, mutations in genes that control chromosome segregation are rare in human tumors as these mutations reduce cell fitness. Screening experiments indicate that the knockdown of multiple classes of genes that are not directly involved in chromosome segregation can lead to aneuploidy induction. The possible contribution of these genes to cancer formation remains yet to be defined. Here we identified gene knockdowns that lead to an increase in aneuploidy in checkpoint-deficient human cancer cells. Computational analysis revealed that the identified genes overlap with recurrent mutations in human cancers. The knockdown of the three strongest selected candidate genes (ORP3, GJB3, and RXFP1) enhances the malignant transformation of human fibroblasts in culture. Furthermore, the knockout of Orp3 results in an aberrant expansion of lymphoid progenitor cells and a high penetrance formation of chromosomal instable, pauci-clonal B-cell lymphoma in aging mice. At pre-tumorous stages, lymphoid cells from the animals exhibit deregulated phospholipid metabolism and an aberrant induction of proliferation regulating pathways associating with increased aneuploidy in hematopoietic progenitor cells. Together, these results support the concept that aneuploidy-inducing gene deficiencies contribute to cellular transformation and carcinogenesis involving the deregulation of various molecular processes such as lipid metabolism, proliferation, and cell survival.

Trapping of the transport-segment DNA by the ATPase domains of a type II topoisomerase

Type II topoisomerases alter DNA topology to control DNA supercoiling and chromosome segregation and are targets of clinically important anti-infective and anticancer therapeutics. They act as ATP-operated clamps to trap a DNA helix and transport it through a transient break in a second DNA. Here, we present the first X-ray crystal structure solved at 2.83 Å of a closed clamp complete with trapped T-segment DNA obtained by co-crystallizing the ATPase domain of S. pneumoniae topoisomerase IV with a nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue and 14-mer duplex DNA. The ATPase dimer forms a 22 Å protein hole occupied by the kinked DNA bound asymmetrically through positively charged residues lining the hole, and whose mutagenesis impacts the DNA decatenation, DNA relaxation and DNA-dependent ATPase activities of topo IV. These results and a side-bound DNA-ParE structure help explain how the T-segment DNA is captured and transported by a type II topoisomerase, and reveal a new enzyme–DNA interface for drug discovery.