Source: Szefler SJ, Phillips BR, Martinez FD, et al for the Childhood Asthma Research and Education Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Characterization of within-subject responses to fluticasone and montelukast in childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115:233–242.Currently, 2 classes of controller medications are commonly used in children with persistent asthma: inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA). Little work has been done to characterize the phenotypic features of children with asthma that respond to both, one, or neither of the medication classes. To address this question, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) funded a Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network multi-center, double-masked trial. In this investigation, 144 children ages 6 to 17 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma were randomized to 1 of 2 crossover sequences. Both sequences included 8 weeks of an active ICS (fluticasone 100 mcg BID) plus an oral placebo, and 8 weeks of an inhaled placebo plus age-appropriate doses of an LTRA (montelukast, 5 mg for those ages 6 to 14 years and 10 mg for 15- to 18-year-old children). Because the study utilized a crossover design, it allowed for within-subject characterization of children that responded to both, neither, or only one of the study drugs.In the 126 patients that successfully completed this investigation, the mean improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 6.8% for fluticasone and 1.9% for montelukast. Importantly, a response to a medication was defined as an improvement in FEV1 of 7.5%. Seventeen percent of participants achieved this threshold with both medications, while 23% responded to fluticasone only and 5% responded to montelukast only. Fifty-five percent responded to neither.In characterizing those that responded better to one drug over the other, the investigators reported that patients with higher baseline levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), total eosinophil count, eosinophilic cationic protein, and IgE, and lower baseline levels on pulmonary function testing responded better to fluticasone compared to those who responded to neither medication. Subjects responding to montelukast were younger and had a shorter duration of asthma than those responding to neither drug. Finally, the subjects who responded to both medications had higher levels of urinary leukotrienes and poorer baseline lung function on pulmonary function testing than those who responded to neither drug. One other notable finding was that while only 2 children developed acute asthma exacerbations that required oral steroids while receiving active fluticasone plus oral placebo, 10 required oral steroids while receiving montelukast and no active ICS.The investigators concluded that while a large portion of the children with persistent asthma had similar responses to both medications, children with low pulmonary function or markers indicative of allergic inflammation are more likely to respond to ICS. Alternatively, those without such features may benefit from a trial of either class of medication.Dr. Paul is a co-investigator with the Data Coordinating Center (DCC) for the Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE) Network, but he is not a co-author on this study. Dr. Paul has not disclosed any financial relationships relevant to this commentary.The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program’s Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma published by the NHBLI give evidence-based guidance on the use of controller medications for the treatment of persistent asthma.1,2 Future versions of these guidelines will likely reflect the future of therapeutics, which will shift from population-based to individual-based treatment. Individualized therapy will rely on investigations like the one summarized above to incorporate a patient’s disease phenotype and genotype into medical decision-making. While many of the tests used to characterize the asthma phenotypes described in this asthma study are not yet widely available or accessible to clinicians, they may be in the near future.In this study, the advantage goes to ICS over LTRA, but that is based on one FEV1 measurement at the end of an 8-week trial of one of these medications. The reliability of a single test of pulmonary function as an outcome measure is questionable. In addition, the authors did not assess whether there was a synergistic effect of the full monte: that is, combined therapy with a LTRA such as montelukast and inhaled steroid.
Read full abstract