Controlled Flight Into Terrain Research Articles

DESIGN AND MODELLING OF GROUND PROXIMITY WARNING SYSTEM (GPWS) FOR TRAINING AID

Controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) is the most common type of aircraft crashes in the world of aviation today. Following the sheer volume of terrain collisions, there was an introduction of CFIT classification to enable the grouping into one category of all crashes involving aircrafts colliding with terrains. To avert CFIT accidents, the Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) was introduced onboard the aircraft for the flight crew to be aware of the moment the aircraft is approaching a ground terrain via automatic and very distinct acoustic warning. This paper presents a digital display ground proximity warning system as a teaching aid with audio prompt using ultrasonic sensor to produce forward distance from aircraft to obstacle ahead, height, inclination of aircraft in relation to its terrain beneath the aircraft and a digital computer interface for instrument visualization for better performance using graphic user interface (GUI) thereby enabling clearer understanding on GPWS. The Arduino IDE using Arduino sketch and C language were used on the Arduino Uno. The aircraft was integrated with different electronic modules which includes Arduino single board, Ultrasonic sensor, accelerometer and transceiver module, and all these uses the Arduino to read the signal from the sensor, processes and transmit to the base station wirelessly via radio frequency. Simulation results indicates that the responses of the models are a replica of the actual aircraft operations.

Risk assessment method for controlled flight into terrain of airlines based on QAR data

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess the risk of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) for airlines and to develop a practical method for evaluating and predicting CFIT risk to ensure safe and efficient airline operations.Design/methodology/approachIn accordance with the monitoring project specification issued by the Flight Standards Department of the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC), a preliminary draft of evaluation indicators for CFIT risk was developed based on the literature review and semi-structured interviews. Fifteen aviation experts were then selected and invited to participate in a Delphi method to revise the draft. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method were used to determine the combined weight of the indicators. The variable fuzzy set model and quick access recorder (QAR) data were applied to evaluate the CFIT risk of an airline from 2007 to 2018, and the classification results were compared with actual operational data.FindingsThe research findings reveal that the six most significant monitoring items affecting CFIT risk are incorrect configuration settings during landing, loss of altitude during climbing, ground proximity warning, G/S deviation, flap extension delay during landing and incorrect takeoff configuration. The CFIT risk of airlines has shown an increasing trend since 2015. The values in 2010, 2017 and 2018 were greater than 2 and less than 2.5, indicating that the CFIT risk is at Level 2, close to Level 3, and the risk is low but approaching medium.Practical implicationsUsing the combination weight determined by AHP and entropy weight method to rank the weight of 15 monitoring items, airlines can take necessary measures (simulator training, knowledge training) to reduce the occurrence of monitoring items with high weight to reduce CFIT risk. This risk assessment method can quantitatively evaluate the CFIT risk of airlines and provide theoretical guidance and technical support for airlines to formulate safety management measures and flight training programs, enabling the interconnection between QAR data and flight quality.Originality/valueThe proposed method in this study differs from traditional approaches by offering a quantitative assessment of CFIT risk for airlines and enabling the interconnection between QAR data and flight quality.

Recent Advancements in Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) Prevention

A properly operating aircraft can experience a controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), which is a type of aviation mishap that causes the loss of life and property when it crashes into land or water. The aviation industry has been very concerned about CFIT accidents, and great efforts have been made to avoid them. The most current developments in CFIT prevention are summarised in this research paper. The study analyses existing CFIT prevention technologies, such as enhanced ground proximity warning systems (EGPWS), synthetic vision systems (SVS), and terrain awareness and warning systems (TAWS). It also looks at the possibility of cutting-edge technologies to improve CFIT prevention, such as automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) and satellite-based augmentation systems (SBAS). The use of CFIT prevention technologies in different aircraft types is discussed in the paper, which also emphasises how effective these systems are at lowering CFIT accidents. It also examines the difficulties and constraints involved in putting CFIT prevention technologies into practice, such as the requirement for appropriate training and the expense of equipment. In order to further improve aviation safety, the paper emphasises the significance of ongoing study and development of CFIT prevention technologies. The use of these technologies can greatly lower the occurrence of CFIT accidents and increase the safety of air travel, especially when combined with pilot training and situational awareness.

A Hybrid Model Integrating HFACS and BN for Analyzing Human Factors in CFIT Accidents

Controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) is considered a typical accident category of “low-probability-high consequence”. Human factors play an important role in CFIT accidents in such a complex and high-risk system. This study aims to explore the causal relationship and inherent correlation of CFIT accidents by the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) and Bayesian network (BN). A total of 74 global CFIT accident investigation reports from 2001 to 2020 were collected, and the main contributing factors were classified and analyzed based on the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Then, the model was transformed into a Bayesian network topology structure. To ensure accuracy, the prior probability of each root node was computed by the fuzzy number theory. Afterward, using the bidirectional reasoning ability of the Bayesian network under uncertainty, this study performed a systematic quantitative analysis of the controlled flight into terrain accidents, including causal reasoning analysis, diagnostic analysis, sensitivity analysis, most probable explanation, and scenario analysis. The results demonstrate that the precondition for unsafe acts (30.5%) has the greatest impact on the controlled flight into terrain accidents among the four levels of contributing factors. Inadequate supervision, intentional noncompliance with SOPs/cross-check, GPWS not installed or failure, adverse meteorological environment, and ground-based navigation aid malfunction or not being available are recognized as the top significant contributing factors. The contributing factors of the high sensitivity and most likely failure are identified, and the coupling effect between the different contributing factors is verified. This study can provide guidance for CFIT accident analysis and prevention.

Flight safety level improvement methodology based on the pilot model

Despite the regular efforts on the part of national regulators, the International Civil Aviation Organization and the International Air Transport Association (ICAO and IATA), as well as on the developers of aeronautical equipment, the vast majority of accidents and incidents continue to occur due to the human factor. With the course of time, aircraft design and reliability are steadily and significantly improving, nevertheless, the number of aviation accidents is happening more and more frequently, including accidents with serviceable aircraft. Considerable evidence is the fact that a Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) remains one of the most common causes of aviation accidents. This is specified by a wide variety of problems that require the search for complex, interconnected solutions. Among these issues it is necessary to highlight the increasing sophistication of the aircraft as a technical system, as well as practically unchanged for more than half a century approaches to pilots training for the type and maintaining their qualifications based on pre-defined scenarios taking into consideration the previous experience of aircraft operation. One of the possible ways out of the situation may be the introduction of so-called concept of personnel training relying on the evidence-based training analysis (EBT) based not on the pursue to memorize a certain list of exercises but to develop each particular pilot’s skills and competences that could help him cope with any unpredictable situation. The key feature of EBT lies in refocusing on the analysis of original causes of unsuccessful maneuvers (actions of the pilot) primarily in order to correct the wrong actions instead of repeatedly complying with the "correct sequence of actions". In this regard, the tools providing a continuous analysis of the pilot's actions to identify errors for the purpose of realigning (forming) the pilot's professional competencies in due time, are of paramount importance. The article describes the content of the methodology representing an ultimate goal to develop recommendations aimed at improving pilot’s expertise based on generalized and personalized models of the pilot, as well as solving the inverse problem of flight dynamics using a comparative assessment of a particular pilot piloting quality.

CFIT PREVENTION WITH COMBINED ENHANCED FLIGHT VISION SYSTEM AND SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEM

This paper aims to combine two vision systems as a new technology to suggest the improvement in the continuing problem of Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) accidents. A combined enhanced flight vision system and synthetic vision system seems to hold the solution, while it unhesitatingly accommodated to the commercial and General aviation instrument environment if pilots are getting minimal instrument training. This research shows the benefit of combined enhanced flight vision and synthetic vision systems based on analysis of the accident that occurred in 2013 on approach at Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport. It is shown that the use of a combined system, could have prevented this accident. The head-up display is taken to facilitate this technology to the pilot to be able to see and read accurately using sky lenses.

A Ranking Method to Prioritize VFR Airports to be Provided with Instrument Approach Procedures

The primary purpose of this work is to investigate the necessity of a more comprehensive and systematic method to prioritize airports to be provided with instrument approaches and landing procedures in the Brazilian air transportation landscape. First, an overview of the main contributors to risks associated with the approach and landing phases is provided, covering the most critical aspects of unstable approaches and controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) events. Second, considering the emergence of Terrain Awareness and Alerting Systems (TAWS), the role of its contribution to safety is discussed and the certification context related to the design, installation, and operation of those systems. A ranking method is developed based on the analysis of TAWS alert events in several Brazilian airports. The technique results in a ranking list of airports eligible for instrument procedures and points to objective means to improve safety, accessibility, and efficiency on the flight operations to those locations.

Human Mirror Neuron System Based Alarms in the Cockpit: A Neuroergonomic Evaluation.

Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) events still remain among the deadliest accidents in aviation. When facing the possible occurrence of such an event, pilots have to immediately react to the ground proximity alarm ("Pull Up" alarm) in order to avoid the impending collision. However, the pilots' reaction to this alarm is not always optimal. This may be at least partly due to the low visual saliency of the current alarm and the deleterious effects of stress that alleviate the pilot's reactions. In the present study, two experiments (in a laboratory and in a flight simulator) were conducted to (1)investigate whether hand gesture videos (a hand pulling back the sidestick) can trigger brainwave frequencies related to the mirror neuron system; (2)determine whether enhancing the visual characteristics of the "Pull Up" alarm could improve pilots' response times. Electrophysiological results suggest that hand gesture videos attracted more participants' attention (greater alpha desynchronization in the parieto-occipital area) and possibly triggered greater activity of the mirror neuron system (greater mu and beta desynchronizations at central electrodes). Results obtained in theflight simulator revealed that enhancing the visual characteristics of the original "Pull Up" alarm improved the pilots' reaction times. However, no significant difference in reaction times between an enlarged "Pull Up" inscription and the hand gesture video was found. Further work is needed to determine whether mirror neuron system based alarms could bring benefits for flight safety, in particular, these alarms should be assessed during a high stress context.

A fuzzy inference approach to analysis of LPV-200 procedures influence on air traffic safety

Introducing new technical and organizational solutions in air transport requires demonstrating that the level of safety will not be reduced. The LPV-200 (Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance) approach for landing procedures represent a great opportunity for development of small, poorly equipped airports, as they permit precise landing without costly investment in the ILS (Instrument Landing System). The aim of this paper is to assess the effects of the introduction of LPV-200 procedures for air traffic safety which was determined by the probability of a CFIT (Controlled Flight Into Terrain) accident – PoC. Factors affecting PoC are of a diverse nature, some of which are subjective and cannot be expressed precisely. Therefore, PoC assessment uses fuzzy logic methods, and more specifically hierarchical fuzzy inference systems, with a knowledge base obtained from experts. As a result of simulation experiments, PoC was determined for airports with various levels of navigational equipment. It was also found that the introduction of LPV-200 procedures allows the reduction of PoC, with the highest effect being achieved for the least equipped airports. Also, in the event of failure of the main approach assistance system ILS, the use of LPV-200 procedures allows maintaining PoC at the same or close to the basic value level. The results of our research indicate that the introduction of LPV-200 procedures is clearly positive for the commercial use of small, less equipped aerodromes. We have shown that thanks to employing LPV-200 procedures it is possible to keep the PoC at a level similar to typical commercial airports.

An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 2017

Introduction: Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) account for a considerable amount of fatalities when compared to other accident categories. Human factors are deemed significant contributory causes in these accidents. This paper aims to identify the human factors involved with aviation accidents that resulted in CFIT. Method: The study used the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework to determine the factors involved in 50 CFIT accidents from 24 counties over a 10 year period, i.e. 2007–2017. Interviews with five senior aviation safety experts were used to provide a better comprehension of the human factors affecting the flight safety. Results: The study identified 1289 individual causal and contributory human factors with unsafe actions and preconditions for unsafe actions being the main subcategories of the accidents. The study found that CFIT occur across a range of pilot experience and 44% of accidents occurred in cruise flight. Distraction, complacency and fatigue are all elements that flight crews may experience as contributors to CFIT during cruising. Conclusions: Human factors represent a major component of CFIT accidents. The analysis revealed a similar pattern of contributory and causal human factors across the various flight categories, with some noteworthy isolated variations. The prevalent factors were decision and skill-based errors along with communication, coordination and planning issues. Practical applications: Provision of specific CFIT awareness, pilot training focusing on improved decision-making and revision of basic flight skills, development of specific Global Positioning System routes for transiting high terrain areas are necessary to prevent CFIT accidents. Installation of Terrain Avoidance and Warning System and Ground Proximity Warning System and appropriate equipment training, specific CFIT Crew Resource Management training and improvement of organizational knowledge on the elements involved in CFIT are also recommended.

Giving A Hand To Pilots With Animated Alarms Based On Mirror System Functioning

Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accidents are among the most frequent and deadly accidents in aviation (IATA, 2016). Pilots have sometimes only a few seconds to react to the ‘Pull-Up’ alarm that indicates an imminent collision with the ground. The auditory modality of the alarm can generate stress, which can disrupt cognitive processes (Porcelli et al., 2008) and negatively impact the ability to take timely and appropriate actions (Scholz et al., 2009). While in general humans are less sensitive to auditory stimuli than to visual stimuli (Mrugalska et al. 2016), the auditory component of the ‘Pull-Up’ alarm is loud and prominent whereas its visual component is more discreet (i.e., small text). Consequently, a first step to enhance the efficiency of this alarm would be to increase the conspicuity of its visual component by enlarging the ‘Pull-Up’ text size and to increase its salience by displacing it from the artificial horizon to the bottom of the Primary Flight Display (PFD). However, enlarging the inscription may not be sufficient to cope with the loss of cognitive performance due to stress (BEA, 2009). Previous researched found that watching an action activates premotor cortex and pre-initiates the gesture imitation through the mirror neuron system (Ocampo & Kritikos, 2011). Therefore, presenting a video of the gesture to perform (i.e., a hand pulling the sidestick), in case of imminent impact with the ground, should pre-activate the motor reaction to the alarm and then improve the pilots’ performance in terms of reaction time. The present experiment aimed at assessing whether these ‘Pull-Up’ video better performance than more conventional ‘Pull-Up’ alarms. Both behavioral and electroencephalographic (EEG) results were used to assess the best alarm design.

Safety assessment of RNP AR approach procedures

The required navigation performance authorisation required (RNP AR) approach, which is one of the performance-based navigation procedures, enables safer and efficient flight operations in busy and challenging mountainous areas. The RNP system increases situational awareness of pilots because of including monitoring and alerting service on board and ensuring lateral track accuracy of up to ± 0.1 NM. In this study, RNP AR approach (RNP AR APCH) procedures which will be a solution to prevent controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents are defined. CFIT accidents mostly occur in the approach and landing phase of flights because of the lack of precision approaches. Moreover, flight operational safety assessment (FOSA) methodology published for only RNP AR APCH procedures is assessed. The FOSA is a significant part of the operational authorisation for RNP AR APCH procedures and also is applied to evaluate particular cases and could be useful method for mitigating the risk of CFIT.

Pilot Domain Task Experience in Night Fatal Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Accidents.

In the United States, accident and fatality rates in helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) operations increase significantly under nighttime environmentally hazardous operational conditions. Other studies have found pilots' total flight hours unrelated to HEMS accident outcomes. Many factors affect pilots' decision making, including their experience. This study seeks to investigate whether pilot domain task experience (DTE) in HEMS plays a role against likelihood of accidents at night when hazardous operational conditions are entered. There were 32 flights with single pilot nighttime fatal HEMS accidents between 1995 and 2013 with findings of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) and loss of control (LCTRL) due to spatial disorientation (SD) identified. The HEMS DTE of the pilots were compared with industry survey data. Of the pilots, 56% had ≤2 yr of HEMS experience and 9% had >10 yr of HEMS experience. There were 21 (66%) accidents that occurred in non-visual flight rules (VFR) conditions despite all flights being required to be conducted under VFR. There was a statistically significant increase in accident rates in pilots with <2 and <4 yr HEMS DTE and a statistically significant decrease in accident rates in pilots with >10 yr HEMS DTE. HEMS DTE plays a preventive role against the likelihood of a night operational accident. Pilots with limited HEMS DTE are more likely to make a poor assessment of hazardous conditions at night, and this will place HEMS flight crew at high risk in the VFR night domain.

The Effects of Aircraft Certification Rules on General Aviation Accidents

The purpose of this study was to analyze the frequency of general aviation (GA) airplane accidents and accident rates on the basis of aircraft certification to determine whether or not differences in aircraft certification rules had an influence on accidents. In addition, the narrative cause descriptions contained within the accident reports were analyzed to determine whether there were differences in the qualitative data for the different certification categories. The certification categories examined were: Federal Aviation Regulations Part 23 (Part 23), Civil Air Regulations 3 (CAR 3), Light Sport Aircraft (LSA), and Experimental-Amateur Built (E-AB). The accident causes examined were those classified as: Loss of Control (LOC), Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT), Engine Failure, and Structural Failure. Airworthiness certification categories represent a wide diversity of government oversight. Part 23 rules have evolved from the initial set of simpler design standards and have progressed into a comprehensive and strict set of rules to address the safety issues of the more complex airplanes within the category. E-AB airplanes have the least amount of government oversight and are the fastest-growing segment. The LSA category is a more recent certification category that utilizes consensus standards in the approval process. CAR 3 airplanes were designed and manufactured under simpler rules, but modifying these airplanes has become lengthy and expensive. The study was conducted using a mixed-methods methodology. A Chi-Square test was used for a quantitative analysis of the accident frequency among aircraft certification categories. Accident rate analysis of the accidents among aircraft certification categories involved an This article is based on the Doctoral Dissertation of Carolina L. Anderson, submitted to the Department of Doctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. About the Author Carolina Anderson earned her PhD in aviation from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in December of 2013. The title of her dissertation was The Effects of Aircraft Certification Rules on General Aviation Accidents. Dr. Anderson holds an MBA from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (2002) and a BS in mechanical engineering from Los Andes University in Bogota, Colombia (1998). In addition, she holds the following professional certifications: Airline Transport Pilot Certificate; Certified Flight Instructor; Glider, Instrument and Multi-engine Ratings; Check Pilot and Training Center Evaluator (2004–2011) (Federal Aviation Administration). Dr. Anderson is an assistant professor of aeronautical science in the College of Aviation at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU; 2011 to present). Prior to joining the faculty at ERAU, she served as Training Manager for the Flight Department at ERAU, Standards Check-Pilot and Flight Instructor (2000–2011). Over the last five years, Dr. Anderson has been involved in numerous research projects, including the flight testing of biofuels for general aviation, the development and instruction of an Upset Recovery Training Course for FAA inspectors, the development and acquisition of flight test data for Level 6 Flight Training Devices (FTDs), as well as various projects for the FAA Center of Excellence for General Aviation Research (CGAR). Dr. Anderson participated in the Part 23 Aviation Rulemaking Committee and she is currently the vice chairman of the Industry Liaison Sub-Committee of the ASTM General Aviation Chapter (F44). Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to lenzc@erau.edu. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering 4:2 (2015) 32–48 http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/2159-6670.1104 analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test. The qualitative component involved the use of text mining techniques for the analysis of the narrative cause descriptions contained within the accident reports. The Chi-Square test indicated that there was no significant difference in the number of accidents among the different certification categories when either CFIT or Structural Failure was listed as cause. However, there was a significant difference in the frequency of accidents with regard to LOC and Engine Failure accidents. The results of the ANCOVA test indicated that there was no significant difference in the accident rate with regard to LOC, CFIT, or Structural Failure accidents. There was, however, a significant difference in Engine Failure accidents between E-AB and the other categories. The text mining analysis of the narrative causes of LOC accidents indicated that only the CAR 3 category airplanes had clusters of words associated with visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions. CAR 3 airplanes were designed and manufactured prior to the 1960s, and in most cases have not been retrofitted to take advantage of newer technologies that could help prevent LOC accidents. The study indicated that GA aircraft certification rules do not have a statistically significant effect on aircraft accidents except for LOC and Engine Failure. According to the literature, government oversight could have become an obstacle in the implementation of safetyenhancing equipment that could reduce LOC accidents. Oversight should focus on ensuring that E-AB aircraft owners perform a functional test that could prevent some of the Engine Failure accidents.

DID TECHNOLOGY IMPROVE SAFETY? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN ACCIDENTS

Aviation safety has been affected greatly by technological improvements. A series of Ground Proximity Warning Systems (GPWSs) were developed to prevent accidents during Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT). This study analyzed the role of GPWS (or Enhanced GPWS, EGPWS) in flight safety history to determine how effective GPWS/EGPWS was in terms of preventing CFIT. The result showed a substantial increase in CFIT accidents due to the rapid growth of aviation development. This situation improved after the mandatory installation of GPWSs in commercial aircraft. However, the legal requirement did not apply to all general aviation. Most CFIT accidents have involved general aviation aircraft that do not have GPWS/EGPWS installed on board. Thus, the mandatory requirement should apply to all civil aircraft. CFIT accidents have also been reduced considerably in developed countries whereas they remain a major issue in developing countries.

복행실패로 발생한 CFIT사고의 공통요인 및 외항사 복행게이트 운영 실태에 대한 연구 (한국 대표적 CFIT사고의 TEM 분석을 중심으로)

There have been CFIT(Controlled Flight Into Terrain) accidents that can be prevented if the crew executed go-around. This study is to analyse the common factors of three typical CFIT accidents of Korea in TEM(threat and error management) frame, and the examples of go-around gate and the countermeasures of eight airlines through the survey facilitating go-around to prevent CFIT. The common factors found in three typical CFIT accidents occurred in Korea or by Korean carriers turned out to be in mountainous terrain, in bad weather while in non-precision approach or circling approach by captain as PF(Pilot Flying) when crew make monitoring errors and communication errors. It also turned out that the crew in all three typical tragic CFIT accidents did not execute go-around in unstabilized approaches. The captains did not respond immediately when first officers advised them to go-around until it is too late. Seven out of eight Airlines answered that they use stabilized approach height as 1,000 feet to be stabilized earlier to have more safety margin by enhancing go-around gate regardless of the weather to prevent CFIT in the survey.

2000년대 국내 항공기 사고·준사고 발생유형 사례연구

Since year 2001 to the present time, the aircraft accidents and serious incidents in our country have surpassed 150 occurrences. The Boeing has published the statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents annually for the past 10 years on the basis of the occurrence categories defined by the CICTT(CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team), and the number of occurrences is in order of loss of control(LOC-I), controlled flight into terrain(CFIT) and runway excursion (RE). Like the NTSB and the EASA, when fatal and non-fatal accidents are aggregated, though fatality rate is low, abnormal runway contact(ARC), system/component failure(SCF-PP/NP), ground handling(RAMP) rank high in the CICTT occurrence categories. With the less occurrence frequency, it is difficult to statistically analyze the aircraft accidents in our country, thus customarily the accidents and the serious incidents on aggregate are consolidated, and the statistical analysis is performed. This study categorizes the accidents and serious incidents to the domestic transportation aircraft in the past 10 years according to the CICTT occurrence categories, that is compared with foreign practices, and the implications have been discussed. From years 2001 through 2010, the accidents to the domestic transportation aircraft occurred in order of system failure(SCF-NP), ARC and power plant failure(SCF-PP), and when the accidents and the serious incidents are consolidated and analyzed, it is verified that a distribution appears similar to the European accident occurrence categories defined from 300 accident occurrence data.

항공기 충돌 회피 경고 알고리듬 연구

항공기 사고 중에서 주요 원인 중 하나인 조종상태 지상충돌(Controlled Flight Into Terrain, CFIT)을 해결하기 위하여 대지 접근 경고 장치(Ground Proximity Warning System, GPWS)를 사용하여 항공기 아랫부분의 지형에 대해서 지형충돌 경고를 출력한다. 이러한 대지 접근 경고 장치도 적시에 경고가 발생하지 않아 많은 문제가 있었다. 본 논문에서는 비행 상태와 지형정보를 이용하여 속도가 빠르고, 고기동을 하는 전투기에 대해서 보다 효율적인 지형/장애물 충돌 회피 경고 알고리듬을 개발하였다. 이 알고리듬에는 조종사의 반응시간을 포함하여 항공기의 지연시간을 고려하였고, 일련의 검증을 통해 실제 탑재 가능한 알고리듬을 제시하였다. CFIT(Controlled Flight Into Terrain) is one of the major causes of aircraft accidents. In order to solve this problem, GPWS(Ground Proximity Warning System) is used to generate terrain collision warning using the distance between the aircraft and the underneath ground. Since the GPWS uses the vertical clearance only, it frequently generates false warnings. In this study, a terrain/obstacle collision avoidance warning algorithm was developed for fast flying and highly maneuvering fighters using the flight status and the geographic information. This algorithm condsiders the overall delay in the aircraft reactive motion including the pilot's reaction time. The paper presents a detailed logic and test methods.

A multifaceted public health approach to statewide aviation safety

During the 1990s, Alaskan pilots had one of the most hazardous occupations in the US. In 2000, a multifaceted public health initiative was launched, focusing on Alaskan air taxi/commuter (AT) operations, including risk factor identification, improved weather information, and the formation of an industry-led safety organization. Effectiveness was assessed by comparing rates of crashes using Poisson regression, comparing trends in annual numbers of crashes, and assessing changes in the number and type of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) events. The greatest improvements were seen in Alaska fatal AT crashes with a 57% decrease in rates between time periods. While the number of AT crashes in the rest of the US steadily declined during 1990-2009, Alaska only showed significant declines after 2000. CFIT crashes declined but remained more deadly than other crashes. This coordinated effort was successful in reducing crashes in the Alaskan AT industry.

Controlled Flight Into Terrain에 의한 항공기 사고예방 대책에 관한 연구

이 논문의 목적은 항공기 상태가 정상상태에서 공항에 접근 착륙 중 발생한 사고로서 상업용 항공사에서 발생하는 사고를 예방하기위한 지침이 될 수 있는 사고예방 차원에서 중요한 이정표가 될 수 있다. 이 논문의 CFIT 사고의 주요한 분석은 1993년도부터 2002년까지 발생한 사고 중에서 괌사고, 목포사고 및 김해사고를 중점으로 사고원인분석을 실시하였다.CFIT 사고는 운항승무원에 의해서 사고 전에 충분히 인지하지 못하고 있다가 지상 장애물 또는 해면에 충돌하는 사고로 매우 치명적이다. 일반적으로 CFIT 사고는 대부분의 비행 중에 발생할 수 있지만, 보다 많이 발생하는 경우는 착륙중에 발생함으로 더욱 위험하다고 볼 수 있다.이 논문을 통하여 CFIT 사고를 예방하기위하여 운항승무원 교육 및 훈련을 할 필요가 있다고 사료되며 특별히 EGPWS(향상된 지상충돌경고장비)와 같은 장비를 항공기에 장착하기를 추천하며 항공사의 조직문화에 대한 연구가 더욱 요구된다고 판단한다. The purpose of this study was is leading landmark efforts to prevent the major causes of commercial-aviation fatalities about controlled flight into terrain(CFIT) in approach-and-landing accidents. The paper of major analysis for controlled flight into terrain(CFIT) was Guam accident, Mokpo accident and Gimhae accident in commercial transport-aircraft accidents from 1993 through 2002.CFIT occurs when an airworthy aircraft under the control of the flight crew is flown unintentionally into terrain, obstacles or water, usually with no prior awareness by the crew. This type of accident can occur during most phases of flight, but CFIT is more common during the approach-and-landing phase.The paper believed that prevention for CFIT accident was education and training for flying crew and upgrade for equipment such as EGPWS, and need more research for professional organizations of airlines.