Abstract Ionizing radiation is largely used in medicine due to its role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. In the past 50 years computed tomography (CT) has become indispensable for medical practice because it offers sub-millimeter cross-sectional imaging of any region of the body. New CT scanners use thinner slices, providing more accurate results, but also an increased radiation exposure with possible long-term harmful effects for the patients. The parameter used as an indicator of radiation dose in CT is the dose-length product (DLP). The study included 4507 patients who were CT scanned using a 16, 32, 64 or 128-slice CT machine. DLP was measured for head, sinuses, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, abdomen+pelvis, and trunk scans - regions for which the health authorities have established national diagnostic reference levels (DRL - the expected radiation dose received by a patient in CT). One-way ANOVA was used to analyse data considering the use of contrast agents, the gender, age, and weight of patients. Average DLP values were higher (up to 80%) than national DRL for all regions in 64 and 128-slice scans. The highest DLP values were registered in contrast CT for all scanners (p < 0.01); the maximum average (a threefold increase compared to DRL) was measured in the 32-slice sinuses contrast CT. Average DLP correlated with patients’ gender and weight (p < 0.01), but the influence was lower compared to the use of contrast agents. In conclusion, CT scans acquired using thinner slices lead to more accurate results and high-quality images, but the study suggests an increased radiation exposure. CT has an uncontestable contribution to a precise and rapid diagnosis, but more attention must be given to the stochastic effects risks associated with the radiation dose received during a CT scan. Are all scans necessary? Do all patients really need to receive high doses? The role of the practitioner is decisive, and the justifiable process is “a must” in all radiodiagnosis practices. Key messages • CT doses must be kept “as low as reasonably achievable” while maintaining diagnostic image quality. • Justification, dose limitation, and optimisation are fundamental principles of radioprotection.