Contrast-enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography Research Articles

Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can overcome the limitations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided acquisition by identifying microvessels inside inhomogeneous tumours and improving the characterization of these tumours. Despite the initial enthusiasm that oriented needle sampling under CH-EUS guidance could provide better diagnostic yield in pancreatic solid lesions, further studies did not confirm the supplementary values in cases of tissue acquisition guided by CH-EUS. This review details the knowledge based on the available data on contrast-guided procedures. The indications for CH-EUS tissue acquisition include isoechoic EUS lesions with poor visible delineation where CH-EUS can differentiate the lesion vascularisation from the surrounding parenchyma and also the mural nodules within biliopancreatic cystic lesions, which occur in select cases. Additionally, the roles of CH-EUS-guided therapy in patients whose pancreatic fluid collections or bile ducts that have an echogenic content have indications for drainage, and patients who have nonvisualized vessels that need to be highlighted via Doppler EUS are presented. Another indication is represented if there is a need for an immediate assessment of the post-radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, in which case CH-EUS can be used to reveal the incomplete tumour destruction.

Comments and illustrations of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidelines. Rare pancreatic tumors, imaging features on transabdominal ultrasound and EUS with contrast enhancement: Rare epithelial pancreatic tumors: solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, acinar cell carcinoma, mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, some rare subtypes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatoblastoma

ABSTRACT Rare malignant pancreatic lesions are systematically reported in this review. The focus is on the imaging appearance of the rare epithelial pancreatic tumors such as the solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, acinar cell carcinoma, rare subtypes of adenocarcinoma, and pancreatoblastoma as seen on ultrasound, EUS, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound or EUS. The present overview summarizes the data and shows that not every pancreatic tumor is likely to be the most common entities of ductal adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound likely does not improve diagnostic adequacy during endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue acquisition: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsSolid pancreatic masses are sampled through tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Inadequate samples may significantly delay diagnosis, increasing costs and carrying risks to the patients. Aim: assess the diagnostic adequacy of tissue acquisition using contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) compared to conventional EUS. MethodsFive databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched in November 2023. Studies comparing diagnostic adequacy, accuracy and safety using CEH-EUS versus conventional EUS for tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RoB2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized studies, level of evidence using the GRADE approach, Odds Ratios (RR) with 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI) calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. I2 quantified heterogeneity. ResultsThe search identified 3858 records; nine studies (1160 patients) were included. OR for achieving an adequate sample was 1.467 (CI: 0.850–2.533), for randomized trials 0.902 (CI: 0.541–1.505), for non-randomized 2.396 (CI: 0.916–6.264), with significant subgroup difference. OR for diagnostic accuracy was 1.326 (CI: 0.890–1977), for randomized trials 0.997 (CI: 0.593–1.977) and for non-randomized studies 1.928 (CI: 1.096–3.393), significant subgroup difference (p = 0.0467). No differences were observed for technical failures or adverse events. Heterogeneity was low, risk of bias “low” to “some concerns” for most outcomes, mostly moderate for non-randomized studies. ConclusionNon-randomized studies indicated differences in favor of contrast-enhanced EUS, randomized studies showed no difference in diagnostic adequacy, accuracy or sensitivity when using CEH-EUS.

Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Gallbladder Disease Diagnosis.

Gallbladder (GB) disease is classified into two broad categories: GB wall-thickening and protuberant lesions, which include various lesions, such as adenomyomatosis, cholecystitis, GB polyps, and GB carcinoma. This review summarizes recent advances in the differential diagnosis of GB lesions, focusing primarily on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and related technologies. Fundamental B-mode EUS and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) have been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of GB diseases because they can evaluate the thickening of the GB wall and protuberant lesions in detail. We also outline the current status of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for GB lesions, as there have been scattered reports on EUS-FNA in recent years. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, ranging from machine learning to deep learning, have become popular in healthcare for disease diagnosis, drug discovery, drug development, and patient risk identification. In this review, we outline the current status of AI in the diagnosis of GB.

Role of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS elastography in pancreatic lesions.

Pancreatic cancers have a poor prognosis, and their incident rates have risen. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an efficient and reliable diagnostic modality for pancreatic lesions, providing high spatial resolution. However, while EUS helps to detect minor pancreatic lesions, nearly all solid pancreatic lesions are hypoechoic, which creates difficulty in making differential diagnoses of pancreatic lesions. When diagnosing pancreatic lesions, the performance of image-enhanced EUS techniques is essential, such as EUS elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS). CH-EUS diagnosis is based on assessing the vascularity of lesions, whereas tissue elasticity is measured via EUS elastography. Elastography is either strain or shear-wave, depending on the different mechanical properties being evaluated. The usefulness of enhanced EUS techniques is demonstrated in this review for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, including solid and cystic lesions, and pancreatic cancer staging.

Epidermoid cyst in an intrapancreatic accessory spleen diagnosed by contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS-FNA (with video)

Epidermoid cyst in an intrapancreatic accessory spleen diagnosed by contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS-FNA (with video)

Contemporary diagnosis and management of gallbladder polyps

Gallbladder (GB) polyps are present in 5%–10% of the general population and consist of true neoplastic polyps (adenomas) and pseudopolyps (predominantly cholesterol, inflammatory, hyperplastic, focal adenomyomatosis). True polyps, although relatively rare neoplastic lesions (0.5%) are considered an important factor in malignant transformation and cancer development (5%) when their size is ≥ 1 cm. Given that it is essential to diagnose GB adenocarcinoma at an early stage to optimize therapeutic management, controversy exists about whether cholecystectomy is always necessary. Their imaging characteristics, size ≥ 1 cm, age > 50 years and genetic predisposition determine the indications for immediate cholecystectomy. In younger patients with polyps < 1 cm in size and without a familial history of GB carcinoma, imaging follow-up by ultrasound (US) seems to be a reasonable recommended policy. A scoring system by multivariate analysis (cross-sectional area > 123 mm2, positive blood flow signal, age > 55.5 years, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 50 U/L and an ALT/AST (aspartate aminotransferase) ratio > 0.77) can accurately predict true polyps. The widely accepted size threshold for US follow-up is 7 mm, and for intervention, it is 10 mm. Computed tomography or better magnetic resonance imaging can overcome any misdiagnosis of conventional US incidental findings alone that may lead to potentially unnecessary operations. In challenging cases, high-resolution US, novel three-dimensional US, endoscopic US or contrast-enhanced endoscopic US could be helpful. Novel microflow imaging can safely predict polyps. Risk factors for malignancy include age > 60 years, large gallstones, primary sclerosing cholangitis, Asian ethnicity and sessile polyps accompanied by focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm. For polyps sized 6–9 mm, the absence of growth at recommended follow-up (6 months, one year, and two years) indicates treatment discontinuation; however, it is not required for size < 5 mm without risk factors. In addition to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the standard management, novel interventional modalities preserving the GB in selected cases include per-oral transmural endoscopic resection of GB polyps after a bridge of endoscopic US-guided cholecystostomy or laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving polypectomy. Generally, there are still no precise and strong evidence-based guidelines; thus, the management policy of GB polyps should be individualized in ambiguous cases.

Endoscopic evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: Cholangioscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, or both?

Accurate and timely diagnosis of biliary strictures can be challenging. Because the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue sampling for malignancy are suboptimal, additional endoscopic evaluation by cholangioscopy and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is often necessary to differentiate between malignant and benign biliary strictures to guide clinical management. While direct visualization by cholangioscopy and/or high-resolution imaging by EUS are often the first step in the evaluation of an indeterminate biliary stricture (IDBS), tissue diagnosis by cholangioscopy-guided biopsy and/or EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition is the preferred modality to establish a diagnosis of malignancy. Because each modality has its own strengths and limitations, selection of cholangioscopy and EUS is best guided by thebiliary stricture location and local expertise. Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis, biopsy forceps with improved design, contrast-enhanced EUS, and dedicated fine-needle biopsy devices are recent technological advances that may further improve the diagnostic performance of cholangioscopy and EUS in patients with IDBS.

Use of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) provides high spatial and contrast resolution and is a useful tool for evaluating the pancreato-biliary regions. Recently, contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) has been used to evaluate lesion vascularity, especially for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. CH-EUS adds two major advantages when diagnosing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL). First, it can differentiate between mural nodules and mucous clots, thereby improving the accurate classification of PCL. Second, it helps with evaluation of the malignant potential of PCL, especially of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms by revealing the vascularity in the mural nodules and solid components. This review discusses the use and limitations of CH-EUS for the diagnosis of PCL.

A review of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic solid tumors.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is superior to other imaging modalities in the detection of pancreatic masses, although differentiating the types of pancreatic masses detected on EUS remains challenging. However, the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) using ultrasound contrast agents for this differentiation has been reported. CH-EUS plays a pivotal role in analysis of small lesions that can only be detected with EUS. Recently, CH-EUS was used for staging and/or determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer in several clinical trials. In addition, it is used to estimate the response of pancreatic cancer to chemotherapy and to determine the prognosis in cases of pancreatic cancer and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. It is also postulated that CH-EUS improves the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) through complementary diagnoses using CH-EUS and EUS-FNAB, or CH-EUS-guided EUS-FNAB. Thus, CH-EUS has been employed for various qualitative diagnoses, including differentiation of pancreatic masses. Second-generation contrast agents such as Sonazoid are used clinically for ultrasound diagnostic imaging of liver and breast disease. The positioning of CH-EUS with Sonazoid as a test for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors is an issue for further studies.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for swollen lymph nodes.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an important tool for the evaluation of lymphadenopathy, especially in intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal regions. EUS also provides tissue diagnosis via EUS fine-needle aspiration or biopsy. To select the target for biopsy or aspiration, conventional B-mode images are used for the evaluation, but this approach still lacks diagnostic accuracy. Contrast-enhanced EUS has been used to evaluate the vascularity of lesions. Most malignant lymphadenopathy shows heterogenous enhancement or defect of enhancement, while quantitative studies using time-intensity curves in contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS show a rapid decline in enhancement pattern. These findings are useful as an auxiliary method for tissue diagnosis or in cases in which tissue diagnosis is contraindicated.

Ultrasonographic Features of Nonneoplastic Protrusions in Pancreatic Cysts by Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound.

Most of the pancreatic cyst protrusions detected by B-mode endoscopic ultrasound (BM-EUS) are nonneoplastic and are not enhanced by contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) using ultrasound contrast agent (USCA). This study aimed to identify useful findings for distinguishing between neoplastic and nonneoplastic pancreatic cyst protrusions on BM-EUS to facilitate efficient USCA use. A total of 151 pancreatic cyst protrusions in 119 consecutive patients who underwent CE-EUS were analyzed. We focused on the echo level (hyperechoic/isoechoic/hypoechoic/anechoic), base type (sessile without a basal waist/sessile with a basal waist/pedunculated), surface type (smooth/irregular), and the presence/absence of a hyperechoic surface layer. Enhanced and unenhanced protrusions on CE-EUS were interpreted as neoplastic and nonneoplastic, respectively. Forty-five and 106 protrusions were enhanced and unenhanced, respectively, on CE-EUS performed using USCA. In univariable analysis of predictors of nonneoplastic protrusion on BM-EUS, the following factors were found to be significant: echo level (hypoechoic/anechoic), base type (sessile with a basal waist/pedunculated), a smooth surface, and a hyperechoic surface layer. Of these, only a hyperechoic surface layer remained significant in the multivariable analysis ( P < 0.0001; odds ratio, 40.74; 95% confidence interval, 7.07-387.49). Pancreatic cyst protrusions with a hyperechoic surface layer on BM-EUS are suggestive of nonneoplastic disease.

Novel Technique of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Lesions and Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Detective flow imaging endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI-EUS) is an innovative imaging modality that was developed to detect fine vessels and low-velocity blood flow without contrast agents. We evaluate its utility for the differential diagnosis of gallbladder lesions and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). We enrolled patients who underwent DFI-EUS, e-FLOW EUS, and contrast-enhanced EUS for gallbladder lesions or IPMNs. The detection of vessels using DFI-EUS and e-FLOW EUS was compared with that via contrast-enhanced EUS and pathological findings. The vessel pattern was also categorized as regular or irregular. Of the 33 lesions included, there were final diagnoses of 13 IPMNs and 20 gallbladder lesions. DFI-EUS was significantly superior to e-FLOW EUS for discriminating between mural nodules and mucous clots and between solid gallbladder lesions and sludge using the presence or absence of vessel detection in lesions (p = 0.005). An irregular vessel pattern with DFI-EUS was a significant predictor of malignant gallbladder lesions (p = 0.002). DFI-EUS is more sensitive than e-FLOW-EUS for vessel detection and the differential diagnosis of gallbladder lesions and IPMNs. Vessel evaluation using DFI-EUS may be a useful and simple method for differentiating between mural nodules and mucous clots in IPMN, between solid gallbladder lesions and sludge, and between malignant and benign gallbladder lesions.

Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has increased over the last several decades. In general, NETs are slow-growing neoplasms and the data on the natural history is still evolving. The availability and improved utilization of advanced imaging modalities have allowed the selection of cases suitable for endotherapy. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a central imaging modality to assess the depth of infiltration in gastroduodenal as well as rectal NETs. Enhanced EUS modalities, including contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography, reliably differentiate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from adenocarcinomas and may enable prediction of aggressive PNETs. With recent developments in therapeutic endoscopy, a large proportion of GEP-NETs can be safely managed endoscopically. Endoscopic resection techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), allow the safe removal of gastroduodenal and rectal NETs. Recent data indicate that modified EMR techniques may be superior to conventional EMR with regard to histologically complete resection. Device-assisted endoscopic full thickness resection is emerging as a safe and effective technique for upper gastrointestinal as well as rectal NETs. In selected cases with PNETs, who are otherwise unfit for surgery, EUS-guided ablation is increasingly being recognized as a safe treatment option. This review focusses on evidence-based approaches to endoscopic evaluation and the management of GEP-NETs with special emphasis on recent advancements.

Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Differentiation of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) is a promising diagnostic modality for differentiating malignant and benign lymph nodes. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic capability of CE-EUS in differentiating indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) from aggressive NHL. Patients who underwent CE-EUS and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for lymphadenopathy and were diagnosed with NHL were included in this study. Echo features on B-mode endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and vascular and enhancement patterns on CE-EUS were qualitatively evaluated. The enhancement intensity of the lymphadenopathy on CE-EUS over 60 s was also quantitatively evaluated using time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis. A total of 62 patients who were diagnosed with NHL were enrolled in this study. Regarding qualitative evaluation using B-mode EUS, there were no significant differences in the echo features between aggressive NHL and indolent NHL. With regard to qualitative evaluation using CE-EUS, aggressive NHL showed a heterogeneous enhancement pattern that is significantly more frequent than indolent NHL (95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 0.79, p = 0.0089). When heterogeneous enhancement was defined as aggressive NHL, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the qualitative evaluation when using CE-EUS were 61%, 72%, and 66%, respectively. In TIC analysis, the velocity of reduction for homogeneous lesions was significantly higher in aggressive NHL than in indolent NHL (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE-EUS in differentiating indolent NHL from aggressive NHL improved to 94%, 69%, and 82%, respectively, when combined with qualitative and quantitative evaluations. CE-EUS before EUS-FNA for mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy may be useful for improving the diagnostic capability of differentiating between indolent NHL and aggressive NHL (clinical trial registration number: UMIN000047907).

Identification of sentinel lymph nodes in esophageal cancer patients using contrast-enhanced EUS with peritumoral injections.

The objective of this pilot study was to compare the performance of contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with EUS-FNA for lymph node (LN) staging in esophageal cancer. Thirty-seven subjects with esophageal cancer undergoing EUS staging were enrolled, and 30 completed this institutional review board-approved study. A Prosound F75 US system (Hitachi Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with harmonic contrast imaging software and GF-UCT180 curvilinear endoscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized. All LNs identified by standard EUS were first noted. Sonazoid (dose: 1 mL; GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) was administered peritumorally, and all enhanced LNs were recorded. Fine-needle aspiration was performed on LNs considered suspicious by EUS alone, as well as LNs enhanced on CE-EUS. Performance of each modality was compared using FNA cytology as reference standard. A total of 132 LNs were detected with EUS, of which 59 showed enhancement on CE-EUS. Fifty-three LNs underwent FNA, and 22 LNs were determined to be malignant. Among the latter, 10 were considered suspicious by EUS, whereas the other 12 LNs underwent FNA only because of CE-EUS enhancement. Contrast-enhanced EUS showed enhancement in 19 of the 22 malignant LNs. The rate of metastatic node identification from EUS was 45% (10/22), and it was 86% (19/22; P = 0.008) for CE-EUS. Eight subjects (8/30 [27% of study total]) had nodal status upgraded by the addition of CE-EUS, which influenced LN staging and clinical management. Fine-needle aspiration of LNs identified by CE-EUS may increase metastasis positive rate by ruling out LNs not associated with the tumor drainage pattern. In addition, CE-EUS seems to identify more metastatic LNs that would not be biopsied under the standard EUS criteria.

The sun beside the pancreatic neck: The lymph node gastrinoma (with video).

The sun beside the pancreatic neck: The lymph node gastrinoma (with video).

Unusual complication of central venous catheter detected on contrast-enhanced EUS (with video).

Unusual complication of central venous catheter detected on contrast-enhanced EUS (with video).

Assessment of biological effect of nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine, using contrast enhanced ultrasonography and elastography, in advanced pancreatic ductal carcinoma: A single-center pilot study.

EUS associated with contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) and EUS elastography (EUS-E) are used in clinical practice to assess pancreatic tumor at the diagnosis. In case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with liver metastasis, nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine is a first-line treatment option. We aimed to assess the modification of PDAC microenvironment induced by the combination of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine, by endoscopic ultrasonography techinics. This single center phase III study conducted between February 2015 and June 2016 included patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mesurable liver metastasis and no prior cancer treatment fit for two cycles of nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine. We aimed to perform EUS with CH-EUS and EUS-E of the pancreatic tumor, CT scan and contrast enhanced ultrasonogram (CE-US) of a reference liver metastasis, before and after the two cylces of chemotherapy. Primary end point was modification of vascularizaion of primary tumor and a reference liver metastasis. Secondary end points were modification of stromal content, safety profile of drug combination and tumor response rate. Sixteen patients were analyzed, but only 13 received two cycled of chemotherapy (CT) (toxicity [n = 1] or death [n = 2]). There was no statistical modification induced by CT concering vascularity of primary tumor (time to maximum intensity P = 0.24, value of maximum intensity P = 0.71, hypoechogenic aspect generated by injection of contrast enhancing agent), vascularity of a reference liver metastasis (time to maximum intensity P = 0.99, value of maximum intensity P = 0.71) and tumor elasticity (P = 0.22). Eleven patients had tumor response assessement, 6/11 (54%) had measurable disease response 4/11 (36%) with partial responses and 2/11 (18%) with stable disease. All other patients showed disease progression. No serious side effects occurred, 6/11 patients had a dose adjustment. We did not show significant modification of vascularity and elasticity but these results should be taken with caution because of important limitations.

EUS-guided through-the-needle microforceps biopsy for diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis mimicking pancreatic cystic lesion (with video).

A 40-year-old male presented with upper abdominal discomfort and ultrasound abdomen revealed a cystic lesion in the uncinate process. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a thick-walled cystic lesion measuring 4.2 cm in the uncinate process [Figure 1]. Positron emission computed tomography revealed flouro-deoxyglucose avidity in the wall of this cystic lesion [Figure 2]. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy from the cystic lesion done elsewhere was inconclusive on two separate occasions. EUS done at our center revealed a complex cystic lesion posterior to the head of the pancreas and closely abutting the inferior vena cava with normal uncinate process [Figure 3; arrows]. Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS using Sonovue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) at low mechanical index of 0.12 revealed nonhomogenous enhancement of the cystic lesion with solid areas showing enhancement [arrows; Figure 4] and anechoic areas not enhancing. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy form the solid as well as liquid areas was inconclusive and revealed necrosis only. Thereafter, tissue sampling was done from the solid area of the lesion under EUS guidance using through the needle forceps device (Moray Micro Forceps, US Endoscopy, United States) [Figure 5 and Video 1]. To improve the visualization of opening of forceps in the lesion, biopsy was performed using both B mode and harmonic EUS [Video 1]. The use of harmonic EUS led on to better visualization of the tip of Microforceps. Two passes were taken and crush smear was prepared with one specimen and the other specimen was sent in formalin vial. The cytopathological examination revealed lymphoid tissue with the presence of loose collection of epitheloid cells and necrosis [Figure 6]. No acid fast bacilli could be detected. The rapid nucleic acid amplification test (Xpert MTB/RIF; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) performed on the aspirated specimen was negative. The Mantoux test was positive (induration of 16 mm), C-reactive protein was elevated (16 mg/L), and the patient was started on anti-tubercular therapy (ATT). The patient responded to ATT and the abdominal discomfort subsided after 1 month of initiating ATT. Serum CRP normalized at 2 months and ultrasound of the abdomen done three months after initiation of ATT revealed reduction in size of the lesion (2.3 cm).Figure 1: Contrast enhanced computed tomography: thick walled cystic lesion in the uncinate process of pancreasFigure 2: Positron emission computed tomography: flouro-deoxyglucose avidity in the wall of cystic lesionFigure 3: EUS: Complex cystic lesion (arrows) posterior to the head of pancreas and closely abutting the inferior vena cava with normal uncinate processFigure 4: Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS: Nonhomogenous enhancement of the cystic lesion with solid areas showing enhancement (arrows) and anechoic areas not enhancingFigure 5: EUS-guided biopsy using through the needle forceps deviceFigure 6: Microphotograph of microbiopsy specimen: a loose collection of epithelioid cells (arrows) with necrosis in the background (H and E, ×40)To improve the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided tissue sampling, through-the-needle micro-forceps device has been introduced and studies have reported high diagnostic yield in pancreatic cystic lesions.[1,2] It can also be used for tissue diagnosis in difficult to diagnose lesions as in the index case. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest Surinder Singh Rana is an Editorial Board Member of the journal. This article was subject to the journal’s standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of this editor and his research group.