Contralateral Hip Osteoarthritis Research Articles

Do 3-dimensional Spinopelvic Characteristics Normalize After THA? A Prospective, Comparative Study Using Motion Capture Analysis.

Spinopelvic stiffness (primarily in the sagittal plane) has been identified as a factor associated with inferior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and increased dislocation risk after THA. Incorporating preoperative spinopelvic characteristics into surgical planning has been suggested to determine a patient-specific cup orientation that minimizes dislocation risk. Sagittal plane radiographic analysis of static postures indicates that patients exhibit a degree of normalization in their spinopelvic characteristics after THA. It is not yet known whether normalization is also evident during dynamic movement patterns, nor whether it occurs in the coronal and axial planes as well. (1) Does motion capture analysis of sagittal spinopelvic motion provide evidence of normalization after THA? (2) Do changes in coronal and axial plane motion accompany those in the sagittal plane? Between April 2019 and February 2020, 25 patients agreed to undergo motion capture movement analysis before THA for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Of those, 20 underwent the same assessment between 8 and 31 months after THA. Five patients were excluded because of revision surgery (n = 1), contralateral hip OA (n = 1), and technical issues with a force plate during post-THA assessment (n = 3), leaving a cohort total of 15 (median age [IQR] 65 years [10]; seven male and eight female patients). A convenience sample of nine asymptomatic volunteers, who were free of hip and spinal pathology, was also assessed (median age 51 years [34]; four male and five female patients). Although the patients in the control group were younger than those in the patient group, this set a high bar for our threshold of spinopelvic normalization, reducing the possibility of false positive results. Three-dimensional motion capture was performed to measure spinal, pelvic, and hip motion while participants completed three tasks: seated bend and reach, seated trunk rotation, and gait on a level surface. ROM during each task was assessed and compared between pre- and post-THA conditions and between patients and controls. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to assess the timing of differences in motion during gait, and spatiotemporal gait parameters were also measured. After THA, patients demonstrated improvements in sagittal spinal (median [IQR] 32° [18°] versus 41° [14°]; difference of medians 9°; p = 0.004), pelvis (25° [21°] versus 30° [8°]; difference of medians 5°; p = 0.02), and hip ROM (21° [18°] versus 27° [10°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.02) during seated bend and reach as well in sagittal hip ROM during gait (30° [11°] versus 44° [7°]; difference of medians 14°; p < 0.001) compared with their pre-THA results, and they showed a high degree of normalization overall. These sagittal plane changes were accompanied by post-THA increases in coronal hip ROM (12° [9°] versus 18° [8°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.01) during seated trunk rotation, by both coronal (6° [4°] versus 9° [3°]; difference of medians 3°; p = 0.01) and axial (10° [8°] versus 16° [7°]; difference of medians 6°; p = 0.003) spinal ROM, as well as coronal (8° [3°] versus 13° [4°]; difference of medians 5°; p < 0.001) and axial hip ROM (21° [11°] versus 34° [24°]; difference of medians 13°; p = 0.01) during gait compared with before THA. The SPM analysis showed these improvements occurred during the late swing and early stance phases of gait. When restricted preoperatively, spinopelvic characteristics during daily tasks show normalization after THA, concurring with previous radiographic findings in the sagittal plane. Thus, spinopelvic characteristics change dynamically, and incorporating them into surgical planning would require predictive models on post-THA improvements to be of use. Level II, prognostic study.

Total hip arthroplasty after lower extremity amputation.

There are approximately 1.6 million lower extremity amputees in the United States. Lower extremity amputees are subject to increased physical demands proportional to their level of amputation. Lower extremity amputees have a 6-fold higher risk of developing radiographic osteoarthritis in the ipsilateral hip and a 2-fold risk of developing radiographic osteoarthritis in contralateral hip when compared with the non-amputee population. Additionally, there is a 3-fold increased risk of developing radiographic osteoarthritis in the ipsilateral hip after an above knee amputation when compared with a below knee amputation. The authors retrospectively reviewed 35 total hip arthroplasties after lower extremity amputation. The mean clinical follow-up was 5.3±4.0 years. The mean time from lower extremity amputation to total hip arthroplasty was 12.2±12.8 years after a contralateral amputation and 5.4±6.0 years after an ipsilateral amputation (P=.050). The mean time to total hip arthroplasty was 15.6±15.4 years after an above knee amputation and 6.4±6.1 years after a below knee amputation (P=.021). There was a statistically significant improvement in the mean Harris Hip Score from 35.9±21.8 to 76.8±12.8 with total hip arthroplasty after a contralateral amputation (P<.001). There also was a statistically significant improvement in the mean Harris Hip Score from 25.4±21.7 to 78.6±17.1 with total hip arthroplasty after an ispilateral amputation (P<.001). Three (17.7%) total hip arthroplasties after a contralateral amputation and 2 (11.1%) total hip arthroplasties after an ipsilateral amputation required revision total hip arthroplasty. Patients with an ipsilateral amputation or a below knee amputation progress to total hip arthroplasty faster than those with a contralateral amputation or an above knee amputation, respectively. Lower extremity amputees experience clinically significant improvements with total hip arthroplasty after lower extremity amputation.

What Predicts 36-Item Health Survey Version 2 After Total Hip Arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo identify the factors having the greatest effect on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2) score after total hip arthroplasty (THA). DesignRetrospective review. SettingPrivate 150-bed hospital. ParticipantsPatients (N=659) who underwent initial THA for osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip between April 2007 and January 2009. A total of 138 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were seen at the first follow-up, while 108 patients were included in the second follow-up; all 30 patients excluded at the second follow-up underwent contralateral THA between follow-ups. The average time ± SD from surgery to first follow-up was 195.1±67.7 days, and that to second follow-up was 443.0±108.5 days. Patients' average age ± SD was 61.1±9.9 years at first follow-up and 61.3±10.3 years at second follow-up. Women accounted for 85.5% of patients at first follow-up and 85.2% at second follow-up. InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresEight subscales of the SF-36v2, age, sex, body mass index, complications, living alone, contralateral hip OA, range of hip joint motion, walking aids, and preoperative mental health (MH) values from the SF-36v2. ResultsCanonical correlation analysis showed that contralateral hip OA had a major effect on the SF-36v2 score at the first follow-up. At the second follow-up, excluding the 30 patients who had undergone contralateral THA, physical function measured by the SF-36v2 was strongly affected by age, and other items were strongly affected by preoperative MH. ConclusionsWhen using the SF-36v2 as an assessment scale after THA, adjustments should be made for contralateral hip OA. Moreover, age and preoperative MH should also be considered.

Preoperative Prediction of Ambulatory Status at 6 Months After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective procedure that provides patients with long-term relief from pain and enables them to resume their normal daily activities. Preoperative instruction about the functional outcomes and optimum goal of rehabilitation is helpful for patients undergoing THA. The purposes of this study were: (1) to examine the relationships between preoperative physical functions and ambulation following THA and (2) to identify optimal cutoff values for estimating ambulatory status at 6 months after THA. This was a retrospective study. The study participants were 204 patients who underwent a unilateral THA. Hip abductor and knee extensor strength were measured and the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) was conducted preoperatively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to self-reported walking ability at 6 months postoperatively: an independent ambulation group (n=118) and a cane-assisted ambulation group (n=86). Differences between the 2 groups were examined using an unpaired t test or the chi-square test. A stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with walking ability at 6 months postoperatively as a dependent variable and age, sex, contralateral hip osteoarthritis (ie, whether a participant had contralateral hip osteoarthritis or not), body mass index, hip abductor strength, knee extensor strength, and TUG score as independent variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify a cutoff point for classifying the participants into the 2 groups. A stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis selected 3 factors (age, knee extensor strength, and TUG score) as significant variables affecting the midterm ambulatory ability after THA. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that the midterm (ie, 6-month) ambulatory status after THA was more accurately predicted by the patient's TUG score (cutoff point=10 seconds, sensitivity=76.7%, specificity=93.2%, area under the curve=0.93) than by age and knee extensor strength. The categorization of ambulatory status in this study was based solely on self-reported walking ability. The findings indicate that patients with a preoperative TUG score of less than 10 seconds are likely to walk without an assistive device at 6 months after THA.

Predictors of Health-related Quality-of-life Change after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Various parameters have been considered as possible predictors of health-related quality-of-life outcomes after THA in patients with hip osteoarthritis. We hypothesized the preintervention health status is the main and more homogeneous predictor of changes of the different aspects of health-related quality-of-life outcomes, mental health status has an important influence on results, whereas other sociodemographic or clinical factors had only a punctual influence. All patients who fulfilled the selection criteria completed the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) before and 6 months after the intervention. Seven hundred eighty-eight patients completed the questionnaire before the intervention and 590 completed it (74.9%) at 6 months. The preintervention score in each SF-36 and WOMAC domain and the SF-36 mental health domain predicted changes after the intervention. Female gender, having comorbidities, contralateral hip osteoarthritis, or back pain predicted less improvement on some SF-36 domains. Older age, the presence of contralateral hip osteoarthritis, or back pain predicted less improvement on some of the WOMAC domains. Preintervention health status, measured by the WOMAC or SF-36, and mental health status uniformly predicted health-related quality-of-life changes, whereas some clinical parameters predicted some domains. SF-36 and WOMAC seem to be appropriate tools for predicting THA outcomes. Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

変形性股関節症に対する関節固定術の術後成績

We reviewed 18 cases of arthrodesis for hip osteoarthritis at advanced or terminal stage. The average age at operation was 43 years old (22-52), and the mean postoperative period was 10 years (2-20). The mean walking and daily activity life (ADL) JOA scores were 14.8 and 17.0 points, respectively. Although most cases showed good walking and ADL scores, the results of 3 cases with contralateral hip osteoarthritis at operation were poor. Most of the patients could go up and down the stairs without any support, sit on chairs, and put socks on the operated limb by themselves. On the contrary, many could cut the toe nails of the operated limb nor sit on the floor (SEIZA). There was a tendency for gradual increage in low back pain or contralateral-sided knee joint pain after arthrodesis in patients with there symptoms. The degree of pain was low, and no cases underwent operation of the lumbar spine or knee joints after hip arthrodesis. There results suggest that arthrodesis is a promising operation for hemilateral hip osteoarthritis of young patients, especially those who need to stand or walk for long periods in their work.