Contralateral C7 Research Articles

Anatomical study of single incision contralateral C7 nerve transfer through subdural pathway

ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of single incision C7 nerve transfer surgery through the subarachnoid pathway on the healthy side through anatomical research.MethodFour fresh frozen cadaver specimens were used for the study. Observe and measure the length of C7 nerve root fibers. Divide the front root into 3 bundles and the rear root into 5 bundles.ResultThe C7 nerve has a filamentous structure, arranged symmetrically on both sides, and the length of the root fibers gradually shortens from top to bottom. The length of the left anterior root decreased from (12.25 ± 0.68) mm to (9.75 ± 1.40) mm, the length of the right anterior root decreased from (12.95 ± 1.49) mm to (10.00 ± 2.00) mm, the length of the left posterior root decreased from (15.63 ± 1.55) mm to (12.38 ± 0.71) mm, and the length of the right posterior root decreased from (15.48 ± 1.37) mm to (12.30 ± 0.90) mm. The distance from the exit of the C7 nerve from the dura mater to the fusion site in 4 specimens was (10.98 ± 1.21) mm on the left and (10.98 ± 1.391) mm on the right. All four specimens have completed nerve bundle anastomosis.ConclusionFrom an anatomical perspective, it is feasible to anastomose the healthy side C7 nerve with the affected side root fibers in the dorsal bundle of the spinal cord after cutting off the dura mater.

Quantifying the Impact of C7 Spinal Nerve Harvest on Spontaneous, Patient-Initiated Movement of the Donor Upper Extremity.

Transfer of a healthy C7 spinal nerve is a tool for upper extremity reanimation in patients with severe brachial plexus injury (BPI). Its use remains controversial owing to concern for neurological injury to the donor arm. Utilizing wearable motion-sensor technology, we aimed to quantify donor arm morbidity after C7 spinal nerve harvest in patients with pan-BPI, reporting both the time and magnitude of donor arm movement in a real-world setting compared to healthy controls. Seventeen patients who underwent contralateral C7 (CC7) transfer for traumatic pan-BPI at least 2 years prior were compared to 14 healthy controls. Each participant wore an accelerometer on both arms for 7 consecutive days. The vector time (VT), or time of movement measured in hours/day, and the vector magnitude (VM), or magnitude of arm movement measured as a single vector magnitude per second, were collected and compared between groups. The correlation between VT and VM and time from C7 spinal nerve harvest was also calculated. At mean 7.7 years after C7 spinal nerve harvest, there was no difference between donor and control arms for VT (5.76±1.55] vs 5.45±1.22 hours, P = 0.56) or VM (2242236±753853 vs 1919223±579723 activity counts, P = 0.20), regardless of donor arm dominance. The C7 harvest cohort used the injured arm 53% of the time and with 27% of the power of the donor arm. There was no significant difference in time or magnitude of arm movement between donor arms and the arms of healthy controls.

Retro Oesophageal Transfer of Contralateral C7 in Birth Brachial Plexus Injury - A Retrospective Study.

Background: Presence of available healthy nerve roots on the injured side determines the outcome after nerve reconstruction. Paucity of nerve roots warrants contralateral C7 harvest for optimal results. We aim to study the risks and benefits of retro oesophageal transfer of contralateral C7 root in infants with birth brachial plexus injury. Methods: Study was carried out from 2017 to 2022 in 13 children who have undergone retro oesophageal transfer of contralateral C7 root to affected side. Follow-up period ranged from 8 to 60 months after the surgery. Motor power assessment was done using by active movement scale. Results: Average active movement score for abduction was found to be 6, elbow flexion 5.7, elbow extension 5.8, wrist extension 3, wrist flexion 4, finger flexion 4.8 and finger extension 3.8, respectively. No neurological deficits, limb length anomaly noted in the normal upper limb after contralateral C7 harvest. Conclusions: Retro oesophageal transfer of contralateral C7 is a safe technique in birth brachial plexus injury. The advantage of retro oesophageal transfer is reduction in the length of nerve grafts, thus helping in early neurotisation of distal forearm and hand muscles. The large axonal output from contralateral C7 can be used to reconstruct different nerves without any residual deficits on the normal side. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Midterm Outcomes of Surgical Reconstruction and Spontaneous Recovery of Upper-Extremity Paralysis Following Acute Flaccid Myelitis.

Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a disabling, poliomyelitis-like illness that mainly affects children. Although various surgical interventions are performed for intractable paralysis due to AFM, the timing of surgery and its long-term outcomes have yet to be established, especially for shoulder reconstruction. This study aimed to analyze the midterm outcomes of nonsurgically and surgically treated upper-extremity AFM and the factors influencing shoulder functional outcomes after surgical reconstruction. We retrospectively examined 39 patients with AFM in 50 upper extremities between 2011 and 2019. The degree of spontaneous recovery of completely paralyzed muscles was evaluated at a median of 3, 6, and 37 months after the onset of paralysis. Twenty-seven patients with 29 extremities underwent surgery involving nerve transfer, muscle-tendon transfer, or free muscle transfer for shoulder, elbow, and hand reconstruction. Patients with complete paralysis of shoulder abduction at 6 months did not show later recovery. Twenty-two patients with 24 extremities underwent shoulder surgery, and all but 1 were followed for at least 24 months after surgery. Although postoperative shoulder abduction recovery was similar between transfer of the spinal accessory nerve and of the contralateral C7 nerve root to the suprascapular nerve, the outcomes obtained with spinal accessory nerve transfer had more variability, likely related to latent spinal accessory nerve paralysis, shoulder instability related to pectoralis major paralysis, and the type of paralysis. Shoulder abduction recovery was also greatly affected by scapulothoracic joint movement. In contrast, the outcomes of the elbow flexion and hand reconstructions were more consistent and acceptable. All patients had loss of shoulder abduction, and restoration of shoulder function was less predictable and depended on the quality of the donor nerves and recovery of the synergistic muscles. Strict donor nerve selection and additional nerve transfer for shoulder reconstruction are imperative for satisfactory outcomes. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Trends and insights review. Nerve procedures in the management of upper limb spasticity.

This article reviews the recent advances or nerve-oriented surgical procedures in the treatment of the spastic upper limb. The idea to intervene on the nerve is not recent, but new trends have developed in nerve surgery over the past few years, stimulating experiments and research. Specific surgical procedures involving the nerves have been described at different levels from proximal to distal: at the cervical spinal cord and the dorsal root entry zone (rhizotomy), at the level of the roots (contralateral C7 transfer) or in the peripheral nerve, within the motor trunk (selective neurectomy) or as its branches penetrate the muscles (hyperselective neurectomy). All of these neurosurgical procedures are only effective on spasticity but do not address the other deformities, such as contractures and motor deficit. Additional procedures may have to be planned in conjunction with nerve procedures to optimize outcomes.

Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfer

Complex brachial plexus injuries with multiple or complete root avulsions make intraplexic reconstruction impossible in some cases. Such cases necessitate the use of extraplexic nerve donors such as the spinal accessory nerve or intercostal nerves. The contralateral C7 root represents a donor with a high axon count and can be used as an axon source in such cases. We summarise current indications, surgical technique and functional results after a contralateral C7 transfer in cases of brachial plexus injury, describing some of our own cases and including a selective literature review.

Rehabilitation protocols in neonates undergoing primary nerve surgery for upper brachial plexus palsy: A scoping review.

Surgical management is recommended in patients with severe neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) within the first 6 months of age to regain best possible function. Rehabilitation post-surgery remains relatively unexplored. This is a scoping review that explores, which rehabilitation modalities exist and how they vary for different microsurgical approaches in NBPP. A systematic search was conducted to include articles about upper trunk obstetric brachial plexus nerve microsurgery in pediatric patients that made mention of rehabilitation protocols. The aims of rehabilitation modalities varied and were grouped: "passive" movement to prevent joint contracture or stiffness, "active" or task-oriented movement to improve motor function, or "providing initial motor recovery". Surgical approach was described as either exploration of the brachial plexus (EBP) or nerve transfer without root exploration (NTwoRE). Technique was categorized into transfers and non-transfers. Thirty-six full-text articles were included. Initiation of rehabilitation was 22.26 days post-surgery. Twenty-eight studies were EBP, and six were NTwoRE. Of studies classifiable by aims, nine were "passive", nine were "active", and five were "providing initial motor recovery". Only 27.7% of EBP studies mentioned active therapy, while 75.0% of NTwoRE studies mentioned active therapy. The average age of patients in the EBP procedure category was 7.70 months, and NTwoRE was 17.76 months. Within transfers, the spinal accessory to suprascapular group was more likely to describe an active shoulder exercise therapy, whereas contralateral C7 group was more likely to describe "initial motor recovery", especially through the use of electrostimulation. All articles on electrostimulation recommended 15-20-minute daily treatment. Information on rehabilitation is limited post-nerve surgery in NBPP. However, when mentioned, the aims of these therapies vary with respect to surgical approach and technique. The type of therapy to employ may be a multifaceted decision, involving factors such as patient age, initial deformity, and goals of the care team.

Cadaveric Feasibility Study on Modified Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfer for Targeted Recovery in Hemiplegic Arms.

Contralateral cervical seventh (cC7) nerve to C7 transfer has been proven effective for treating spastic upper limb. However, for those whose major impairment is not in the C7 area, cC7 nerve transfer to other nerves may achieve a better outcome. The aim of this study was to explore the optimal surgical approach for transferring cC7 to 1 or 2 nerves in a cadaveric study, and to evaluate possible applications for patients with hemiplegia. Modified cC7 transfer to 1 (5 procedures) or 2 nonadjacent (3 procedures) nerve roots was proposed, and success rates of direct coaptation through 2 surgical approaches-the superficial surface of longus colli (sLC) and the deep surface of longus colli (dLC) approach-were compared. The length, diameter, and distance of relevant nerves were also measured in 25 cadavers. Compared with the sLC approach, the distance of the dLC approach was 1.1 ± 0.3 cm shorter. The success rates for the sLC and dLC approaches were as follows: cC7 to C5 surgery, 94%, and reached 98%; cC7 to C6 surgery, 54% and 96%; cC7 to C7 surgery, 42% and 94%; cC7 to C8 surgery, 34% and 94%; cC7 to T1 surgery, 24% and 62%; cC7 to C5C7 surgery, 74% and 98%; cC7 to C6C8 surgery, 54% and 98%; and cC7 to C7T1 surgery, 42% and 88%. The dLC approach greatly improved the direct coaptation rate for cC7 nerve transfer. The modified cC7 nerve transfer procedures are technically feasible for further application in clinic.

Treatment of Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries Using Double Free Muscle Transfer

The purpose of this study was to examine the surgical outcomes of double free muscle transfer (DFMT) performed in patients with complete brachial plexus injury (BPI). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of DFMT for 12 patients with complete BPI who were followed up for more than 2 years after the final muscle transplantation. Their mean age was 29 years (range, 18-41). Three patients underwent contralateral C7 nerve root transfer before the DFMT. The range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, elbow, and fingers was measured. Patient-reported outcome measures, including Disability of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand (DASH) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, were also examined. The mean shoulder ROM against gravity was 22° ± 8° in abduction and 33° ± 5° in flexion. Seven patients underwent phrenic nerve (PhN) transfer to the suprascapular nerves, and five exhibited asymptomatic lung impairment on spirography more than 2 years after PhN transfer. The mean elbow ROM against gravity was 111° ± 9° in flexion and -32° ± 7° in extension. All patients obtained elbow flexion >90° against a 0.5-kg weight. All patients obtained touch sensation and two recognized warm and cold sensations in the affected palm. The mean total active motion of the affected fingers was 44° ± 11°. All patients exhibited hook function of the hands. The mean preoperative and postoperative DASH scores were 70.3 ± 13.4 and 51.8 ± 15.9, respectively. The mean pain VAS score was 28 ± 31 at the final follow-up. Double free muscle transfer provided patients with complete brachial plexus palsy with good elbow flexion and hand hook functions. Therapeutic IV.

A Colombian's Group Experience Using Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfer for Brachial Plexus Trauma

A Colombian's Group Experience Using Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfer for Brachial Plexus Trauma

Quantifying Patient-Initiated Upper Extremity Movement After Surgical Reconstruction for Adult Pan-Brachial Plexus Injury.

Determining functional recovery in adult patients with traumatic pan-brachial plexus injury (pBPI) is hampered by the fact that most outcome measures are collected in the clinical setting and may not reflect arm use in the real world. This study's objectives were to demonstrate the feasibility of using wearable motion sensor technology to quantify spontaneous arm movement in adult patients with pBPI after surgical reconstruction and report the time and intensity with which the affected arm was used. Twenty-nine patients with pBPI who underwent surgical reconstruction at least 2 years prior were included in this study. Study participants wore an accelerometer on bilateral arms for 7 days. The vector time (VT) and magnitude with which each arm moved were collected and divided by the same values collected from the uninjured arm to generate a ratio (VT and vector magnitude [VM], respectively) to quantify differences between the arms. Correlations between VT, VM, and patient demographic and physician-elicited clinical measures were calculated. Patients were enrolled at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taiwan, and data analysis was performed at the University of Michigan. Twelve patients had pan-avulsion injuries, and 17 patients had C5 rupture with C6-T1 avulsion injuries. All underwent nerve reconstruction with contralateral C7 or ipsilateral C5 nerve roots as donors. At mean 7.3 years after surgery, the mean VT ratio was 0.54 ± 0.13 and the mean VM ratio was 0.30 ± 0.13. Both VT and VM ratios were significantly correlated with patient employment and movements at the elbow and forearm. Wearable motion detection technology can capture spontaneous, real-world movements of the arm in patients who have undergone surgical reconstruction for pBPI. Despite severe injuries, these patients are able to use their affected arm 50% of the time and with 30% of the intensity of their unaffected arm, which is positively correlated with return to work after injury. These data support the use of surgical reconstruction for pBPI.

Prespinal Versus Conventional Hemicontralateral C7 Nerve Transfer in the Treatment of Total Brachial Plexus Roots Avulsion Injuries: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 4 Years

Contralateral C7 (CC7)-to-median nerve transfer has been commonly used to restore hand function in brachial plexus injury. To shorten the nerve graft, the prespinal route was described and achieved direct coaptation when combined with humeral shortening osteotomy. The limb was positioned at 0° shoulder abduction and neutral head position. Given our concern about donor-site morbidity when harvesting the whole CC7 nerve and tension across the neurorrhaphy site after mobilization, we aimed to describe our modified prespinal route and compare its outcomes and complications with the conventional hemi-CC7 transfer. From 2004 to 2014, 39 patients with preganglionic total brachial plexus root avulsion injuries, with a minimum of 4 years of follow-up, were included. Overall, 20 and 19 patients underwent the conventional hemi-CC7-to-median nerve and hemi-CC7-to-lower trunk (LT) transfer through the modified prespinal route, respectively. The modified prespinal route was combined with bilateral clavicle shortening osteotomy to achieve direct coaptation to the LT at 45° shoulder abduction. The modified prespinal route showed the median period to achieve ≥M3 hand grip assessed in clinical follow-up was shorter (26.5 months vs 45.5 months), and a higher proportion of patients achieved ≥M3 hand grip recovery (63% vs 30%). One patient experienced symptomatic phrenic nerve injury; however, the hemidiaphragm fully recovered after 6 months. The long-term donor-site complication rate was 2.6%, including one sensory abnormality, and no permanent donor-site weakness after hemi-CC7 harvesting was observed. The modified prespinal route combined with clavicle osteotomy allowed direct coaptation to the LT and did not require head immobilization. It may allow a higher proportion of patients to achieve ≥M3 hand grip more quickly than conventional hemi-CC7 transfer. Therapeutic IV.

Contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer for central spastic arm paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The specific benefits of a contralateral cervical 7 nerve transplant in people with spastic paralysis of the upper extremity caused by cerebral nerve injury are unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of contralateral C7 nerve transfer for central spastic paralysis of the upper extremity, we conducted a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis. PRISMA guidelines were used to search the databases for papers comparing the efficacy of contralateral cervical 7 nerve transfer vs. rehabilitation treatment from January 2010 to August 2022. The finishing indications were expressed using SMD ± mean. A meta-analysis was used to assess the recovery of motor function in the paralyzed upper extremity. The meta-analysis included three publications. One of the publications offers information about RCTs and non-RCTs. A total of 384 paralyzed patients were included, including 192 who underwent CC7 transfer and 192 who received rehabilitation. Results from all patients were combined and revealed that patients who had CC7 transfer may have regained greater motor function in the Fugl-Meyer score (SMD 3.52, 95% CI = 3.19-3.84, p < 0.00001) and had superior improvement in range of motion compared to the rehabilitation group (SMD 2.88, 95% CI = 2.47-3.29, p < 0.00001). In addition, the spasticity in the paralyzed upper extremity significantly improved in patients with CC7 transfer (SMD -1.42, 95% CI = -1.60 to -1.25, p < 0.00001). Our findings suggested that a contralateral C7 nerve transfer, which has no additional adverse effects on the healthy upper limb, is a preferable method to restore motor function.

Impact of Severe Cervical Foraminal Stenosis on Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfer Outcomes

This report presents the case of a 67-year-old male patient with severe bilateral C6/7 foraminal stenoses who underwent contralateral seventh cervical nerve (C7) transfer as a treatment for left spastic hemiparesis resulting from a right middle cerebral artery infarction. The initial postoperative results showed improved spasticity and motor function, but these gains plateaued and even receded, unlike other studies that noted progress at 10–18 months post-surgery. We hypothesized that the presence of C7 radiculopathy due to severe cervical foraminal stenosis may affect long-term outcomes after contralateral C7 transfer and serve as a contraindication for this surgery. These findings emphasize the importance of thoroughly assessing patients with cervical foraminal stenosis and the associated risk of radiculopathy before considering a contralateral C7 transfer. Further research is needed to assess the prevalence of cervical foraminal stenosis in patients undergoing contralateral C7 transfer and explore alternative surgical approaches or adjunctive treatments to optimize postoperative outcomes.

Modified contralateral C7 transfer to restore ulnar nerve function without sacrificing median nerve recovery: an experimental study.

Contralateral C7 (cC7) transfer is a technique used in patients with total brachial plexus avulsion. An ulnar nerve graft (UNG) is usually used, as intrinsic function is not expected to be restored due to length of reinnervation required. In this study, we attempted to improve intrinsic function recovery by preserving the deep branch of the ulnar nerve (dbUN) and reanimating it with the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) after cC7 transfer. Fifty-four rats were divided into the following three groups: Group A, traditional cC7 transfer to the median nerve with a UNG; Group B, cC7 transfer preserving and repairing the dbUN with the terminal branch of the AIN; Group C, same as Group B; however, the dbUN was coapted after 1 month with the AIN. At 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively, the results of electrodiagnostic and histomorphometric examinations of the interosseous muscle were significantly better in Groups B and C, without affecting AIN recovery. In conclusion, the modified cC7 transfer technique can potentially improve intrinsic function recovery without affecting median nerve recovery.

Current strategies of the brachial plexus palsy management

The importance of brachial plexus palsy treatment is associated with its significant severity, along with Brachial plexus palsies can be treated by means of many different surgical and non-surgical methods which allow regeneration of full efficiency of the affected limb. The choice of method depends on such factors as type and region of injury, patient’s age or clinical presentation of the injury. The purpose of this review is to present current strategies of treating brachial plexus palsies, depending on therapeutic needs of the particular patient. This is a review study based upon selective literature overview, with emphasis on works published within past 13 years. 6 separate methods of brachial plexus palsy were assessed, without distinction of the reason of palsy occurring. Some of the invasive methods include operative treatment performed directly on occupied nervous tissue, such as microneural plexus reconstruction and nerve transfers (lower subscapular nerve transfer and contralateral C7 nerve transfer) whilst the others revolve around restoration of function of affected neighboring structures by themselves, e.g. shoulder tendon transfers. Rehabilitation and botulinum toxin-based treatment are non-operative methods revolving around enhancement of the function of the affected upper limb. Main measure of effectiveness of the treatment is assessment of the range of motion of the affected limb (ROM). There is still not enough information available regarding long-term efficiency of microneural plexus reconstruction and botulinum toxin-based treatment. They require further investigation while other methods are used commonly.

Effect and safety of C7 neurotomy at the intervertebral foramen in patients with chronic poststroke aphasia: a multicentre, randomised, controlled study protocol

IntroductionAphasia affects many stroke survivors; therefore, effective treatments are urgently needed. Preliminary clinical findings have suggested an association between contralateral C7–C7 cross nerve transfer and recovery from chronic aphasia. Randomised...

Contralateral C7 nerve transfer for severe pediatric brachial plexus injuries: donor site morbidity.

Pediatric brachial plexus injuries (BPI) can have a devastating impact on upper extremity function. With localized lesions, nerve grafting and transfers are well-described. However, reconstruction of pan-plexus (C5-T1) injuries (PPI) requires donor nerves outside of the brachial plexus. The cross C7 (CC7) nerve transfer extended with sural nerve grafts to the contralateral recipient nerve offers the advantage of supplying robust donor axons. Though controversial in the West, CC7 transfer is routine in many Asian centers. We present a case series of pediatric patients who underwent CC7 transfer for BPI. Our objective was to catalog donor site morbidity incurred by transferring the C7 nerve root. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our university. patients under 18years old that underwent CC7 nerve transfer for BPI at our health system between 2021 and 2022. A chart review was completed to collect demographic and outcomes data. Three patients underwent a complete CC7 transfer between 2021 and 2022 for BPI reconstruction. All patients underwent concomitant additional nerve transfers. Post-operative donor site sensory deficits were minimal and transient in all but one patient, who reported mild but persistent paresthesia of the donor side hand with movement of recipient side digits; however, no patients suffered donor site motor deficits (Table 1). We conclude that CC7 nerve transfer is a safe surgical option to provide additional donor motor axons for PPI in pediatric patients.

A rat model of modified contralateral C7 transfer permitting ulnar nerve recovery

BackgroundContralateral C7 transfer (cC7) is an important treatment for total brachial plexus avulsion (TBPA), which sacrifices the recovery of the ulnar nerve (UN). The present study aimed to introduce an animal model of modified cC7 that preserved the deep branch of ulnar nerve (dbUN) and verify its feasibility. MethodsAnatomical study: Lengths, diameters, and axon counts of dbUN and anterior interosseous (AIN) branches in six rats were measured.In vivo surgery: 18 rats were divided into three groups. Group A: Traditional cC7. Group B: Modified cC7 finished in one stage. Group C: Modified cC7 and AIN branch anastomosed with dbUN one month after the first stage. Electrophysiological examinations, muscle wet weight, muscle cross-sectional areas, and nerve axon counts were evaluated six months postoperatively. ResultsAnatomical study: The distances from dbUN and AIN branches to the midpoint of the inner and outer epicondyles connection of the humerus, diameters, and axon numbers of dbUN and AIN branches were analyzed, then AIN terminal branch (tbAIN) was anastomosed with dbUN.In vivo surgery: The differences in median nerve fiber counts were not significant. There were more UN axons in group A than in groups B and C. In electrophysiological examinations, muscle wet weight and cross-sectional area of the flexor digitorum profundus showed no significant difference, but the second interosseus cross-sectional areas in groups B and C were significantly larger than in group A. ConclusionsThis study established an animal model of preserving dbUN in cC7 and verified its feasibility. The possibility of restoring dbUN was established.

Anatomical Study of Cross-Transfer of the Contralateral C7 Nerve Through the Posterior Epidural Pathway of the Cervical Spine for the Treatment of Spastic Paralysis of the Upper Limbs

This study explored the safety and feasibility of surgical treatment of spastic paralysis of the central upper extremity by contralateral cervical 7 nerve transfer via the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine. Five fresh head and neck anatomical specimens were employed to simulate contralateral cervical 7 nerve transfer through the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine. The relevant anatomical landmarks and surrounding anatomical relationships were observed under a microscope, and the relevant anatomical data were measured and analysed. The posterior cervical incision revealed the cervical 6 and 7 laminae, and lateral exploration revealed the cervical 7 nerve. The length of the cervical 7 nerve outside the intervertebral foramen was measured to be 6.4 ± 0.5 cm. The cervical 6 and cervical 7 laminae were opened with a milling cutter. The cervical 7 nerve was extracted from the inner mouth of the intervertebral foramen, and its length was 7.8 ± 0.3 cm. The shortest distance of the cervical 7 nerve transfer via the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine was 3.3 ± 0.3 cm. Cross-transfer surgery of the contralateral cervical 7 nerve via the posterior epidural pathway of the cervical spine can effectively avoid the risk of nerve and blood vessel damage in anterior cervical nerve 7 transfer surgery; the nerve transfer distance is short, and nerve transplantation is not required. This approach may become a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of central upper limb spastic paralysis.