Contralateral Axillary Metastasis Research Articles

ASO Author Reflections: Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Prognostic Variability and Benefits of Surgical Treatment.

ASO Author Reflections: Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Prognostic Variability and Benefits of Surgical Treatment.

ASO Visual Abstract: Survival After the Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer.

ASO Visual Abstract: Survival After the Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer.

Survival After Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer

BackgroundDespite stage IV categorization, survival outcomes for breast cancer patients who experience contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis (CAM) remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes for patients with metachronous CAM to provide insights into its prognosis and treatment recommendations.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent curative surgery for breast cancer and experienced CAM as the first site of distant metastasis (DM) during the follow-up period between January 2001 and April 2023. Survival outcomes of the CAM patients were compared with those of breast cancer patients with other DM via propensity score-matching (PSM).ResultsThe study identified 40 breast cancer patients with metachronous CAM. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 39.6%, and the progression-free survival was 39.4%. The patients with CAM exhibited marginally better OS than the patients with DM (p = 0.071), but survival similar to that of the patients with isolated supraclavicular node recurrence (SCN) (p = 0.509). Moreover, matching of CAM with DM using two PSM models showed a consistently insignificant survival difference (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; p = 0.124 vs. HR, 1.19; p = 0.542). Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTRs) were experienced by 12 patients before or concurrently with the CAM. These patients exhibited significantly better survival than the remaining patients (HR, 0.28; p = 0.024).ConclusionThe breast cancer patients with CAM showed survival similar to that for the patients with DM, supporting the current stage IV classification of the CAM. However, CAM associated with IBTR exhibited superior survival outcomes, suggesting that this subset of CAM may benefit from treatments with curative intent.

Abstract PO3-05-13: A Multi-Institutional Review of Contralateral Axillary Metastases: Time for Reclassification as Local-Regional Event?

Abstract Background Current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) breast cancer staging considers contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) stage IV disease (M1). Retrospective studies suggest that women with CAM have improved overall survival (OS) compared to those with distant metastasis (M1) and/or comparable OS to locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). These studies support consideration of curative intent treatment; however, they contain heterogeneous cohorts with highly variable treatment strategies. We sought to evaluate treatment and outcomes in a well-defined CAM cohort treated with contemporary systemic and locoregional therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study to compare OS of patients with CAM matched 1:3 on age +/- 5 years to LABC (defined as cN2-3 and/or pN2-3), and to non-CAM M1. CAM patients classified as type 1) de novo CAM, synchronous with the contralateral primary, 2) metachronous isolated CAM in the setting of prior surgical and/or radiation treatment to primary index cancer, 3) synchronous with, or 4) metachronous after an in-breast or axillary nodal recurrence of the primary index cancer. The M1 cohort included de novo and recurrent metastasis with varied sites and number of metastasis. OS was defined as time from CAM diagnosis to death or last follow-up for CAM patients; time from primary diagnosis to death or last follow-up for LABC; and time from metastatic diagnosis to death or last follow-up for M1. Unadjusted OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of group with OS after adjustment for covariates Results We identified 57 CAM and 155 LABC from 8 institutions (2016-2022), and 632 M1 from a single institution. The median age was similar between groups (CAM=59 years, LABC=58, M1=57, p=0.44), and there were no statistically significant differences in hormone receptor status (p=0.25). There were more Non-Hispanic Black patients in the M1 cohort compared to CAM or LABC (p< 0.001). The majority of CAM cases were delayed metachronous from the index cancer (type 2, 35.1%), or synchronous with a recurrence (type 3, 33.3%). Type 1 (de novo, 14%) and type 4 (delayed metachronous after breast cancer recurrence, 17.5%) were less frequent. Among CAM patients, 49.1% were hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-), 22.8% HR-/HER2-, 10.5% HR+/HER2+, and 5.3% HR-/HER2+. Comparing CAM versus LABC, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was more commonly seen in CAM (82.5% vs 66.5%), as was grade 3 (45.6% vs 35.5%), and triple negative (22.8% vs 13.5%). Conversely, in LABC, treatment of the primary index cancer more frequently included chemotherapy (CAM=71.9%, LABC=92.3%), mastectomy (CAM=54.4%, LABC 74.2%), and adjuvant radiation (CAM=73.7%, LABC=90.3%). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and hormone receptor status, both CAM and M1 had inferior survival to LABC (Table 1), but with a 2.4-fold difference for CAM (95% CI 1.42-4.07, p=0.001) versus a 6.3-fold difference for M1 (95% CI 4.29-9.23, p=< 0.001). Discussion In this contemporary, multi-institution study, we demonstrated that CAM patients selected for presumed curative intent treatment experienced improved OS when compared to stage IV (M1) patients. Our data adds additional support for re-evaluating the current stage IV designation, in favor of N3, and consideration of curative intent treatment in this disease. Table. Adjusted* Overall Survival Comparing Patients with Breast Cancer Contralateral Axillary Metastasis (CAM) to those with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) and Metastatic Disease (M1) *Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, hormone receptors. Citation Format: Meghan R. Flanagan, Stephanie Downs-Canner, Samantha Thomas, Astrid Botty van de bruele, Margaret Lillie, Kristalyn Gallagher, Tammeza Gibson, James Jakub, Alexandra Verosky, Sarah Tevis, Malia Brennan, Francys Verdial, Jennifer Q. Zhang, Leisha Elmore, Jennifer Plichta, Laura Rosenberger. A Multi-Institutional Review of Contralateral Axillary Metastases: Time for Reclassification as Local-Regional Event? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-13.

Axillary metastasis from occult breast cancer and synchronous contralateral breast cancer initially suspected to be cancer with contralateral axillary metastasis: a case report

BackgroundInitial detection of axillary metastasis without known ipsilateral breast cancer could be a challenging diagnostic problem. Four options could be considered for the primary site of the malignancy: ipsilateral occult breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer, tumors in other distant organs, and primary axillary malignancy itself. Although breast cancer is known as the most common primary cancer of axillary metastasis, both occult breast cancer and breast cancer with contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) are rare.Case presentationA 63-year-old woman presented with palpable right axillary metastasis, and a tiny contralateral breast cancer was detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. No lesion was found in the ipsilateral right breast and contralateral left axillary region. Both right axillary metastasis and contralateral breast cancer were positive for estrogen receptor. The diagnostic issue was to determine whether the axillary metastasis was derived from the contralateral breast cancer or not. Right axillary dissection and left breast conserving surgery were performed. The final diagnosis was occult breast cancer that presented with axillary lymph node metastasis and early-stage synchronous contralateral breast cancer, based on clinical evidence and postoperative pathologic results. After surgery, systemic treatment and whole breast irradiation were administered. No recurrence or metastasis was observed 15 months postoperatively.ConclusionFor accurate diagnosis of axillary metastasis without detectable ipsilateral breast cancer, multifaceted diagnostic approach considering clinical, radiological, and pathological evidences is required.

Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

Nearly one-third of patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) present with de novo stage IV disease. There are limited data on frequency and clinical outcomes of contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) in IBC with no consensus diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Frequency of synchronous CAM was calculated in unilateral IBC patients at a single center (10/2004-6/2019). Clinicopathologic variables, diagnostic evaluation, treatment received, and overall survival (OS) were assessed and compared. Of 588 unilateral IBC patients, 49 (8.3%) had synchronous CAM. Of these, 32 (65.3%) also presented with metastatic disease at another distant site. CAM was not associated with age, tumor laterality, breast cancer subtype, grade, or cN stage (p > 0.05). The sensitivity/specificity to detect CAM was as follows: mammography (18.2%/99.2%), ultrasound (92.3%/95.5%), PET (90.1/99.1%), and MRI (76.0%/98.6%). Following systemic therapy, 22 patients had contralateral axillary surgery, and 18 received adjuvant contralateral nodal radiation. On multivariable analysis including tumor receptor subtypes, patients with stage IV-isolated CAM has statistically similar survival to stage III patients (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.70-2.69, p = 0.36). Patients with Stage IV non-CAM (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.66-2.85, p < 0.001) and stage IV-CAM plus other distant metastasis (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.59-4.16, p < 0.001) had higher risk of death (reference: stage III disease). CAM in IBC was diagnosed in 8.3% of patients at presentation and was best identified by ultrasound and PET. We recommend routine contralateral axillary ultrasound as part of staging for all IBC patients. Diagnosis of CAM is a key first step toward much-needed prospective clinical trials evaluating management and outcomes of CAM in IBC.

ASO Visual Abstract: Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer

ASO Visual Abstract: Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis and molecular changes in second primary breast cancer: a case report

: Contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) is rather rare in primary breast cancer. In this case, we present a 46-year-old female patient who underwent left breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and left axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Two years later, an enlarged lymph node was found in her right axilla. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast displayed a left breast mass with multiple internal mammary lymph nodes and abnormal lymph nodes in the right axillary region. However, no abnormalities were found in the right breast. The left breast mass was diagnosed as invasive carcinoma by core needle biopsy. During the operation, we suggested that the contralateral lymph nodes were metastatic from the second primary breast cancer by preoperative 99mTc injection around the left breast. The patient underwent left mastectomy and right axillary lymph node dissection. The postoperative pathology was diagnosed as metachronous secondary primary left breast cancer, in which the initial presentation was lymph node metastasis to the contralateral axilla of the left breast. Therefore, we propose that CAM may be more common in second primary or recurrent breast cancer. It should be treated as locoregional extension. Preoperative lymph node markers are important to identify whether contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis occurs from a second primary breast cancer.

Aberrant Lymphatic Drainage in the Contralateral Axilla in Patients with Isolated Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

The management and implications of aberrant lymphatic drainage in the contralateral axilla during repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with isolated ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) are not well understood. We analyzed the outcomes of contralateral SLNB in cases of isolated IBTR compared to ipsilateral SLNB. We conducted a retrospective review of cases reported at Samsung Medical Center between 1995 and 2015. All patients with isolated IBTR that underwent ipsilateral and contralateral SLNB with clinically negative lymph nodes but lymphatic drainage on the ipsilateral or contralateral axilla were included. Among 233 patients with isolated IBTR, 31 patients underwent repeat SLNB, 11 underwent ipsilateral SLNB, and nine underwent contralateral SLNB. None of the patients showed contralateral axillary metastasis in cases with isolated IBTR in the absence of clinically suspicious drainage on the contralateral axilla. Contralateral drainage was associated with a longer interval to IBTR (68.4 vs.18.6 months, p = 0.001) and the overall median follow-up duration (102.6 vs. 45.4 months, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the recurrence after the second operation (1 of 11 vs. 1 of 9, p = 1.000). Only one patient in both groups experienced recurrence after the second operation. Two patients (22.2%) who underwent contralateral SLNB had lymphedema. We demonstrate that no patient had contralateral metastasis in patients with isolated IBTR in the absence of clinically suspicious drainage in the contralateral axilla. Further study is warranted to better understand and optimize the management of these rare and challenging cases.

Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer : case report

Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer : case report

Solitary contralateral axillary metastasis in breast cancer: Is it a true distant spread?

Solitary contralateral axillary metastasis in breast cancer: Is it a true distant spread?

Contralateral Axillary Metastases in Breast Cancer: Stage IV Disease or a Locoregional Event?

Contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) in breast cancer is presently treated as a stage IV disease. We hypothesized that this disease pattern is a manifestation of direct aberrant lymphatic drainage and would behave more similar to advanced locoregional disease. This is a single-site, retrospective review of patients with biopsy-proven CAM from 2008-2017. Descriptive analysis was performed. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The median disease-free interval from primary tumor treatment to diagnosis of CAM was 68 months (range, 36-155 months). This population had aggressive disease (74% local recurrences and 61% clinical evidence of cutaneous or underlying muscular invasion) and extensive locoregional therapy (70% radiated, 57% mastectomy, and 65% axillary lymph node dissection) before their presentation with CAM. Fifteen (65.2%) patients recurred after treatment of CAM; the median recurrence-free interval was 11 months (range, 5-23 months), and 12 (52.2%) patients developed distant metastases. The median distant metastasis-free survival was 14 months (range, 11-23 months), and the median overall survival was 31 months (range, 22-67.5 months). Development of CAM is associated with aggressive disease and extensive prior locoregional surgery and/or radiation. The short recurrence-free interval and high progression to additional stage IV disease suggest these patients behave similar to traditional stage IV patients with resected oligometastatic disease.

Contralateral axillary metastasis: is surgical treatment the best option?

Contralateral axillary metastasis: is surgical treatment the best option?

Contralateral axillary metastasis: is surgical treatment the best option?

Contralateral axillary metastasis: is surgical treatment the best option?

Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Contralateral Axilla at Initial Presentation of a Breast Cancer Patient: Case Report.

The main basin for breast lymphatic drainage is ipsilateral axilla. However, extra-axillary drainage may be seen in some patients. The most common extra-axillary site is internal mammary chain, while contralateral axillary drainage is an extremely rare situation in previously untreated patients. We describe a case of untreated right breast retroareolar carcinoma with contralateral axillary drainage detected on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. Contralateral axillary dissection was performed based on the result of frozen section examination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) which turned out to burden micrometastasis. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma metastasis in 17 out of 22 lymph nodes from the ipsilateral axillary dissection, whereas 14 lymph nodes from contralateral axillary dissection other than the SLN were nonmetastatic. In our opinion, determination of contralateral axillary metastasis in primary staging process had a major contribution to the management of the patient.

Characteristics of and therapeutic options for contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

Aim Contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) from breast cancer is uncommon. This papers aims to identify the features of our patients with CAM, as well as clarify management options. Methods We reviewed all of our breast cancer patients during the period from 2004 to 2009. All patients with a proven pathological diagnosis of CAM were included. Patients were evaluated for demographics, tumor features and management modalities. Results A total of 21 patients were included, forming 1.9% of our breast cancer population. The median age was 51 years (range 29–71). Twelve patients had large central or diffuse tumors. Most of the tumors were of invasive ductal type (95%), of high grade (81%) and with lymphovascular invasion (81%). The majority of cases were locally advanced (stage III: 90%). Hormonal receptor positivity and HER-2 overexpression were seen in 48% and 42% of cases, respectively. Those pathological features were significantly worse than those of patients without CAM. Ten patients had synchronous and 11 patients had metachronous CAM. Treatment modalities included axillary dissection, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Four patients died from metastatic disease and 5 patients are still alive without evidence of metastasis. Conclusion CAM is associated with tumors with aggressive pathological features. Hormonal therapy is associated with an excellent response in patients whose tumors are hormone-receptor positive. Axillary dissection is indicated in patients with early-stage tumors, when there is no response to systemic therapy, or for palliation. It is associated with excellent local control.