Contralateral Auditory Stimulation Research Articles

Experimental study of displays in contralateral acoustic reflex auditory stimulation.

The results of an experimental study of manifestations of the acoustic reflex with contralateral auditory stimulation at a frequency of 1 kHz are presented, and the principal possibility and informativeness of its use for diagnosing the diseases of the organ of hearing are demonstrated. The principal difference of the developed approach is the use of polyharmonic signal for measuring acoustic reflex manifestations during contralateral stimulation, which allows accelerating the examination procedure.

The influence of hypothermia on outer hair cells of the cochlea and its efferents.

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) were recorded in 21 guinea-pigs undergoing hypothermia. The minimal average body temperature during cooling was 26 degrees C/24.9 degrees C measured orally or rectally, respectively. The animals were subsequently warmed to normal body temperature. A clear influence of body temperature on TEOAE could be documented. During cooling the amplitude and reproducibilities decreased, disappearing completely at a mean temperature below 28.5 degrees C (oral) and 27.3 degrees C (rectal). The emissions reappeared during rewarming at a mean temperature of 30.1 degrees C (oral) and 30.8 degrees C (rectal). Contralateral auditory stimulation (CAS) led to a decrease of the amplitudes of TEOAE during cooling down to a mean of 33 degrees C/32 degrees C (oral/rectal temperature). During rewarming, influences of the CAS could be recognized, again at an oral temperature above 35 degrees C. The changes to the TEOAE observed in these experiments suggest that hypothermia affects not only the outer hair cells (OHC) of the cochlea but also the efferent supply to the cochlea.

Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions

Transient Evoked otoacoustical Emissions (TEOAEs) express the micromechanical activity of the cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs). The inhibitory effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation and of visual attention tasks on TEOAE amplitude is well-established. Contralateral auditory stimulation and attention affect cochlear mi.cromechanics via the medial olivocochlear efferent system. The present study is a quantitative comparison of the individual and combined effects of these two inhibitory phenomena in the same subjects. TEOAEs were recorded in seven normal-hearing subjects in absence of inhibitory stimulus (S1), under contralateral 95 dB SPL white-noise stimulation (S2), during a visual attention task (S3) and with simultaneous presentation of both forms of stimulus (S4). Significant reductions in TEOAE amplitude were found with contralateral stimulation (S2) and visual attention (S3) ( p = 0.01 and 0.05 respectively), in confirmation of previous studies. The inhibitory effect of combined stimulation (S4) was found to be yet more significant ( p = 0.004) than the inhibition obtained with each stimulation presented alone.

Contralateral auditory stimulation and otoacoustic emissions: a review of basic data in humans.

The influence of contralateral auditory stimulation on otoacoustic emissions (OAE), spontaneous OAE, evoked OAE and acoustic distortion products, can be summarized as follows: (1) alteration (mainly a decrease) of OAE amplitude; (2) alteration of response spectrum (upward shift frequency of SOAE); (3) alteration of phase; (4) effect dependent on intensity of contralateral stimulation; (5) effect inversely dependent on intensity of ipsilateral stimulation; (6) frequency specificity of the suppressive effect. Involvement of the medial olivocochlear bundle is highly probable but one cannot exclude a double pathway including also the acoustic reflex.

Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans

It is now generally accepted that otoacoustic emissions (OAE) represent the only objective and non-intrusive means of functional exploration of the active micromechanical characteristics of the outer hair cells of the organ of Corti. Previous studies showed a decrease of the transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in humans, during acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear, and attributed this effect to the medial efferent system. Such an effect has been shown on acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) in guinea pigs, but has not been investigated for DPOAEs recorded in humans, although DPOAEs represent the easiest means of exploring active micromechanical cochlear properties both in humans and in laboratory animals. The present study sought to investigate the existence and characteristics of a contralateral auditory stimulation effect on DPOAEs recorded in humans. This study shows that contralateral broad-band noise (BBN) has a suppressive effect on DPOAEs recorded from 0.5 kHz to 5 kHz. This effect is not due to air conduction, as no change in the noise floor occurred under increasing contralateral stimulation, and as no reduction in DPOAE amplitude was obtained in subjects whose contralateral ear was sealed with a plastic ear plug. Moreover, cross-over attenuation by bone transmission has been ruled out, as no change in DPOAE amplitude was recorded in the healthy ear of total unilaterally deaf patients during acoustic stimulation of the deaf ear. The effect seen was not entirely due to the acoustic reflex, as it was found and could indeed be even greater in subjects with no acoustic reflex. Results presented here show that the contralateral BBN effect is greater at low levels of ipsilateral stimulation, which leads us to discuss the involvement of both passive and active mechanisms in DPOAE generation at high stimulation levels. The contralateral BBN effect seems to be greater in mid frequency cochlear regions. There is strong evidence that the medial efferent system is involved and that afferent and efferent inputs are, at least partly, integrated at a brainstem level in order to ensure cochlear interaction. DPOAEs provide an interesting model for functional exploration of the efferent system, since they seem to be the only type of otoacoustic emission that can be recorded in both humans and in the majority of animals, and since results are obtained in the same way from both animals and humans, which allows experimental animal models very close to the human model.

Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?

Otoacoustic emission (OAE) generation mechanisms reside in the active micromechanical properties of the organ of Corti, and especially in the outer hair cells (OHCs). OHCs are strongly innervated by medial efferent olivo-cochlear fibres. Decrease of the intensity of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs) and modification of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) during acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear have already been shown in humans. Similar results were obtained in guinea pigs with a decrease of 2F1-F2 acoustic distortion products (DPOAEs) and a suppression of the effect with sectioning of the floor of the fourth ventricle. The present study sought to investigate the influence of contralateral auditory stimulation on DPOAEs recorded in humans. It shows a decrease in DPOAE intensity for all frequencies, at levels above 45 dB SPL of contralateral broad band noise. This effect was found at levels of contralateral BBN well below the acoustic reflex threshold, and in subjects without acoustic reflex. Moreover, the influence of transcranial transmission could be ruled out since no effect was found when contralateral BBN applied to the altered ear of totally unilaterally deaf patients. Thus, the contralateral acoustic stimulation effect on DPOAEs provides a new means of functional exploration of the medial efferent system in humans. The effect obtained is more ample at low primary frequency levels. Moreover, as DPOAEs are known to be stronger and to show more irregular input/output function patterns in the vicinity of an SOAE, the influence of contralateral auditory stimulation was studied for DPOAEs recorded at 10 Hz, 50 Hz and 150 Hz from an SOAE frequency.

Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects

The present study investigates the possibility that contralateral auditory stimulation along medial efferent system pathways may alter active cochlear micromechanics and hence affect evoked oto-acoustic emissions in humans. A first experiment, involving 21 healthy subjects showed reduction of oto-acoustic emission amplitude under low intensity contralateral white noise (from 30 dB SPL, 10 dB SL, upwards). The effect is found for intensities below the acoustic reflex threshold (85.2 dB HL). A second experiment, involving 10 of the above 21 subjects, sought to rule out any technical artefact. Recording was again carried out, but after sealing of the contralateral ear with a silicon putty plug. No contralateral intensity effect on oto-acoustic emission amplitude was found for contralateral intensities below 65 dB SPL. In subjective perception terms (dB SL) an effect was found under sealing when the sound reached or passed above the 10 dB SL level. These two findings confirm the preceding experiment. The third experiment investigated the role of transcranial transmission of the contralateral auditory stimulus. 16 subjects having total unilateral deafness and one healthy ear were tested by the same procedure as above. No fall-off in oto-acoustic emission amplitude was found for contralateral stimuli equal to or less than 80 dB SPL. There is thus a contralateral auditory stimulus effect on active cochlear micromechanics. The most appropriate explanation involves the medial cochlear efferent system, excited at brainstem level via the afferent auditory pathways. Alteration of active cochlear micromechanics seems promising at a basic level, pointing, as it does, to an interactive cochlear functioning which can be investigated by simple, non-intrusive, objective techniques which can be used with human subjects. We have here a model for functional exploration of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Localization of Auditory Response Sources Using Magnetoencephalography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetoencephalography offers the possibility of localizing accurately and noninvasively the source of intracranial currents associated with normal and abnormal brain activity. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and across-subject reliability of localization of cortical sources responding to ipsilateral and contralateral auditory stimulation. Magnetic evoked fields to both stimulation conditions were measured in eight consecutive normal subjects, and the cortical sources of these fields were estimated on the basis of these measurements. Subsequent projection of the source location coordinates onto magnetic resonance images showed that in all subjects the sources were accurately estimated to fall in the vicinity of the auditory cortex and that two separate sources may account for the response to ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation.

Evidence for a contribution of the auditory cortex to audiospinal facilitation in man.

Facilitation of the spinal monosynaptic reflex by auditory stimulation has been demonstrated previously in animals and man. Analysis of the time course of audiospinal facilitation (ASF) in normal subjects is reported. The role of the cerebral cortex in the control of audiospinal facilitation was investigated in 32 patients with anatomically well-circumscribed lesions, the precise topography of which was determined stereotaxically. Lesions of the caudal part (Heschl's gyrus and temporal plane) of the superior temporal gyrus selectively depressed ASF evoked by contralateral auditory stimulation. In contrast, lesions in temporal, parietal and occipital lobes had no effect. Results obtained with frontal lobe lesions were not homogeneous. The specific involvement of auditory cortex in the gating of behavioral audiomotor reactions is discussed.

Magnetic auditory evoked fields: Interhemispheric asymmetry

Magnetic auditory evoked fields (MAEFs) were recorded from the right (11 subjects) and the left (7 subjects) hemisphere following 128 click stimuli delivered to contralateral, ipsilateral and both (bilateral) ears. Right hemisphere MAEFs were of higher amplitude following contralateral, compared to ipsilateral, stimulation in 9 of 11 subjects; mean contralateral response amplitude was 135 ± 33% (S.D.) of ipsilateral response amplitude. Left hemisphere MAEFs were of higher amplitude following contralateral stimulation in 7 of 7 subjects; mean contralateral response amplitude was 145 ± 44% of ipsilateral response amplitude. These observations are compatible with evidence that a majority of centripetal auditory input is crossed, and/or that contralateral auditory stimulation activates a larger area of cortex than does ipsilateral stimulation.