We give in this paper an explicit formal account of plural semantics in the framework of continuation semantics introduced in (1) and extended in (4). We deal with aspects of plural dynamic semantics such as plural quantification, plural anaphora, conjunction and disjunction, distributivity and maximality conditions. Those phenomena need no extra stipulations to be accounted for in this framework, because continuation semantics provides a unified account of scope- taking. Index Terms —Discourse semantics, continuations, plural anaphora, plural quantifiers' scope. I. INTRODUCTION HE formal study of plurals is a major and complex undertaking. It should address plural quantification, plural anaphora, conjunction and disjunction, distributivity, maximality, among other problems. Ideally, plural linguistic phenomena should be parallel to their singular counterpart. Unfortunately, it is not so: plurality introduces a number of complications not present in the analysis of singular. In this paper we will only give some directions for further study of plural semantics (our analysis is far from being exhaustive), with emphasis on plural anaphora, in the framework of continuation semantics. The programming language concept of continuations was successfully used by Barker and Shan in a series of articles to analyze intra-sentential linguistic phenomena such as focus fronting, donkey anaphora, presuppositions, crossover or superiority (2, 3, 19, 18, 1). Moreover, (9) proposed an elegant discourse semantics based on continuations. Continuations are a standard tool in computer science, used to control side effects of computation (such as evaluation order, print or passing values). The basic idea of continuizing a grammar is to provide subexpressions with direct access to their own continuations (future context), so subexpressions are modified to take a continuation as an argument. For instance, if we take the local context to be restricted to the sentence, when computing the meaning of the sentence John saw Mary , the default future of the value denoted by the subject is that it is destined to have the property of seeing Mary predicated of it. In symbols, the continuation of the subject denotation j is the function
Read full abstract