Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Intensity Research Articles

The Effects of Early-Phase, Low- or Standard-Intensity Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy on Acid-Base Control and Clinical Outcomes: An Observational Study

Introduction: The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline recommends administering an effluent volume of 20–25 mL/kg/h during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for acute kidney injury. Recent evidence on CRRT initiation showed that less intervention might be beneficial for renal recovery. This study aimed to explore the association between early-phase low CRRT intensity and acid-base balance corrections and clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational study at a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan. All adult patients requiring CRRT in the ICU were included. Eligible patients were classified into the Low group (dialysate flow rate [QD] 10.0–19.9 mL/kg/h) and the Standard group (QD ≥20 mL/kg/h) by the intensity of CRRT at the beginning. The primary outcomes were acid-base parameters 6 h after CRRT initiation. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis to estimate the association between the intensity group and the outcomes. Results: Overall, 194 patients were classified into the Low group (n = 144) and the Standard group (n = 50). The Standard group presented with more severe acid-base disturbances, including lower pH and base excess (BE) at baseline. At 6 h after CRRT initiation, pH, BE, and strong ion difference values were comparable, even after adjusting for baseline severity. Despite the efficient correction, no evident differences were observed in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: The initial standard intensity appeared to be efficient in correcting acid-base imbalance at the early phase of CRRT; however, further studies are needed to assess the impact on clinical outcomes.

Vancomycin dosing in high-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: A retrospective cohort study.

An inverse relationship exists between vancomycin serum concentrations and the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), reflected through the dialysate flow rate (DFR). There remains a lack of evidence to guide initial vancomycin dosing in the setting of high-intensity CRRT (i.e., DFR >30 mL/kg/h). Additionally, recommendations for pharmacokinetic monitoring of vancomycin have transitioned from a trough-based to area under the curve (AUC)-based dosing strategy to optimize efficacy and safety. Therefore, an improved understanding of the impact of CRRT intensity on AUC/MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) has the potential to enhance vancomycin dosing in this patient population. The goal of this study is to evaluate current vancomycin dosing strategies and achievement of pharmacokinetic targets in patients on high-intensity CRRT. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult critically ill patients admitted to Houston Methodist Hospital between May 2019 and October 2021 and received vancomycin therapy while on high-intensity CRRT. High-intensity CRRT was defined by a DFR that was both ≥3 L/h and >30 mL/kg/h. Depending on the initial vancomycin dosing strategy, patients were stratified into either the traditional (15 mg/kg/day) or enhanced (≥15 mg/kg/day) dosing group. The primary outcome was the percent of patients who attained steady-state AUC24 /MIC ≥400 mg*h/L at the first obtained vancomycin level in the enhanced group compared with the traditional group. A total of 125 patients were included in the final analysis, 56 in the traditional and 69 in the enhanced dosing group. The primary end point occurred in 74% and 54% of patients in the enhanced and traditional dosing groups, respectively (p = 0.029). Therapeutic vancomycin trough levels (10-20 μg/mL) were more commonly achieved in the enhanced dosing group compared with the traditional dosing group (66.7% vs. 45%, p = 0.013). As DFR rose, increasingly higher doses of vancomycin, up to 27 mg/kg/day, were required to achieve the therapeutic targets. This is the first study to evaluate the influence of variable CRRT intensities on vancomycin AUC/MIC. Our findings suggest that vancomycin doses of ≥15 mg/kg/day are needed to achieve early therapeutic targets in patients on high-intensity CRRT.

Poor Correlation between Meropenem and Piperacillin Plasma Concentrations and Delivered Dose of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

There is insufficient data on the relationship between antibiotic dosing and plasma concentrations in patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). In this prospective observational study, we explored the variability in plasma concentrations of meropenem and piperacillin in critically ill patients treated with CRRT and the correlation between concentrations and CRRT intensity. Antibiotic concentrations were measured at the middle and end of the dosing interval and repeated after 2 to 3 days when feasible. Measured concentrations were compared to the clinical susceptible breakpoints for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 16 and 2 mg/liter for piperacillin and meropenem, respectively. CRRT intensity was estimated by delivered, time-averaged, total effluent flow (Qeff), corrected for predilution. Concentrations were also compared between patients with different residual diuresis. We included 140 meropenem concentrations from 98 patients and 47 piperacillin concentrations from 37 patients. Concentrations at the middle of the dosing interval were above target at all occasions for both antibiotics. For meropenem, 6.5% of trough concentrations were below target, and for piperacillin, 22%. Correlations between Qeff and antibiotic concentrations or the concentration half-life (t1/2) were either statistically not significant or weak. Meropenem concentrations and t1/2 values differed between patients with different residual diuresis. Thus, when treating intensive care patients with CRRT and recommended doses of meropenem or piperacillin, both low, suboptimal plasma concentrations and unnecessarily high, potentially toxic, plasma concentrations are common. Plasma concentrations cannot be predicted from CRRT intensity. Residual diuresis is associated with lower meropenem concentrations, but the correlation is weak. Concentration measurement is probably the most useful approach to avoid suboptimal treatment.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam exposure in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy: a PK/PD approach to tailor dosing.

To investigate the influence of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) intensity on the clearance of ceftolozane/tazobactam in critical care patients, and to evaluate if the reported doses would achieve an optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target against Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibiting different MICs. The MEDLINE-PubMed database was searched from inception to January 2020 to retrieve observational studies or case reports investigating the PK behaviour of ceftolozane/tazobactam during CRRT. Relevant CRRT settings and PK variables were extracted, and the influence of CRRT intensity on ceftolozane/tazobactam total clearance (CLtot) was determined by simple linear regression. The optimal PK/PD target for the reported doses was deemed to be achieved when ceftolozane trough concentrations (Cmin) were above the MIC (less intensive target) or four times the MIC (intensive target) for P. aeruginosa. Data from six studies including 11 patients (mean age 56.6 years) were analysed. Mean blood flow rate and effluent flow rate were 161.8 mL/min and 2383.4 mL/h, respectively. Ceftolozane Cmin ranged from 25.8 to 79.4 mg/L. A significant correlation was found for ceftolozane CLtot and effluent flow rate (P = 0.027). The intensive PK/PD target was achieved by 100% and 50% of the reported doses for MIC, respectively, up to 4 and 8 mg/L. A significant correlation between effluent flow rate and ceftolozane clearance during CRRT could be identified. Higher dosing regimens coupled with continuous/extended infusion may be required in the case of higher CRRT intensity, deep-seated infections or poorly susceptible isolates. Larger studies assessing ceftolozane PK in different CRRT settings are warranted.

Pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim/sulfametrole in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy.

We investigated the effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on the pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim and sulfametrole. We enrolled critically ill adults undergoing CRRT and critically ill adults with normal or slightly impaired renal function (plasma creatinine concentration <1.5 mg/dL, control group). All patients received trimethoprim/sulfametrole at standard doses. Pharmacokinetics were determined after the first dose and at steady-state. In addition, a population pharmacokinetic model using plasma data was built. We also assessed the renal clearance (CLR) and the extracorporeal clearance in patients undergoing CRRT. Twelve patients were enrolled in the CRRT group and 12 patients in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in trimethoprim pharmacokinetics between the two groups. In patients on CRRT, total plasma clearance (CLtot) and V of sulfametrole were significantly higher than in the control group. However, sulfametrole exposure was not significantly altered during CRRT. The population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that neither CRRT intensity nor residual diuresis were significant covariates on trimethoprim or sulfametrole CL. Median CL by continuous venovenous haemofiltration accounted for about one-third of CLtot of trimethoprim and for about one-half of CLtot of sulfametrole. In patients on CRRT, CLR of trimethoprim and sulfametrole were <5% of CLtot. During CRRT, standard doses of trimethoprim/sulfametrole appear to be adequate.

Population pharmacokinetics and simulations of imipenem in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy

Various dose regimens of imipenem have been prescribed in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) but there are limited information on its pharmacokinetics (PK) and treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to describe the population PK of imipenem in patients receiving CRRT, and utilize this model to inform optimal dosing regimens using pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target as a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy. Population PK modelling was undertaken in 20 patients receiving CRRT to characterize variabilities and identify influential covariates. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate differences in probability of target attainment (PTA) between empirically used dosing regimens (0.5 g q6h, 1 g q8h, and 1 g q6h), and to explore the impact of CRRT intensity and identified covariates on target attainment. Imipenem concentration data were adequately described using a one-compartment model. Residual diuresis and burn injury were identified modifiers for imipenem endogenous clearance. The simulations showed that the impact of CRRT intensity on target attainment is clinically irrelevant, whereas urine output and burn injury influence PTA for pathogens with an MIC ≥ 4 mg/L. At an MIC ≤ 2 mg/L, satisfactory PTAs (>80%) were achieved for all three investigated dose regimens regardless of urine output, burn injury, and CRRT intensity. Our results indicate that from a safety perspective, 0.5 g q6h imipenem is optimal in these patients for pathogens with an MIC ≤ 2 mg/L, and 1 g q6h is recommended for non-burn patients with anuria against MIC 4–16 mg/L.

Higher versus Lower Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Intensity in Critically ill Patients with Liver Dysfunction

Aims: To study the association between higher versus lower continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) intensity and mortality in critically ill patients with combined acute kidney injury and liver dysfunction. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of patients with liver dysfunction (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment liver score ≥2 or diagnosis of liver failure/transplant) included in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level renal replacement therapy (RENAL) trial. Results: Of 444 patients, 210 (47.3%) were randomized to higher intensity (effluent flow 40 mL/kg/h) and 234 (52.7%) to lower intensity (effluent flow 25 mL/kg/h) therapy. Overall, 79 and 86% of prescribed effluent flow was delivered in the higher-intensity and lower-intensity groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In total, 113 (54.1%) and 120 (51.3%) patients died in each group. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, we found no independent association between higher CRRT intensity and mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.24; p = 0.642). Conclusions: In RENAL patients with liver dysfunction, higher CRRT intensity was not associated with reduced mortality.

IMPACT OF CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY INTENSITY ON SEPTIC ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY.

The intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI) has been evaluated, but recent randomized clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a beneficial impact of high intensity on the outcomes. High intensity might cause some detrimental results recognized recently as CRRT trauma. This study was undertaken to evaluate the association of CRRT intensity with mortality in a population of AKI patients treated with lower-intensity CRRT in Japan. A retrospective single-center cohort study enrolled 125 AKI patients treated with CRRT in mixed intensive care units of a university hospital in Japan. Subanalysis was conducted for septic and postsurgical AKI. The median value of the prescribed total effluent rate was 20.1 (interquartile range 15.3-27.1) mL/kg/h. Overall, univariate Cox regression analysis indicated no association of the CRRT intensity with the 60-day in-hospital mortality rate (hazard ratio 1.006, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.991-1.018, P = 0.343). In subanalysis with the septic AKI patients, multivariate analysis revealed two factors associated independently with the 60-day mortality rate: the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at initiation of CRRT (hazard ratio 1.152, 95% CI 1.025-1.301, P = 0.0171) and the CRRT intensity (hazard ratio 1.024, 95% CI 1.004-1.042, P = 0.0195). The CRRT intensity was associated significantly with higher 60-day in-hospital mortality in septic AKI, suggesting that unknown detrimental effects of CRRT with high-intensity CRRT might worsen the outcomes in septic AKI patients.

Meropenem population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy: influence of residual diuresis on dose requirements.

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is complex, with the recommended maintenance doses being 500 mg to 1,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) to every 12 h. This multicenter study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of meropenem in this population to identify the sources of PK variability and to evaluate different dosing regimens to develop recommendations based on clinical parameters. Thirty patients with septic shock and CRRT receiving meropenem were enrolled (153 plasma samples were tested). A population PK model was developed with data from 24 patients and subsequently validated with data from 6 patients using NONMEM software (v.7.3). The final model was characterized by CL = 3.68 + 0.22 · (residual diuresis/100) and V = 33.00 · (weight/73)(2.07), where CL is total body clearance (in liters per hour), residual diuresis is the volume of residual diuresis (in milliliters per 24 h), and V is the apparent volume of distribution (in liters). CRRT intensity was not identified to be a CL modifier. Monte Carlo simulations showed that to maintain concentrations of the unbound fraction (fu ) of drug above the MIC of the bacteria for 40% of dosing interval T (referred to as 40% of the ƒ uT >MIC), a meropenem dose of 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min would be sufficient regardless of the residual diuresis. If 100% of the ƒ uT >MIC was chosen as the target, oligoanuric patients would require 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min for the treatment of susceptible bacteria (MIC < 2 mg/liter), while patients with preserved diuresis would require the same dose given as an infusion over 3 h. If bacteria with MICs close to the resistance breakpoint (2 to 4 mg/liter) were to be treated with meropenem, a dose of 500 mg every 6 h would be necessary: a bolus over 30 min for oligoanuric patients and an infusion over 3 h for patients with preserved diuresis. Our results suggest that residual diuresis may be an easy and inexpensive tool to help with titration of the meropenem dose and infusion time in this challenging population.

The lower limit of intensity to control uremia during continuous renal replacement therapy.

IntroductionThe recommended lower limit of intensity during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is 20 or 25 mL/kg/h. However, limited information is available to support this threshold. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different intensities of CRRT on the clearance of creatinine and urea in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI).MethodsThis is a multicenter retrospective study conducted in 14 Japanese ICUs in 12 centers. All patients older than 18 years and treated with CRRT due to AKI were eligible. We evaluated the effect of CRRT intensity by two different definitions: daily intensity (the mean intensity over each 24-h period) and average intensity (the mean of daily intensity during the period while CRRT was performed). To study the effect of different CRRT intensity on clearance of urea and creatinine, all patients/daily observations were arbitrarily allocated to one of 4 groups based on the average intensity and daily intensity: <10, 10–15, 15–20, and >20 mL/kg/h.ResultsTotal 316 patients were included and divided into the four groups according to average CRRT intensity. The groups comprised 64 (20.3%), 138 (43.7%), 68 (21.5%), and 46 patients (14.6%), respectively. Decreases in creatinine and urea increased as the average intensity increased over the first 7 days of CRRT. The relative changes of serum creatinine and urea levels remained close to 1 over the 7 days in the “<10” group. Total 1,101 daily observations were included and divided into the four groups according to daily CRRT intensity. The groups comprised 254 (23.1%), 470 (42.7%), 239 (21.7%), and 138 observations (12.5%), respectively. Creatinine and urea increased (negative daily change) only in the “<10” group and decreased with the increasing daily intensity in the other groups.ConclusionsThe lower limit of delivered intensity to control uremia during CRRT was approximately between 10 and 15 mL/kg/h in our cohort. A prescribed intensity of approximately 15 mL/kg/h might be adequate to control uremia for patients with severe AKI in the ICU. However, considering the limitations due to the retrospective nature of this study, prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.

Beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy.

Although early and appropriate antibiotic therapy remains the most important intervention for successful treatment of septic shock, data guiding optimization of beta-lactam prescription in critically ill patients prescribed with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are still limited. Being small hydrophilic molecules, beta-lactams are likely to be cleared by CRRT to a significant extent. As a result, additional variability may be introduced to the per se variable antibiotic concentrations in critically ill patients. This article aims to describe the current clinical scenario for beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and CRRT, to highlight the sources of variability among the different studies that reduce extrapolation to clinical practice, and to identify the opportunities for future research and improvement in this field. Three frequently prescribed beta-lactams (meropenem, piperacillin and ceftriaxone) were chosen for review. Our findings showed that present dosing recommendations are based on studies with drawbacks limiting their applicability in the clinical setting. In general, current antibiotic dosing regimens for CRRT follow a one-size-fits-all fashion despite emerging clinical data suggesting that drug clearance is partially dependent on CRRT modality and intensity. Moreover, some studies pool data from heterogeneous populations with CRRT that may exhibit different pharmacokinetics (for example, admission diagnoses different to septic shock, such as trauma), which also limit their extrapolation to critically ill patients with septic shock. Finally, there is still no consensus regarding the %T>MIC (percentage of dosing interval when concentration of the antibiotic is above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen) value that should be chosen as the pharmacodynamic target for antibiotic therapy in patients with septic shock and CRRT. For empirically optimized dosing, during the first day a loading dose is required to compensate the increased volume of distribution, regardless of impaired organ function. An additional loading dose may be required when CRRT is initiated due to steady-state equilibrium breakage driven by clearance variation. From day 2, dosing must be adjusted to CRRT settings and residual renal function. Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams may be regarded as a useful tool to daily individualize dosing and to ensure optimal antibiotic exposure.

β-lactam antibiotic concentrations during continuous renal replacement therapy.

IntroductionThe use of standard doses of β-lactam antibiotics during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may result in inadequate serum concentrations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of unadjusted drug regimens (i.e., similar to those used in patients with normal renal function) in patients treated with CRRT and the influence of CRRT intensity on drug clearance.MethodsWe reviewed data from 50 consecutive adult patients admitted to our Department of Intensive Care in whom routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics (ceftazidime or cefepime, CEF; piperacillin/tazobactam; TZP; meropenem, MEM) was performed using unadjusted β-lactam antibiotics regimens (CEF = 2 g q8h; TZP = 4 g q6h; MEM = 1 g q8h). Serum drug concentrations were measured twice during the elimination phase by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-UV). We considered therapy was adequate when serum drug concentrations were between 4 and 8 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during optimal periods of time for each drug (≥70% for CEF; ≥ 50% for TZP; ≥ 40% for MEM). Therapy was considered as early (ET) or late (LT) phase if TDM was performed within 48 hours of antibiotic initiation or later on, respectively.ResultsWe collected 73 serum samples from 50 patients (age 58 ± 13 years; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score on admission 21 (17–25)), 35 during ET and 38 during LT. Drug concentrations were above 4 times the MIC in 63 (90%), but above 8 times the MIC in 39 (53%) samples. The proportions of patients with adequate drug concentrations during ET and LT were quite similar. We found a weak but significant correlation between β-lactam antibiotics clearance and CRRT intensity.ConclusionsIn septic patients undergoing CRRT, doses of β-lactam antibiotics similar to those given to patients with normal renal function achieved drug levels above the target threshold in 90% of samples. Nevertheless, 53% of samples were associated with very high drug levels and daily drug regimens may need to be adapted accordingly.

Validity of Low-Intensity Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy*

To study the hospital mortality of patients with severe acute kidney injury treated with low-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy. Multicenter retrospective observational study (Japanese Society for Physicians and Trainees in Intensive Care), combined with previously conducted multinational prospective observational study (Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy). Fourteen Japanese ICUs in 12 tertiary hospitals (Japanese Society for Physicians and Trainees in Intensive Care) and 54 ICUs in 23 countries (Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy). Consecutive adult patients with severe acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy admitted to the participating ICUs in 2010 (Japanese Society for Physicians and Trainees in Intensive Care, n = 343) and 2001 (Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy, n = 1,006). None. Patient characteristics, variables at continuous renal replacement therapy initiation, continuous renal replacement therapy settings, and outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality and renal replacement therapy requirement at hospital discharge) were collected. Continuous renal replacement therapy intensity was arbitrarily classified into seven subclasses: less than 10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, and more than 35 mL/kg/hr. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate risk factors for hospital mortality. The continuous renal replacement therapy dose in the Japanese Society for Physicians and Trainees in Intensive Care database was less than half of the Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy database (800 mL/hr vs 2,000 mL/hr, p < 0.001). Even after adjusting for the body weight and dilution factor, continuous renal replacement therapy intensity was statistically different (14.3 mL/kg/hr vs 20.4 mL/kg/hr, p < 0.001). Patients in the Japanese Society for Physicians and Trainees in Intensive Care database had a lower ICU mortality (46.1% vs 55.3%, p = 0.003) and hospital mortality (58.6% vs 64.2%, p = 0.070) compared with patients in the Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy database. In multivariable regression analysis after combining the two databases, no continuous renal replacement therapy intensity subclasses were found to be statistically different from the reference intensity (20-25 mL/kg/hr). Several sensitivity analyses (patients with sepsis, patients from Western countries in the Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy database) confirmed no intensity-outcome relationship. Continuous renal replacement therapy at a mean intensity of 14.3 mL/kg/hr did not have worse outcome compared with 20-25 mL/kg/hr of continuous renal replacement therapy, currently considered the standard intensity. However, our study is insufficient to support the use of low-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy, and more studies are needed to confirm our findings.

A new regimen for continuous infusion of vancomycin during continuous renal replacement therapy

Continuous infusion (CI) of high-dose vancomycin is often used to treat life-threatening infections caused by less-susceptible Gram-positive bacteria. However, this approach has not been well studied in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of a new CI vancomycin regimen in septic patients undergoing CRRT. In this prospective study we measured vancomycin concentrations obtained with a new CI regimen for CRRT, which included a loading dose of 35 mg/kg given over a 4 h period followed by a daily dose of 14 mg/kg. Vancomycin concentrations were measured: at the end of the loading dose (T1); 12 h after the onset of therapy (T2); and 24 h after the onset of therapy (T3). Drug concentrations (at T2 and T3) were considered adequate if between 20 and 30 mg/L. CRRT intensity was calculated as: dialysate rate (mL/kg/h) + ultrafiltration rate (mL/kg/h). Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics were calculated using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. We studied 32 patients who received median (IQR) loading and daily vancomycin doses of 2750 mg (2250-3150) and 1100 mg (975-1270), respectively. Drug concentrations were: T1, 44 mg/L (38-58); T2, 27 mg/L (24-31); and T3, 23 mg/L (19-31). Vancomycin concentrations were adequate in 22/32 patients (69%) at T2 and in 20/32 (63%) at T3. The two relevant covariates that significantly affected drug concentrations were body weight and CRRT intensity. This new vancomycin regimen allowed the rapid achievement of target drug concentrations in the majority of patients. CRRT intensity had an influence on vancomycin clearance.

Early acid–base and blood pressure effects of continuous renal replacement therapy intensity in patients with metabolic acidosis

In acute kidney injury patients, metabolic acidosis is common. Its severity, duration, and associated changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and vasopressor therapy may be affected by the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We aimed to compare key aspects of acidosis and MAP and vasopressor therapy in patients treated with two different CRRT intensities. We studied a nested cohort of 115 patients from two tertiary intensive care units (ICUs) within a large multicenter randomized controlled trial treated with lower intensity (LI) or higher intensity (HI) CRRT. Levels of metabolic acidosis at randomization were similar [base excess (BE) of -8 ± 8 vs. -8 ± 7 mEq/l; p = 0.76]. Speed of BE correction did not differ between the two groups. However, the HI group had a greater increase in MAP from baseline to 24 h (7 ± 3 vs. 0 ± 3 mmHg; p < 0.01) and a greater decrease in norepinephrine dose (from 12.5 to 3.5 vs. 5 to 2.5 μg/min; p < 0.05). The correlation (r) coefficients between absolute change in MAP and norepinephrine (NE) dose versus change in BE were 0.05 and -0.37, respectively. Overall, LI and HI CRRT have similar acid-base effects in patients with acidosis. However, HI was associated with greater improvements in MAP and vasopressor requirements (clinical trial no. NCT00221013).

910

Introduction: Severe sepsis may alter the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of B-lactams, and the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may further compromise them. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between B-lactams clearance and CRRT intensity. Methods: We reviewed the data of all patients undergoing CRRT and treated with ceftazidime/cefepime (CEF, 2gq8h), meropenem (MEM, 1gq8h) or piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP, 4gq6h) since January 2010. Serum drug concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-UV), twice during the elimination phase after a 30-min intravenous drug administration. Antibiotic PKs were calculated using a one-compartment model and the percentage of time spent above four times the MIC (%T>4xMIC) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was obtained. CRRT data (blood flow, dialysate and ultrafiltrate rates) were collected and CRRT intensity was calculated as (dialysate + ultrafiltrate)/weight (kgs). Results are expressed as median [ranges]. Results: A total of 73 serum levels were obtained in 50 patients (CEF = 10; MEM = 44; TZP = 19). There was considerable variability in B-lactam serum concentrations and pharmacokinetic variables. We found a weak, although significant, correlation of CRRT intensity with both B-lactams clearance (r=0.31, p = 0.007) and the %T>4xMIC (r= -0.27, p = 0.02). B-lactams clearance was increased in patients with higher CRRT intensity ( 45 ml/kg.h = 74.7 [51.3-131.7] ml/min; p = 0.02). Also, the %T > 4xMIC significantly decreased in patients with higher CRRT intensity (p=0.04). Conclusions: B-lactams concentrations and clearances during CRRT are quite variable. The intensity of CRRT may influence drug levels and elimination and should be taken into account when drug regimens are prescribed.